DOCSLIB.ORG

Strike Fighters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strike Fighters Strike Fighters An analysis of loaded performance in representative combat scenarios for top-of-the-line Western manufactured fighter aircraft in a mid-2020 timeframe by James “Spurts” Nicklin 1 Table of Contents 1 Aircraft ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Size ......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Load ....................................................................................... 8 1.2.1 Fuel .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2 Systems .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.3 Weapons ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 1.3 Physical Factors .................................................................... 25 1.3.1 Wing Loading ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 1.3.2 Thrust to Weight .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 1.3.3 Stability .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 25 1.3.4 Drag Area ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 1.3.5 Lift Area .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 1.4 Aircraft Data ......................................................................... 27 1.4.1 F-15SA .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 2 Performance ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.1 Loaded Flight Configurations ............................................... 28 2.1.1 F-15SA .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.1.2 Su-35S .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.2 Loaded Flight Envelopes ...................................................... 29 2.2.1 Level Flight ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29 2.2.2 Turn at 20,000ft ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 2.2.3 Acceleration 0.8-1.2M @30,000ft .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 2.3 Applied Performance ........................................................... 31 2.3.1 Rutowski Push ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 31 2.3.2 Combat Turns ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 2.4 Systems Performance .......................................................... 33 2.4.1 Detection of Aerial Threats .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 2.4.2 Avoidance of Aerial Threats ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 2.4.3 Detection of SAM Threats ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 2.4.4 Avoidance of SAM Threats ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 2.5 Mission Performance ........................................................... 34 2.5.1 Interception ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 2.5.2 CAP ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 2.5.3 Deep Strike ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 35 2.5.4 CAS ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 2.6 Total Scores.......................................................................... 37 2.6.1 F-15SA .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 2.6.2 Su-35S ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US Export Controls
    U.S. Export Controls A Commerce Department Perspective EAR BOOT CAMP ECCN, EAR99 and the 600 Series Chicago, IL Oct 9, 2013 Gene Christiansen 202 482 2894 [email protected] Factors to be considered in determining if item is “subject to the EAR” • Jurisdiction – Characteristics of Item: • Nuclear---Energy, NRC, Commerce • Military---USML, Commerce • Destination Country – For Cuba, Iran, N Korea, N Sudan and Syria---OFAC • Public Domain technology and software What is covered under the Commerce Control List (CCL) • Everything not under the jurisdiction of another Agency or technical data that is not in the public domain. See part 734.3 – All items in the United States – All U.S. origin items wherever they are – Foreign made items that include in excess of de minimis value of controlled U.S. origin content. – Foreign made items that are the direct product of certain U.S. origin technical data or software. – Certain commodities produced by any plant located outside the U.S. that is the direct product of certain U.S. origin technical data or software Navigating the Commerce Control List (CCL) • The Commerce Control List – 10 categories • 0 Nuclear and miscellaneous • 1 Materials, chemicals, microorganisms, toxins • 2 Materials processing • 3 Electronics computers • 4 Computers • 5 Telecommunications and encryption • 6 Sensors • 7 Navigation and avionics • 8 Marine • 9 Propulsion systems and space vehicles Navigating the Commerce Control List • The Commerce Control List – 5 groups • A--- Equipment—end items • B--- Test and production
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfcreator, Job 2
    F-100 for AMT Pegasus jet engine or Jet CAT P-120 / P-160 Assembly Manual NcVNaV\[-QrÅvt{ ZI le chenet, 91490 Milly La Foret, FRANCE Tel : 33 1 64 98 93 93 Fax : 33 1 64 98 93 88 E-mail : [email protected] www.adjets.com Version 01/10/2006 1 INTRODUCTION The F-100 from NcVNaV\[-QR`VT[ is designed for high thrust jet engines. It is a scale kit, with all the panel lines engraved in the fuselage and a lot of scale details (gears, hinges, cockpit...). It is fully molded in fiberglass, carbon and epoxy. The flight characteristics are excellent with low and high speed capability. The model has plug in wings, stabs and fin. F-100 is avaialable : - in ’’C’’ version with small fin and small fixed flaps - in ’’D’’ version with larger fin and large movable flaps F-100 model includes - High quality epoxy-glass fuselage painted. - All plywood and wood parts premounted. - Epoxy-glass inlet - Exhaust nozzle. - Fully molded wings, stabs and fin painted - Access hatch requiring no additional framework. - ABS cockpit interior. - Clear formed canopy. - All hardware (ball links, bearings, screws ...) - Instructions in English. To complete the kit : The following items are not included in the kit. They are available from NcVNaV\[-QR`VT[. Jet Engine : 1 Complete AMT Pegasus jet engine or 1 Jet Cat P120 or P160 Cockpit detail kit : ref : ADJ 465 This kit include : 1/7 full body jet pilot, 1/7 ejector seat & instrument panel. 2 Landing gear : ref : ADJ 467 NÑvnÇv|{-QrÅvt{ retractable landing gear is specially designed for the F-100.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2011. ■ 2012 USAF Almanac Bombers B-1 Lancer Brief: A long-range, air refuelable multirole bomber capable of flying intercontinental missions and penetrating enemy defenses with the largest payload of guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory. Function: Long-range conventional bomber. Operator: ACC, AFMC. First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); Oct. 18, 1984 (B-1B). Delivered: June 1985-May 1988. IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Tex. (B-1B). Production: 104. Inventory: 66. Aircraft Location: Dyess AFB, Tex.; Edwards AFB, Calif.; Eglin AFB, Fla.; Ellsworth AFB, S.D. Contractor: Boeing, AIL Systems, General Electric. Power Plant: four General Electric F101-GE-102 turbofans, each 30,780 lb thrust. Accommodation: pilot, copilot, and two WSOs (offensive and defensive), on zero/zero ACES II ejection seats. Dimensions: span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 ft, height 34 ft. B-1B Lancer (SSgt. Brian Ferguson) Weight: max T-O 477,000 lb. Ceiling: more than 30,000 ft. carriage, improved onboard computers, improved B-2 Spirit Performance: speed 900+ mph at S-L, range communications. Sniper targeting pod added in Brief: Stealthy, long-range multirole bomber that intercontinental. mid-2008. Receiving Fully Integrated Data Link can deliver nuclear and conventional munitions Armament: three internal weapons bays capable of (FIDL) upgrade to include Link 16 and Joint Range anywhere on the globe. accommodating a wide range of weapons incl up to Extension data link, enabling permanent LOS and Function: Long-range heavy bomber.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY in HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT FLIGHT LOADS* Mike Love, Tony De La Garza, Eric Charlton, Dan Egle Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
    ICAS 2000 CONGRESS COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY IN HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT FLIGHT LOADS* Mike Love, Tony De La Garza, Eric Charlton, Dan Egle Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Keywords: computational aeorelasticity, CFD, flight loads Abstract A computational aeroelasticity method has been developed that combines a compu- tational fluid dynamics (CFD) code based on a finite volume, Cartesian / prismatic grid scheme with automated unstructured grid creation and adaption with established structural finite element methods. This analysis is motivated by the need to develop an analysis capability for fighter-aircraft critical flight loads. Flight conditions for such often reside in transonic flow regimes and comprise nonlinear aerodynamics due to shocks, flow-separation onset, and complex geometry. The Multidisciplinary Computa- tional Environment, MDICE [1], is provid- Figure 1: Pressures and streamlines obtained from a ing for timely integration of Lockheed computational aeroelastic maneuver simulation Martin’s CFD software, SPLITFLOW [2] in in maneuver simulations. The Loads engi- a maintenance friendly, loosely coupled neer’s time is mostly consumed in the nonlinear analysis method. Analysis corre- assembly of accurate data for the maneuver lation with static aeroelastic wind tunnel simulation. Adequate characterization of data demonstrates potential. Analysis set-up vehicle aerodynamics is critical. Recent tool and results for a fighter aircraft with multi- and technology developments are facilitating ple control surfaces are demonstrated. the aerodynamic characterization task of integrating data from CFD methods, wind 1 Introduction tunnel testing and other aerodynamic meth- ods to assemble an aerodynamic pressure Computational aeroelasticity, or computa- database [3, 4]. This database is augmented tional fluid dynamics (CFD) based aeroelas- by static aeroelastic analyses to account for ticity, is an emerging technology with high flexibility effects of the structure and inertial potential for the development of critical effects of the flight vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Certification of the F-16 Block 52+ Aircraft 29 November 2005 2005 USAF Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference
    Structural Certification of the F-16 Block 52+ Aircraft 29 November 2005 2005 USAF Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference Robert J. Burt Director and Deputy F-35 Structural Development and Integrity Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Fort Worth © 2005 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Structural Certification of the F-16 Block 52+ Aircraft Abstract This presentation will describe in some detail the process followed by Lockheed Martin Aeronautics – Fort Worth for the structural certification of the new production F-16 Block 52+ aircraft for foreign military sales (FMS). The F-16 Block 52+ aircraft are structurally upgraded from the USAF Block 50/52 aircraft due to carriage of the fuselage shoulder mounted conformal fuel tanks and due to the addition of numerous advanced systems. The structural requirements and their methods of verification are set forth in the program contract and subsequent program documents such as the weapon system specification and air vehicle specification. Every USAF and FMS F-16 has an Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP) based upon program contractual requirement and tailored to MIL-STD-1530B Aircraft Structural Integrity Program. An ASIP Master Plan has been written for the Block 52+ aircraft which has been coordinated with and approved by the USAF F-16 System Group. This ASIP Master Plan states in specific terms how all the tasking outlined in the “five pillars” is accomplished. An overall design process will be discussed in depth pointing out how all historical structural analysis, structural test and field information has been used in the structural design of the Block 52+ aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Order 00-105E-9, 1 February 2006, Revision 11
    WELCOME TO TECHNICAL ORDER 00-105E-9, 1 FEBRUARY 2006, REVISION 11. THIS IS SEGMENT 11 COVERING CHAPTER 8 FROM THE QF-4 TO F-16. TO NAVIGATE CLICK ON THE CONTINUE BOOKMARKS AND CLICK ON THE (+) SYMBOLS, THEN NOTICE CLICK ON SUBJECT LINKS TO GO TO SPECIFIC VIEWS CONTACT IN THIS SEGMENT. TO GO DIRECTLY TO THE TECHNICAL ORDER, CLICK ON THE CONTINUE BUTTON. TO SEE THE SEGMENT INFORMATION CHANGE NOTICE, CLICK ON THE NOTICE BUTTON. TO CONTACT THE TECHNICAL CONTENT MANAGER , CLICK ON THE CONTACT BUTTON. TECHNICAL ORDER 00-105E-9 TECHNICAL CONTENT MANAGER WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE: HQ AFCESA/CEXF ATTN: Fire and Emergency Services Egress Manager 139 Barnes Drive Suite 1 Tyndall AFB, Florida 32403-5319 E-MAIL: [email protected] INTERNET: HQ AFCESA Fire and Emergency Services PUBLIC WEB PAGE: http://www.afcesa.af.mil/CEX/cexf/index.asp Safety Supplements: http://www.afcesa.af.mil/CEX/cexf/_firemgt.asp PHONE: (850) 283-6150 DSN 523-6150 FAX: (850) 283-6383 DSN 523-6383 For technical order improvements, correcting procedures, and other inquiries, please use the above media most convenient. SEGMENT 11 INFORMATION CHANGE NOTICE This page is provided to notifiy the user of any informational changes made to Technical Order 00-105E-9 in this Segment and the current Revision. Informational changes will be referenced in the Adobe Reader’s Bookmark tool as a designator symbol illustrated as a <[C]> for quick reference to the right of the affected aircraft. The user shall insure the most current information contained in this TO is used for his operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Afsc 2A6x4 Career Field Education and Training Plan
    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE CFETP 2A6X4 Headquarters US Air Force Parts I and II Washington, DC 20330-1030 APRIL 1999 AFSC 2A6X4 AIRCRAFT FUEL SYSTEMS CAREER FIELD EDUCATION AND TRAINING PLAN CAREER FIELD EDUCATION AND TRAINING PLAN AIRCRAFT FUEL SYSTEMS SPECIALTY AFSC 2A6X4 Table of Contents PART I Preface......................................................................................................................................... 2 Abbreviations/Terms Explained.................................................................................................. 3 Section A--General Information..................................................................................................5 Purpose of the CFETP Use of the CFETP Coordination and Approval of the CFETP Section B--Career Progression and Information ......................................................................... 6 Specialty Description Skill/Career Progression Apprentice Level (3) Journeyman Level (5) Craftsman Level (7) Superintendent Level (9) Training Decisions Community College of the Air Force Career Field Path Section C--Skill Level Training Requirements........................................................................... 12 Purpose Training Requirements Apprentice Level (3) Journeyman Level (5) Craftsman Level (7) Superintendent Level (9) Section D--Resource Constraints ................................................................................................ 14 Section E--Transitional Training Guide.....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BY ORDER of the SECRETARY of the AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 11-2F-15E, VOLUME 3 25 OCTOBER 2005 Flying Operations F-15E--OP
    BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 11-2F-15E, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE VOLUME 3 25 OCTOBER 2005 Flying Operations F-15E--OPERATIONS PROCEDURES COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications and forms are available on the e-Publishing website at www.e-publishing.af.mil for downloading or ordering. RELEASABILITY: There are no releasability restrictions on this publication. OPR: HQ ACC/A3T Certified by: HQ USAF/XOO (Maj Gen Teresa M. Peterson) Supersedes AFI11-2F15EV3, 6 Jun 2002 Pages: 86 This volume establishes effective and safe operations of the F-15E and implements AFPD 11-2, Aircraft Rules and Procedures; AFPD 11-4, Aviation Service; and AFI 11-202V3, General Flight Rules. It applies to all F-15E units. It does not apply to ANG and AFRC. MAJCOMs/DRUs/FOAs are to forward proposed MAJCOM/DRU/FOA-level supplements to this volume to HQ AFFSA/XOF, through HQ ACC/A3TO, for approval prior to publication IAW AFPD 11-2. Copies of MAJCOM/DRU/FOA-level supplements, after approved and published, will be provided by the issuing MAJCOM/DRU/FOA to HQ AFFSA/XOF, HQ ACC/A3TO, and the user MAJCOM/DRU/FOA offices of primary responsibility. Field units below MAJCOM/DRU/FOA level will forward copies of their supplements to this volume to their parent MAJ- COM/DRU/FOA office of primary responsibility for post publication review. NOTE: The terms Direct Reporting Unit (DRU) and Field Operating Agency (FOA) as used in this paragraph refer only to those DRUs/FOAs that report directly to HQ USAF.
    [Show full text]
  • SFTE FTE Reference Handbook
    SFTE Reference Handbook Third Edition 2013 Society of Flight Test Engineers Reference Handbook Third Edition 2013 Page - i SFTE Reference Handbook Third Edition 2013 Society of Flight Test Engineers Reference Handbook 2013 Edition Corporate support supplied by Cessna Aircraft for printing the 2007 Edition And The National Test Pilot School Contributing Authors Al Lawless (sections 1-8, 10-12, 15, 18) Greg Lewis (section 2.6) Bill Norton (sections 9, 13) Dan Hrehov (section 14) Steven Arney (section 16) John Minor (section 19) David Kidman, Christopher Moulder, Craig Stevens (section 17) Edited by Lee Gardner & Darcy Painter 1998-2006 Harold Weaver 2006-2013 The SFTE handbook committee continually seeks corporate sponsors for this book and authors for new sections (including but not limited to INS, GPS, EMI/EMF, radar, avionics, R&M, E-O, human factors, orbital mechan- ics, armament) Page - ii SFTE Reference Handbook Third Edition 2013 Publication Policy Copyright (C) 2013 by Society Of Flight Test Engineers All rights reserved. This Technical Handbook is for the exclusive use of the Society of Flight Test Engineers individual and Corporate Members. The Technical information contained herein may not be reproduced by any other individual or organization in any form without writ- ten permission from the Society of Flight Test Engineers. The Society reserves the exclusive right of publication. For further information concerning the publication policy, write to: Society of Flight Test Engineers 44814 N. Elm Avenue Lancaster, California 93534 USA Or: Contact the Society of Flight Test Engineers through their web site at www.sfte.org. Please submit corrections or additions to SFTE Handbook Committee 44814 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2015. By Aaron M. U. Church, Senior Editor ■ 2016 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT B-1 Lancer Brief: Long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and de- livering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. COMMENTARY The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four proto- types were developed and tested before program cancellation in 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998. Its three internal weapons bays accommodate a substantial payload of weapons, including a mix of different weapons in each bay. Lancer production totaled 100 aircraft. The bomber’s blended wing/ body configuration, variable-geometry design, and turbofan engines provide long range and loiter time. The B-1B has been upgraded with GPS, smart weapons, and mission systems. Offensive avionics include SAR for tracking, B-2A Spirit (SSgt. Jeremy M. Wilson) targeting, and engaging moving vehicles and terrain following. GPS-aided INS lets aircrews autonomously navigate without ground-based navigation aids Dimensions: Span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 and precisely engage targets. Sniper pod was added in 2008. The ongoing ft, height 34 ft. integrated battle station modifications is the most comprehensive refresh in Weight: Max T-O 477,000 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautical N83-12038 Engineebing
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA-SP-7G37( 152) ) AERONAUTICAL N83-12038 ENGINEEBING: A CONTINUING EIBLIOGRAfHY (SDPILEHENT 152) (National aeronautics and Space Administration) 95 p HC $5.00 Unclas CSCL OIA 00/01 007m ACCESSION NUMBER RANGES Accession numbers cited in this Supplement fall within the following ranges. STAR (N-10000 Series) N82-24161 - N82-26198 IAA (A-10000 Series) A82-31677 - A82-34964 This bibliography was prepared by the NASA Scientific and Technical Information Facility operated for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration by PRC Government Information Systems NASASP-7037(152) AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING A CONTINUING BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH INDEXES (Supplement 152) A selection of annotated references to unclassified reports and journal articles that were introduced into the NASA scientific and technical information sys- tem and announced in August 1982 in • Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports (STAR) • International Aerospace Abstracts (IAA) Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1982 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC This supplement is available as NTISUB 141 093 from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) Springfield, Virginia 22161 at the price of S5 00 domestic, S10 00 foreign INTRODUCTION Under the terms of an interagency agreement with the Federal Aviation Administration this publication has been prepared by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for the joint use of both agencies and the scientific and technical community concerned with the field of aeronautical engineering. The first issue of this bibliography was published in September 1970 and the first supplement in January 1971. This supplement to Aeronautical Engineering -- A Continuing Bibliography (NASA SP- 7037) lists 338 reports, journal articles, and other documents originally announced in August 1982 in Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports (STAR) or in International Aerospace Abstracts (IAA).
    [Show full text]
  • USG “600 Series” License Review Panel: Overview, Preparation, and Best Practices
    10/30/2015 USG “600 Series” License Review Panel: Overview, Preparation, and Best Practices “600 Series” Interagency Review Observations: A BIS Perspective Mary Quach Munitions Control Division (MCD) Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security (SIES) 1 10/30/2015 “600 Series” License Processing • Executive Order 12981 – Days 0-9: Initial Commerce Review – Next 30 days: Interagency Review • 15 CFR 750.4 – Contact applicant for additional information – Verify the classification of the items – RWA if no license is required – Refer to other agencies (State, Energy, Defense) – Issue license or Intent to Deny letter 3 “600 series” License Processing • Hold Without Action (HWA) – Stops license processing clock – Only allowed in certain situations • More information needed from applicant • Pre-license checks • Return Without Action (RWA) – Correct errors in application – No response to request for more information 4 2 10/30/2015 Policy Review • License exception availability (Part 740) – STA (Strategic Trade Authorization) – GOV (U.S. & Cooperating Governments) – LVS (Limited Value Shipments) – TMP (Temporary Exports) – RPL (Replacements and Repairs) – BAG (Baggage) • Foreign policy developments – Country policies (regime members, countries of concern) – Regional policies 5 Compliance Review • Precedent authorizations – Attach or note precedent authorizations – Identify which parties were previously authorized to receive like items • All parties properly listed – No P.O. boxes – Additional consignees in Block 19 and described in Block
    [Show full text]