NANCY GOLDRING 463 West St. Apt. A1112 NY NY 10014
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70 -
UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Saving Carnegie Hall: A Case Study of Historic Preservation in Postwar New York City Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3x19f20h Author Schmitz, Sandra Elizabeth Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Saving Carnegie Hall: A Case Study of Historic Preservation in Postwar New York A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History by Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz June 2015 Thesis Committee: Dr. Patricia Morton, Chairperson Dr. Jason Weems Dr. Catherine Gudis Copyright by Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz 2015 The Thesis of Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Patricia Morton, for helping me to arrive at this topic and for providing encouragement and support along the way. I’m incredibly grateful for the time she took to share her knowledgeable insight and provide thorough feedback. Committee members Dr. Jason Weems and Dr. Catherine Gudis also brought valuable depth to my project through their knowledge of American architecture, urbanism, and preservation. The department of Art History at the University of California, Riverside (UCR) made this project possible by providing me with a travel grant to conduct research in New York City. Carnegie Hall’s archivists graciously guided my research at the beginning of this project and provided more information than I could fit in this thesis. I could not have accomplished this project without the support of Stacie, Hannah, Leah, and all the friends who helped me stay grounded through the last two years of writing, editing, and talking about architecture. -
Section Date Title Box Folder Notes Daily 1962 February 19
Ada Louise Huxtable New York Times bibliography Ada Louise Huxtable papers, 1859-2013, bulk 1954-2012 The Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles, accession no. 2013.M.9 For more information about the Ada Louise Huxtable papers, see the collection finding aid To access physical materials on site, go to the library catalog record for this collection and click "Request." Click here for the access policy. Section Date Title Box Folder Notes Daily 1962 February 19 Art: Wright Mythology 16 4 Daily 1962 April 29 Controversy Widens on Design of Development in Washington 16 4 Daily 1962 June 1 Kennedy Adopts Architects' Plan to Give Capital a Modern Look 16 4 Daily 1962 November 11 Federal Pavilion for New York World's Fair Is Nearing a Decision 16 4 Daily 1963 January 26 A Fair U.S. Pavilion 16 4 Daily 1963 May 28 Bold Harvard Structure 16 4 Daily 1963 June 21 Litho City: Hit or Flop? 16 4 Daily 1963 August 14 Chicago Saves Its Past 16 4 Daily 1963 August 20 Plan for Rebuilding Pennsylvania Ave. Is Near Completion 16 4 Daily 1963 October 5 Architecture: Designs for American Synagogues 16 4 Daily 1963 October 10 Upheaval at Battery 16 4 Daily 1963 October 16 Planner Defends Cars in Midtown 16 4 Daily 1963 October 24 Architecture: Virtues of Planned City 16 4 Daily 1963 November 7 Complex in Boston Is Radically Designed 16 4 Daily 1963 November 9 Yale to Dedicate 3D New Building 16 4 Daily 1963 November 24 Renewal Project Splits Cleveland 16 4 Review of Great American Mansions Daily 1963 November 26 End Papers 16 4 by Merrill Folsom. -
The New York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation, 19 J
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brooklyn Law School: BrooklynWorks Journal of Law and Policy Volume 19 | Issue 1 Article 11 2010 Smash or Save: The ewN York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation Rebecca Birmingham Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp Recommended Citation Rebecca Birmingham, Smash or Save: The New York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation, 19 J. L. & Pol'y (2010). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol19/iss1/11 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Policy by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. SMASH OR SAVE: THE NEW YORK CITY LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ACT AND NEW CHALLENGES TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION Rebecca Birmingham* “[W]e will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed. Ada Louise Huxtable, Farewell to Penn Station”1 INTRODUCTION A demolition crew lops a meticulously maintained cornice off an architecturally unique building.2 A church begs for permission to erect a soaring office tower next to a turn-of-the-century chapel.3 A pop star wields her considerable clout to finagle a dispensation to install historically inappropriate windows in her Brooklyn brownstone.4 These are just a few examples of the most recent challenges * J.D. Candidate, Brooklyn Law School, 2011; B.A., Individualized Study, New York University, 2008. Many thanks to the editorial staff at the Journal of Law and Policy for their input and suggestions. -
Fall BOOKS 2011
CHICAGO F ChiCago FA l l BOOKS 2011 A ll 2011 INTERNATIONA l EDITION IntErnatIonaL EdItIon University of Chicago Press Chicago of University Street 60th East 1427 60637 IL Chicago, Fall 2011 Guide to Subjects Contents African American Studies 24 Jewish Studies 104 African Studies 72 Law 33, 91, 101 General Interest 1 Special Interest 31 American History 7, 22, 25, 40–43, Linguistics 131–133 45, 64, 81–82, 88, 93, 98–99, 136 Paperbacks 77 Literary Criticism 16, 51–55, 57, 79, Distributed Books 105 Anthropology 37, 66, 72–73, 127, 130, 103–104, 137, 142 137, 142 Ordering Information 143 Literature 2, 14, 23, 99, 108–109, 126 Author Index 144 Archaeology 97 Mathematics 75 Title Index 145 Architecture 50, 80, 89, 120, 142 Media 56 Art 1, 15–16, 38, 51–52, 68, 74, 110, 115–116, 122–126, 139–140, 142 Media Studies 142 Asian Studies 60, 65–66, 89, 116 Medicine 41 Biography 1, 39 Memoir 106 Business 17 Music 3, 60, 82 Children’s 130 Mystery 87 Classics 14, 44, 49, 57 Nature 4–5, 8–9, 13, 88, 93, 118, 141 Criminology 75–76 Philosophy 18, 46–48, 51, 57, 71, 74, 92, 95, 98, 100, 113, 115, 123, 132–133, Current Events 56, 60, 91, 95 142 Drama 117, 142 Photography 4, 5, 8, 9, 56, 111, 118, 119, 121, 128, 142 Economics 20, 36, 66, 75–76, 86, 95, 101–102, 113, 138 Poetry 29, 30, 96, 110, 128, 141 Education 58, 59, 91, 131, 142 Political Science 21, 24, 28, 32, 34–36, 46, 71, 73, 137–138 European History 20, 44, 73–74, 78, 106–107 Psychology 36, 47, 58, 125 Fiction 90, 112, 114–115, 117, 124 Reference 19, 21, 94, 97, 129, 134–135 Film Studies 60, 83, -
National Geographic Society Headquarters
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name National Geographic Society Headquarters other names/site number 2. Location street & number 1145 17th Street NW not for publication city or town Washington vicinity state District of Columbia code DC county code zip code 20036 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. -
Artist Information Binder
50th Reunion Art Exhibition years—the distance between Gothic and Renaissance art; between Mannerism and Baroque; and between Impressionism and Surrealism. Has 50 that much time passed since we left Smith? The variety of styles and ways of working represented in this exhibition is vast. The predominance of media, whose new digital processes would have been unfathomable, urges us to examine our situation as Smith art students from 1963 to 1967? What did we learn? What have we lived through? How different are we now from who we were? Who are we—as artists—now? We were taught by male artists who were trained as Social Realists. Some were painterly abstractionists, some were figurative. All of them had to contend with the war’s aftermath. Most had a profound sense of social justice and they passed that sense of purpose on to us. Female role models were not present within the studio faculty. The Smith College Museum of Art’s collection included few works by women artists. We could study painting, drawing, design, sculpture, printmaking (relief, intaglio, and lithography – black-and-white only), typography and book design, and even architecture. We could take Smith’s magnificent classes in art history – a history that omitted women. During our time at Smith, the inventor of polymer acrylic paint visited to promote and extoll this revolutionary medium. It was a cutting-edge experience. However, the College did not offer ceramics, photography, or film making. If you studied those media elsewhere, you were unable to earn academic credit. Video and computer graphics did not exist except in the minds of the most visionary, experimental artists. -
Landmarks Preservation Commission October 30, 2007, Designation List No
Landmarks Preservation Commission October 30, 2007, Designation List No. 397 LP-2246 MANHATTAN HOUSE, 200 East 66th Street, Manhattan (aka 200-260 East 66th Street, 201-257 East 65th Street, 1241-1259 Second Avenue, 1111-1129 Third Avenue), Manhattan. Built 1947-51, Mayer & Whittlesey and Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, associated architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan, Tax Map Block 1420, Lot 1. On April 10, 2007, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of 200 East 66th Street and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 12). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with provisions of law. Thirteen people spoke in favor of designation, including City Council member Daniel Garodnick, State Senator Liz Krueger, and representatives of State Assembly member Jonathan L. Bing, Docomomo US / New York Tri-State, the Historic Districts Council, Friends of the Upper East Side, Landmarks Conservancy, Modern Architecture Working Group, Municipal Art Society, as well as tenants in the building. The Commission has also received numerous letters in support of designation. Summary Manhattan House, an Upper East Side apartment and retail complex, was constructed between 1947 and 1951. Commissioned by the New York Life Insurance Company, it occupies an entire block, bounded by East 65th Street and East 66th Street, Second Avenue and Third Avenue. Designed by Mayer & Whittlesey and Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, associated architects, this modern-style apartment house has as many as 21 floors and is notable for its impressive size, plan, massing and color. Considered by many writers to be the first white brick apartment building, it was also notable for being one of the first multiple dwellings in New York City to attempt “an indoor-outdoor synthesis” through the integration of large windows and deep projecting balconies, as well as landscaped driveways and a block-long rear garden enclosed by a low granite wall. -
Pulitzer Prize Winners and Finalists
WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70 -
GSA) Determination of Eligibility Study for the J
Description of document: General Services Administration (GSA) Determination of Eligibility Study for the J. Edgar Hoover Building, 2014 Requested date: 24-October-2020 Release date: 07-December-2020 Posted date: 25-January-2021 Source of document: U.S. General Services Administration FOIA Requester Service Center (H3A) 1800 F Street, NW, 7308 Washington, DC 20405-0001 Fax: 202-501-2727 FOIAonline The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Office of General Counsel FOIA Requester Service Center December 7, 2020 This letter is in response to your U.S. -
Jean-Noel Archive.Qxp.Qxp
THE JEAN-NOËL HERLIN ARCHIVE PROJECT Jean-Noël Herlin New York City 2005 Table of Contents Introduction i Individual artists and performers, collaborators, and groups 1 Individual artists and performers, collaborators, and groups. Selections A-D 77 Group events and clippings by title 109 Group events without title / Organizations 129 Periodicals 149 Introduction In the context of my activity as an antiquarian bookseller I began in 1973 to acquire exhibition invitations/announcements and poster/mailers on painting, sculpture, drawing and prints, performance, and video. I was motivated by the quasi-neglect in which these ephemeral primary sources in art history were held by American commercial channels, and the project to create a database towards the bibliographic recording of largely ignored material. Documentary value and thinness were my only criteria of inclusion. Sources of material were random. Material was acquired as funds could be diverted from my bookshop. With the rapid increase in number and diversity of sources, my initial concept evolved from a documentary to a study archive project on international visual and performing arts, reflecting the appearance of new media and art making/producing practices, globalization, the blurring of lines between high and low, and the challenges to originality and quality as authoritative criteria of classification and appreciation. In addition to painting, sculpture, drawing and prints, performance and video, the Jean-Noël Herlin Archive Project includes material on architecture, design, caricature, comics, animation, mail art, music, dance, theater, photography, film, textiles and the arts of fire. It also contains material on galleries, collectors, museums, foundations, alternative spaces, and clubs. -
140 BROADWAY, Originally the Marine Midland Bank Building (Aka 71-89 Cedar Street, 54- 74 Liberty Street, 27-39 Nassau Street), Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission June 25, 2013, Designation List 465 LP-2530 140 BROADWAY, originally the Marine Midland Bank Building (aka 71-89 Cedar Street, 54- 74 Liberty Street, 27-39 Nassau Street), Manhattan. Built 1964-68; Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, architect; Gordon Bunshaft, partner in charge of design; Roger N. Radford, lead designer Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 48, Lot 1 On April 2, 2013, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of 140 Broadway and the proposed designation of the Landmark site (Item No. 1). The hearing was duly advertised according to law. Four people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of Docomomo US/New York Tri-State, the Historic Districts Council, and the New York Landmarks Conservancy. A second hearing was held on May 13, 2013 (Item No. 1) in which three representatives of the owner spoke in support of designation. Summary A critically-acclaimed example of mid- 20thcentury modernism, the former Marine Midland Bank Building at 140 Broadway was completed in early 1968. Architect Gordon Bunshaft, of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, was the partner in charge of the minimalist design – a matte black aluminum and bronze-tinted glass skyscraper that The New York Times architecture critic Ada Louise Huxtable later described as “not only one of [the] buildings I admire most in New York, but that I admire most anywhere.” Erwin S. Wolfson assembled the trapezoidal site by 1961, covering an entire block between Nassau Street and Broadway, and following his death, a revised 51-story scheme was commissioned by developers Harry Helmsley and Lawrence A.