DOCSLIB.ORG

A35 Chideock Air Quality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A35 Chideock Air Quality A35 Chideock Air Quality Assessment of Platooning Alternate Direction Single-Lane Traffic Flows Document No. 1.0 | 1.4 05 April 2019 SW 130 18/19 CH2M Document Ti tle Assessment of Platooning Alternate Direction Single- Lane Traffic Flows Project Name Project No: 679475.ST.17.65.45 Document Title: Assessment of Platooning Alternate Direction Single-Lane Traffic Flows Document No.: 1.0 Revision: 1.4 Date: 05 April 2019 Client Name: Highways England Client No: Client Reference Project Manager: Mike Howell Author: Paige Smith/Joanna Mole/ Piercarlo Smith/Umma Tammima File Name: Chideock AQ – Platooning Soln - FINAL Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75201 United States T +1.214.638.0145 F +1.214.638.0447 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2018 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 1.0 31.07.18 Report on the assessment of vehicle platooning JM/PS/DL/PCS SW/PCS JM 1.1 16.08.18 Report incorporates client comments from AR/AB/SN, JM/PS/PCS/UT JM JM additional air quality data, additional mapping and commentary on micro-simulation and air quality modelling 1.2 07.09.18 Minor revision deleting reference to Investment Decision JM JM JM Committee in August 2018 and referring to speed limit on A35 1.3 30.10.18 Revised report incorporating client comments received 12 PS MH MH October 2018 1.4 05.04.19 Final version PS MH MH Document No. i Assessment of Platooning Alternate Direction Single- Lane Traffic Flows Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Background ............................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Air Quality and Traffic Data...................................................................................................................... 9 4. Safety and Capacity ................................................................................................................................ 15 5. Micro-simulation Modelling ................................................................................................................... 17 Model Background ................................................................................................................................................ 17 Model Specification ............................................................................................................................................... 17 Model Limitations .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Changes to Model ................................................................................................................................................. 18 Option Testing ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Model Outputs ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Model Runs ........................................................................................................................................................... 18 Queue Lengths ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 Journey Times ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Vehicle Network Performance Statistics ............................................................................................................... 19 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 20 6. CCTV Footage Survey ............................................................................................................................ 22 CCTV Camera Data Collection ............................................................................................................................. 22 Observations ......................................................................................................................................................... 22 7. Summary and Next Steps....................................................................................................................... 24 Summary ............................................................................................................................................................... 24 Next Steps ............................................................................................................................................................. 25 Appendix A. Additional Information Appendix B. Queue Monitoring Document No. ii Assessment of Platooning Alternate Direction Single- Lane Traffic Flows Important Note The report be read in full with no excerpts to be representative of the findings The report has been prepared exclusively for Jacobs’ client and no liability is accepted for any use or reliance on the report by third parties 3 Assessment of Platooning Alternate Direction Single- Lane Traffic Flows 1. Introduction Air quality observations on the A35 at Chideock in Dorset have been shown to exceed the UK Air Quality Strategy annual mean objective for Nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The location is a single carriageway road through the village of Chideock and forms part of the Strategic Road Network. It is likely that the proximity of the houses to the road, together with the volume of traffic and possibly the gradient are localised factors causing the high concentrations and exceedance of NO2 thresholds at the property facades. Recorded annual mean values from dispersion tubes are above the 40µg/m3 threshold range and range up to 58.9µg/m³. Local community leaders are now promoting the potential establishment of a Clean Air Zone and the Chideock By-pass Working Group (CBWG) are putting forward the case for a bypass. Highways England is engaging with the communities and elected leaders and requires evidence to inform the discussion and exploration of air quality mitigation options. It is understood that the local authority has considered various options to address this complex air quality issue. These range from promoting alternatives to road transport, road traffic management, reducing vehicle emissions and using statutory powers to limit the impact of air pollution. Highways England has asked Jacobs to undertake initial work in relation to one specific option to address air quality, specifically, an approach for platooning alternate direction single-lane traffic flows. This option could potentially smooth traffic flow and by changing the carriageway to a single lane moves the source of pollutants a greater distance away from the properties. The scope of work is as follows: i. Review background information and data regarding the air quality issue at A35 Chideock. This includes a brief explanation of the context, leading to the designation of the AQMA and what actions have been done since ii. Assess this solution from a traffic engineering perspective, particularly in terms of capacity and safety iii. Review traffic data and re-run an existing micro-simulation model to assess the impact of platooning single-lane vehicle flows through traffic signalling in Chideock iv. Summarise the outcome from the study and next steps 4 Assessment of Platooning Alternate Direction Single- Lane Traffic Flows 2. Background Location The village of Chideock is situated in a valley with steep inclines at both ends of the village, particularly Chideock Hill, as illustrated in Figure 2.1. It is bi-sected by the A35 trunk road, a single carriageway road, which links the towns of Honiton, Bridport and Dorchester. It is the main route along the Dorset coast for local trips, commuters, long distance journeys and tourist traffic. Figure 2.1: Chideock Hill A traffic count undertaken in 2007 showed that there were approximately 16,000 vehicles per day travelling on the A35 trunk road. The recent two-way Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volume from sites at Morecombelake to the west of the village was 16,609 vehicles and the 2017 AADT for London Inn to the east was 16,463 vehicles. The route is used by heavy goods vehicles. Data from the site at London Inn shows 16% of vehicular movements are HGVs. There are speed restriction cameras that reduce vehicle speeds to 30mph at both ends of the village. 5 Assessment of Platooning Alternate Direction Single- Lane Traffic Flows AQMA Designation This section includes a brief explanation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Records of Bristol Cathedral
    BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY’S PUBLICATIONS General Editors: MADGE DRESSER PETER FLEMING ROGER LEECH VOL. 59 RECORDS OF BRISTOL CATHEDRAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 RECORDS OF BRISTOL CATHEDRAL EDITED BY JOSEPH BETTEY Published by BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY 2007 1 ISBN 978 0 901538 29 1 2 © Copyright Joseph Bettey 3 4 No part of this volume may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, 5 electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any other information 6 storage or retrieval system. 7 8 The Bristol Record Society acknowledges with thanks the continued support of Bristol 9 City Council, the University of the West of England, the University of Bristol, the Bristol 10 Record Office, the Bristol and West Building Society and the Society of Merchant 11 Venturers. 12 13 BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY 14 President: The Lord Mayor of Bristol 15 General Editors: Madge Dresser, M.Sc., P.G.Dip RFT, FRHS 16 Peter Fleming, Ph.D. 17 Roger Leech, M.A., Ph.D., FSA, MIFA 18 Secretaries: Madge Dresser and Peter Fleming 19 Treasurer: Mr William Evans 20 21 The Society exists to encourage the preservation, study and publication of documents 22 relating to the history of Bristol, and since its foundation in 1929 has published fifty-nine 23 major volumes of historic documents concerning the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Wednesday Volume 672 26 February 2020 No. 30 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 26 February 2020 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 299 26 FEBRUARY 2020 300 Stephen Crabb: As we prepare to celebrate St David’s House of Commons Day, now is a good moment to celebrate the enormous and excellent progress that has been made in reducing unemployment in Wales. Does my right hon. Friend Wednesday 26 February 2020 agree that what is really encouraging is the fact that the long-term lag between Welsh employment levels and the The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock UK average has now closed, with more people in Wales going out to work than ever before? PRAYERS Simon Hart: I am grateful to my right hon. Friend and constituency neighbour for raising this issue. He will be as pleased as I am that the figures in his own [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] constituency, when compared with 2010, are as good as they are. It is absolutely right that the Government’s job, in collaboration with the Welsh Government if that is necessary, is to ensure we create the circumstances Oral Answers to Questions where that trend continues. He has my absolute assurance that that will be the case. Christina Rees (Neath) (Lab/Co-op): Will the Secretary WALES of State provide the House with specific details on how many people have been affected by the catastrophic flood damage to residential properties and businesses The Secretary of State was asked— across Wales, and exactly how much has been lost to the Universal Credit Welsh economy so far? Simon Hart: I should start by saying that, during the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • British Family Names
    cs 25o/ £22, Cornrll IBniwwitg |fta*g BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF Hcnrti W~ Sage 1891 A.+.xas.Q7- B^llll^_ DATE DUE ,•-? AUG 1 5 1944 !Hak 1 3 1^46 Dec? '47T Jan 5' 48 ft e Univeral, CS2501 .B23 " v Llb«"y Brit mii!Sm?nS,£& ori8'" and m 3 1924 olin 029 805 771 The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029805771 BRITISH FAMILY NAMES. : BRITISH FAMILY NAMES ftbetr ©riain ano fIDeaning, Lists of Scandinavian, Frisian, Anglo-Saxon, and Norman Names. HENRY BARBER, M.D. (Clerk), "*• AUTHOR OF : ' FURNESS AND CARTMEL NOTES,' THE CISTERCIAN ABBEY OF MAULBRONN,' ( SOME QUEER NAMES,' ' THE SHRINE OF ST. BONIFACE AT FULDA,' 'POPULAR AMUSEMENTS IN GERMANY,' ETC. ' "What's in a name ? —Romeo and yuliet. ' I believe now, there is some secret power and virtue in a name.' Burton's Anatomy ofMelancholy. LONDON ELLIOT STOCK, 62, PATERNOSTER ROW, E.C. 1894. 4136 CONTENTS. Preface - vii Books Consulted - ix Introduction i British Surnames - 3 nicknames 7 clan or tribal names 8 place-names - ii official names 12 trade names 12 christian names 1 foreign names 1 foundling names 1 Lists of Ancient Patronymics : old norse personal names 1 frisian personal and family names 3 names of persons entered in domesday book as HOLDING LANDS temp. KING ED. CONFR. 37 names of tenants in chief in domesday book 5 names of under-tenants of lands at the time of the domesday survey 56 Norman Names 66 Alphabetical List of British Surnames 78 Appendix 233 PREFACE.
    [Show full text]
  • International Passenger Survey, 2008
    UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump)
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset and East Devon Coast for Inclusion in the World Heritage List
    Nomination of the Dorset and East Devon Coast for inclusion in the World Heritage List © Dorset County Council 2000 Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum June 2000 Published by Dorset County Council on behalf of Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum. Publication of this nomination has been supported by English Nature and the Countryside Agency, and has been advised by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the British Geological Survey. Maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey maps with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: LA 076 570. Maps and diagrams reproduced/derived from British Geological Survey material with the permission of the British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved. Permit Number: IPR/4-2. Design and production by Sillson Communications +44 (0)1929 552233. Cover: Duria antiquior (A more ancient Dorset) by Henry De la Beche, c. 1830. The first published reconstruction of a past environment, based on the Lower Jurassic rocks and fossils of the Dorset and East Devon Coast. © Dorset County Council 2000 In April 1999 the Government announced that the Dorset and East Devon Coast would be one of the twenty-five cultural and natural sites to be included on the United Kingdom’s new Tentative List of sites for future nomination for World Heritage status. Eighteen sites from the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories have already been inscribed on the World Heritage List, although only two other natural sites within the UK, St Kilda and the Giant’s Causeway, have been granted this status to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Roads Are Often Crowded, Frequently in Poor Condition, Chronically Underfunded, and Are Becoming More Dangerous
    OVERVIEW America’s roads are often crowded, frequently in poor condition, chronically underfunded, and are becoming more dangerous. More than two out of every five miles of America’s urban interstates are congested and traffic delays cost the country $160 billion in wasted time and fuel in 2014. One out of every five miles of highway pavement is in poor condition and our roads have a significant and increasing backlog of rehabilitation needs. After years of decline, traffic fatalities increased by 7% from 2014 to 2015, with 35,092 people dying on America’s roads. CAPACITY & CONDITION With over four million miles of roads crisscrossing the United States, from 15 lane interstates to residential streets, roads are among the most visible and familiar forms of infrastructure. In 2016 alone, U.S. roads carried people and goods over 3.2 trillion miles—or more than 300 round trips between Earth and Pluto. After a slight dip during the 2008 recession, Americans are driving more and vehicle miles travelled hit a record high in 2016. With more traffic on the roads, it is no surprise that America’s congestion problem is getting worse, but adding additional lanes or new roads to the highway system will not solve congestion on its own. More than two out of every five miles of the nation’s urban interstates are congested. Of the country’s 100 largest metro areas, all but five saw increased traffic congestion from 2013 to 2014. In 2014, Americans spent 6.9 billion hours delayed in traffic—42 hours per driver. All of that sitting in traffic wasted 3.1 billion gallons of fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Permanence of Limited Access Highways*
    The Permanence of Limited Access Highways* Adolf D. M ay, Jr. Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering Clarkson College of Technology Potsdam, N. Y. Almost all studies of urban and state highway needs point out that in general streets and highways are not adequate for present traffic. Furthermore, these studies indicate that future traffic will have greater demands, and unless more action is taken, the highways will deteriorate, structurally and geometrically, at a rate faster than they can be replaced. The American way of life is dependent upon highways, as ex­ emplified by the rapid development of commercial, industrial, and residential areas along a new highway. In certain cases, this land development has occurred before the highway was opened to traffic. In the development of a new high-type highway, design features are controlled to permit optimum safe speeds, but as soon as some highways are open there is so much of a conflict between the high speed of through traffic and the variable speed of local traffic that control of speed is often a necessity. Soon afterwards, slow signs, blinking lights, and finally stop signs and traffic lights become necessary, thus decreasing the effectiveness in the movement of through traffic. Then it is usually too late and too expensive to rehabilitate the geometric design of the route, and the usual procedure is to leave the existing route to serve adjacent property and to build a new route for the through traffic. However, without protection of the new route from the development of the adjacent property, the strangulation will occur again and the highway, particularly near urban areas, will again become geometrically inadequate for the intended purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • The Automobile Accident Insurance Act
    1 AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT INSURANCE c A-35 The Automobile Accident Insurance Act being Chapter A-35 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1978 (effective February 26, 1979) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1979, c.69; 1979-80, c.92; 1980-81, c.34 and 83; 1982-83, c.16 and 22; 1983, c.66, 80 and 82; 1983-84, c.1, 16 and 54; 1984-85-86, c.1 and 47; 1986, c.1 and 33; 1986-87-88, c.29; 1988-89, c.37, c.42, c.44, c.54 and c.55; 1989-90, c.15; 1990-91, c.35; 1992, c.20; 1994, c.34; 1996, c.9; 1997, c.S-50.11 and 12; 1998, c.18; 2000, c.A-5.3, I-2.01 and 5; 2001, c.33; 2002, c.44; 2004, c.L-16.1, T-18.1 and 35; 2005, c.5; 2006, c.25; 2011, c.3; 2012, c.14; 2013, c.S-15.1, W-17.11 and c.27; 2014, c.E-13.1; 2015, c.F-13.1001, c.I-9.11, c.21 and c.28; 2016, c.11, c.27 and c.28; 2018, c.6, c.21 and c.42; and 2020, c.20. NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been incorporated for convenience of reference and the original statutes and regulations should be consulted for all purposes of interpretation and application of the law. In order to preserve the integrity of the original statutes and regulations, errors that may have appeared are reproduced in this consolidation.
    [Show full text]
  • ANALYSIS of HIGHWAY CONCESSIONS in EUROPE French Study for the DERD/WERD
    CONTENTS ANALYSIS OF HIGHWAY CONCESSIONS IN EUROPE French Study for the DERD/WERD INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………….….1 I. ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSION PRACTICE IN EUROPE ……………………………2 I.1 TOLL CONCESSIONS …………………………………………………………………………………..5 I.1.1 Toll system advantages and disadvantages I.I.2. Toll system functions I.1.3. Acceptability of toll systems in Europe I.2 SHADOW TOLL CONCESSIONS…………………………………………………………………….14 I.2.1 Definition I.2.2 Shadow toll practice in Europe I.2.3 Advantages and disadvantages of shadow tolls I.3. INITIAL CONCLUSIONS CONCERNING THE ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSION APPROACH IN EUROPE …………………………………………………………18 I.3.1. Concession approach and remuneration of the concession company I.3.2. Widely varying road infrastructure practice in Europe I.3.3. Concession contracts compared with other infrastructure funding systems I.3.4 Principal merits of concession contracts I.3.5 Integration of socio-economic and equity return in connection with the decision to set up a concession contract I.3.6 Comparison of state-owned and private concession companies II. KEY COMPONENTS OF A ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSION….………………...…38 II. 1. CONCESSION LOT SIZE………………………………………………………………………….…38 II. 2. ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE CONCESSION PERIOD……………………………………..………3 II.3 DEFINITION OF TOLL CHARGES …………………………………………………..………………40 II.3.1 Setting toll charges II.3.2 Remuneration of concession companies on a DBFO type basis – the interesting "traffic band concept II.4 CONCESSION COMPANY SELECTION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA……………………...44 II.5 CONCESSION COMPANY FREEDOM………………………………………………………………46 II.6 SHARING OF RISKS BETWEEN PUBLIC AUTHORITIES AND CONCESSION COMPANIES ……….48 II.6.1. Transfer of risks in the case of a toll concession II.6.2 Transfer of risks in a shadow toll system II.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorials of Old Dorset
    :<X> CM \CO = (7> ICO = C0 = 00 [>• CO " I Hfek^M, Memorials of the Counties of England General Editor : Rev. P. H. Ditchfield, M.A., F.S.A. Memorials of Old Dorset ?45H xr» MEMORIALS OF OLD DORSET EDITED BY THOMAS PERKINS, M.A. Late Rector of Turnworth, Dorset Author of " Wimborne Minster and Christchurch Priory" ' " Bath and Malmesbury Abbeys" Romsey Abbey" b*c. AND HERBERT PENTIN, M.A. Vicar of Milton Abbey, Dorset Vice-President, Hon. Secretary, and Editor of the Dorset Natural History and Antiquarian Field Club With many Illustrations LONDON BEMROSE & SONS LIMITED, 4 SNOW HILL, E.C. AND DERBY 1907 [All Rights Reserved] TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORD EUSTACE CECIL, F.R.G.S. PAST PRESIDENT OF THE DORSET NATURAL HISTORY AND ANTIQUARIAN FIELD CLUB THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED BY HIS LORDSHIP'S KIND PERMISSION PREFACE editing of this Dorset volume was originally- THEundertaken by the Rev. Thomas Perkins, the scholarly Rector of Turnworth. But he, having formulated its plan and written four papers therefor, besides gathering material for most of the other chapters, was laid aside by a very painful illness, which culminated in his unexpected death. This is a great loss to his many friends, to the present volume, and to the county of for Mr. Perkins knew the as Dorset as a whole ; county few men know it, his literary ability was of no mean order, and his kindness to all with whom he was brought in contact was proverbial. After the death of Mr. Perkins, the editing of the work was entrusted to the Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Official Report Parliamentary Debates
    Thursday Volume 695 13 May 2021 No. 3 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 13 May 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 259 13 MAY 2021 Business of the House 260 calm. We ask them to do all they can to halt the House of Commons terrifying attacks and loss of life and to work with allies to help restore a peace process. Thursday 13 May 2021 My predecessor, my right hon. Friend the Member for Walsall South (Valerie Vaz), has a remarkable work ethic, championing colleagues and staff in this place The House met at half-past Nine o’clock and showing calmness in a crisis, and I thank her. She is a hard act to follow. PRAYERS I was also pleased to see in recent elections the high regard that the people of North East Somerset—the Leader of the House’sconstituents—have for their previous [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] MP, his predecessor. They voted in large numbers for Virtual participation in proceedings commenced (Orders, Labour’s Dan Norris as our metro mayor. Will the 4 June and 30 December 2020). Leader of the House join me in congratulating Dan on [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] his successful election as the Mayor of the West of England? Will he support Dan’s call for a better deal for Business of the House his own constituents from this Government? I know that the Leader of the House prizes democracy, Mr Speaker: I welcome Thangam Debbonaire to the one of this country’s greatest exports, so will he agree Front Bench as shadow Leader of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulation of Road Infrastructure Operators in Portugal
    The Regulation of Road Infrastructure Operators in Portugal Extended Abstract Gonçalo Pereira Rosmaninho October 2010 The Regulation of Road Infrastructure Operators in Portugal Extended abstract Technical University of Lisbon Gonçalo Pereira Rosmaninho Abstract In the last two decades the Portuguese road sector has experienced profound changes. The main outcome of these changes is a superior highway network, which allows traveling across almost all the country with comfort and ease. These highways are operated by private entities, through concession contracts signed between them and the public partner, the State directly, or indirectly by the Portugal Road Company (EP). These concessions, which are public-private partnerships, need to be subject to regulation. This regulation could be contained in the concession contracts, or done by a road sector regulator, which in Portugal is the Institute for the Road Sector (InIR). The contract regulation, although with some common features, differs and has specific particularities on each contract type. The regulation duties assigned to InIR, jointly with the concession contracts and the legal framework, defines the Portuguese road sector participation rules. In Portugal, the success of concessions in the road sector can be much higher if there are improvements on contract design and if the regulator becomes more independent, more pro-active, and is endowed with more tools. Keywords: regulation; concession; road sector; contract. 1. Introduction Since the last decade of the past century until nowadays, the Portuguese government has made a great effort to improve the road sector in Portugal, with the main objectives of renewing the network, shortening the distances between the populations and reducing accidents, and this last was a serious problem to solve.
    [Show full text]