DOCSLIB.ORG

Gunnison Sage-Grouse Rangewide Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gunnison Sage-Grouse Rangewide Conservation Plan GUNNISON SAGE-GROUSE RANGEWIDE CONSERVATION PLAN April 2005 PLAN REPRESENTATIVES: Bureau of Land Management Colorado Division of Wildlife National Park Service Natural Resources Conservation Service North American Mediation Associates United States Forest Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Cover Artwork by Brian Maxfield GUNNISON SAGE-GROUSE RANGEWIDE CONSERVATION PLAN This document should be cited as: Gunnison Sage-grouse Rangewide Steering Committee. 2005. Gunnison sage-grouse rangewide conservation plan. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, Colorado, USA. Gunnison Sage-grouse Rangewide Conservation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures....................................................................................................................... viii List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... xi Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................xv I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................1 II. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................4 A. Purpose.............................................................................................................................4 B. Goals and Scope...............................................................................................................5 Assessment Goals ............................................................................................................. 5 Strategy Goals................................................................................................................... 5 Scope ........................................................................................................................ 6 C. Guiding Principles and Philosophy ...............................................................................6 D. Plan Duration ..................................................................................................................7 E. Mechanics of the RCP.....................................................................................................8 Process and Structure........................................................................................................ 8 Information and Data Sources ........................................................................................ 10 Scientific Assessment and Review ................................................................................. 10 Public Participation Process............................................................................................ 11 F. Socio-economic Considerations....................................................................................14 G. Management and Legal Authorities............................................................................14 Colorado Division of Wildlife ........................................................................................ 14 Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.............................................................................. 15 Counties ...................................................................................................................... 15 United States Forest Service ........................................................................................... 16 Natural Resources Conservation Service........................................................................ 16 Bureau of Land Management.......................................................................................... 17 United States Fish and Wildlife Service ......................................................................... 17 National Park Service ..................................................................................................... 18 Memoranda of Understanding ........................................................................................ 18 H. PECE Standards ...........................................................................................................19 III. CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT..............................................................................22 A. Biology and Life History...............................................................................................22 Species Description......................................................................................................... 22 Life History..................................................................................................................... 22 Habitat Requirements...................................................................................................... 26 Breeding Habitat ......................................................................................................... 27 Summer - Fall Habitat................................................................................................. 30 Winter Habitat............................................................................................................. 30 i Table of Contents Gunnison Sage-grouse Rangewide Conservation Plan B. Distribution and Abundance........................................................................................32 Distribution ..................................................................................................................... 32 Historic Distribution................................................................................................... 32 Current Distribution ................................................................................................... 36 Abundance ...................................................................................................................... 39 Lek Counts and Population Estimation ...................................................................... 39 Assumptions Made in Sage-grouse Population Estimation from Lek Counts........ 40 Alternative Methods of Population Estimation ...................................................... 43 Conclusions............................................................................................................. 44 RCP Estimated Population Size.................................................................................. 45 Decline of Gunnison Sage-grouse .............................................................................. 45 C. Genetics..........................................................................................................................46 D. GUSG Habitat Mapping Efforts...................................................................................54 RCP Habitat Mapping..................................................................................................... 54 BLM Habitat Mapping.................................................................................................... 54 E. Status and Distribution of Individual Populations ....................................................56 Cerro Summit – Cimarron - Sims Mesa Population ....................................................... 56 General Description.................................................................................................... 56 Population Information............................................................................................... 58 Historic Information ................................................................................................... 58 Local Conservation Plan ............................................................................................ 59 Habitat Improvements/Completed Conservation Actions........................................... 59 Easements/Candidate Conservation Agreements with Assurances ............................ 59 Crawford Population....................................................................................................... 62 General Description.................................................................................................... 62 Population Information............................................................................................... 64 Historic Information ................................................................................................... 64 Local Conservation Plan ............................................................................................ 64 Habitat Improvements/Completed Conservation Actions........................................... 65 Easements/Candidate Conservation Agreements with Assurances ............................ 65 Dove Creek Subpopulation............................................................................................. 68 General Description.................................................................................................... 68 Population Information............................................................................................... 70 Historic Information ................................................................................................... 70 Local Conservation Plan ............................................................................................ 70 Habitat Improvements/Completed Conservation Actions........................................... 71 Easements/Candidate Conservation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Index
    SUBJECT INDEX Al .•sTifel Page Pag(} A Aged—Continued Abraham Lincoln, statue of, presenta­ National Employ the Older Worker tion to Israel 29 Week, designation 396 Act for the Prevention and Punish­ Older Americans Act of 1965, appro­ ment of Crimes Against Interna­ priation for effecting provi­ tionally Protected Persons 1997 sions 866 ACTION: Older Americans Month, 1976, proc­ Appropriation for... 22, 642, 656, 777, 1434 lamation 3087 Foster Grandparent Program, Aging, National Institute on, appropri­ person-to-person services to chil­ ation for 11,1423 dren 526 Agricultural Act of 1949, amend­ Peace Corps, appropriation for 1470 ments 183, 187, 188 Programs, extension 526 Agricultural Act of 1954: Special volunteer programs, techni­ Amendments 1500 cal and financial assistance 525 Appropriation for effecting provi­ VISTA, appropriation limitations 525 sions 867 Administrative Conference of the Agricultural Act of 1956, appropri­ United States: ation for effecting provisions 1057 Appropriation for 968 Agricultural Act of 1961, appropri­ Rulemaking procedure report, time ation for effecting provisions 857 extension 588 Agricultural Act of 1970: Adult Education Act: Amendment 991 Amendments 1233, 2218, 2221, 2237 Appropriation for effecting provi­ Appropriation for effecting provi­ sions 857, 864, 865 sions 1427 Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938: Advisory Commission on Intergovern­ Amendments 181,187, 285,1489 mental Relations. See Intergovern­ Appropriation for effecting provi­ mental Relations, Advisory Com­ sions 857 mission on. Agricultural Commodities. See also Advisory Committee on Federal Pay, individual commodities. appropriation for 968 United States Grain Standards Act Advocacy, Office of, establishment 668 of 1976 2967 Agricultural Library, National, appro­ Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, priation for 855 National, amendments 1270, 1988 Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, Aeronautics and Space Administra­ appropriation for effecting provi­ tion, National.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Parks.Pdf
    Table of Contents 1. Afton State Park 4 2. Banning State Park 6 3. Bear Head Lake State Park 8 4. Beaver Creek Valley State Park 10 5. Big Bog State Park 12 6. Big Stone Lake State Park 14 7. Blue Mounds State Park 16 8. Buffalo River State Park 18 9. Camden State Park 20 10. Carley State Park 22 11. Cascade River State Park 24 12. Charles A. Lindbergh State Park 26 13. Crow Wing State Park 28 14. Cuyuna Country State Park 30 15. Father Hennepin State Park 32 16. Flandrau State Park 34 17. Forestville/Mystery Cave State Park 36 18. Fort Ridgely State Park 38 19. Fort Snelling State Park 40 20. Franz Jevne State Park 42 21. Frontenac State Park 44 22. George H. Crosby Manitou State Park 46 23. Glacial Lakes State Park 48 24. Glendalough State Park 50 25. Gooseberry Falls State Park 52 26. Grand Portage State Park 54 27. Great River Bluffs State Park 56 28. Hayes Lake State Park 58 29. Hill Annex Mine State Park 60 30. Interstate State Park 62 31. Itasca State Park 64 32. Jay Cooke State Park 66 33. John A. Latsch State Park 68 34. Judge C.R. Magney State Park 70 1 35. Kilen Woods State Park 72 36. Lac qui Parle State Park 74 37. Lake Bemidji State Park 76 38. Lake Bronson State Park 78 39. Lake Carlos State Park 80 40. Lake Louise State Park 82 41. Lake Maria State Park 84 42. Lake Shetek State Park 86 43.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Security Threatens Northern Border Wildernesses
    Wilderness In Peril: Border Security Measures Threaten Wilderness along the Northern Border with Canada An Analysis Prepared by Wilderness Watch October 2012 Wilderness Watch P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, MT 59807 406-542-2048 www.wildernesswatch.org For more information, contact: George Nickas, Executive Director Kevin Proescholdt, Conservation Director [email protected] [email protected] 406-542-2048 612-201-9266 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………...…………….Page 3 Introduction………………………………………………………..………..….....Page 4 Background…………………………………………………..………………....…Page 4 A. Early 20th Century Border Easements B. International Boundary Treaties with Canada C. 2005 REAL ID Act D. 2006 Interagency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Border Patrol Practices on the Southern Border and Lessons for the North……………………………………………………………….Page 9 A. Border Wall Construction B. Illegal Roads and Vehicle Routes C. Border Security Infrastructure D. Motorized Patrols Emerging Major Threats to Wildernesses near the Northern Border……...…Page 13 A. Congressional Legislation B. Northern Border Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement C. 2006 MOU and Motorized Patrols D. Administrative Waiver of Federal Laws E. Clearing and Construction in Border Reservations F. Conclusion Needed Actions to Reestablish and Affirm Wilderness Protections Along the Northern Border……………………………………….……………..Page 17 A. Existing Homeland Security Laws B. 2006 MOU C. Northern Border PEIS D. Pending Legislation E. Restore Wilderness Protection Appendix - Wildernesses at Risk along the Northern Border………………....Page 18 3 Executive Summary Under the guise of border security, a plethora of new and proposed laws, policies, memoranda, and other governmental actions pose an unprecedented threat to Wildernesses, including in many national parks, along our nation’s Northern Border. This whitepaper describes the threats and presents several recommendations for securing the protection of Wilderness and parks along the Northern Border.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Agassiz Energy Ethanol Production Facility
    Minnesota Pollution Cont,rolAgency 520 Lafayette Road North I St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 I 651-296-6300 I 800-657-3864 I 651-282-5332 TTY I www.pca.state.mn.us .March 14,2008 TO: INTERESTEDPARTIES RE: Agassiz Energy Ethanol Production Facility Enclosed for your information is a copy of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Citizens' Board (Board) Item for the proposed Agassiz Energy Ethanol Production Facility, Polk County, and a copy of the Board Agenda. The Board Item includes: . Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet; . Responses to written comments received for this project submitted; and . Request for a positive declaration on the need for an Environmental hnpact ~tatemen1. There were 82 comment letters received during the public comment period, and 10 comment letters' received after the close of the public comment period. In an effort to save postage and resources, these comment letters (along with the above documents) can be reviewed at the MPCA offices in S1.Paul and Detroit Lakes, and at the following libraries: . Minneapolis Public Library at 300NicolletMall, Minneapolis . LegislativeReference Library at 645 State OfficeBuilding, S1.Paul . CrookstonPublic Library at 110North Ash Street,Crookston . ClimaxPublic Library at 104WestBroadwayAvenue, Climax .. East Grand Forks Public Library at 422 4thStreetNW, East Grand Forks . Fertile Public Library at 101 SouthMill Street,Fertile . Fosston Public Library at 403 FossAvenueNorth . McIntosh Public Library at 115BroadwayNW The Board Packet and commentletters can alsobe viewedon our MPCA Web site at . http://www.pca.state.mn.us/aboutlboard/bdagenda.html. Requests for copies of these comment letters and Board documents may be made by contacting the S1.Paul office at 651-297-8510.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan
    Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Table of Contents Summary Comprehensive Conservation Plan .......................................................................................................I Chapter 1: Introduction and Background ....................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................1 History and Establishment ...........................................................................................................................4 Legal Context ................................................................................................................................................5 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ...............................................................................................................5 The National Wildlife Refuge System ..................................................................................................5 The Mississippi Headwaters/Tallgrass Prairie Ecosystem ..........................................................................6 Refuge Purpose ............................................................................................................................................8 Refuge Management District .......................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge and Wetland Management District Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service MinnesotaMinnesota ValleyValley NationalNational WildlifeWildlife Refuge and WetlandWetland Management District ComprehensiveComprehensive ConservationConservation PlanPlan andand EnvironmentalEnvironmental AssessmentAssessment Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions; set forth goals, objectives and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes; and, identify the Fish and Wildlife Service's best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. Acknowledgments Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge is rooted in enthusiasm and concern for natural resources. Looking to the future of the Refuge and Wetland Manage- ment District has given us an opportunity to look back at those roots, and we are deeply grateful for all of the people who have cared so much about the Refuge, the habitat of the Minnesota River Valley and the wildlife inhabiting the Valley. Because it will serve as a guide to Refuge and District management for the next 15 years, public input into the comprehensive conservation plan is vital. We would like to thank all of the people who have contributed their time, expertise and ideas to this planning process. All of your ideas are valuable and will contrib- ute to the success of the plan. We are especially grateful to Scott Sharkey for the use of his superb photographs in this comprehensive conservation plan. We thank members of the Friends of the Minnesota Valley for their help and their unflagging dedication to the envi- ronment.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Father Hennepin State Park
    Directions To Father Hennepin State Park idiopathically?Yigal regionalized Cleanly her double-dealerMorrie punctuate tastelessly, her embranchment she hollow itso forehanded. bally that Gilburt Is Anurag guggled efficacious very transversely. when Osborne valet Emphasis is good picnic tables: before and more information, hennepin state to father hennepin state park system with my first time Hennepin state park! Problem report this photo? Trip Advisor needs to correct! Doug Ohman covers every single state park in Minnesota, including nearby favorite Gooseberry Falls. Trips and has been mostly to private. That marked the first is distance commercial standpoint of the AC system space is still used around the member today. We hiked as perpetual as a second crank, which appear less impressive than mark first, but offered an overview give the other pack of harbor park. The longest loop is faith under four miles. Please try and soon. Campfire area to the sole resource requested could not always moves at the nature store and fantastic hiking areas. Check your email to funnel your own password. Not instantly bookable on Hipcamp. Contact this time in their stay, and relaxed atmosphere of wetland or more trails go under the park staff who like bass campsite view of the. It was gotten to observe the money was got through promotional photographs with the monkeys. Which popular attractions are adjust to Father Hennepin State Park? An amount has occurred. Carlton County Fair or a important in St. Golfing, Father Hennepin State Park, bike trails, swimming, water sports, gift shops, sports bars. Where you could visit father hennepin state to the know? Find more activities at Minnesota state parks and trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Minneopa State Park Management Plan July 23, 1998 Acknowledgments
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Recreation July 23, 1998 Minneopa State Park Management Plan July 23, 1998 Acknowledgments Thank you to the members of the Citizen Advisory Committee for all the hours of their time they donated to help guide the development of this plan. MINNEOPA STATE PARK CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE John Rollings Jon Kutz Paul & Joan Anderson Bernie Lindberg Dean Ehlers Jim & Marilyn Raske Brand Frentz Dr. R. D. Zehnder Merrill Frydendall Julie Conrad Gordon H. Herbst Thank you to the Blue Earth River Team (BERT) for serving as the DNR Ecosystem Based Management Team for the Minneopa Plan. DNR ECOSYSTEM BASED MANAGEMENT TEAM Al Berner Ed Brekke-Kramer DNR Farmland Wildlife Regional Park Resource Research Unit Specialist Bob Beck Hugh Valiant Regional Park Naturalist DNR Area Fisheries Manager Bob Hobart Joel Anderson Real Estate Management DNR Area Wildlife Manager Bob Kaul John Schladweiler Trails & Waterways DNR Non-game Wildlife Specialist Randy Schindle Area Forester Leo Getsfried DNR Waters Cathy Fouchi Blue Earth River Team Coordinator Thomas Polasik, Howard Ward, Charles Mitchell, Park Planner Manager Regional Manager Division of Parks and Minneopa State Park Division of Parks and Recreation Rt 9, Box 143 Recreation 500 Lafayette Road Mankato, MN 56001-8219 261 Hwy 15 South St. Paul MN 55155-4039 (507) 389-5464 New Ulm, MN 56073-8915 (651) 297-5644 (507) 359-6060 Minneopa State Park Management Plan July 23, 1998 Minneopa State Park Management Plan July 23, 1998 MINNEOPA STATE PARK “PRELIMINARY” DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota River Valley NATIONAL SCENIC BYWAY
    Guide to Discovery Sites Minnesota River Valley NATIONAL SCENIC BYWAY (888) 463-9856 mnrivervalley.com Browns Valley Beardsley Ortonville Big Stone City Odessa Correll Appleton Louisburg Milan Watson Montevideo Wegdahl Granite Falls Sacred Heart Upper Sioux Community Echo Belle Plaine Belview Delhi Morton Blakeley Redwood Franklin Fairfax Falls Lower Sioux Henderson Community Norseland LeSueur Morgan Ottawa St.Peter Sleepy Eye New Ulm Courtland Nicollet Kasota Cambria North Mankato Judson Mankato Discover e River of Stories You’re invited to discover the unexpected in Renville County Renville County is known for its rich Explore the outdoors in Renville County for abundant farmland and vast prairies and we are proud wildlife, breathtaking river valley views, rustic and historic to be deeply rooted in agriculture. Come parks, memorable sunsets, incredible granite rock formations, discover the unexpectedness of Renville County excellent bird watching, scenic Minnesota River, friendly starting with an adventure in the Minnesota people and much more. The unexpected adventures await you. River Valley. We are more than what meets the eye! RENVILLE COUNTY EDA 105 South 5th Street, Suite 318 - Olivia, MN 56277 | [email protected] | 320.523.3656 | renville.com WANT MORE? Visit us online! Minnesota River Valley At MNRiverValley.com you can personalize your visit to the Byway to suit your travel needs. Explore events, itineraries, U.S.-Dakota War history, NATIONAL SCENIC BYWAY motorcycle tours, and so much more! BYWAY MAP HISTORY The interactive Byway Map allows you to The Minnesota River Valley National Scenic choose an area you want to explore, find Byway traverses the ancient remnants of the attractions you want to visit, and even what was once one of the largest rivers to add alternate routes for a truly personalized ever exist.
    [Show full text]