I. the Living Theological Heritage of the United Church of Christ: Ancient and Medieval Legacies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I. the Living Theological Heritage of the United Church of Christ: Ancient and Medieval Legacies I. The Living Theological Heritage of the United Church of Christ: Ancient and Medieval Legacies Reinhard Ulrich, editor Part I. Consolidating the Christian Witness (United), 7 Prophets and Apostles 1.1.1 The Didache, (c. 100), 25 1.1.2 Clement's First Letter, (c - 95), CLEMENT, 25 1.1.3 The Faith in Scripture and Tradition from Against Heresies, (c. 189), IRENAEUS, 32 1.1.4 The Rule of Faith and the Uses of Scripture from Prescription, (c. 189), TERTULLIAN, 41 1.1 5 On the Right Way of Reading the Scriptures from On First Principles IV,(c. 230), ORIGEN, 48 1.1.6 New Testament Canon from 39th Easter Letter, (367), ATHANASIUS), 55 Persecution 1.1.7 Letter from the Churches of Lyon and Vienne (177) from The History of the Church, (4th century), EUSEBIUS, 58 1.1.8 The Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicitas, (203), 69 1.1.9 The Problem of the Lapsed from Letter 33, (c. 250), CYPRIAN, 81 Defenders of the Faith 1.1.10 Letter to Diognetus, (c. 150), 84 1.1.11 First Apology, (c. 155), JUSTIN MARTYR, 94 1.1.12 Plea Regarding the Christians, (c. 177), ATHENAGORAS, 109 Visions of Church Unity 1.1.13 Letter to the Philadelphians, (c. 113), IGNATIUS OF ANTIOCH, 123 1.1.14 Outside the Church, There Is No Salvation from Letter 73, (c. 256), CYPRIAN, 129 1.1.15 The Church as the Body of Christ from Commentary on John XI, 1I (On John 17:20-21), CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA, (c. 430), 135 1.1.16 The Church as the Company of the Elect from On Baptism V, (c. 400), AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO, 140 Part II. Giving Account of the Faith (Christ), 145 Antioch and Alexandria 1.2.17 On the Incarnation VII and Commentary on Galatians 4:24 (c. 420) THEODORE OF MOPSUESTIA, 157 1.2.18 Dialogue of Origen with Heraclides and the Bishops with Him Concerning the Father and the Son and the Soul, (c. 235), ORIGEN, 166 1.2.19 On Sin and Salvation from Catechetical Oration 5-8, (late 4th century), GREGORY OF NYSSA, 175 Augustinian Theology 1.2.20 Faith and the Creed, (393), AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO, 184 1.2.21 Sermon on I John 4:12-16 from Eighth Homily (415) AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO, 201 1.2.22 Sermon on Holy Communion from Sermon 272 AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO, 210 1.2.23 On Nature and Grace. (415). AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO, 213 Early Creedal Controversies 1.2.24 The Confession of the Presbyters at Smyrna. (c180). PRESBYTERS AT SMYRNA. 226 1.2.25 The Rule of Faith from Against Praxeas. (213). TERTULLIAN. 228 1.2.26 The Letter of Eusebius of Caesarea Describing the Council of Nicaea. (325). EUSEBIUS. 230 1.2.27 Constantinople: Creed of the 150 Fathers. (381). 235 1.2.28 The Nicene Creed (325) from the UCC Book of Worship, (1996). 237 1.2.29 The Definition of the Council of Chalcedon. (451). 240 1.2.30 The Athanasian Creed: A Western Creed of the Fifth Century. 242 1.2.31 The Apostles' Creed of the Seventh Century. 243 Worship and Work 1.2.32 O Gladsome Light. (early 3rd century). 249 1.2.33 The Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus. (c. 200). 250 1.2.34 Six Hymns of the Early Church. CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA, CYPRIAN OF CARTHAGE, AMBROSE OF MILAN, AMBROSE OF MILAN OR BISHOP NICETA OF REMESIANA, AURELIUS CLEMENS PRUDENTIUS, AND ST. PATRICK. 255 1.2.35 A Sermon on Faith and Works from Homilies on Ephesians 1:1-2 (on Eph. 1:4-5), (4th century), JOHN CHRYSOSTOM, 264 1.2.36 On Female Dress, (c. 200), TERTULLIAN, 268 1.2.37 On Human Sexuality and Christian Marriage from Miscellanies, Book III, (c. 200), CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA, 274 1.2.38 On Public and Military Service from Against Celsus VIII, 73-75, (c. 248), ORIGEN, 279 Eastern Orthodoxy 1.2.39 Communion as Participation from Homilies on I Corinthians 24:1-2 (on I Cor. 10: 16-17), (4th century), JOHN CHRYSOSTOM, 282 1.2.40 Symbols and Images, (726-30), JOHN OF DAMASCUS, 286 1.2.41 The Image Controversy from the Synod of Constantinople, (753), and the Council of Nicaea, (787), 293 Part III Being God's People in the World (Church), 297 The Rise of the Papacy 1.3.42 The Edict of Milan from The History of the Church, (c. 313), EUSEBIUS, 304 1.3.43 Christmas Sermon on the Two Natures of Christ from Sermon 28, the Tome, (448,) POPE LEO I, 308 1.3.44 Dedicatory Letter to His Commentary on Job, (587), POPE GREGORY I, 314 1.3.45 Letter to Childebert, King of the Franks, (late 6th century), POPE GREGORY I, 324 1.3.46 Popes and Emperors: The Struggle Over Investiture, (1076-1122), 327 1.3.47 The Fourth Lateran Council, Canon 1, (121),5 INNOCENT III, 333 1.3.48 Unam Sanctam, (1302), BONIFACE VIII, 337 Mission to the Barbarians 1.3.49 Mission Work in England, (c. 590-604), POPE GREGORY I, 340 1.3.50 The Decrees of the Council of Hertford, (673), 344 1.3.51 The Council of the Germans: The Decrees of the Frankish Synods,(742-43), 347 1.3.52 Letter to Cuthbert, Archbishop of Canterbury on the German Synods and Other Matters of Church Discipline, (747), BONIFACE, 352 1.3.53. Supported by Spiritual Women, (c. 725-50), BONIFACE, LUL, AND LIOBA, 362 Definitions of Christendom 1.3.54 The Lord's Body and Blood, (c. 832), RADBERTUS, 367 1.3.55 Christ's Body and Blood, (c. 833), RATRAMNUS, 369 1.3.56 Why Did God Become Human? from Cur Deus Homo?, (1097-99), ANSELM OF CANTERBURY, 376 1.3.57 Five Ways to Prove the Existence of God from the Summa Theologica, (1266-73), THOMAS AQUINAS, 380 1.3.58 Whether the Trinity of the Divine Persons Can Be Known by Natural Reason? from the Summa Theologica, (1266-73), THOMAS AQUINAS, 390 1.3.59 Natural and Theological Virtues from the Summa Theologica, (1266-73), THOMAS AQUINAS, 395 1.3.60 Whether the Substance of Bread and Wine Remain in the Sacrament after Consecration? from the Summa Theologica, (1266- 73), THOMAS AQUINAS, 405 Part IV. Keeping and Renewing the Faith (Church), 411 Moral and Spiritual Renewal 1.4.61 The Twelve Degrees of Humility from the Rule of St. Benedict, (early 6th century), BENEDICT, 417 1.4.62 The Four Degrees of Love from On the Love of God, (early 12th century, BERNARD OF CLAIRVAUX 423 1.4.63 Exposition of the Lord's Prayer and Pray and Work from the Rule of St. Francis, (1209-23), FRANCIS OF ASSISI, 429 1.4.64 On Spiritual and Mystical Ecstasy from The Soul's Journey into God, (c1259), BONAVENTURE, 434 1.4.65 The Divine Spark in the Soul from Sermon 48 and Blessed Are the Poor! from Sermon 28, (early 14th century), MEISTER ECKHART, 442 1.4.66 The Flowing Light of the Godhead, (1250-65), MECHTHILD OF MAGDEBURG, 452 1.4.67 God in Christ, Our True Mother from Showings, (c. 1388), JULIAN OF NORWICH, 457 1.4.68 German Theology, (late 14th century), 474 Reformation Beginnings 1.4.69 Tractate on the Unity of the Church, (1409), JOHN GERSON, 478 1.4.70 On the Eucharist (1:1-15, 17), (1380, JOHN WYCLIFFE, 488 1.4.71 Treatise of Divine Providence, (1378), CATHERINE OF SIENA, 496 1.4.72 The Congregation of the Elect from De Ecclesia, (1413), JOHN HUSS, 500 1.4.73 Reformers Against the Reformers, (1414-18), THE COUNCIL OF CONSTANCE, 510 Praise and Prayer 1.4.74 Two Twelfth-Century Hymns, PETER ABELARD AND BERNARD OF CLAIRVAUX, 522 1.4.75 The Song of the Virtues from the Scivias, (1141-51), HILDEGARD OF BINGEN, 525 1.4.76 The Canticle of the Sun, (1225), FRANCIS OF ASSISI, 536 1.4.77 Canon of the Mass or The Great Eucharistic Prayer, 539 Sources 549 Index 553 Scriptural Index 574 II. The Living Theological Heritage of the United Church of Christ: Reformation Roots John Payne, editor Part I. Late Medieval and Renaissance Piety and Theology 2.1.1 The Book of the Craft of Dying, (c. mid-15th century), 37 2.1.2 The Imitation of Christ, (c. 1427), THOMAS A KEMPIS, 51 2.1.3 Eternal Predestination and Its Execution in Time, (1517), JOHN VON STAUPITZ, 69 2.1.4 Paraclesis, (1516), DESIDERIUS ERASMUS, 86 Part II. Reformation in Germany, Switzerland, and the Netherlands Martin Luther and the German Reformation 2.2.5 The Freedom of a Christian, (1520), MARTIN LUTHER, 98 2.2.6 Formula of Mass and Communion for the Church at Wittenberg, (1523), MARTIN LUTHER, 121 2.2.7 Hymn: Out of the Depths I Cry to Thee, (1523), MARTIN LUTHER, 137 2.2.8 Small Catechism, (1529), MARTIN LUTHER, 140 2.2.9 The Augsburg Confession, (1530), 160 Zwingli and the Swiss Reformation 2.2.10 Sixty-Seven Articles, (1523), ULRICH ZWINGLI, 196 2.2.11 Action or Use of the Lord's Supper, (1525), ULRICH ZWINGLI, 205 2.2.12 The Schleitheim Confession of Faith, (1527), 214 2.2.13 The Marburg Colloquy, (1529), 224 2.2.14 Sermon One, Decade One: Of the Word of God from Decades, (1549-51), HEINRICH BULLINGER, 248 Calvin and the Genevan Reformation 2.2.15 The Law from Institution of the Christian Religion, (1536), JOHN CALVIN, 266 2.2.16 The Geneva Confession, (1536), WILLIAM FAREL AND JOHN CALVIN, 272 2.2.17 The Strasbourg Liturgy, (1539), MARTIN BUCER, 280 2.2.18 The Form of Church Prayers and Hymns with the Manner of Administering the Sacraments and Consecrating Marriage according to the Custom of the Ancient Church, (Geneva, 1542; Strasbourg, 1545), JOHN CALVIN, 295 2.2.19 Hymn: For Us Our God Is Firm Support (Psalm 46), (1539), JOHN CALVIN, 308 2.2.20 Draft Ecclesiastical Ordinances, (1541), JOHN CALVIN, 312 The German Reformed Church and the Heidelberg Catechism 2.2.21 The Heidelberg Catechism, (1563), 327 2.2.22.
Recommended publications
  • THE EUCHARIST in EARLY MEDIEVAL EUROPE Celia
    THE EUCHARIST IN EARLY MEDIEVAL EUROPE Celia Chazelle In 843 or 844, Pascasius Radbertus, a monk of the Carolingian royal monastery of Corbie and its abbot from 843 to c. 847, presented King Charles the Bald (d. 877) with a special gift: a treatise about the Eucha- rist that Pascasius had written for Corbie’s mission house of Corvey between 831 and 833.1 Located in the eastern Carolingian territory of Saxony, Corvey had been founded from Corbie in 822 to help cement Christianity, and with it Carolingian rule, among the Saxons whom Charlemagne (d. 814) had forcibly converted from paganism around the turn of the ninth century. Pascasius must have recognized the significance of his gift’s timing, made either at Christmas (843) or at Easter (844).2 One of the key precepts expounded in this work, the first Latin treatise specifically on the Eucharist, is that through the Mass, bread and wine are inwardly, mystically changed into the historical flesh and blood of Christ. The sacrament that the king received in the feast honoring the incarnation (Christmas) or resurrection (Easter) was holy food and drink, the source of eternal salvation, because it contained the very body born of Mary in Bethlehem and crucified in Jerusalem. Pascasius wrote De corpore et sanguine Domini (“On the Lord’s Body and Blood”) in the midst of the rebellion of the three older sons of Emperor Louis the Pious (d. 840). By 843, the civil strife this unleashed had torn the Carolingian Empire apart;3 when Louis’ youngest son, 1 I am very grateful to numerous friends and colleagues for generously sharing their knowledge and offering advice on earlier drafts of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Conformist Ecclesiologies Routledge Companion to the Christian Church, Edited by Lewis Mudge and Gerard Mannion, London: Routledge Press, 2009
    Non-Conformist Ecclesiologies Routledge Companion to the Christian Church, edited by Lewis Mudge and Gerard Mannion, London: Routledge Press, 2009. Dr. Michael H. Montgomery Chicago Theological Seminary “Non-conformist churches” may be described as Christian social movements that have adopted a model of church life which is at variance with the practices, governance and self- image of a (usually self-claimed) “normative” church. That is usually a congregationally based model in which the congregation (and not a bishop, council or clergy) is viewed as the sine quo non of ecclesial existence. This serves to contain, defend and nurture religious movements that: 1. are centered upon particular beliefs and practices (e.g. Unitarians and Fundamentalists), 2. have doctrinal beliefs which privilege the position of laity (e.g., Quakers, Congregationalists and Baptists) and 3. emphasize religious experiences of the believer (Charismatic or Pentecostal Christians). “Non-conformist ecclesiologies” are the theological reflections, groundings and identities of those communities and their practices. They are the reflections upon ecclesial experiences, and as such are the “third act” to the (first act) of the experience of Christians in community and the “second act” of guiding theological meta-theories which for them emerged most strongly in the Protestant Reformation: the priesthood of all believers, the importance of a direct relationship with God (rather than the church serving as an intermediary), God’s covenant of grace, Jesus’ call for discipleship, some (highly varying) degree of Biblical Restorationism (practicing church the way it is perceived to be done in the New Testament), the experience and practice of human liberation and the experience of the Holy Spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period
    Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period This volume is an investigation of how Augustine was received in the Carolingian period, and the elements of his thought which had an impact on Carolingian ideas of ‘state’, rulership and ethics. It focuses on Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims, authors and political advisers to Charlemagne and to Charles the Bald, respectively. It examines how they used Augustinian political thought and ethics, as manifested in the De civitate Dei, to give more weight to their advice. A comparative approach sheds light on the differences between Charlemagne’s reign and that of his grandson. It scrutinizes Alcuin’s and Hincmar’s discussions of empire, rulership and the moral conduct of political agents during which both drew on the De civitate Dei, although each came away with a different understanding. By means of a philological–historical approach, the book offers a deeper reading and treats the Latin texts as political discourses defined by content and language. Sophia Moesch is currently an SNSF-funded postdoctoral fellow at the University of Oxford, working on a project entitled ‘Developing Principles of Good Govern- ance: Latin and Greek Political Advice during the Carolingian and Macedonian Reforms’. She completed her PhD in History at King’s College London. Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period Political Discourse in Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims Sophia Moesch First published 2020 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Christi C: the Eucharist How and Why Fr. Frank Schuster Every
    Corpus Christi C: The Eucharist How and Why Fr. Frank Schuster Every so often, on feast days such as Corpus Christi, it is helpful to articulate what the Church means by holding that Jesus Christ our Lord is present in the Eucharist; body, blood, soul, and divinity. That we hold that Jesus is truly present in the Eucharist should come to no surprise because of the number of instances in the New Testament that Jesus says this is so. The last supper as remembered by Mathew, Mark, Luke and First Corinthians quote Jesus when referring to the bread and wine as his body and his blood. Jesus, in John chapter 6, in his bread of life discourse, gives very explicit language regarding how to understand the Eucharist, commanding us to eat his flesh and drink his blood. There are early church writings after the texts in the Bible, such as the Didiche and the Apologies of St. Justin Martyr that speak to the Early Church’s belief in the real presence of Christ. In fact, there are records of tabernacles being established early on for the purpose of reverently housing the Eucharist after Mass for the purpose of bringing the sacrament to the infirm. The belief in the real presence of Christ was simply an accepted tenant of faith for a number of centuries until a controversy erupted in the 9th century. Holy Roman Emperor Charles the Bald had an inquisitive mind and was curious as to whether or not the Eucharist we consume at Mass was also the historical body of the Lord born of the Virgin.
    [Show full text]
  • SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY and ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITY Dmusjankiewicz Fulton College Tailevu, Fiji
    Andn1y.r Uniwr~itySeminary Stndics, Vol. 42, No. 2,361-382. Copyright 8 2004 Andrews University Press. SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY AND ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITY DmusJANKIEWICZ Fulton College Tailevu, Fiji Sacramental theology developed as a corollary to Christian soteriology. While Christianity promises salvation to all who accept it, different theories have developed as to how salvation is obtained or transmitted. Understandmg the problem of the sacraments as the means of salvation, therefore, is a crucial soteriological issue of considerable relevance to contemporary Christians. Furthermore, sacramental theology exerts considerable influence upon ecclesiology, particularb ecclesiasticalauthority. The purpose of this paper is to present the historical development of sacramental theology, lea- to the contemporary understanding of the sacraments within various Christian confessions; and to discuss the relationship between the sacraments and ecclesiastical authority, with special reference to the Roman Catholic Church and the churches of the Reformation. The Development of Rom Catholic Sacramental Tbeohgy The Early Church The orign of modem Roman Catholic sacramental theology developed in the earliest history of the Christian church. While the NT does not utilize the term "~acrament,~'some scholars speculate that the postapostolic church felt it necessary to bring Christianity into line with other rebons of the he,which utilized various "mysterious rites." The Greek equivalent for the term "sacrament," mu~tmbn,reinforces this view. In addition to the Lord's Supper and baptism, which had always carried special importance, the early church recognized many rites as 'holy ordinances."' It was not until the Middle Ages that the number of sacraments was officially defked.2 The term "sacrament," a translation of the Latin sacramenturn ("oath," 'G.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus in Galilee- NT220 Popularity & Misunderstanding LESSON 3 of 3 Can We Trust the New Testament Books?
    Jesus In Galilee- NT220 Popularity & Misunderstanding LESSON 3 of 3 Can We Trust the New Testament Books? Craig L. Blomberg, Ph.D. Distinguished Professor of New Testament Studies at Denver Seminary in Littleton, Colorado I. In this lesson, we will discuss the development of the New Testament text with regard to the sources of the text and its canonicity. We will also begin to examine the New Testament settings in terms of the geography of the New Testament world, Palestine, and Jerusalem. II. Development of the New Testament Text The New Testament was originally written, as it is well known, in Greek. The Greek of the New Testament is Koine (common dialect), the stage in the development of the language from the classical Attic to the modern idiom. It prevailed from c. 300 B.C. to the sixth century A.D. Koine was the form of the language used, when Greece had attained its greatest territorial expansion, as the lingua franca of the Mediterranean world. The Greek, in general, used by Gentiles in the Koine period was the same as that in which the New Testament was written. Manuscript evidence for the text of the New Testament is vastly more abundant than for any other ancient document. The oldest known manuscripts of the works of some of the Greek classical authors are copies made 1,000 years or more after the author’s death. The number of manuscripts of the ancient classics is also limited: about 50 manuscripts of the works of Aeschylus (389-314 B.C.), 100 of Sophocles (496?-406 B.C.), and only one each of the Greek Anthology and the Annals of Tacitus (Roman historian, 55?-117?).
    [Show full text]
  • The Well-Trained Theologian
    THE WELL-TRAINED THEOLOGIAN essential texts for retrieving classical Christian theology part 1, patristic and medieval Matthew Barrett Credo 2020 Over the last several decades, evangelicalism’s lack of roots has become conspicuous. Many years ago, I experienced this firsthand as a university student and eventually as a seminary student. Books from the past were segregated to classes in church history, while classes on hermeneutics and biblical exegesis carried on as if no one had exegeted scripture prior to the Enlightenment. Sometimes systematics suffered from the same literary amnesia. When I first entered the PhD system, eager to continue my theological quest, I was given a long list of books to read just like every other student. Looking back, I now see what I could not see at the time: out of eight pages of bibliography, you could count on one hand the books that predated the modern era. I have taught at Christian colleges and seminaries on both sides of the Atlantic for a decade now and I can say, in all honesty, not much has changed. As students begin courses and prepare for seminars, as pastors are trained for the pulpit, they are not required to engage the wisdom of the ancient past firsthand or what many have labelled classical Christianity. Such chronological snobbery, as C. S. Lewis called it, is pervasive. The consequences of such a lopsided diet are now starting to unveil themselves. Recent controversy over the Trinity, for example, has manifested our ignorance of doctrines like eternal generation, a doctrine not only basic to biblical interpretation and Christian orthodoxy for almost two centuries, but a doctrine fundamental to the church’s Christian identity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Living Theological Heritage of the United Church of Christ
    THE LIVING THEOLOGICAL HERITAGE OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST Barbara Brown Zikmund Series Editor VOLUME SIX Growing Toward Unity Edited by Elsabeth Slaughter Hilke, with a Postscript by Thomas E. Dipko The Pilgrim Press Cleveland, Ohio Contents The Living Theological Heritage of the United Church of Christ xiii Growing Toward Unity 1 Part I. The Ecumenical Journey of the Congregational Churches 9 From Protecting Autonomy to Seeking Church Union 1. An Ecumenical Vision: “The Burial Hill Declaration” (1865) 21 2. Bound Together in Unity: “The Oberlin Declaration on the Unity of the Church” (1871) 25 Early Efforts to Create a United Church 3. Applied Christianity: “A Proposal for Church Union” (1904) 28 Washington Gladden 4. Clarifying Convictions: “Act of Union” and “Explanatory Statement” (1907 and 1910) 35 William Hayes Ward et al. Coping with the Historic Episcopate 5. A Global Issue: “The Lambeth Quadrilateral” (1888) 43 6. The New Jersey Platform: “The Platform of Union” (1896) 46 William Hayes Ward et al. 7. Pessimism Overwhelmed by Hope: “The Barrier to Union,” “For a Conference of All Bodies,” and “The Congregational Attitude” (1910) 48 8. Local Unity: “The Lenox Proposal” (1915) 54 9. Congregational Convictions: “A Statement of the Views... on the Church, the Eucharist, and the Ministry” (1921) 58 Newman Smyth and Williston Walker 10. The Useless Concordat: “Additional Statement” and “The Springfield Declaration on Unity” (1923) 68 Commission on Comity, Federation and Unity; William E. Barton vi • CONTENTS The Global Ecumenical Influence 11. India: “Real Union in South India” (1908) 73 J. P. Jones 12. Edinburgh World Mission Conference: “The Communion of Saints” (1910) 81 The Congregationalist and Christian World 13.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RELATIONSHIP of THEOLOGY and PRAXIS the Issue of Transubstantiation in the Middle Ages
    QL 95 (2014) 183-193 doi: 10.2143/QL.95.3.3075943 © 2014, all rights reserved THE RELATIONSHIP OF THEOLOGY AND PRAXIS The Issue of Transubstantiation in the Middle Ages “How can bread be His body? And the cup, or what the cup contains, how can it be his blood? And the reason these things, brothers and sisters, can be called sacraments is that in them one thing is seen and another is to be understood.”1 While Augustine wrote these words in the early fifth century, they were cited by Ratramnus in 843 in his theological response to Emperor Charles the Bald who had posed two distinct questions to the Benedictine monk: do the faithful receive the body and blood of Christ ‘in a mystery’ or ‘in very truth’, and is this the same body and blood to which Mary gave birth?2 While not intended as such, it is these two pointed questions that prompted the theological development and evolution of the Eucharistic doctrine, resulting in The Council of Trent’s decree on the sacrificial and sacramental nature of the Eucharist some seven centuries later. The Council stated once and for all that Christ is “really, truly, substantially contained”3 in the consecrated forms. And indeed it is the distinction between seeing and understanding which not only led to theological conflict and controversy throughout the Middle Ages, but influenced the foundation of arguably the most important doctrine in the history of the Christian Church: the doctrine of transubstantiation,4 or transsubstantiatio. 1. Augustine, “Sermon 272,” The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century, tr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Daily Eucharist at the Council As Stimulus and Test Case for Liturgical Reform
    QL 95 (2014) 28-51 doi: 10.2143/QL.95.1.3030644 © 2014, all rights reserved THE DAILY EUCHARIST AT THE COUNCIL AS STIMULUS AND TEST CASE FOR LITURGICAL REFORM In order to study the contribution of Vatican II to liturgical reform, most scholars spontaneously will turn to the redaction history of Sacrosanctum Concilium. In this paper I am more interested in the question of how the daily Eucharist celebrated at the beginning of each of the General Congregations was experienced by those present. Were these celebrations experienced as an illustration of the reforms proposed in the Constitution on the Liturgy, or rather as a counter-witness to the sorely needed liturgical reform? My major sources are council diaries, at least those that are attentive to this aspect of the Council’s life. I especially rely on accounts of their liturgical experiences offered by two Latin rite Catholic “observers” of the Council liturgies, the French Dominican, Yves Congar and the Irish journalist and Redemptorist, Xavier Rynne; one Oriental rite Catholic Council father, the Melkite archbishop, Neophytos Edelby; and two “real” observers: the United Church of Christ representative, Douglas Horton and the Presbyterian minister, Robert McAfee Brown. It will soon become clear that two types of Eucharistic celebrations received most attention in their diaries and chronicles: the divine liturgies celebrated in rites other than the Latin one and the opening and concluding ceremonies of each session. Especially in the first session the exposure of the mostly Latin-rite Council Fathers to liturgies celebrated by Byzantine and Oriental Catholic Council Fathers may have cured them of some of their prejudices concerning important issues of liturgical debate such as concelebration, the vernacular and communion under both species.
    [Show full text]
  • New Testament Canon.” the Word “Canon” Is Actually a Greek Word That Means “Rule” Or “Measure.”
    How We Got Our New Testament Greg Stiekes, Pastor, Bethany Bible Church, 2014 Introduction We call the 27 books that comprise our New Testament the “New Testament Canon.” The word “canon” is actually a Greek word that means “rule” or “measure.” For example, the word “canon” is used in Galatians 6:16—“As for all who walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them.” In the overall context of the letter to the Galatians, Paul is saying that there is a standard by which he wanted the church to measure up, and whoever was not walking according to that standard was not living out the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. Notice, then, that a canon is a standard that limits or confines. When applied to the New Testament, the word canon means those original, Greek writings which measure up to or meet the standard of being the Word of God. And the canon limits those writings to 27 “books”—no greater, no fewer; 27 books which are believed to comprise the authoritative writings divinely given by God to the church. Yet a 27-book New Testament canon raises several questions which God’s people should be able to answer, especially when skeptics attack the accuracy and authority of the Bible: 1. How do we know that these and these only 27 Greek documents are the writings God gave to the church? 2. Are the present Greek copies of these books accurate? 3. Do we have confident English translations of the original Greek? 4. Why are other early writings rejected from the canon, even though they claim to be from God or his apostles? Question 1: Why these and these only 27 New Testament Books? The Attack: The New Testament canon was formed by the followers of one version of Christianity which dominated in the first centuries A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading #9 – from Constantine to Augustine
    Reading #9 – From Constantine to Augustine Athanasius – “Easter Letter of 367” Of the particular books and their number, which are accepted by the Church. From the thirty‐ninth Letter of Holy Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, on the Paschal festival; wherein he defines canonically what are the divine books which are accepted by the Church. 1. They have fabricated books which they call books of tables, in which they shew stars, to which they give the names of Saints. And therein of a truth they have inflicted on themselves a double reproach: those who have written such books, because they have perfected themselves in a lying and contemptible science; and as to the ignorant and simple, they have led them astray by evil thoughts concerning the right faith established in all truth and upright in the presence of God. 2. But since we have made mention of heretics as dead, but of ourselves as possessing the Divine Scriptures for salvation; and since I fear lest, as Paul wrote to the Corinthians, some few of the simple should be beguiled from their simplicity and purity, by the subtility of certain men, and should henceforth read other books — those called apocryphal — led astray by the similarity of their names with the true books; I beseech you to bear patiently, if I also write, by way of remembrance, of matters with which you are acquainted, influenced by the need and advantage of the Church. 3. In proceeding to make mention of these things, I shall adopt, to commend my undertaking, the pattern of Luke the Evangelist, saying on my own account:
    [Show full text]