DOCSLIB.ORG

Arming the Slaves: from Classical Times to the Modern Age – Edited by Christopher Leslie Brown and Philip D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Afro-American Studies Faculty Publication Series Afro-American Studies 2008 Arming the Slaves: From Classical Times to the Modern Age – Edited by Christopher Leslie Brown and Philip D. Morgan Manisha Sinha University of Massachusetts - Amherst, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/afroam_faculty_pubs Part of the African American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Sinha, Manisha, "Arming the Slaves: From Classical Times to the Modern Age – Edited by Christopher Leslie Brown and Philip D. Morgan" (2008). The Historian. 99. 10.1111/j.1540-6563.2008.00221_68.x This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Afro-American Studies at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Afro-American Studies Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © 2008 Phi Alpha Theta BOOK REVIEWS EDITORIAL OFFICE: Elliott Hall IV, Ohio Wesleyan University; Delaware, OH 43015. TELEPHONE: 740-368-3642. Facsimile: 740-368-3643. E-MAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] WEB ADDRESS: http://go.owu.edu/~brhistor EDITOR RICHARD SPALL Ohio Wesleyan University REGIONAL SUB-EDITORS Robert Dietle Richard B. Allen (Modern Western Europe) (Africa, Middle East, and South Asia) Western Kentucky University Framingham State College Douglas R. Bisson Betty Dessants (Early Modern Europe) (United States Since 1865) Belmont University Shippensburg University Helen S. Hundley Nigel Kennell & Stefanie Kennell (Russia and Eastern Europe) (Ancient World) Wichita State University Memorial University of Newfoundland Jose C. Moya Paulette L. Pepin (Latin America) (Medieval Europe) University of California at Los Angeles University of New Haven Susan Mitchell Sommers Richard Spall (Britain and the Empire) (Historiography) Saint Vincent College Ohio Wesleyan University Sally Hadden Peter Worthing (United States) (East Asia and the Pacific) Florida State University Texas Christian University STUDENT EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS SENIOR ASSISTANTS Jennifer Kirsop Ryan Jarvis Scarlett Rebman Kara Reiter Kaleigh Felisberto Colin Magruder Abraham Gustavson Ryan Colopy Patrick O’Connor Jesse Hysell Janna Dagley Alex Branstool Lauren McCullough Sean Kennedy Zak Gomes Greg Stull Mark Lovering Troy Jeffrey Eric Francis Ben Malecki Olivia Talbott WORD PROCESSING:LAURIE GEORGE &VALERIE HAMILL 516 THE H ISTORIAN REVIEW ESSAY “FASHION AND FABRIC:NEW HISTORIES OF CLOTHES MARKETING IN MODERN BRITAIN.” Fashion for the People: A History of Clothing at Marks & Spencer. By Rachel Worth. (New York, N.Y.: Berg, 2007. Pp. xii, 155. $89.95.) The National Fabric: Fashion, Britishness, Globalization. By Alison Goodrum. (New York, N.Y.: Berg, 2005. Pp. xi, 243. $89.95.) Nationality in dress is the visual manifestation of a communal cultural identity, often idealistic and nostalgic but rarely conforming to individual realities. Most historians of dress are uncomfortable with such a concept, which lends itself all too easily to stereotype and fails to include another crucial factor in social identity, that of class. No discussion of British society, culture, or history can escape the issue of social class, which proves to be an underlining theme in these recent publications. Local distinction in sartorial style is a phenomenon countering the globalization of clothing manufacture that has resulted in the “homogenization” of contemporary fashion and a worldwide flood of standardized jeans, T-shirts, etc. Both books under review examine how British garment industries created fashions to be sold within Britain and beyond and discuss how what appealed to Britons might or might not sell to the Americans, French, and Japanese, whose concept of “Britishness” proved to be something quite different. Alison Goodrum’s The National Fabric is the less satisfying of the two books, retaining large chunks of what appears to be an undigested Ph.D. thesis, particu- larly chapter two. The excessive theorizing, in keeping with much literature on the subject of cultural studies, will be of little interest to readers outside the field of fashion history, and specialists in dress and culture will have read it all before in every other fashion book published by Berg. The title is slightly misleading; the book is not a general assessment of dress, nationality, and globalization in Britain, but an examination of these in the context of two specific companies and how each one’s interpretation of “Britishness” sells within and outside Britain. Mul- berry, under the direction of Roger Saul, has based its aesthetic on a stereotype of the British upper class in the 1930s: the tweeds, the leather, the tailoring, the floral dresses, the “huntin’, fishin’, shootin’ ” gear (77). Goodrum’s analysis illustrates that although such a look has had huge and perennial appeal to foreign markets, it has been less reliable commercially on the home front, for within Britain the attraction of such elitist nostalgia is limited. Mulberry had great success in the B OOK R EVIEWS 517 1980s as the “faux Sloane” look sold well to new-moneyed youth, but by the 1990s, opposing strands in the nation’s sartorial narrative reappeared and Mulberry experienced financial difficulties at home while continuing to sell well abroad. The author’s choice of the designer Paul Smith is welcome in the dialogue on fashion, which focuses predominantly on women’s dress. Paul Smith is unique with his roots in and continued emphasis on men’s fashion, his financial success within and beyond Britain, and his commercial endurance over two decades of changing fashion. Paul Smith’s background is middle class, and he does not take the romanticism of aristocratic dress at all seriously, although he clearly recog- nizes its appeal. His style cleverly embraces the stereotypes of English tailoring and country-garden associations, but manages to imbue them with elements of eccentricity and originality attractive to British, as well as foreign, customers. Both Mulberry and Paul Smith price their wares at the high end of the market; the latter’s shirts sell for £95 (about $200), while Mulberry’s customers include Madonna and Victoria Beckham. Goodrum’s analysis excels by including hard financial evidence, discussions of both companies’ style and clientele, an exami- nation of advertising, and interviews with Roger Saul and Paul Smith. Particularly commendable is her investigation of the health of the British fashion industry as a whole. New Labour’s “Cool Britannia” spin is exposed for its utter hypocrisy— politicians hobnobbing with fashion designers and pop stars, all the while starving the British garment industry and young fashion graduates of financial support and commercial incentives. Rachel Worth’s Fashion for the People examines the industry from a different perspective, the democratization of fashion by the company Marks & Spencer, and offers interesting comparisons with and echoes of the story related by Goodrum’s The National Fabric. Worth’s book is an engaging read, her argu- ments are well developed in a lucid style with excellent use of source material. The author’s research is based on the extensive archives held by Marks & Spencer, an exceptional treasure in a world where few businesses bother to document them- selves and even fewer commercial archives survive. Michael Marks began selling accessories and sewing notions in a market stall in Manchester in the 1880s. Astute business practice and competitively priced essentials led to the incorporation with partner Tom Spencer in 1903 and the creation of Marks & Spencer. By the 1930s, food and clothing, in particular women’s dress, were their most profitable commodities. Michael Marks’s son, Simon, toured the United States in 1924, where he studied the manufacturing and merchandising of ready-to-wear clothing and set about revolutionizing Marks & 518 THE H ISTORIAN Spencer on his return. The Marks & Spencer archive documents the establishment of a textile laboratory and a design department in the 1930s; the company was the first in Britain to recognize the importance of innovation in both materials and style, and that excellence in these two fields was interdependent. All of the new man-made textiles were tested and developed by Marks & Spencer, as well as new dyestuffs, and they pioneered consistency in lighting, display, and monitoring stock and sales. Until World War II, the company’s primary market was the working class, providing affordable, simplified versions of fashionable dress. Worth argues that after World War II, the shift in the Marks & Spencer customer base from working to middle class reflects the overall improvement of living standards in Britain. With this change in the social circumstances of their clientele came a new rela- tionship with fashion, which Marks & Spencer has negotiated in a variety of ways, such as seasonal collaborations with name designers (including Paul Smith) and the use of couture fashion models Claudia Schiffer and Linda Evangelista in their advertising. The Marks & Spencer story provides another angle on “Britishness” and dress. In offering fashion to the masses, Marks & Spencer came to personify British dress within Britain. Their tailored suits, knitwear, simple shirts, and dresses, once watered-down versions of 1930s or 1950s fashionable daywear, became classics in their own right, and even, in decades when the nostalgia for English simplicity waxed,
Recommended publications
  • How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics

    How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics

    GETTY CORUM IMAGES/SAMUEL How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Tracing the origins of white supremacist ideas 13 How did this start, and how can it end? 16 Conclusion 17 About the author and acknowledgments 18 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is living through a moment of profound and positive change in attitudes toward race, with a large majority of citizens1 coming to grips with the deeply embedded historical legacy of racist structures and ideas. The recent protests and public reaction to George Floyd’s murder are a testament to many individu- als’ deep commitment to renewing the founding ideals of the republic. But there is another, more dangerous, side to this debate—one that seeks to rehabilitate toxic political notions of racial superiority, stokes fear of immigrants and minorities to inflame grievances for political ends, and attempts to build a notion of an embat- tled white majority which has to defend its power by any means necessary. These notions, once the preserve of fringe white nationalist groups, have increasingly infiltrated the mainstream of American political and cultural discussion, with poi- sonous results. For a starting point, one must look no further than President Donald Trump’s senior adviser for policy and chief speechwriter, Stephen Miller. In December 2019, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch published a cache of more than 900 emails2 Miller wrote to his contacts at Breitbart News before the 2016 presidential election.
  • Reflections on Russell Kirk Lee Trepanier Saginaw Valley State University

    Reflections on Russell Kirk Lee Trepanier Saginaw Valley State University

    Russell Kirk: A Centennial Symposium Reflections on Russell Kirk Lee Trepanier Saginaw Valley State University A century has passed since the birth of Russell Kirk (1918-94), one of the principal founders of the post-World War II conservative revival in the United States.1 This symposium examines Kirk’s legacy with a view to his understanding of constitutional law and the American Founding. But before we examine these essays, it is worth a moment to review Kirk’s life, thought, and place in American conservatism. Russell Kirk was born and raised in Michigan and obtained his B.A. in history at Michigan State University and his M.A. at Duke Univer- sity, where he studied John Randolph of Roanoke and discovered the writings of Edmund Burke.2 His book Randolph of Roanoke: A Study in Conservative Thought (1951) would endure as one of his most important LEE TREPANIER is Professor of Political Science at Saginaw Valley State University. He is also the editor of Lexington Books’ series “Politics, Literature, and Film” and of the aca- demic website VoegelinView. 1 I would like to thank the McConnell Center at the University of Louisville for sponsoring a panel related to this symposium at the 2018 American Political Science Conference and Zachary German for his constructive comments on these papers. I also would like to thank Richard Avramenko of the Center for the Study of Liberal Democracy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Saginaw Valley State University for supporting my sabbatical, which enabled me to write this article and organize this symposium for Humanitas.
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    http://www.ucalgary.ca/hic • ISSN 1492-7810 2010/11 • Vol. 9, No. 1 Whittaker Chambers: The Lonely Voice of Tragedy on the Postwar Right Hyrum Lewis Abstract In historical discourse, Whittaker Chambers has too easily been lumped in with other midcentury conservative anti- communists. While those on the right have held him up as a hero in the American struggle for victory against “godless communism” and those on the left see him as exemplary of the excesses and damaging overzealousness of the early Cold War, Chambers defies such simplistic categorization. His subtle, nuanced thought differed considerably from that of other conservative intellectuals of the time and drew from sources outside the standard conservative canon. Thus, this despairing existentialist became an inspiration and a model for the America Right even as he differed with those he inspired on philosophical essentials. Historians commonly remember Whittaker Chambers as the central witness in one of the most important spy cases of the twentieth century and as one of the founders and icons of conservative anti-communism. Born in 1901 and raised in a middle-class Long Island home, Chambers went off to Columbia University as a young man, but then dropped out to join the communist underground. In the late 1930s, disillusioned by Stalin’s purges and the Nazi-Soviet pact, Chambers defected from communism, underwent a religious conversion, moved to a Maryland farm, and took a job as a book reviewer, foreign affairs columnist, and senior editor at Time magazine where he became one of the leading anti-communist journalists in America.
  • Andrew J. Bacevich

    Andrew J. Bacevich

    ANDREW J. BACEVICH Department of International Relations Boston University 154 Bay State Road Boston, Massachusetts 02215 Telephone (617) 358-0194 email: [email protected] CURRENT POSITION Boston University Professor of History and International Relations EDUCATION Princeton University, Ph.D. American Diplomatic History, 1982 Princeton University, M.A. American History, 1977 United States Military Academy, West Point, B.S., 1969 FELLOWSHIPS The American Academy in Berlin Berlin Prize Fellow, 2004 The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Visiting Fellow of Strategic Studies, 1992-1993 The John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University National Security Fellow, 1987-1988 Council on Foreign Relations, New York International Affairs Fellow, 1984-1985 PREVIOUS APPOINTMENTS Boston University Director, Center for International Relations, 1998-2005 The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Professorial Lecturer; Executive Director, Foreign Policy Institute, 1993-1998 School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Professorial Lecturer, Department of Political Science, 1995-1997 United States Military Academy, West Point Assistant Professor, Department of History, 1977-1980 1 PUBLICATIONS Books and Monographs Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War. New York: Metropolitan Books (2010); audio edition (2010). The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism. New York: Metropolitan Books (2008); audio edition (2008); Chinese and German editions (2009); Polish edition (2010); Japanese, Korean, and Turkish editions (forthcoming). The Long War: A New History of U. S. National Security Policy since World War II. New York: Columbia University Press (2007). (editor). The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War. New York: Oxford University Press (2005); History Book Club selection; 2005 Lannan Literary Award for an Especially Notable Book; Chinese edition (2008).
  • Group Research, Inc. Records, 1955-1996 MS# 0525 ©2007 Columbia University Library

    Group Research, Inc. Records, 1955-1996 MS# 0525 ©2007 Columbia University Library

    Group Research, Inc. Records, 1955-1996 MS# 0525 ©2007 Columbia University Library This document is converted from a legacy finding aid. We provide this Internet-accessible document in the hope that users interested in this collection will find this information useful. At some point in the future, should time and funds permit, this finding aid may be updated. SUMMARY INFORMATION Creator Group Research, Inc. Title and dates Group Research, Inc. Records, 1955-1996 Abstract Founded by Wesley McCune and based in Washington DC until ceasing operations in the mid-1990s, Group Research Inc. collected materials that focus on the right-wing and span four decades. The collection contains correspondence, memos, reports, card files, audio-visual material, printed matter, clippings, etc. Size 215 linear ft. (512 document boxes; Map Case 14/16/05 and flat box #727) Call number MS# 0525 Location Columbia University Butler Library, 6th Floor Rare Book and Manuscript Library 535 West 114th Street Page 1 of 142 Group Research Records Box New York, NY 10027 Language(s) of material English History of Group Research, Inc. A successful journalist for such magazines as Newsweek, Time, Life and Changing Times as well as a staff member of several government agencies and government-related organizations, Wesley McCune founded Group Research Inc. in 1962. Based in Washington DC until ceasing operations in the mid-1990s Group Research Inc. collected materials that focus on the right--wing and span four decades. The resulting Group Research archive includes information about and by right-wing organizations and activists in the form of publications correspondence pamphlets reports newspaper Congressional Record and magazine clippings and other ephemera.
  • Imagination Movers: the Construction of Conservative Counter-Narratives in Reaction to Consensus Liberalism

    Imagination Movers: the Construction of Conservative Counter-Narratives in Reaction to Consensus Liberalism

    Imagination Movers: The Construction of Conservative Counter-Narratives in Reaction to Consensus Liberalism Seth James Bartee Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Social, Political, Ethical, and Cultural Thought Francois Debrix, Chair Matthew Gabriele Matthew Dallek James Garrison Timothy Luke February 19, 2014 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: conservatism, imagination, historicism, intellectual history counter-narrative, populism, traditionalism, paleo-conservatism Imagination Movers: The Construction of Conservative Counter-Narratives in Reaction to Consensus Liberalism Seth James Bartee ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to explore what exactly bound post-Second World War American conservatives together. Since modern conservatism’s recent birth in the United States in the last half century or more, many historians have claimed that both anti-communism and capitalism kept conservatives working in cooperation. My contention was that the intellectual founder of postwar conservatism, Russell Kirk, made imagination, and not anti-communism or capitalism, the thrust behind that movement in his seminal work The Conservative Mind. In The Conservative Mind, published in 1953, Russell Kirk created a conservative genealogy that began with English parliamentarian Edmund Burke. Using Burke and his dislike for the modern revolutionary spirit, Kirk uncovered a supposedly conservative seed that began in late eighteenth-century England, and traced it through various interlocutors into the United States that culminated in the writings of American expatriate poet T.S. Eliot. What Kirk really did was to create a counter-narrative to the American liberal tradition that usually began with the French Revolution and revolutionary figures such as English-American revolutionary Thomas Paine.
  • National Review</Em>

    National Review</Em>

    Linfield University DigitalCommons@Linfield Faculty Publications 2007 Editing Conservatism: How National Review Magazine Framed and Mobilized a Political Movement Susan Currie Sivek Linfield College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/mscmfac_pubs Part of the Journalism Studies Commons, and the Social Influence and oliticalP Communication Commons DigitalCommons@Linfield Citation Sivek, Susan Currie, "Editing Conservatism: How National Review Magazine Framed and Mobilized a Political Movement" (2007). Faculty Publications. Accepted Version. Submission 4. https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/mscmfac_pubs/4 This Accepted Version is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It is brought to you for free via open access, courtesy of DigitalCommons@Linfield, with permission from the rights-holder(s). Your use of this Accepted Version must comply with the Terms of Use for material posted in DigitalCommons@Linfield, or with other stated terms (such as a Creative Commons license) indicated in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, or if you have questions about permitted uses, please contact [email protected]. EDITING CONSERVATISM 1 Running head: EDITING CONSERVATISM Editing Conservatism: How National Review Magazine Framed and Mobilized a Political Movement Submitted to Mass Communication & Society Revised September 7, 2007 Abstract (100 words): This paper examines how National Review magazine helped to spark the 1960s American conservative movement through its particular framing of conservatism, and how the magazine has worked to sustain that influence even until today. Using research on frame alignment in social movements, the first issue of National Review is analyzed and placed in context with contemporaneous events and publications. The creation and editing of the magazine is found to parallel the creative and deliberate framing of the early conservative movement.
  • Russell Kirk and the Rhetoric of Order Eric Grabowsky

    Russell Kirk and the Rhetoric of Order Eric Grabowsky

    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Summer 2010 Russell Kirk and the Rhetoric of Order Eric Grabowsky Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grabowsky, E. (2010). Russell Kirk and the Rhetoric of Order (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/595 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RUSSELL KIRK AND THE RHETORIC OF ORDER A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Eric Grabowsky August 2010 Copyright by Eric Grabowsky 2010 RUSSELL KIRK AND THE RHETORIC OF ORDER By Eric Grabowsky Approved July 9, 2010 ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. Janie M. Harden Fritz Dr. Calvin Troup Associate Professor, Department of Associate Professor, Department of Communication & Rhetorical Studies Communication & Rhetorical Studies (Dissertation Director) (First Reader) ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. Richard Thames Dr. Ronald C. Arnett, Chair Associate Professor, Department of Department of Communication & Communication & Rhetorical Studies Rhetorical Studies (Second Reader) ________________________________ Dr. Christopher M. Duncan, Dean McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts iii ABSTRACT RUSSELL KIRK AND THE RHETORIC OF ORDER By Eric Grabowsky August 2010 Dissertation supervised by Dr. Janie M. Harden Fritz The corpus of historically-minded “man of letters” and twentieth century leader among conservatives, Russell Amos Kirk, prompts one to reflect upon a realist rhetoric of order for conservative discourse in particular and public argumentation in general.
  • The Fusionism of Frank S. Meyer Red Beginnings F

    The Fusionism of Frank S. Meyer Red Beginnings F

    Minchew 1 Adam Minchew 27 August 2010 Between Traditionalists and Libertarians: The Fusionism of Frank S. Meyer Red Beginnings Frank Strauss Meyer was born into a wealthy, Reformed Jewish household on 9 May 1909. Although little is known about his early years, Meyer suffered from chronic illness and spent much of his time confined to the indoors. Restricted as he was by his parents and his illnesses, Meyer found solace in intellectual pursuits and read voraciously. As a teenager, Meyer developed an interest in history and politics and apparently saw himself as a progressive; later in his life, Meyer admitted to hanging a poster of Woodrow Wilson on his bedroom door.1 Meyer attended private school at Newark Academy and through hard work, gained admission to Princeton University at the age of seventeen. Although intellectually precocious, continued to be dogged by sickness and left Princeton University permanently in 1928. Meyer’s parents, unsure of their son’s future, kept him at home to recover, but eventually decided in the summer of 1930 to send him to England to further his education, particularly in the disciplines in which he showed most interest: the classics, English literature, and economics.2 But the progressive, economically vibrant and hopeful decade of the 1920’s gave way to the Great Depression of the 1930s. World War I had transformed many nationalist, idealistic young people into mature skeptics and political activists. They sought to remake the world according to one or another ideology that would prevent another slaughter on a global scale. The most severe economic downturn in the history of the West prepared the way, however, for a global conflict that would dwarf World War I in bloodletting.
  • The Disinformation Age

    The Disinformation Age

    Steven Livingston W. LanceW. Bennett EDITED BY EDITED BY Downloaded from terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1F4751119C7C4693E514C249E0F0F997THE DISINFORMATION AGE https://www.cambridge.org/core Politics, and Technology, Disruptive Communication in the United States the United in https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms . IP address: 170.106.202.126 . , on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:34:36 , subject to the Cambridge Core Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.126, on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:34:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1F4751119C7C4693E514C249E0F0F997 The Disinformation Age The intentional spread of falsehoods – and attendant attacks on minorities, press freedoms, and the rule of law – challenge the basic norms and values upon which institutional legitimacy and political stability depend. How did we get here? The Disinformation Age assembles a remarkable group of historians, political scientists, and communication scholars to examine the historical and political origins of the post-fact information era, focusing on the United States but with lessons for other democracies. Bennett and Livingston frame the book by examining decades-long efforts by political and business interests to undermine authoritative institutions, including parties, elections, public agencies, science, independent journalism, and civil society groups. The other distinguished scholars explore the historical origins and workings of disinformation, along with policy challenges and the role of the legacy press in improving public communication. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. W. Lance Bennett is Professor of Political Science and Ruddick C.
  • 'Irritable Mental Gestures': Russell Kirk's Challenge to Liberalism

    'Irritable Mental Gestures': Russell Kirk's Challenge to Liberalism

    More than ‘Irritable Mental Gestures’: Russell Kirk’s Challenge to Liberalism, 1950–1960 Bradley J. Birzer Hillsdale College Liberalism “is now fading out of the world,” Russell Kirk pro- Philosophically, claimed in 1955 in the liberal Catholic periodical Commonweal. Kirk wrote, “And I believe that the ephemeral character of the liberal move- liberalism lacked staying ment is in consequence of the fact that liberalism’s mythical roots power. always were feeble, and now are nearly dead.” For Kirk, and many Christian Humanists of the twentieth century, liberalism had been an evanescent philosophy. It had taken for granted the virtues from the Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian traditions without recognizing their historical or cultural prerequisites, and it had envisioned society as beginning in a social contract. Neither practice, thought Kirk, could give a liberalism any real staying power. Therefore, he argued, “Liberalism is expiring under our very eyes for lack of the higher imagination.”1 For Kirk, it would be hard to find something more damning to write. Without imagi- nation, Kirk noted in his many writings, the person and civiliza- tion became barren and meaningless, a wasteland of the inhumane and the corrupt. “The modern ‘liberal’ world, as I have come to understand it,” Kirk wrote in The New York Times in 1956, “is mak- ing its way straight toward what C. S. Lewis calls ‘the abolition of BRADLEY J. BIRZER is the Russell Amos Kirk Chair in History and Director of the American Studies Program at Hillsdale College. 1 Russell Kirk, “The Dissolution of Liberalism,” Commonweal (January 7, 1955): 374.
  • THE PERILS of PLURALISM by STUART WEXLER a Thesis

    THE PERILS of PLURALISM by STUART WEXLER a Thesis

    THE PERILS OF PLURALISM By STUART WEXLER A thesis submitted to Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Program in Political Science written under the direction of Beth Leech and Andrew Murphy and approved by ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey January, 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS The Perils of Pluralism By STUART WEXLER Thesis Directors: Beth Leech and Andrew Murphy Many scholars believe that James Madison was one of the earliest proponents of political pluralism. In Federalist No. 10 Madison argued that an extended republic would minimize the danger of majority factions by allowing various interests to compete and compromise with each other. Nearly a century later, with the proliferation of minority factions-- interest groups-- Madison’s ideas enjoyed a renaissance among scholars. Some, like Arthur Bentley, took pressure group theory even further, arguing that there was no such thing as a national interest, that whatever policy emerges from the interplay of interests, by its nature, exemplifies the relative weight of these interests in society. Yet others saw the growing number of special interests as a threat to the common good. Madison insisted that minority factions not possibly threaten the national interest—they would simply be outvoted by way of the “republican principle.” More recently, a new group of scholars, neo-pluralists, have described an American system similar to Madison. This paper argues that while the neo-pluralists, and Madison, provide a model of government that accurately captures much of the American system, they fail to take note of one key way that interest groups can exploit the American political system.