2016-17 Business Plan 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2016-17 Business Plan 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 2016-17 Business Plan 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Legislative Mandate ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Organization Profile ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.3 Metrolinx Quick Facts & Service Highlights ................................................................................... 7 2.0 Strategic Direction ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Advancing our Five Year Strategic Objectives ............................................................................... 9 3.0 Business Context 2016-17 .......................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Momentum from 2015-16 ............................................................................................................. 12 3.2 Business Scan: Challenges and Opportunities ............................................................................ 13 3.3 Regulatory Rail Issues and Initiatives .......................................................................................... 15 4.0 Financial Profile ........................................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Operating Budget ......................................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Capital Investment ........................................................................................................................ 18 4.3 Capital Asset Growth 2016-17 ..................................................................................................... 22 4.4 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Targets .......................................................................... 22 4.5 Financial Performance ................................................................................................................. 22 4.6 Implementing Cost Allocations ..................................................................................................... 32 4.7 Managing Uncertainty .................................................................................................................. 32 5.0 Joint Stakeholder Deliverables .................................................................................................. 34 5.1 Infrastructure Ontario (IO) ............................................................................................................ 34 5.2 Municipal Partners ........................................................................................................................ 34 5.3 Rail Partners (CN, CP, TTR, GEXR, VIA) .................................................................................... 35 5.4 Key Delivery Partners (Accenture, Bombardier, Crosslinx, Suncor, Pacific Northern Railworks (PNR)) ................................................................................................................................................ 35 6.0 Organizational Initiatives ............................................................................................................ 35 6.1 Fare Integration ............................................................................................................................ 35 6.2 Review of the Metrolinx Act .......................................................................................................... 36 6.3 Metrolinx Sustainability Strategy .................................................................................................. 36 6.4 Stakeholder Consultations ........................................................................................................... 37 7.0 GO Transit ..................................................................................................................................... 39 7.1 GO Transit Service Highlights ...................................................................................................... 39 7.2 GO Customer Service Strategy .................................................................................................... 40 7.3 GO Regional Express Rail (GO RER) .......................................................................................... 43 7.4 GO Expansion and Optimization .................................................................................................. 45 7.5 GO State Of Good Repair ............................................................................................................ 45 8.0 PRESTO ........................................................................................................................................ 46 8.1 PRESTO Customer Service Strategy .......................................................................................... 46 8.2 PRESTO Fare Card Highlights ..................................................................................................... 46 8.3 PRESTO Business Model and SP Engagement .......................................................................... 47 8.4 PRESTO State of Good Repair .................................................................................................... 48 9.0 UP Express ................................................................................................................................... 48 9.1 UP Express Service Highlights ..................................................................................................... 48 9.2 Fare Structure Changes ............................................................................................................... 50 9.3 UP State of Good Repair .............................................................................................................. 51 10.0 Rapid Transit .............................................................................................................................. 51 10.1 Regional Rapid Transit Expansion ............................................................................................. 51 10.2 Rapid Transit Projects Underway ............................................................................................... 52 10.3 Funding for Other Next Wave Projects ...................................................................................... 53 11.0 Regional Transportation Planning ........................................................................................... 53 11.1 Legislative Review of the Big Move ........................................................................................... 53 12.0 Transit Support .......................................................................................................................... 54 12.1 Smart Commute ......................................................................................................................... 54 13.0 Transit Procurement Initiative (TPI) ......................................................................................... 55 13.1 Transit Procurement Made Easy ................................................................................................ 55 14.0 Metrolinx Internal ....................................................................................................................... 56 2016-17 Business Plan 3 14.1 Business Planning Improvements .............................................................................................. 56 14.2 HR Profile ................................................................................................................................... 56 14.3 I&IT Profile .................................................................................................................................. 58 14.4 Communication Plan .................................................................................................................. 60 Appendix ............................................................................................................................................. 61 Key Assumptions ................................................................................................................................ 61 List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................. 64 2016-17 Business Plan 4 Executive Summary Metrolinx’s annual Business Plan for 2016-17 presents our strategic direction, business context, financial profile, priority initiatives and planned deliverables from all corners of our organization. Our vision, “to link communities across the region, creating connections that support sustainable growth and prosperity” is realized by how Metrolinx chooses to plan, build, operate and connect the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA). The annual Business Plan describes how Metrolinx will do this in 2016- 17, guided by the strategic frameworks of the 2015-2020 Five-Year Strategy and the 25- year Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The
Recommended publications
  • Regional Express Rail Update
    Clause 5 in Report No. 10 of Committee of the Whole was adopted by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on June 23, 2016 with the following additional recommendation: 3. Receipt of the memorandum from Daniel Kostopoulos, Commissioner of Transportation Services, dated June 22, 2016. 5 Regional Express Rail Update Committee of the Whole recommends adoption of the following recommendations contained in the report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services now follows: 1. Recommendations It is recommended that: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Committee of the Whole 1 June 9, 2016 Regional Express Rail Update 2. Purpose This report provides an update to Council on the Provincial Regional Express Rail (RER) Service Plan and associated staff activities as York Region’s response to the RER Service Plan to be implemented by the Province over the next 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Sep+10+Rail+Ex.Pdf
    Clause 4 in Report No. 13 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on September 24, 2015. 4 York Region’s Initial Response to Regional Express Rail Service Concept Committee of the Whole recommends: 1. Receipt of the presentation by Leslie Woo and James Purkis, Metrolinx. 2. Receipt of the deputation by Bryan Allen, resident of the Town of Newmarket, regarding train anti-whistling at rail crossings. 3. Receipt of the communication from Stephen D’Agostino, Thomson Rogers, on behalf of Colebay Investments Inc., Highcove Investments Inc., Firwood Holdings Inc., Major McCowan Developments Limited, Summerlane Realty Corp. and Brentwood Estates Inc., dated September 10, 2015. 4. Adoption of the following recommendations contained in the report dated August 31, 2015 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. Recommendations It is recommended that: 1. Council endorse the recommendations contained in the body of this report as the Region’s next steps to respond to the Province of Ontario’s plan to expand service on existing GO rail corridors under the concept plan referred to as Regional Express Rail. 2. The Regional Clerk forward this report to the Ontario Minister of Transportation, President and Chief Executive Officer of Metrolinx and Clerks of the local municipalities. Committee of the Whole 1 Transportation Services September 10, 2015 York Region’s Initial Response to Regional Express Rail Service Concept 2. Purpose The purpose of this report is to update Council on the Provincial GO Regional Express Rail (RER) Service Plan, respond to comments Council raised and to seek Council’s endorsement of the staff recommendations contained in this report as York Region’s initial response to the RER Service Plan as the Province moves forward with implementation of this project over the next 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The One Toronto Transit Plan the One Toronto Transit Plan
    THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN As Mayor, John Tory will make Toronto more liveable, affordable and functional. Public transit is at the heart of what it takes to improve Toronto in each of these areas. John Tory’s One Toronto Transit Plan is a collection of initiatives and public transit investments that will get our city moving in seven years, and provide relief to the Yonge-University-Spadina subway line. THE ONE TORONTO PLAN WILL: • Start construction of the Scarborough subway extension immediately. • Engage the City with the Government of Ontario’s and Metrolinx’s plans for Regional Express Rail (RER) – all-day, two-way surface subway service on existing GO track lines with new higher-speed vehicles . • Start with the SmartTrack line as the first RER project, providing 53 km of relief. The SmartTrack line will run from the Airport Corporate Centre in the west, down to Union Station and back up to Markham in the east, with 22 new station stops and four interchanges with the TTC rapid transit network. • Finance the City’s one third of the capital cost of the SmartTrack line without raising property taxes, using tax increment financing. • Provide new express bus services for a segment of travelers that can be moved much quicker if fewer stops are made en route. Examples, which have been discussed, include, Don Mills Road, Dufferin Street and Front Street/Liberty Village. THE ONE TORONTO TRANSIT PLAN BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH TORY’S ONE TORONTO TRANSIT RELIEF PLAN INCLUDE: • Bringing relief sooner, to more Torontonians, rather than just the downtown- concentrated proposals of other candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Screen Report
    Lincolnville Go Station Improvements: Cultural Heritage Screening Report Prepared for: Metrolinx 20 Bay Street, Suite 1800 Toronto ON M5J 2W3 ~ METROLINX Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 300W-675 Cochrane Drive Markham ON L3R 0B8 () Stantec File No. 1135200010 October 12, 2017 LINCOLNVILLE GO STATION IMPROVEMENTS: CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING REPORT Project Personnel EA Project Manager: Alex Blasko, B.Sc. (Hon.) Heritage Consultant: Heidy Schopf, MES, CAHP Task Manager: Meaghan Rivard, MA, CAHP Report Writer: Heidy Schopf, MES, CAHP Laura Walter, MA GIS Specialist: Sean Earles Office Assistants: Carol Naylor Quality Review: Meaghan Rivard, MA, CAHP Independent Review: Tracie Carmichael, BA, B. Ed. () Stantec Sign-off Sheet This document was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. (“Stantec”) for the account of Metrolinx (the “Client”). The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. The report has been prepared based, in part, on information provided by others as cited in the Reference section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and / or completeness of third party information. Prepared by (signature) Heidy Schopf, MES, CAHP Cultural Heritage Specialist Reviewed by (signature) Signed by Tracie Carmichael on behalf of: Meaghan Rivard,
    [Show full text]
  • Smarttrack Ridership Analysis: Project Final Report
    SMARTTRACK Research Report RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS Project Final Report Eric J. Miller, James Vaughan, Monika Nasterska June 2016 SMARTTRACK RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS PROJECT FINAL REPORT Prepared for the City Manager, City of Toronto by: Eric J. Miller, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering Director, Transportation Research Institute Research Director, Travel Modelling Group University of Toronto James Vaughan & Monika Nasterska Travel Modelling Group, University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute June, 2016 i Executive Summary Project Objectives On December 11, 2014, City Council directed the City Manager in consultation with the Province/Metrolinx to develop a work plan to undertake an accelerated review of the SmartTrack and RER plans. Council also directed the City Manager to retain the specialized services of the University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute (UTTRI) to support the planning analysis and required transit ridership modelling as a component of the overall review.1 On February 10, 2015, City Council considered the report EX2.2 SmartTrack Work Plan (2015- 2016), and approved the accelerated work plan for the review of SmartTrack.2 The UTTRI component of this work was to provide transit ridership estimates and other key network performance measures using the City’s new Regional Travel Demand Model (GTAModel Version 4.0) developed at the University of Toronto by UTTRI. As detailed in the final Terms of Reference for the UTTRI work, this work included: • Confirming the integrated RER and SmartTrack Service Concept to be modelled. • Completion and validation of a new travel demand model system to be used by the City of Toronto in this and similar studies of transit ridership and travel demand.
    [Show full text]
  • GO Transit's Deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan
    GO Transit’s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan GO Transit’s 2020 Service Plan describes GO’s commitment to customers, existing and new, Success… and challenge: Union Station. to provide a dramatically expanded interregional transit option that integrates fully with the About 95% of GO Train customers travel RTP rapid transit network, and addresses the future travel needs in the Greater Golden to or from Union Station. During the peak Horseshoe. Further analysis during the planning and design of individual services will detail the hour, 45,000 customers use GO Transit’s service outline presented here, and define the appropriate technology, rail corridor improve - seven tracks and six platforms – the most ments, bus priority measures, passenger facilities, fleet growth, operational growth, and other intensive use of a train station in North activities needed to build the service. America. GO Transit has invested in more stairways, passenger waiting areas, This 2020 Service Plan summarizes the frequency and extent of service to be offered on and communications systems to handle major corridors, and is consistent with the infrastructure improvements and technologies the growing traffic through this “mobility included in the Metrolinx RTP and GO Transit’s vision and objectives described above. hub.” The adjacent Union Station GO Bus The plan reflects a significantly more proactive approach to service development than the Terminal provides convenient access to incremental, business-case driven approach that has guided GO’s growth for the past 15 express “train-bus” service between Union years. GO Transit will provide an attractive travel option that will compete successfully with Station and GO stations when trains are not automobile use for peak and off-peak trips between Urban Growth Centres identified in scheduled to run.
    [Show full text]
  • Hi Kaitie; Based on My Experience Your Contact Lists Look Similar To
    From: Currie, Leslie (MTO) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: December-14-18 12:18 PM To: Katie Bright Cc: Leanna Burgess; Halim Abdihalim; Rupesh Udash; Simon Strauss Subject: RE: Two projects - request for feedback re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Hi Kaitie; Based on my experience your contact lists look similar to what I would develop at MTO As always, the final decision is up to Metrolinx, and should follow the advice of Metrolinx Legal Services Feel free to contact me if you have any further questions Leslie Currie Indigenous Liaison Phone: 416-235-5229 Cell: 647-274-8489 From: Katie Bright [mailto:Katie Bright@metrolinx com] Sent: December 14, 2018 10:38 AM To: Currie, Leslie (MTO) Cc: Leanna Burgess ; Halim Abdihalim ; Rupesh Udash ; Simon Strauss Subject: Two projects - request for feedback re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Hi Leslie, There are two projects that Metrolinx would appreciate your feedback on re: potentially interested Indigenous communities Below are project descriptions and the lists developed to date: Expansion of Milton GO Station, Redevelopment of Meadowvale GO Station, and Construction of the New Station Operations West Facility Metrolinx is currently completing environmental due diligence studies, including a Stage 1-2 archaeological assessment, for the Expansion of Milton GO Station, Redevelopment of Meadowvale GO Station, and Construction of the New Station Operations West Facility Attached is a study area figure – the study area falls within the Town of Milton and the
    [Show full text]
  • Go Bus Schedule Toronto Pearson to Hamilton
    Go Bus Schedule Toronto Pearson To Hamilton When Greggory wavers his larch scrounge not tacitly enough, is Andres fail-safe? Wavelike Morris sometimes crenels his alienist scienter and valorised so even! Pally Edgardo flagellated brutally and defensively, she diking her nites escalated cagily. There other go bus to toronto pearson hamilton schedule adjustments to niagara falls to pay the discretion of Get notified about this account information about schedules here is, go bus connections to get their content, overall still being finalized and cruise your privacy! What to do in Toronto? What Hamilton residents can expect on Tuesday moving to the red. There should be a large sign saying: Airport Bus Stop. The bus driver just came to stop and left. Unable to log in. Via Concourse whereas GO Train passengers follow the numbered green platform numbers. Ttc fare payment device or by continuing to know about how to mississauga lakefront promenade park, bus to go toronto pearson hamilton schedule and port elgin and beating the. David Williams says organizers of smaller gatherings should consult with their local public health unit. Passengers using the GO Transit bus to Pearson Airport should check with York Region Transit before parking overnight in the parking lot. Find the top charts for best books to read across all genres. Send your journey details. They are available for purchase each Wednesday, prior to the start of the new week, until the following Tuesday. WE SERVE: Athens, Columbus, Cleveland, Marietta, Parkersburg, Van Wert, Wooster and communities in between. Select UP Express Ticket Vending Machines at Union and Pearson Stations allow customers to purchase a PRESTO card, add value and check balance and account information.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station 2031 Opportunities and Demands Study Union Station 2031 Demands and Opportunities Study
    UNION STATION 2031 DEMANDS AND OPPORTUNITIESUNION STATION STUDY2031 OPPORTUNITIES AND DRAFTDEMANDS FINAL STUDY Fall 2012 March 2011 Union Station 2031 Demands and Opportunities Study Union Station 2031 Demands and Opportunities Study Fall 2012 Prepared for: Prepared by: Metrolinx Halcrow Consulting Inc 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 207 Queen’s Quay W Suite 550 Toronto ON M5J 2N8 Toronto, ON M5J 1A7 +1 416 363 8123 www.halcrow.com i Union Station 2031 Demands and Opportunities Study Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Related Initiatives .......................................................................................................... 3 2 Study Design Overview........................................................................ 5 3 Existing and Future Rail Travel Market Analysis ............................ 9 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 A.M. Peak Period GO Rail Ridership by GO Lines ..............................................10 3.3 A.M. Peak Period GO Rail Market Destined to PD 1 by Origin Regions ........11 3.4 A.M. Peak Period Passenger Egress Characteristics from Union Station
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: GO Transit Regional Express Rail Overview______
    Appendix 1: GO Transit Regional Express Rail Overview____________________________ APPENDIX 1 METROLINX GO TRANSIT REGIONAL EXPRESS RAIL OVERVIEW 1. GO REGIONAL EXPRESS RAIL OVERVIEW Over the next ten years Metrolinx will be implementing Regional Express Rail (GO RER) service across the GO rail network, a part of the Government of Ontario’s Moving Ontario Forward plan, announced on April 17, 2015. Through GO RER, the core segments of the GO network will be upgraded to feature: • Frequent, all-day service • Faster trip times • Electric trains New rail service will be provided throughout the weekday, evenings, and weekends, leading to substantial increases in ridership in the off-peak periods, and augmenting already significant ridership in the peak periods. This would be a 140% forecast increase in overall ridership over the next fifteen years. In order to speed travel, investments will be made in track speed improvements, electric trains and equipment, grade separations, and other improvements. The tracks, corridors, and trains themselves will be used more intensively and GO RER will improve the time it takes for commuters to complete their journeys in a host of ways. In addition to reductions in journey times achieved by cutting wait times and increasing travel speeds through electrification, GO RER will increase transit system capacity. Investing in capital improvements to existing GO rail corridors would mean that additional service and capacity could be provided cost effectively in a built-up urban environment while generating important economic, social and environmental benefits. With the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) region poised to grow to 9 million people by 2031, GO RER is a means to meet the region’s transit needs.
    [Show full text]
  • GO Expansion Full Business Case    November 2018 
    GO Expansion Full Business Case November 2018 GO EXPANSION FULL BUSINESS CASE GO EXPANSION FULL BUSINESS CASE GO Expansion Full Business Case November 2018 GO EXPANSION FULL BUSINESS CASE Contents Executive Summary 2. Context 3. GO Expansion Program Problem and Opportunity ii 2.1 The Need for Regional Transportation 3.2 Reference Concept Design Process Investment: Managing Growth and Assumptions 61 The Benefit iii Congestion 12 3.3 Program Interdependencies and Preface & Background iv 2.2 Problem Statement 13 Parallel Projects 69 The Case for Change vi Problem Deep Dive — Proposed Investment ix Understanding the Need for Investment 15 Strategic Case xiv Planned Transportation Investments 21 4. Strategic Case Economic Case xviii 2.3 The Opportunity: Strategic Case Summary 74 Invest in Rail to Accommodate Growth 24 Financial Case xx 4.1 Transportation Benefits 75 2.4 The Solution: Transform GO Rail Deliverability and Operations Case xxii into a Rapid Rail System 28 4.2 Quality of Life Benefits 84 Conclusion xxiii Experience from other City-Regions 30 4.3 Economic Prosperity and Development Benefits 88 GO Expansion – Regional Benefits and Evaluation Framework 32 4.4 Protected Environment Benefits 97 1. Introduction 4.5 Strategic Case Conclusions 100 Background 3 Summary 100 What is GO Expansion? 3 3. GO Expansion Program Key Considerations for Future Program Planning 102 What is a Full Business Case? 6 3.1 Program Definition 41 Full Business Case Structure 6 Program Overview 41 Reference Concept Design Summary 41 5. Economic Case GO Rail Line Improvements 49 Economic Case Summary 106 Lakeshore West 50 5.1 Economic Case Analysis 107 Kitchener 52 Understanding Benefit CostAnalysis 107 Barrie 54 5.2 Economic Narrative 109 Stouffville 56 5.3 Economic Costs 110 Lakeshore East 58 5.4 User Impacts 111 Milton and Richmond Hill 60 5.5 External Impacts 113 5.6 Wider Impacts 115 GO EXPANSION FULL BUSINESS CASE 5.
    [Show full text]
  • GO Transit Service Expansion Update
    GO Transit Service Expansion Update Metrolinx Board of Directors Meeting Leslie Woo, Chief Planning Officer Meeting Date: June 28, 2017 BACKGROUND • GO Regional Express Rail (RER) will result in enhanced peak services and faster more frequent two-way all-day rail service within the most heavily travelled sections of the GO network by 2025 • In the next 3 to 5 years, GO RER rail early service expansions will add significantly more off-peak trips on most Metrolinx-owned corridors through hourly two-way service • These services build on 30 minute Lakeshore service that has helped grow Lakeshore line ridership 12% over the past 5 years • The addition of rail service follows a rigorous process of analysis and approvals taking into account customer demands, operational needs and historical infrastructure constraints, particularly at Union 2 GO RER: 15 MINUTE SERVICE, BOTH WAYS 3 SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS SINCE 2015 Since 2015, GO rail and bus expansions have enhanced service across the network and made significant progress toward RER: • Over 240 new trips have been added each week, an increase of 18% (from about 1,340 trips to over 1,580 trips) • Hourly midday weekday service was added to the Kitchener line • Two-way all-day weekend service was added to the Barrie line • Hourly midday and evening weekday service was added to the Stouffville line • Service on the Lakeshore West and Richmond Hill lines was extended to two newly completed GO stations • New and additional bus services have been introduced connecting Brantford, Cambridge and Kitchener
    [Show full text]