In the Transportation Division
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Punto De Acuerdo Por El Que Se Exhorta a La Agencia Reguladora De
PUNTO DE ACUERDO POR EL QUE SE EXHORTA A LA AGENCIA REGULADORA DE TRANSPORTE FERROVIARIO Y LA SECRETARÍA DE COMUNICACIONES Y TRANSPORTES QUE DEN A CONOCER LAS ESTRATEGIAS EN MATERIA FERROVIARIA CONTEMPLADAS PARA LA REGIÓN SUR-SURESTE DEL PAÍS DE ACUERDO AL PLAN “GRAN VISIÓN SISTEMA FERROVIARIO MEXICANO”. El suscrito Diputado Raúl Eduardo Bonifaz Moedano, integrante del Grupo Parlamentario de Morena de la LXIV Legislatura, con fundamento en los artículos 78, párrafo segundo, fracción III, de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos; 116 y 122, numeral 1, de la Ley Orgánica del Congreso General de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos; 58 y 60 del Reglamento para el Gobierno Interior del Congreso General de los Estados Unidos Mexicano, someto a consideración del Pleno de la Comisión Permanente, la siguiente proposición con punto de acuerdo por el que se exhorta a la agencia reguladora de transporte ferroviario y la secretaría de comunicaciones y transportes que den a conocer las estrategias en materia ferroviaria contempladas para la región sur- sureste del país de acuerdo al plan “Gran Visión Sistema Ferroviario Mexicano”. CONSIDERACIONES Los sistemas de transporte existen para proporcionar conexiones sociales y económicas que a la par brindan beneficios tanto al individuo como a la sociedad. En México, la primera concesión para abrir una ruta ferroviaria interoceánica se otorgó durante el gobierno del presidente Antonio López Santa Anna, los primeros avances de la construcción se dieron entre los años 1842 a 1879 y el 23 de enero de 1907 se inauguró el Ferrocarril Nacional de Tehuantepec, durante el periodo del presidente Porfirio Díaz, con 309 kilómetrosi. -
CP's North American Rail
2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR -
International Visitors to Mexico (Banxico) Domestic Tourism Hotel Activity
Results of Tourism Activity Mexico, January 2015 San Felipe, Baja California. San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas. Tequila Express, Jalisco. Chichén Itzá, Yucatán. Undersecretariat of Planning and Tourism Policy Index Outstanding Results, January 2015 ……...……..……..…….1 Analysis of Main Results in the Sector………………….... 3 Arrival to Mexico of International Visitors 3 Income of Foreign Currency to Mexico due to International Arrivals 4 Average Expense 5 Long-Stay Tourism 5 International Visitors to Mexico Arriving by Airplane 7 Domestic Tourism 9 Domestic Hotel Activity 10 Air transportation 10 Main Airports 12 Maritime Transportation 13 Main Ports 14 Macroeconomic Indicators 15 Appendix………………………………………………….…. 16 Reporting Date: March 17, 2015 Outstanding Results, January 2015 International Visitors to Mexico (Banxico) • According to Banco de México, the number of international tourists traveling to Mexico surpassed 2.6 million in January 2015, a new record high for any January month. • The incoming of foreign currency from international visitors to Mexico in January 2015 also was a high record, totaling 1,584 million dollars. • During January 2015 the tourism balance was positive, totaling 724 million dollars; number higher than the record achieved in any January period in a year. • International visitors increased 10.5% with respect to January 2014, reaching 7.3 million of visitors. Domestic tourism Hotel Activity • The percentage of hotel occupation in a group of 70 resorts was 2.40 percentage points higher in comparison to their occupation in January 2014, reaching 56.52%. • The arrival of domestic tourists to hotel rooms in these 70 resorts during January 2015 was more than 3.8 million people, being 8.9% higher than the number reached in 2014 during the same month. -
Estudio De Tequila
DIAGNÓSTICO DE COMPETITIVIDAD Y SUSTENTABILIDAD PARA LOS DENOMINADOS PUEBLOS MÁGICOS DE JALISCO Estudio de Tequila Diciembre de 2013 CONTENIDO DIAGNÓSTICO .................................................................................................. 4 1. PERFIL DEL DESTINO ............................................................................... 5 1.1. Localización geográfica ......................................................................... 5 1.2. Indicadores ............................................................................................ 5 1.3. Dinámica económica ............................................................................. 6 1.4. Seguridad pública ................................................................................. 8 2. RECURSOS NATURALES Y CULTURALES ........................................... 11 2.1. Aspectos naturales .............................................................................. 11 2.1.1. El Paisaje Agavero ....................................................................... 13 2.1.2. La Sierra Madre Occidental .......................................................... 15 2.1.3. La Barranca de Tequila ................................................................ 15 2.1.4. El Volcán de Tequila ..................................................................... 15 2.1.5. Cuerpos y caídas de agua ............................................................ 16 2.2. Aspectos culturales ............................................................................ -
Railroad Engineering 101 Session 38
Creating Value … … Providing Solutions Railroad Engineering 101 Session 38 Tuesday, February 19, 2013 Presented by: David Wilcock Railroad Engineering 101 . Outline . Overview of the Railroad . Track . Bridges . Signal Systems . Railroad Operations . Federal Railroad Administration . American Railway Engineering and Maintenance Association Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Classifications (Types) – Private – Common Carrier . Classifications (Function) – Line Haul – Switching – Belt Line – Terminal Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Classifications (Operating Revenues) – Class 1: $250 M or more – Class 2: $20.5 M - $249.9 M – Class 3: Less than $20 M . Classifications (Association of American Railroads Types) – Class I: $250 M or more – Regional: 350 miles or more; $40 M or more – Local – Switching and Terminal Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Class 1 Railroads – North America – BNSF – Canadian National – Canadian Pacific – CSX – Ferromex – Kansas City Southern – KCS de Mexico – Norfolk Southern – Union Pacific – Amtrak – VIA Rail Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Organization of a Railroad – Transportation » Train & Engine Crews » Dispatching » Operations – Engineering » All Right of Way Engineering – Mechanical » Equipment Maintenance – Marketing Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Equipment - Locomotives – All Units rated by Horsepower – Horsepower is converted to Tractive Effort to propel locomotive – Types: » Electric – Pantograph trolley or third rail shoe » Diesel-Electric – self contained electric power plant » Dual Mode – Can use either electric or diesel Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Equipment - Freight Cars – Boxcar – Flatcar – Gondola – Covered Hopper – Coal Hopper – Tank Car – Auto Racks – Container “Tubs or Boats” Railroad Engineering 101 . Overview of the Railroad . Resistance – Resistance is important especially for freight operations as they are dealing with heavy loads. -
October Final.Indd
RAIL REPORT October 2014 • NO. 651 Rocky Mountain Railroad Club • Rocky Mountain Railroad Historical Foundation The Rocky Mountain Railroad Club Banquet Luncheon October 11, 2014 Socializing at 11:30 AM – Program At Noon – Lunch Follows Theater Room 1600 17th Street Downtown Denver Featuring Guest Speaker — “Dr. Colorado” — Dr. Tom Noel Presenting “The History of Denver Union Station and The Railways of Denver” Dr. Tom Noel’s banquet program will show how Denver grew outward along a spider web of streetcar tracks. He will argue that Denver is going back to the future with RTD’s Fast Tracks, reinventing a once intact street railway system. He will also discuss the reincarnation of Union Station as guess what – a rail hub! RMRRC Calendar November 11th Meeting and Program, “Rollins Pass Rail History.” December 9th Annual Meeting and Program. January 13th, 2015 Meeting and Program, “Soo Line, Milwaukee Road, and DSS&A” by Ron Kaminen and Dave Rasmussen.” Due to circumstances beyond our control, programs and dates are subject to change without notice. Please contact Dave Schaaf with program ideas at [email protected] or 303 988-3456. The History of Denver Union Station and The Railways of Denver Photographed from Union Depot in 1885, six horse cars are seen on 17th Street outside the Denver City Railway Company building. – William H. Jackson Photo, Denver Public Library collection. Car 818 with the sign that advises riders of the last day of operations, June 3, 1950. – Photo Denver Public Library collection. Rocky Mountain Rail Report • Page 2 • October 2014 The History of Denver Union Station and The Railways of Denver Car 845 promotes Denver. -
Weekly Rail Review for the Week Ending
WEEKLY RAIL REVIEW FOR THE WEEK ENDING SAT, JULY 1, 2006 BY DAVE MEARS (NOTE: “ffd” indicates a reference “for further details.”) THE WEEK’S TOP RAIL AND TRANSIT NEWS (in chronological order): (SUN) Extended and widespread rainstorms, continuing from the previous week, notably disrupted passenger and freight train operations in the northeastern U.S. On Monday and due to washouts on CSX, Amtrak canceled service south of Washington, DC, except for its Auto Train. MARC and VRE commuter trains to and from Washington, except for MARC Penn Line service, were also canceled on Monday. On Wednesday, an extensive washout on the CSX Albany-Buffalo main line near Amsterdam, NY halted all train service on that route. CSX was able to one track back in service by Thursday evening and the second track back in service by Friday evening, but so many freight trains had been held that Amtrak trains on that route were suspended through Sunday, July 2 to clear out the freight train backlog. Canadian Pacific Railway lines in the Binghamton, NY area were also affected, with CPR reporting 7 washouts on the line from Binghamton south to the Norfolk Southern connection at Sunbury, PA. NS reported no damage to its Southern Tier line between Binghamton and Buffalo, but said that closed floodgates had halted rail service on the line since Tuesday. Rains and resulting floodwaters began to subside later in the week. (ffd: Amtrak, NARP, Trains, wire services) (SUN) The Chicago Transit Authority inaugurated service on its new Pink line. The line, which runs over existing subway-elevated trackage, operates between the 54th-Cermack station in Cicero and the Chicago Loop. -
UNP Pitchbook 5.20.2020
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION May 2020 Cautionary Information This presentation and related materials contain statements about the Company’s future that are not statements of historical fact, including specifically the statements regarding the Company’s expectations with respect to economic conditions and demand levels; its ability to generate financial returns, improve resource productivity; enhancing the customer experience; implementing corporate strategies; and providing excellent service to its customers, returns to its shareholders and potential impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic. These statements are, or will be, forward-looking statements as defined within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward- looking statements also generally include, without limitation, information or statements regarding: projections, predictions, expectations, estimates or forecasts as to the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ business, financial, and operational results, and future economic performance; and management’s beliefs, expectations, goals, and objectives and other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that, or by which, such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking information, including expectations regarding operational and financial improvements and the Company’s future performance or results are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statement. Important factors, including risk factors, could affect the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. -
2020 Building America Report a Report to Our Stakeholders on Union Pacific’S Environmental, Social and Governance Initiatives and Achievements
Steven Boyd Christian Deneumostier John Richard Jessica Marsa Aris Garcia Jr Berkeley, IL Omaha, NE System Gang Omaha, NE Menlo Park, CA Brittany Miller Matthew Havard Chuck Wullschleger Joe Downs Thomas Hottenrott Omaha, NE De Soto, MO System Gang Omaha, NE Dupo, IL Richard Estrada Joshy Madathil Jimmy Thompson Jenn Dellacqua Demarcus Thompson System Gang Omaha, NE Cheyenne, WY Omaha, NE Crystal Lake, IL Adrienne Jensen Jose Guzman Atosha Coleman Bryan Prince Yolanda Delgado Omaha, NE Omaha, NE Omaha, NE Fort Worth, TX Omaha, NE Henry Ward III Sharron Jourdan Booker Williams Marypat Dennis Jon Ruda Kansas City, MO Roseville, CA Fort Worth, TX Omaha, NE Omaha, NE 2020 Building America Report A report to our stakeholders on Union Pacific’s environmental, social and governance initiatives and achievements. 1 About the Report Union Pacific’s vision of Building America means we connect the nation’s businesses and communities to each other and the world by providing safe, reliable and efficient supply chain solutions. In doing so, we strive to serve our customers, enhance shareholder value, invest in our communities and provide promising careers, while operating in an ethical manner. Together, these actions allow Union Pacific to build a more sustainable future. This report details progress in our four areas of concentration related to environmental, social, and governance issues: investing in our workforce, driving sustainable solutions, championing environmental stewardship and strengthening our communities. This report also summarizes our 2020 financial performance and, new this year, includes a Facts and Figures section. We used the Global Reporting Initiative’s global sustainability reporting standards as a framework to report our most material social responsibility issues, and are reporting our GRI Standards Index data for the first time. -
Proyectos De Ferrocarril En México
FICHA FS SECTOR MÉXICO Proyectos de ferrocarril en México A. CIFRAS CLAVE México se sitúa en el puesto 54.º de 141 países en cuanto a la calidad de su infraestructura, según el ranking del Foro Económico Mundial en 2019. Sin embargo, la situación de las diferentes áreas de infraestructura es muy desigual. Así, los buenos datos en cuanto a competitividad vial (7), donde se han realizado importantes inversiones en los últimos años, contrastan con los de los servicios ferroviarios, por los que México se situaría en el puesto 58.º del citado ranking. Por tanto, es necesario que el país siga invirtiendo en infraestructura para mejorar su competitividad. El sistema ferroviario mexicano está compuesto por una extensa y eficiente red de transporte de carga que está, además, integrada con la de EE. UU., y un casi inexistente sistema de transporte de pasajeros. Hay que tener en cuenta que el sistema ferroviario de carga se privatizó entre los años 1996 y 1998, de forma que actualmente FERROMEX, FERROSUR de Grupo México y Kansas City Southern de México (antes Transportación Ferroviaria Mexicana) acaparan más del 90 % del transporte. En cuanto al transporte de pasajeros, este se circunscribe a los proyectos de metro en CDMX y Monterrey, algunos trenes ligeros (Toluca-CDMX, Guadalajara), el tren suburbano que circula entre CDMX y Estado de México y el tren turístico del Chepe en Chihuahua. El proyecto de transporte de pasajeros más ambicioso presentado en los últimos años fue el tren rápido Querétaro-CDMX que se adjudicó en 2014 aunque después fue cancelado. A pesar del poco desarrollo del sistema de transporte de pasajeros por ferrocarril en México, la actual administración ha incluido dos como proyectos prioritarios, el Tren Maya y el Corredor Transístmico que ya están en proceso de construcción. -
Rail Harmonization in Mexico and North America: Implications for Agriculture
RAIL HARMONIZATION IN MEXICO AND NORTH AMERICA: IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURE Barry E. Prentice,Wade Derkson and Arnold Maltz INTRODUCTION The North American railway landscape has changed significantly and irreversibly in the last few years. A "NAFTA railroad" has emerged with the acquisition of the Illinois Central (IC) by Canadian National (CN) and the subsequent marketing agreement with the Kansas City Southern (KCS). The largest Canadian railway, itself privatized only a few years ago, now offers single-line access to the Mexican market with the privatized Transportacion Ferroviario Mexicano (TFM). From a shipper's perspective, the new map of North America increasingly resembles a hyperlinked web page, "with the shipper able to start anywhere and end up in places he or she never imagined." (Possehl, 1998). Few North American shippers would have imagined a railway system that could include the much- maligned Mexican rail links. However, the once disparate parts of the North American rail network have re-emerged under private control with the promise of integrating NAFTA trade, and in particular, the trade of agricultural products. This paper examines the implications of the Mexican rail concessions for NAFTA trade of agricultural products. Specifically the paper focuses on whether or not privatization, particularly of the rail links in the Northeast (TFM) and the Pacific North (Ferromex), are likely to support overland movement of agricultural products within the three NAFTA signatories. The effect of rail privatization on freight rates is especially important because the geographic flow patterns of low-valued bulky agricultural commodities such as grains are sensitive to transport and logistics costs. -
Regulatory Capacity Building Tools for Analysing Rail Connectivity
CPB Corporate Partnership Board Regulatory Capacity Building Tools for Analysing Rail Connectivity Case-Specific Policy Analysis Regulatory Capacity Building Tools for Analysing Rail Connectivity Case-Specific Policy Analysis The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 59 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States.