DOCSLIB.ORG

Jaitapur Nuclear Power Plant | Greenpeace India

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jaitapur Nuclear Power Plant | Greenpeace India Press Publications Careers Language: English Greenpeace India search Home About Us What We Do News Get Involved Multimedia Blog Contact Sign in New here? Sign up! DONAT E Hom e What We Do Nuclear Nuclear power in India Jaitapur nuclear power plant Nuclear power in India India's nuclear structure Email Share 0 Map of nuclear f acilities.. Q&A: nuclear power in India Jaitapur nuclear power plant Jaitapur nuclear power plant Environmental impacts Faulty technology The government is planning to build the world’s largest nuclear power plant in Jaitapur, on the west coast of India, in Maharashtra. The site is an ecological and biodiversity ‘hotspot’ that's also known to have Get involved high seismic activity. The plan is an untested, expensive and dangerous gamble with health and land, which is being vehemently opposed. Your full name * What's proposed? Email * Six 1650 MW nuclear reactors, provided by French company AREVA NP. The reactors will be operated by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL), a company owned by the Government of India. With the backing of the government, NPCIL is pushing ahead with its plans despite fierce local resistance to the project. Sign up If built, the total capacity of 9900 MW will make the Jaitapur nuclear reactor ‘park’ the largest in the world. The technology The reactors are European Pressurised Reactors, or EPRs, a design developed by AREVA NP. There are no EPRs operational yet anywhere in the world, and the safety and reliability of the technology is highly questionable. The EPR is based on the same principle as older reactors and, being more powerful, presents even more potential for catastrophe. Three EPR construction sites currently exist in the world, in France, Finland and China. The plants in both France and Finland have repeatedly run over budget, and are running years behind schedule while there is little information on the status of the projects in China. On rocky ground The land for which the Jaitapur nuclear power plant is intended is classified as a seismic zone four, out of a possible five. This has been confirmed by documents obtained under the Right to Information Act of 2005. The website of the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) also places Ratnagiri, the district where Jaitapur is located, as a zone four region. Seismic zone four is known as the ‘High Damage Risk Zone’, under the national system for assessing the likelihood of earthquakes. Further, documents reveal that ninety-two earthquakes have occurred there in just the twenty years between 1985 and 2005. The most severe one Save Mahan, Junglistan, Act Now measured 6.3 on the Richter scale. However, in the Jaitapur Evironmental Impact Assessment of 2010, the NPCIL stated that the site was classified as zone three, which corresponds to a lower risk. The organisation has also recently begun to respond to public pressure on the plant by stating that the Jaitapur site is a mere zone three. Biodiversity Jaitapur is in the Konkan region in the Western Ghats. It is considered to be one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots and is home to thousands of species of plants and animals, many of which are threatened. This project will put this entire ecosystem at considerable risk. Obama and Modi want to sell nuclear Protests power to India that is too... There has been fierce opposition to the project from the people of Jaitapur and the surrounding Blog entry areas. Land has been forcibly acquired in most cases. While there have been attempts to paint the Only two new nuclear plants are being agitations against the plant as being primarily driven by a demand for higher compensation, this is built in the US and even they... Read more far from the truth and objections to the reactor are manifold. The issues at stake for the local > people include concerns about loss of livelihood, serious damage to the environment, issue of safety given the seismic activity of the site, track record of disaster preparedness in India, and finally but importantly, the complete lack of transparency about the project. The government has AERB clueless about industry blacklist made no genuine attempt to address the issues raised and has essentially been trying to gloss Press release over them while stubbornly pressing ahead with the plan. New Delhi/Chennai/Mumbai | December 10, 2014 | Despite evidence of... Read Banks’ pullout more > Early this year, NPCIL expanded the consortium of banks which will invest in Jaitapur from five to fifteen. While the initial list of banks included HSBC, BNP Paribas, Credit Agricole, Sociate Genrale With a decline in global markets, Abbott and Nataxis, later other banks such as Citibank, JP Morgan Chase and Santander were also invited looks to India for uranium sale to invest. Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank - the top two German banks - were also invited to be Press release part of the consortium. While Commerzbank decided not to invest in the project early on, Deutsche New Delhi/Canberra, September 4, 2014: Bank expressed interest in participating in the project. Now it is confirmed that Deutsche Bank has Greenpeace today criticized the... Read decided to cancel its participation. The fact that Jaitapur is located on a seismic zone is of grave more > concern to banks. The events of Fukushima will certainly further intensify those concerns. Is the Govt approval to KNPP 3&4 based The latest updates on lies? Press release All News P ho t o s P ublicat io ns New Delhi, April 8, 2014: According to an RTI response from General... Read more > any category Obama and Modi want to sell nuclear power Fukushima: A great natural (?) disaster to India that is too dangerous and... Blog entry Blog entry by Hozefa Merchant, Sunanda Mehta & Jim Riccio | January Image.. As the victims of the Fukushima 29, 2015 disaster left their homes... Read more > Only two new nuclear plants are being built in the US and even they are way over budget. The recent “breakthrough” in the nuclear talks between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Barack Obama has raised more... Fukushima: A great natural (?) disaster Blog entry by Sunanda Mehta | April 3, 2014 As the victims of the Fukushima disaster left their homes and their lives, some of them never to return, the Japanese government slowly egged back to its old ways. After having sworn off nuclear and shutting down all the 48 commercial... GIC's response to a RTI application filed by Greenpeace reveals that GIC has not been... Publication | April 1, 2014 at 21:56 GIC's response to a RTI application filed by Greenpeace reveals that GIC has not been approached by NPCIL Giving the street back to whom it belongs Blog entry by Bernardo Camara | June 20, 2013 "The people finally woke up" ... and they won't be going back to sleep. This phrase, heard from the four corners of Brazil this Monday, reflected a infectious sentiment felt everywhere. The hours past midnight saw thousands of... The last tree or the final straw? Blog entry by Kumi Naidoo | June 2, 2013 Our office in Istanbul has been under siege. It is in the heart Taksim, an area in which a brutal police clampdown has been trying to end the peaceful protest over the planned destruction of the small, and historic, Gezi Park by... Coming together to stop nuclear weapons Blog entry by Jen Maman | March 24, 2013 Earlier this month, more then 130 governments, UN agencies and the global Red Cross Movement met in Oslo at the invitation of the Norwegian government, to discuss the humanitarian, environmental and developmental consequences of... Hope from Fukushima Blog entry by Junichi Sato, ED Greenpeace Japan | March 10, 2013 As we mark the second memorial of the March 11, 2011 triple disaster, we see tragedy, but also hope in Japan. While people mourn for the mothers, fathers, siblings, grandparents and children that were lost in the earthquake and... Four things you should know about the Fukushima nuclear disaster Blog entry by Laura Kenyon | March 7, 2013 The Fukushima nuclear disaster that began on March 11, 2011 was a scary time for the whole world. Some early reports even warned about radiation being carried on the wind as far as the west coasts of the USA and Canada, and many... Jaitapur farmers resist monetary offers Blog entry by Ignatius Thekaekara | February 15, 2013 Stay up-to-date on news related to the environment. Farmers in Jaitapur, Maharashtra are standing firm in their resolve to protest against the nuclear power plant. The Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL), the promoter of the... Ending the nuclear weapons age Feature story | February 14, 2013 at 22:00 The exact number of nuclear weapons situated across the world is shrouded in mystery, but whatever the number, North Korea's underground test this week is a grim reminder of the devastation and destruction these weapons could unleash. Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 Next 1 - 10 of 135 results. Tags nuclear, nuclear reactors , jaitapur, areva, ncpil, earthquake, epr, protests What we do Abo ut us Greenpeace o nline Nat io nal and regio nal websit es in Stop climate change Introduction Facebook English Sustainable Victories Twitter Africa Agriculture Frequently Asked YouTube Australia Defend our oceans Questions Flickr Canada Greenpeace around Keep Genetic Work for Greenpeace Google+ the world Engineering in the lab China Eliminate e-waste India Mediterranean New Zealand United Kingdom United States Facts & Figures Founded in 1971. Rainbow Warrior Three ships in the sailing vessel, oceans. active since 1989. Offices in 55 countries. Arctic Millions of supporters Sunrise world-wide.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Long Term Sustainability of Nuclear Power in India - Prospects and Challenges
    Page | 45 5 LONG TERM SUSTAINABILITY OF NUCLEAR POWER IN INDIA - PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES Vipin Shukla, Vivek J. Pandya and C. Ganguly ABSTRACT: Nuclear power is emerging as a viable for at least 12 additional indigenous PHWR 700 carbon – free option for India to meet the ever- reactors. The target is to have ~ 45,000 MWe nuclear increasing demand of base – load electricity at an power by 2030. Since the last six years, India has affordable price, in a safe, secured and sustainable also been importing natural uranium oreconcentrate manner. Since the 1970s, India had been pursuing (UOC) and finished natural UO2 pellets tofuel the a self-reliant indigenous nuclear power program ten PHWR 220 units at Rawathbhata, Kakrapara and linking the fuel cycles of Pressurized Heavy Water Narora. India has also been importing enriched UO2 Reactor (PHWR), Fast Breeder Reactor (FBRs) and fuel for the two BWRs at Tarapur and the two VVERs thorium-based self-sustaining breeder in stage 1, 2 at Kudankulunm. The present paper summarizes the and 3 respectively, for efficient utilization of modest on-going and the expanding nuclear power program low grade (0.03-0.06 % U3O8) uranium reserves but in India highlighting the challenges of availability of vast thorium resources. Natural uranium fueled uranium and plutonium for manufacturing nuclear PHWR is the backbone of the program. India has fuels. achieved industrial maturity in PHWR and the related uranium fuel cycle technology. Presently, 21 reactors are in operation, including 16 units of PHWR 220 MWe, 2 units of PHWR 540 MWe, 2 units of Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) 160 MWe and a (Water KEYWORDS Water Energy Reactor) VVER 1000 MWe.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Reduction and Safety Design Features of New Nuclear Power Plants in India
    XA0201901 Annex 13 Cost reduction and safety design features of new nuclear power plants in India V.K. Sharma Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd, India Abstract. Indian Nuclear Power Programme is designed to exploit limited reserves of uranium and extensive resource of thorium. Pressurised heavy water reactors are found most suitable and form the main stay of the first stage of the programme. Thorium utilisation is achieved in the second & third stages. Today India has total installed capacity of 2720 MWe of PHWRs which are operating with high plant load factors of over 80%. Rich experience of construction and operation of over 150 reactor years is being utilised in effecting cost reduction and safety improvements. Standardisation and reduction in gestation period by preproject activities, advance procurement and work packages of engineer, procure, construct and commission are some of the techniques being adopted for cost reduction in the new projects. But the cost of safety is rising. Design basis event of double ended guillotine rupture of primary pressure boundary needs a relook based on current knowledge of material behaviour. This event appears improbable. Similarly some of the safety related systems like closed loop cooling water operating at low temperature and pressure, and low usage factors may be designed as per standard codes without invoking special nuclear requirements. The paper will address these issues and highlight the possible areas for cost reduction both in operating and safety systems. Modern construction and project management techniques are being employed. Gestation period of 5 years and cost of less than US $1400 per KWe are the present targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy in India's Energy Security Matrix
    Nuclear Energy in India’s Energy Security Matrix: An Appraisal 2 of 55 About the Author Maj Gen AK Chaturvedi, AVSM, VSM was commissioned in Corps of Engineers (Bengal Sappers) during December 1974 and after a distinguished career of 38 years, both within Engineers and the staff, retired in July 2012. He is an alumnus of the College of Military Engineers, Pune; Indian Institute of Technology, Madras; College of Defence Management, Secunderabad; and National Defence College, New Delhi. Post retirement, he is pursuing PhD on ‘India’s Energy Security: 2030’. He is a prolific writer, who has also been quite active in lecture circuit on national security issues. His areas of interests are energy, water and other elements of ‘National Security’. He is based at Lucknow. http://www.vifindia.org © Vivekananda International Foundation Nuclear Energy in India’s Energy Security Matrix: An Appraisal 3 of 55 Abstract Energy is essential for the economic growth of a nation. India, which is in the lower half of the countries as far as the energy consumption per capita is concerned, needs to leap frog from its present position to upper half, commensurate with its growing economic stature, by adopting an approach, where all available sources need to be optimally used in a coordinated manner, to bridge the demand supply gap. A new road map is needed to address the energy security issue in short, medium and long term. Solution should be sustainable, environment friendly and affordable. Nuclear energy, a relatively clean energy, has an advantage that the blueprint for its growth, which was made over half a century earlier, is still valid and though sputtering at times, but is moving steadily as envisaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Risks of Operating Candu 6 Nuclear Power Plants: Gentilly Unit 2 Refurbishment and Its Global Implications
    Risks of Operating Candu 6 Nuclear Power Plants: Gentilly Unit 2 Refurbishment and its Global Implications November 2008 BY GORDON R. THOMPSON Institute for Resource and Security Studies www.greenpeace.ca RISKS OF OPERATING ABSTRACT Operation of any nuclear power plant creates risks. CANDU 6 plants CANDU 6 NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: pose additional risks arising from their use of natural uranium as fuel and Gentilly Unit 2 Refurbishment and its heavy water as moderator. A CANDU 6 reactor could experience a violent Global Implications power excursion, potentially leading to containment failure and a release of radioactive material to the environment. Spent fuel discharged from a CANDU 6 could be diverted and used to produce plutonium for nuclear BY GORDON R. THOMPSON weapons. Those risks are examined here with special attention to Hydro- Institute for Resource and Security Studies Quebec’s plan for refurbishment and continued operation of the Gentilly 2 plant. That action would lead to continued radiological risk in Quebec Prepared under the sponsorship of and could promote sales of CANDU 6 plants in other countries, thereby Greenpeace Canada contributing to an enhanced risk of nuclear-weapon proliferation. Hydro- Quebec’s plan also faces regulatory risks. Safety issues could increase the © Copyright November 2008 cost of refurbishing Gentilly 2, weakening an already marginal economic case for refurbishment. This report proposes an approach for systematic, GREENPEACE CANADA public assessment of the risks associated with Gentilly 2. 33 Cecil St. Toronto, Ontario ABOUT THE INSTITUTE FOR RESOURCE AND SECURITY STUDIES M5T 1N1 The Institute for Resource and Security Studies (IRSS) is an independent, www.greenpeace.ca nonprofit, Massachusetts corporation, founded in 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • “Advanced” Isn't Always Better
    SERIES TITLE OPTIONAL “Advanced” Isn’t Always Better Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors “Advanced” Isn’t Always Better Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors Edwin Lyman March 2021 © 2021 Union of Concerned Scientists All Rights Reserved Edwin Lyman is the director of nuclear power safety in the UCS Climate and Energy Program. The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet’s most pressing problems. Joining with people across the country, we combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future. This report is available online (in PDF format) at www.ucsusa.org/resources/ advanced-isnt-always-better and https:// doi.org/10.47923/2021.14000 Designed by: David Gerratt, Acton, MA www.NonprofitDesign.com Cover photo: Argonne National Laboratory/Creative Commons (Flickr) Printed on recycled paper. ii union of concerned scientists [ contents ] vi Figures, Tables, and Boxes vii Acknowledgments executive summary 2 Key Questions for Assessing NLWR Technologies 2 Non-Light Water Reactor Technologies 4 Evaluation Criteria 5 Assessments of NLWR Types 8 Safely Commercializing NLWRs: Timelines and Costs 9 The Future of the LWR 9 Conclusions of the Assessment 11 Recommendations 12 Endnotes chapter 1 13 Nuclear Power: Present and Future 13 Slower Growth, Cost and Safety Concerns 14 Can Non-Light-Water Reactors
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power: India’S Development Imperative
    VIF TASK FORCE REPORT Nuclear Power: India’s Development Imperative Vivekananda International Foundation Nuclear Power: India’s Development Imperative Vivekananda International Foundation 1 2 Table of Contents Task Force Members 5 Acknowledgements 6 Research Assistance 6 Foreword 7 Introductory Comments 9 List of Abbreviations 11 Executive Summary 15 Chapter 1: Global Context 22 1.1 Share of nuclear power in the energy mix 23 1.2 External costs 24 1.3 Cost of large scale integration of nuclear energy 25 1.4 Climate change and IPCC Report 25 1.5 MIT report on the Future of Nuclear Energy in a Carbon-Constrained World 26 1.6 Risk mitigation strategies 27 Chapter 2: Indian Scenario – Challenges and Opportunities 29 2.1 Tariff 32 2.2 Level playing field 32 2.3 Carbon pricing 33 2.4 Energy import bill 34 2.5 Credit vs. indigenisation 35 2.6 Fleet mode construction 35 2.7 Foreign acquisition 36 2.8 Acquisition of uranium assets overseas 36 2.9 Manpower 36 Chapter 3: Progress So Far 37 3.1 1st stage programme based on PHWRs and LWRs 37 3.2 PHWRs to be set up in fleet mode 38 3.3 Light Water Reactor (LWR) to be set up in cooperation with Russian Federation 38 3.4 2nd & 3rd stage programme 38 3 Chapter 4: International Cooperation, its Potential and Limitation 40 4.1 High temperature reactors 41 Chapter 5: Nuclear Industry Eco System 43 5.1 Efficient supply chain management with no bottlenecks 43 5.2 Capacity expansion of vendor base 44 5.3 To improve quality of vendors 45 5.4 Diversification in supply chain across the geopolitical spectrum 45
    [Show full text]
  • The "Self-Limiting" Future of Nuclear Power
    DECEMBER 9, 2011 | No. 738 THE "SELF-LIMITING" FUTURE OF NUCLEAR POWER There are a very large number of studies all of which reach the similar conclusion: THE "SELF-LIMITING" FUTURE energy efficiency programs and renewable power technologies are better than OF NUCLEAR POWER 1 nuclear power plants. The fact that these studies come from a variety of sources, across the political spectrum, and from different disciplines, suggests that there 1. Why does nuclear power is a consensus among abroad base of independent, non-partisan experts that persist 1 nuclear power plants are a poor choice for producing electricity. So why, then, does nuclear power persist? Is it the superficially attractive narrative associated 2. Market Failure and with nuclear energy that conflates it with national progress and pride, alongside Externalities 3 an immensely powerful and effective lobby, a new generation that has either forgotten or never known why it failed previously, deeply rooted habits that favor 3. Subsidies and the giant power stations, and lazy reporting by a credulous press? Socialization of Risk 4 (738.6203) Benjamin K. Sovacool - In Nuclear power generators cannot be 4. Hubris and Technological a chapter of his new book 'Contesting mass-produced. They take much longer Fantasy 6 the Future of Nuclear Power –A Critical to build, and are therefore exposed to Global Assessment of Atomic Energy' escalating interest rates, inaccurate 4.b. Conclusion 9 Benjamin K. Sovacool argues that three demand forecasts, and unforeseen primary culprits exist: the true costs of labor conflicts. Their centralization End notes 9 nuclear energy are not borne by those requires costly and expansive transmis- benefiting from it, resulting in what sion and distribution systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status
    Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: 8 History and Status Thomas B. Cochran, Harold A. Feiveson, Walt Patterson, Gennadi Pshakin, M.V. Ramana, Mycle Schneider, Tatsujiro Suzuki, Frank von Hippel A research report of the International Panel on Fissile Materials February 2010 Research Report 8 International Panel on Fissile Materials Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status Thomas B. Cochran, Harold A. Feiveson, Walt Patterson, Gennadi Pshakin, M.V. Ramana, Mycle Schneider, Tatsujiro Suzuki, Frank von Hippel www.fissilematerials.org February 2010 © 2010 International Panel on Fissile Materials ISBN 978-0-9819275-6-5 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License. To view a copy of this license, visit www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 Table of Contents About the IPFM i 1 Overview: The Rise and Fall of Plutonium Breeder Reactors Frank von Hippel 1 2 Fast Breeder Reactors in France Mycle Schneider 17 3 India and Fast Breeder Reactors M. V. Ramana 37 4 Japan’s Plutonium Breeder Reactor and its Fuel Cycle Tatsujiro Suzuki 53 5 The USSR-Russia Fast-Neutron Reactor Program Gennadi Pshakin 63 6 Fast Breeder Reactors in the United Kingdom Walt Patterson 73 7 Fast Reactor Development in the United States Thomas B. Cochran, Harold A. Feiveson, and Frank von Hippel 89 Contributors 113 Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status Figures Overview: The Rise and Fall of Plutonium Breeder Reactors Figure 1.1 Plutonium breeding. 3 Figure 1.2 History of the price of uranium. 6 Figure 1.3 Funding in OECD countries. 7 Figure 1.4 Dose rate of separated transuranics.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Baseline Plan for Nuclear Energy Self-Sufficiency
    ANL/NE-09/03 India’s Baseline Plan for Nuclear Energy Self-sufficiency Nuclear Engineering Division Prepared for: National Nuclear Security Administration Office of International Regimes and Agreements National Nuclear Security Administration On the cover India's Nuclear facilities About Argonne National Laboratory Argonne is a U.S. Department of Energy laboratory managed by UChicago Argonne, LLC under contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. The Laboratory’s main facility is outside Chicago, at 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439. For information about Argonne and its pioneering science and technology programs, see www.anl.gov. Availability of This Report This report is available, at no cost, at http://www.osti.gov/bridge. It is also available on paper to the U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, for a processing fee, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone (865) 576-8401 fax (865) 576-5728 [email protected] Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor UChicago Argonne, LLC, nor any of their employees or officers, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Officially the Republic of the Union of Myanmar Or the Unio
    UNIT IV INDIA–BURMA RELATIONS Bilateral relations between Myanmar (officially the Republic of the Union of Myanmar or the Union of Burma) and the Republic of India encompass the political, economic and socio- cultural relations that exist between the two neighboring Asian countries. Political relations have improved considerably since 1993, overcoming tensions related to drug trafficking, the suppression of democracy and the rule of the military junta in Myanmar.[1] Political leaders from both countries meet regularly on a bilateral basis and within the ASEAN Plus Six community. Economic relations are considerable with India representing Myanmar's 4th largest export market and the country's 5th largest import partner. The 1,600 km (990 mi) India–Myanmar border separates the Indian states of Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh in Northeast India from Kachin State, Sagaing Region and Chin State in Myanmar/Burma. In addition to the long land border, [2] India and Myanmar also share a maritime border along India's Andaman Islands. Burmese ambassadors at Calcutta in 1882 India - Myanmar/Burmese relations date to antiquity and cultural exchanges included Buddhism and the Burmese script, which was based on the Indian Grantha script. In particular, Theravada Buddhism has tremendously influenced Burmese society and culture for millennia, with around 90% of Burma's population continuing to follow the religion. Myanmar (formerly Burma) was made a province of British India by British rulers and again separated in 1937. It was in Japanese-occupied Burma that Indian nationalist Subhas Chandra Bose delivered his "Give me blood and I will give you freedom!" slogan, and Prime [3] Minister Narendra Modi highlighted Burma's role in the Indian independence movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Nuclear Energy in India
    AUGUST 2016 The Future of Nuclear Energy in India ANIRUDDH MOHAN The Future of Nuclear Energy in India ANIRUDDH MOHAN ABOUT THE AUTHOR Aniruddh Mohan is a Junior Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, working on issues related to climate change, India's energy policy, and the politics of nuclear power. His work at ORF currently focuses on the evolving architecture of climate governance following the 2015 Paris agreement on climate change, and the intricacies of the implementation of India's climate commitments. He has previously worked at the Institute for Defence Studies & Analyses (IDSA) and Aon UK. © 2016 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from ORF. The Future of Nuclear Energy in India ABSTRACT India's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) outlines its intent to scale up the country's clean-energy capacity. At the same time, India's energy poverty remains a big challenge, and the pursuit of the country's development agenda is contingent on extending energy access to millions of citizens who continue to lack connectivity to the power grid. While successive governments have long touted nuclear power as the solution to India's energy woes, actual performance has merely flattered to deceive. India's waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers' Group and its agreement with the global atomic body, IAEA, have resulted in limited breakthroughs in the last decade. This paper makes projections for the growth of nuclear power in India through to 2050 and examines the factors that will be critical to the country's civil nuclear ambitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Inevitability of Atomic Energy in India's Power Programme
    o INEVITABILITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY IN INDIA'S POWER PROGRAMME by R = Ramanna President, Indian National Science Academy IHEVITABIUTY OF ATOMIC ENERGY IN INDIA'S POWER PROGRAMME R. Ramaana President, Indian National Science Academy 1. INTRODUCTION Atomic energy is going through the third phase of its existence. The first was its discovery and the demonstration of the feasibility of using it to generate electricity«, The second stage was the development of nuclear power technology with due emphasis on the standardization of * nuclear power reactor design, suitable material of construction both on the basis of economics and safety. The third stage is its widespread use, with reference to its economic competitiveness, environmental consequen- ces particularly with respect to other sources of energy and the problems of its utilization till towards the end of foe century and beyond. It is clear that atomic power has come to stay but a dispassionate study of its advantages has yet to be made. I say a dispassionate study because in many countries of the world, there has been much public debate on the hazards of nuclear power, some of which not quite connected with either the"economics or the safety aspects of the technology. I would also like to make it quite clear that though I have been associated with atomic energy matters for nearly thirty years, the case I present here is put forth not as one belonging to the profession,, because any suggestion that I make in this paper with respect to future plane will come into fruition long after I have passed the age of retirement, and I will thus have nothing personal to -2- beneüt by it.
    [Show full text]