DOCSLIB.ORG

9Th Annual State of Agile Survey Was Conducted Between Company Experience and Adoption 6 July and October, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9Th Annual State of Agile Survey Was Conducted Between Company Experience and Adoption 6 July and October, 2014 9TH ANNUAL State of Agile™ Survey VERSIONONE.COM ©2015 VersionOne, Inc. All rights reserved. State of Agile is a trademark of VersionOne, Inc. and VersionOne is a registered trademark of VersionOne, Inc. STATE OF AGILE Executive Summary AGILE MOMENTUM MEASURING AGILE SUCCESS CONTINUES We asked several new questions this year to find out how organizations measure the success of agile, both on a Agile development—once a predominantly team-based day-to-day basis and for their agile initiatives overall. At the practice—is grabbing the attention of the business. This project level, most respondents tracked velocity, iteration year’s State of Agile™ survey found that more burndown and release burndown. The value of agile overall companies—and bigger companies—are scaling and was measured primarily by on-time delivery, product quality, embracing agile as part of the larger vision to deliver and customer/user satisfaction metrics. software faster, easier, and smarter. Ninety-four percent (94%) of all organizations surveyed now practice agile. In 2013, the majority of respondents had SCALING METHODOLOGIES fewer than 1,000 people in their software organization. But AND TIPS FOR SUCCESS in 2014, approximately 35% of respondents had more than With more energy put into scaling agile across the 5,000 people in their organization, and 20% worked in very enterprise, the 2014 survey results showed more interest in large organizations with more than 20,000 people. the various scaling methodologies such as the Scaled Agile Framework® (SAFe®), Large-Scale Scrum (LeSS), Disciplined In addition, 45% of this year’s respondents worked in Agile Delivery (DAD), Scrum of Scrums, Agile Portfolio development organizations where the majority of their Management (APM) and others. Which were the preferred teams are agile. Contrast this with the 2009 report, which scaling methodologies of the year? The overwhelming found that (31%) of the respondents worked in response was Scrum of Scrums (69%), followed by internal organizations with only zero to two teams practicing agile. methods (25%), SAFe (19%), and Lean (18%). Agile is spreading geographically, too. From 2012 to 2014, According to the data, the number-one tip for scaling agile the percentage of respondents who had distributed teams successfully is having consistent process and practices practicing agile jumped from 35% to 80%. (42%), followed by executive sponsorship (40%) and the implementation of a common platform across teams (39%). BENEFITS OF AGILE There is plenty of evidence to conclude that agile works. AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT For four years running, the top three benefits of agile development remain: PRACTICES AND TOOLS Scrum still dominates as the agile methodology of choice 1. Ability to manage changing priorities (87%) (56%), while pure XP - practiced by nearly one-quarter of respondents in the 2006 report was virtually non-existent in 2. Team productivity (84%) 2014 (<1%). Project visibility (82%) 3. In general, the use of agile project management tools was Furthermore, 53% of respondents said that the majority, if up. In fact, in a year-over-year comparison, respondents’ not all, of their agile projects have been successful. future plans to use various tools doubled in every category of tool sets. Most people used Microsoft® Excel or Project; When asked what causes agile to fail, respondents pointed however, satisfaction rates were the highest with solutions to lack of experience with agile methods (44%). built specifically for agile. The top three preferred project management solutions were VersionOne (92%), Atlassian/JIRA (86%) and LeanKit (85%). VERSIONONE.COM 2 ©2015 VersionOne, Inc. All rights reserved. State of Agile is a trademark of VersionOne, Inc. and VersionOne is a registered trademark of VersionOne, Inc. Scaled Agile Framework and SAFe are registered trademarks of Lengwell, LLC. Respondent Demographics 4 ABOUT THE SURVEY The 9th annual State of Agile survey was conducted between Company Experience and Adoption 6 July and October, 2014. Sponsored by VersionOne, the Benefits of Agile 8 survey invited individuals from a broad range of industries in the Agile Methods and Practices 9 global software development community. A total of 3,925 completed responses were Agile Success and Metrics 10 collected, analyzed and prepared into a summary report by Scaling Agile 13 Analysis.Net Research, an independent survey consultancy. Project Management Tools 14 VERSIONONE.COM 3 ©2015 VersionOne, Inc. All rights reserved. State of Agile is a trademark of VersionOne, Inc. and VersionOne is a registered trademark of VersionOne, Inc. 9th ANNUAL STATE OF AGILE STATE OF AGILE™ Respondent Demographics SURVEY SIZE OF ORGANIZATION WHO RESPONDED Project/Program Manager 24% 53% 35% 20% Development Sta of all had more worked in 22% respondents than 5,000 very large Development Leadership had more people in organizations 14% than 1,000 their entire with more people organization than 20,000 Other (ScrumMaster or Internal Coach) 13% in their people software Product Owner/ organization Business Analyst 13% Consultant/Trainer 8% IT Sta 3% C-Level 3% 21% from 65% Europe from North America The majority were from North America and Europe. VERSIONONE.COM 4 ©2015 VersionOne, Inc. All rights reserved. State of Agile is a trademark of VersionOne, Inc. and VersionOne is a registered trademark of VersionOne, Inc. 9th ANNUAL STATE OF AGILE STATE OF AGILE™ Respondent Demographics SURVEY INDUSTRIES Most respondents (25%) worked for software/ISV companies. In addition, a significant number of respondents worked for financial services (12%) and professional services (11%) organizations. *Write-in responses were commonly Education, Consulting, Energy, Oil, Construction, and Non-Profit 25% 12% 11% 11% 7% 6% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 1% 1% Public Software (ISV)Financial ServicesProfessionalOther* Services Healthcare GovernmentManufacturingTelecom Retail Media & EntertainmentInternet ServiceInsurance TransportationConsumer ProductsUtilities Services PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH AGILE DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES Ninety percent (90%) of respondents said they are at least knowledgeable (1+ year of experience) about agile software development techniques. Additionally, 58% said they are ‘very’ to ‘extremely’ knowledgeable about agile (3+ years of experience). 28% 30% 32% 10% Extremely Very Moderately Minimal/ knowledgeable… knowledgeable… knowledgeable… no knowledge… 5+ years 3-4 years 1-2 years Less than 6 months VERSIONONE.COM 5 ©2015 VersionOne, Inc. All rights reserved. State of Agile is a trademark of VersionOne, Inc. and VersionOne is a registered trademark of VersionOne, Inc. 9th ANNUAL STATE OF AGILE STATE OF AGILE™ Company Experience and Adoption SURVEY COMPANY EXPERIENCE HOW MANY? HOW LONG? The number of organizations that practice agile. 2014 2013 <1 year: 15% 8% 1-2 years: 29% 40% 94% 3-5 years: 32% 33% 5+ years: 24% 19% 2014 Approximately 24% of respondents worked in organizations that have practiced agile for greater than five years, up from 19% in 2013. PERCENTAGE OF TEAMS USING AGILE A total of 45% of respondents worked in 36% development organizations where the More than half of 5% our teams are majority of their teams are agile. Only 5% of None of our teams are agile respondents work in a completely agile traditional/non-agile development organization. Contrast this with the 2009 report, in which (31%) of the respondents worked where there were only zero to two teams practicing agile! 9% All of our 50% teams are agile Less than half of our teams are agile VERSIONONE.COM 6 ©2015 VersionOne, Inc. All rights reserved. State of Agile is a trademark of VersionOne, Inc. and VersionOne is a registered trademark of VersionOne, Inc. 9th ANNUAL STATE OF AGILE STATE OF AGILE™ Company Experience and Adoption SURVEY REASONS FOR ADOPTING AGILE Consistent with last year, most respondents adopted agile practices to accelerate product delivery (59%) or enhance their ability to manage changing priorities (56%). However, in 2014, productivity (53%) has moved into the top 3, outranking last year’s #3 response—improved IT and business alignment. *Respondents were able to make multiple selections. Accelerate product delivery 59% Enhance ability to manage changing priorities 56% Increase productivity 53% Enhance software quality 46% Enhance delivery predictability 44% Improve business/IT alignment 40% Improve project visibility 40% Reduce project risk 38% Improve team morale 26% Improve engineering discipline 25% Reduce project cost 23% Increase software maintainability 22% Better manage distributed teams 20% DISTRIBUTED AGILE MATURITY AGILE TEAMS More than 90% of respondents’ organizations had adopted agile in their software organizations. Nearly 80% of respondents had at least some distributed teams practicing agile within their organizations, up from 35% just two years earlier. 34% 42% 18% Had teams that Had teams ranging Had teams with are in the early from very early to mature adoption adoption phase mature adoption 2014 2012 with agile VERSIONONE.COM 7 ©2015 VersionOne, Inc. All rights reserved. State of Agile is a trademark of VersionOne, Inc. and VersionOne is a registered trademark of VersionOne, Inc. 9th ANNUAL STATE OF AGILE STATE OF AGILE™ Benefits of Agile SURVEY of respondents said implementing agile improved 87% their ability to manage changing priorities. said that the majority, if not all, of their 53% agile projects have been successful. ACTUAL IMPROVEMENTS FROM IMPLEMENTING AGILE For four years running, the top three benefits of adopting agile remain the same: manage changing priorities (87%), team productivity (84%), and project visibility (82%). % GOT BETTER % NO CHANGE % DON’T KNOW % GOT WORSE Ability to manage changing priorities 87 2 10 <1 Increased team productivity 384 12 1 Improved project visibility 482 13 <1 Increased team morale/motivation 79 6 12 3 Better delivery predictability 79 6 12 2 Enhanced software quality 78 6 15 2 Faster time to market 777 15 1 Reduced project risk 76 6 17 <1 Improved business/IT alignment 75 6 18 1 Improved engineering discipline 72 7 20 2 Enhanced software maintainability 968 21 2 Better manage distributed teams 59 12 27 2 VERSIONONE.COM 8 ©2015 VersionOne, Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Management Software March 2019
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE MARCH 2019 Powered by Methodology CONTENTS 3 Introduction 5 Defining Project Management Software 6 FrontRunners (Small Vendors) 8 FrontRunners (Enterprise Vendors) 10 Runners Up 22 Methodology Basics 2 INTRODUCTION his FrontRunners analysis minimum qualifying score of 3.96 Tis a data-driven assessment for Usability and 3.91 for User identifying products in the Project Recommended, while the Small Management software market that Vendor graphic had a minimum offer the best capability and value qualifying score of 4.55 for Usability for small businesses. For a given and 4.38 for User Recommended. market, products are evaluated and given a score for Usability (x-axis) To be considered for the Project and User Recommended (y-axis). Management FrontRunners, a FrontRunners then plots 10-15 product needed a minimum of 20 products each on a Small Vendor user reviews published within 18 and an Enterprise Vendor graphic, months of the evaluation period. based on vendor business size, per Products needed a minimum user category. rating score of 3.0 for both Usability and User Recommended in both In the Project Management the Small and Enterprise graphics. FrontRunners infographic, the Enterprise Vendor graphic had a 3 INTRODUCTION The minimum score cutoff to be included in the FrontRunners graphic varies by category, depending on the range of scores in each category. No product with a score less than 3.0 in either dimension is included in any FrontRunners graphic. For products included, the Usability and User Recommended scores determine their positions on the FrontRunners graphic. 4 DEFINING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE roject management software and document management, as well Phelps organizations manage as at least one of the following: time and deliver projects on time, on tracking, budgeting, and resource budget and within scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Visual Studio Team System Work in Your Organisation Streamline Your Bug Handling and Development Management System
    Making Visual Studio Team System work in your Organisation Streamline your bug handling and development management system Bikes and Mackas… News Flash Visual Studio Team Edition for Database Professionals •New Visual Studio Database Project – import your database schema and put under source control. – build update scripts or packages and provides a deploy tool to the specified database. • Rename Refactoring • New T-SQL Editor • SchemaCompare • DataCompare • Database Unit Testing – using T-SQL or managed code. • DataGenerator – data based upon your existing production databases – can be deployed to a database prior to running unit tests thus ensuring consistent test results About Adam • Chief Architect for www.ssw.com.au doing: – internal corporate development and – generic off-the-shelf databases – Clients: Royal & SunAlliance, Westbus, Microsoft… • SSW Develops custom solutions for businesses across a range of industries such as Government, banking, insurance and manufacturing since 1990 • President .Net User Group, Sydney • Speaker for Microsoft TechEd and Roadshows, Dev Conn, VSLive…. • Microsoft Regional Director, Australia • [email protected] Agenda 1.History of Bug Systems 2. Exploring VSTS / TFS (a tour) 3. What’s wrong with VSTS for me 4. The Education - What you can customize 5. The Solution - including 3rd Parties How Bug Tracking Systems Work • Everyone needs one – even Microsoft! • Basic Requirements –Searchable – Reportable – Notifications when done •Nice-To-Haves – Source Control Integration – IDE integration (optional)
    [Show full text]
  • A Platform for Software Debugging and Crash Reporting
    Backtrace - A Platform for Software Debugging and Crash Reporting The Backtrace Vision 1 The Backtrace Platform 2 Capture 2 Analyze 3 Resolve 4 Comparing Backtrace with Generic Error Monitoring Tools 5 Backtrace Advantages 6 Feature & Capabilities List 8 The Backtrace Vision Backtrace was founded with a vision to build the best cross-platform, native application crash and error reporting technology for today’s complex software, video game systems, embedded technology, and IoT devices. The software development teams that work in these environments now have a greater impact on how the company performs. When software fails to perform consistently, customers will disappear and employees will function less efficiently. Backtrace developed a platform that empowers organizations to make new and better choices for investing in software. The Backtrace platform has broken new ground with technology that: A. Captures and analyzes crash data from multiple platforms, including desktop (Windows, Mac), mobile (iOS, Android) server systems (Linux), embedded devices (Linux, RTOS), and video game consoles, with new levels of granularity. B. Provides teams with easy to use analytics to prioritize bugs and application failures based on their impact. C. Enables collaboration and integration with the tools you have in place today to speed ability to resolve the issue. Page 1 of 9 Proprietary The Backtrace Platform Backtrace gives your team the automation and diagnostic tools they need to spot errors that matter, understand their impact, explore the context, and zero in on causes in hours or minutes instead of days or weeks. Backtrace is a turn-key solution that was purpose-built for crash and exception analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Development Process Improvements - Case QPR Software Plc
    Software development process improvements - Case QPR Software Plc Lidia Zalevskaya Master’s Thesis Degree Programme in Information Systems Management 2019 Abstract Date: 2019.11.24 Author(s) Lidia Zalevskaya Degree programme Information Systems Management, Master’s Degree Thesis title Number of pages and appendix pages Software development process improvements - 98 + 26 Case QPR Software Plc Initially this study was planned as an effort to improve on a software development process within an existing team using an existing product code and systems. However, the situation changed and a new team (DevApps team) was established and given a new project, which created an opportunity to build a new type of team, product, process, and tools pipeline from scratch utilizing the improvement ideas. An Action Research framework was adopted as the theoretical approach for the study, while the Scrum methodology served as a framework for the development practices. The study began by summarizing previously identified problems in the software development process at QPR Software Plc and formulating improvement ideas focused on the coding workflow and Scrum practices. These were then tested in practice by the new DevApps scrum team. The research analysis centres on the process of choosing and setting up the new team’s development tools, figuring out ways of working, and implementing several iterations to find the best suitable development process. The most valuable empirical outcomes were the creation of a branching strategy and Git workflow for the DevApps team, the team members’ practical experience of working with Git and with the Azure DevOps developer services. A key outcome was the shift in many verification activities to earlier phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Jenkins Job Builder Documentation Release 3.10.0
    Jenkins Job Builder Documentation Release 3.10.0 Jenkins Job Builder Maintainers Aug 23, 2021 Contents 1 README 1 1.1 Developers................................................1 1.2 Writing a patch..............................................2 1.3 Unit Tests.................................................2 1.4 Installing without setup.py........................................2 2 Contents 5 2.1 Quick Start Guide............................................5 2.1.1 Use Case 1: Test a job definition................................5 2.1.2 Use Case 2: Updating Jenkins Jobs...............................5 2.1.3 Use Case 3: Working with JSON job definitions........................6 2.1.4 Use Case 4: Deleting a job...................................6 2.1.5 Use Case 5: Providing plugins info...............................6 2.2 Installation................................................6 2.2.1 Documentation.........................................7 2.2.2 Unit Tests............................................7 2.2.3 Test Coverage..........................................7 2.3 Configuration File............................................7 2.3.1 job_builder section.......................................8 2.3.2 jenkins section.........................................9 2.3.3 hipchat section.........................................9 2.3.4 stash section...........................................9 2.3.5 __future__ section.......................................9 2.4 Running.................................................9 2.4.1 Test Mode...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Create a Pull Request in Bitbucket
    Create A Pull Request In Bitbucket Waverley is unprofitably bombastic after longsome Joshuah swings his bentwood bounteously. Despiteous Hartwell fathomsbroaches forcibly. his advancements institutionalized growlingly. Barmiest Heywood scandalize some dulocracy after tacit Peyter From an effect is your own pull remote repo bitbucket create the event handler, the bitbucket opens the destination branch for a request, if i am facing is Let your pet see their branches, commit messages, and pull requests in context with their Jira issues. You listen also should the Commits tab at the top gave a skill request please see which commits are included, which provide helpful for reviewing big pull requests. Keep every team account to scramble with things, like tablet that pull then got approved, when the build finished, and negotiate more. Learn the basics of submitting a on request, merging, and more. Now we made ready just send me pull time from our seven branch. Awesome bitbucket cloud servers are some nifty solutions when pull request a pull. However, that story ids will show in the grasp on all specified stories. Workzone can move the trust request automatically when appropriate or a percentage of reviewers have approved andor on successful build results. To cost up the webhook and other integration parameters, you need two set although some options in Collaborator and in Bitbucket. Go ahead but add a quote into your choosing. If you delete your fork do you make a saw, the receiver can still decline your request ask the repository to pull back is gone. Many teams use Jira as the final source to truth of project management.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiraplan External Bug Tracking Integration Guide
    SpiraTest / SpiraTeam / SpiraPlan® | External Bug-Tracking Integration Guide Inflectra Corporation Date: July 8th, 2019 Contents Introduction SpiraTest® provides an integrated, holistic Introduction ........................................... 1 Quality Assurance (QA) management solution that manages requirements, tests and incidents 1. Setting up Data Synchronization ...... 2 in one environment, with complete traceability from inception to completion. 2. Using SpiraTeam with JIRA 5+ ........ 9 SpiraTeam® is an integrated Application 3. Using SpiraTeam with JIRA 3 / 4.... 34 Lifecycle Management (ALM) system that manages your project's requirements, releases, 4. Using SpiraTest with Bugzilla ......... 48 test cases, issues and tasks in one unified environment. SpiraTeam® contains all of the 5. Using SpiraTest with MS-TFS ........ 60 features provided by SpiraTest® - our highly acclaimed quality assurance system and 6. Using SpiraTest with FogBugz ....... 84 SpiraPlan® - our agile-enabled project management solution. 7. Using SpiraTeam with Mantis ......... 96 However, many organizations may be already 8. Using SpiraTeam with ClearQuest 107 using other bug-tracking systems and not want to have to migrate all their users over to 9. Using SpiraTeam with IBM RTC... 119 SpiraTeam. Therefore SpiraPlan, SpiraTest and SpiraTeam are capable of integrating with a 10. Using Spira with Axosoft 14+ ..... 127 variety of commercial and open-source bug- tracking systems. 11. Using SpiraTeam with Redmine . 138 This guide outlines how to integrate and use 12. Using Spira with VersionOne...... 149 SpiraTest, SpiraPlan and SpiraTeam in conjunction with other external Bug/Issue 13. Using Spira with OnTime 11 ....... 159 Tracking systems. 14. Using Spira with GitHub ............. 172 This guide assumes that the reader is familiar with both SpiraTeam and the appropriate tool 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Agile Project Management Tools
    BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES Volume 19, No 4 Sofia 2019 Print ISSN: 1311-9702; Online ISSN: 1314-4081 DOI: 10.2478/cait-2019-0033 Agile Project Management Tools: A Brief Comprative View Deniz Özkan1,2, Alok Mishra2 1Havelsan, A.Ş., 06510, Mustafa Kemal, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey 2Department of Software Engineering, Atilim University, Turkey E-mails: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract: Agile methodologies are becoming popular in software development. Managers are required to understand project’s progress and product quality without development documents. During Agile practices of the teams and organizations, Agile project management tools are frequently used. The use of such tools leads to achieving speed and efficiency, affects the quality of the software. The quality of final product is mostly related with to project management. Accordingly, the paper provides brief comparative perspective about the popular project management tools for agile projects. 16 popular Agile project management tools have been presented helping agile developers to plan and manage their tasks in an efficient manner. Taiga, Axosoft, Agielan, Planbox are more appropriate for start-up projects. The most twitted and most appreciated tools are reported as Jira, Trello, and VersionOne. SpiraTeam by Inflectra and Pivotal Tracker are other pricing and popular agile tools, providing flexibility to Agile developers and increase collaboration among team members. Keywords: Agile Methodologies, Agile Project Management Tool, Tools, Software Project Management. 1. Introduction Presently, Agile software development method is becoming popular as it helps organizations to develop software projects faster. Most organizations (71%), mention that by using this methodology, projects are 28% more successful than projects managed with traditional methods [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Buyers Guide Product Listings
    BUYERS GUIDE PRODUCT LISTINGS Visual Studio Magazine Buyers’ Guide Product Listings The 2009 Visual Studio Magazine Buyers’ Guide listings comprise more than 700 individual products and services, ranging from developer tooling and UI components to Web hosting and instructor-led training. Included for each product is contact and pricing information. Keep in mind that many products come in multiple SKUs and with varied license options, so it’s always a good idea to contact vendors directly for specific pricing. The developer tools arena is a vast and growing space. As such, we’re always on the prowl for new tools and vendors. Know of a product our readers might want to learn more about? E-mail us at [email protected]. BUG & FEATURE TRACKING Gemini—CounterSoft Starts at $1189 • countersoft.com • +44 (0)1753 824000 Rational ClearQuest—IBM Rational Software $1,810 • ibm.com/rational • 888-426-3774 IssueNet Intercept—Elsinore Technologies Call for price • elsitech.com • 866-866-0034 FogBugz 7.0—Fog Creek Software $199 • fogcreek.com • 888-364-2849; 212-279-2076 SilkPerformer—Borland Call for price • borland.com • 800-632-2864; 512-340-2200 OnTime 2009 Professional—Axosoft Starts at $795 for five users • axosoft.com • 800-653-0024; SourceOffSite 4.2—SourceGear 480-362-1900 $239 • sourcegear.com • 217-356-0105 Alexsys Team 2.10—Alexsys Surround SCM 2009—Seapine Software Starts at $145 • alexcorp.com • 888-880-2539; 781-279-0170 Call for price • seapine.com • 888-683-6456; 513-754-1655 AppLife DNA—Kinetic Jump Software TeamInspector—Borland
    [Show full text]
  • Estudos Preliminares
    IGOR BESSA MENEZE PODER JUDICIÁRIO S JOSE MARIO VIANA JUSTIÇA DO TRABALHO BARBOSA JUNIOR LENIVIA TRIBUNAL REGIONAL DO TRABALHO DA 7ª REGIÃO DE CASTRO E SILVA MENDES FRANCISC O JONATHAN SECRETARIA DE TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMAÇÃO E COMUNICAÇÃO REBOUCAS MAIA Estudos Preliminares Contratação de Suporte Técnico, incluindo atualizações evolutivas e corretivas, para a ferramenta Atlassian Jira e Plugins eazyBI Reports and Charts e Git Integration. Estudos Preliminares - Contratação de Suporte Técnico, incluindo atualizações evolutivas e corretivas, para a ferramenta Atlassian Jira e Plugins eazyBI Reports and Charts e Git Integration. 1 PODER JUDICIÁRIO JUSTIÇA DO TRABALHO TRIBUNAL REGIONAL DO TRABALHO DA 7ª REGIÃO SECRETARIA DE TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMAÇÃO E COMUNICAÇÃO Sumário ANÁLISE DE VIABILIDADE DA CONTRATAÇÃO (Art.14) 4 Contextualização 4 Definição e Especificação dos Requisitos da Demanda (Art. 14, I) 5 Requisitos de Negócio 5 Requisitos Técnicos 6 Requisitos Temporais 6 Soluções Disponíveis no Mercado de TIC (Art. 14, I, a) 7 Contratações Públicas Similares (Art. 14, I, b) 10 Outras Soluções Disponíveis (Art. 14, II, a) 11 Portal do Software Público Brasileiro (Art. 14, II, b) 11 Alternativa no Mercado de TIC (Art. 14, II, c) 12 Modelo Nacional de Interoperabilidade – MNI (Art. 14, II, d) 12 Infraestrutura de Chaves Públicas Brasileira – ICP-Brasil (Art. 14, II, e) 12 Modelo de Requisitos Moreq-Jus (Art. 14, II, f) 12 Análise Comparativa dos Custos das Soluções (Art. 14, III) 12 Escolha e Justificativa da Solução (Art. 14, IV) 15 Descrição da Solução (Art. 14, IV,a) 21 Alinhamento da Solução (Art. 14, IV, b) 22 Benefícios Esperados (Art. 14, IV, c) 22 Relação entre a Demanda Prevista e a Contratada (Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Agile Project Management Software Agile Project Management Buyer’S Guide
    A Publication From BUYER’S GUIDE AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BUYER’S GUIDE Executive Summary The software-centric business model is quickly becoming pervasive in every industry, not just IT. As Jeff Gothelf, co-author of Lean UX, put it, “Software is eating the world.”1 Since the publication of the Agile Manifesto in 2001, the project management (PM) climate has experienced a gradual shift away from the traditional “waterfall” process and toward a more adaptive, Agile model. In the wake of this paradigm shift, many business managers and developers have begun searching both for knowledge of Agile and for practical Agile tools—whether to better manage the software development lifecycle (SDLC) or other non-IT projects. This buyer’s guide will define the methodology of Agile PM as well as the product market and compare four leading Agile PM solutions. Table Of Contents 2 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 JIRA Agile 6 Axosoft 7 Planbox 8 Assembla 9 Comparable Products 10 How to Choose a Product 2 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BUYER’S GUIDE Introduction The rapid emergence of Agile software startups and corresponding business adoption has made the trend clear: people like Agile. Developers like it. Product owners like it. Customers don’t know it, but they like it, too, because they reap its benefits every day. A 2013 study by VersionOne stated that 76 percent of developers are using, or plan to use an Agile project management tool—a 9 percent increase from 2009.2 Agile actually isn’t a project management structure per se, although it is often referred to as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight MFR By
    Manufacturers, Publishers and Suppliers by Product Category 11/6/2017 10/100 Hubs & Switches ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS CIS SECURE COMPUTING INC DIGIUM GEAR HEAD 1 TRIPPLITE ASUS Cisco Press D‐LINK SYSTEMS GEFEN 1VISION SOFTWARE ATEN TECHNOLOGY CISCO SYSTEMS DUALCOMM TECHNOLOGY, INC. GEIST 3COM ATLAS SOUND CLEAR CUBE DYCONN GEOVISION INC. 4XEM CORP. ATLONA CLEARSOUNDS DYNEX PRODUCTS GIGAFAST 8E6 TECHNOLOGIES ATTO TECHNOLOGY CNET TECHNOLOGY EATON GIGAMON SYSTEMS LLC AAXEON TECHNOLOGIES LLC. AUDIOCODES, INC. CODE GREEN NETWORKS E‐CORPORATEGIFTS.COM, INC. GLOBAL MARKETING ACCELL AUDIOVOX CODI INC EDGECORE GOLDENRAM ACCELLION AVAYA COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS EDITSHARE LLC GREAT BAY SOFTWARE INC. ACER AMERICA AVENVIEW CORP COMMUNICATION DEVICES INC. EMC GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY ACTI CORPORATION AVOCENT COMNET ENDACE USA H3C Technology ADAPTEC AVOCENT‐EMERSON COMPELLENT ENGENIUS HALL RESEARCH ADC KENTROX AVTECH CORPORATION COMPREHENSIVE CABLE ENTERASYS NETWORKS HAVIS SHIELD ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS AXIOM MEMORY COMPU‐CALL, INC EPIPHAN SYSTEMS HAWKING TECHNOLOGY ADDERTECHNOLOGY AXIS COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER LAB EQUINOX SYSTEMS HERITAGE TRAVELWARE ADD‐ON COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AZIO CORPORATION COMPUTERLINKS ETHERNET DIRECT HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE ADDON STORE B & B ELECTRONICS COMTROL ETHERWAN HIKVISION DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO. LT ADESSO BELDEN CONNECTGEAR EVANS CONSOLES HITACHI ADTRAN BELKIN COMPONENTS CONNECTPRO EVGA.COM HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS ADVANTECH AUTOMATION CORP. BIDUL & CO CONSTANT TECHNOLOGIES INC Exablaze HOO TOO INC AEROHIVE NETWORKS BLACK BOX COOL GEAR EXACQ TECHNOLOGIES INC HP AJA VIDEO SYSTEMS BLACKMAGIC DESIGN USA CP TECHNOLOGIES EXFO INC HP INC ALCATEL BLADE NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES CPS EXTREME NETWORKS HUAWEI ALCATEL LUCENT BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES CREATIVE LABS EXTRON HUAWEI SYMANTEC TECHNOLOGIES ALLIED TELESIS BLUE COAT SYSTEMS CRESTRON ELECTRONICS F5 NETWORKS IBM ALLOY COMPUTER PRODUCTS LLC BOSCH SECURITY CTC UNION TECHNOLOGIES CO FELLOWES ICOMTECH INC ALTINEX, INC.
    [Show full text]