Assessment of the Yellowfin Sole Stock in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Thomas K

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessment of the Yellowfin Sole Stock in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Thomas K Assessment of the yellowfin sole stock in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Thomas K. Wilderbuer, Daniel G. Nichol and James Ianelli Executive Summary Summary of Changes in Assessment Inputs Changes to the input data 1) 2016 fishery age composition. 2) 2016 survey age composition. 3) 2017 trawl survey biomass point estimate and standard error. 4) Estimate of the discarded and retained portions of the 2015 catch. 5) Estimate of total catch made through the end of 2017. Catch of 150,000 t assumed for 2018 and 2019 projection. Changes to the assessment methodology No changes were made to this assessment. Summary of Results The assessment updates last year’s with results and management quantities that are higher than the 2016 assessment primarily due to 1) including 2016 fishery weight-at-age information, 2) including two more years in the spawner-recruit time-series, and 3) a lower estimated survey catchability. Yellowfin sole continue to be well-above BMSY and the annual harvest remains below the ABC level. The female spawning stock is in a slow downward trend. As estimated or As estimated or specified last year for: recommended this year for: Quantity 2017 2018 2018 2019 M (natural mortality rate) 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Tier 1a 1a 1a 1a Projected total (age 6+) biomass (t) 2,290,000 2,202,300 2,553,100 2,460,700 Female spawning biomass (t) 778,600 770,900 895,000 890,000 Projected B0 1,202,700 1,204,000 BMSY 424,000 456,000 FOFL 0.125 0.125 0.12 0.12 maxFABC 0.114 0.114 0.109 0.109 FABC 0.114 0.114 0.109 0.109 OFL (t) 287,000 276,000 306,700 295,600 maxABC (t) 260,800 250,800 277,500 267,500 ABC (t) 260,800 250,800 277,500 267,500 As determined last year for: As determined this year for: Status 2015 2016 2016 2017 Overfishing No n/a No n/a Overfished n/a No n/a No Approaching overfished n/a No n/a No Projections are based on estimated catches of 150,000 t used in place of maximum ABC for 2018 and 2019. Responses to SSC and Plan Team Comments on Assessments in General General comments for all assessments: SSC encourages assessment authors to adopt the current model naming convention. This assessment now complies with the desired naming convention. Responses to SSC and Plan Team Comments Specific to this Assessment The yellowfin sole stock assessment has set an example for its inclusion of ecosystem factors in the assessment. Temperature was found to be related to survey catchability and growth. Interestingly, after conducting a field experiment to further examine relationships between temperature and catchability, it was found that survey biomass is more strongly correlated to wave height than temperature, which is in turn confounded with temperature. The SSC supports the approach outlined in the SAFE to further elucidate the effects of sea state and/or bottom temperature on q, noting that these covariates may act on the assessment in different ways (i.e., availability versus gear efficiency). If an effect of wave height on catchability is confirmed, implying that rougher seas adversely affect the ability of the trawl to tend the seafloor, then this would beg the question whether other assessed species are similarly affected. So, the outcome of this work has the potential for important, far-reaching implications. The results of last summer's sampling efficiency experiment indicated that sea-state had a much larger effect on yellowfin sole herding, and trawl efficiency in general, than bottom temperature. Dan Nichol looked at the time-series of eastern Bering Sea yellowfin sole biomass estimates and found that they also were strongly correlated to wave height. To confuse things more, wave height was correlated to temperature. 1. The experimental results were analyzed and a paper on wave height effect on yellowfin sole catchability was submitted to Fisheries Bulletin (The effects of wave-induced vessel motion on the geometry of a bottom survey trawl and the herding of yellowfin sole by Somerton, Weinberg, Munro, Rugolo and Wilderbuer, In Review). However, this still does not answer the question of why you find a strong temperature effect on the survey catchability function in the stock assessment model. One possibility is that trawl sampling efficiency is more influenced by waves but yellowfin sole availability to the survey is more influenced by temperature. 2. Dan Nichol has completed a CPUE versus waves analysis back to 2005. Although RACE surveys have recorded sea state data for many years it was not entered into the database earlier than 2005, so Dan will do some hand entry, then repeat the analysis with more years and considering wave height and temperature together in a model. This work is viewed as secondary to the availability research (see #3), given that availability likely has a much greater influence on biomass estimates than sea- state/temperature. 3. Dan Nichol also has made progress toward showing that yellowfin sole availability changes with temperature using sex ratio, based on the notion that males arrive first and leave the spawning areas later than females, and that the timing of annual spawning is temperature-dependent. 4. A CIE review is scheduled for May 2018 for yellowfin sole, northern rock sole and Alaska plaice. We will solicit comments from the expert panel on exploring an additional waves parameter to fit the survey biomass. One ongoing issue with the yellowfin sole assessment is a strong retrospective pattern illustrated by Figure 4.21. More recent assessments tend to yield higher estimates of female spawning biomass. Attempts to determine the cause have been unsuccessful so far. The PT suggested that the author consider examining the potential effects of q and M on the retrospective patterns. The SSC encourages ongoing efforts to understand this phenomenon so that appropriate model adjustments can be made. The SSC also recommends updating weight-at-age with each assessment as new data become available annually. Finally, the SSC looks forward to the use of the adopted model naming convention in next year’s yellowfin sole assessment. The retrospective comment is addressed in this assessment under the retrospective analysis heading. Weight-at-age is routinely updated, both for the fishery and the survey. Introduction The yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera) is one of the most abundant flatfish species in the eastern Bering Sea (EBS) and currently is the target of the largest flatfish fishery in the world. They inhabit the EBS shelf and are considered one stock. Abundance in the Aleutian Islands region is negligible. Yellowfin sole are distributed in North American waters from off British Columbia, Canada, (approx. lat. 49o N) to the Chukchi Sea (about lat. 70o N) and south along the Asian coast to about lat. 35o N off the South Korean coast in the Sea of Japan. Adults exhibit a benthic lifestyle and occupy separate winter, spawning and summertime feeding distributions on the eastern Bering Sea shelf. From over-winter grounds near the shelf margins, adults begin a migration onto the inner shelf in April or early May each year for spawning and feeding. The directed fishery has typically occurred from winter through autumn (Wilderbuer et al. 1992). Yellowfin sole are managed as a single stock in the BSAI management area as there is presently no evidence of stock structure. Fishery Yellowfin sole have annually been caught with bottom trawls on the Bering Sea shelf since the fishery began in 1954 and were overexploited by foreign fisheries in 1959-62 when catches averaged 404,000 t annually (Fig. 4.1, top panel). As a result of reduced stock abundance, catches declined to an annual average of 117,800 t from 1963-71 and further declined to an annual average of 50,700 t from 1972-77. The lower yield in this latter period was partially due to the discontinuation of the U.S.S.R. fishery. In the early 1980s, after the stock condition had improved, catches again increased reaching a peak of over 227,000 t in 1985. During the 1980s, there was also a major transition in the characteristics of the fishery. Yellowfin sole were traditionally taken exclusively by foreign fisheries and these fisheries continued to dominate through 1984. However, U.S. fisheries developed rapidly during the 1980s in the form of joint ventures, and during the last half of the decade began to dominate and then take all of the catch as the foreign fisheries were phased out of the EBS. Since 1990, only domestic harvesting and processing has occurred. The management of the yellowfin sole fishery changed significantly in 2008 with the implementation of Amendment 80 to the BSAI Fisheries Management Plan. The Amendment directly allocated fishery resources among BSAI trawl harvesters in consideration of their historic harvest patterns and future harvest needs in order to improve retention and utilization of fishery resources by the non-AFA trawl catcher/processor fleet. This was accomplished by extending the groundfish retention standards to all H&G vessels and also by providing the ability to form cooperatives within the newly formed Amendment 80 sector. In addition, Amendment 80 also mandated additional monitoring requirements which included observer coverage on all hauls, motion-compensating scales for weighing samples, flow scales to obtain accurate catch weight estimates for the entire catch, no mixing of hauls and no on-deck sorting. The partitioning of TAC and PSC (prohibited species catch) among cooperatives has significantly changed the way the annual catch has accumulated (Fig 4.1, bottom panel) and the rate of target catch per bycatch ton.
Recommended publications
  • FISH LIST WISH LIST: a Case for Updating the Canadian Government’S Guidance for Common Names on Seafood
    FISH LIST WISH LIST: A case for updating the Canadian government’s guidance for common names on seafood Authors: Christina Callegari, Scott Wallace, Sarah Foster and Liane Arness ISBN: 978-1-988424-60-6 © SeaChoice November 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY . 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 Findings . 5 Recommendations . 6 INTRODUCTION . 7 APPROACH . 8 Identification of Canadian-caught species . 9 Data processing . 9 REPORT STRUCTURE . 10 SECTION A: COMMON AND OVERLAPPING NAMES . 10 Introduction . 10 Methodology . 10 Results . 11 Snapper/rockfish/Pacific snapper/rosefish/redfish . 12 Sole/flounder . 14 Shrimp/prawn . 15 Shark/dogfish . 15 Why it matters . 15 Recommendations . 16 SECTION B: CANADIAN-CAUGHT SPECIES OF HIGHEST CONCERN . 17 Introduction . 17 Methodology . 18 Results . 20 Commonly mislabelled species . 20 Species with sustainability concerns . 21 Species linked to human health concerns . 23 Species listed under the U .S . Seafood Import Monitoring Program . 25 Combined impact assessment . 26 Why it matters . 28 Recommendations . 28 SECTION C: MISSING SPECIES, MISSING ENGLISH AND FRENCH COMMON NAMES AND GENUS-LEVEL ENTRIES . 31 Introduction . 31 Missing species and outdated scientific names . 31 Scientific names without English or French CFIA common names . 32 Genus-level entries . 33 Why it matters . 34 Recommendations . 34 CONCLUSION . 35 REFERENCES . 36 APPENDIX . 39 Appendix A . 39 Appendix B . 39 FISH LIST WISH LIST: A case for updating the Canadian government’s guidance for common names on seafood 2 GLOSSARY The terms below are defined to aid in comprehension of this report. Common name — Although species are given a standard Scientific name — The taxonomic (Latin) name for a species. common name that is readily used by the scientific In nomenclature, every scientific name consists of two parts, community, industry has adopted other widely used names the genus and the specific epithet, which is used to identify for species sold in the marketplace.
    [Show full text]
  • BSAIF Latfish S Urveillance R Eport 1
    Moody Marine Ltd. BSAI Flatfish Fishery: Surveillance Report 1 2011 First Annual Surveillance Report Bering Sea / Aleutian Islands Flatfish Fisheries: Alaska Plaice Flathead Sole Northern Rock Sole Yellowfin Sole Arrowtooth Flounder Certificate Nos.: Alaska Plaice MML-F-047 Flathead Sole MML-F-050 Northern Rock Sole MML-F-051 Yellowfin Sole MML-F-052 Arrowtooth Flounder MML-F-048 Moody Marine Ltd. Authors: Jake Rice, Don Bowen, Susan Hanna, Paul Knapman Moody Marine Ltd 815 – 99 Wyse Road Dartmouth Nova Scotia B3A 4S5 CANADA Tel: (1) 902 422 4551 Fax: (1) 902 422 9780 Email: [email protected] Web Site: www.moodyint.com FCS 03 v1 Rev 00 Page 1 of 29 Moody Marine Ltd. BSAI Flatfish Fishery: Surveillance Report 1 2011 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION Scope against which the surveillance is undertaken: MSC Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Fishing as applied to the Flatfish Trawl Fishery. Species: Yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera also known as Pleuronectes asper), flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon), arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias), Alaska plaice (Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus) and northern rock sole (Lepidopsetta polyxystra also known as Pleuronectes bilineatus). Area: Bering Sea / Aleutian Islands (BSAI) Methods of capture: Trawl Date of Surveillance Visit: 9-13th May 2011 Initial Certification Date: 22nd January 2010 Certificate No.: Alaska Plaice MML-F-047 Flathead Sole MML-F-050 Northern Rock Sole MML-F-051 Yellowfin Sole MML-F-052 Arrowtooth Flounder MML-F-048 Surveillance stage 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Surveillance team: Lead Auditor: Paul Knapman Team members: Jake Rice, Don Bowen, Susan Hanna Company Name: Alaska Seafood Cooperative c/o Groundfish Forum Address: 4241 21st Ave West Suite 200 Seattle Washington, 98199 Contact 1 Jason Anderson Tel No: +1 206-462-7682 E-mail address: [email protected] FCS 03 v1 Rev 00 Page 2 of 29 Moody Marine Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Sustainability Rating Score
    2017 SUSTAINABILITY RATING SCORE How did Tradex Score for Sustainably Sourced Raw Materials in 2017? VICTORIA, BC, February 28 - THE STATS ARE IN! Our Sustainability Rating Score for 2017 increased to 92 percent for all production of our three SINBAD brands. This means that 92 percent of all raw materials used in the production of our SINBAD, SINBAD Gold, and SINBAD Platinum products in 2017 were harvested from sustainable fisheries. This is up 7 percent from our 2016 score of 85 percent. Tradex uses guidance from Seafood Watch, Ocean Wise, and the Marine Stewardship Council to determine the sustainability status of raw materials. Their ratings are then entered into our inFINite™ Sustainability Production Tracker to arrive at a score out of 100. Below is a breakdown of how sustainable our SINBAD, SINBAD Gold, and SINBAD Platinum brand products measured up by category. 100% Sustainably Harvested Raw Materials in 2017 Below are the species that scored 100% on sourcing from sustainable fisheries Atlantic Cod Chum Salmon Coho Salmon Haddock Ocean Perch Pink Salmon Pink Shrimp Pollock Rock Sole Sockeye Salmon Tilapia Yellowfin Sole Pacific Rockfish Less than 100% Sustainably Harvested Raw Materials in 2017 Below are the species that scored less than 100% on sourcing from sustainable fisheries Species Results Improvement Plan In 2018, whenever possible, Tradex will source from the MSC Certified Alaskan Fishery. Due to high market Pacific Cod 56% of raw materials for demand, Tradex is unable to completely stop sourcing Trawl Caught branded production were Pacific Cod from Russia. Pacific Cod stocks in Russia are FAO 61 - Russia from sustainable fisheries considered to be low and steps towards completing FIP’s for improving data transparency for fisheries management are recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Larvae of Three Arctic Species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae)
    Identification of larvae of three arctic species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae) Morgan S. Busby, Deborah M. Blood & Ann C. Matarese Polar Biology ISSN 0722-4060 Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2153-9 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by 2017. This e- offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2153-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Identification of larvae of three arctic species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae) 1 1 1 Morgan S. Busby • Deborah M. Blood • Ann C. Matarese Received: 28 September 2016 / Revised: 26 June 2017 / Accepted: 27 June 2017 Ó Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract Identification of fish larvae in Arctic marine for L. proboscidea in comparison to the other two species waters is problematic as descriptions of early-life-history provide additional evidence suggesting the genus Limanda stages exist for few species. Our goal in this study is to may be paraphyletic, as has been proposed in other studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Update
    MIXED PROGRESS IN 2008 ALASKA FLATFISH FISHERIES When the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (the Council) cut the 2008 Bering Sea pollock quotas by 28%, it supplemented the total all-species quota in the Bering Sea with major increases to quotas of various flatfish species. Although these flatfish species command lower prices than pollock or Pacific cod, the Council felt increased flatfish quotas could somewhat offset quota holders for the lost pollock revenue. Here is a table showing the 2008 quotas of several major Alaskan groundfish species: ALASKA GROUNDFISH TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH (TAC) 2007-2008 all figures in metric tons (MT) % 2007 2008 change Species BSAI GOA Total BSAI GOA Total Total Pollock 1,413,010 68,307 1,481,317 1,019,010 60,180 1,079,190 (27.1%) Pacific cod 171,000 52,264 223,264 170,720 50,269 220,989 (1.0%) Yellowfin sole 136,000 136,000 225,000 225,000 65.4% Arrowtooth flounder 20,000 43,000 63,000 75,000 43,000 118,000 87.3% Northern rock sole 55,000 55,000 75,000 75,000 36.4% Flathead sole 30,000 9,148 39,148 50,000 11,054 61,054 56.0% Alaska plaice 25,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 100.0% Atka mackerel 63,000 1,500 64,500 60,700 1,500 62,200 (3.6%) All other species 87,315 95,693 183,008 112,915 96,823 209,738 14.6% Total 2,000,325 269,912 2,270,237 1,838,345 262,826 2,101,171 (7.4%) Notes BSAI Bering Sea / Aleutian Islands area GOA Gulf of Alaska area Stalled yellowfin sole fishery Despite the quota increases, trawlers in Alaska have yet to fill their pollock shortfall with flatfish, due mainly to a slow start to the yellowfin sole fishery.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowfin Sole Stock in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Thomas K
    Chapter 4 Assessment of the Yellowfin sole stock in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Thomas K. Wilderbuer, Daniel G. Nichol and James Ianelli Executive Summary Summary of Changes in Assessment Inputs Changes to the input data 1) 2011 fishery age composition. 2) 2011 survey age composition. 3) 2012 trawl survey biomass point estimate and standard error. 4) Estimate of the discarded and retained portions of the 2011 catch. 5) Estimate of total catch made through the end of 2012. Changes to the assessment methodology No changes to the assessment methodology. The assessment updates last year’s with results and management quantities that are very similar to the 2011 assessment. Yellowfin sole continue to be well- above BMSY and the annual harvest is below the ABC level. Summary of Results As estimated or As estimated or specified last year for: recommended this year for: Quantity 2012 2013 2013 2014 M (natural mortality rate) 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Tier 1a 1a 1a 1a Projected total (age 6+) biomass (t) 1,945,000 1,985,000 1,963,000 1,960,000 Female spawning biomass (t) 592,700 604,900 582,300 601,000 Projected B0 954,100 966,900 BMSY 341,000 353,000 FOFL 0.114 0.114 0.112 0.112 maxFABC 0.104 0.104 0.105 0.105 FABC 0.104 0.104 0.105 0.105 OFL (t) 222,000 226,400 220,000 219,000 maxABC (t) 203,000 206,700 206,000 206,000 ABC (t) 203,000 206,700 206,000 206,000 As determined last year for: As determined this year for: Status 2011 2012 2012 2013 Overfishing No No No No Overfished No No No No Approaching overfished No No No No SSC Comments For the BSAI, the SSC’s recommended priorities for CIE reviews are yellowfin sole, northern rock sole, and Greenland turbot.
    [Show full text]
  • Announcement of Full MSC Assessment Alaska Groundfish Fishery
    10051 5th Street N., Suite 105 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2211 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. MRAG-MSC-102-v1 3 April 2014 Announcement of Full MSC Assessment Alaska Groundfish Fishery MRAG Americas, Inc. is pleased to announce that Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) re-assessments of the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea-Aleutian Islands Alaska pollock, Alaska flatfish, and Pacific cod fisheries have begun. The assessment will evaluate the fisheries for compliance with the MSC’s Standard for well- managed and sustainable fisheries. MRAG Americas has determined that these fisheries are in scope. The Clients for this assessment are: 1. Pacific Cod - Bering Sea Aleutian Islands Contact: James Browning Alaska Fishery Development Foundation [email protected] 431 W 7th Avenue, Suite 106 907-276-7315 Anchorage, AK 99501 Species: Pacific Cod 2. Pacific Cod – Gulf of Alaska Contact: James Browning Alaska Fishery Development Foundation Species: Pacific Cod 3. Alaska Flatfish – Bering Sea-Aleutian Islands Contact: Jason Anderson Alaska Seafood Cooperative [email protected] 4241 21st Avenue W, Suite 302 206-462-7690 Seattle, WA 98199 Species: Yellowfin sole; Flathead sole; Arrowtooth flounder Alaska plaice; Northern rock sole; Kamchatka flounder 4. Alaska Flatfish – Gulf of Alaska Contact: Jason Anderson Alaska Seafood Cooperative Species: Flathead sole; Arrowtooth flounder Rex sole; Northern rock sole; Southern rock sole 5. Alaska Pollock – Bering Sea Aleutian Islands Contact: Jim Gilmore At-Sea Processors [email protected] 4039 21st Avenue W, Suite 400 206-285-5139 Seattle, WA 98199 Species: Alaska Pollock 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival of Yellowfin Sole (Limanda Aspera Pallas) in the Northern Part of the Tatar Strait (Sea of Japan) During the Second Half of the 20Th Century
    their behavior in October. Following the arrival of mortality, and fishing, the stock abundance of the cold water, herring migrated westward, forming Korf-Karaginsky herring has decreased. non-mobile stocks at the depth of 180-250 m Moreover, at the present time, hydrological between the Cape of Goven and the Cape of conditions can hardly provide the required Golenischev in December (Fig. 66). biomass of forage zooplankton. This should prolong the feeding period until mid October and Since 1993, there has been no single abundant expand the feeding area. cohort produced by the population. Due to natural Survival of yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera Pallas) in the northern part of the Tatar Strait (Sea of Japan) during the second half of the 20th century Sergey N. Tarasyuk Sakhalin Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, 196 Komsomolskaya Street, Yuzhno- Sakhalinsk, Russia 693023. E-mail: [email protected] The northern part of the Tatar Strait is one of the Yellowfin sole from the shelf zone of western traditional areas where yellowfin sole (Limanda Sakhalin cease annual increments at age 8-9+. aspera Pallas) dominate, averaging 60% of The instantaneous natural mortality rates vary by flounder abundance. The commercial fishery of age decreasing from 0.22 to 0.12 beginning in age- flounder stocks began in 1943. In 1944, their 4 to age-6-8 individuals, respectively, and then catch reached the historical maximum – 10.1 gradually increasing to 0.60 at age 15. The broods thousand tons, but during the following year it become fully available to the fishery beginning at reduced up to 7.4 thousand tons, and a catch per age 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Flounders, Halibuts, Soles Capture Production by Species, Fishing Areas
    101 Flounders, halibuts, soles Capture production by species, fishing areas and countries or areas B-31 Flets, flétans, soles Captures par espèces, zones de pêche et pays ou zones Platijas, halibuts, lenguados Capturas por especies, áreas de pesca y países o áreas Species, Fishing area Espèce, Zone de pêche 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Especie, Área de pesca t t t t t t t t t t Mediterranean scaldfish Arnoglosse de Méditerranée Serrandell Arnoglossus laterna 1,83(01)001,01 MSF 34 Italy - - - - - - - 57 223 123 34 Fishing area total - - - - - - - 57 223 123 37 Italy ... ... ... ... ... ... 447 479 169 403 37 Fishing area total ... ... ... ... ... ... 447 479 169 403 Species total ... ... ... ... ... ... 447 536 392 526 Leopard flounder Rombou léopard Lenguado leopardo Bothus pantherinus 1,83(01)018,05 OUN 51 Bahrain 2 - - 1 1 4 4 F 4 F 4 F 4 F Saudi Arabia 77 80 77 75 74 83 71 79 80 F 74 51 Fishing area total 79 80 77 76 75 87 75 F 83 F 84 F 78 F Species total 79 80 77 76 75 87 75 F 83 F 84 F 78 F Lefteye flounders nei Arnoglosses, rombous nca Rodaballos, rombos, etc. nep Bothidae 1,83(01)XXX,XX LEF 21 USA 1 087 774 566 747 992 759 545 406 633 409 21 Fishing area total 1 087 774 566 747 992 759 545 406 633 409 27 Germany - - - - - - - - 0 - Portugal 136 103 143 125 105 102 87 76 84 105 Spain 134 116 96 56 29 8 12 12 6 5 27 Fishing area total 270 219 239 181 134 110 99 88 90 110 31 USA 59 38 71 45 41 128 117 133 99 102 31 Fishing area total 59 38 71 45 41 128 117 133 99 102 34 Greece - - - - - - - 71 45 - Portugal 15 46 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes-Of-The-Salish-Sea-Pp18.Pdf
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 18 Fishes of the Salish Sea: a compilation and distributional analysis Theodore W. Pietsch James W. Orr September 2015 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce Papers NMFS National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientifi c Editor Administrator Richard Langton National Marine Fisheries Service National Marine Northeast Fisheries Science Center Fisheries Service Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Offi ce of Science and Technology Fisheries Research and Monitoring Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientifi c Publications Offi ce 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service - The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is published by the Scientifi c Publications Offi ce, National Marine Fisheries Service, The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, fl ora and fauna studies, and data- Seattle, WA 98115. intensive reports on investigations in fi shery science, engineering, and economics. The Secretary of Commerce has Copies of the NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series are available free in limited determined that the publication of numbers to government agencies, both federal and state. They are also available in this series is necessary in the transac- exchange for other scientifi c and technical publications in the marine sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Impacts of Hypothetical Oil Spill Accidents Off
    ESTIMATED IMPACTS OF HYPOTHETICAL OIL SPILL ACCIDENTS OFF PORT MOLLER, PORT HEIDEN AND CAPE NEWENHAM ON EASTERN BERING SEA YELLOWFIN SOLE by Francis M. Fukuhara INTRODUCTION The yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera) is a flounder of the family Pleuronectidae and is the most abundant of the commercially important species of the eastern Bering Sea benthos. The species ranked first or second in abundance of all fish taken in the trawl surveys of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center (NWAFC) trawl surveys in 1975-80. Although information for more recent years was not available, their abundance ranking probably remains unchanged. This large biomass is ubiquitously distributed over the eastern Bering Sea, therefore, any oil spill scenario in Bristol Bay will contaminate some of the species’ habitat. The impact of such contamination on the productivity of the eastern Bering Sea yellowfin sole stock will depend upon the concentrations and duration of exposure as well as the physiological state and life history stage of the animals in the contaminated area. Considerable knowledge has been compiled on the life history, distribution, abundance and fishery of yellowfin sole in the eastern Bering Sea (Fadeev 1970a & b, Bakkala 1981, Wakabayashi 1985). The purpose of this report is to summarize information from these and other sources to provide relevant background information for estimating the impact of specific quantities and types of 2 petroleum released at three sites in Bristol Bay on the productivity of the eastern Bering Sea yellowfin sole population. DISTRIBUTION Overall Distribution Yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera) are widely distributed in the northern North Pacific Ocean and adjacent seas.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the U.S. Pacific Sanddab Resource in 2013
    Status of the U.S. Pacific Sanddab Resource in 2013 by Xi He1, Donald E. Pearson1, John C. Field1, Lyndsey Lefebvre1 and Meisha Key2 August 2013 1Fisheries Ecology Division Southwest Fisheries Science Center U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service 110 Shaffer Road Santa Cruz, CA 95060 [email protected] 2Meisha Key California Department of Fish and Wildlife c/o1 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 4 Stock........................................................................................................................... 4 Catches ...................................................................................................................... 4 Data and assessment ................................................................................................ 5 Stock biomass ........................................................................................................... 6 Recruitment ................................................................................................................ 7 Exploitation status ................................................................................................... 10 Ecosystem considerations ..................................................................................... 12 Management performance ...................................................................................... 12 Unresolved problems
    [Show full text]