DOCSLIB.ORG

Lunar ISRU 2019: Developing a New Space Economy Through Lunar Resources and Their Utilization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lunar ISRU 2019: Developing a New Space Economy Through Lunar Resources and Their Utilization Program Lunar ISRU 2019: Developing a New Space Economy Through Lunar Resources and Their Utilization July 15–17, 2019 • Columbia, Maryland Institutional Support Lunar and Planetary Institute Universities Space Research Association NASA Lunar Exploration Analysis Group Co-Conveners Stephen Mackwell American Institute of Physics Clive Neal University of Notre Dame Christopher Pestak Universities Space Research Association Science Organizing Committee Angel Abbud-Madrid Colorado School of Mines Dale Boucher Deltion Innovations Ltd., Canada Ben Bussey NASA Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate Leslie Gertsch Missouri University of Science and Technology John Gruener NASA Johnson Space Center Samuel Lawrence, LEAG Chair NASA Johnson Space Center Alex McDonald NASA Office of the Administrator Gerald Sanders NASA Johnson Space Center Nantel Suzuki NASA Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Abstracts for this meeting are available via the meeting website at www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lunarisru2019/ Abstracts can be cited as Author A. B. and Author C. D. (2019) Title of abstract. In Lunar ISRU 2019: Developing a New Space Economy Through Lunar Resources and Their Utilization, Abstract #XXXX. LPI Contribution No. 2152, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. Guide to Sessions Lunar ISRU 2019: Developing a New Space Economy Through Lunar Resources and Their Utilization July 15–17, 2019 Columbia, Maryland Monday, July 15, 2019 8:30 a.m. USRA Conference Center Introduction and Updates 1:15 p.m. USRA Conference Center Marketing of Resources 5:00 p.m. USRA Education Gallery Poster Session: Characterization 5:00 p.m. USRA Education Gallery Poster Session: Identification of Resources 5:00 p.m. USRA Education Gallery Poster Session: Marketing of Resources Tuesday, July 16, 2019 8:15 a.m. USRA Conference Center Identification of Resources 1:15 p.m. USRA Conference Center Characterization of Resources 5:00 p.m. USRA Education Gallery Poster Session: Extraction of Resources 5:00 p.m. USRA Education Gallery Poster Session: Processing of Resources Wednesday, July 17, 2019 8:15 a.m. USRA Conference Center Extraction of Resources 1:15 p.m. USRA Conference Center Processing of Resources Monday, July 15, 2019 INTRODUCTION AND UPDATES 8:30 a.m. USRA Conference Center Times Authors (*Denotes Presenter) Abstract Title and Summary 8:30 a.m. Neal C. * Introduction and Workshop Logistics 8:40 a.m. TBD * NASA — Going Forward to the Moon 9:00 a.m. Picard M. * Canadian Space Agency 9:20 a.m. Makaya A. * European Space Agency 9:40 a.m. Martin G. * Lamboray B. The Luxembourg Perspective on ISRU and the Development of a Commercial Space Ecosystem 9:55 a.m. Suzuki N. * NASA — ISRU Perspective 10:15 a.m. Acierno K. * iSpace and Lunar Resources 10:30 a.m. Break 10:45 a.m. Moderator: Sowers G. Panel: Commercial Lunar Propellant Architecture Study Panelists: Barnhard G. Kelsey L. Blair B. 12:00 p.m. Lunch Monday, July 15, 2019 MARKETING OF RESOURCES 1:15 p.m. USRA Conference Center Chair: Alex MacDonald Times Authors (*Denotes Presenter) Abstract Title and Summary 1:15 p.m. MacDonald A. * What are ‘Markets’ for Lunar Resources? 1:25 p.m. Christensen C. * Lunar ISRU Markets Within Broader Economic Context 1:40 p.m. Marquez P. * Space Resource Markets and Lessons Learned 1:55 p.m. Jones C. * Exploration Architectures and Lunar ISRU 2:10 p.m. Chen H. Sarton du Jonchay T. Hou L. Integrated Analysis Framework for Space Propellant Logistics: Ho K. * Production, Storage, and Transportation [#5003] Our research proposes an integrated ISRU evaluation framework through the network-based space logistics architecture and analyzes the performance of ISRU by considering plant deployment, regular production operations, and propellant storage. 2:15 p.m. Gelino N. J. * Buckles B. C. Construction of Infrastructure is the Key to Establishing a Mueller R. P. Cislunar Economy [#5072] Government funded infrastructure in Cislunar space and on the lunar surface will be pivotal in establishing a Cislunar economy. Government, industry, and academia must define the highest return on investment areas for government funded infrastructure and develop it. 2:20 p.m. Blair B. R. * Emerging Markets for Lunar Resources [#5046] Recent movements in commercial space investment have inspired quantitative market models for lunar propellant and related commodities on the lunar surface, Earth-Moon Lagrange points, in lunar orbit, and in high-traffic inclinations of Earth orbit. 2:25 p.m. Bienhoff D. G. * Markets for Lunar ISRU Products and Their Value [#5018] Lunar ISRU products and their value as a function of use location for CSDC’s architecture is discussed. A high early value is critical to in situ resource development. Value as a function of launch cost is another hurdle that must be overcome. 2:30 p.m. Discussion: Markets for Lunar Resources 3:00 p.m. Break 3:15 p.m. Meurisse A. * Carpenter J. ISRU: An Approach to Change and Knowledge Gaps to Fill for Viable Processes in Space [#5005] As an interest in ISRU is emerging again, it is important to understand the failure of the past. This work offers a critical look at the past considerations of ISRU activities and proposes a new focus for developing the field in the long- term. 3:20 p.m. Bennett N. J. * An Existing Market for Lunar Propellant — GTO Orbit Raising as a Service [#5043] GTO orbit raising is an existing market for lunar sourced propellant. This market can charge higher prices per kilogram and be serviced by a much smaller mining operation than a LEO market; these factors translate to significantly higher returns. 3:25 p.m. Moderator: MacDonald A. Panel Discussion: What Are the Critical Economic and Market Panelists: Christensen C. Marquez P. Issues We Need to Address for Lunar ISRU? Jones C. 5:00 p.m. Adjourn Monday, July 15, 2019 POSTER SESSION: CHARACTERIZATION OF RESOURCES 5:00 p.m. USRA Education Gallery Authors Abstract Title and Summary Colaprete A. Elphic R. C. Shirley M. Characterizing Lunar Polar Volatiles at the Working Scale: Going from ISRU Goals to Mission Requirements [#5025] This paper presents new geostatistical analysis and modeling to quantify critical parameter scales and mission requirements for adequate characterization of polar volatiles. Vonstad F. K. Ferreira P. Using an Interdisciplinary Sample Testing Framework for Borehole Cores [#5051] The research proposed is to create an interdisciplinary Sample Testing Framework for space utilization, combining Earth sciences with current astrobiology testing. This would be done using the newly developed Sample Testing Framework. Barnhard G. P. Surface-to-Surface Power Beaming [#5093] Space Power Beaming & Ancillary Services (SPB&AS) technology to be used to provide wireless utility services (e.g., power, data, communications, navigation, time, heat, etc.) in the lunar environment in a cost and resource effective manner. Battler M. Faragalli M. Reid E. Cole M. Supporting ISRU Missions Through Mission Raimalwala K. Smal E. Vandermeulen M. Control Software [#5095] Aziz M. Mission Control Space Services Inc. is developing mission control software to address emerging operations and autonomy needs in upcoming privately-led lunar ISRU missions, including improved guidance/navigation/control, communication, and data needs. Wilkes J. M. Greenhouses as the Source of Rare Lunar Resources [#5102] This paper is a discussion of what one would grow in a lunar greenhouse and why. Food and medicine will be mentioned, but the focus is on materials to construct, furnish, operate, and maintain a lunar base which are easiest to import as a seed. Shukla S. Kumar S. Tolpekin V. A. Revisiting the Retention Framework of Lunar Helium-3 Through Space Weathering Processes and Its Implications [#5108] A new space weathering perspective for precisely characterizing lunar Helium-3, wherein higher retentivity of hydrated pyroclasts is observed as part of preliminary survey. Such regoliths provide potential mining sites to develop lunar energy market. Taylor G. J. Blake D. F. Sarrizin P. XTRA: An Extraterrestial Regolith Analyzer for Bristow T. F. Martel L. M. Lucey P. G. Resource Exploration [#5116] Zacny K. Downs R. Chen J. Dera P. A new X-ray diffraction/X-ray fluorescence instrument will aid in Gailhanou M. McKenzie W. Quinn R. resource exploration and process monitoring. Thomson K. Walroth R. Joshi D. R. Eustes A. W. Rostami J. Using Real-Time Drilling Data to Characterize Water-Ice on Dreyer C. Zody Z. Liu W. the Moon [#5127] This paper offers the details of the design of the test drill unit based on heritage drill systems used by NASA and others. The paper discusses the acquisition and analysis of the drilling data to assess the strength and water content in the PSRs. Monday, July 15, 2019 POSTER SESSION: IDENTIFICATION OF RESOURCES 5:00 p.m. USRA Education Gallery Authors Abstract Title and Summary Brown H. M. Robinson M. S. Identifying Resource-Rich Lunar Permanently Shadowed Regions [#5035] Boyd A. K. We compare the lunar polar volatile datasets in order to identify sites that are most likely to host volatiles, and rank PSRs by resource potential. Jozwiak L. M. Patterson G. W. Mini-RF Monostatic Radar Observations of Permanently Shadowed Perkins R. Crater Floors [#5079] We used Mini-RF to analyze the CPR of flat PSR and non-PSR crater floors at the lunar north and south pole. No significant differences in the CPR were observed, suggesting water ice may not be preferentially concentrated in shadowed regions. Barker D. C. Lunar Resources: From Finding to Making Demand [#5083] The current model of spaceflight is insufficient to kick-start off Earth ISRU, mining and usage of lunar resources. A paradigm shift, either by NASA or privately, must be initiated in a sustainable and long-term manner, if actual headway is to occur. Schmitt H.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Back to the the Future? 07> Probing the Kuiper Belt
    SpaceFlight A British Interplanetary Society publication Volume 62 No.7 July 2020 £5.25 SPACE PLANES: back to the the future? 07> Probing the Kuiper Belt 634089 The man behind the ISS 770038 Remembering Dr Fred Singer 9 CONTENTS Features 16 Multiple stations pledge We look at a critical assessment of the way science is conducted at the International Space Station and finds it wanting. 18 The man behind the ISS 16 The Editor reflects on the life of recently Letter from the Editor deceased Jim Beggs, the NASA Administrator for whom the building of the ISS was his We are particularly pleased this supreme achievement. month to have two features which cover the spectrum of 22 Why don’t we just wing it? astronautical activities. Nick Spall Nick Spall FBIS examines the balance between gives us his critical assessment of winged lifting vehicles and semi-ballistic both winged and blunt-body re-entry vehicles for human space capsules, arguing that the former have been flight and Alan Stern reports on his grossly overlooked. research at the very edge of the 26 Parallels with Apollo 18 connected solar system – the Kuiper Belt. David Baker looks beyond the initial return to the We think of the internet and Moon by astronauts and examines the plan for a how it helps us communicate and sustained presence on the lunar surface. stay in touch, especially in these times of difficulty. But the fact that 28 Probing further in the Kuiper Belt in less than a lifetime we have Alan Stern provides another update on the gone from a tiny bleeping ball in pioneering work of New Horizons.
    [Show full text]
  • SPACE RESEARCH in POLAND Report to COMMITTEE
    SPACE RESEARCH IN POLAND Report to COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) 2020 Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and The Committee on Space and Satellite Research PAS Report to COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) ISBN 978-83-89439-04-8 First edition © Copyright by Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and The Committee on Space and Satellite Research PAS Warsaw, 2020 Editor: Iwona Stanisławska, Aneta Popowska Report to COSPAR 2020 1 SATELLITE GEODESY Space Research in Poland 3 1. SATELLITE GEODESY Compiled by Mariusz Figurski, Grzegorz Nykiel, Paweł Wielgosz, and Anna Krypiak-Gregorczyk Introduction This part of the Polish National Report concerns research on Satellite Geodesy performed in Poland from 2018 to 2020. The activity of the Polish institutions in the field of satellite geodesy and navigation are focused on the several main fields: • global and regional GPS and SLR measurements in the frame of International GNSS Service (IGS), International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS), International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS), European Reference Frame Permanent Network (EPN), • Polish geodetic permanent network – ASG-EUPOS, • modeling of ionosphere and troposphere, • practical utilization of satellite methods in local geodetic applications, • geodynamic study, • metrological control of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) equipment, • use of gravimetric satellite missions, • application of GNSS in overland, maritime and air navigation, • multi-GNSS application in geodetic studies. Report
    [Show full text]
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • SORS-2021-1.2.Pdf
    Office of Fellowships and Internships Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC The Smithsonian Opportunities for Research and Study Guide Can be Found Online at http://www.smithsonianofi.com/sors-introduction/ Version 1.1 (Updated August 2020) Copyright © 2021 by Smithsonian Institution Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 How to Use This Book .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Anacostia Community Museum (ACM) ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Archives of American Art (AAA) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Asian Pacific American Center (APAC) .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage (CFCH) ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum (CHNDM) .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Small Spacecraft Programs
    Planetary Science Deep Space SmallSat Studies Small Spacecraft Programs Carolyn Mercer Program Officer, PSDS3 Program Executive, SIMPLEx NASA Glenn Research Center Briefing to the Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG) April 4, 2018 Crystal City, VA NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted by NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology. This document is being made available for information purposes only, and any views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of NASA, JPL, or the 1 California Institute of Technology. SMD CubeSat/SmallSat Approach Planetary Science Deep Space SmallSat Studies National Academies Report (2016) concluded that CubeSats have proven their ability to produce high- value science: • Useful as targeted investigations to augment the capabilities of larger missions • Useful to make highly-specific measurements • Constellations of 10-100 CubeSat/SmallSat spacecraft have the potential to enable transformational science SMD is developing a directorate-wide approach to: • Identify high-priority science objectives in each discipline that can be addressed with CubeSats/SmallSats • Manage program with appropriate cost and risk • Establish a multi-discipline approach and collaboration that helps science teams learn from experiences and grow capability, while avoiding unnecessary duplication • Leverage and partner with a growing commercial sector to collaboratively drive instrument and sensor innovation 2 PLANETARY SCIENCE DEEP SPACE SMALLSAT
    [Show full text]
  • Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp
    Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp AIAA Space Mission System 2019-2020 Virginia Tech Aerospace Engineering Faculty Advisor : Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Team Members : Olivia Arthur, Bobby Aselford, Michel Becker, Patrick Crandall, Heidi Engebreth, Maedini Jayaprakash, Logan Lark, Nico Ortiz, Matthew Pieczynski, Brendan Ventura Member AIAA Number Member AIAA Number And Signature And Signature Faculty Advisor 25807 Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Brendan Ventura 1109196 Matthew Pieczynski 936900 Team Lead/Operations Logan Lark 902106 Heidi Engebreth 1109232 Structures & Environment Patrick Crandall 1109193 Olivia Arthur 999589 Power & Thermal Maedini Jayaprakash 1085663 Robert Aselford 1109195 CCDH/Operations Michel Becker 1109194 Nico Ortiz 1109533 Attitude, Trajectory, Orbits and Launch Vehicles Contents 1 Symbols and Acronyms 8 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Preface and Introduction 13 3.1 Project Management . 13 3.2 Problem Definition . 14 3.2.1 Background and Motivation . 14 3.2.2 RFP and Description . 14 3.2.3 Project Scope . 15 3.2.4 Disciplines . 15 3.2.5 Societal Sectors . 15 3.2.6 Assumptions . 16 3.2.7 Relevant Capital and Resources . 16 4 Value System Design 17 4.1 Introduction . 17 4.2 Analytical Hierarchical Process . 17 4.2.1 Longevity . 18 4.2.2 Expandability . 19 4.2.3 Scientific Return . 19 4.2.4 Risk . 20 4.2.5 Cost . 21 5 Initial Concept of Operations 21 5.1 Orbital Analysis . 22 5.2 Launch Vehicles . 22 6 Habitat Location 25 6.1 Introduction . 25 6.2 Region Selection . 25 6.3 Locations of Interest . 26 6.4 Eliminated Locations . 26 6.5 Remaining Locations . 27 6.6 Chosen Location .
    [Show full text]
  • Spacex CRS-10
    March 2017 Vol. 4 No. 3 National Aeronautics and Space Administration KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S magazine SpaceX CRS-10 SpaceX’s Falcon 9 takes off from historic Launch Pad 39A cementing Kennedy Space Center as a multi-user spaceport Earth Solar Aeronautics Mars Technology Right ISS System & NASA’S Research Now Beyond LAUNCH FROM OUR KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S SCHEDULE CENTER DIRECTOR SPACEPORT MAGAZINE Date: Targeted for March 19 Launch Window: 10:56 p.m. to 11:26 p.m. EDT Kennedy Space Center Mission: Orbital ATK Resupply Mission to solidifies multi-user CONTENTS International Space Station (CRS-7) Description: The Atlas V launch of Orbital spaceport status ATK’s Cygnus cargo craft from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida is targeted at 4 �������������������NASA cargo headed to space station on CRS-10 mission 12:29 a.m. EST, the beginning of a 30-minute As I reflect on the successful 10th window. Commercial Resupply Services mission, http://go.nasa.gov/2jetyfU with a SpaceX Falcon 9 and Dragon carrying 8 �������������������Fifth crop harvested aboard space station Date: April 10 supplies and experiments to the International Mission: Expedition 50 Undocking and Space Station, I realized every Kennedy Landing directorate had a role to play in the success Description: NASA astronaut Shane ����������������New plant habitat will increase harvest on station 10 Kimbrough and cosmonauts Sergey Ryzhikov of the mission. We truly are a multiuser and Andrey Borisenko of the Russian space spaceport. agency Roscosmos undock their Soyuz MS-02 Obviously, the role that Spaceport 18 ����������������Final work platform installed for Space Launch System spacecraft from the International Space Integration and Services played in supporting Station’s Poisk module and land in Kazakhstan.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Geology Tools Used During the Apollo Lunar Program and Their Suitability for Future Missions to the Om on Lindsay Kathleen Anderson
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2016 A Comparative Analysis Of The Geology Tools Used During The Apollo Lunar Program And Their Suitability For Future Missions To The oM on Lindsay Kathleen Anderson Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Anderson, Lindsay Kathleen, "A Comparative Analysis Of The Geology Tools Used During The Apollo Lunar Program And Their Suitability For Future Missions To The oonM " (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1860. https://commons.und.edu/theses/1860 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE GEOLOGY TOOLS USED DURING THE APOLLO LUNAR PROGRAM AND THEIR SUITABILITY FOR FUTURE MISSIONS TO THE MOON by Lindsay Kathleen Anderson Bachelor of Science, University of North Dakota, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota May 2016 Copyright 2016 Lindsay Anderson ii iii PERMISSION Title A Comparative Analysis of the Geology Tools Used During the Apollo Lunar Program and Their Suitability for Future Missions to the Moon Department Space Studies Degree Master of Science In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract #1643
    1/20/2017 CIM | TPMS | Abstract #1643 English Proving and Improving Martian Mining ISRU technology in Hawai`i The island of Hawai`i has been the stage for the only NASA ISRU field tests in 2008, 2010 and 2012. Focused on lunar ISRU and the RESOLVE/Resource Prospector Mission, much can be learned and developed from these experiences as applied to Martian ISRU. Hawaiian tephra has proven geochemical similarities to Mars, and also is the source of the geotechnical NASAJSC1A Mars Simulant. Hawaii is ideal for long term facilities/equipment testing and operational models needed prior to extended human missions to Mars. French No abstract title in French No French resume Author(s) and Co­Author(s) Mr. John C. Hamilton EPO: Logistics Manager PISCES ­ Pacific International Space Center for Exploration Systems https://www.cim.org/en/TPMS­Event/Chair/ChairAbstractPool.aspx 1/1 4/26/2017 CIM | TPMS | Profile of Mr. John Hamilton General Email(s): [email protected] Position: EPO: Logistics Manager Preferred Language: [Language not defined] Addresses Business Home PISCES ­ Pacific International Space Center for Exploration Systems PO Box 615 Pepeekeo Hawaii United States 96720 Biographies Biography submitted with the abstract John Hamilton is on faculty with the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Hawaii at Hilo, on the majestic island of Hawaii. As the Research Operations Manager of the newly formed PISCES (the Pacific International Space Center for Exploration Systems) in 2007 at the university, he managed multiple field tests with NASA, CSA, DLR, and ESA with surface technologies and ISRU. PISCES later was spun off as a State Agency, where John serves in the dual role of Education/Public Outreach and Logistics manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Sistema De Evaluación De Aprendizajes Para Alumnos En Situación De Extraedad
    Estrategia Integral para la Mejora del Logro Educativo Alianza por la Calidad de la Educación Sistema de evaluación de aprendizajes para alumnos en situación de extraedad Colección Hacia el Logro Educativo Programa para el Fortalecimiento del Logro Educativo Sistema de evaluación de aprendizajes para alumnos en situación de extraedad Colección Hacia el Logro Educativo Sistema de evaluación de aprendizajes para alumnos en situación de extraedad,es una publicación de la Dirección General de Desarrollo de la Gestión e Innovación Educativa de la Subsecretaría de Educación Básica, realizada a través del Proyecto para Atender a la Población en Situación de Extraedad, por encargo a la Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (OEI) y con la colaboración del Centro de Estudios Educativos (CEE). Alonso Lujambio Secretario de Educación Pública José Fernando González Sánchez Subsecretario de Educación Básica Coordinación general Alma Rosa Cuervo González Juan Martín Martínez Becerra Cuidado de la edición Director General de Desarrollo de la Gestión Esteban Manteca Aguirre e Innovación Educativa Jorge Humberto Miranda Vázquez Tonatiuh Arroyo Cerezo Ernesto Adolfo Ponce Rodríguez Coordinador General de Innovación Colaboradores de la Ofi cina de la Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura y autores de esta obra Lilia Dalila López Salmorán Coordinadora Nacional para el Fortalecimiento Coordinación del Logro Educativo Carlos Niembro Acosta Colaboradores Teresa Zamudio Gisela Santiago Benítez Maura Pompa Mancilla D.R. © Secretaría de Educación Pública, 2011 Diana Gómez Mayén Argentina 28 Col. Centro Histórico C.P. 06020, México, D.F. ISBN: 978-607-8017-53-9 Diseño y formación Constantine Editores, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment
    NASA Reference Publication 1390 - j Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield, R.D. Leach, and M.B. Alexander, Editor August 1996 NASA Reference Publication 1390 Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield Universities Space Research Association • Huntsville, Alabama R.D. Leach Computer Sciences Corporation • Huntsville, Alabama M.B. Alexander, Editor Marshall Space Flight Center • MSFC, Alabama National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center ° MSFC, Alabama 35812 August 1996 PREFACE The effects of the natural space environment on spacecraft design, development, and operation are the topic of a series of NASA Reference Publications currently being developed by the Electromagnetics and Aerospace Environments Branch, Systems Analysis and Integration Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center. This primer provides an overview of seven major areas of the natural space environment including brief definitions, related programmatic issues, and effects on various spacecraft subsystems. The primary focus is to present more than 100 case histories of spacecraft failures and anomalies documented from 1974 through 1994 attributed to the natural space environment. A better understanding of the natural space environment and its effects will enable spacecraft designers and managers to more effectively minimize program risks and costs, optimize design quality, and achieve mission objectives. .o° 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Science
    SMALL SATELLITE MISSIONS FOR PLANETARY SCIENCE Carolyn R. Mercer, Ph.D. Program Executive, Small Innovative Missions for Planetary Exploration (SIMPLEx) AIAA Small Spacecraft Missions Conference August 4, 2019 Logan, Utah Apollo 15 Particles and Fields Subsatellite (PFS-1) • 35 kg spacecraft flown with Apollo 15 in 1971 • Orbited the Moon for 6 months • Science mission: • Measured the strength and direction of interplanetary and terrestrial magnetic fields • Detected variations in the lunar gravity field • Measured proton and electron flux 2 NASA SCIENCE AN INTEGRATED PROGRAM Helio- Earth physics Science Planetary Astrophysics Science Joint Agency Satellite Division 4 Small Spacecraft for Planetary Science Astrobiology Science and Technology Instrument Development (ASTID) 2008 • O/OREOS (2010 launch) Small Innovative Missions for Planetary Exploration (SIMPLEx-1) 2014 • LunaH-Map, Q-PACE Directed and Partnered Secondary Payloads • MarCO (2018 launch) • LICIA Cube (2021) – potential ASI contribution Planetary Science Deep Space SmallSat Studies (PSDS3) 2017 • 19 Studies – Presented March 2018 at LPSC Small Innovative Missions for Planetary Exploration (SIMPLEx-2) 2018 • Janus, Escapade, Lunar Trailblazer • Next proposals due no earlier than June 2020 5 Planetary Science Deep Space SmallSat Studies Solicitation requested: • Concepts for planetary science missions • 180 kg total spacecraft mass limit • $100M cost cap • No constraints on rides, infrastructure, etc. Solicitation sought answers to: • Can deep space missions be credibly done
    [Show full text]