DOCSLIB.ORG

Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedfn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedfn HikobiaHikobial3：645-665.2002 13: 645-665. 2002 MolecularMolecularphylo窪enyOfhypnobrJ/aleanmOssesasin化rredfroma phylogeny of hypnobryalean mosses as inferred from a large-scalelar淫e-scaledatasetofchlOroplastlｂｃＬ，withspecialre他rencetothe dataset of chloroplast rbcL, with special reference to the HypnaceaeHypnaceaeandpOssiblyrelatedfnmilies1 and possibly related families I HIROMIHIRoMITsuBoTA，ＴｏＭｏＴｓｕＧｕＡＲＩＫＡｗＡ，ＨＩＲｏＹｕＫＩＡＫＩＹＡＭＡ，ＥＦＲＡＩＮＤＥＬｕＮＡ，DoLoREs TSUBOTA, TOMOTSUGU ARIKAWA, HIROYUKI AKIYAMA, EFRAIN DE LUNA, DOLORES GONZALEZ,GoNzALEz,MASANoBuHIGucHIANDHIRoNoRIDEGucHI MASANOBU HIGUCHI AND HIRONORI DEGUCHI TSUBOTA,TsuBoTA,Ｈ､,ARIKAwA,Ｔ,AKIYAMA,Ｈ,,ＤＥＬｕＮＡ,Ｅ,GoNzALEz,，.,HIGucHI,Ｍ H., ARIKAWA, T., AKIYAMA, H., DE LUNA, E., GONZALEZ, D., HIGUCHI, M. ４ &＆DEGucHI，Ｈ、2002.Ｍolecularphylogenyofhypnobryaleanmossesasinferred DEGUCHI, H. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of hypnobryalean mosses as inferred fromfiPomalarge-scaledatasetofchloroplastr6cL,ｗｉｔｈspecialreferencetotheHypnaceae a large-scale dataset of chloroplast rbcL, with special reference to the Hypnaceae andandpossiblyrelatedfamiliesl3:645-665． possibly related families. 13: 645-665. ▲ PhylogeneticPhylogeneticrelationshipswithinthehypnobryaleanmosses(ｉｅ,theHypnales,Leuco- relationships within the hypnobryalean mosses (i.e., the Hypnales, Leuco­ dontales,dontales,andHookeriales）havebeenthefbcusofmuchattentioninrecentyears and Hookeriales) have been the focus of much attention in recent years. HereHerewepresentphylogeneticinfierencesonthislargeclade，andespeciallyonthe we present phylogenetic inferences on this large clade, and especially on the HypnaceaeHypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedftlmilies，basedonmaximumlikelihoodanalysisof and possibly related families, based on maximum likelihood analysis of 181l81r6cLsequences、Oursmdycorroboratesthat（１）theHypnales(ｓｓｔｒ.[＝sensu rbcL sequences. Our study corroborates that (I) the Hypnales (s. str. [= sensu VittVittl984])andLeucodontalesareeachnotmonophyleticentities、TheHypnalesand 1984]) and Leucodontales are each not monophyletic entities. The Hypnales and LeucodontalestogethercompriseawellsupportedsistercladetotheHookeriales;(2)Leucodontales together comprise a well supported sister clade to the Hookeriales; (2) theSematophyllaceae(s」at［＝sensuTsubotaetaL2000,2001a,ｂ])andPlagiothecia‐the Sematophyllaceae (s. la1. [= sensu Tsubota et a1. 2000, 2001a, b)) and Plagiothecia­ ceaeceae(s・str.［＝sensupresentDareeachresolvedasmonophyleticgroups,whileno (s. str. [= sensu present)) are each resolved as monophyletic groups, while no particularparticularcladeaccommodatesallmembersoftheHypnaceaeandCryphaeaceae;ａｎｄ clade accommodates all members of the Hypnaceae and Cryphaeaceae; and (3)(3)theHypnaceaeaswellasitstypegenusﾉﾘDlwz"川tselfwerepolyphyletioThese the Hypnaceae as well as its type genus Hypnum itself were polyphyletic. These resultsdonotconcurwiththesystemsofVitt(1984)andBuckandVitt(1986),whoresults do not concur with the systems of Vitt (1984) and Buck and Vitt (1986), who suggestedsuggestedthatthegroupswithasinglecostawouldhavedivergedfiFomthehypnalean that the groups with a single costa would have diverged from the hypnalean ancestorancestoratanearlyevolutionarystage，fbllowedbythegroupswithadoublecosta at an early evolutionary stage, followed by the groups with a double costa (see(seealsoTsubotaetall999;Bucketal2000）OurresultsfiPomlikelihoodanalyses also Tsubota et a1. 1999; Buck et a1. 2000). Our results from likelihood analyses ofofalarger6cLdatasetconfinnthesuggestionbysmallerdatasetsfiommultipleloci a large rbcL data set confirm the suggestion by smaller data sets from multiple loci firstbyDeLunaetal.(2000)andthenBucketaL(2000)thatthereisnoevidencefbrfirst by De Luna et a1. (2000) and then Buck et a1. (2000) that there is no evidence for supportingtheHypnales(ｓｓｔｒ.[＝sensuVittl984])andLeucodontales・Adetailedsupporting the Hypnales (s. str. [= sensu Vitt 1984]) and Leucodontales. A detailed reconsiderationofordinalclassihcationandfnmilialclassificationwithintheHyp-reconsideration of ordinal classification and familial classification within the Hyp­ nidaeiｓｎｏｗnecessary．nidae is now necessary. KeyWords:HypnalesLeucodontales,Hookeriales,hypnobryaleanmosses,molecularKey Words: Hypnales, Leucodontales, Hookeriales, hypnobryalean mosses, molecular phylogeny,r6cLlargedataset,Hypnaceae,Sematophyllaceae,Plagiotheciaceae,Am-phylogeny, rbcL, large data set, Hypnaceae, Sematophyllaceae, Plagiotheciaceae, Am­ blystegiaceae 。 肋Ｄ'"ｊ７Ｍ６ｏ/ｑｄＭｒﾉﾉ℃"ＭＤｅｇ"ｃｈｊ,Depα""ze"ｔｑ/Ｂｊｏ/ogjcα/Ｓｂｊｅ"Ｃｅ,Ｇｒａｄ"α/eHiromi Tsubota & Hironori Deguchi. Department (j[ Biological Science. Graduate Sb/ioo/ｑ／血e"Ｃｅ,Ⅲ℃sﾉｶ〃α〔ﾉﾉｊｊｖｅｌＭ１ﾉ,hgamli〕ﾉα碗αノー3-/,〃jgZJSﾙﾉｰﾊjrosﾉi〃α-School o[ Science. Hiroshima University. Kagamiyama 1-3-1. Higashi-hiroshima­ Ｗ,ﾉﾌﾞIﾉ･Csﾉi〃α739-852．ﾉﾋＷ/Lshi. Hiroshima 739-8526. Japan. 7bmojiFz`9ＭﾉWmwq,Depαﾉﾌﾞ'"e"'０/Ｂｊｏ/Ogjcα/Sbje"Ｃ＆Ｆ,Ｇ７α`"α/e此/ＩＯＣ/q/ｍｉｅ"Ｃｅ，Tomotsugu Arikawa. Department of Biological Sciences. Graduate School of Science. U>ﾌﾙe'Ｍﾜﾉq/mtyo,〃O'7907-3-/,βz"7/bﾉo-k"’７bﾉb′o川-0033,上pα"・University of Tokyo. Hongo 7-3-1. BunAyo-ku. Tokyo 113-0033. Japan. 航rqMEMﾉhi〕′α',、,/Ｍｌｓａｌ''１ｑ／ﾉVb【/"'℃α'z`ﾉ仙加α'Ｍα〃jrjes,町ogo，YZlO′ojgaoAaHiroyuki Akiyama. Museum (j[ Nature and Human Activities. Hyogo. Yayoigaoka 6-cho"ze,５位"dtJ-sAj,Hyogo669-/ｺﾞｲｄﾉﾋZpα〃6-chome. Sanda-shi. Hyogo 669-1546. Japan. 〃αｍＤｅＬ""α＆ＤＣ/oresOo'1Ｚ｡/ez,ＤｅＰａｒｔａｍｅ"ｊＭｅＳＭ伽/ｊｃａﾘﾉｾge/αＭＭｍｔｏEli-ain De Luna & Dolores Gonzalez. Departamento de Sistematica Vegetal. 1nstituto ｃ/ｅＥｃｏ/ｏｇｍｌＡＣ.,ＸＭＪｐａ，比７．９/000,ＭｄＸｊｃｏ、de Ecologia AC. Xalapa. Ver. 91000. Mexico. MJSα"０６〃ｆﾉﾉgZlcAj，Depα"ｍｅ"／ｑ/ＤＣ/αノリＭＪ/jolZα/比ｊｅ"ｃｅＭ`Ｓｃ"〃，伽αAr"６０Masanobu Higuchi. Department (j[ Botany. National Science Museum. Amakubo ｲｰ/-ＩｍＭ"6α-sﾙﾉ,仏aMhH305-000LﾉﾋZpα",ＤＥＰα"ﾉ?Te"／ｑ/Ｂｉo/ogjcα/Ｓ℃/e"ＣＧＳ，4-1-1. Tsukuba-shi. 1baraki 305-0005. Japan;Department of Biological Sciences. G/ndZJα/ｅ比ﾉioo/ｑ/此ｊｅ"Ce,Ｕ>7〃e′Ｍﾜﾉｑ/、oﾉb′０，肋"ｇｏ７~3-/,Ｂ２`"ﾉtyo-ﾉ1Ｗ,Tbﾉbﾉ。Graduate School (j[ Science. University (j[ Tokyo. Hongo 7-3-1. Bunkyo-ku. Tokyo 〃3-0033,上pα〃113-0033. Japan. 'ContributionfiOmtheLaboratolyofPlantTaxonomyandEcology,HiroshimaUniversity・ＮＳｅｒ・No.S２ＬI Contribution from the Laboratory of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, Hiroshima University. N. Ser. No. 521. 646 HikobiaVoll3,No.４，２００２Hikobia Vol. 13, No.4, 2002 Introduction talesandHookeriales）fbrcorroborationofthetales and Hookeriales) for corroboration of the phylogenetichypothesisofDeLunaetal.(2000）phylogenetic hypothesis of De Luna et al. (2000) Thehypnobryaleanmosses，includingtheor-The hypnobryalean mosses, including the or­ ａｎｄＢｕｃｋｅｔａＬ(2000);３)toclarifythefiamilialand Buck et al. (2000); 3) to clarify the familial dersHypnales，LeucodontalesandHookeriales，ders Hypnales, Leucodontales and Hookeriales, relationships，especiallybetweentheHypnaceaerelationships, especially between the Hypnaceae areoneofthemostdiversifiedmossgroups、are one of the most diversified moss groups. andrelatedfamilies，suchastheSematophylla-and related families, such as the Sematophylla­ AttentionhasbeenpaidtotheclassiflcationofAttention has been paid to the classification of ceaeandPlagiotheciaceae，withinthehypnobly-ceae and Plagiotheciaceae, within the hypnobry­ thehypnobryaleanmossessinceVitt（1984)pro‐the hypnobryalean mosses since Vitt (1984) pro­ aleanmosses，giventhattheLeucodontalesandalean mosses, given that the Leucodontales and videdanewsystemfbrtheBryopsida、Withinvided a new system for the Bryopsida. Within Hypnalesarenotmonophyletic;ａｎｄ４)totraceinHypnales are not monophyletic; and 4) to trace in thepleurocarpshesuggestedthat“adoublecostathe pleurocarps he suggested that" a double costa thephylogenythetransitionsofthecostafiDmthe phylogeny the transitions of the costa from ll groupasrepresentedbytheHypnaceae,Selnato-group" as represented by the Hypnaceae, Semato­ singletodouble，oneoftheimportantcharacterssingle to double, one of the important characters phyllaceaeandEntodontaceae，isdivergentfiDmphyllaceae and Entodontaceae, is divergent from fbrthefiamilialclassificationofthehypnobry-for the familial classification of the hypnobry­ ０ agroupwithasinglecosta，ｗｈｉｃｈｃａｎｂｅｒｅ－a group with a single costa, which can be re­ aleanmosses、alean mosses. ｇａｒｄｅｄａｓｔｂｅｍｏｓｔｒecentevolutionarystageofgarded as the most recent evolutionary stage of Recent，molecularphylogeneticanalysesfbrRecent, molecular phylogenetic analyses for theorderHypnales(seealsoTsubotaetall999；the order Hypnales (see also Tsubota et al. 1999; pleurocarpousmosseswerebasedonr6cLse-pleurocarpous mosses were based on rbcL se­ Bucketal2000）Subsequently,BuckandVittBuck et al. 2000). Subsequently, Buck and Vitt quencesalongwithotherdatasets,ｓｕｃｈａｓａｍＢ，quences along with other data sets, such as alpB, ￣ (1986)(1986)constluctedanotherclassificationfbrhyp- constructed another classification for hyp­ 伽Ｌ－Ｆａｎｄノアs４Ａｔｔｈｅｐｒｅｓｅｎｔｔｉｍｅ，tbere-IrnL-F and rps4. At the present time, the re­ noblyaleanmossesbasedonmorphologicalandnobryalean mosses based on morphological and sourcessourcesofr6cLsequencesarethemostcompre- of rbcL sequences are the most compre­ ecologicalecologicaldata、 data. hensivesamplingfbrthehypnaleanmosses・hensive sampling for the hypnalean mosses. Inrecentyears，phylogeneticrelationshipsIn recent years, phylogenetic relationships Alignmentofthe'6cLsequencesisalsoeasybe-Alignment of the rbcL sequences is also easy be­ withinthehypnobryaleanmosseshavebeenthewithin the hypnobryalean mosses have been the causecauseoftheirdistinctionasaprotein-codingre‐ of their distinction as a protein-coding re­ focusfbcusofmucbattentionatseveraltaxonomiclev- of much attention at several taxonomic lev­ giongioninthecodonpositions・Sqwepresenthere
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Revision of Schoenobryum (Cryphaeaceae, Bryopsida) in Africa1
    Revision of Schoenobryum 147 Tropical Bryology 24: 147-159, 2003 A revision of Schoenobryum (Cryphaeaceae, Bryopsida) in Africa1 Brian J. O’Shea 141 Fawnbrake Avenue, London SE24 0BG, U.K. Abstract. The nine species and two varieties of Schoenobryum reported for Africa were investigated, and no characters were found that uniquely identified any of the taxa to be other than the pantropical Schoenobryum concavifolium. The following nine names become new synonyms of S. concavifolium: Cryphaea madagassa, C. subintegra, Acrocryphaea robusta, A. latifolia, A. subrobusta, A. tisserantii, A. latifolia var. microspora, A. plicatula and A. subintegra var. idanreense; a lectotype is selected for Acrocryphaea latifolia var. microspora P.de la Varde. INTRODUCTION as the majority have not been examined since the type description, and many have never been A recent checklist of Sub-Saharan Africa illustrated. (O’Shea, 1999) included nine species and two varieties of Schoenobryum, most of quite limited The purpose of this paper is to provide an distribution. Recent collecting in both Malawi overview of the genus worldwide, and to review (O’Shea et al., 2001) and Uganda (Wigginton et the taxonomic position of the African taxa. al., 2001) has shown the genus to be not uncommon, although there was only one CRYPHAEACEAE SCHIMP. 1856. previously published collection from the two countries (O’Shea, 1993). Apart from one Cryphaeaceae Schimp., Coroll. Bryol. Eur. 97. African taxon occurring in nine countries, the 1856 [‘1855’]. Type: Cryphaea D.Mohr in other 10 occurred in an average of 1.7 countries. F.Weber This particular profile is typical of unrevised genera in Africa, and indicative of a possible A brief review of the circumscription and need for revision (O’Shea, 1997), particularly systematics of the family, and the distinctions from related families (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosses Are Often Overlooked and Although Many Are Quite Small, They Play a Vital Role in Most Ecosystems
    Plant of the Week MMoosssseess When considering plants, mosses are often overlooked and although many are quite small, they play a vital role in most ecosystems. We usually think of mosses as conspicuous components of wet habitats, rainforests, swamps, creek and river banks, but when you know what to look for, and how to look, you will find mosses in some pretty harsh environments: in deserts; alpine, arctic and subantarctic regions; even round volcanic fumaroles. Don’t forget, they are plants and they do carry out photosynthesis but they produce spores rather than flowers and they don’t have an internal conducting (vascular) system. Hypnodendron \vitiense subsp. australe Bryophytes are probably more important than many other divisions of the plant kingdom because of their interaction with water. Mosses are able to hold amazing quantities of moisture between their minute, often finely sculptured, overlapping leaves and fine, massed rhizoids (root like structures). In rainforests, mosses reduce the velocity of water and minimize erosion processes; mosses and liverworts in tree canopies can absorb moisture as if they were giant sponges, humidifying the forest for long periods after rain. In deserts, where they are Ptychomnion aciculare Mosses from Werrikimbe National Park in northern NSW Dawsonia superba components of biological soil crusts (complex combinations of algae, fungi, lichens, mosses and liverworts), mosses have the ability to rapidly absorb and store moisture from dew or fog. They stabilize desert soils and protect dunes from erosion by wind and flash flooding. They also contribute to the fertility of desert soils, and enhance the survival of ephemeral, annual and perennial seedlings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cladistic Analysis of the Family Cryphaeaceae (Bryophyta) with Emphasis on Cryphaea: a Study Based on a Comprehensive Morphological Dataset
    DARWINIANA, nueva serie 5(1): S1-S9. 2017 Versión final, efectivamente publicada el 31 de julio de 2017 DOI: 10.14522/darwiniana.2017.51.728 ISSN 0011-6793 impresa - ISSN 1850-1699 en línea CLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE FAMILY CRYPHAEACEAE (BRYOPHYTA) WITH EMPHASIS ON CRYPHAEA: A STUDY BASED ON A COMPREHENSIVE MORPHOLOGICAL DATASET SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX Jorge R. Flores; Santiago A. Catalano & Guillermo M. Suárez Unidad Ejecutora Lillo (CONICET - Fundación Miguel Lillo); Miguel Lillo 251, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo - Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Miguel Lillo 205, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina; [email protected] (autor corresponsal) SPECIMENS EXAMINED Cyclodictyon albicans (Hedw.) Kuntze: M. Schiavone 3303 (LIL). Cryphaea apiculata Schimp.: M. Schiavone Cyclodictyon lorentzii (Müll.) Buck & Schiavo- 2535, 3302 (LIL); G. Suárez 482 (LIL); G. Suárez ne: M. Schiavone 1265 (LIL). & M. Schiavone 97 (LIL). Cyclodictyon varians (Sull.) Kuntze: Costa et Cryphaea brevipila Mitt.: A. Hüebschmann 1 al. 5073 (RB); M. S. Dias s/n (RB 453018). (NY), M. Schiavone et al. 2711(LIL); G. Suárez Dendrocryphaea cuspidata (Sull.) Broth.: Kün- 162, 522 (LIL); A. Schinini 24788B (NY). hnemann 5176 (BA, LIL); Porter 1901 (NY, LIL, Cryphaea furcinervis Müll. Hal.: M. Schiavone HBr); Crosby 11702 (NY, LIL); Dusén 23 (NY, LIL). & B. Biasuso 838, 1597 (LIL); G. Suárez & M. Dendrocryphaea gorveana (Mont.) Paris & Schiavone 49 (LIL). Schimp.: Montagne s/n (NY, LIL); Lechler s/n Cryphaea jamesonii Taylor.: M. Schiavone & B. (PC, LIL). Biasuso 2154, 3086 (LIL); M. Schiavone, B. Biasu- Dendrocryphaea tasmanica (Mitt.) Broth.: A. so & S.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of New Zealand Mosses
    FLORA OF NEW ZEALAND MOSSES BRACHYTHECIACEAE A.J. FIFE Fascicle 46 – JUNE 2020 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2020. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: "Source: Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: "Sourced from Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" See Image Information for copyright and licence details for images. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Fife, Allan J. (Allan James), 1951- Flora of New Zealand : mosses. Fascicle 46, Brachytheciaceae / Allan J. Fife. -- Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2020. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-947525-65-1 (pdf) ISBN 978-0-478-34747-0 (set) 1. Mosses -- New Zealand -- Identification. I. Title. II. Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. UDC 582.345.16(931) DC 588.20993 DOI: 10.7931/w15y-gz43 This work should be cited as: Fife, A.J. 2020: Brachytheciaceae. In: Smissen, R.; Wilton, A.D. Flora of New Zealand – Mosses. Fascicle 46. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. http://dx.doi.org/10.7931/w15y-gz43 Date submitted: 9 May 2019 ; Date accepted: 15 Aug 2019 Cover image: Eurhynchium asperipes, habit with capsule, moist. Drawn by Rebecca Wagstaff from A.J. Fife 6828, CHR 449024. Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 Typification...............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with Emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium
    Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium QI-YING, CAI1, 2, BI-CAI, GUAN2, GANG, GE2, YAN-MING, FANG 1 1 College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China. 2 College of Life Science, Nanchang University, 330031 Nanchang, China. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present molecular phylogenetic investigation of Thuidiaceae, especially on Thudium and Pelekium. Three chloroplast sequences (trnL-F, rps4, and atpB-rbcL) and one nuclear sequence (ITS) were analyzed. Data partitions were analyzed separately and in combination by employing MP (maximum parsimony) and Bayesian methods. The influence of data conflict in combined analyses was further explored by two methods: the incongruence length difference (ILD) test and the partition addition bootstrap alteration approach (PABA). Based on the results, ITS 1& 2 had crucial effect in phylogenetic reconstruction in this study, and more chloroplast sequences should be combinated into the analyses since their stability for reconstructing within genus of pleurocarpous mosses. We supported that Helodiaceae including Actinothuidium, Bryochenea, and Helodium still attributed to Thuidiaceae, and the monophyletic Thuidiaceae s. lat. should also include several genera (or species) from Leskeaceae such as Haplocladium and Leskea. In the Thuidiaceae, Thuidium and Pelekium were resolved as two monophyletic groups separately. The results from molecular phylogeny were supported by the crucial morphological characters in Thuidiaceae s. lat., Thuidium and Pelekium. Key words: Thuidiaceae, Thuidium, Pelekium, molecular phylogeny, cpDNA, ITS, PABA approach Introduction Pleurocarpous mosses consist of around 5000 species that are defined by the presence of lateral perichaetia along the gametophyte stems. Monophyletic pleurocarpous mosses were resolved as three orders: Ptychomniales, Hypnales, and Hookeriales (Shaw et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedfn
    Hikobial3：645-665.2002 Molecularphylo窪enyOfhypnobrJ/aleanmOssesasin化rredfroma lar淫e-scaledatasetofchlOroplastlｂｃＬ，withspecialre他rencetothe HypnaceaeandpOssiblyrelatedfnmilies1 HIRoMITsuBoTA，ＴｏＭｏＴｓｕＧｕＡＲＩＫＡｗＡ，ＨＩＲｏＹｕＫＩＡＫＩＹＡＭＡ，ＥＦＲＡＩＮＤＥＬｕＮＡ，DoLoREs GoNzALEz,MASANoBuHIGucHIANDHIRoNoRIDEGucHI TsuBoTA,Ｈ､,ARIKAwA,Ｔ,AKIYAMA,Ｈ,,ＤＥＬｕＮＡ,Ｅ,GoNzALEz,，.,HIGucHI,Ｍ ４ ＆DEGucHI，Ｈ、2002.Ｍolecularphylogenyofhypnobryaleanmossesasinferred fiPomalarge-scaledatasetofchloroplastr6cL,ｗｉｔｈspecialreferencetotheHypnaceae andpossiblyrelatedfamiliesl3:645-665． ▲ Phylogeneticrelationshipswithinthehypnobryaleanmosses(ｉｅ,theHypnales,Leuco- dontales,andHookeriales）havebeenthefbcusofmuchattentioninrecentyears Herewepresentphylogeneticinfierencesonthislargeclade，andespeciallyonthe Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedftlmilies，basedonmaximumlikelihoodanalysisof l81r6cLsequences、Oursmdycorroboratesthat（１）theHypnales(ｓｓｔｒ.[＝sensu Vittl984])andLeucodontalesareeachnotmonophyleticentities、TheHypnalesand LeucodontalestogethercompriseawellsupportedsistercladetotheHookeriales;(2) theSematophyllaceae(s」at［＝sensuTsubotaetaL2000,2001a,ｂ])andPlagiothecia‐ ceae(s・str.［＝sensupresentDareeachresolvedasmonophyleticgroups,whileno particularcladeaccommodatesallmembersoftheHypnaceaeandCryphaeaceae;ａｎｄ (3)theHypnaceaeaswellasitstypegenusﾉﾘDlwz"川tselfwerepolyphyletioThese resultsdonotconcurwiththesystemsofVitt(1984)andBuckandVitt(1986),who suggestedthatthegroupswithasinglecostawouldhavedivergedfiFomthehypnalean ancestoratanearlyevolutionarystage，fbllowedbythegroupswithadoublecosta (seealsoTsubotaetall999;Bucketal2000）OurresultsfiPomlikelihoodanalyses
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Publications 1974 – 2019
    W. SZAFER INSTITUTE OF BOTANY POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Ryszard Ochyra BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PUBLICATIONS 1974 – 2019 KRAKÓW 2019 Ochyraea tatrensis Váňa Part I. Monographs, Books and Scientific Papers Part I. Monographs, Books and Scientific Papers 5 1974 001. Ochyra, R. (1974): Notatki florystyczne z południowo‑wschodniej części Kotliny Sandomierskiej [Floristic notes from southeastern part of Kotlina Sandomierska]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 360 Prace Botaniczne 2: 161–173 [in Polish with English summary]. 002. Karczmarz, K., J. Mickiewicz & R. Ochyra (1974): Musci Europaei Orientalis Exsiccati. Fasciculus III, Nr 101–150. 12 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 1975 003. Karczmarz, K., J. Mickiewicz & R. Ochyra (1975): Musci Europaei Orientalis Exsiccati. Fasciculus IV, Nr 151–200. 13 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 004. Karczmarz, K., K. Jędrzejko & R. Ochyra (1975): Musci Europaei Orientalis Exs‑ iccati. Fasciculus V, Nr 201–250. 13 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 005. Karczmarz, K., H. Mamczarz & R. Ochyra (1975): Hepaticae Europae Orientalis Exsiccatae. Fasciculus III, Nr 61–90. 8 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 1976 006. Ochyra, R. (1976): Materiały do brioflory południowej Polski [Materials to the bry‑ oflora of southern Poland]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 432 Prace Botaniczne 4: 107–125 [in Polish with English summary]. 007. Ochyra, R. (1976): Taxonomic position and geographical distribution of Isoptery‑ giopsis muelleriana (Schimp.) Iwats. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 22: 129–135 + 1 map as insertion [with Polish summary]. 008. Karczmarz, K., A. Łuczycka & R. Ochyra (1976): Materiały do flory ramienic środkowej i południowej Polski. 2 [A contribution to the flora of Charophyta of central and southern Poland. 2]. Acta Hydrobiologica 18: 193–200 [in Polish with English summary].
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3-1 Sexuality: Sexual Strategies Janice M
    Glime, J. M. and Bisang, I. 2017. Sexuality: Sexual Strategies. Chapt. 3-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 3-1-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 2 April 2017 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 3-1 SEXUALITY: SEXUAL STRATEGIES JANICE M. GLIME AND IRENE BISANG TABLE OF CONTENTS Expression of Sex............................................................................................................................................... 3-1-2 Unisexual and Bisexual Taxa............................................................................................................................. 3-1-2 Sex Chromosomes....................................................................................................................................... 3-1-6 An unusual Y Chromosome........................................................................................................................ 3-1-7 Gametangial Arrangement.......................................................................................................................... 3-1-8 Origin of Bisexuality in Bryophytes ................................................................................................................ 3-1-11 Monoicy as a Derived/Advanced Character.............................................................................................. 3-1-11 Anthocerotophyta and Multiple Reversals...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mosses: Weber and Wittmann, Electronic Version 11-Mar-00
    Catalog of the Colorado Flora: a Biodiversity Baseline Mosses: Weber and Wittmann, electronic version 11-Mar-00 Amblystegiaceae Amblystegium Bruch & Schimper, 1853 Amblystegium serpens (Hedwig) Bruch & Schimper var. juratzkanum (Schimper) Rau & Hervey WEBER73B. Amblystegium juratzkanum Schimper. Calliergon (Sullivant) Kindberg, 1894 Calliergon cordifolium (Hedwig) Kindberg WEBER73B; HERMA76. Calliergon giganteum (Schimper) Kindberg Larimer Co.: Pingree Park, 2960 msm, 25 Sept. 1980, [Rolston 80114), !Hermann. Calliergon megalophyllum Mikutowicz COLO specimen so reported is C. richardsonii, fide Crum. Calliergon richardsonii (Mitten) Kindberg WEBER73B. Campyliadelphus (Lindberg) Chopra, 1975 KANDA75 Campyliadelphus chrysophyllus (Bridel) Kanda HEDEN97. Campylium chrysophyllum (Bridel) J. Lange. WEBER63; WEBER73B; HEDEN97. Hypnum chrysophyllum Bridel. HEDEN97. Campyliadelphus stellatus (Hedwig) Kanda KANDA75. Campylium stellatum (Hedwig) C. Jensen. WEBER73B. Hypnum stellatum Hedwig. HEDEN97. Campylophyllum Fleischer, 1914 HEDEN97 Campylophyllum halleri (Hedwig) Fleischer HEDEN97. Nova Guinea 12, Bot. 2:123.1914. Campylium halleri (Hedwig) Lindberg. WEBER73B; HERMA76. Hypnum halleri Hedwig. HEDEN97. Campylophyllum hispidulum (Bridel) Hedenäs HEDEN97. Campylium hispidulum (Bridel) Mitten. WEBER63,73B; HEDEN97. Hypnum hispidulum Bridel. HEDEN97. Cratoneuron (Sullivant) Spruce, 1867 OCHYR89 Cratoneuron filicinum (Hedwig) Spruce WEBER73B. Drepanocladus (C. Müller) Roth, 1899 HEDEN97 Nomen conserv. Drepanocladus aduncus (Hedwig) Warnstorf WEBER73B.
    [Show full text]
  • Dendrocryphaea
    DENDROCRYPHAEA Johannes Enroth1 Dendrocryphaea Paris & Schimp. ex Broth., in H.G.A. & K.A.E.Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. 1(3): 743 (1905); from the Greek dendron (a tree), in reference to the relatively robust plants of this genus and their similarity to Cryphaea. Lecto: D. gorveana (Mont.) Paris & Schimp. Dendrocryphaea is an almost exclusively Southern Hemisphere genus. Four of the six species occur in continental South American, one is endemic to the Juan Fernández Islands in the south-eastern Pacific Ocean, and one is Australian. Plants typically grow on rocks or tree roots along creeks and are at least periodically submerged. References Enroth, J. (1995), Taxonomy of Cyptodon, with notes on Dendrocryphaea and selected Australasian species of Cryphaea (Cryphaeaceae, Bryopsida), Fragm. Flor. Geobot. 40: 133– 152. Griffin, D. III, Gradstein, S.R. & Aguirre, J. (1982), Studies on Colombian cryptogams XVII. On a new antipodal element in the neotropical páramos – Dendrocryphaea latifolia sp. nov. (Musci), Acta Bot. Neerl. 31: 175. Dendrocryphaea tasmanica (Mitt.) Broth., in H.G.A.Engler & K.A.E.Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. 1(3): 744 (1905) Cryphaea tasmanica Mitt., Fl. Tasman. 2: 204 (1859). T: Jackey’s Plain Creek, Tas., on rocks, W.Archer s.n.; iso: NY (2 specimens). Illustrations: V.F.Brotherus, op. cit. 737, fig. 551F–H; G.A.M. Scott & I.G.Stone, The Mosses of Southern Australia 351, pl. 66 (1976), as Cryphaea tasmanica; J.Enroth, op. cit. 146, fig. 4g–m. Plants rheophytic, mostly epilithic, relatively robust and rigid, often dusky dark green to blackish, unbranched or sparingly branched. Stem leaves c.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of Hypnales (Bryophyta) Inferred from ITS2 Sequence-Structure Data Benjamin Merget, Matthias Wolf*
    Merget and Wolf BMC Research Notes 2010, 3:320 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/3/320 SHORT REPORT Open Access A molecular phylogeny of Hypnales (Bryophyta) inferred from ITS2 sequence-structure data Benjamin Merget, Matthias Wolf* Abstract Background: Hypnales comprise over 50% of all pleurocarpous mosses. They provide a young radiation complicating phylogenetic analyses. To resolve the hypnalean phylogeny, it is necessary to use a phylogenetic marker providing highly variable features to resolve species on the one hand and conserved features enabling a backbone analysis on the other. Therefore we used highly variable internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) sequences and conserved secondary structures, as deposited with the ITS2 Database, simultaneously. Findings: We built an accurate and in parts robustly resolved large scale phylogeny for 1,634 currently available hypnalean ITS2 sequence-structure pairs. Conclusions: Profile Neighbor-Joining revealed a possible hypnalean backbone, indicating that most of the hypnalean taxa classified as different moss families are polyphyletic assemblages awaiting taxonomic changes. Background encompassing a total of 1,634 species in order to test Pleurocarpous mosses, which are mainly found in tropi- the hypothesis that the ITS2 sequence-structure can be cal forests, account for more than 50% of all moss spe- used to determine the phylogeny of Hypnales and to cies [1,2]. Brotherus in 1925 used morphological resolve especially its phylogenetic backbone. A rapid characters to partition the pleurocarpous into three radiation in the early history of pleurocarpous mosses orders. These were Leucodontales (= Isobryales), Hoo- has resulted in low molecular diversity generally, but keriales and Hypnobryales (= Hypnales) [3]. Later mole- particularly in the order Hypnales [5,7].
    [Show full text]
  • Endemic Genera of Bryophytes of North America (North of Mexico)
    Preslia, Praha, 76: 255–277, 2004 255 Endemic genera of bryophytes of North America (north of Mexico) Endemické rody mechorostů Severní Ameriky Wilfred Borden S c h o f i e l d Dedicated to the memory of Emil Hadač Department of Botany, University Boulevard 3529-6270, Vancouver B. C., Canada V6T 1Z4, e-mail: [email protected] Schofield W. B. (2004): Endemic genera of bryophytes of North America (north of Mexico). – Preslia, Praha, 76: 255–277. There are 20 endemic genera of mosses and three of liverworts in North America, north of Mexico. All are monotypic except Thelia, with three species. General ecology, reproduction, distribution and nomenclature are discussed for each genus. Distribution maps are provided. The Mexican as well as Neotropical genera of bryophytes are also noted without detailed discussion. K e y w o r d s : bryophytes, distribution, ecology, endemic, liverworts, mosses, reproduction, North America Introduction Endemism in bryophyte genera of North America (north of Mexico) appears not to have been discussed in detail previously. Only the mention of genera is included in Schofield (1980) with no detail presented. Distribution maps of several genera have appeared in scattered publications. The present paper provides distribution maps of all endemic bryophyte genera for the region and considers the biology and taxonomy of each. When compared to vascular plants, endemism in bryophyte genera in the region is low. There are 20 genera of mosses and three of liverworts. The moss families Andreaeobryaceae, Pseudoditrichaceae and Theliaceae and the liverwort family Gyrothyraceae are endemics; all are monotypic. A total of 16 families of mosses and three of liverworts that possess endemic genera are represented.
    [Show full text]