DOCSLIB.ORG

Anwar Sadat – Assassinated During the Annual Commemoration of Egypt Winning Back the Sinai During the Yom Kippur War in 1973

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anwar Sadat – Assassinated During the Annual Commemoration of Egypt Winning Back the Sinai During the Yom Kippur War in 1973 Anwar Sadat – assassinated during the annual commemoration of Egypt winning back the Sinai during the Yom Kippur war in 1973. Sadat was Gamal Abdul Nasser’s protégé. (Discuss Nasser and pan-Arabism). In 1979, Sadat and Menachem Begin won the Nobel peace prize for signing the Israeli/Egyptian peace treaty. Many Arabs and particularly Palestinians reviled this treaty because it ignored the fate of the Palestinian territories Israel occupied since June, 1967. Egypt was suspended from the Arab league for ten years. Members of the Egyptian Army were sympathetic to the Palestinian struggle and viewed the treaty as a capitulation to Israel. They decided to plot his murder. They were aligned with the Egyptian Islamic Jihad and led by a fatwa issued by Omar Abdul-Rahman, who was later convicted in the US for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. He was imprisoned in Egypt but never convicted. He was kicked out of Egypt and went to Afghanistan, where he made ties with Egyptian Ayman Zawahiri, and helped lay the groundwork for Al-Qaeda. Nasser and Sadat’s outlawing of the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates were outlawed, rounded up and imprisoned. This process was part of the fuel that fired the recruitment of Al- Qaeda fighters and sympathizers. The attack was planned and orchestrated by Khalid el Islambouli, a first Lieutenant in the Egyptian Army. This group was part of the original formation of what would become Al-Qaeda. Obviously, this group saw no room for negotiation with what they considered a Zionist presence in the Holy Land. Yitzhak Rabin – Prime Minister of Israel 1992-1995. Commander in Chief for the IDF during the 1967 war. A hard line Zionist with expansionist goals (in his 1979 memoirs, he even confessed to his role in forcing over 50,000 Palestinians from their homes by gunpoint in 1948). However, after the invasion of Lebanon and the first Intifada, global pressure was beginning to isolate Israel, especially in regards to the massive expansion of Jewish colonies in the West Bank (settlements). As Defense Minister, he presided over the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanon in 1986. This emboldened Hezbollah and allowed them to garner a massive political backing in Lebanon. By the early 90’s, Yasser Arafat and the PLO were weakened by the dissolving of the Soviet Union. Arafat was weak enough to finally “make peace.” The Oslo Accords were a disaster for the Palestinians and the consequences of the accords still devastate the possibility of a Palestinian state (the accords completely disregarded UN resolution 242). Arafat was also the victim of assassination in 2004, though by far less spectacular and public means (most likely by polonium poisoning). However, any attempt to make a settlement with the Palestinians (especially the condition that settlements would be dismantled and stopped from being built in the Occupied Territories) was met with fierce resistance by devoted Zionists and settlers in Israel and the Occupied Territories. The Oslo Accords created the Palestinian Authority (folding the PLO into this semi-governing body) which gave governing Palestinian factions a small amount of civil control over the Occupied Territories but left Israel as the primary governing force, where the IDF controlled all movement, trade, etc. and allowed Israel full access to the territories unconditionally. To make matters worse for Rabin, in 1994, he signed a peace treaty with King Hussein of Jordan, normalizing and opening trade relations between the two countries and settling disputes over water. However, like Egypt, this peace agreement would be a separate peace from the primary conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. That conflict remains to this very day. As Prime Minister, Rabin was followed by Shimon Peres and Binyamin Netanyahu; two leaders who did everything in their power to undermine the sovereignty of the PA and expand Israel’s territories through the colonial (settler) movement. All of these measures to help Israel’s status in the international community would come at a dear cost to Rabin. On November 4, he was killed by an extreme right wing Zionist named Yigal Amir. Rabin was killed after participating in a huge peace rally in Tel Aviv. Amir came from a Yemenite background (Mizrahi Jew) and was raised in an extremely orthodox household. He was primarily infuriated by the Oslo accords, and held Rabin responsible for the partial compromising of Eretz Yisrael. He acted with two accomplices, his brother, Hagai and a friend, Dror Adani. Benazir Bhutto – Bhutto came from a prestigious and politically entitled family (her father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was also a Prime Minister of Pakistan). She was Prime Minister twice, from 1988-1990 and 1993-1996. In 1988, she became the first female head of state in an Islamic nation. She was an uncompromising political figure, never pulling punches in her attitude towards political rivals. In 1996, she was ejected from her position after charges of corruption were leveled against her and her family. She left Pakistan in 1999 to Dubai and returned in 2007. She was assassinated a year later while campaigning in parliamentary elections against the party of Pervez Musharraf. She publicly admitted that her return to Pakistan posed a threat to her life and in October 2007, she survived an assassination attempt by suicide bombing that killed 138 other people. In December 2007, gunmen stormed her southern offices and killed three of her supporters. On December 27, 2007, Bhutto was leaving a campaign rally when she stood up through the sunroof of her bulletproof vehicle and was shot multiple times before a suicide bomber detonated explosives nearby that killed an additional 20 people. Al-Qaeda claimed responsibility for the attack. Bhutto’s family vehemently rejected this claim and pointed the finger at Musharraf. Musharraf was charged by a Pakistani anti-terrorism court with knowledge of the attack through the Pakistani Taliban. In April of 2013, Musharraf was ordered under house arrest for contributing to the murder of Bhutto. In May of 2013, Ali Chaudhry Zulfiqar, a special prosecutor in charge of investigating Bhutto’s murder was himself assassinated by gunmen as he drove to the courthouse. Bhutto’s killers have still not been definitively identified. Many assume there was cooperation between Pakistan’s ISI (Inter-Service Intelligence) and the Pakistani Taliban. But no other figures than Musharraf have been isolated and singled out. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Foreign Aid to the Palestinians
    U.S. Foreign Aid to the Palestinians Jim Zanotti Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs August 12, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22967 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress U.S. Foreign Aid to the Palestinians Summary Since the signing of the Oslo Accord in 1993 and the establishment of limited Palestinian self- rule in the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1994, the U.S. government has committed over $3.5 billion in bilateral assistance to the Palestinians. Since the death of Yasser Arafat in November 2004, U.S. assistance to the Palestinians has been averaging about $400 million a year. During the 1990s, U.S. foreign aid to the Palestinians averaged approximately $75 million per year. Despite more robust levels of assistance this decade, Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Hamas’s heightened role in Palestinian politics have made it more difficult to implement effective and lasting aid projects that serve U.S. interests. U.S. aid to the Palestinians has fluctuated considerably over the past five years, largely due to Hamas’s changing role within the Palestinian Authority (PA). After Hamas led the PA government for over a year, its forcible takeover of the Gaza Strip in June 2007 led to the creation of a non- Hamas government in the West Bank—resulting in different models of governance for the two Palestinian territories. Since then, the United States has dramatically boosted aid levels to bolster the PA in the West Bank and President Mahmoud Abbas vis-à-vis Hamas. The United States has appropriated or reprogrammed nearly $2 billion since 2007 in support of PA Prime Minister Salam Fayyad’s security, governance, development, and reform programs, including $650 million for direct budgetary assistance to the PA and nearly $400 million (toward training, non-lethal equipment, facilities, strategic planning, and administration) for strengthening and reforming PA security forces and criminal justice systems in the West Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabin's Assassination Twenty Years Later
    Rabin’s Assassination Twenty Years Later - Not Even Past BOOKS FILMS & MEDIA THE PUBLIC HISTORIAN BLOG TEXAS OUR/STORIES STUDENTS ABOUT 15 MINUTE HISTORY "The past is never dead. It's not even past." William Faulkner NOT EVEN PAST Tweet 87 Like THE PUBLIC HISTORIAN Rabin’s Assassination Twenty Years Later Making History: Houston’s “Spirit of the By Itay Eisinger Confederacy” “And I wish to add one more thing, if I can. The Prime Minister died a happy man.// Farewell to the dust of my Prime Minister, husband and father, and what’s rarely said: son of Rosa the Red.” (Dalia Ravikovitch, translated from the Hebrew by Chana Bloch and Chana Kronfeld) May 06, 2020 More from The Public Historian BOOKS America for Americans: A History of Xenophobia in the United States by Erika Lee (2019) Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, left, shaking hands with PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat, with U.S. President Bill Clinton in the center at the Oslo Accords signing ceremony, Sept. 13, 1993. (Vince Musi / The White House) April 20, 2020 On November 4 of 1995, the Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin– “the beautiful son of the Zionist utopia” — was assassinated by Yigal Amir, a 25 year old law student and Jewish zealot. The assassin wished to More Books thwart the peace process, led by Rabin, between Israel and the Palestinians. Twenty years after the assassination, the word “peace” seems to have evaporated from Israeli discourse as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promises his people will “forever live by the sword.” It is now crucial to reexamine DIGITAL HISTORY the murder and its effect on the course of history, on the Arab-Israeli conflict and particularly on Israeli society.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Growing Pains at 60
    Viewpoints Special Edition Israel: Growing Pains at 60 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org The maps on pages 96-103 are copyright The Foundation for Middle East Peace. Our thanks to the Foundation for graciously allowing the inclusion of the maps in this publication. Cover photo in the top row, middle is © Tom Spender/IRIN, as is the photo in the bottom row, extreme left.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Forces
    Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -3270 • Fax : 1 (202) 457 -8746 Email: [email protected] Palestinian Forces Palestinian Authority and Militant Forces Anthony H. Cordesman Center for Strategic and International Studies [email protected] Rough Working Draft: Revised February 9, 2006 Copyright, Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. May not be reproduced, referenced, quote d, or excerpted without the written permission of the author. Cordesman: Palestinian Forces 2/9/06 Page 2 ROUGH WORKING DRAFT: REVISED FEBRUARY 9, 2006 ................................ ................................ ............ 1 THE MILITARY FORCES OF PALESTINE ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 2 THE OSLO ACCORDS AND THE NEW ISRAELI -PALESTINIAN WAR ................................ ................................ .............. 3 THE DEATH OF ARAFAT AND THE VICTORY OF HAMAS : REDEFINING PALESTINIAN POLITICS AND THE ARAB - ISRAELI MILITARY BALANCE ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 4 THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY FORC ES ................................ ................................ .......... 5 Palestinian Authority Forces During the Peace Process ................................ ................................ ..................... 6 The
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Civil Suit to Punish/Deter Sponsors of Terrorism: Connecting Arafat & the PLO to the Terror Attacks in the Second In
    Digital Commons at St. Mary's University Faculty Articles School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2014 Using a Civil Suit to Punish/Deter Sponsors of Terrorism: Connecting Arafat & the PLO to the Terror Attacks in the Second Intifada Jeffrey F. Addicott St. Mary's University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.stmarytx.edu/facarticles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey F. Addicott, Using a Civil Suit to Punish/Deter Sponsors of Terrorism: Connecting Arafat & the PLO to the Terror Attacks in the Second Intifada, 4 St. John’s J. Int’l & Comp. L. 71 (2014). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at St. Mary's University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. USING A CIVIL SUIT TO PUNISH/DETER SPONSORS OF TERRORISM: CONNECTING ARAFAT & THE PLO TO THE TERROR ATTACKS IN THE SECOND INTIFADA Dr. Jeffery Addicott* INTRODUCTION “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”1 -Edmund Burke As the so-called “War on Terror” 2 continues, it is imperative that civilized nations employ every possible avenue under the rule of law to punish and deter those governments and States that choose to engage in or provide support to terrorism.3 *∗Professor of Law and Director, Center for Terrorism Law, St. Mary’s University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLO and the PALESTINIAN ARMED STRUGGLE by Professor Yezid Sayigh, Department of War Studies, King's College London
    THE PLO AND THE PALESTINIAN ARMED STRUGGLE by Professor Yezid Sayigh, Department of War Studies, King's College London The emergence of a durable Palestinian nationalism was one of the more remarkable developments in the history of the modern Middle East in the second half of the 20th century. This was largely due to a generation of young activists who proved particularly adept at capturing the public imagination, and at seizing opportunities to develop autonomous political institutions and to promote their cause regionally and internationally. Their principal vehicle was the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), while armed struggle, both as practice and as doctrine, was their primary means of mobilizing their constituency and asserting a distinct national identity. By the end of the 1970s a majority of countries – starting with Arab countries, then extending through the Third World and the Soviet bloc and other socialist countries, and ending with a growing number of West European countries – had recognized the PLO as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. The United Nations General Assembly meanwhile confirmed the right of the stateless Palestinians to national self- determination, a position adopted subsequently by the European Union and eventually echoed, in the form of support for Palestinian statehood, by the United States and Israel from 2001 onwards. None of this was a foregone conclusion, however. Britain had promised to establish a Jewish ‘national home’ in Palestine when it seized the country from the Ottoman Empire in 1917, without making a similar commitment to the indigenous Palestinian Arab inhabitants. In 1929 it offered them the opportunity to establish a self-governing agency and to participate in an elected assembly, but their community leaders refused the offer because it was conditional on accepting continued British rule and the establishment of the Jewish ‘national home’ in what they considered their own homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Nephi 1–7 “I Will Go and Do”
    JANUARY 6-12, 2020 1 Nephi 1–7 “I Will Go and Do” Summary: Nephi begins the record of his people—Lehi sees in vision a pillar of fire and reads from a book of prophecy—He praises God, foretells the coming of the Messiah, and prophesies the destruction of Jerusalem—He is persecuted by the Jews. About 600 B.C. Lehi takes his family into the wilderness by the Red Sea—They leave their property—Lehi offers a sacrifice to the Lord and teaches his sons to keep the commandments—Laman and Lemuel murmur against their father—Nephi is obedient and prays in faith; the Lord speaks to him, and he is chosen to rule over his brethren. About 600 B.C. Lehi’s sons return to Jerusalem to obtain the plates of brass—Laban refuses to give the plates up—Nephi exhorts and encourages his brethren—Laban steals their property and attempts to slay them—Laman and Lemuel smite Nephi and Sam and are reproved by an angel. About 600–592 B.C. Nephi slays Laban at the Lord’s command and then secures the plates of brass by stratagem—Zoram chooses to join Lehi’s family in the wilderness. About 600–592 B.C. Sariah complains against Lehi—Both rejoice over the return of their sons—They offer sacrifices—The plates of brass contain writings of Moses and the prophets—The plates identify Lehi as a descendant of Joseph—Lehi prophesies concerning his seed and the preservation of the plates. About 600–592 B.C. Nephi writes of the things of God—Nephi’s purpose is to persuade men to come unto the God of Abraham and be saved.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S12138
    S12138 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE September 29, 2003 slaughter of non-ambulatory livestock, 1622, a bill to amend title 10, United Incredibly, while asking the Congress and for other purposes. States Code, to exempt certain mem- for an additional $87 billion for the war S. 1531 bers of the Armed Forces from the re- in Iraq, the Department of Defense At the request of Mr. HATCH, the quirement to pay subsistence charges wants to drop soldiers on leave off at names of the Senator from Kansas (Mr. while hospitalized. the Baltimore Airport and then make ROBERTS), the Senator from Hawaii S. 1630 them pay for their transportation (Mr. INOUYE) and the Senator from Ar- At the request of Mrs. DOLE, the home and back. Those service men and kansas (Mr. PRYOR) were added as co- name of the Senator from Minnesota women are serving with great courage sponsors of S. 1531, a bill to require the (Mr. COLEMAN) was added as a cospon- in 115-degree temperatures and other Secretary of the Treasury to mint sor of S. 1630, a bill to facilitate nation- truly awful conditions. They are being coins in commemoration of Chief Jus- wide availability of 2–1–1 telephone given 2 weeks leave—many of them— tice John Marshall. service for information and referral because they are in the Reserves or Na- tional Guard and they have just had S. 1545 services, and for other purposes. their 5- or 6-month tour extended by At the request of Mr. HATCH, the S. 1637 another 6 months. This will be the only names of the Senator from Iowa (Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Yitzhak Rabin
    YITZHAK RABIN: CHRONICLE OF AN ASSASSINATION FORETOLD Last year, architect-turned-filmmaker Amos Gitaï directed Rabin, the Last EN Day, an investigation into the assassination, on November 4, 1995, of the / Israeli Prime Minister, after a demonstration for peace and against violence in Tel-Aviv. The assassination cast a cold and brutal light on a dark and terrifying world—a world that made murder possible, as it suddenly became apparent to a traumatised public. For the Cour d’honneur of the Palais des papes, using the memories of Leah Rabin, the Prime Minister’s widow, as a springboard, Amos GitaI has created a “fable” devoid of formality and carried by an exceptional cast. Seven voices brought together to create a recitative, “halfway between lament and lullaby,” to travel back through History and explore the incredible violence with which the nationalist forces fought the peace project, tearing Israel apart. Seven voices caught “like in an echo chamber,” between image-documents and excerpts from classic and contemporary literature— that bank of memory that has always informed the filmmaker’s understanding of the world. For us, who let the events of this historic story travel through our minds, reality appears as a juxtaposition of fragments carved into our collective memory. AMOS GITAI In 1973, when the Yom Kippur War breaks out, Amos Gitai is an architecture student. The helicopter that carries him and his unit of emergency medics is shot down by a missile, an episode he will allude to years later in Kippur (2000). After the war, he starts directing short films for the Israeli public television, which has now gone out of business.
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Human Rights Report: Israel and the Occupied Territories Page 1 of 4
    1996 Human Rights Report: Israel and the Occupied Territories Page 1 of 4 The State Department web site below is a permanent electro information released prior to January 20, 2001. Please see w material released since President George W. Bush took offic This site is not updated so external links may no longer func us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be co endorsement of the views contained therein. U.S. Department of State Israel and the Occupied Territories Report on Human Rights Practices for 1996 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, January 30, 1997. ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES* Israel is a parliamentary democracy with a multiparty system and free elections. There is no constitution; a series of "basic laws" provide for fundamental rights. The legislature, or Knesset, has the power to dissolve the Government and limit the authority of the executive branch. On May 29, Likud Party leader Benyamin Netanyahu was elected Prime Minister; he heads a center-right coalition government. The judiciary is independent. Since its founding in 1948, Israel has been in a state of war with most of its Arab neighbors. It concluded a peace treaty with Egypt in 1979 and with Jordan in 1994. As a result of the 1967 War, occupied the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights. The international community does not recognize Israel's sovereignty over any part of the occupied territories. Throughout its existence, Israel has experienced numerous terrorist attacks. It relies heavily on its military and security services and retains many security-related regulations from the period of the British Mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Stop Coddling Soviet "Peacemakers" | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds Stop Coddling Soviet "Peacemakers" by John Hannah May 24, 1988 ABOUT THE AUTHORS John Hannah John Hannah is a senior fellow at The Washington Institute. Articles & Testimony s the Moscow summit approaches, and as the prospects for his Arab- Israeli peace initiative grow A increasingly dim, the time has come for Secretary of State George Shultz to seize the diplomatic high road and publicly challenge the Soviet Union to put up or shut up on the question of Middle East peace. For nearly three months, Shultz has used quiet diplomacy in an attempt to persuade Moscow to sign on to his peace proposal. From the plan's inception, with its controversial provision for Soviet participation in an international conference, Shultz has sought to take Moscow's interests into account. Indeed, he has gone out of his way to consult the Soviets and engage them in a cooperative effort to get Mideast negotiations started. In reply, Moscow has consistently rebuked the secretary. While not rejecting the Shultz plan outright, the Soviets have publicly targeted it for repeated criticism, on various occasions deriding it as unbalanced, devious and even "anti-Arab." Specifically, Soviet media have dismissed Shultz's idea for an international conference that only serves as an opening to direct negotiations between Israel and a joint Jordanian-Palestinian delegation. Toeing the Arab line, Moscow insists on PLO participation as an independent delegation in an "authoritative" conference that is empowered to make binding decisions. Confronted with such clear Soviet opposition, Shultz has had to acknowledge that sharp differences do exist between the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bildner Event Reviews the Legacy of Yitzhak Rabin
    Bildner event reviews the legacy of Yitzhak Rabin Jacob Kamaras THE JEWISH STATE November 27, 2009 Rather than focusing on how a chasm in Israeli politics resulted in former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin's assassination, the work of Dr. Vered Vinitzky-Seroussi shows a divided Israeli society through the ways Rabin was memorialized. Vinitzky-Seroussi, who works in the Sociology and Anthropology departments at Hebrew University of Jerusalem but is researching collective memory at Yale University this year, spoke at Rutgers University's Douglass Campus Center Nov. 18 on the radically different ways in which the cities of Jerusalem and Tel-Aviv commemorated Rabin after he was shot in Tel-Aviv by Yigal Amir, a Jewish-Israeli opponent of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, on Nov. 4, 1995. The program was the Ruth and Alvin Rockoff Annual Lecture of The Allen and Joan Bildner Center for the Study of Jewish Life. Vinitzky-Seroussi recently came out with a book titled "Yitzhak Rabin's Assassination and the Dilemmas of Commemoration." With Jerusalem containing a politically right-wing and religious population compared with Tel- Aviv's left-wing and cosmopolitan orientation, the cities already represented a bifurcation of Israeli society -- but Tel-Aviv's commitment to remembering Rabin, and Jerusalem's scant effort to that end because of Rabin's left-wing politics, accentuated those social differences and gave Tel-Aviv a newfound legitimacy as an alternative capital of Israel, Vinitzky-Seroussi argued. "The two cities can be said to define two distinct Israeli national identities," Vinitzky-Seroussi said to an audience of about 75 people.
    [Show full text]