24. STREPTOPUS Michaux, Fl. Bor.-Amer. 1: 200. 1803. 扭柄花属 Niu Bing Hua Shu Chen Xinqi (陈心启 Chen Sing-Chi); Minoru N

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

24. STREPTOPUS Michaux, Fl. Bor.-Amer. 1: 200. 1803. 扭柄花属 Niu Bing Hua Shu Chen Xinqi (陈心启 Chen Sing-Chi); Minoru N Flora of China 24: 153–154. 2000. 24. STREPTOPUS Michaux, Fl. Bor.-Amer. 1: 200. 1803. 扭柄花属 niu bing hua shu Chen Xinqi (陈心启 Chen Sing-chi); Minoru N. Tamura Herbs perennial, with a creeping rhizome. Stem erect, simple or distally branched. Leaves alternate, sessile, ovate to lanceolate, thin, many veined, base sometimes amplexicaul. Flowers usually 1 or 2 on an axillary, slender peduncle partly adnate to stem, rarely 2–4 flowers in a terminal inflorescence. Flowers campanulate or subrotate. Tepals 6, free, outer ones usually slightly wider than inner. Stamens 6, inserted at or near base of tepals; filaments usually flat at base; anthers basifixed. Ovary 3-loculed; ovules (2 or 3 or)6–8 per locule. Style columnar or very short. Fruit a berry, globose, several to many seeded. About ten species: temperate regions of the N hemisphere; five species (two endemic) in China. 1a. Flowers (2 or)3 or 4 in a terminal inflorescence; tepals cuspidate-caudate at apex ........................................................... 1. S. ovalis 1b. Flowers 1 or 2, on an axillary, slender peduncle partly adnate to stem; tepals acuminate at apex. 2a. Leaves ciliate-denticulate at margin. 3a. Style very short or indistinct; stigma subentire; peduncle curved but not geniculate ...................................... 2. S. koreanus 3b. Style distinct, columnar, 3–4 mm; stigma deeply 3-lobed; peduncle geniculate near middle ........................ 3. S. obtusatus 2b. Leaves entire at margin. 4a. Tepals 8–10 × 3–4 mm; anthers longer than filaments ...................................................................................... 4. S. simplex 4b. Tepals 6.5–8 × 1–2 mm; anthers shorter than filaments ............................................................................... 5. S. parviflorus 1. Streptopus ovalis (Ohwi) F. T. Wang & Y. C. Tang in F. T. smooth. Style indistinct; stigma subentire. Berry 6–9 mm in Wang & Tang, Fl. Reipubl. Popularis Sin. 15: 49. 1978. diam. Seeds many, oblong, slightly curved. Fl. May, fr. Jul–Aug. 卵叶扭柄花 luan ye niu bing hua Forests; 800–2000 m. Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning [Korea]. 3. Streptopus obtusatus Fassett, Rhodora 37: 102. 1935. Disporum ovale Ohwi, Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 45: 385. 1931; Prosartes ovalis (Ohwi) M. N. Tamura. 扭柄花 niu bing hua Rhizome elongate, slender, ca. 2 mm thick. Stem some- Streptopus geniculatus F. T. Wang & Tang. times branched distally, ± flexuous, 20–45 cm, pubescent. Rhizome elongate, slender, 1–2 mm thick, with numerous Leaves oblong, ovate-lanceolate, or ovate-elliptic, 4–11 × 2–4 hairy roots. Stem simple or branched distally, 15–35 cm, gla- cm, thinly papery, base cordate, margin ciliate-denticulate, apex brous. Leaves ovate-lanceolate or oblong-lanceolate, 5–8 × 2.5– long acuminate. Flowers (2 or)3 or 4 in a terminal, umbel-like 4 cm, base cordate, margin ciliate-denticulate, apex mucronate. inflorescence, suberect; pedicel 1.5–3 cm, pubescent. Tepals Peduncle axillary, 2–2.5 cm, jointed and geniculate near middle, white, spotted with purple, ovate-lanceolate, 8–9 × 2–3 mm, with a swollen gland at joint, 1-flowered. Flowers nodding. apex cuspidate-caudate. Filaments ca. 3 mm; anthers elliptic. Tepals yellowish, sometimes spotted with purple adaxially, ob- Ovary globose, winged along angles. Style 3.5–4 mm, much long-lanceolate to lanceolate, 8–9 × 1–2 mm. Stamens 3.5–4.5 longer than ovary; stigma distinctly 3-lobed. Berry 2- or 3- mm; filaments short, broad; anthers 3–4 mm. Ovary smooth. seeded. Seeds suborbicular, furrowed. Fl. May, fr. Aug. Style 3–4 mm; stigma deeply 3-lobed. Berry 6–8 mm in diam. Forests. SW Liaoning [Korea]. Seeds elliptic. Fl. Jul, fr. Aug–Sep. Tamura (in Kubitzki, Fam. Gen. Vasc. Pl. 3: 171. 1998) included • Coniferous forests; 2000–3600 m. Gansu, W Hubei, Shaanxi, this species in the American genus Prosartes D. Don. Further studies Sichuan, Yunnan. are needed in order to ascertain whether this species should be included 4. Streptopus simplex D. Don, Prodr. Fl. Nepal. 48. 1825. in Prosartes or Streptopus. 腋花扭柄花 2. Streptopus koreanus (Komarov) Ohwi, Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) ye hua niu bing hua 45: 189. 1931. Rhizome 1.5–2 mm thick. Stem simple or branched dis- 丝梗扭柄花 si geng niu bing hua tally, 20–50 cm, glabrous. Leaves grayish glaucous abaxially, lanceolate to ovate-lanceolate, 2.5–8 × 1.5–3 cm, base rounded Streptopus ajanensis Tiling var. koreanus Komarov, Trudy or cordate, margin entire, apex acuminate. Peduncle axillary, Imp. S.-Peterburgsk. Bot. Sada 20: 476. 1901. 2.5–4.5 cm, neither jointed nor geniculate, glabrous, 1-flowered. Rhizome elongate, slender, ca. 1 mm thick. Stem simple or Flowers nodding. Tepals pink or white, spotted with purple, ovate-oblong, 8–10 × 3–4 mm. Stamens 3–3.5 mm; filaments branched distally, 15–40 cm, sparsely hispidulous. Leaves ovate- lanceolate to ovate-elliptic, 3–10 × 1–3 cm, thinly papery, base flat, basally widened, 1–1.5 mm; anthers ca. 2 mm. Style rounded, margin ciliate-denticulate, apex mucronate. Flowers slender, 5–6 mm; stigma 3-lobed, lobes revolute, ca. 1 mm. 1 or 2 on an axillary peduncle; peduncle wirelike, ca. 1.5 cm, Berry 5–6 mm in diam. Fl. Jun, fr. Aug–Sep. 2n = 16, 32*. not geniculate, elongate in fruit. Tepals yellowish green, nar- Forests, bamboo thickets, hillsides along streams, alpine grass- rowly ovate, 2–3 × ca. 1 mm, minutely tuberculate adaxially, lands; 1700–4000 m. S Xizang, Yunnan [Bhutan, Myanmar, Nepal, base connate, apex acuminate. Filaments very short, flat; an- Sikkim]. thers obcordate, minutely tuberculate basally. Ovary globose, Flora of China 24: 153–154. 2000. 5. Streptopus parviflorus Franchet, Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat., sér. 2, 10: 89. 1887. 小花扭柄花 xiao hua niu bing hua Streptopus mairei H. Léveillé. Rhizome short, thickened. Stem usually branched distally, 20–50 cm, glabrous. Leaves lanceolate to ovate-lanceolate, 4–8 × 1.5–4 cm, thinly papery, base cordate, margin entire, apex acuminate. Peduncle 2.5–4 cm, glabrous, neither jointed nor geniculate, 1- or 2-flowered. Flowers nodding. Tepals white, lanceolate, 6.5–8 × 1–2 mm. Stamens 3–3.5 mm; filaments 1.8– 2.2 mm; anthers ca. 1 mm. Style ca. 2.5 mm, slightly longer than ovary; stigma 3-lobed. Berry 5–8 mm in diam., many seeded. Seeds oblong, curved. Fl. Jun, fr. Aug–Sep. • Forests, thickets, alpine grasslands; 2000–3500 m. SW Sichuan, NW Yunnan. Flora of China 24: 153–154. 2000. .
Recommended publications
  • Breeding Ecology of Kittlitz's Murrelet at Agattu Island, Alaska, in 2010
    AMNWR 2011/01 BREEDING ECOLOGY OF KITTLITZ’S MURRELET AT AGATTU ISLAND, ALASKA, IN 2010: PROGRESS REPORT Photo: R. Kaler/USFWS 1 2 1 1 3 Robb S. A. Kaler , Leah A. Kenney , Jeffrey C. Williams , G. Vernon Byrd , and John F. Piatt Key Words: Alaska, Aleutian Islands, Brachyramphus brevirostris, breeding ecology, growth rates, Kittlitz’s murrelet, Near Islands, nest site selection, parental provisioning, reproductive success. 1Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge 95 Sterling Highway, Suite 1 Homer, Alaska 99603 2Department of Biological Sciences University of Alaska Anchorage Anchorage, Alaska 99501 3Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey 4210 University Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Cite as: Kaler, R.S.A., L.A. Kenney, J.C. Williams, G.V. Byrd, and J.F. Piatt. 2011. Breeding biology of Kittlitz’s murrelet at Agattu Island, Alaska, in 2010: progress report. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep. AMNWR 2011/01. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 3 STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................................. 4 METHODS .................................................................................................................................... 4 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2010 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List 2016
    Established 1990 PLANT LIST 2016 European mail order website www.crug-farm.co.uk CRÛG FARM PLANTS • 2016 Welcome to our 2016 list hope we can tempt you with plenty of our old favourites as well as some exciting new plants that we have searched out on our travels. There has been little chance of us standing still with what has been going on here in 2015. The year started well with the birth of our sixth grandchild. January into February had Sue and I in Colombia for our first winter/early spring expedition. It was exhilarating, we were able to travel much further afield than we had previously, as the mountainous areas become safer to travel. We are looking forward to working ever closer with the Colombian institutes, such as the Medellin Botanic Gardens whom we met up with. Consequently we were absent from the RHS February Show at Vincent Square. We are finding it increasingly expensive participating in the London shows, while re-branding the RHS February Show as a potato event hardly encourages our type of customer base to visit. A long standing speaking engagement and a last minute change of date, meant that we missed going to Fota near Cork last spring, no such problem this coming year. We were pleasantly surprised at the level of interest at the Trgrehan Garden Rare Plant Fair, in Cornwall. Hopefully this will become an annual event for us, as well as the Cornwall Garden Society show in April. Poor Sue went through the wars having to have a rush hysterectomy in June, after some timely results revealed future risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing History
    Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 911 Tracing History Phylogenetic, Taxonomic, and Biogeographic Research in the Colchicum Family BY ANNIKA VINNERSTEN ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS UPPSALA 2003 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Lindahlsalen, EBC, Uppsala, Friday, December 12, 2003 at 10:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Vinnersten, A. 2003. Tracing History. Phylogenetic, Taxonomic and Biogeographic Research in the Colchicum Family. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 911. 33 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 91-554-5814-9 This thesis concerns the history and the intrafamilial delimitations of the plant family Colchicaceae. A phylogeny of 73 taxa representing all genera of Colchicaceae, except the monotypic Kuntheria, is presented. The molecular analysis based on three plastid regions—the rps16 intron, the atpB- rbcL intergenic spacer, and the trnL-F region—reveal the intrafamilial classification to be in need of revision. The two tribes Iphigenieae and Uvularieae are demonstrated to be paraphyletic. The well-known genus Colchicum is shown to be nested within Androcymbium, Onixotis constitutes a grade between Neodregea and Wurmbea, and Gloriosa is intermixed with species of Littonia. Two new tribes are described, Burchardieae and Tripladenieae, and the two tribes Colchiceae and Uvularieae are emended, leaving four tribes in the family. At generic level new combinations are made in Wurmbea and Gloriosa in order to render them monophyletic. The genus Androcymbium is paraphyletic in relation to Colchicum and the latter genus is therefore expanded.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally Sensitive Areas Guidance Document
    New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Release Prevention ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Revised September 2014 Introduction This guidance on environmentally sensitive areas is intended for use as a reference and a guide when gathering information to be used in preparing the topographical maps for Discharge Prevention, Containment and Countermeasure (DPCC), and Discharge Cleanup and Removal (DCR) Plans. It gathers in one place all the citations listed in N.J.A.C. 7:1E-1.8, which establishes the definition of environmentally sensitive areas (ESA) for the purpose of developing the DPCC/DCR plan. The areas described in this document are by no means the only ESA in New Jersey, but represent those most likely to be adversely affected by a discharge of a hazardous substance. When used in conjunction with the requirements of N.J.A.C. 7:1E-4.10, Mapping criteria, it will prove useful in preparing the topographical maps and the offsite response measures that are required as part of the DCR plan. Additional information concerning the certification of ESA information is available in A Guide to the Preparation of Discharge Prevention, Containment and Countermeasure (DPCC) and Discharge Cleanup and Removal (DCR) Plans and Plan Renewals, available on the Bureau of Release Prevention website at http://www.nj.gov/dep/rpp/brp/dp/index.htm. N.J.A.C. 7:1E-4.2(b)9 requires that topographical maps be included in the DPCC plan, while N.J.A.C. 7:1E-4.10(d) requires that these maps cover all surrounding areas which could be affected by a discharge from the facility, including ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Liliaceae Lily Family
    Liliaceae lily family While there is much compelling evidence available to divide this polyphyletic family into as many as 25 families, the older classification sensu Cronquist is retained here. Page | 1222 Many are familiar as garden ornamentals and food plants such as onion, garlic, tulip and lily. The flowers are showy and mostly regular, three-merous and with a superior ovary. Key to genera A. Leaves mostly basal. B B. Flowers orange; 8–11cm long. Hemerocallis bb. Flowers not orange, much smaller. C C. Flowers solitary. Erythronium cc. Flowers several to many. D D. Leaves linear, or, absent at flowering time. E E. Flowers in an umbel, terminal, numerous; leaves Allium absent. ee. Flowers in an open cluster, or dense raceme. F F. Leaves with white stripe on midrib; flowers Ornithogalum white, 2–8 on long peduncles. ff. Leaves green; flowers greenish, in dense Triantha racemes on very short peduncles. dd. Leaves oval to elliptic, present at flowering. G G. Flowers in an umbel, 3–6, yellow. Clintonia gg. Flowers in a one-sided raceme, white. Convallaria aa. Leaves mostly cauline. H H. Leaves in one or more whorls. I I. Leaves in numerous whorls; flowers >4cm in diameter. Lilium ii. Leaves in 1–2 whorls; flowers much smaller. J J. Leaves 3 in a single whorl; flowers white or purple. Trillium jj. Leaves in 2 whorls, or 5–9 leaves; flowers yellow, small. Medeola hh. Leaves alternate. K K. Flowers numerous in a terminal inflorescence. L L. Plants delicate, glabrous; leaves 1–2 petiolate. Maianthemum ll. Plant coarse, robust; stems pubescent; leaves many, clasping Veratrum stem.
    [Show full text]
  • Streptopus Lanceolatus (Rosy Twisted-Stalk)
    Streptopus lanceolatus Rosy Twisted-Stalk Liliaceae Streptopus lanceolatus by Rob Routledge (CC BY 3.0) Streptopus lanceolatus Rare Plant Profile New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Parks and Forestry New Jersey Forest Service Office of Natural Lands Management New Jersey Natural Heritage Program 501 East State Street P.O. Box 420 Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 Prepared by: Rebekah Buczynski [email protected] August 21, 2019 This report should be cited as follows: Buczynski, Rebekah. 2019. Streptopus lanceolatus Rare Plant Profile. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Forest Service, Office of Natural Lands Management, New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Trenton, NJ. 15 pp. Streptopus lanceolatus Rare Plant Profile, Page 2 of 15 Introduction Rosy Twisted-stalk is a NJ state endangered plant whose name can arguably be attributed to either its zigzag stem (Peterson and McKenny 1968 and Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center 2019 [hereafter, "LBJWC"]) or perhaps more accurately the arching angle of the flowering stalks (LBJWC 2019; Minnesota Wildflowers 2019 [hereafter, "MNWF"]). The translation of the Latin genus Streptopus is literally "Twisted foot" (USDA U.S. Forest Service 2019). One of the common names, "Scootberry" possibly refers to the purgative effect of consuming too much of the fruit (Flowering Plants in Voyageur Country 2007). Another point of taxonomic contention with this species is that Streptopus lanceolatus may be divided into several subordinate taxa depending upon where it exists in its range (MNWF 2019) but for the purposes of this profile we will simply refer to all variations as Streptopus lanceolatus.
    [Show full text]
  • 25. DISPORUM Salisbury Ex D. Don, Prodr. Fl. Nepal. 50. 1825. 万寿竹属 Wan Shou Zhu Shu Liang Songyun (梁松筠 Liang Song-Jun); Minoru N
    Flora of China 24: 154–158. 2000. 25. DISPORUM Salisbury ex D. Don, Prodr. Fl. Nepal. 50. 1825. 万寿竹属 wan shou zhu shu Liang Songyun (梁松筠 Liang Song-jun); Minoru N. Tamura Drapiezia Blume. Herbs perennial, often shortly rhizomatous, sometimes long stoloniferous, often glabrous, sometimes scabrous. Roots fleshy. Stem erect, simple or branched in distal part, with 1 to several sheaths proximally. Leaves concentrated in distal part of stem, alter- nate, often shortly petiolate, sometimes sessile, linear to suborbicular, 3–7-veined. Inflorescences terminal or pseudolateral (terminal on a short, lateral branchlet opposite a leaf), umbellate or with flowers paired or solitary; bract absent. Flowers bisexual, often nod- ding, sometimes horizontal, tubular-campanulate to opening flat. Tepals 6, free, white, greenish, yellow, pink, dark red, or dark pur- ple, often saccate or spurred at base. Stamens 6, inserted at base of tepals; filaments usually slightly flat; anthers basifixed to innate, extrorse. Ovary 3-loculed; ovules 2–6 per locule. Style filiform, 3-lobed to 3-fid apically with ± recurved lobes. Fruit a berry, dark blue to black, 2(–6)-seeded. Seeds globose or ovoid. Twenty species: Bhutan, China, India, Japan, Korea, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Russia, Sikkim, Thailand, Vietnam; 14 species (eight endemic) in China. The North American genus Prosartes D. Don has often been included in Disporum, but recent micromorphological, karyological, phytochemical, and molecular phylogenetic studies indicate that separation of the two genera is appropriate. 1a. Inflorescences all or at least partly pseudolateral (terminal on a short, lateral branchlet opposite a leaf). 2a. Tepals long spurred, spurs cylindric, often slightly recurved, 4–5(–8) mm ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting the Invasion Potential of the Lily Leaf Beetle, Lilioceris Lilii Scopoli (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in North America
    insects Article Predicting the Invasion Potential of the Lily Leaf Beetle, Lilioceris lilii Scopoli (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in North America Maggie Freeman 1,2,*, Chris Looney 1, Marina J. Orlova-Bienkowskaja 3 and David W. Crowder 4 1 Washington State Department of Agriculture, 1111 Washington St. SE, Olympia, WA 98504, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Hood River, OR 97031, USA 3 A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 33 Leninskii pr., Moscow 119071, Russia; [email protected] 4 Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 August 2020; Accepted: 21 August 2020; Published: 23 August 2020 Simple Summary: The lily leaf beetle, Lilioceris lilii Scopoli (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), is an invasive pest of cultivated and native lilies (Liliaceae). This Eurasian beetle was introduced to North America in 1943, and can now be found in nine provinces and 14 states. The lily leaf beetle has already been found feeding and reproducing on several eastern species of native lilies. To help predict where L. lillii will be able to establish in North America and which native Liliaceae species will be vulnerable to attack, a habitat suitability model was created. This model uses specimen location data along with environmental data to produce habitat suitability estimates between 0 (low suitability) and 1 (high suitability). Model results indicate that the beetle should be able to establish throughout the range of most North American Liliaceae, including species of special conservation concern. With the increased utilization of habitat suitability models in conservation management, this model should be consulted, to help plan preemptive monitoring and control efforts for L.
    [Show full text]
  • Disporum Megalanthum Question Number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the Species Highly Domesticated? N 0
    Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening new plants for invasiveness. Conservation Letters 1: 227-235. Available at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/121448369/PDFSTART Disporum megalanthum Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species have weedy races? 2.01 Species suited to U.S. climates (USDA hardiness zones; 0-low, 1- 2 intermediate, 2-high) 2.02 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) 2 2.03 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y 1 2.04 Native or naturalized in regions with an average of 11-60 inches of annual y 1 precipitation 2.05 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its ? natural range? 3.01 Naturalized beyond native range n -1 3.02 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n 0 3.03 Weed of agriculture n 0 3.04 Environmental weed n 0 3.05 Congeneric weed n 0 4.01 Produces spines, thorns or burrs n 0 4.02 Allelopathic 4.03 Parasitic n 0 4.04 Unpalatable to grazing animals 4.05 Toxic to animals n 0 4.06 Host for recognised pests and pathogens 4.07 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans 4.08 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems 4.09 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle 4.1 Grows on one or more of the following soil types: alfisols, entisols, or y 1
    [Show full text]
  • XXXIII. a Monograph of the Genus Disporum. by DAVIDDON, Esq., Libr
    [ 513 3 XXXIII. A Monograph of the Genus Disporum. By DAVIDDON, Esq., Libr. L.S., Prof. Bot. King’s Coll. Lond. Read November 19th, 1839. TO Mr. Brown is due the nierit of having first pointed out the chief cha- racters of this genus, and among others its binary ovula, which doubtless suggested to Salisbury the name of Disporum, subsequently given to it by that botanist in a list of Petaloid Monocotyledons, printed in the first volume of the Transactions of the Horticultural Society of London. The genus, however, remained undescribed, and almost unnoticed, until the publication of my little work on the plants of Nepal, in which I gave a detailed descrip- tion of it, and added to it two other species, namely, the Uvularia Pitsutu of Buchanan Hamilton, and the Uvularia parvifora of Wallich. Sir J. E. Smith. in an article appended to that on Uvularia, and inserted in the 30th volume of Rees’s Cyclopaedia, has referred the former plant to Michaux’s, or rather Richard‘s genus Streptopus, with the name of peduncularis. To this view of its affinities he was most probably led by the account of the fruit given by Buchanan Hamilton in his manuscript notes, for the specimen of the plant from that learned botanist in the Smithian Herbarium is without fruit. The characters of the genus consist in its campanulate perianthium, with the sepals produced into a short pouch or spur at the base, in the cells of its ovariurrl bearing two ovula, in its baccate pericarpiuni, and in its umbellate inflo- rescence.
    [Show full text]