DOCSLIB.ORG

Moses Mendelssohn's Subjectivity and The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moses Mendelssohn's Subjectivity and The View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons HOW TO BELIEVE IN NOTHING: MOSES MENDELSSOHN'S SUBJECTIVITY AND THE EMPTY CORE OF TRADITION Yuval Kremnitzer Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 Yuval Kremnitzer All rights reserved Abstract How to Believe in Nothing: Moses Mendelssohn’s Subjectivity and the Empty Core of Tradition Yuval Kremnitzer The purpose of this study is twofold. Firstly, it aims to illuminate key aspects of the work of Moses Mendelssohn (1729-1786), the ‘Father of Jewish Enlightenment,’ in particular, his well-known, and universally rejected, theory of Judaism. Secondly, it brings Mendelssohn’s ideas and insights to bear on the problem of Nihilism, a problem in the development of which Mendelssohn is usually considered to have played a merely incidental role. It is argued that these two domains, seemingly worlds apart, are mutually illuminating. Moses Mendelssohn enters our history books in two separate contexts, which seem to have nothing in common. In the context of ‘Jewish Studies,’ Mendelssohn is best known for his idiosyncratic view of Judaism as a religion devoid of any principles of belief, and for his confidence in its compatibility with reason – positions developed in his Jerusalem: Or, On Religious Power and Judaism (1783). In the history of philosophy, Mendelssohn is known as the last representative of the dogmatic Leibniz-Wolff School, rendered obsolete by Kant’s critical, transcendental turn. In this broader context, Mendelssohn is also widely recognized to have played a role, if only contingently, in the emergence of the term Nihilism at a decisive moment in the historical development of the problem, namely, the so-called pantheism controversy, in the context of which he published his last work of philosophy, Morning Hours: Lectures on God’s existence (1785). And yet he has never been taken as belonging to the development of the problem in its essence. This dissertation aims to show that Moses Mendelssohn’s work offers a decisive intervention in the problem of Nihilism, arguably the fundamental problem of Modernity, an intervention that has great value for contemporary debates of the problem. Following and expanding on Kant’s intervention in the controversy, which I show to have been deeply engaged with Mendelssohn, makes it possible to bring to light Mendelssohn’s unrecognized contribution. In response to Kant’s groundbreaking critical philosophy, which seeks to account for the conditions of possible experience, Mendelssohn develops a theory of the experience of possibility. Implicit in this theory is a profound reformulation of the problem of Nihilism, as a crisis in the experience of possibility. Mendelssohn’s unique post-Kantian philosophical position regarding subjectivity, nature and the divine absolute is given more concrete articulation in being related and traced back to his political theology and his reflections on Judaism. In this way, the two separate lines in Mendelssohn’s reception – as the father of Jewish enlightenment and as an incidental facilitator, or vanishing mediator, in the consequential pantheism controversy – coalesce, and illuminate each other. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION: HOW TO BELIEVE IN NOTHING? MOSES MENDELSSOHN’S SUBJECTIVITY AND THE EMPTY CORE OF TRADITION 1 NIHILISM: OVERVIEW, OR MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING 9 NAME CALLING 19 IN THE UNIVERSITY 24 INTERVENTION: MENDELSSOHN’S NEITHER/NOR 29 PART 1: MENDELSSOHN AND THE PANTHEISM CONTROVERSY 42 1. FROM DUSK TILL DAWN: MENDELSSOHN’S MORNING HOURS AND THE ECLIPSE OF ENLIGHTENMENT 42 1.1 MENDELSSOHN AND KANT, STYLE AND SUBSTANCE 42 1.2 MENDELSSOHN AND THE CRISIS OF ENLIGHTENMENT: INTELLECTUAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE PANTHEISM DEBATE 44 1.3 THE PANTHEISM CONTROVERSY 51 1.4 JACOBI’S CHOICE: HYPER CRITICISM OR HYPOCRISY 67 1.5 CONTINGENCIES: MENDELSSOHN V JACOBI ON SPINOZA AND CONTINGENCY 70 1.6 REORIENTATION: KANT AS A READER OF MENDELSSOHN 76 1.7 THE FIGURATIVE: MEDIATING INTELLIGIBILITY AND SENSIBILITY 80 1.8 COMMON SENSE: THE DOGMATIC ERROR 84 1.9 THE HITCHHIKER’S GUIDE TO THE SUPERSENSIBLE: HOW TO GET THERE, WHERE TO GO, AND WHAT TO DO 87 1.10 RATIONAL BELIEFS: HOW TO BELIEVE WITHOUT BELIEVING 96 2. MENDELSSOHN AND THE EXPERIENCE OF POSSIBILITY 99 2.1 MORNING HOURS – A POST-KANTIAN TEXT? 99 2.2 GOD IS UNCONSCIOUS – MENDELSSOHN’S ORIGINAL PROOF FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD 107 2.3 THE COGITO’S SHADOW: FROM CONDITIONS OF POSSIBLE EXPERIENCE TO THE EXPERIENCE OF POSSIBILITY. 114 2.4 SURPLUS KNOWLEDGE 121 2.5 THE ACTUALITY OF POSSIBILITY 129 2.7 MENDELSSOHN’S CLASH OF THE FACULTIES: THE DIVISION AND UNITY OF COGNITION AND DESIRE 140 2.8 DIVIDED BY COMMON SENSE: JACOBI, KANT, MENDELSSOHN 148 2.9 THE OBJECT OF THOUGHT – BETWEEN DREAM AND REALITY 151 2.10 THE DREAM OF COMMON SENSE 155 2.1 FIGURES OF MIND 158 PART 2: MENDELSSOHN’S JERUSALEM 161 3. READING JERUSALEM 161 3.1 REFUSING THE CHALLENGE – MENDELSSOHN AND JACOBI 161 3.2 WHAT IS ENLIGHTENMENT? THE DIVISION AND UNITY OF THEORY AND PRACTICE 166 3.3 ENLIGHTENMENT’S PREJUDICE 168 3.4 JERUSALEM’S DIVISION 170 3.5 THE POWER OF DIVISION: THE POLITICAL THEOLOGICAL DIFFERENCE AS A TEMPORAL ONE 173 i 3.6 THE DIVISION OF POWER 182 3.7 THE ORIGINAL DIVIDE 186 3.8 MENDELSSOHN’S MINIMAL ATOMISM 188 3.9 THE FREEDOM OF FORCED CHOICE 192 3.10 THE ARTICULATION OF REALITY AND THE REAL OF THE IMPERATIVE 196 3.11 HAVING POWER 197 3.12 (NO) TIME FOR A CHOICE 199 3.13 THE IMPERATIVE BETWEEN THE PERFORMATIVE AND THE AFFORMATIVE 202 3.14 PROMISE, OATH AND BELIEF IN THE OTHER 207 4. MIRACLE AND TRADITION 214 4.1 THE CONTEXT – IN DEFENSE OF JUDAISM 214 4.2 THE CHALLENGES: CRANZ AND MÖRSCHEL 217 4.3 DIVINE LEGISLATION 220 4.4 THE DIVISION OF TRUTH: NECESSARY, CONTINGENT AND TEMPORAL (HISTORICAL) 222 4.5 EVENT AND AUTHORITY 225 4.6 HEARING VOICES 231 4.7 THE FIRST DETOUR: PROGRESS, BETWEEN THE NAIVE AND THE SKEPTIC 234 4.8 EVERYTHING FUNDAMENTAL: MENDELSSOHN’S ELUSIVE BELIEF 239 4.9 THE SECOND DETOUR: MENDELSSOHN’S CRITIQUE OF MEDIA 245 4.10 THE FORMATION OF LANGUAGE – THE PRIMAL SCENE OF SIGNIFICATION 247 4.11 THE SWERVE OF LANGUAGE 253 4.12 THE FETISHIZING OF MEDIA: MEANS AND MEANING 254 4.13 HIEROGLYPHS AND IDOLATRY 258 4.13 JUDAISM, BETWEEN PAST AND FUTURE 271 BIBLIOGRAPHY 273 ii Acknowledgments In my time as a graduate student at Columbia University, and in the years leading up to my doctoral research, doing graduate and undergraduate work at Tel Aviv University, I had the privilege of learning from teachers, colleagues and friends, who have not only generously shared their insight and knowledge with me, but have also helped shape my intellectual perspective, influencing, often subtly and unbeknownst to me, the very way I listen, read, and ask questions. It is impossible to fully acknowledge all that I owe and everyone to whom I’m indebted, but that is surely no reason not to try. I was fortunate to have in my dissertation committee five scholars I deeply respect and from whom I have learned much more than I could hope to convey. Dan Miron, my dis- sertation supervisor, is a rare intellectual force, whose boundless erudition and absolute command of a wide array of fields of knowledge had left him, after six decades of schol- arship, and an unquestionable standing as a master of his field, as passionate for, and open to new ideas as a freshman college student. Both intellectually and in his institu- tional capacity as the Leonard Kaye professor of Hebrew and Comparative Literature in the department of Middle Eastern, South Asian and African Studies (MESAAS) at Co- lumbia University, Dan had stubbornly kept Jewish studies a field to be pursued within uncommon, and often uncomfortable, challenging contexts. His students, and I amongst them, have been made to confront the necessity, both challenging and opportune, to iii negotiate the boundaries of the field, and aim to strike a balance between rigorous spe- cialization and broad intellectual concerns. Every time I had stepped into Dan’s office I left it both enlightened and uplifted, having learned something valuable I often hadn’t even considered inquiring about. I cannot thank him enough. Mladen Dolar’s ideas and work had a formative influence on me long before I had the good fortune to meet and eventually have him as a reader of my dissertation. Mladen’s capacity to combine conceptual rigor and philosophical originality with a masterful and careful textual work, historically sensitive, has set the standard by which I judge, unfa- vorably, my own work. Mladen’s reading cuts, without fail, straight to the heart of things and formulates the flaws and advantages of the text read with philosophical acumen and in the clearest of terms. I would not have a clear conception of my own work, nor a clear sense of purpose, if it wasn’t for his critical engagement and reading. For his friendship and emotional support throughout the turmoil of writing the dissertation I know not the proper words of gratitude. I wrote my first paper on Kant and Mendelssohn in Dorothea von Mücke’s seminar on Late 18th century German Aesthetics and The Philosophy of History at Columbia Univer- sity. Dorothea is a model citizen of the intellectual community, once known as the re- public of letters. I owe a great debt not only to Dorothea’s provocative intellectual frame- work, which combines intellectual and literary history with a deep engagement and un- derstanding of philosophy, and offers a fresh, critical approach to the enlightenment, but iv also to her encouragement, her exacting reading of my work, and her deep investment in the prospects and opportunities of young scholars, such as myself, lucky enough to have her as a mentor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teaching Plato in Palestine: Philosophy in a Divided World
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. 1 TEACHING PLATO IN PALESTINE Can philosophy save the Middle East? It can. This, at least, is the thesis of Sari Nusseibeh as I learn from a friend upon arriving in Israel in February 2006. Nusseibeh is not only a prominent Palestinian intellectual and the Palestinian Liberation Organization’s former chief repre- sentative in Jerusalem, but also a philosopher by training (and, I think, by nature, too). “Only philosophy,” the friend tells me he argued during the Shlomo Pines memorial lec- ture in West Jerusalem three years before (aptly titled “On the Relevance of Philosophy in the Arab World Today”). By the time I leave Israel, I’m convinced that he’s on to something. I am here to teach a seminar at Al-Quds University, the Palestinian university in Jerusalem, together with Nus- seibeh, who has been president of Al- Quds since 1995. My idea is to discuss Plato’s political thought with the students and then examine how medieval Muslim and Jewish philosophers built on this thought to interpret Islam and Judaism as philosophical religions. I hope to raise some basic questions about philosophy and its rela- For general queries, contact [email protected] Fraenkel.indb 3 2/17/2015 8:56:12 AM © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanism: the Road from Athens to Jerusalem by DONNALYNN HESS
    Humanism: The Road From Athens to Jerusalem BY DONNALYNN HESS Over the past 30 years numerous Christian leaders have legitimately decried particular evils spawned by secular humanism; few, however, have provided a thoughtful analysis of how this philosophic system has been interwoven into God’s eternal plan. Viewing humanism in the context of sovereignty reveals that this recurring movement is not only a vivid record of fallen man’s impotence but also a divine roadmap that can be used to lead men to the cross. It is, therefore, valuable to reflect upon the significance of the historic signposts God has given. Such reflection can awaken a profound awe of God’s wisdom and compassion; it can also help believers discern (like Paul) how to guide “Athenians” from Mars Hill to Jerusalem. In the preface to Humanist Manifestos I and II (1973), Kurtz noted that “Humanism is a philosophical, religious, and moral point of view as old as human civilization itself” (p. 3). Although the thread of humanism does indeed run throughout the development of civilizations, there are specific reference points that are particularly helpful in discerning its impact on the western world. These reference points include the Greco-Roman period, the Renaissance, and the dawn of the modern age (20th century). Classical Humanism: A Precursor to the Incarnation The most important of the three epochs is the Greco-Roman period, for during this era the key tenets of humanism were formed. To fully understand the movement’s origin we must begin not with Socrates but with Thales, the pre-Socratic philosopher born in Miletos around 640 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiestas and Fervor: Religious Life and Catholic Enlightenment in the Diocese of Barcelona, 1766-1775
    FIESTAS AND FERVOR: RELIGIOUS LIFE AND CATHOLIC ENLIGHTENMENT IN THE DIOCESE OF BARCELONA, 1766-1775 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Andrea J. Smidt, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2006 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Dale K. Van Kley, Adviser Professor N. Geoffrey Parker Professor Kenneth J. Andrien ____________________ Adviser History Graduate Program ABSTRACT The Enlightenment, or the "Age of Reason," had a profound impact on eighteenth-century Europe, especially on its religion, producing both outright atheism and powerful movements of religious reform within the Church. The former—culminating in the French Revolution—has attracted many scholars; the latter has been relatively neglected. By looking at "enlightened" attempts to reform popular religious practices in Spain, my project examines the religious fervor of people whose story usually escapes historical attention. "Fiestas and Fervor" reveals the capacity of the Enlightenment to reform the Catholicism of ordinary Spaniards, examining how enlightened or Reform Catholicism affected popular piety in the diocese of Barcelona. This study focuses on the efforts of an exceptional figure of Reform Catholicism and Enlightenment Spain—Josep Climent i Avinent, Bishop of Barcelona from 1766- 1775. The program of “Enlightenment” as sponsored by the Spanish monarchy was one that did not question the Catholic faith and that championed economic progress and the advancement of the sciences, primarily benefiting the elite of Spanish society. In this context, Climent is noteworthy not only because his idea of “Catholic Enlightenment” opposed that sponsored by the Spanish monarchy but also because his was one that implicitly condemned the present hierarchy of the Catholic Church and explicitly ii advocated popular enlightenment and the creation of a more independent “public sphere” in Spain by means of increased literacy and education of the masses.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconsideration of Montesquieu's Liberal
    ABSTRACT A RECONSIDERATION OF MONTESQUIEU’S LIBERAL PACIFISM James Boesen, PhD Department of Political Science Northern Illinois University, 2017 Andrea Radasanu, Director Liberal international relations scholars have posited that liberalism promotes peaceful relations amongst states. These scholars utilize the writings of Montesquieu, most notably Spirit of the Laws, as the philosophic foundation for their liberal peace theory. My dissertation challenges this conventional understanding of Montesquieu. I contend that Montesquieu’s liberalism does not bind nations together in peace but instead pushes liberal states to engage in expansionary and imperial behavior. Mores rooted in commerce and liberty inclines liberal state to be in contention with other states and push its interests across the globe. This will lead the liberal states to push their liberalism into countries which opposes these liberal mores, leading to the forced imposition of the liberal order on previous illiberal people. Furthermore, I challenge the notion that the liberal peace theory is even a theory of peace. It suffers from the same expansionary behavior and insensitivity to local contexts that we find in Montesquieu’s liberalism. Although Montesquieu and liberal peace scholars have strong oppositions to the project of empire they still advocate for a liberal ideology that inevitably leads to said empire. NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY DE KALB, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2017 A RECONSIDERATION OF MONTESQUIEU’S LIBERAL PACIFISM BY JAMES BOESEN ©2017 James Boesen A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF POLITITCAL SCIENCE Doctoral Director: Andrea Radasanu DEDICATION To my brother Brad Boesen for inspiring in me a love of politics and my mentor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2005 a Decade After the Assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin Asher Arian, Shlomit Barnea
    Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2005 A Decade after the Assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin Asher Arian, Shlomit Barnea, Pazit Ben-Nun, Raphael Ventura, Michal Shamir The Israel Democracy Institute is an independent body that assists the Knesset and its committees, government offices and institutions, local government bodies, and political parties, through studies and proposals designed to bring about changes and reforms in their manner of operation. In addition, the Israel Democracy Institute fulfills its public charge through the presentation of comparative information on legislative topics and the various ways in which democratic regimes function. It also strives to enrich public discourse and encourage new ways of thinking through the initiation of discussion on topics of current political, social and economic interest, both by bringing together legislators, administrators and academics and through the publication of research findings. The Guttman Center was established at The Israel Democracy Institute in 1998 with the transfer of The Guttman Institute for Applied Social Research to the IDI. Formed in 1949 by Professor Louis Guttman, The Guttman Institute was the pioneer of public opinion research and advances in social science methodology in Israel. The goal of The Guttman Center is to enrich research projects at the IDI and discussions of public policy with data-based information and analyses. Editor-in-Chief Uri Dromi Publishing Director Edna Granit Library Editor Yael Mosheiff Content and Hebrew Language Editor Carmit Gai Linguistic Editor (Hebrew) Ronit Tapiero Translator Batya Stein English Editor Asher Weill Copy Editor Naomi Shmueli Production Coordinator Nadav Shtechman Design Ron Haran Printed in Jerusalem, by Art Plus, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Voltaire's Convincement
    Quaker Studies Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 2 1999 Voltaire's Convincement Raymond Ayoub Penn State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/quakerstudies Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Ayoub, Raymond (1999) "Voltaire's Convincement," Quaker Studies: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/quakerstudies/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quaker Studies by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Quaker Studies 4 (1999):1-20 -------- 'On beauty, in the Creation and in the mind.' Th e Yorkshireman 4 (1835): 79-80. Hutchinson, H. Jo nathan Hutchinson. Life and Letters. London: Heinemann Medical, 1946. Miller, J.F. 'Micrometrical measurements of the binary star� Ursre Majoris, and the double star Struve 1263, made at the Observatory, Voltaire's Convincement Whitehaven.' Mo nthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 12 (1851-2): 170. Raymond Ayoub Newman, T.P. Memoir of Life of Edward Newman [1876]. London: FaringdonClassey, 1980. Penn State University Noblett, W. 'William Curtis's botanical library.' Th e Library 9 (1987): 1-22. Penn, W. Some Fruits of Solitude [1693]. London: Constable, 1926 Quaker Studies 4 (1999):21-56 Raistrick, A. Quakers in Science and Industry. Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1968. Abstract Richardson, J. A Sp eech Delivered at a Meeting of the Literary Association, The aim of this essay is to trace theevolution of Voltaire's perspective Sunderland, 30th of 9th Mo nth, 1819; Containing many Useful toward Quakers and Quakerism during the course of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • John Fellows: a Minor American Deist Name of Candidate
    APPROVAL SHEET Title of Thesis: John Fellows: A Minor American Deist Name of Candidate: George L. Stevens, Master of Arts, 1956. Thesis and Abstract Approved: Professor, Department of English. Date approved: May 19, 1956. JOHN FELLOWS: A MINOR AMERICAN DEIST ~y George~. Stevens Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 1956 I, 11 ' t,,j 1, 'l G I '',, :J. The author wishes to thank Dr. Alfredo. Aldridge of the English Department of the University of Maryland, whose advice and assistance made this study possible. Ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I • INTRODUCTION •• . II • THE LIFE OF JOHN FELLOWS. 6 II I • DEISM IN COLONIAL AMERICA . 18 IV. FELLOWS AND ELIHU PALMER. 33 v. FELLOWS AND THOMAS PAINE. 49 Vl. THE THEOPHILANTHROPIST •• 61 VI 1 • FELLOWS: WRITER AND THINKER. 72 VI 11. CONCLUS I ON • • • 94 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY . 99 iii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION In an age of great men many less significant but sti I I interesting figures pass unnoticed. So it was in revolutionary America that the long shadows of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, and Paine almost e­ clipsed the light of other energetic, intel Ii gent, and worthy men. Though such men did not strike fire, though their lives were not beacons to light an age, sti I I much can be gained from considering them. Smaller in stature than the giants, they are closed to the mean of their sur­ roundings and perhaps, in some respects, a better index of the times.
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz's First Solution
    1 TAKING SCRIPTURE SERIOUSLY: LEIBNIZ AND THE JEHOSHAPHAT PROBLEM I. LEIBNIZ’S COMMITMENT TO CHRISTIANITY Leibniz’s commitment to Christianity has been questioned for centuries. In his own day he was referred to by Hanoverian wags as ‘glaubenichts’ (one who believes in nothing) on the grounds that he rarely attended Church or took communion.1 More recently, Stuart Brown has claimed that Leibniz ‘shows a tendency to deism’,2 while George MacDonald Ross has argued that Leibniz was ‘essentially a pagan metaphysician’.3 Both Brown and Ross provide solid grounds for their respective assessments; in Brown’s case, that Leibniz’s thought leaves no room for either miracles or providence as they have been traditionally conceived by Christians,4 and in Ross’ case that Leibniz endorses accounts of creation which bear little relation to – and in fact may be inconsistent with – the Biblical account. It seems undeniable that on certain issues in which his philosophy led him to a position at odds with orthodox Christian thinking, Leibniz had a pronounced tendency to subordinate his theology to his philosophy, with the result that he marginalised certain doctrines one would typically expect a committed 17th/18th-century Christian to hold. This is true not just of creation, miracles and providence, but also of (to take two further examples) prophecy and the age of the world. With regard to prophecy, Leibniz favoured naturalistic explanations, being loathe to admit the supernatural in any event bar that of creation.5 And as for chronology, Leibniz’s geological studies led him to suppose that the earth – and hence the world – was considerably older than the 6000-years suggested by a literal reading of the Bible.6 Yet painting Leibniz as little more than a nominal Christian is not straightforward.
    [Show full text]
  • Caravan for Democracy High School Edition Proposed Speakers and Program Modules
    Caravan for Democracy High School Edition Proposed Speakers and Program Modules The below modules reflect topics available for the CFD HSE seminar. Each partnering school and organization will develop a program relevant to their students’ needs. They are listed in no particular order. How to Use this Guide: Module topics are listed on Page 1 On Pages 2 – 10 are detailed lists of our educational modules including a listing of the speakers who present on the topic, along with their specific seminar titles. This will reference you to a page with the speaker’s biography, photo, and lecture topics. To search by presenter, use the Speaker Index on Page 56. *Please note that our list of speakers is constantly growing, contact CFD coordinators for additional speakers who may not appear in the guide. Contact us at: [email protected] or 212-879-9305 ext. 245. MODULE LIST: PAGE Module 1: Effective Advocacy Skills 2 Module 2: Shared Value of Democracy between Israel and the United States 3 Module 3: Motivating for Israel Advocacy – Why Should I Care? 3-4 Module 4: Land and People: Israeli Culture and Society 4-6 Module 5: Israeli History 6-7 Module 6: Contemporary Issues and Current Events in Israel 7-8 Module 7: Understanding Israeli Governmental Systems 9 Module 8: Critically Analyzing Israel in the Media 9-10 Module 9: Being Pro-Israel and Being Critical of Israel – Is it OK? 10 Module 10: Anti-Semitic Vs Anti-Israel: What’s the Difference? 10 Module 11: Perspectives on the IDF 10 *Index of Speakers 58 1 MODULE 1: EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY SKILLS Anti-Defamation League Page 12 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz and the Jehoshaphat Problem
    HeyJ LII (2011), pp. 40–51 TAKING SCRIPTURE SERIOUSLY: LEIBNIZ AND THE JEHOSHAPHAT PROBLEM LLOYD STRICKLAND University of Wales, Lampeter I. LEIBNIZ’S COMMITMENT TO CHRISTIANITY Leibniz’s commitment to Christianity has been questioned for centuries. In his own day he was referred to by Hanoverian wags as ‘glaubenichts’ (one who believes in nothing) on the grounds that he rarely attended Church or took communion.1 More recently, Stuart Brown has claimed that Leibniz ‘shows a tendency to deism’,2 while George MacDonald Ross has argued that Leibniz was ‘essentially a pagan metaphysician’.3 Both Brown and Ross provide solid grounds for their respective assessments; in Brown’s case, that Leibniz’s thought leaves no room for either miracles or providence as they have been traditionally conceived by Christians,4 and in Ross’ case that Leibniz endorses accounts of creation which bear little relation to – and in fact may be inconsistent with – the Biblical account. It seems undeniable that on certain issues in which his philosophy led him to a position at odds with orthodox Christian thinking, Leibniz had a pronounced tendency to subordinate his theology to his philosophy, with the result that he marginalised certain doctrines one would typically expect a committed 17th/18th-century Christian to hold. This is true not just of creation, miracles and providence, but also of (to take two further examples) prophecy and the age of the world. With regard to prophecy, Leibniz favoured naturalistic explanations, being loathe to admit the supernatural in any event bar that of creation.5 And as for chronology, Leibniz’s geological studies led him to suppose that the earth – and hence the world – was considerably older than the 6000-years suggested by a literal reading of the Bible.6 Yet painting Leibniz as little more than a nominal Christian is not straightforward.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Philosopher Voltaire Once Said, 'A Hundred Years from My
    The French philosopher Voltaire once said, ‘A hundred years from my death the Bible will be a museum piece.’ A hundred years after his death the French Bible Society set up its headquarters in Voltaire’s old home in Paris. On Bible Sunday we celebrate the most popular – but often un-read – book in the world. Under-read in the West at any rate. And yet when the new sovereign is given a Bible at his or her coronation it’s with these words, ‘We present you with this book, the most valuable thing that this world affords. Here is wisdom; this is the royal law; these are the lively oracles of God.’ You couldn’t set the bar much higher. This is the book on which civilisations have been founded, for which people have given their lives to the flames, for which people have risked everything so they could smuggle it into repressive countries, the book that people in distant countries, this very day, are desperate to own. And it sits on our shelves, undisturbed. Jesus was much more respectful of the scriptures. Indeed, in today’s reading from Luke we see him affirming three essential elements of Judaism – the scriptures, the sabbath and the synagogue. All adult males were permitted to read the scriptures and to comment on it, as the somewhat informal synagogue service became a characteristic form of sabbath observance. From the time of Jesus onwards we see both synagogue and scriptures growing in influence and importance until, after the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70 and destruction of the Temple, the synagogue emerged as a substitute for the Temple, though without altar or priest, and Judaism became a religion of the Book.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses Mendelssohn's Approach to Jewish Integration in Light of His Reconciliation of Traditional Judaism and Enlightenment Rationalism Robert J
    Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville History and Government Faculty Publications Department of History and Government 2005 Moses Mendelssohn's Approach to Jewish Integration in Light of His Reconciliation of Traditional Judaism and Enlightenment Rationalism Robert J. Clark Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/ history_and_government_publications Part of the Cultural History Commons, European History Commons, German Language and Literature Commons, History of Religion Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Robert J., "Moses Mendelssohn's Approach to Jewish Integration in Light of His Reconciliation of Traditional Judaism and Enlightenment Rationalism" (2005). History and Government Faculty Publications. 208. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/history_and_government_publications/208 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in History and Government Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fiske Hall Graduate Seminar Award* Moses Mendelssohn's Approach to Jewish Integration in Light of His Reconciliation of Traditional Judaism and Enlightenment Rationalism Robert J. Clark INTRODUCTION Prior to the eighteenth century, European Jews lived in separate communal structures at the discretion of their host countries. 1 A very few found places of influence and wealth as "court Jews" and lived as aristocrats, but their acceptance in society was limited, subject to official approval, and came at a price.2 There had always been opportunities for Jews to integrate into European society, albeit not without complication, via assimilation and conversion.3 But the ability to enter the social order as Jews and find a place to belong without rejecting their heritage and religion proved elusive.
    [Show full text]