DOCSLIB.ORG

I.T.U. Ve Muhendislik Tarihimiz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I.T.U. Ve Muhendislik Tarihimiz EDİTÖR MEHMET KARACA MUSTAFA KAÇAR, TUNCAY ZORLU, BURAK BARUTÇU, ATİLLA BİR, C. OZAN CEYHAN ve ARAS NEFTÇİ İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ VE MÜHENDİSLİK TARİHİMİZ EDİTÖR MEHMET KARACA HAZIRLAYANLAR MUSTAFA KAÇAR, TUNCAY ZORLU, BURAK BARUTÇU, ATİLLA BİR, C. OZAN CEYHAN ve ARAS NEFTÇİ 2012 İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ VE MÜHENDİSLİK TARİHİMİZ 1. Basım: Mayıs 2012 ISBN: 978–605–125–537-8 Yayımcı : Mehmet Karaca İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Maden Fakültesi Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü ve Avrasya Yer Bilimleri Enstitüsü Maslak, 34469, İstanbul Editör : Mehmet Karaca Yazarlar/Metin : Mustafa Kaçar, Tuncay Zorlu, Burak Barutçu, Atilla Bir, C. Ozan Ceyhan ve Aras Neftçi Grafik/Tasarım : Yavuz Dürüst Baskı : Mavi Ofset Mavi Ofset Basım Yayın Sanayi Tic. Ltd. Şti. İkitelli Organize Sanayi Bölgesi, Eskoop Sanayi Sitesi C1 Blok Başakşehir, İstanbul Tel: 212 549 25 30 Kapak Resimleri: Zeminde: “Keşfiyat ve İnşaat Türk Anonim Şirketi Haritası, (Ortaköy paftası)”, ön kapakta: “Dönemin Milli Eğitim Bakanı Hasan Âli Yücel İTÜ’yü açarken (1944)”, sırtta: “Mehmed Said Efendi’nin icat ettiği ve Müsellesiye adını verdiği aletin çizimi”, arka kapakta üstte: “Mühendishâne-i Berrî-i Hümâyûn Şâkirdânının İmtihân-ı Umûmî Cedvelidir, 1302 / 1891-1892”, arka kapakta altta: “Mülkiye Mühendis Mektebi müntehî sınıfın Vardar Köprüsü inşaatını ziyareti, 1325 / 1909”. Her hakkı saklıdır. İçinde yer alan bilgiler kaynak gösterilerek kullanılabilir. İÇİNDEKİLER Hendesehânede Eğitim Faaliyetleri ..............................................................................72 a) Fransa Kraliyet Mühendislerinden Joseph Gabriel Monnier’nin ÖNSÖZ............................................................................................................................... 11 İstanbul’a Gelişi ..............................................................................................72 GİRİŞ ................................................................................................................................. 15 b) Lafitte-Clavé ve Joseph Gabriel Monnier’nin Tersâne ............................... Alexander Compte de Bonneval (Boneval) Ahmed Paşa ............................................36 Hendesehânesi’nde (Mühendishâne) İstihkâm Dersleri Vermeleri ..........73 Humbaracı Ocağının Kuruluşu .......................................................................................39 Lafitte-Clavé’nin Fransa’ya Geri Dönmesi ....................................................................74 Humbaracı Ocağı’nda Eğitim ve Öğretim .................................................................... 40 Gemi İnşa Mühendisi Le Roy ve Ekibinin İstanbul’a Gelişi ve Tersane-i Amire’deki Çalışmaları .................................................................................................... 77 Humbaracı Ocağında Eğitim Faaliyetleri ..................................................................... 40 4- Fransız Uzmanların İmparatorluktan Ayrılmaları...........................................79 Bonneval Ahmed Paşa’nın Diğer Faaliyetleri .............................................................. 44 5- Tersane Mühendishânesi’de Kara Mühendislik Eğitimi ............................... 82 1770 Çeşme Savaşı ......................................................................................................... 46 a) Tersâne Mühendishânesi’ne Nizam Verilmesi ...................................... 85 Baron de Tott İstanbul’da .............................................................................................. 51 b) Tersane Mühendishânesi Eğitim Öğretim Kadrosu ..............................96 1- Baron de Tott’un Osmanlı Hizmetine Girişi .....................................................53 c) Mühendishâne-i (Bahrî-i) Hümâyûn Ders Programı ............................103 2- Hendesehâne’de Eğitim ....................................................................................56 3- Topçu Mektebi’nin Kurulması ...........................................................................57 MÜHENDİSHÂNE-İ HÜMÂYÛNLARIN ORTAYA ÇIKIŞI ............................................106 4- Sürat Topçuları Ocağı’nın Kurulması ...............................................................59 Sultan III. Selim’in Saltanatı ve Reform Hareketleri İçerisinde a- Sürat Topçuları Ocağı ile Topçu Ocağı’nın Birleştirilmesi ......................62 Mühendishâneler ..........................................................................................................106 b- Sürat Topçuları Ocağı’nın Topçu Ocağı’ndan Ayrılara Yeniden Mühendishâne’nin Hasköy’deki Humbaracı Ocağı Kışlasında Açılışı ...................... 107 Teşkilatlanması ..............................................................................................63 Mühendishâne-i Berrî-i Hümâyûn ................................................................................110 5- Hendesehâne’nin (Hendese Odası) Kurulması ...............................................63 1- Mühendishâne’ye Talebe Alınması..................................................................114 2- Mühendishâne Nizamına Yeni İlaveler (1801) ................................................116 LAFITTE-CLAVÉ VE DİĞER FRANSIZ UZMAN VE SUBAYLARIN OSMANLI REFORM HAREKETİNDEKİ YERİ ................................................................67 a) Mimâr Ocağı’ndan Mühendishâne’ye Katılan Halifeler ........................118 1- Halil Hamid Paşa’nın Sadarete Gelişi ................................................................67 b) Humbaracı Ocağı’ndan Mühendishâne’ye Nakl Olunan Neferat .........119 2- Askerî Reform Konusunda Osmanlı-Fransız İşbirliği: Chabaud de la Tour, c) Lağımcı Ocağı’ndan Mühendishâne’ye Nakl Olunan Neferat .............120 Çavuş Aubert ve Ekibinin İstanbul’a Gelişi ...................................................................67 3- Mühendishâne Öğretim Kadrosunun Düzenlenmesi ..................................120 3- Lafitte-Clavé’nin İstanbul’a Gelişi ....................................................................70 4 5 4- Mühendishâne Başhocası İshak Efendi ........................................................ 129 İTÜ TARİHİNDEN BAZI UNUTULMAZ SİMALAR .....................................................200 5- Mekteb-i Harbiye .............................................................................................138 MİMAR AHMED KEMALEDDİN BEY (1870-1927): Birinci Ulusal Mimarlık Akımının Öncüsü...................................................................200 MEHMET REFİK FENMEN (1882-1951): SİVİL MÜHENDİSLİK .....................................................................................................140 Mühendis Mektebi’nin İkinci Kurucusu ..................................................................... 203 1- Turuk u Maabir (Yollar ve Geçitler) Mektebi’nin Kuruluşu .............................141 KARL von :TERZAGHİ (1883-1963): a) Turuk u Maabir Mektebi Ders programı ................................................143 Zemin Mekaniğinin Kurucusu .................................................................................... 205 b) Turuk u Maabir Mektebi Muallimleri ve İlk Talebeleri .........................144 PROF. OSMAN TEVFİK TAYLAN (1884-1976): 2- Devlet Eliyle Kurulan Mülkiye Mühendis Mektebi ........................................146 İTÜ’nün Kurucu Rektörü ..............................................................................................208 3- Darülfünün-ı Sultanî Turuk u Maabir Mektebi “Dersleri ve ORD. PROF. BURHANEDDİN SEZERAR (1886-1953): Muallimleri............................................................................................................. 147 İstanbul’u Aydınlatan Adam ....................................................................................... 209 4- Kondüktör Mektebi..........................................................................................154 ORD. PROF. EMİN HALİD ONAT(1908-1961): Anıtkabir’in Mimarı .......................................................................................................210 5- Mülkiye Mühendis Mektebi’nin (Sivil Mühendis Okulu) Kuruluşu .............. 156 ORD. PROF. DR. RATİP BERKER (1909-1997): 6- Yüksek Mühendis Mektebi’nin İstanbul Üniversitesi’ne Bağlanması Bir Matematik Dehası ................................................................................................... 212 Teşebbüsü .............................................................................................................158 PROF. FUAT KÜLÜNK (1911-1951): 7- Hendesehâne-i Mülkiye Nizamnâmesi ..........................................................183 Elektrik Fakültesi’nin İlk Dekanı .................................................................................. 213 PROF. DR. MUSTAFA İNAN (1911-1967): İTÜ’DE DERSLER VE HOCALAR ..................................................................................188 Bilimi Sanata Dönüştüren Mühendis .......................................................................... 213 Mühendishâne-i Berrî-i Hümâyûn ..............................................................................188 PROF. DR. İHSAN KETİN (1914-1995): Türkiye’de Modern Jeolojinin Kurucusu ...................................................................... 216 1908 Senesinde Okutulan Dersler, Muallimleri ve Muavinleri ..................................188 PROF. DR. KAZIM ÇEÇEN (1919-1997): Mühendishâne-i Berrî-i Hümâyûn Matbaası .............................................................194 Suların (Bey) Efendisi.....................................................................................................217
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Protection of Historical Artifacts in Ottoman Empire: the Permanent Council for the Protection of Ancient Artifactsi
    Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(2): 600-608, 2019 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070233 The Protection of Historical Artifacts in Ottoman Empire: The Permanent Council for the i Protection of Ancient Artifacts Sefa Yildirim*, Fatih Öztop Department of History, Faculty of Science and Letters, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Turkey Copyright©2019 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract The historical artifacts that reveal the social, establishment, functioning, duties and activities of the political, aesthetic, moral, architectural, etc. stages, before-said council are tried to be explained. through which the human beings have been; which transfer and reveal information from past to present and Keywords Historical Artifacts, Protection of future; which have an artistic, historical or archaeological Historical Artifacts, Council importance are very important physical elements that the present-day civilized societies protect or must protect as cultural values. Such works both strengthen the ties to the past due to the transfer of cultural heritage to existing and 1 . Introduction future generations and plays a very important role in the writing of the past through the data provided to the The first initiative for the protection of the historical researchers. The protection of the historical artifacts was artifacts in the Ottoman Empire can be considered as the under sharia laws until 1858 in Ottoman Empire, since beginning of the storage of two collections of old weapons then, some regulations were done about this issue, in the and artifacts since 1846 in the Hagia Irene Church end, The Permanent Council for the Protection of Ancient (Sertoğlu & Açık, 2013, p.160).
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNICATION and ADVERTISING This Text Is Prepared for The
    DESIGN CHRONOLOGY TURKEY COMMUNICATION AND ADVERTISING This text is prepared for the 3rd Istanbul Design Biennial ARE WE HUMAN? The Design of the Species 2 seconds, 2 days, 2 years, 200 years, 200,000 years by Gökhan Akçura and Pelin Derviş with contributions by Barış Gün and the support of Studio-X Istanbul translated by Liz Erçevik Amado, Selin Irazca Geray and Gülce Maşrabacı editorial support by Ceren Şenel, Erim Şerifoğlu graphic design by Selin Pervan COMMUNICATION AND ADVERTISING 19th CENTURY perfection of the manuscripts they see in Istanbul. Henry Caillol, who grows an interest in and learns about lithography ALAMET-İ FARİKA (TRADEMARK) in France, figures that putting this technique into practice in Let us look at the market places. The manufacturer wants to Istanbul will be a very lucrative business and talks Jacques distinguish his goods; the tradesman wants to distinguish Caillol out of going to Romania. Henry Caillol hires a teacher his shop. His medium is the sign. He wants to give the and begins to learn Turkish. After a while, also relying on the consumer a message. He is trying to call out “Recognize me”. connections they have made, they apply to the Ministry of He is hanging either a model of his product, a duplicate of War and obtain permission to found a lithographic printing the tool he is working with in front of his store, or its sign, house. They place an order for a printing press from France. one that is diferent, interesting. The tailor hangs a pair of This printing house begins to operate in the annex of the scissors and he becomes known as “the one who is good with Ministry of War (the current Istanbul University Rectorate scissors”.
    [Show full text]
  • T.C. Firat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Iletişim Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dali
    T.C. FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ İLETİŞİM BİLİMLERİ ANA BİLİM DALI TELEVİZYON DİZİLERİNDE ÜRÜN YERLEŞTİRME PERSPEKTİFİNDEN GÖRSEL OKURYAZARLIK BECERİLERİ: ELAZIĞ ÖRNEĞİ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ DANIŞMAN HAZIRLAYAN Yrd. Doç. Dr. Yasemin KILIÇARSLAN Aysel SAĞMEN Elazığ-2013 T.C. FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ İLETİŞİM BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI “TELEVİZYON DİZİLERİNDE ÜRÜN YERLEŞTİRME PERSPEKTİFİNDEN GÖRSEL OKURYAZARLIK BECERİLERİ: ELAZIĞ ÖRNEĞİ” YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ DANIŞMAN HAZIRLAYAN Yrd. Doç. Dr. Yasemin KILIÇARSLAN Aysel SAĞMEN Jürimiz,……………… tarihinde yapılan yüksek lisans tezini oy birliği / oy çokluğu ile başarılı saymıştır. Jüri Üyeleri: 1. 2. 3. F.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yönetim Kurulu’nun …………. Tarih ve ………… sayılı kararıyla bu tezin kabulü onaylanmıştır. Prof. Dr. Enver ÇAKAR Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürü II ÖZET Yüksek Lisans Tezi Televizyon Dizilerinde Ürün Yerleştirme Perspektifinden Görsel Okuryazarlık Becerileri: Elazığ Örneği Aysel SAĞMEN Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İletişim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı ELAZIĞ-2013, Sayfa: XIII+129 Günümüzde kitle iletişim araçlarından televizyon, tüketiciye ulaşma noktasında etkin olarak kullanılmaktadır. Televizyondan, tüketiciye ulaşmada en etkili yol dizilerdeki ürün yerleştirme reklamlarıdır. İletişim araçlarının ve markaların çoğalmasıyla birlikte tüketiciler yoğun bir mesaj trafiğine maruz kalmaktadır. Doğal olarak tüketiciler bu durumdan kaçmaya çalışmaktadır. Buna bağlı olarak reklamcılar, mesajlara duyarsız kalan tüketicinin dikkatini çekebilmek
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenian Genocide
    The Armenian Genocide During World War I, the Ottoman Empire carried out what most international experts and historians have concluded was one of the largest genocides in the world's history, slaughtering huge portions of its minority Armenian population. In all, over 1 million Armenians were put to death. To this day, Turkey denies the genocidal intent of these mass murders. My sense is that Armenians are suffering from what I would call incomplete mourning, and they can't complete that mourning process until their tragedy, their wounds are recognized by the descendants of the people who perpetrated it. People want to know what really happened. We are fed up with all these stories-- denial stories, and propaganda, and so on. Really the new generation want to know what happened 1915. How is it possible for a massacre of such epic proportions to take place? Why did it happen? And why has it remained one of the greatest untold stories of the 20th century? This film is made possible by contributions from John and Judy Bedrosian, the Avenessians Family Foundation, the Lincy Foundation, the Manoogian Simone Foundation, and the following. And others. A complete list is available from PBS. The Armenians. There are between six and seven million alive today, and less than half live in the Republic of Armenia, a small country south of Georgia and north of Iran. The rest live around the world in countries such as the US, Russia, France, Lebanon, and Syria. They're an ancient people who originally came from Anatolia some 2,500 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • A View of the History of the Istanbul Faculty of Medicine
    A VIEW OF THE HISTORY OF THE ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE Prof. Dr. Nuran Yıldırım The Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, the Department of History of Medicine and Ethics Attributing the roots of the Istanbul Faculty of Medicine to the Fatih Darüşşifa after a great deal of discussion, the 500th anniversary of medical education in Istanbul was celebrated in 1970. The soundest documents showing that medical education was carried out in the Fatih Dârüşşifa were the appointment papers (rüus) of medical students for the dârüşşifa in the 60 years between 1723 and 1783. These nine rüus, which were recently published, clarify that there were positions for six medical students in the dârüşşifa, and that whenever a vacancy came up, a new medical student would be appointed by the chief physician to undergo a systematic medical training. 1-Archival document concerning Ismail Efendi‟s appointment in place of Derviş Mehmet in Fatih Darüşşifa after his death. With the opening of the Süleymaniye Medical Medrese, medical education in Istanbul, which had started with the Fatih Dârüşşifa, became institutionalized. The opening of a medical medrese for the first time in the Ottoman State is accepted as being an important step in our history of medical education. The Süleymaniye Medical Medrese (Süleymaniye Tıp Medresesi) was a medrese for specializing, or a “post-graduate” course, as only students who had completed their classic medrese education could continue. Not only did the physicians that were trained join the scholarly classes, but at the same time they could be qadi or rising even to the level of sheikh-ul-Islam or grand vizier.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Country Report – Update November 2017 [3Rd Edition]
    21 November 2017 (COI up to 11th September 2017) Turkey Country Report – Update November 2017 [3rd edition] Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Main Developments since the attempted Coup d’état (July 2016) a. Overview of major legislative and political developments: i. Recent legislative developments incl. new amendments or decrees 1. State of Emergency 2. Emergency decrees a. Decree of 22 July 2016 (KHK/667) b. Decree of 25 July 2016 (KHK/668) c. Decree of 31 July 2016 (KHK/669) d. Decrees of 17 August 2016 (KHK/670 and 671) e. Decrees of 1 September 2016 (KHK/672, 673 and 674) f. Decrees of 29 October 2016 (KHK/675 and 676) g. Decrees of 22 November 2016 (KHK/677 and 678) h. Decrees of 6 January 2017 (KHK/679, 680 and 681) i. Decrees of 23 January 2017 (KHK/682, 683, 684 and 685) j. Decree of 7 February 2017 (KHK/686) k. Decree of 9 February 2017 (KHK/687) l. Decree of 29 March 2017 (KHK/688) m. Decrees of 29 April 2017 (KHK/689 and 690) n. Decree of 22 June 2017 (KHK/691) o. Decree of 14 July 2017 (KHK/692) p. Decrees of 25 August 2017 (KHK/693 and 694) 3. 2016: Observations by the Council of Europe Committee, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission 4. January – September 2017: Observations by the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly, the Council of Europe’s Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe, and the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018
    Turkey RISK & COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 2018 KNOWYOURCOUNTRY Executive Summary - Turkey Sanctions: None FAFT list of AML No Deficient Countries US Dept of State Money Laundering assessment Higher Risk Areas: Not on EU White list equivalent jurisdictions Failed States Index (Political)(Average score) Weakness in Government Legislation to combat Money Laundering Medium Risk Areas: Corruption Index (Transparency International & W.G.I.)) World Governance Indicators (Average score) Compliance of OECD Global Forum’s information exchange standard Major Investment Areas: Agriculture - products: tobacco, cotton, grain, olives, sugar beets, hazelnuts, pulses, citrus; livestock Industries: textiles, food processing, autos, electronics, mining (coal, chromate, copper, boron), steel, petroleum, construction, lumber, paper Exports - commodities: apparel, foodstuffs, textiles, metal manufactures, transport equipment Exports - partners: Germany 10.3%, Iraq 6.2%, UK 6%, Italy 5.8%, France 5%, Russia 4.4% (2011) Imports - commodities: machinery, chemicals, semi-finished goods, fuels, transport equipment Imports - partners: Russia 9.9%, Germany 9.5%, China 9%, US 6.7%, Italy 5.6%, Iran 5.2% (2011) 2 Investment Restrictions: The Government of Turkey (GOT) has developed specific strategies for 24 industrial sectors, including eight priority sectors. It has also established specific plans for physical infrastructure upgrades, as well as a major expansion of Turkey’s health, information technology, and education sectors, all of which are geared to make the Turkish workforce and companies more competitive. GOT recognizes that the domestic economy alone will not be sufficient to reach these goals and that Turkey will need to attract significant new foreign direct investment (FDI). Foreign-owned interests in the petroleum, mining, broadcasting, maritime transportation, and aviation sectors are subject to special regulatory requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Yemen As an Ottoman Frontier and Attempt to Build a Native Army: Asakir-I Hamidiye
    YEMEN AS AN OTTOMAN FRONTIER AND ATTEMPT TO BUILD A NATIVE ARMY: ASAKİR-İ HAMİDİYE by ÖNDER EREN AKGÜL Submitted to the Graduate School of Sabancı University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Sabancı University July 2014 YEMEN AS AN OTTOMAN FRONTIER AND ATTEMPT TO BUILD A NATIVE ARMY: ASAKİR-İ HAMİDİYE APPROVED BY: Selçuk Akşin Somel …………………………. (Thesis Supervisor) Yusuf Hakan Erdem …………………………. Bahri Yılmaz …………………………. DATE OF APPROVAL: 25.07.2014 © Önder Eren Akgül 2014 All Rights Reserved YEMEN AS AN OTTOMAN FRONTIER AND ATTEMPT TO BUILD A NATIVE ARMY: ASAKİR-İ HAMİDİYE Önder Eren Akgül History, MA, 2014 Supervisor: Selçuk Akşin Somel Keywords: Colonialism, Imperialism, Native army, Ottoman frontiers, Ottoman imperialism ABSTRACT This thesis is a study of the Ottoman attempts to control its frontiers and the frontier populations by basing upon the experience of the native army (Asakir-i Hamidiye) organized by Ismail Hakkı Pasha, who was a governor of Yemen province, between 1800 and 1882. This thesis positions Yemen into the context of the literature produced for the frontier regions; and tries to investigate the dynamics of the institutions and practices pursued in Yemen that differentiated from the financial, military and judicial institutions of the Tanzimat-era. This thesis puts forth that the Ottoman Empire was not a passive audience of imperial competitions of the nineteenth century, but engaged into the imperial struggles by undertaking aggressive measures with an imperialist mind and strategy. Herein, with the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869, the Ottoman ruling elites detected the Red Sea as a strategic region too.
    [Show full text]
  • Televizyon Gazeteciliği
    TELEVİZYON GAZETECİLİĞİ ORTAK DERS PROF. DR. ŞEBNEM ÇAĞLAR İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ AÇIK VE UZAKTAN EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ AÇIK VE UZAKTAN EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ ORTAK DERS Prof. Dr. Şebnem ÇAĞLAR İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ AÇIK VE UZAKTAN EĞİTİM FAKÜLTES Yazar Notu Elinizdeki bu eser, İstanbul Üniversitesi Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Fakültesi’nde okutulmak için hazırlanmış bir ders notu niteliğindedir. ÖNSÖZ I İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ ....................................................................................................................... I İÇİNDEKİLER .......................................................................................................... II KISALTMALAR .......................................................................................................V YAZAR NOTU ........................................................................................................ VI 1. HABER NEDİR? ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Haber ve Dolayımlama (Medyaya Uygun Hale Getirme) .................................... 10 2. UYDULAR VE YAYINCILIK ............................................................................ 14 2.1. Uydularımız ...................................................................................................... 20 2.1.1. Türksat 1A ............................................................................................... 20 2.1.2. Türksat 2A ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE MODERNIZATION of the OTTOMAN NAVY DURING the REIGN of SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ (1861-1876) By
    THE MODERNIZATION OF THE OTTOMAN NAVY DURING THE REIGN OF SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ (1861-1876) by DİLARA DAL A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Department of Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham April, 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The main focus of this study is to examine the modernization of the Ottoman navy during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz, exploring naval administration, education, and technology. Giving a summary of the transformation of shipbuilding technologies and bureaucratic institutions of the Ottoman naval forces between 1808 and 1861, it analyses the structure of the Ottoman navy, its level of development in comparison to previous periods of time, and the condition of the vessels making up the naval fleet from 1861 to 1876. It also intends to evaluate the character of existing administrative structures at the outset of Abdülaziz’s reign in 1861 and the nature of subsequent changes, including structural reorganization of the Imperial Naval Arsenal, the Ministry of Marine, and the Naval Academy, as well as advancements in military training and seafaring; all within the context of the impact of these changes on the military, political, and economic condition of the Empire during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Sovereignty in the Late Ottoman World: Imperial Subjects, Consular Networks and Documentation of Individual Identities
    Building Sovereignty in the Late Ottoman World: Imperial Subjects, Consular Networks and Documentation of Individual Identities Merve Ispahani Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Merve Ispahani All rights reserved ABSTRACT Building Sovereignty in the Late Ottoman World: Imperial Subjects, Consular Networks and Documentation of Individual Identities Merve Ispahani This dissertation examines the formation of Ottoman sovereignty in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries at the disciplinary intersection of international law and history. As an attempt to break away from a strictly territorial understanding of sovereignty as a fixed legal construct, it explores shifting definitions of sovereignty within and across the boundaries of the Ottoman Empire as well as its semi-autonomous provinces. It argues that Ottoman sovereignty was constantly re-defined by inter-imperial rivalries, jurisdictional politics and the formation of modern subjecthood and citizenship in the emerging arena of international law during the period in question. Exploring what it meant to be an Ottoman and a foreigner in the Ottoman Empire during this period, I argue that subjecthood; nationality and citizenship often appear as instrumental categories incidentally utilized by ordinary individuals when deemed necessary. A careful examination of the Ottoman passport regime, on the other hand, proves that there already existed a prolonged process of experimentation on individual documentation and movement controls during the second half of the nineteenth history. Studying a collection of identity cards and passports, I argue that individual documentation was more important for some subjects than others, who needed to maintain and negotiate their identities under overlapping structures of multiple sovereignties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottoman Age of Exploration
    the ottoman age of exploration the Ottomanof explorationAge Giancarlo Casale 1 2010 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dares Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Th ailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2010 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Casale, Giancarlo. Th e Ottoman age of exploration / Giancarlo Casale. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-537782-8 1. Turkey—History—16th century. 2. Indian Ocean Region—Discovery and exploration—Turkish. 3. Turkey—Commerce—History—16th century. 4. Navigation—Turkey—History—16th century. I. Title. DR507.C37 2010 910.9182'409031—dc22 2009019822 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper for my several
    [Show full text]