DOCSLIB.ORG

Freight Integration Analysis August 17, 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freight Integration Analysis August 17, 2006 South Florida East Coast Rail Corridor Transit Analysis Final DRAFT Technical Memorandum Task 2.20: Freight Integration Analysis August 17, 2006 Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation Prepared by: Boston, Massachusetts Under Contract to: Miami, Florida [This Page Intentionally Blank.] Operating Alternatives for Freight Traffic Dade to Palm – SFECC Study Final DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary of Findings..................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 SFRC Freight Spine ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Western Bypass................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Comparative Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.1 Freight Operations and Train Movements...................................................................................... 10 2.3.2 New Infrastructure Required......................................................................................................... 11 2.3.3 Highway Safety ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.3.4 Economics.................................................................................................................................... 13 2.3.5 Competitive and Institutional Concerns......................................................................................... 13 3. The Status Quo............................................................................................................................. 15 3.1 The FEC Mainline ............................................................................................................................ 15 3.1.1 Freight Operations and Train Movements...................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Infrastructure Needs...................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.3 Highway Safety ............................................................................................................................ 21 3.1.4 Economics.................................................................................................................................... 22 3.2 The SFRC Mainline........................................................................................................................... 22 3.2.1 Freight Operations and Train Movements...................................................................................... 23 3.2.2 Infrastructure Needs...................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.3 Highway Safety ............................................................................................................................ 25 3.2.4 Economics.................................................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Status Quo Competitive and Institutional Concerns........................................................................... 27 3.3.1 Competition.................................................................................................................................. 27 3.3.2 Institutional................................................................................................................................... 28 4. SFRC Freight Spine ..................................................................................................................... 29 4.1 Freight Operations and Train Movements......................................................................................... 30 4.2 Infrastructure Needs ......................................................................................................................... 44 4.3 Highway Safety................................................................................................................................. 46 4.4 Economics ........................................................................................................................................ 48 4.5 Competitive and Institutional Considerations.................................................................................... 52 4.6 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 53 5. The Western Bypass (WBP)......................................................................................................... 54 5.1 Freight Operations and Train Movements......................................................................................... 54 5.2 Infrastructure Needs ......................................................................................................................... 57 5.3 Highway safety ................................................................................................................................. 61 5.4 Economics ........................................................................................................................................ 62 5.5 Competition and Institutional Concerns ............................................................................................ 64 5.6 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 65 Appendix A: Train Pathing Concepts................................................................................................... 68 Appendix B: Analysis of Relief Crews................................................................................................. 70 Appendix C: Competitive Market Balance Between FEC and CSX...................................................... 74 Appendix D: Written Comments Reveiced from Stakeholders ............................................................. 75 Appendix E and F: Stringlines for the SFRC Spine and for the Proposed Western Bypass ................... 77 Edwards and Kelcey Page 3 of 86 – 8/17/2006 Operating Alternatives for Freight Traffic Dade to Palm – SFECC Study Final DRAFT TASK 2.20 FREIGHT INTEGRATION ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION To support the development and evaluation of passenger transportation service alternatives along the SFECC, a narrowly defined freight integration analysis has been prepared for the FEC and SFRC/CSXT corridors. The primary objective of the freight integration analysis is to identify and explore options available to shift or restructure freight operations in the event that proposed passenger services present substantial conflicts with current and future freight use of the lines. The analysis considers the physical, operational, competitive, economic and institutional viability of configuring the region’s rail freight network in several ways. Three scenarios/options are presented in this document. 1. Status Quo – No substantial change in SFRC/CSXT and FEC rights and networks. Maintain the FEC and SFRC/CSXT railways as two independent freight corridors, similar to current conditions. 2. SFRC Freight Spine – Improve connections between FEC and SFRC/CSXT to allow through mainline FEC operations between Miami and Palm Beach to be shifted to the SFRC/CSXT line while maintaining access to FEC yards, ports and FEC online customers. 3. Western Bypass (WBP) – Develop a new freight rail route along the Route 27 right of way. The new route would be used by all through freights to and from CSXT and FEC Hialeah yards. All scenarios assume that SFRTA’s present plans for increased passenger service and capacity on the SFRC would remain in force. At this point in the analysis, no passenger operations on the FEC or substantial changes in intercity rail service are assumed. For all integration scenarios the analysis assumes that mainlines freed from through freight operations would be maintained in a manner that would allow freight carriers to temporarily shift operations onto the line as backup in the event of a line blockage or other emergency. Edwards and Kelcey Page 4 of 86 – 8/17/2006 Operating Alternatives for Freight Traffic Dade to Palm – SFECC Study Final DRAFT For the purposes of this analysis, the SFRC refers to the former Seaboard Air Line (SAL) alignment through southern Florida between Mileposts SX 1036.5 and SX 965.0, a point near the south end of CSXT Dyer siding. The CSXT mainline refers to the SAL alignment north of that point, from SX 965.0 north to Jacksonville and beyond. The FEC mainline is the entire 371• mile alignment between FEC’s Hialeah Yard and FEC’s Bowden Yard in Jacksonville. SFECC refers to a segment of the FEC between downtown Miami on the Miami Port Industrial Lead (Milepost PL 6.2), Little River Junction (Milepost 360.7 on the mainline), and Jupiter, Fla. in Northern Palm Beach County (MP 283.3). The Western Bypass (WBP) is a proposed extension between 116th Way and South Bay, Fla., via Andytown, Deem City, and Okeelanta along the U.S. Route 27 corridor. This proposed new route connects to the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tri-Rail 2013 On-Board Survey
    TRI-RAIL 2013 ON-BOARD SURVEY Prepared for: July 2013 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority 800 NW 33rd Street Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Prepared by: HNTB Corporation 8700 West Flagler Street, Suite 402 Miami, FL 33174 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Scope of the Effort ........................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Previous Tri-Rail Surveys .................................................................................................. 3 2.0 SURVEY DESIGN ............................................................................................. 4 2.1 Sampling Plan ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Survey Instrument ............................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Overview / Comparison to Previous Survey Results ................................................................................ 7 2.2.2 Pretest ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 MINIMIZATION/MITIGATION OF NON-RESPONSE BIAS ................................. 9 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................... 10 4.1 Training ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aware Pilot Project Along South Florida Rail Corridor
    AWARE PILOT PROJECT ALONG SOUTH FLORIDA RAIL CORRIDOR FINAL PROJECT REPORT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT # BC498 AMENDMENT #2 Prepared by: Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc. Report Date: June 4, 2002 400 Massasoit Ave. Suite 200 East Providence, RI 02914 Telephone: 401-434-5522 Fax: 401-434-5809 Internet: www.nestor.com Copyright © 2002, Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................. 1-5 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................. 2-1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (AS PROPOSED)...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2018/2019 to 2022/2023
    2019 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2018/2019 TO 2022/2023 TIP Citizen’s Version TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION FOR THE MIAMI URBANIZED AREA 2019 – 2023 CITIZENS TIP This document was prepared by the Transportation Planning Organization for the Miami Urbanized Area in collaboration with the Florida Department of Transportation; Miami-Dade Expressway Authority; Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise; South Florida Regional Transportation Authority; Miami-Dade County Office of Strategic Business Management; Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works, Miami-Dade County Aviation Department; Miami-Dade Seaport Department; Miami-Dade League of Cities; Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources; and the Miami-Dade County Developmental Impact Committee. The Miami-Dade TPO complies with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states: No person in the United States shall, on grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. It is also the policy of the Miami-Dade TPO to comply with all of the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. For materials in accessible format please call (305) 375-4507. The preparation of this report has been financed in part from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) through the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and/or the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the State Planning and Research Program (Section 505 of Title 23, U.S. Code) and Miami-Dade County, Florida. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Florida Rail System Plan: Investment Element
    The Florida Rail System Plan: Investment Element prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. With support from Planning Innovations, Inc Quandel Consultants December 2010 Florida Department of Transportation CHARLIE CRIST " STEPHANIE C. KOPELOUSOS 605 Suwannee Street GOVERNOR Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 SECRETARY December 14, 2010 Citizens of Florida: I am pleased to submit to you the Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan. Unlike in past years, where the Florida Rail System Plan was more descriptive of the separate freight and passenger rail systems, this plan is more visionary, strategic, and policy-driven. The plan was guided by a broad base of stakeholders, including the Rail Stakeholder Advisory Committee, members of the public and private sectors, modes of transportation, economic development and environmental interests, and citizen representatives. The Committee and others worked throughout the summer and fall of 2009 to develop an inventory of Florida's rail system needs and recommend priority investments that support the strategic goals, objectives, and policies of the Florida Rail System Plan. The Florida Rail System Plan is comprised of a Policy Element and this document, the Investment Element. The Policy Element provides a broad policy framework for the investment of limited state resources in Florida's rail system. The Investment Element builds upon the framework of the Policy Element by identifying the needs of Florida's rail system, establishing priorities for the investment of state funds, and setting forth future action steps necessary to implement the plan. Florida in the year 2030 will be shaped by the actions, decisions, and policy choices made today.
    [Show full text]
  • Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan Technical Memorandum #1 – Existing Conditions
    Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan Technical Memorandum #1 – Existing Conditions August 2015 Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan – Technical Memorandum #1 1 Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 Planning Context ............................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Relevant Plans and Policies ............................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Land Use and Development Pattern .............................................................................................. 20 3.3 Transportation Network ................................................................................................................ 21 3.4 Utilities ............................................................................................................................................ 29 4.0 Regulatory Environment ............................................................................................................... 37 4.1 Existing Land Use and Zoning ......................................................................................................... 37 4.2 Future Land Use and Zoning ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0 Passenger Rail Services and Initiatives in Florida
    Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 3.0 Passenger Rail Services and Initiatives in Florida 3.1 Overview Although Florida’s total population shrunk by about 60,000 residents in 2009 – a first in over three decades according to state demographers – and overall population growth rates have declined three points to approximately 2 percent annually due in large part to the nationwide recession and declining housing market, the State is expected to continue to attract retirees and residents looking for warmer weather and low costs of living. State demographers at the University of Florida predict that once the recession ends, Florida can expect to grow as much as 200,000 people per year – fewer than the 300,000 a year the State averaged during the past three decades, but enough to lead most other states in net growth. By 2035, more than 25 million people will call Florida home, representing a 56 percent increase between 2000 and 2035.45 In absolute terms, Florida will add over 9 million people to its population between this time period. Furthermore, although much of Florida’s growth will be concentrated in urbanized areas, growth will occur across Florida’s regions and urbanized area boundaries will expand across county lines. Florida’s density per square mile was 344 according to the 2009 Census and was ranked the eighth densest state in the nation. Population growth, and the associated transportation demand, will place additional pressure on all aspects of the State’s transportation system. A growing population not only adds automobiles to roadways, but the increase in economic activity to support this population also will generate additional demands for freight movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Intermodal System Urban Fixed Guideway
    Strategic Intermodal System Urban Fixed Guideway To plan for an efficient and safe Urban Fixed Guideway Terminals in Florida transportation network in Florida, Located Serves SIS Integrated Co-located with the state legislature and Florida Facility Name District System Designation at or near air, sea, or with other major Park-&- termini spaceport SIS system Ride Facility Department of Transportation (FDOT) DeLand Station* 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No No No developed the Strategic Intermodal DeBary Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub Yes No No No System (SIS). As part of the SIS, there Sanford Auto Train Track Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No are specific elements Lake Mary Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No that have been identified as critical to Longwood Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No the economic success of Florida. Altamonte Springs Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No Maitland Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No One of these elements are Urban Fixed Winter Park / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No Yes No Guideway (UFG) terminals, which Advent Health Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No No Yes serve as hubs and stations for the urban Lynx Central Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No fixed guideways throughout Florida. Church Street Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No Orlando Health / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No Yes No The adjacent table lists the UFG Sand Lake Road 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No terminals within Florida and whether Meadow Woods Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No they are designated as a SIS Hub or Tupperware Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No SIS Station, based on criteria defined Kissimmee / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No by FDOT.
    [Show full text]
  • South Florida Regional Transportation Authority Regular Meeting Agenda March 23, 2018
    REVISED 03/21/18 SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GOVERNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING AGENDA MARCH 23, 2018 9:30 a.m. South Florida Regional Transportation Authority Board Room 801 NW 33rd Street Pompano Beach, FL 33064 SFRTA BOARD MEETINGS ARE SCHEDULED ON THE FOURTH FRIDAY OF EACH MONTH AT 9:30 A.M. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL (954)942-RAIL (7245). TIME OF MEETINGS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. SFRTA Board Members Commissioner Steven L. Abrams, Chair Commissioner Bruno Barreiro, Vice-Chair Andrew Frey Frank Frione Nick Inamdar Stacy L. Miller F. Martin Perry Commissioner Tim Ryan James A. Scott Robert C.L. Vaughan Executive Director Jack L. Stephens 1 GOVERNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 23, 2018 The meeting will convene at 9:30 a.m., and will be held in the Board Room of the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority, Administrative Offices, 801 NW 33rd Street, Pompano Beach, Florida 33064. CALL TO ORDER MOMENT OF SILENCE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA APPROVAL – Additions, Deletions, Revisions MATTERS BY THE PUBLIC – Persons wishing to address the Board are requested to complete an “Appearance Card” and will be limited to three (3) minutes. Please see the Minutes Clerk prior to the meeting. CONSENT AGENDA Those matters included under the Consent Agenda are self-explanatory and are not expected to require review or discussion. Items will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. If discussion is desired by any Board Member, however, that item may be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. C1. MOTION TO APPROVE: Minutes of Governing Board’s Regular Meeting of February 23, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Improvement Program Citizens Version
    Metr a op e o r l A it d a e n z i P n l a a n b n r i n U i g m O a i r g M a e n h i t z a r o t i f o n Table of Contents Page(s) # Message to the Reader 3 About this document 3 What it the TIP 3 TIP: Putting the Long Range Transportation Plan into Action 3 Some Basic Facts about Miami-Dade County 4 The TIP’s Mechanichs: Why is there a TIP? 5 Who prepares the TIP? 5 How does the TIP work? 5 TIP Consistency 6 What fiscal years does the TIP include? 6 What does the TIP include? 6 Who participates in putting the TIP together? 6 Transportation and Air Quality go hand in hand 6 The TIP’s Technicalities: Who must approve the TIP locally? 7 Who must approve the TIP at the State level? 7 Who must approve the TIP at the federal level? 7 Where does the MPO gets its authority? 7 TIP Program Funding: Where does Highway funding comes from? 7 Where does Transit funding comes from? 7 Primary State Highways and Intermodal Projects 8, 9, 10 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) 11, 12, 13 Florida’s Turnpike District Improvements 14 Secondary Road Improvements 15 Road Impact Fee Improvements 16 Local Option Gas Tax (LOGT) Improvements 17, 18 Private Sector Improvements 19 Airport Development Improvements 20, 21 Multimodal Seaport Development 22, 23, 24 Public Transportation Improvements 25, 26 1 Table of Contents (Continued) Page(s) # Tri-County Commuter Rail (Tri-Rail) System 27, 28 APPENDIX A: Completed Highway Projects 29 FY 2002 Completed Projects - Florida Department of Transportation District 6 30 FY 2003 Completed Projects - Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) 31 FY 2002 Completed Projects – Miami-Dade County Public Works Department 32 APPENDIX B: Under Construction Highway Projects 33 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) 34, 35 Miami-Dade County Public Works Department 36 Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise 37 2 A CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) MESSAGE TO THE READER Thank you for your interest and participation in the Miami Urban Area transportation planning process and in particular the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
    [Show full text]
  • RAIL SYSTEM PLAN December 2018 Table of Contents
    2015 FLORIDA RAIL SYSTEM PLAN December 2018 Table of Contents FLORIDA RAIL SYSTEM PLAN - 2018 UPDATE The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Freight and Multimodal Operations Office (FMO) present this 2018 update of the 2015 Florida Rail System Plan. As new challenges have had a great impact on the needs and future projects identified in the 2015 Rail System Plan, FDOT prepared this update. CHALLENGES • New State Rail Plan Guidance was created in 2013 to set a standard format and elaborate on required elements of the plan to include a 5-year update cycle, and a requirement for states seeking capital grants under Sections 301, 302, and 501. See https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0511. Thereafter, FDOT prepared a 2015 Rail System Plan that was completed in December 2015. The Plan was not published at that time, as major industry changes were expected and no public outreach had yet been conducted. • Major industry changes occurred that impacted most of the rail mileage in Florida: o CSX hired Hunter Harrison in spring of 2017, and radically changed the company by imposing precision-scheduled railroading instead of a hub-and-spoke system. This approach has been continued by CSX leadership through 2018. o Grupo México Transportes (GMXT), the leading rail freight transportation company in Mexico, successfully completed the acquisition of Florida East Coast Railway in 2017. o Brightline began service in 2018 between West Palm Beach, Ft. Lauderdale, and Miami later in the year, and with plans to connect to Orlando and potentially to Tampa in the future. APPROACH • The FAST Act (Title 49, Section 22702) passage in December 2015 changed the 5-year update cycle to a 4-year update cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • TRI-RAIL Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    TRI-RAIL train time schedule & line map TRI-RAIL Tri-Rail View In Website Mode The TRI-RAIL train line (Tri-Rail) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) North: 4:15 AM - 9:40 PM (2) South: 4:00 AM - 8:40 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest TRI-RAIL train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next TRI-RAIL train arriving. Direction: North TRI-RAIL train Time Schedule 18 stops North Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 5:17 AM - 9:42 PM Monday 4:15 AM - 9:40 PM Miami Airport Station Tuesday 4:15 AM - 9:40 PM Hialeah Market Station Seaboard Drive, Hialeah Wednesday 4:15 AM - 9:40 PM Tri-Rail/Metrorail Transfer Station Thursday 4:15 AM - 9:40 PM 125 E 21st St, Hialeah Friday 4:15 AM - 9:40 PM Opa-Locka Station Saturday 5:17 AM - 9:42 PM 771 Burlington St, Opa-locka Golden Glades Station Hollywood Station TRI-RAIL train Info Direction: North Sheridan Street Station Stops: 18 Trip Duration: 120 min Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport Line Summary: Miami Airport Station, Hialeah at Dania Beach Station Market Station, Tri-Rail/Metrorail Transfer Station, Opa-Locka Station, Golden Glades Station, Fort Lauderdale Station Hollywood Station, Sheridan Street Station, Fort 200 Southwest 21st Terrace, Fort Lauderdale Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport at Dania Beach Station, Fort Lauderdale Station, Cypress Cypress Creek Station Creek Station, Pompano Beach Station, Deerƒeld Beach Station, Boca Raton Station, Delray Beach Pompano Beach Station Station, Boynton Beach Station, Lake Worth Station,
    [Show full text]
  • South Florida Regional Transportation Authority Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT A Component Unit of the State of Florida Department of Transportation FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2018 Prepared by Finance Department Accounting Division JACK L. STEPHENS C. MIKEL OGLESBY Executive Director Deputy Executive Director RICHARD D. CHESS, MBA MARGARET DALLEY-JOHNS, CPA Director of Finance Accounting Manager This page is intentionally left blank MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Fiscal Year 2018 brought with it challenges and accomplishments. In May, the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) officially dedicated its new Operations Center and adjacent Pompano Beach Station, increased ridership, and achieved record on-time-performance. The move to the new headquarters has enabled SFRTA to consolidate virtually all of its functions, including operations, dispatching, administration and outreach into one facility. This has significantly enhanced communications and has enabled the SFRTA to more effectively and efficiently serve its passengers. With the South Florida economic climate continuing to show improvement, we are continuing to see ridership in excess of 4 million passengers annually. More than 1 million passengers availed themselves of our free connecting shuttle service during the past fiscal year. SFRTA continues to operate 50 trains each weekday and 30 trains on Saturday, Sunday and holidays. In fact, at a time when transit systems across the country have shown a loss of riders, SFRTA has continued to maintain its ridership and, in fact, has seen a slight growth in passengers. An exciting development on the horizon is a partnership with All Aboard Florida (AAF) which will provide a one-seat ride into downtown Miami.
    [Show full text]