Molto Agitato Italy and Mediterranean Security
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Télécharger (79.278 Kb
COMMISSION EUROPEENNE Bruxelles, le 8 mars 2013 CALENDRIER du 11 au 17 mars 2013 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Activités des Institutions Déplacements et visites Lundi 11 mars Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) Mr Andris PIEBALGS receives Secretary of State of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Portugal, Mr Brites PEREIRA and General Affairs Council (GAC) Secretary of State of European Affairs of Portugal, Mr Transport, Telecommunications and Miguel MORAIS LEITÃO Energy Council (TTE Transport) Ms Androulla VASSILIOU in Dublin: gives a press European Parliament plenary session conference at the Royal Hospital Kilmainham (RHK); (11-14/03) delivers opening speech at the "EU Youth conference 2013" organised by the Irish presidency Ms Maria DAMANAKI and Mr Dacian CIOLOŞ in Dublin: deliver speeches at the meeting of the AgriFish Committees Chairpersons from National Parliaments of the European Union. Mr Dacian CIOLOŞ also delivers a speech at the European Young Farmers conference Ms Kristalina GEORGIEVA attends the Friends of Europe event "Japan Seminar - For a More Resilient Word" Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM receives Ms Eva Birgitta OHLSSON, Minister for European Union Affairs of Sweden Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM receives Ms Vesna PUSIĆ, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of Croatia Mardi 12 mars Mr Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ meets Ms M. Michel BARNIER rencontre M. Benoît HAMON, Ministre Lucinda CREIGHTON, Minister of délégué auprès du ministre français de l'Economie et des State for European affairs of Ireland, -
EU Renegotiation: Fighting for a Flexible Union How to Renegotiate the Terms of the UK’S Membership of the EU
EU Renegotiation: Fighting for a Flexible Union How to renegotiate the terms of the UK’s Membership of the EU (Quotation in title taken from President Glyn Gaskarth September 2013 ii © Civitas 2013 55 Tufton Street London SW1P 3QL Civitas is a registered charity (no. 1085494) and a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales (no. 04023541) email: [email protected] Independence: Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society is a registered educational charity (No. 1085494) and a company limited by guarantee (No. 04023541). Civitas is financed from a variety of private sources to avoid over-reliance on any single or small group of donors. All the Institute’s publications seek to further its objective of promoting the advancement of learning. The views expressed are those of the authors, not of the Institute. i Contents Acknowledgements ii Foreword, David Green iii Executive Summary iv Background 1 Introduction 3 Chapter One – Trade 9 Chapter Two – City Regulation 18 Chapter Three – Options for Britain 26 Chapter Four – Common Fisheries Policy 42 Chapter Five – National Borders and Immigration 49 Chapter Six – Foreign & Security Policy 58 Chapter Seven – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) 68 Conclusion 80 Bibliography 81 ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Tamara Chehayeb Makarem and Susan Gaskarth for their support during the compilation of this paper and Dr David Green and Jonathan Lindsell of Civitas for their comments on the text. iii Foreword Our main aim should be the full return of our powers of self-government, but that can’t happen before the referendum promised for 2017. -
Smart Border Management: Indian Coastal and Maritime Security
Contents Foreword p2/ Preface p3/ Overview p4/ Current initiatives p12/ Challenges and way forward p25/ International examples p28/Sources p32/ Glossary p36/ FICCI Security Department p38 Smart border management: Indian coastal and maritime security September 2017 www.pwc.in Dr Sanjaya Baru Secretary General Foreword 1 FICCI India’s long coastline presents a variety of security challenges including illegal landing of arms and explosives at isolated spots on the coast, infiltration/ex-filtration of anti-national elements, use of the sea and off shore islands for criminal activities, and smuggling of consumer and intermediate goods through sea routes. Absence of physical barriers on the coast and presence of vital industrial and defence installations near the coast also enhance the vulnerability of the coasts to illegal cross-border activities. In addition, the Indian Ocean Region is of strategic importance to India’s security. A substantial part of India’s external trade and energy supplies pass through this region. The security of India’s island territories, in particular, the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, remains an important priority. Drug trafficking, sea-piracy and other clandestine activities such as gun running are emerging as new challenges to security management in the Indian Ocean region. FICCI believes that industry has the technological capability to implement border management solutions. The government could consider exploring integrated solutions provided by industry for strengthening coastal security of the country. The FICCI-PwC report on ‘Smart border management: Indian coastal and maritime security’ highlights the initiatives being taken by the Central and state governments to strengthen coastal security measures in the country. -
The Politics Behind the Ebola Crisis
The Politics Behind the Ebola Crisis Africa Report N°232 | 28 October 2015 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Pre-epidemic Situation ..................................................................................................... 3 A. Liberia ........................................................................................................................ 4 B. Sierra Leone ............................................................................................................... 5 C. Guinea ........................................................................................................................ 7 III. How Misinformation, Mistrust and Myopia Amplified the Crisis ................................... 8 A. Misinformation and Hesitation ................................................................................. 8 B. Extensive Delay and its Implications ........................................................................ 9 C. Quarantine and Containment ................................................................................... -
OPENING PANDORA's BOX David Cameron's Referendum Gamble On
OPENING PANDORA’S BOX David Cameron’s Referendum Gamble on EU Membership Credit: The Economist. By Christina Hull Yale University Department of Political Science Adviser: Jolyon Howorth April 21, 2014 Abstract This essay examines the driving factors behind UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s decision to call a referendum if the Conservative Party is re-elected in 2015. It addresses the persistence of Euroskepticism in the United Kingdom and the tendency of Euroskeptics to generate intra-party conflict that often has dire consequences for Prime Ministers. Through an analysis of the relative impact of political strategy, the power of the media, and British public opinion, the essay argues that addressing party management and electoral concerns has been the primary influence on David Cameron’s decision and contends that Cameron has unwittingly unleashed a Pandora’s box that could pave the way for a British exit from the European Union. Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank the Bates Summer Research Fellowship, without which I would not have had the opportunity to complete my research in London. To Professor Peter Swenson and the members of The Senior Colloquium, Gabe Botelho, Josh Kalla, Gabe Levine, Mary Shi, and Joel Sircus, who provided excellent advice and criticism. To Professor David Cameron, without whom I never would have discovered my interest in European politics. To David Fayngor, who flew halfway across the world to keep me company during my summer research. To my mom for her unwavering support and my dad for his careful proofreading. And finally, to my adviser Professor Jolyon Howorth, who worked with me on this project for over a year and a half. -
The French White Paper on Defence and National Security (2008) 3
FRENCH DEFENCE 2009 Texts and exercises by Philippe Rostaing : 1. French Defence Organization 2. French Defence Policy : the French White Paper on Defence and National Security (2008) 3. The French Army 4. The French Air Force 5. The French Navy 6. The French Gendarmerie 7. Intelligence and the French Intelligence Community Update : March 2009 1 1. French Defence Organization Read this text carefully. You will then be able to do the following exercises : President of the French Republic Prime Minister Defence Minister Armed Forces Chief of Staff Army Chief Air Force Navy Chief Gendarmerie of Staff Chief of of Staff Director- Staff General 1. The Constitution of October 4th,1958, gives the President of the French Republic the position of Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces (Article 15). In his capacity as guarantor of national independence, territorial integrity and treaty compliance (Article 5), he alone may decide to commit nuclear forces. Within specific councils under his authority (the Council of Ministers, the Defence Council), the President defines national defence policies and makes decisions in defence matters. He is responsible for appointing senior civilian and military officials (Article 13). 2. The French government determines and executes national policies and thus may use armed force (Article 20). The Prime Minister has responsibility for national defence. He implements the decisions made by the President and is supported by the General Secretariat for National Defence (SGDN) in charge of interdepartmental defence coordination. 3. The Defence Minister has authority over the Ministry of Defence and executes military defence policies. He reports directly to the Prime Minister. -
Academic Studies for Officers
University VIENNA and National Defense Academy VIENNA Academic Studies for Officers A Central European Perspective (Presentations of the First International Conference in Vienna, 15 – 19 March 1999) Published by Brigadier-General Gernot ALBRECHT Vienna, April 2001 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS WOLFGANG GREISENEGGER..................................................3 Welcome Address......................................................................................3 ERNEST KÖNIG..........................................................................5 Welcome Address......................................................................................5 GERNOT ALBRECHT .................................................................9 Opening Statement....................................................................................9 ARMIN A. STEINKAMM ............................................................10 The Bundeswehr University [UDBW]..................................................10 JÖRG E. P. KELLER.................................................................17 Academic Officer Training within and for the Armed Forces – a German Perspective ....................................................................................................................17 BEAT A. KÄCH .........................................................................32 The Swiss Military College ....................................................................32 ALTERO FASANO.....................................................................43 -
De Noordzee Moet Een Baken Van Vrijhandel Blijven, Ropa, Staat Sterk Onder Druk
L R Liberaal Reveil Liberaal Liberaal Reveil LR 4 De Noordzee moet een baken ‘‘ van vrijhandel blijven, met de maritieme blik op de wereld. Er is geen enkele economische reden om eeuwenoude handelstradities rondom de Noordzee te ontwrichten, 57 e december 2016 alleen omdat Brussel boos is december 2016 (4) jaargang, ,, Thema: Brexit Derk Jan Eppink Het correspondents dinner in de politieke communicatie De verengelsing van Nederlandse universiteiten 57e jaargang, december 2016 (4) Liberaal Reveil is een uitgave van de Prof.mr. B.M. TeldersStichting LR INHOUDSOPGAVE COLOFON LR LR Liberaal Reveil is een uitgave van de Prof.mr. B.M. TeldersStichting Ten geleide: dan liever het net op! 181 Redactie prof.dr. M.L.J. Wissenburg (voorzitter) Column: het Trilemma mw. drs. F.D. de Beaufort Roelof Salomons 182 dr. C.F. van den Berg prof.dr. R.M. Salomons Thema: Brexit dr. B. Steunenberg drs. D.P. Turk (eindredacteur) Voorwoord Redactieadres 183 Mauritskade 21 2514 HD Den Haag Nederland en Brexit telefoon: 070-3631948 Derk Jan Eppink 184 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.teldersstichting.nl Van Brexit tot soevereiniteit: over de noodzaak van een liberaal antwoord op maatschappelijk onbehagen Auteursrechten Philip van Veller 189 De auteursrechten liggen bij de uitgever. De vetgedrukte inleidingen bij de artikelen zijn opgesteld door de redactie, De verloren vader keert terug naar zijn kroost. Kan de Europese Vrijhandelsassociatie een oplossing bieden niet door de auteur(s). Schrijven in Liberaal Reveil geschiedt altijd op persoonlijke titel. voor Britse relaties met Europa in een post-Brexit periode? ISSN 0167-0883 Nathan Benit 201 Abonnementenadministratie Mauritskade 21 Koester Brits verzet tegen Europese militaire integratie 2514 HD Den Haag Daniël Turk 209 telefoon: 070-3631948 [email protected] Abonnementen Who’s afraid of humor in politics? Het correspondents dinner in de politieke communicatie Een papieren abonnement op Liberaal Reveil (4 nummers) kost €34,- euro per jaar (buitenland: €44,-). -
Defence Policy in the Italian Republic: Frames and Issues
UNISCI Discussion Papers, Nº 25 (January / Enero 2011) ISSN 1696-2206 DEFENCE POLICY IN THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC: FRAMES AND ISSUES Nicola Labanca 1 University of Siena Abstract: The article focuses on the civil-military relations in Republican Italy. The new democratic model of relations between the political authorities and the military had a strong continuity in the past. Also, in the new Republic the Armed Forces enjoyed a large degree of autonomy. Different phases can be identified in the history of Italian defence policy. In the reconstruction phase (1945-48), the General Staff decided to have again a big Army, based more on quantity than quality. The membership of NATO and the hardest period of the Cold War (1949-53) greatly accelerated the transformation of Italian Armed Forces. Some scepticism against limitations that NATO posed to national autonomy were overcome by the consciousness that the Alliance provided conspicuous means and allowed to abolish the military limitations of the 1947 Peace Treaty. In the years 1954-62, the Armed Forces had to scale down previous expectations, but at the same time, modernized quickly thanks to US aid. The Army was the first beneficiary, then the Air Force and finally (in 1958) the Navy. This was for two reasons: the Navy was the service in best conditions at the end of the war, while Soviet threat in the Mediterranean was at a low level. However, the Army still relied mainly on numbers, with a low number of armoured and motorized units. In these years, Italy also inaugurated its nuclear military policy. From the mid 1960s to the mid 1970s, the Armed Forces started a “ristrutturazione” (“restructuration”) required by the new NATO strategy of flexible response, which accelerated in the years 1975-78. -
2006 Budgetary Procedure 4
2006 BUDGETARY PROCEDURE Doc No: 4: (3) ******* 29.09.2005 COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS RAPPORTEURS: GIOVANNI PITTELLA - SECTION III (COMMISSION) VALDIS DOMBROVSKIS - OTHER SECTIONS PARLIAMENT - 1st READING Amendments submitted to the meeting of the Committee on Budgets of 4, 5 and 6 October 2005 EN EN Draft amendment 0066 === FEMM/6590=== Budget reference line : 17 03 01 01 << Tabled by Katerina Batzeli, Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality >> ------------------------------- Volume 4 (section 3) — Commission Item 17 03 01 01 Public health (2003 to 2008) Amend remarks as follows: 17 03 01 01 Budget 2005 PDB 2006 DB 2006 AMENDMENT DB+AMENDMENT Commitments Payments Commitments Payments Commitments Payments Commitments Payments Commitments Payments Appropriations 51 300 000 51 895 000 51 500 000 51 457 644 51 500 000 51 457 644 51 500 000 51 457 644 Reserves Heading: Public health (2003 to 2008) Remarks: After paragraph The aim of the new programme of Community action in ..........illness and diseases, and obviating sources of danger to health. Amend text as follows: Its three main priorities are: — to improve information and knowledge for the development of public health and the strengthening and maintenance of effective health interventions and efficient health systems, by developing and operating a well-structured and comprehensive system for collecting, analysing, evaluating and imparting health information and knowledge to competent authorities, health professionals and the public, and by undertaking assessments of and reporting -
1 February 10, 2021 the Honorable Paolo Gentiloni European
February 10, 2021 The Honorable Paolo Gentiloni European Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs European Commission Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Belgium Re: Comments on the Inception Impact Assessment on the EU Digital Levy Dear Commissioner Gentiloni, This letter is in response to the European Commission’s request for comments from interested stakeholder groups on its Inception Impact Assessment on the Digital Levy initiative dated January 14, 2021 (the IIA). USCIB1 is a business association stakeholder and appreciates this opportunity to offer comments on this phase of the project. We have been following closely the evolution of the concept of the digital levy as a new own resources option since it was introduced into discussion last July. Our preliminary comments regarding the digital levy concept are based on our review of the IIA and earlier Commission documents. We urge the EU to continue its work within the principles established by the Inclusive Framework on BEPS and not focus on additional taxes or levies on digital activities of multinational enterprises (MNEs) as a targeted source of own resources revenue. A digital levy, if enacted, will create tension between governments and additional burdens and complexities for taxpayers. We are therefore opposed to a digital levy option if it is in conflict with those principles and it targets nonresident digital MNEs. In this letter, we summarize the context in which the digital levy has emerged and note the clear contradiction with the work of the Inclusive Framework. Introduction To date, there is little detail (or guidance) from the EU on the design of a digital levy. -
Understanding the Spitzenkandidaten Process
BRIEFING Election of the President of the European Commission Understanding the Spitzenkandidaten process SUMMARY The European Parliament has long sought to ensure that, by voting in European elections, European citizens not only elect the Parliament itself, but also have a say over who would head the EU executive – the European Commission. What became known as the 'Spitzenkandidaten process' is a procedure whereby European political parties, ahead of European elections, appoint lead candidates for the role of Commission President, with the presidency of the Commission then going to the candidate of the political party capable of marshalling sufficient parliamentary support. The Parliament remains firmly committed to repeating the process in 2019 and, with EP elections now only weeks away, attention has shifted to the European political parties. A number of parties have nominated lead candidates, and this briefing gives an overview of their nominees, as well as looking more broadly at the process. This is a revised and further updated edition of an earlier briefing; previous edition from February 2019. Lead candidates of the six European political parties due to participate in the Eurovision debate, to be held in Parliament’s Brussels hemicycle, on 15 May 2019. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Laura Tilindyte Members' Research Service PE 630.264 – April 2019 EN EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service The 2019 elections: European political parties It is widely acknowledged that the European political parties will play a crucial role for the future of the Spitzenkandidaten procedure. In this respect, commentators consistently point to the daunting and, before 2014, unprecedented challenge of a multilingual, continent-wide campaign in 27 or 28 countries, each with their own political culture and sensitivities.1 The Commission has made recommendations (February 2018) in this regard, suggesting, for example, earlier selection of the lead candidates (ideally by the end of 2018), leaving more time for the campaign.