Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2005 a Decade After the Assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin Asher Arian, Shlomit Barnea

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2005 a Decade After the Assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin Asher Arian, Shlomit Barnea Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2005 A Decade after the Assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin Asher Arian, Shlomit Barnea, Pazit Ben-Nun, Raphael Ventura, Michal Shamir The Israel Democracy Institute is an independent body that assists the Knesset and its committees, government offices and institutions, local government bodies, and political parties, through studies and proposals designed to bring about changes and reforms in their manner of operation. In addition, the Israel Democracy Institute fulfills its public charge through the presentation of comparative information on legislative topics and the various ways in which democratic regimes function. It also strives to enrich public discourse and encourage new ways of thinking through the initiation of discussion on topics of current political, social and economic interest, both by bringing together legislators, administrators and academics and through the publication of research findings. The Guttman Center was established at The Israel Democracy Institute in 1998 with the transfer of The Guttman Institute for Applied Social Research to the IDI. Formed in 1949 by Professor Louis Guttman, The Guttman Institute was the pioneer of public opinion research and advances in social science methodology in Israel. The goal of The Guttman Center is to enrich research projects at the IDI and discussions of public policy with data-based information and analyses. Editor-in-Chief Uri Dromi Publishing Director Edna Granit Library Editor Yael Mosheiff Content and Hebrew Language Editor Carmit Gai Linguistic Editor (Hebrew) Ronit Tapiero Translator Batya Stein English Editor Asher Weill Copy Editor Naomi Shmueli Production Coordinator Nadav Shtechman Design Ron Haran Printed in Jerusalem, by Art Plus, Ltd. No portion of this book may be reproduced, copied, photographed, recorded, translated, stored in a data base, broadcast or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, optic, mechanical or otherwise. Commercial use in any form of the material contained in this book without the express permission in writing of the publisher is strictly forbidden. © The Israel Democracy Institute, Jerusalem, 2005 ISBN 965-519-018-8 Asher Arian is scientific director of the Guttman Center at The Israel Democracy Institute and a professor of political science at the University of Haifa. He is Distinguished Professor at the PhD Program in Political Science at the City University of New York Graduate Center. Shlomit Barnea and Pazit Ben-Nun are researchers at The Israel Democracy Institute. Raphael Ventura, PhD in Political Science, is Head of the Archive Unit, Guttman Center, The Israel Democracy Institute. Michal Shamir is a professor of political science at Tel Aviv University and is the incumbent of The Alvin Z. Rubinstein Chair in Political Science. Our books may be ordered from: The Israel Democracy Institute, P.O. Box 4482, Jerusalem 91044 Tel: 02-5392888, 1-800-202222; Fax: 03-5488640 Website: www.idi.org.ilwww.idi.org.il Contents List of Figures and Tables 17 Acknowledgements 10 Preface – Prof. Arye Carmon 11 Summary of the Israeli Democracy Index, 2005 13 Part One – Updating the Democracy Index, 2005 A. Description of the Research and its Goals 19 B. The Democracy Indicators 23 1. A Summary Outline 23 2. Israel 2005 as Reflected in the Indicators: Changes since the 2004 Index 25 3. Selected Findings from the Index 29 C. The Democracy Survey 45 1. A Summary Outline 45 2. Democracy’s Implementation in Israel According to the Three Aspects: The Perception of the Israeli Public, 2005 46 3. Democracy’s Implementation in Israel According to the Three Aspects: A Comparison between 2003 and 2005 48 4. Democracy’s Implementation in Israel According to Various Population Groups 49 5. Democratic Attitudes among the Israeli Public, 2005 According to the Three Aspects 51 6. Democratic Attitudes among the Israeli Public: A Comparison between 2003 and 2005 54 7. Democratic Attitudes According to Various Population Groups 55 8. The Public’s Degree of Trust in Key Institutions in Israel, 2003-2005 56 9. The Most Important Problem the Government Must Deal With: The Public View 58 Part Two – On the Tenth Anniversary of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin’s Assassination A. Background 63 B. Yitzhak Rabin as Reflected in Israeli Public Opinion, 2005 65 1. Yitzhak Rabin in the Collective Memory 65 2. The Question of Blame: Explanations and Reasons for the Assassination 71 3. The Public Perception of the Sentence Imposed on Yigal Amir 176 4. The Influence of the Assassination on the Israeli Public, on Israeli Society, and on Israeli Democracy 179 5. Drawing Lessons from the Assassination 184 C. Did Rabin’s Assassination Influence Democratic Culture in Israel? 191 1. Rabin’s Assassination and Value Priorities 192 2. Political Tolerance 198 3. The Legitimacy of Protest 102 4. Summary 109 D. Identity within the Bounds of Controversy: Identity Types in the Jewish Public Ten Years after Rabin’s Assassination 113 1. The Dimensions of the Identity 113 2. Types of Identity 114 3. Types of Identity and Religiosity 117 4. Identity Types, Right-Left and Political Preferences 117 5. The External and Internal Identity Dimensions 122 6. The Public’s Attitude to Yitzhak Rabin 123 E. A Review of Recent Studies on the Assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and its Influence on Israeli Society and Democracy 127 1. The Causes of the Assassination 127 2. Public Feelings and Reactions after the Assassination 128 3. Rabin’s Image in the Collective Memory 130 4. The Assassination’s Influence and its Implications for Israeli Society and Democracy 133 Appendices 137 Appendix A: The Democracy Index 2005 Compared to 2004 137 Appendix B: The Democracy Index February 2005 Compared to the Democracy Indices 2003 and 2004 139 Appendix C: Frequencies for the Rabin Survey, July 2005 145 Description of the Research and its Goals 7 List of Figures and Tables Figure 1 The Structure of the Index 20 Figure 2 Israel’s Ranking in the Democracies’ Sample According to 13 Criteria 24 Figure 3 Representativeness: An International Comparison (Party Dominance Measure) 31 Figure 4 Representativeness in Israel, 1990-2003 (Party Dominance Measure) 32 Figure 5 Integrity: An International Comparison 33 Figure 6 Integrity in Israel as Reflected in Two Political Corruption Ratings, 1997-2005 35 Figure 7 Law and Order: An International Comparison 35 Figure 8 Political Discrimination of Minorities: An International Comparison 37 Figure 9 Economic Discrimination of Minorities: An International Comparison 37 Figure 10 Economic, Political, and Cultural Discrimination of the Arab Minority in Israel, 1990-2003 38 Figure 11 Political Conflict: An International Comparison 39 Figure 12 Political Conflict in Israel, 1990-2003 41 Figure 13 Religious Tensions: An International Comparison 42 Figure 14 National/Ethnic/Linguistic Tensions: An International Comparison 42 Figure 15 Israel as Reflected in Two Tension Ratings, 1992-2005 43 Figure 16 Assessing Democracy’s Implementation in the Israeli Public in 2005 47 Figure 17 Assessing Democracy’s Implementation in the Israeli Public in 2003 and 2005 48 Figure 18 Assessing Democracy’s Implementation in the Institutional Aspect: Jewish “Old Timers,” Immigrants from the CIS, and Arabs 50 Figure 19 Assessing Democracy’s Implementation in the Rights Aspect: Jewish “Old Timers,” Immigrants from the CIS, and Arabs 51 Figure 20 Democratic Attitudes: Israeli Public, 2005 52 Figure 21 Democratic Attitudes: Israeli Public, 2003 and 2005 53 Figure 22 Opposition to a “Population Transfer” over Time 54 Figure 23 Democratic Attitudes in the Rights Aspect: Jewish “Old Timers,” Immigrants from the CIS, and Arabs 55 Figure 24 Democratic Attitudes in the Stability Aspect: Jewish “Old Timers,” Immigrants from the CIS, and Arabs 57 Figure 25 Trust in Key Institutions over the Last Three Years 57 Figure 26 Average Liking Rates for Various Israeli Leaders among the Jewish Public, 1984-2005 66 8 Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2005 Figure 27 Qualities the Jewish Public Ascribe to Yitzhak Rabin, 2005, According to Degree of Religiosity 68 Figure 28 Qualities the Jewish Public Ascribe to Yitzhak Rabin, 2005, According to Political Leanings 69 Figure 29 Agreement with Statements on Peace and Security Ascribed or Not Ascribed to Yitzhak Rabin 70 Figure 30 Attitudes toward Yigal Amir’s Sentence, According to Various Groups in Israeli Society 77 Figure 31 The Influence of Rabin’s Assassination on the Attitude of the Jewish Public to Religious Jews and to the Settlers in the Occupied Territories 81 Figure 32 The Perceptions of Rabin’s Assassination as a Crucially Significant Event in the History of Israel, According to Groups in Society 82 Figure 33 Assessing the Influence of Rabin’s Assassination on the Prospects for Peace, Democracy, and Political Polarization of Jews 83 Figure 34 Assessing the Lessons Drawn from the Assassination by the Security Forces and the Public, According to Nationality and Degree of Religiosity 86 Figure 35 Assessing the Authorities’ Behavior toward Campaigners for Political Violence Concerning the Disengagement, According to Groups in Society 87 Figure 36 Ranking Values: Percentage Ranking First a Jewish Majority, the Greater Land of Israel, Peace, and Democracy, 1988-2005 94 Figure 37 Ranking Values: Percentage Ranking Democracy First until and after the Outbreak of the Intifada, 1988-2005 95 Figure 38 Political Tolerance of a Least-Liked Group, 1980-2005 103 Figure 39 Political Tolerance of Israeli Arab Citizens, 1980-2005 104 Figure 40 Political
Recommended publications
  • Teaching Plato in Palestine: Philosophy in a Divided World
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. 1 TEACHING PLATO IN PALESTINE Can philosophy save the Middle East? It can. This, at least, is the thesis of Sari Nusseibeh as I learn from a friend upon arriving in Israel in February 2006. Nusseibeh is not only a prominent Palestinian intellectual and the Palestinian Liberation Organization’s former chief repre- sentative in Jerusalem, but also a philosopher by training (and, I think, by nature, too). “Only philosophy,” the friend tells me he argued during the Shlomo Pines memorial lec- ture in West Jerusalem three years before (aptly titled “On the Relevance of Philosophy in the Arab World Today”). By the time I leave Israel, I’m convinced that he’s on to something. I am here to teach a seminar at Al-Quds University, the Palestinian university in Jerusalem, together with Nus- seibeh, who has been president of Al- Quds since 1995. My idea is to discuss Plato’s political thought with the students and then examine how medieval Muslim and Jewish philosophers built on this thought to interpret Islam and Judaism as philosophical religions. I hope to raise some basic questions about philosophy and its rela- For general queries, contact [email protected] Fraenkel.indb 3 2/17/2015 8:56:12 AM © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabin's Assassination Twenty Years Later
    Rabin’s Assassination Twenty Years Later - Not Even Past BOOKS FILMS & MEDIA THE PUBLIC HISTORIAN BLOG TEXAS OUR/STORIES STUDENTS ABOUT 15 MINUTE HISTORY "The past is never dead. It's not even past." William Faulkner NOT EVEN PAST Tweet 87 Like THE PUBLIC HISTORIAN Rabin’s Assassination Twenty Years Later Making History: Houston’s “Spirit of the By Itay Eisinger Confederacy” “And I wish to add one more thing, if I can. The Prime Minister died a happy man.// Farewell to the dust of my Prime Minister, husband and father, and what’s rarely said: son of Rosa the Red.” (Dalia Ravikovitch, translated from the Hebrew by Chana Bloch and Chana Kronfeld) May 06, 2020 More from The Public Historian BOOKS America for Americans: A History of Xenophobia in the United States by Erika Lee (2019) Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, left, shaking hands with PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat, with U.S. President Bill Clinton in the center at the Oslo Accords signing ceremony, Sept. 13, 1993. (Vince Musi / The White House) April 20, 2020 On November 4 of 1995, the Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin– “the beautiful son of the Zionist utopia” — was assassinated by Yigal Amir, a 25 year old law student and Jewish zealot. The assassin wished to More Books thwart the peace process, led by Rabin, between Israel and the Palestinians. Twenty years after the assassination, the word “peace” seems to have evaporated from Israeli discourse as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promises his people will “forever live by the sword.” It is now crucial to reexamine DIGITAL HISTORY the murder and its effect on the course of history, on the Arab-Israeli conflict and particularly on Israeli society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prevention of Unjust Wars
    The Prevention of Unjust Wars 1 The Doctrine of the Permissibility of Participation War is a great moral evil. … The first great moral challenge of war, then, is: prevention. For most possible wars the best response is prevention. Occasionally, a war may be the least available evil among a bad lot of choices. Since war always involves the commission of so much wrongful killing and injuring, making war itself a supreme evil, a particular war can be the least available evil only if it prevents, or anyhow is likely to prevent, an alternative evil that is very great indeed.1 This passage from a recent paper by Henry Shue and Janina Dill articulates a view of war that is hard to challenge, even for those who are antipathetic to pacifism. It is echoed in the succinct claim of Michael Walzer and Avishai Margalit that “the point of just war theory is to regulate warfare, to limit its occasions.”2 These are, I take it, claims about war understood as a phenomenon comprising the belligerent acts of all the parties to a conflict. The Second World War was a war in this sense, one that was clearly a great evil, though if the only alternative to its occurrence was the unopposed conquest of Europe by the Nazis, it was an evil that Shue and Dill would presumably concede to have been the “least available evil” in the circumstances. Notice, however, that the Second World War was neither a just war nor an unjust war; rather, it comprised both just and unjust wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Conflicts Report - Israel
    Armed Conflicts Report - Israel Armed Conflicts Report Israel-Palestine (1948 - first combat deaths) Update: February 2009 Summary Type of Conflict Parties to the Conflict Status of the Fighting Number of Deaths Political Developments Background Arms Sources Economic Factors Summary: 2008 The situation in the Gaza strip escalated throughout 2008 to reflect an increasing humanitarian crisis. The death toll reached approximately 1800 deaths by the end of January 2009, with increased conflict taking place after December 19th. The first six months of 2008 saw increased fighting between Israeli forces and Hamas rebels. A six month ceasefire was agreed upon in June of 2008, and the summer months saw increased factional violence between opposing Palestinian groups Hamas and Fatah. Israel shut down the border crossings between the Gaza strip and Israel and shut off fuel to the power plant mid-January 2008. The fuel was eventually turned on although blackouts occurred sporadically throughout the year. The blockade was opened periodically throughout the year to allow a minimum amount of humanitarian aid to pass through. However, for the majority of the year, the 1.5 million Gaza Strip inhabitants, including those needing medical aid, were trapped with few resources. At the end of January 2009, Israel agreed to the principles of a ceasefire proposal, but it is unknown whether or not both sides can come to agreeable terms and create long lasting peace in 2009. 2007 A November 2006 ceasefire was broken when opposing Palestinian groups Hamas and Fatah renewed fighting in April and May of 2007. In June, Hamas led a coup on the Gaza headquarters of Fatah giving them control of the Gaza Strip.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Growing Pains at 60
    Viewpoints Special Edition Israel: Growing Pains at 60 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org The maps on pages 96-103 are copyright The Foundation for Middle East Peace. Our thanks to the Foundation for graciously allowing the inclusion of the maps in this publication. Cover photo in the top row, middle is © Tom Spender/IRIN, as is the photo in the bottom row, extreme left.
    [Show full text]
  • Republication, Copying Or Redistribution by Any Means Is
    Republication, copying or redistribution by any means is expressly prohibited without the prior written permission of The Economist The Economist April 5th 2008 A special report on Israel 1 The next generation Also in this section Fenced in Short-term safety is not providing long-term security, and sometimes works against it. Page 4 To ght, perchance to die Policing the Palestinians has eroded the soul of Israel’s people’s army. Page 6 Miracles and mirages A strong economy built on weak fundamentals. Page 7 A house of many mansions Israeli Jews are becoming more disparate but also somewhat more tolerant of each other. Page 9 Israel at 60 is as prosperous and secure as it has ever been, but its Hanging on future looks increasingly uncertain, says Gideon Licheld. Can it The settlers are regrouping from their defeat resolve its problems in time? in Gaza. Page 11 HREE years ago, in a slim volume enti- abroad, for Israel to become a fully demo- Ttled Epistle to an Israeli Jewish-Zionist cratic, non-Zionist state and grant some How the other fth lives Leader, Yehezkel Dror, a veteran Israeli form of autonomy to Arab-Israelis. The Arab-Israelis are increasingly treated as the political scientist, set out two contrasting best and brightest have emigrated, leaving enemy within. Page 12 visions of how his country might look in a waning economy. Government coali- the year 2040. tions are fractious and short-lived. The dif- In the rst, it has some 50% more peo- ferent population groups are ghettoised; A systemic problem ple, is home to two-thirds of the world’s wealth gaps yawn.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Nephi 1–7 “I Will Go and Do”
    JANUARY 6-12, 2020 1 Nephi 1–7 “I Will Go and Do” Summary: Nephi begins the record of his people—Lehi sees in vision a pillar of fire and reads from a book of prophecy—He praises God, foretells the coming of the Messiah, and prophesies the destruction of Jerusalem—He is persecuted by the Jews. About 600 B.C. Lehi takes his family into the wilderness by the Red Sea—They leave their property—Lehi offers a sacrifice to the Lord and teaches his sons to keep the commandments—Laman and Lemuel murmur against their father—Nephi is obedient and prays in faith; the Lord speaks to him, and he is chosen to rule over his brethren. About 600 B.C. Lehi’s sons return to Jerusalem to obtain the plates of brass—Laban refuses to give the plates up—Nephi exhorts and encourages his brethren—Laban steals their property and attempts to slay them—Laman and Lemuel smite Nephi and Sam and are reproved by an angel. About 600–592 B.C. Nephi slays Laban at the Lord’s command and then secures the plates of brass by stratagem—Zoram chooses to join Lehi’s family in the wilderness. About 600–592 B.C. Sariah complains against Lehi—Both rejoice over the return of their sons—They offer sacrifices—The plates of brass contain writings of Moses and the prophets—The plates identify Lehi as a descendant of Joseph—Lehi prophesies concerning his seed and the preservation of the plates. About 600–592 B.C. Nephi writes of the things of God—Nephi’s purpose is to persuade men to come unto the God of Abraham and be saved.
    [Show full text]
  • Yitzhak Rabin
    YITZHAK RABIN: CHRONICLE OF AN ASSASSINATION FORETOLD Last year, architect-turned-filmmaker Amos Gitaï directed Rabin, the Last EN Day, an investigation into the assassination, on November 4, 1995, of the / Israeli Prime Minister, after a demonstration for peace and against violence in Tel-Aviv. The assassination cast a cold and brutal light on a dark and terrifying world—a world that made murder possible, as it suddenly became apparent to a traumatised public. For the Cour d’honneur of the Palais des papes, using the memories of Leah Rabin, the Prime Minister’s widow, as a springboard, Amos GitaI has created a “fable” devoid of formality and carried by an exceptional cast. Seven voices brought together to create a recitative, “halfway between lament and lullaby,” to travel back through History and explore the incredible violence with which the nationalist forces fought the peace project, tearing Israel apart. Seven voices caught “like in an echo chamber,” between image-documents and excerpts from classic and contemporary literature— that bank of memory that has always informed the filmmaker’s understanding of the world. For us, who let the events of this historic story travel through our minds, reality appears as a juxtaposition of fragments carved into our collective memory. AMOS GITAI In 1973, when the Yom Kippur War breaks out, Amos Gitai is an architecture student. The helicopter that carries him and his unit of emergency medics is shot down by a missile, an episode he will allude to years later in Kippur (2000). After the war, he starts directing short films for the Israeli public television, which has now gone out of business.
    [Show full text]
  • Schlaglicht Israel Nr
    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 10/11 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 16. – 30. Mai 2011 1. Obamas Nahost-Rede dangerous unintended consequences. […] For Ob- ama, the 'Arab Spring' recalls […] the fall of the Ber- Am 19. Mai hielt US-Präsident Barack Obama im lin Wall in 1989 and the Eastern European transition State Department eine Grundsatzrede zum Nahen to democracy. Osten und dem "arabischen Frühling." Darin sprach Unfortunately, […] in the Middle East of 2011, al- er sich für die Volksaufstände der letzten Monate though many demonstrators are driven by the de- aus und versprach "potentiellen Demokratien" wie mand for reform, they lack the deep ideological and Ägypten und Tunesien seine Unterstützung. civil society institutional foundations that under- Obama widmete nur einen kleinen Teil seiner Rede girded success in 1989. […] Islamism represents the dem palästinensisch-israelischen Konflikt. Verständ- most popular alternative ideology to the status quo, licherweise erhielt dieser Teil jedoch die größte Me- and the Islamists are inestimably better organized dienaufmerksamkeit in Israel. Für Kontroverse sorg- than the democratic reformers." te insbesondere sein Aufruf, einen palästinensi- Jonathan Rynhold, JPO 25.05.11 schen Staat auf Basis der Waffenstillstandslinien von 1967 zu gründen – bisher hatten die USA immer Che Obama betont, bei der Grenzziehung müsse Israels Sicher- "Obama […] believes in the strength and ability of heit im Vordergrund stehen. the masses to impose change on leaders. […] The Premierminister Benjamin Netanyahu bezeichnete role of the United States is to serve as a model to die Grenzen von 1967 in einer öffentlichen Reaktion them, to encourage them and to support democratic auf die Rede dementsprechend umgehend als "nicht movements replacing despotic tyranny, but the re- zu verteidigen".
    [Show full text]
  • The Saban Forum 2005
    The Saban Forum 2005 A U.S.–Israel Dialogue Dealing with 21st Century Challenges Jerusalem, Israel November 11–13, 2005 The Saban Forum 2005 A U.S.–Israel Dialogue Dealing with 21st Century Challenges Jerusalem, Israel November 11–13, 2005 Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies Tel Aviv University Speakers and Chairmen Shai Agassi Shimon Peres Stephen Breyer Itamar Rabinovich David Brooks Aviezer Ravitzky William J. Clinton Condoleezza Rice Hillary Rodham Clinton Haim Saban Avi Dicter Ariel Sharon Thomas L. Friedman Zvi Shtauber David Ignatius Strobe Talbott Moshe Katsav Yossi Vardi Tzipi Livni Margaret Warner Shaul Mofaz James Wolfensohn Letter from the Chairman . 5 List of Participants . 6 Executive Summary . 9 Program Schedule . 19 Proceedings . 23 Katsav Keynote Address . 37 Clinton Keynote Address . 43 Sharon Keynote Address . 73 Rice Keynote Address . 83 Participant Biographies . 89 About the Saban Center . 105 About the Jaffee Center . 106 The ongoing tumult in the Middle East makes continued dialogue between the allied democracies of the United States and Israel all the more necessary and relevant. A Letter from the Chairman In November 2005, we held the second annual Saban Forum in Jerusalem. We had inaugurated the Saban Forum in Washington DC in December 2004 to provide a structured, institutional- ized annual dialogue between the United States and Israel. Each time we have gathered the high- est-level political and policy leaders, opinion formers and intellectuals to define and debate the issues that confront two of the world’s most vibrant democracies: the United States and Israel. The timing of the 2005 Forum could not have been more propitious or tragic.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanism: the Road from Athens to Jerusalem by DONNALYNN HESS
    Humanism: The Road From Athens to Jerusalem BY DONNALYNN HESS Over the past 30 years numerous Christian leaders have legitimately decried particular evils spawned by secular humanism; few, however, have provided a thoughtful analysis of how this philosophic system has been interwoven into God’s eternal plan. Viewing humanism in the context of sovereignty reveals that this recurring movement is not only a vivid record of fallen man’s impotence but also a divine roadmap that can be used to lead men to the cross. It is, therefore, valuable to reflect upon the significance of the historic signposts God has given. Such reflection can awaken a profound awe of God’s wisdom and compassion; it can also help believers discern (like Paul) how to guide “Athenians” from Mars Hill to Jerusalem. In the preface to Humanist Manifestos I and II (1973), Kurtz noted that “Humanism is a philosophical, religious, and moral point of view as old as human civilization itself” (p. 3). Although the thread of humanism does indeed run throughout the development of civilizations, there are specific reference points that are particularly helpful in discerning its impact on the western world. These reference points include the Greco-Roman period, the Renaissance, and the dawn of the modern age (20th century). Classical Humanism: A Precursor to the Incarnation The most important of the three epochs is the Greco-Roman period, for during this era the key tenets of humanism were formed. To fully understand the movement’s origin we must begin not with Socrates but with Thales, the pre-Socratic philosopher born in Miletos around 640 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Human Rights Report: Israel and the Occupied Territories Page 1 of 4
    1996 Human Rights Report: Israel and the Occupied Territories Page 1 of 4 The State Department web site below is a permanent electro information released prior to January 20, 2001. Please see w material released since President George W. Bush took offic This site is not updated so external links may no longer func us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be co endorsement of the views contained therein. U.S. Department of State Israel and the Occupied Territories Report on Human Rights Practices for 1996 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, January 30, 1997. ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES* Israel is a parliamentary democracy with a multiparty system and free elections. There is no constitution; a series of "basic laws" provide for fundamental rights. The legislature, or Knesset, has the power to dissolve the Government and limit the authority of the executive branch. On May 29, Likud Party leader Benyamin Netanyahu was elected Prime Minister; he heads a center-right coalition government. The judiciary is independent. Since its founding in 1948, Israel has been in a state of war with most of its Arab neighbors. It concluded a peace treaty with Egypt in 1979 and with Jordan in 1994. As a result of the 1967 War, occupied the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights. The international community does not recognize Israel's sovereignty over any part of the occupied territories. Throughout its existence, Israel has experienced numerous terrorist attacks. It relies heavily on its military and security services and retains many security-related regulations from the period of the British Mandate.
    [Show full text]