DOCSLIB.ORG

HOMING and SPATIAL USE of GAG GROUPER, Mycteroperca Microlepis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HOMING and SPATIAL USE of GAG GROUPER, Mycteroperca Microlepis HOMING AND SPATIAL USE OF GAG GROUPER, Mycteroperca microlepis By BRIAN L. KIEL A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2004 Copyright 2004 by Brian L. Kiel To my parents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am very grateful to my wife, Patricia Mergo, for her love, patience, and support. It’s been a journey and during this work-in-progress, my two children, Casey and Kaitlyn were born. I have truly enjoyed my time spent with them as a stay-at-home father as I have come to learn about the important things in life. I would also like to thank my chairman, Dr. William J. Lindberg, for his patience, advice, constructive criticism, and offshore and financial support. Many thanks also go to the members of my committee, Drs. Debra Murie and Tom Frazer, for their patience, advice, and critical review that were necessary to help guide me to this point. I thank Dr. Chris Sistrom of the U.F. Shands Hospital, Radiology Department, for statistical advice and expertise. To Loren Kellogg, Jim Loftin, Jason Hale, and Allen Heck, I also owe a great deal of gratitude for the long field days they endured to help complete this project. Financial assistance was also provided by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Marine Resources Grants Program (Grant No. MR-073), and the National Marine Fisheries Service MARFIN Program (Grant No. NA57FF0288). iv TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... viii ABSTRACT.........................................................................................................................x CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS .................................................................................8 Suwannee Regional Reef System (SRRS)....................................................................8 Study Design.................................................................................................................8 Telemetry Equipment and Tagging Methods .............................................................10 Telemetry Relocation Techniques ..............................................................................12 Gag Spatial Utilization ...............................................................................................13 Individual Displacements of Ultrasonically Tagged Gag...........................................13 Mass Displacement Experiments................................................................................14 FLOY Tagging ....................................................................................................14 Fish Traps and Trapping......................................................................................14 Mass Displacement Trials ...................................................................................15 U/W Surveys .......................................................................................................16 Statistical Analysis ..............................................................................................16 3 RESULTS...................................................................................................................19 Gag Spatial Utilization ...............................................................................................19 Hourly Tracking ..................................................................................................21 Tracking session #1......................................................................................22 Tracking session # 2.....................................................................................23 Tracking session # 3.....................................................................................24 Individual Displacements of Ultrasonically Tagged Gag...........................................25 Mass Displacement Experiments and U/W Surveys ..................................................31 Trial 1: 3000 and 4000 Meter Displacements .....................................................32 v Trial 2: 2000 and 3000 Meter Displacement.......................................................33 Combined Trials ..................................................................................................34 4 DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................61 Spatial Utilization .......................................................................................................61 Adaptive Significance.................................................................................................63 Homing Mechanisms..................................................................................................65 Fisheries Management Implications...........................................................................67 Future Work................................................................................................................68 LITERATURE CITED ......................................................................................................70 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .............................................................................................79 vi LIST OF TABLES Table page 1 Marine teleosts that are believed to possess homing ability. .....................................4 2 Relocation summary of 5 gag tagged with internally placed ultrasonic tags...........19 3 Relocation summary of 9 gag tagged with externally placed ultrasonic tags. .........20 4 Gag sizes and dates tracked......................................................................................21 5 Summary of diel tracking of ultrasonically tagged gag. ..........................................22 6 Summaries of displacement distances and homing success.....................................26 7 Homing status and size of individually displaced gag. ............................................27 8 Gag displacement distances, averages and range of sizes........................................32 9 Gag size categorized by mass displaced fish from both trials..................................33 10 Parameter estimates for the significant regression equation: ...................................35 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 1 Map of Florida showing the mouth of the Suwannee River ....................................17 2 A Suwannee Regional Reef System (SRRS) array. .................................................18 3 Relocations of gag # 365..........................................................................................36 4 Relocations of gag # 456..........................................................................................37 5 Relocations of gag # 338..........................................................................................38 6 Relocations of gag # 2435........................................................................................39 7 First hourly tracking session of two gag, # 2435 and # 02.......................................40 8 Second hourly tracking session of gag # 2435.........................................................41 9 Third hourly tracking session of one gag, # 15........................................................42 10 1000 meter displacement of gag # 10.......................................................................43 11 2000 meter displacement of gag # 11.......................................................................44 12 3000 meter displacement of gag # 15.......................................................................45 13 3000 meter displacement of gag #17........................................................................46 14 Relocations of gag # 01............................................................................................47 15 233 meter displacement of gag # 05.........................................................................48 16 300 meter displacement of gag # 07.........................................................................49 17 300 meter displacement of gag # 06.........................................................................50 18 450 meter displacement of gag # 08.........................................................................51 19 Relocations of gag # 08............................................................................................52 20 600 meter displacement of gag # 09.........................................................................53 viii 21 1000 meter displacement of gag # 03.......................................................................54 22 Relocations of gag # 15............................................................................................55 23 Relocations of gag # 17............................................................................................56 24 4000 meter displacement of gag # 13.......................................................................57 25 4000 meter displacement of gag # 18.......................................................................58
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modeling Gag Grouper (Mycteroperca Microlepis
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2009 Modeling gag grouper (Mycteroperca microlepis) in the Gulf of Mexico: exploring the impact of marine reserves on the population dynamics of a protogynous grouper Robert D. Ellis Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Ellis, Robert D., "Modeling gag grouper (Mycteroperca microlepis) in the Gulf of Mexico: exploring the impact of marine reserves on the population dynamics of a protogynous grouper" (2009). LSU Master's Theses. 4146. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4146 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MODELING GAG GROUPER (MYCTEROPERCA MICROLEPIS) IN THE GULF OF MEXICO: EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF MARINE RESERVES ON THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF A PROTOGYNOUS GROUPER A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences by Robert D. Ellis B.S., University of California Santa Barbara, 2004 August 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the State of Louisiana Board of Regents for funding this research with an 8G Fellowship. My research and thesis were greatly improved by the comments and assistance of many people, first among them my advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet Composition of Juvenile Black Grouper (Mycteroperca Bonaci) from Coastal Nursery Areas of the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 77(3): 441–452, 2005 NOTE DIET COMPOSITION OF JUVENILE BLACK GROUPER (MYCTEROPERCA BONACI) FROM COASTAL NURSERY AREAS OF THE YUCATÁN PENINSULA, MEXICO Thierry Brulé, Enrique Puerto-Novelo, Esperanza Pérez-Díaz, and Ximena Renán-Galindo Groupers (Epinephelinae, Epinephelini) are top-level predators that influence the trophic web of coral reef ecosystems (Parrish, 1987; Heemstra and Randall, 1993; Sluka et al., 2001). They are demersal mesocarnivores and stalk and ambush preda- tors that sit and wait for larger moving prey such as fish and mobile invertebrates (Cailliet et al., 1986). Groupers contribute to the ecological balance of complex tropi- cal hard-bottom communities (Sluka et al., 1994), and thus large changes in their populations may significantly alter other community components (Parrish, 1987). The black grouper (Mycteroperca bonaci Poey, 1860) is an important commercial and recreational fin fish resource in the western Atlantic region (Bullock and Smith, 1991; Heemstra and Randall, 1993). The southern Gulf of Mexico grouper fishery is currently considered to be deteriorated and M. bonaci, along with red grouper (Epinephelus morio Valenciennes, 1828) and gag (Mycteroperca microlepis Goode and Bean, 1880), is one of the most heavily exploited fish species in this region (Co- lás-Marrufo et al., 1998; SEMARNAP, 2000). Currently, M. bonaci is considered a threatened species (Morris et al., 2000; IUCN, 2003) and has been classified as vul- nerable in U.S. waters because male biomass in the Atlantic dropped from 20% in 1982 to 6% in 1995 (Musick et al., 2000). The black grouper is usually found on irregular bottoms such as coral reefs, drop- off walls, and rocky ledges, at depths from 10 to 100 m (Roe, 1977; Manooch and Mason, 1987; Bullock and Smith, 1991; Heemstra and Randall, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • 011706 Status Report on the Goliath Grouper
    Status report on the continental United States distinct population segment of the goliath grouper (Epinephelus itajara) January 2006 National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office 263 13th Avenue South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge and appreciate the efforts of all who contributed to the contents of this report. In particular, we wish to recognize Lew Bullock, Felicia Coleman, Chris Koenig, and Rich McBride for reviewing the draft document. The participation and considerable contributions to the contents of the report by Andy Strelcheck and Peter Hood are also greatly appreciated. The team responsible for compiling this report included: Michael Barnette, Stephania Bolden, Jennifer Moore, Clay Porch, Jennifer Schull, and Phil Steele. This document should be cited as: NMFS. 2006. Status report on the continental United States distinct population segment of the goliath grouper (Epinephelus itajara). January 12, 2006. 49 pp. Cover: goliath grouper illustration courtesy of Diane Peebles. ii Table of Contents List of Tables.................................................................................................................... iv Abbreviations and Acronyms ......................................................................................... vi Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Assemblages Associated with Red Grouper Pits at Pulley Ridge, A
    419 Abstract—Red grouper (Epineph- elus morio) modify their habitat by Fish assemblages associated with red grouper excavating sediment to expose rocky pits, providing structurally complex pits at Pulley Ridge, a mesophotic reef in the habitat for many fish species. Sur- Gulf of Mexico veys conducted with remotely op- erated vehicles from 2012 through 2015 were used to characterize fish Stacey L. Harter (contact author)1 assemblages associated with grouper Heather Moe1 pits at Pulley Ridge, a mesophotic 2 coral ecosystem and habitat area John K. Reed of particular concern in the Gulf Andrew W. David1 of Mexico, and to examine whether invasive species of lionfish (Pterois Email address for contact author: [email protected] spp.) have had an effect on these as- semblages. Overall, 208 grouper pits 1 Southeast Fisheries Science Center were examined, and 66 fish species National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA were associated with them. Fish as- 3500 Delwood Beach Road semblages were compared by using Panama City, Florida 32408 several factors but were considered 2 Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute to be significantly different only on Florida Atlantic University the basis of the presence or absence 5600 U.S. 1 North of predator species in their pit (no Fort Pierce, Florida 34946 predators, lionfish only, red grou- per only, or both lionfish and red grouper). The data do not indicate a negative effect from lionfish. Abun- dances of most species were higher in grouper pits that had lionfish, and species diversity was higher in grouper pits with a predator (lion- The red grouper (Epinephelus morio) waters (>70 m) of the shelf edge and fish, red grouper, or both).
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 573:215
    This authors' personal copy may not be publicly or systematically copied or distributed, or posted on the Open Web, except with written permission of the copyright holder(s). It may be distributed to interested individuals on request. Vol. 573: 215–228, 2017 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published June 21 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12164 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Diet shifts in a native mesopredator across a range of invasive lionfish biomass Joseph S. Curtis1,*, Kara R. Wall1, Mark A. Albins2, Christopher D. Stallings1 1College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33705, USA 2University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36608, USA ABSTRACT: In marine ecosystems, little is known about how competition with invasive fishes may affect the resource use of native predators. Throughout the western Atlantic, invasive Indo-Pacific lionfishes (Pterois spp.) are likely to compete with native mesopredators such as the graysby Cephalopholis cruentata, an ecologically similar serranid. In conjunction with a before-after- control- impact lionfish removal experiment, this study measured whether graysby population size, diet, and condition varied in relation to cohabitant lionfish biomass. Lionfish, graysby, and prey popu- lations were surveyed and sampled along a contiguous reef ledge in Biscayne National Park, south Florida. Mesopredator diet was measured with stable isotope (δ13C and δ15N) and gut con- tent analyses, and isotopic niches were used to compare patterns of inter- and intraspecific resource use diversity. The isotopic niches of graysby and lionfishes overlapped by 67%, suggest- ing similar population-level resource use. On sites with higher lionfish biomass, graysby isotopic niche was 34% smaller and overlapped 47% less with that of lionfishes, possibly indicating both a narrower breadth of resource use and associated interspecific niche segregation.
    [Show full text]
  • Age, Growth and Reproduction of the Galapagos Sailfin Grouper [I
    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 17 September 2015. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/1270), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Usseglio P, Friedlander AM, DeMartini EE, Schuhbauer A, Schemmel E, Salinas de Léon P. 2015. Improved estimates of age, growth and reproduction for the regionally endemic Galapagos sailfin grouper Mycteroperca olfax (Jenyns, 1840) PeerJ 3:e1270 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1270 Age, growth and reproduction of the Galapagos sailfin grouper Mycteroperca olfax (Jenyns, 1840): an overdue and needed comprehensive baseline Paolo Usseglio, Alan M. Friedlander, Edward E. DeMartini, Anna Schuhbauer, Pelayo Salinas de Léon The Galapagos Sailfin grouper, Mycteroperca olfax, locally known as bacalao and listed as vulnerable by IUCN, is culturally, economically, and ecologically important to the Galapagos archipelago and its people. It is regionally endemic to the Eastern Tropical Pacific, and, while an important fishery resource that has shown substantial declines in recent years, to date no effective management regulations are in place to ensure the sustainability of its Galapagos fishery. Previous estimates of longevity and size of maturity for bacalao are inconsistent with estimates for congeners, which questions the accuracy of PrePrints prior estimates. We set out to rigorously assess the age, growth, and reproductive biology of bacalao in order to provide more accurate life history information to inform more effective fisheries management for this species. The oldest fish in our sample was 24 years old, which is 2-3 times greater than previously reported estimates of longevity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycteroperca Phenax) Life History for the Gulf of Mexico
    Summary Table of Scamp, (Mycteroperca phenax) life history for the Gulf of Mexico. Associations and interactions with environmental and habitat variables are listed with citations. Trophic relationships Habitat Associations and Interactions Life Stage Season Location Temp(oC) Salinity(ppt) Oxygen Depth(m) Food Predators Habitat Selection Growth Mortality Production Eggs Spring Offshore Pelagic Citation 1 1 9 Larvae Spring Offshore Pelagic Citation 1 1 9 Early and About 12 to 33 m Inshore hard Late bottoms and reefs Juveniles Citation 11 5,11 Adults Widely distributed 14-28 C 12-189m; most are Predominately Sharks and other Ledges and high- Reach maximum Catch and release on shelf areas of captured at 40-80 fishes; also large fishes relief hard bottoms; size slowly mortality reported Gulf, especially off m crustaceans and prefer complex for scamp taken of Florida cephalopods structures such as from depths Oculina coral reefs greater than 44 m. Repopulation of overfished sites is slow Citation 1,3,5 8 1,8 1,7 5 1,4,5 7 6,10 Scamp, (Mycteroperca phenax) cont. Trophic relationships Habitat Associations and Interactions Life Stage Season Location Temp(oC) Salinity(ppt) Oxygen Depth(m) Food Predators Habitat Selection Growth Mortality Production Spawning Protogynous Absent from 60-100 m Prefer to spawn at Fishing pressure Availability of Adults hermaphrodite; spawning shelf edge habitat may reduce shelf edge, spawn from grounds below of maximum proportion of males especially late Feb. to 8.6 C; most complexity; Oculina in population Oculina, habitat early June in spawning activity formations a key may be important Gulf; April- occurs above spawning habitat factor Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • FAU Institutional Repository
    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: ©1992 Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami. This manuscript is available at http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/bms and may be cited as: Gilmore, R.G. & Jones, R. S. (1992). Color variation and associated behavior in the epinepheline groupers, Mycteroperca microlepis (Goode and Bean) and M. phenax Jordan and Swain. Bulletin of Marine Science, 51(1), 83-103. BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 51(1): 83-103,1992 CORAL REEF PAPER COLOR VARIATION AND ASSOCIATED BEHAVIOR IN THE EPINEPHELINE GROUPERS, MYCTEROPERCA MICROLEPIS (GOODE AND BEAN) AND M. PHENAX JORDAN AND SWAIN R. Grant Gilmore and Robert S. Jones ABSTRACT Color variants and behavior of scamp, Mycteroperca phenax. and gag, M, microlepis, are described from 64 submersible dives made on reef structures at depths between 20 and 100 m off the east coast of Florida from February 1977 to September 1982. These dives yielded 146 h of observations augmented with video and 35 mm photography. Both species display a variety of color phases associated with social behavior. They are expressed in each case by an aggressive, dominant territorial individual which displays to a group of smaller subor- dinates. Social hierarchy is evident in both species, with the alpha individual being a male in the gag and of undetermined sex in the scamp. Although actual spawning was not docu- mented, hierarchical behavior and displays are interpreted as courtship associated with spawn- ing activity. Courtship is further implied based on the similarity of these behaviors to those recorded for a variety of other fishes including serranids.
    [Show full text]
  • Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015
    Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Patrícia Amorim | Fishery Analyst, Systems Division | [email protected] Megan Westmeyer | Fishery Analyst, Strategy Communications and Analyze Division | [email protected] CITATION Amorim, P. and M. Westmeyer. 2016. Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015. Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation. 18 pp. Available from www.fishsource.com. PHOTO CREDITS left: Image courtesy of Pedro Veiga (Pedro Veiga Photography) right: Image courtesy of Pedro Veiga (Pedro Veiga Photography) © Sustainable Fisheries Partnership February 2016 KEYWORDS Developing countries, FAO, fisheries, grouper, improvements, seafood sector, small-scale fisheries, snapper, sustainability www.sustainablefish.org i Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The goal of this report is to provide a brief overview of the current status and trends of the snapper and grouper seafood sector, as well as to identify the main gaps of knowledge and highlight areas where improvements are critical to ensure long-term sustainability. Snapper and grouper are important fishery resources with great commercial value for exporters to major international markets. The fisheries also support the livelihoods and food security of many local, small-scale fishing communities worldwide. It is therefore all the more critical that management of these fisheries improves, thus ensuring this important resource will remain available to provide both food and income. Landings of snapper and grouper have been steadily increasing: in the 1950s, total landings were about 50,000 tonnes, but they had grown to more than 612,000 tonnes by 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Use of Roving Diver and Transect Surveys to Assess the Coral Reef Fish Assemblage Off Southeastern Hispaniola
    DOI 10.1007/s0033 8-002-0216-y Page 1 sur 1 Coral Reefs vdt L41z 14&-22Z Springer-Verlag 2002 DOI 10.1007/s00338-002-0216-y Report Evaluating the use of roving diver and transect surveys to assess the coral reef fish assemblage off southeastern Hispaniola E. F. Schmitt1 , 2 ' A R. D. Sluka1,3 and K. M. Sullivan-Sealey1 (1) Department of Biology and The Nature Conservancy, Florida and Caribbean Marine Conservation Science Center, University of Miami, P.O. Box 249118, Coral Gables, Florida 33124, USA (2) Present address : Math, Science and Technology Department, Nova Southeastern University, Farquhar Center for Undergraduate Studies, 3301 College Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33314-7796, USA, e-mail: [email protected], Tel.: +1-954-2628349 (3) Present address'. Center for Applied Science, PHRA No. 12, Pothujanam Road, Kumarapuram, Trivadrum, Kerala 695011, India Received: 4 January 1999 / Accepted: 12 November 2001 / Published online: 9 May 2002 Abstract. The relatively little-studied fish fauna off southeastern Hispaniola was rapidly assessed using a combination of visual survey techniques including transects and roving diver surveys. It was found that when combined, both methods provided a more complete overall species assessment than either method was able to provide in isolation. Being able to conduct rapid species assessments is becoming increasingly more important as a conservation tool. Data on species composition, sighting frequency, and abundance of all fishes were collected using both methods. Abundance was recorded in four logarithmic-based categories (roving diver method) while the number of fishes were counted within 40-m transects (transect method). Both methods were similar in recording the most abundant species, while a greater number of rare species (especially fishery-targeted species) were recorded with the roving diver method.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Demographic Parameter Synthesis for Exploited Florida and Caribbean Coral Reef Fishes
    Please do not remove this page Life history demographic parameter synthesis for exploited Florida and Caribbean coral reef fishes Stevens, Molly H; Smith, Steven Glen; Ault, Jerald Stephen https://scholarship.miami.edu/discovery/delivery/01UOML_INST:ResearchRepository/12378179400002976?l#13378179390002976 Stevens, M. H., Smith, S. G., & Ault, J. S. (2019). Life history demographic parameter synthesis for exploited Florida and Caribbean coral reef fishes. Fish and Fisheries (Oxford, England), 20(6), 1196–1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12405 Published Version: https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12405 Downloaded On 2021/09/28 21:22:59 -0400 Please do not remove this page Received: 11 April 2019 | Revised: 31 July 2019 | Accepted: 14 August 2019 DOI: 10.1111/faf.12405 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Life history demographic parameter synthesis for exploited Florida and Caribbean coral reef fishes Molly H. Stevens | Steven G. Smith | Jerald S. Ault Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Abstract Miami, FL, USA Age‐ or length‐structured stock assessments require reliable life history demo‐ Correspondence graphic parameters (growth, mortality, reproduction) to model population dynamics, Molly H. Stevens, Rosenstiel School of potential yields and stock sustainability. This study synthesized life history informa‐ Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, tion for 84 commercially exploited tropical reef fish species from Florida and the Miami, FL 33149, USA. U.S. Caribbean (Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands). We attempted to identify a Email: [email protected] useable set of life history parameters for each species that included lifespan, length Funding information at age, weight at length and maturity at length.
    [Show full text]
  • Saltwater Fish Identification Guide
    Identification Guide To South Carolina Fishes Inshore Fishes Red Drum (Spottail, redfish, channel bass, puppy drum,) Sciaenops ocellatus May have multiple spots along dorsal surface.. RKW Black Drum Pogonias cromis Broad black vertical bars along body. Barbells on chin. Spotted Seatrout (Winter trout, speckled trout) Cynoscion nebulosus Numerous distinct black spots on dorsal surface. Most commonly encountered in rivers and estuaries. RKW Most commonly encountered just offshore around live bottom and artificial reefs. Weakfish (Summer trout, Gray trout) Cynoscion regalis RKW Silver coloration with no spots. Large eye Silver Seatrout Cynoscion nothus RKW Spot Leiostomus xanthurus Distinct spot on shoulder. RKW Atlantic Croaker (Hardhead) Micropogonias undulatus RKW Silver Perch (Virginia Perch) Bairdiella chrysoura RKW Sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus Broad black vertical bars along body. RKW Pinfish (Sailors Choice) Lagodon rhomboides Distinct spot. RKW Southern Kingfish (Whiting) Menticirrhus americanus RKW Extended 1st dorsal filament Northern Kingfish SEAMAP- Menticirrhus saxatilis SA:RPW Dusky 1st dorsal-fin tip Black caudal fin tip Gulf Kingfish SEAMAP- Menticirrhus littoralis SA:RPW Southern flounder Paralichthys lethostigma No ocellated spots . RKW Summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus Five ocellated spots in this distinct pattern. B. Floyd Gulf flounder Paralichthys albigutta B. Floyd Three ocellated spots in a triangle pattern. B. Floyd Bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix RKW Inshore Lizardfish Synodus foetens RKW RKW Ladyfish Elops saurus Florida Pompano Trachinotus carolinus RKW Lookdown Selene vomer RKW Spadefish Chaetodipterus faber Juvenile RKW Juvenile spadefish are commonly found in SC estuaries. Adults, which look very similar to the specimen shown above, are common inhabitants of offshore reefs. Cobia Rachycentron canadum Adult D. Hammond Juvenile RKW D.
    [Show full text]