DOCSLIB.ORG

12-06-17 Desal Committee Packet[Icon]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
12-06-17 Desal Committee Packet[Icon] OTAY WATER DISTRICT DESALINATION PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETING and SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Boardroom WEDNESDAY December 6, 2017 12:30 P.M. This is a District Committee meeting. This meeting is being posted as a special meeting in order to comply with the Brown Act (Government Code Section §54954.2) in the event that a quorum of the Board is present. Items will be deliberated, however, no formal board actions will be taken at this meeting. The committee makes recommendations to the full board for its consideration and formal action. AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S JU- RISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. INFORMATIONAL UPDATE FOR THE ROSARITO DESALINATION PLANT AND THE OTAY MESA CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS (KENNEDY) 4. ADJOURNMENT BOARD MEMBERS ATTENDING: Mark Robak, Chair Tim Smith All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be delib- erated and may be subject to action by the Board. The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the Dis- trict’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered at the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website. Copies of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District Secretary by contacting her at (619) 670-2280. If you have any disability that would require accommodation in order to enable you to partici- pate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at 670-2280 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Certification of Posting I certify that on December 1, 2017 I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time being at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting of the Board of Directors (Government Code Section §54954.2). Executed at Spring Valley, California on December 1, 2017. /s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary 2 STAFF REPORT TYPE MEETING: Desalination Committee MEETING DATE: December 6, 2017 SUBMITTED BY: Bob Kennedy CIP./G.F. NO: P2451- DIV. NO. ALL Engineering Manager 001101 APPROVED BY: Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering Mark Watton, General Manager SUBJECT: Informational Update for the Rosarito Desalination Plant and the Otay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection System Projects GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION: No recommendation. This is an informational item only. COMMITTEE ACTION: Please see Attachment A. PURPOSE: To update the Otay Water District (District) Desalination Committee (Committee) on the progress of the Rosarito Desalination Plant and the Otay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection System Projects (Project)(see Exhibit A for Project location). ANALYSIS: This item was last presented to the Committee as an update at a meeting held on May 23, 2017. The updates or significant milestones that have been reached since the last update to the Committee include: Project Direction Aguas de Rosarito (AdR), a private consortium, signed a 40-year definitive public-private partnership agreement with the State of Baja California (State) on August 25, 2016 to build a desalination plant and conveyance pipeline (Project) and operate it for 37 years. This would be one of the first water projects delivered under the State’s Asociaciones Público Privadas (APP) law. The companies that make up AdR are NuWater of Singapore, Suez Environment of France, and a Mexican company called N.S.C. Agua (NSCA) that is a subsidiary of Cayman-Islands based Consolidated Water (CWCO). The project is stalled at the State of Baja California legislature after several failed attempts to pass a consent decree authorizing the State government to provide financial backup using the pension funds. This is mainly a political issue that AdR hopes to resolve before the end of the legislative session that is scheduled to end mid-December 2017. If the consent decree is not passed during this legislative year, it might have to wait until 2020, after the 2018 presidential elections in Mexico and the 2019 election for Governor for the State of Baja California. The US administration has made several statements about NAFTA, trade, and border wall that has inflamed the situation and provoked a reaction in the Baja California State legislature stalling the consent decree. Rosarito Desalination Project in the News The end of the drought and desalination projects are subjects in the national, state, and local news as well as in Mexico in the State of Baja California. Projects that provide a new supply of water have been mentioned on both sides of the border including the Rosarito Beach Desalination Project. On May 22, 2017, the Water Desalination Report article entitled, “President Approves SWRO Pipeline Permit” about the Presidential Permit granted to the District. The report also noted the permit might signal that the second phase of the project could be accelerated (see Exhibit B). On June 19, 2017, the San Diego Union Tribune published an article entitled, “Could desalinated water from Mexico flow to San Diego?” on the U.S. State Department approval of a cross- border pipeline that could one day carry desalinated water from Mexico to the District (see Exhibit C). The article quotes Cesar Romero Sauceda, head of Tijuana’s Chamber of Construction Industry, “that water has always been a barrier for Tijuana’s growth.” 2 Another article on June 19, 2017 in WaterWorld entitled, “Mexico – U.S. Cross-Border Desal Project Moves Forward” on the U.S. State Department approval of the cross-border pipeline (see Exhibit D). On June 21, 2017, Breitbart published an article entitled, “California May Import Water from Mexico Desalination Plant” about the Project and the State Department’s approval of the permit for the water line on May 16, 2017 (see Exhibit E). On June 23, 2017 an article in NewsDeeply Water Deeply entitled, “Crucial Permit Moves San Diego Closer to Tapping Mexican Desal” about the Project and the District having been granted a Presidential Permit by the U.S. State Department (see Exhibit F). On September 23, 2017, an article in La Jornada Baja California entitled, “Documentos oficiales confirman Proyecto binacional; Kiko Vega lo niega” about official documents confirming that the Rosarito Desal Project is a Binational project. However, B.C. Governor Kiko Vega denies it (see Exhibit G). On September 29, 2017, an article in Fronterra entitled, “Costaran desaladoras de Ensenada y Rosarito mas de 81 mil millones” about the cost for the desal projects in Ensenada and Rosarito, the shortage of water in the region, and the opposition to the PPP (Public-Private Partnership) law (see Exhibit H). On September 29, 2017, an article in ZetaTijuana entitled, “Aprobarán endeudamiento de "Kiko" por 83 mil mdp” about the potential for approval of the use of the pension funds to back up the financing of the project. However, there is opposition from some legislators (see Exhibit I). On November 27, 2017, the San Diego Union Tribune published an article entitled, “Giant Rosarito Beach desalination project faces scrutiny” about the project facing the “scrutiny at a politically sensitive moment. The touchiest public issue is the question of whether some of that water would be sold to the Otay Water District in San Diego County.” The article notes a no vote by the Baja California’s legislature would delay the desalination plant and put on hold eight other public-private- partnership projects (see Exhibit J). 3 Contract with AECOM AECOM continues to finalize their work on the environmental tasks. Staff expects to terminate its contract with AECOM after compiling all of the reports and documents for the federal record with the State Department. All the pending work is expected to be completed by December 2017. Division of Drinking Water (DDW) Permitting (formerly CDPH) On November 15, 2017, the District notified DDW that after three years of source water testing at the power plant intake and outlet structures, AdR will suspend further routine testing and focus on the financial close of Phase 1 of the two phase Project. The results are posted with DDW. Staff and representatives from AdR continue to coordinate on complying with the California Water Resources Control Board Drinking Water Program regulatory requirements related to source water quality testing. Presidential Permit The Department of State issued a Presidential permit to the Otay Water District (the District) on May 16, 2017, authorizing the District to construct, connect, operate, and maintain cross- border water pipeline facilities for the importation of desalinated seawater at the international boundary between the United States and Mexico in San Diego County, California. In making this determination, the Department provided public notice of the proposed permit, offered the opportunity for comment, and consulted with other federal agencies, as required by Executive Order 11423, as amended. This was published in the Federal Register on June 6, 2017 (see Exhibit K). With this approval it is expected Mexico’s federal agencies may need to issue a similar permit to bring symmetry into the approval of a cross border pipeline with the International Boundary and Water Commission, and their counterpart in Mexico, Comisión Internacional de Límites y Agua (IBWC/CILA) as the agencies to administer the transportation of water across the border and to protect the District from local interference in the delivery of desalinated water. IBWC/CILA currently fill this role for the existing pipeline border crossing south of Alta Road that transport Mexico water from Mexico’s allotment from the Colorado River. 4 FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer No fiscal impact as this is an informational item only.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Purpose and Need for the Project Chapter 1.0 – Purpose and Need for the Project
    CHAPTER 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT CHAPTER 1.0 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT 1.1 INTRODUCTION The General Services Administration (GSA) proposes the reconfiguration and expansion of the existing San Ysidro Land Port of Entry (LPOE). The San Ysidro LPOE is located along Interstate 5 (I-5) at the United States (U.S.)-Mexico border in the San Ysidro community of San Diego, California. The proposed San Ysidro LPOE improvements are herein referred to as the “Project.” The total area of the Project Study Area, which comprises the anticipated maximum extent of disturbance, including improvements, staging areas, and temporary impacts resulting from Project construction, encompasses approximately 50 acres. Figure 1-1 illustrates the regional location of the Project, and Figure 1-2 shows the Project Study Area and the Project vicinity. The Project is included in the San Diego Association of Governments’ (SANDAG) 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP; SANDAG 2007); and the 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP; SANDAG 2008), which covers Fiscal Years (FY) 2009 through 2013. 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED 1.2.1 Purpose of the Project The purpose of the Project is to improve operational efficiency, security, and safety for cross-border travelers and federal agencies at the San Ysidro LPOE. Project goals include: Increase vehicle and pedestrian inspection processing capacities at the San Ysidro LPOE; Reduce northbound vehicle and pedestrian queues and wait times to cross the border; Improve the safety of the San Ysidro LPOE for vehicles and pedestrians crossing the border, and for employees at the LPOE; Modernize facilities to accommodate current and future demands and implementation of border security initiatives, such as the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI), the United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology program (US-VISIT), and the Secure Border Initiative (SBI).
    [Show full text]
  • An Employee-Owned Company
    An Employee-Owned Company February 12, 2018 Mr. Michael Brekka RV Communities LLC 7855 Herschel Avenue, Suite 200 La Jolla, CA 92037 Reference: Cultural Resources Survey for the Alvarado Creek Specific Plan, La Mesa, California (RECON Number 4167-2) Dear Mr. Brekka: This letter describes the results of a cultural resources survey conducted for the Alvarado Creek Specific Plan by RECON Environmental, Inc. (RECON). The project site is located in the urbanized floodplain of Alvarado Creek in the City of La Mesa (Figure 1). The entire project area has been disturbed by urbanization to varying degrees. No previously recorded prehistoric or historic archaeological resources are within or immediately adjacent to the project. The San Diego RV Resort was constructed sometime between 1953 and 1964 as a mobile home park and is over 50 years old. As such, it is potentially eligible for inclusion on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) and National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). 1.0 Introduction The project is located on the south side of Interstate 8, approximately 1,500 feet east of 70th Street/Lake Murray Boulevard and approximately 1,000 feet west of the Interstate 8/Fletcher Parkway intersection. Alvarado Creek runs immediately on the southern boundary of the western portion of the project, then turns north, dividing the project area into two pieces. The western portion is approximately twice the size of the eastern portion. The project is in an unsectioned portion of the Mission San Diego land grant, Township 16 South, Range 2 West, on the 7.5-minute U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 San Diego
    BINATIONAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA January 14, 2013 Binational Hazardous Materials Prevention and Emergency Response Plan Among the County Of San Diego, the City of San Diego, California, and the City of Tijuana, Baja California January 14, 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2005-Present ...................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2003 .................................................................................................... 6 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................... 10 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES................................................................................................... 17 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 1.0 TIJUANA/SAN DIEGO BORDER REGION ................................................................. 25 1.1 General Aspects of the Region ........................................................................................ 25 1.1.1 Historical and Cultural Background ................................................................ 25 1.1.2 Geographic Location
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego & Arizona Eastern (SD&AE) Railway Fact Sheet
    April 2013 Metropolitan Transit System San Diego & Arizona Eastern (SD&AE) Railway OWNER San Diego Metropolitan System (MTS) ROUTE DESCRIPTION Four (4) lines totaling 108 miles. Main Line Centre City San Diego south to San Ysidro/International Border at Tijuana. Total length 15.5 miles. This Line extends through Mexico (44.3 miles) and connects up with the Desert Line. The portion through Mexico, originally constructed as part of the Main Line, is now owned by the Mexican national railways, Ferrocarril Sonora Baja California Line. La Mesa Branch Downtown San Diego east to City of El Cajon. Total length: 16.1 miles. Coronado Branch National City south to Imperial Beach. Total length 7.2 miles. Desert Line Extends north and east from International Border (junction called Division) to Plaster City, where it joins the Union Pacific (UP) Line from El Centro. Total length: 69.9 miles. TRANSIT OPERATOR San Diego Trolley, Inc. (SDTI), a wholly subsidiary of MTS on Main Line and on the La Mesa Branch. Frequency Seven (7) days a week; 4:16 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.; 15-minute headways most of the day on Blue and Orange Lines; 7.5 minute peak hour service on Blue Line; 30-minute evenings. Patronage 97,401 average daily riders (FY 12). FREIGHT OPERATOR Private operators, San Diego & Imperial Valley (SD&IV) Railroad on three (3) lines: Main Line, La Mesa Branch, and Coronado Branch, and Pacific Imperial Railroad, Inc (PIR) on the Desert Line. Frequency Provides service as needed and at night when the San Diego Trolley is not in operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B. Harper Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Sula Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Mark Dodero Recon Environmental Inc., San Diego, California Sergio Mata Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Jorge Ochoa Long Beach City College, Long Beach, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Alan B.; Vanderplank, Sula; Dodero, Mark; Mata, Sergio; and Ochoa, Jorge (2011) "Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss1/4 Aliso, 29(1), pp. 25–42 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PLANTS OF THE COLONET REGION, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO, AND A VEGETATION MAPOF COLONET MESA ALAN B. HARPER,1 SULA VANDERPLANK,2 MARK DODERO,3 SERGIO MATA,1 AND JORGE OCHOA4 1Terra Peninsular, A.C., PMB 189003, Suite 88, Coronado, California 92178, USA ([email protected]); 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA; 3Recon Environmental Inc., 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California 92101, USA; 4Long Beach City College, 1305 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California 90806, USA ABSTRACT The Colonet region is located at the southern end of the California Floristic Province, in an area known to have the highest plant diversity in Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • Colegio La Esperanza Gran Kermesse November 2002 The
    You're Invited! Colegio La Esperanza To Present La Gran Kermesse Celebrating the Mexican Revolution GRAN KERMESSE FESTIVAL OF THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION at the COLEGIO LA ESPERANZA Saturday, the 20th of NOVEMBER 2010 from 10 am to 2 pm “Fun for the whole Family” The famous La Esperanza schools invite the San Diego and Tijuana Community to participate in a Gran Kermesse Festival celebrating the Mexican Revolution in the Colonia la Esperanza of the Delegación Sanchez Taboada, La Mesa, Tijuana Saturday, November 20h from 10 am to 2 pm. The event will promote Mexican Culture and raise funds to provide scholarships and funds for construction the first High School in the Tijuana borough where 180,000 people live. There will be activities and entertainment for the whole family including: Authentic, Delicious Mexican Cuisine Traditional Music and Ballet Folklorico of Mexico Games and Competitions Loteria and Raffles Tour of the famous buildings with James Hubbell The Tijuana and San Diego communities are invited to celebrate a great day with music and good food as well as get to know the beautiful architecture and colorful mosaics of the renowned La Esperanza schools designed by Santa Ysabel artist James Hubbell, who will be present Colegio La Esperanza was founded 22 years ago with the mission to foment the development of children through a program of Classical Arts education and the basic program for Kindergartens, elementary schools and High Schools delineated by the Secretary of Education of Baja California. Information about the La Esperanza schools is available on the web at http://www.americasfoundation.net Photos of 2003 Kermesse at http://christine.americasfoundation.net/Colegio_La_Esperanza_2003_Kermesse.html Volunteer Car pool will leave H St.
    [Show full text]
  • Otay Mesa – Mesa De Otay Transportation Binational Corridor
    Otay Mesa – Mesa de Otay Transportation Binational Corridor Early Action Plan Housing September 2006 Economic Development Environment TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Foundation of the Otay Mesa-Mesa de Otay Binational Corridor Strategic Plan..................................1 The Collaboration Process...........................................................................................................................1 The Strategic Planning Process and Early Actions .....................................................................................3 Organization of the Report ........................................................................................................................3 ISSUES FOR EVALUATION AND WORK PROGRAMS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................5 The Binational Study Area ..........................................................................................................................5 Issues Identified ...........................................................................................................................................5 Interactive Polling........................................................................................................................................7 Process.......................................................................................................................................................7 Results .......................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern San Diego County Island Annexation Attachment C
    Southeastern San Diego County Island Annexation Attachment C: General Plan Amendments THE CITY OF SAN DIEGOSAN MARCOS ESCONDIDO GeneralCARLSBAD Plan Conservation Element ENCINITAS 15 SOLANA BEACH POWAY DEL 5 56 MAR SANTEE 52 52 805 15 67 5 125 EL CAJON 163 8 LA MESA Pacific Ocean 8 LEMON GROVE 94 15 5 125 CORONADO 75 San Diego Bay NATIONAL Figure CE-1 CITY 54 Steep Slopes and 200 Ft. Contours CHULA VISTA Topographic Contours (200 Ft. Interval) Steep Slopes (25% or steeper) 5 805 125 IMPERIAL BEACH 905 Miles 02461 THIS MAP IS PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS, MEXICO FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Copyright SanGIS. All Rights Reserved. THE CITY OF SAN DIEGOSAN MARCOS ESCONDIDO GeneralCARLSBAD Plan Conservation Element ENCINITAS 15 SOLANA BEACH POWAY DEL 5 56 MAR SANTEE 52 52 805 15 67 5 125 EL CAJON 163 8 LA MESA Pacific Ocean 8 LEMON GROVE 94 15 5 125 CORONADO 75 San Diego Bay NATIONAL Figure CE-1 CITY Steep Slopes and 200 Ft. Contours CHULA VISTA 125 Steep Slopes (25% or steeper) 5 805 IMPERIAL BEACH 905 Miles 0 1 2 4 6 THIS MAP IS PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, : EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS, MEXICO FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Copyright SanGIS. All Rights Reserved. SAN MARCOS ESCONDIDO CARLSBAD THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO General Plan Conservation Element ENCINITAS 15 SOLANA BEACH POWAY 5 56 DEL MAR SANTEE 52 52 805 15 67 5 125 EL CAJON 163 8 Vicinity Map Marron Valley LA MESA 8 Pacific Ocean 94 LEMON GROVE 15 5 125 M E X I C O CORONADO 75 NATIONAL 54 CITY Figure CE-2 Multi-Habitat Planning Area CHULA VISTA City-Owned Land Non-City Owned Land Other Features 5 805 IMPERIAL 125 Military Lands BEACH 905 THIS MAP IS PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, Miles EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS, 02461 FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session on the Value
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 069 043 EA 004 665 TITLE Year-Round Schools. Hearing Before the General Subcommittee on. Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session on the Value of Year-Round Schools. (Washington, D. CO, April 24, 1972.) INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. House Committee on Education and Labor. PUB DATE 24 Apr 72 NOTE 428p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$16.45 DESCRIPTORS *Costs; *Extended School Year; *Quarter System; School Calendars; *School Districts; School Schedules; Trimester Schedules; *Year Round Schools IDENTIFIERS Congressional Hearings ABSTRACT This document contains statements by experts in the field of year-round schools and excerpts from publications dealing with various plans for year-round schools. The statements and publications discuss (1) the Valley View 45-15 continuous school year plan,(2) the Jefferson County, Kentucky, elective quarter plan, (3) various four quarter school plans,(4) the three plus system,(5) the Dade County Florida *quinmester* program, and (6) other extended school year programs. (JF) YEAR-ROUNDSCHOOLS ' re\ CD HEARING BEFORE THE GENERAL SUBCOMMITTEEON EDUCATION OF TILE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAND LABOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-SECOND CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON THE VALUE OF YEAR-ROUNDSCHOOLS HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON,D.C. APRIL 24, 1972 Printed for the use of the Committeeon Education and Labor CARLD.PERKINS,Chairman U.S. DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH, EDUCATIONd WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG- INATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN- IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU- CATION POSITION OR POLICY.
    [Show full text]
  • Potable Water & Wastewater Master Plan for Tijuana and Playas De
    Section 3 Assessment of Current Conditions 3.1 Water Resources The cities of Tijuana and Playas de Rosarito currently obtain water from two primary water resources: surface water from the Colorado River and ground water coming from several aquifers, such as Tijuana, La Misión and Rosarito (see Figure 2-1). Table 3-1 shows the water production from the main supply sources for the year 2001. Table 3-1 Average Annual Water Production for 2001 Source l/s El Carrizo Reservoir 3,133 Abelardo L. Rodríguez Reservoir 38 Río Tijuana Wells 73 La Misión Wells 51 Rosarito Wells 22 Total 3,317 Source: Subdirección de operación y mantenimiento, Potable Water Department, CESPT 2001. Occasionally, rainwater is stored in both reservoirs to supply Tijuana. However, this is not a reliable source of water due to the unpredictability of rain in the area. This will be discussed later in subsection 3.1.1. 3.1.1 Condition and Capacity To resolve the problem of a lack of surface water from rain and the limited amount that can be extracted from the existing aquifers in the region through deep wells, the State Government, assisted by the Federal Government, has taken the following important actions: The construction of the Abelardo L. Rodríguez Reservoir in 1937. The construction of wells and a conveyance line in 1963 in La Misión, located approximately 37 miles (60 km) south of the City of Tijuana. The construction of the Colorado River-Tijuana Aqueduct in the 1980s. The Colorado River: Main Supply Source The International Water Treaty with the United States of Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 217 11:45:20AM Club Information Report CUS9503 09/01/2021
    Run Date: 09/22/2021 Key Club CUS9503 Run Time: 11:53:54AM Club Information Report Page 1 of 217 Class: KCCLUB Districts from H01 to H99 Admin. Start Date 10/01/2020 to 09/30/2021 Club Name State Club ID Sts Club Advisor Pd Date Mbr Cnt Pd Amount Kiwanis Sponsor Club ID Div H01 - Alabama Abbeville Christian Academy AL H90124 Debbie Barnes 12/05/2020 25 175.00 Abbeville K04677 K0106 Abbeville High School AL H87789 Valerie Roberson 07/06/2021 9 63.00 Abbeville K04677 K0106 Addison High School AL H92277 Mrs Brook Beam 02/10/2021 19 133.00 Cullman K00468 K0102 Alabama Christian Academy AL H89446 I Page Clayton 0 Montgomery K00174 K0108 Alabama School Of Mathematics And S AL H88720 Derek V Barry 11/20/2020 31 217.00 Azalea City, Mobile K10440 K0107 Alexandria High School AL H89049 Teralyn Foster 02/12/2021 29 203.00 Anniston K00277 K0104 American Christian Academy AL H94160 I 0 Andalusia High School AL H80592 I Daniel Bulger 0 Andalusia K03084 K0106 Anniston High School AL H92151 I 0 Ashford High School AL H83507 I LuAnn Whitten 0 Dothan K00306 K0106 Auburn High School AL H81645 Audra Welch 02/01/2021 54 378.00 Auburn K01720 K0105 Austin High School AL H90675 Dawn Wimberley 01/26/2021 36 252.00 Decatur K00230 K0101 B.B. Comer Memorial School AL H89769 Gavin McCartney 02/18/2021 18 126.00 Sylacauga K04178 K0104 Baker High School AL H86128 0 Mobile K00139 K0107 Baldwin County High School AL H80951 Sandra Stacey 11/02/2020 34 238.00 Bayside Academy AL H92084 Rochelle Tripp 11/01/2020 67 469.00 Daphne-Spanish Fort K13360 K0107 Beauregard High School AL H91788 I C Scott Fleming 0 Opelika K00241 K0105 Benjamin Russell High School AL H80742 I Mandi Burr 0 Alexander City K02901 K0104 Bessemer Academy AL H90624 I 0 Bob Jones High School AL H86997 I Shari Windsor 0 Booker T.
    [Show full text]
  • Wastewater Collection Rehabilitation for Main Lines in Tijuana, Mexico
    Wastewater Collection Rehabilitation for Main Lines in Tijuana, Mexico Environmental Assessment February 4, 2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 Border Environment Cooperation Commission Comisión de Cooperación Ecológica Fronteriza Blvd. Tomas Fernández, No. 8069 Cd. Juárez, Chihuahua, México Telephone: (011-52-16) 25-91-60 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ALTERNATIVES .............. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ............................................................................... 18 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administers the Border Environment Infrastructure Fund (BEIF), which provides grant funding for water and wastewater infrastructure projects located along the international boundary between the United States (U.S.) and Mexico. EPA policy for use of border funds requires evaluation and certification of projects by the Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC) as a condition for grant award. As part of the BECC certification process, the proposed project must comply with (1) Mexican environmental regulations and (2) the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The EPA requires compliance with NEPA before BEIF funds can be authorized. Projects within 62 miles (mi) (100 kilometers [km]) of the U.S./Mexico border are eligible for BEIF assistance. In accordance with the U.S. Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations, 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508, and EPA regulations (40 CFR Part 6) as guidance, this Environmental Assessment (EA) documents the environmental consequences in the U.S. of the proposed federal action. The purpose of this document is to comply with NEPA documentation requirements for the proposed federal action under consideration.
    [Show full text]