Section Date Title Box Folder Notes Daily 1962 February 19
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Historic Preservation Law: the Metes & Bounds of a New Field
Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Faculty Publications School of Law 1-1-1981 Historic Preservation Law: The Metes & Bounds of a New Field Nicholas A. Robinson Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Nicholas A. Robinson, Historic Preservation Law: The Metes & Bounds of a New Field, 1 Pace L. Rev. 511 (1981), http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/387/. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Historic Preservation Law: The Metes & Bounds of a New Field NICHOLAS A. ROBINSON* Historic Preservation Law has come to mean that combina- tion of regulations, common-law property principles, tax incen- tives, and adjective law in administrative proceedings, governing historic sites and property within the United States. Although Congress first recognized a need to conserve the nation's wealth of historic amenities in 1906 when it adopted The Antiquities Act,' it was only with the nation's bicentennial that the volume and diversity of laws designed to maintain, protect and preserve historic America grew to the point where it could be said that a new field of law had emerged. The symposium which follows this essay represents the first attempt to comprehensively delineate the elements of this new field.8 The conference entitled "Historic Preservation and the * J.D., 1970, Columbia University; A.B., 1967, Brown University; Associate Profes- sor of Law, Pace University School of Law. -
Landmarks Preservation Commission November 22, 2016, Designation List 490 LP-2579
Landmarks Preservation Commission November 22, 2016, Designation List 490 LP-2579 YALE CLUB OF NEW YORK CITY 50 Vanderbilt Avenue (aka 49-55 East 44th Street), Manhattan Built 1913-15; architect, James Gamble Rogers Landmark site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1279, Lot 28 On September 13, 2016, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of the Yale Club of New York City and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site. The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with provisions of law. Six people spoke in support of designation, including representatives of the Yale Club of New York City, Manhattan Borough President Gale A. Brewer, Historic Districts Council, New York Landmarks Conservancy, and the Municipal Art Society of New York. The Real Estate Board of New York submitted written testimony in opposition to designation. State Senator Brad Hoylman submitted written testimony in support of designation. Summary The Yale Club of New York City is a Renaissance Revival-style skyscraper at the northwest corner of Vanderbilt Avenue and East 44th Street. For more than a century it has played an important role in East Midtown, serving the Yale community and providing a handsome and complementary backdrop to Grand Central Terminal. Constructed on property that was once owned by the New York Central Railroad, it stands directly above two levels of train tracks and platforms. This was the ideal location to build the Yale Club, opposite the new terminal, which serves New Haven, where Yale University is located, and at the east end of “clubhouse row.” The architect was James Gamble Rogers, who graduated from Yale College in 1889 and attended the Ecole des Beaux Arts in Paris during the 1890s. -
The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70 -
Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision for the East Side Access Project
Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision For the East Side Access Project September 2012 SUMMARY OF DECISION This is a Record of Decision (ROD) of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), an operating administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, regarding the East Side Access (ESA) Project. FRA has prepared this ROD in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA, and FRA’s Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) filed an application with the FRA for a loan to finance eligible elements of the ESA Project through the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program. The ESA Project is the MTA’s largest system expansion in over 100 years. The ESA Project will expand the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) services by connecting Queens and Long Island with East Midtown Manhattan. With direct LIRR service to Midtown East, the LIRR will further increase its market share of commuters by saving up to 40 minutes per day in subway/bus/sidewalk travel time for commuters who work on Manhattan’s East Side. The ESA Project was previously considered in an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in May 2001 and subsequent FTA reevaluations and an environmental assessment of changes in the ESA Project. Construction of the ESA Project has been ongoing since 2001. FRA has reviewed the environmental impacts for the ESA Project identified in the FTA March 2001 Final EIS, subsequent FTA Reevaluations, and the 2006 Supplemental EA/FONSI (collectively, the “2001 EIS”) for the ESA Project and adopted it pursuant to CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1506.3). -
UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Saving Carnegie Hall: A Case Study of Historic Preservation in Postwar New York City Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3x19f20h Author Schmitz, Sandra Elizabeth Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Saving Carnegie Hall: A Case Study of Historic Preservation in Postwar New York A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History by Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz June 2015 Thesis Committee: Dr. Patricia Morton, Chairperson Dr. Jason Weems Dr. Catherine Gudis Copyright by Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz 2015 The Thesis of Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Patricia Morton, for helping me to arrive at this topic and for providing encouragement and support along the way. I’m incredibly grateful for the time she took to share her knowledgeable insight and provide thorough feedback. Committee members Dr. Jason Weems and Dr. Catherine Gudis also brought valuable depth to my project through their knowledge of American architecture, urbanism, and preservation. The department of Art History at the University of California, Riverside (UCR) made this project possible by providing me with a travel grant to conduct research in New York City. Carnegie Hall’s archivists graciously guided my research at the beginning of this project and provided more information than I could fit in this thesis. I could not have accomplished this project without the support of Stacie, Hannah, Leah, and all the friends who helped me stay grounded through the last two years of writing, editing, and talking about architecture. -
The New York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation, 19 J
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brooklyn Law School: BrooklynWorks Journal of Law and Policy Volume 19 | Issue 1 Article 11 2010 Smash or Save: The ewN York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation Rebecca Birmingham Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp Recommended Citation Rebecca Birmingham, Smash or Save: The New York City Landmarks Preservation Act and New Challenges to Historic Preservation, 19 J. L. & Pol'y (2010). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol19/iss1/11 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Policy by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. SMASH OR SAVE: THE NEW YORK CITY LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ACT AND NEW CHALLENGES TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION Rebecca Birmingham* “[W]e will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed. Ada Louise Huxtable, Farewell to Penn Station”1 INTRODUCTION A demolition crew lops a meticulously maintained cornice off an architecturally unique building.2 A church begs for permission to erect a soaring office tower next to a turn-of-the-century chapel.3 A pop star wields her considerable clout to finagle a dispensation to install historically inappropriate windows in her Brooklyn brownstone.4 These are just a few examples of the most recent challenges * J.D. Candidate, Brooklyn Law School, 2011; B.A., Individualized Study, New York University, 2008. Many thanks to the editorial staff at the Journal of Law and Policy for their input and suggestions. -
Download Report
NEW YORK PROFITING THROUGH PRESERVATION PRESERVATION LEAGUE OF NEW YORK STATE MISSION STATEMENT By leading a statewide preservation movement, sharing information and expertise, and raising a unified voice, the Preservation League of New York State promotes historic preservation as a tool to revitalize our neighborhoods and communities, honor our heritage, and enrich our lives. Funding for this project was generously provided by The Chase Manhattan Bank. Printing was made possible with public funds from the New York State Council on the Arts. This report was prepared by Donovan D. Rypkema, Principal, Real Estate Services Group, Inc., Washington, DC, with assistance from the Preservation League of New York State. VISION OF NEW YORK STATE The Preservation League of New York State is committed to a New York where all citizens recognize the intrinsic value of historic sites and cherish them as a vital part of everyday life. We envision New Yorkers who promote careful use of our diverse historic resources and understand the economic and social benefits of historic preservation. The League aspires to create a universal preservation ethic that prevents losing our past through neglect, ignorance, or momentary expediency. We will strive to remind New Yorkers in every city, hamlet, and neighborhood of the value of the past, the ways in which it enriches our lives, and the irreplaceable legacy it provides our children. Historic preservation is a daily part of life for Historic preservation is attending a City nearly every New York citizen. For some, it means Council meeting in Buffalo’s Art Deco style City a visit to one of the hundreds of museums or Hall, or serving on jury duty in the landmark historic sites throughout the state. -
Fall BOOKS 2011
CHICAGO F ChiCago FA l l BOOKS 2011 A ll 2011 INTERNATIONA l EDITION IntErnatIonaL EdItIon University of Chicago Press Chicago of University Street 60th East 1427 60637 IL Chicago, Fall 2011 Guide to Subjects Contents African American Studies 24 Jewish Studies 104 African Studies 72 Law 33, 91, 101 General Interest 1 Special Interest 31 American History 7, 22, 25, 40–43, Linguistics 131–133 45, 64, 81–82, 88, 93, 98–99, 136 Paperbacks 77 Literary Criticism 16, 51–55, 57, 79, Distributed Books 105 Anthropology 37, 66, 72–73, 127, 130, 103–104, 137, 142 137, 142 Ordering Information 143 Literature 2, 14, 23, 99, 108–109, 126 Author Index 144 Archaeology 97 Mathematics 75 Title Index 145 Architecture 50, 80, 89, 120, 142 Media 56 Art 1, 15–16, 38, 51–52, 68, 74, 110, 115–116, 122–126, 139–140, 142 Media Studies 142 Asian Studies 60, 65–66, 89, 116 Medicine 41 Biography 1, 39 Memoir 106 Business 17 Music 3, 60, 82 Children’s 130 Mystery 87 Classics 14, 44, 49, 57 Nature 4–5, 8–9, 13, 88, 93, 118, 141 Criminology 75–76 Philosophy 18, 46–48, 51, 57, 71, 74, 92, 95, 98, 100, 113, 115, 123, 132–133, Current Events 56, 60, 91, 95 142 Drama 117, 142 Photography 4, 5, 8, 9, 56, 111, 118, 119, 121, 128, 142 Economics 20, 36, 66, 75–76, 86, 95, 101–102, 113, 138 Poetry 29, 30, 96, 110, 128, 141 Education 58, 59, 91, 131, 142 Political Science 21, 24, 28, 32, 34–36, 46, 71, 73, 137–138 European History 20, 44, 73–74, 78, 106–107 Psychology 36, 47, 58, 125 Fiction 90, 112, 114–115, 117, 124 Reference 19, 21, 94, 97, 129, 134–135 Film Studies 60, 83, -
The Radio Urbanism of Robert C. Weinberg, 1966–71 by Christopher Neville for the New York Preservation Archive Project
“Building and Rebuilding New York:” The Radio Urbanism of Robert C. Weinberg, 1966–71 by Christopher Neville for the New York Preservation Archive Project “...This is Robert C. Weinberg, critic-at-large in architecture and planning for WNYC.” Introduction: Robert Weinberg, Department of Parks (under Robert Moses), New York City, and WNYC and at the Department of City Planning. Robert C. Weinberg was an architect and urban planner active in New York from the He taught courses in planning and related early 1930s until his death in 1974. Over four fields at New York University, the Pratt Insti- decades of vigorous engagement with preser- tute, the New School for Social Research, and vation and planning issues, he was both an ac- Yale, and published roughly 150 articles and tive participant in or astute observer of almost reviews. He was also the co-editor, with every major development in New York urban- Henry Fagin, of the important 1958 report, ism. Between 1966 and 1971, near the end of Planning and Community Appearance, jointly his career, he served as radio station WNYC’s sponsored by the New York chapters of the “critic-at-large in architecture and planning,” American Institute of Architects and the and his broadcasts are a window onto his re- American Institute of Planners. markable career and the transformations he But over his long career, Weinberg devoted witnessed in the city he loved. Weinberg’s the bulk of his considerable energies to a long personal history in the trenches and be- broad range of public-spirited efforts covering hind the scenes gave him unique perspective almost every aspect of urban development and on these changes—an insider’s overview, with city life, including historic preservation, zon- a veteran’s hindsight. -
Book Review Miracle on Fourth Street: Saving an Old Merchant’S House by Lisa Ackerman, Secretary, New York Preservation Archive Project
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Anthony C. Wood, Chair Elizabeth R. Jeffe, Vice-Chair Bradley J. Vogel, Vice-Chair Stephen Facey, Treasurer Lisa Ackerman, Secretary Daniel J. Allen Michele H. Bogart Susan De Vries Kent Diebolt Amy Freitag Shirley Ferguson Jenks Richard J. Moylan Otis Pratt Pearsall Gina Pollara John T. Reddick Anthony W. Robins NEWSLETTER FALL 2016 Welcome to the 25th edition of the newsletter of the New York Preservation Archive Project. The mission of the New York Preservation Archive Project is to protect and raise awareness of the narratives of historic preservation in New York. Through public programs, outreach, celebration, and the creation of public access to information, the Archive Project hopes to bring these stories to light. From left to right: Denise Brown-Puryear, Yvonne Taylor, and Mandingo Tshaka, interviewees in the first phase of Saving Preservation Stories, Courtesy of Liz Strong and Leyla Vural Diversity Project Expanding! Oral History Project Focused on Diverse Preservation Stories Receives Additional Funding The New York Preservation Archive Project Archive Project’s oral history collection so is pleased to announce the expansion of that it reflects a more complete and diverse 2016 Bard Birthday the oral history project Saving Preservation narrative of preservation in New York City. Breakfast Benefit Stories: Diversity & the Outer Boroughs. Over the past year interviewers visited every Honoring Robert A.M. Stern Made possible through a grant from the borough in the City to interview community with our Preservation Award LuEsther T. Mertz Fund of the New York members who have worked tirelessly to and featuring a Community Trust, this expansion will allow preserve the history and architecture of Conversation on Preservation with the Archive Project to record additional sites and neighborhoods important to them Robert A.M. -
West End-Collegiate Historic District Extension Designation Report
Addendum to the West End-Collegiate Historic District Extension Designation Report On October 30, 2013, the City Council of the City of New York modified the designation of the West End-Collegiate Historic District Extension, Designation List No. 465, LP-2462 (L.U. No. 918), City Council Resolution No. 1998, by deleting the following properties: 214 West 72nd Street Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1163, Lot 42 232 West 73rd Street [Display Address: 236 West 73rd Street] Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1164, Lot 42 In addition, the areas of the street beds of West 72nd Street and West 73rd Street that are directly in front of these buildings are also deleted from the district. West End-Collegiate Historic District Extension Landmarks Preservation Commission W 79 St 6 West End-Collegiate 320 3 7 250 9 3 9 0 9 1 3 2 Historic District Extension 2 1 9 3 Borough of Manhattan, NY [LP-2462] Calendared: November 16, 2010 339 317 257 251 340 324 262 W 78 St 250 Public Hearing: June 28, 2011 Designated: June 25, 2013 Boundary of District Extension 2 1 3 5 6 8 0 Tax Map Lots, District Extension 1 0 343 323 233 273 W 77 St Boundaries of Existing Districts Tax Map Lots, Existing Districts West End-Collegiate 2 1 6 Deleted by City Council Historic District 9 October 30, 2013 241 235 3 260 W 76 St 230 3 Existing Historic Districts 6 Historic District Extension Bronx 2 1 3 9 259 235 H W 75 St e 304 228 A 5 W n 1 R m 3 r e y i B s v s r t H e e t o est Side/ r Upper W r E u a s d d d i n d a w s d Central Park West e m o a A n D y Manhattan A ric District v Histo r P v y 301 W 74 St 231 Queens 1 320 232 5 Brooklyn 319 251 234 232 (Display 320 W 73 St Address 236) 1 311 233 W 72 St 216 214 344 West 71st Street Historic District 357 353 303 213 352 342 308 W 71 St 212 2 1 2 2 250 0 2 Feet 303 211 ¯ W 70 St Graphic Source: MapPLUTO, Edition 09v1, 2009. -
National Geographic Society Headquarters
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name National Geographic Society Headquarters other names/site number 2. Location street & number 1145 17th Street NW not for publication city or town Washington vicinity state District of Columbia code DC county code zip code 20036 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.