DOCSLIB.ORG

Minneopa State Park Management Plan July 23, 1998 Acknowledgments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minneopa State Park Management Plan July 23, 1998 Acknowledgments Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Recreation July 23, 1998 Minneopa State Park Management Plan July 23, 1998 Acknowledgments Thank you to the members of the Citizen Advisory Committee for all the hours of their time they donated to help guide the development of this plan. MINNEOPA STATE PARK CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE John Rollings Jon Kutz Paul & Joan Anderson Bernie Lindberg Dean Ehlers Jim & Marilyn Raske Brand Frentz Dr. R. D. Zehnder Merrill Frydendall Julie Conrad Gordon H. Herbst Thank you to the Blue Earth River Team (BERT) for serving as the DNR Ecosystem Based Management Team for the Minneopa Plan. DNR ECOSYSTEM BASED MANAGEMENT TEAM Al Berner Ed Brekke-Kramer DNR Farmland Wildlife Regional Park Resource Research Unit Specialist Bob Beck Hugh Valiant Regional Park Naturalist DNR Area Fisheries Manager Bob Hobart Joel Anderson Real Estate Management DNR Area Wildlife Manager Bob Kaul John Schladweiler Trails & Waterways DNR Non-game Wildlife Specialist Randy Schindle Area Forester Leo Getsfried DNR Waters Cathy Fouchi Blue Earth River Team Coordinator Thomas Polasik, Howard Ward, Charles Mitchell, Park Planner Manager Regional Manager Division of Parks and Minneopa State Park Division of Parks and Recreation Rt 9, Box 143 Recreation 500 Lafayette Road Mankato, MN 56001-8219 261 Hwy 15 South St. Paul MN 55155-4039 (507) 389-5464 New Ulm, MN 56073-8915 (651) 297-5644 (507) 359-6060 Minneopa State Park Management Plan July 23, 1998 Minneopa State Park Management Plan July 23, 1998 MINNEOPA STATE PARK “PRELIMINARY” DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 Park Description.........................................................1 Unit Planning Process ....................................................3 II. MISSION AND VISION ..........................................4 Department of Natural Resources Vision .....................................4 Division of Parks and Recreation Mission and Vision ...........................4 Division of Parks And Recreation Mission ..............................4 Division of Parks And Recreation Vision ...............................4 Minneopa State Park Mission and Vision.....................................5 Minneopa State Park Mission ........................................5 Minneopa State Park Vision .........................................5 Summary of Recommended Management Actions .........................6 III. REGIONAL ANALYSIS ........................................12 Regional Population Analysis .............................................12 Regional Recreation Resources............................................12 Regionaltourism Impact..................................................13 Park Visitor Analysis....................................................14 Regional Recreation Patterns..............................................15 IV. INVENTORY OF EXISTING RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, AND NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ....................................................17 Recreation Resources....................................................17 Existing Development .............................................17 Natural Resources ......................................................24 Minnesota River Prairie ...........................................24 Climate .........................................................25 Geology and Minerals .............................................25 Soils ...........................................................27 Water Resources .................................................30 Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species ...................30 Vegetation ......................................................32 Minneopa State Park Management Plan i July 23, 1998 Fish, and Wildlife .................................................37 Mammals.................................................38 Fish......................................................44 Birds.....................................................41 Reptiles and Amphibians .....................................41 Cultural Resources......................................................42 Park History .....................................................42 Archaeology .....................................................42 Historic Features .................................................43 V. ECOSYSTEM BASED MANAGEMENT, AND NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT .........46 Ecosystem Based Management ............................................46 Natural and Cultural Resources Management.................................46 Natural Resources Management Objectives ..................................46 Cultural Resources Management Objectives..................................49 VI. RECREATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT .............51 Recreation Management Objectives ........................................51 Proposed Development ..................................................52 Overnight Facilities ...............................................52 Day Use Facilities ................................................53 VII. INTERPRETIVE SERVICES .................................. 60 Introduction ...........................................................60 Interpretive Clientele....................................................61 Interpretive Themes.....................................................61 Summary of Existing Interpretive Services...................................63 Interpretive Services Recommendations.....................................64 VIII. FACILITY AND BUILDING MANAGEMENT ..............65 Administrative Facilities Management Objectives .............................65 IX. PARK BOUNDARY .............................................68 Boundary Modification ..................................................68 Existing Statutory Boundary ..............................................68 Minneopa State Park Management Plan ii July 23, 1998 Proposed Statutory Boundary .............................................68 X. OPERATIONS, STAFFING, AND COSTS ....................71 Operations and Staffing..................................................71 Costs.................................................................72 XI. PARTNERSHIPS WITH THE COMMUNITY ...............74 Tourism ..............................................................75 Volunteers ............................................................76 Partnerships...........................................................77 XII. PLAN MODIFICATION PROCESS ...........................78 XIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY ...............................................80 List of Maps...........................................................82 List of Tables..........................................................82 © State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources, 1998 Minneopa State Park Management Plan iii July 23, 1998 Minneopa State Park Management Plan iv July 23, 1998 I. INTRODUCTION PARK DESCRIPTION Minneopa State Park includes 1,216 acres of old glacial river terraces, riparian forests south of the Minnesota River, and Minneopa Creek gorge. Within Minneopa State Park is southern Minnesota’s largest waterfall and the remains of the Seppmann Windmill, a historic structure of regional significance. Minneopa State Park is located off State Highways 169, and 68, three miles west of Mankato in Blue Earth County. One of the main attractions to Minneopa State Park is the double waterfall of Minneopa Creek, for which the park is named, and the gorge the creek has created. The word Minneopa means “water falling twice” or “two waterfalls” in the Dakota Indian language. The first falls drops about ten feet and the second at least 40 feet. Other attractions to the park include the beautiful views of the Minnesota Valley. The history of the Minneopa State Park is rich and varied. On the Blue Earth River, near where it enters the Minnesota River is the famous bed of clay which the Dakota Indians called “mankato,” or blue earth. This clay was highly valued and was used for decoration and for ceremonial purposes. It also attracted early European explorers. This bluish-gray clay was mistakenly identified as copper. Under the commission of the French government, Pierre LeSueur visited the area with 30 soldiers and miners during the fall of 1700. The expedition traveled by boat up the Minnesota and Blue Earth rivers to the mouth of the LeSueur River and built Fort L’Huillier. A quantity of the clay was sent to France where it was discovered that it did not contain copper. The Dakota forced the LeSueur party to cache their tools and abandon the area in 1703. Minneopa Creek was known to the early pioneers as Falls Creek or Lyons Creek. The latter is a reference to Isaac S. Lyons, the first settler to build a cabin and locate a claim on its banks in July, 1853. In August of the following year, he built a small sawmill operated by water power which was the first mill west of the Blue Earth River. His log cabin stood at the foot of the west bluff. A wind-powered grist mill was constructed by Louis Seppmann and Herman Hagley between 1862 and 1864, on a site which lies within the park. The mill operated as a flour mill for its first 16 years. In 1873, lightning struck and destroyed two of its windmill blades; they were soon replaced. However, when a tornado again destroyed the blades in 1880, they were not replaced. The mill operated on two blades, as a feed mill, until 1890. Seppmann Mill was placed on the National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: an Inventory of Its State Park Maps
    MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Minnesota State Archives HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT An Inventory of Its State Park Maps OVERVIEW OF THE RECORDS Agency: Minnesota. Dept. of Highways. Series Title: State park maps, Dates: 1922. Abstract: Blueprint maps showing boundaries and facilities in state parks. Quantity: 22 items in oversize folder. Location: A3/ov4 Drawer 2 SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF THE RECORDS Blueprint maps showing boundaries and facilities in various state parks, with proposed expansions of the park's land area or the addition of facilities. Most show plot plans and give elevation information. The maps were drawn by the Highway Department on orders of Governor J. A. O. Preus for use in legislative deliberations regarding park budgets, according to information printed on the maps. RELATED MATERIALS Related materials: Later state park maps, created by the state Conservation Department, are found with that department's records. INDEX TERMS This collection is indexed under the following headings in the catalog of the Minnesota Historical Society. Researchers desiring materials about related topics, persons or places should search the catalog using these headings. Topics: Mapping. Parks--Minnesota--Maps. Parks--Minnesota--Finance. Types of Documents: Hghwy005.inv HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. State Park Maps, 1922. p. 2 Maps--Minnesota. Site plans--Minnesota. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Preferred Citation: [Indicate the cited item here]. Minnesota. Dept. of Highways. State park maps, 1922. Minnesota Historical Society. State Archives. See the Chicago Manual of Style for additional examples. Accession Information: Accession number(s): 991-52 Processing Information: PALS ID No.: 0900036077 RLIN ID No.: MNHV94-A228 ITEM LIST Note to Researchers: To request materials, please note the location and drawer number shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L: Oak Savanna Definition
    Appendix L: Oak Savanna Definition Appendix L: Oak Savanna Definition Working Definition of “Savanna” for shaded environments under trees, shifting as the tree canopy becomes more open or closed. Herba- Restoration Efforts at Crane Meadows ceous species typical of prairie and forest co-occur; NWR in addition to a set of very specific savanna species (see lists below) that have high fidelity to this com- General Definition of Southern Dry Savanna: munity type (Texler Personal commun., Drobney Personal commun. (Buchanan 1996). This spatial Savanna habitat at Crane Meadows NWR, like variation within the understory is a function of the savanna across its range, is a fire-dependent, varying degrees of species tolerance to shade and dynamic community characterized by scattered sun. Forbs are an essential component of the under trees or groves of trees, mostly comprised of oaks - story. Another important component of savanna (Quercus sp.) with a canopy cover ranging from 10– 70%, but more typically between 25-50%; and a understory is the shrub layer. The understory of basal area (BA) of 5-50 sq ft / acre. A wide range is savanna on the Anoka Sandplain, including those at Crane Meadows NWR, can be present with or with- used because canopy cover is not the most impor- tant characteristic that defines savanna and also out shrubs. The extent of shrub density is depen- because savanna ecosystems are dynamic and are dent on the subtype savanna classification and the frequency of fire (Law et al. 1994, Swanson 2008, associated with a natural range of variation through space and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Statutes 2020, Chapter 85
    1​ MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020​ 85.011​ CHAPTER 85​ DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION​ STATE PARKS, RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES​ 85.06​ SCHOOLHOUSES IN CERTAIN STATE PARKS.​ 85.011​ CONFIRMATION OF CREATION AND​ 85.20​ VIOLATIONS OF RULES; LITTERING; PENALTIES.​ ESTABLISHMENT OF STATE PARKS, STATE​ 85.205​ RECEPTACLES FOR RECYCLING.​ RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.21​ STATE OPERATION OF PARK, MONUMENT,​ 85.0115​ NOTICE OF ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS.​ RECREATION AREA AND WAYSIDE FACILITIES;​ 85.012​ STATE PARKS.​ LICENSE NOT REQUIRED.​ 85.013​ STATE RECREATION AREAS AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.22​ STATE PARKS WORKING CAPITAL ACCOUNT.​ 85.014​ PRIOR LAWS NOT ALTERED; REVISOR'S DUTIES.​ 85.23​ COOPERATIVE LEASES OF AGRICULTURAL​ 85.0145​ ACQUIRING LAND FOR FACILITIES.​ LANDS.​ 85.0146​ CUYUNA COUNTRY STATE RECREATION AREA;​ 85.32​ STATE WATER TRAILS.​ CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL.​ 85.33​ ST. CROIX WILD RIVER AREA; LIMITATIONS ON​ STATE TRAILS​ POWER BOATING.​ 85.015​ STATE TRAILS.​ 85.34​ FORT SNELLING LEASE.​ 85.0155​ LAKE SUPERIOR WATER TRAIL.​ TRAIL PASSES​ 85.0156​ MISSISSIPPI WHITEWATER TRAIL.​ 85.40​ DEFINITIONS.​ 85.016​ BICYCLE TRAIL PROGRAM.​ 85.41​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI PASSES.​ 85.017​ TRAIL REGISTRY.​ 85.42​ USER FEE; VALIDITY.​ 85.018​ TRAIL USE; VEHICLES REGULATED, RESTRICTED.​ 85.43​ DISPOSITION OF RECEIPTS; PURPOSE.​ ADMINISTRATION​ 85.44​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI TRAIL GRANT-IN-AID​ 85.019​ LOCAL RECREATION GRANTS.​ PROGRAM.​ 85.021​ ACQUIRING LAND; MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL.​ 85.45​ PENALTIES.​ 85.04​ ENFORCEMENT DIVISION EMPLOYEES.​ 85.46​ HORSE
    [Show full text]
  • Black Oak Savanna Nature Centres 5 Summer Camp Sign-Up 6 by Kevin Tupman Oak Savanna
    THE GRAND STRATEGY NEWSLETTER Volume 15, Number 3 - May-June 2010 Grand River The Grand: Conservation A Canadian Authority Heritage River Feature Fire restores a rare savanna forest 1 Milestones Byng island’s 50th 2 Look Who’s Taking Action Caring for bluebirds 3 Swallow habitat 4 Rotary forest 5 Fire restores a rare forest: What’s happening New programs at black oak savanna nature centres 5 Summer camp sign-up 6 By Kevin Tupman oak savanna. Older oaks now existing within the SWP update 6 Natural Heritage Specialist area are a testament to the vision, progressive for Grand River a grand its time, expressed in the master plan. place to paddle 7 ost people know that some plants and ani- Fire is necessary because this rare ecosystem Water festival photo 7 Mmals are at risk, such as the bald eagle and is sustained by fire. Historically, fire resulted American ginseng, but not many people realize from either lightning or aboriginal inhabitants. Now Available that communities such as forests, can also be at Fire ensures that savanna areas do not turn into Grand new risk. dense forests. Only trees with a high tolerance fishing book 7 It is true that sugar maple woodlots and pine for fire, such as the black oak, are able to sur- plantations are commonplace. However, the vive. European settlers cleared much of the savanna Calendar 8 GRCA is restoring one of the rarest of forests — for agriculture. They also suppressed the fires. a black oak savanna close to Apps’ Mill in Brant This meant that surviving pockets of savanna Cover photo County.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Grau Memorial Oak Savanna Trail Guide
    Robert Grau Robert Grau was a forester and a true conservationist. He was a charter member of Robert Grau the Clayton County Conservation Board from 1958-1978, and he was one of the first to Memorial Oak reconstruct a prairie in Clayton County in the late 1970's . The reconstruction of Savanna Trail this Oak Savanna is dedicated to his memory. Guide 29862 Osborne Road Elkader, IA 52043 Clayton County (563)-245-1516 Robert Grau with his son and grandsons Conservation Board Welcome! Prairie Reconstruction Oak Savanna Welcome to the Robert Grau Memorial Oak As you make your way up the first hill, you’ll notice a At the top of the hill, you have a good view of the oak Savanna and Trail! Use this brochure to help large open prairie off to the right. Prairie was once savanna. Savannas are open landscapes of widely guide you along the trail. We hope you enjoy common in NE Iowa. The original spaced, broad-crowned trees and a diverse mix of your visit! prairie around the village of Motor shrubs, grasses, and wildflowers. Once common in was turned into farmland when the NE Iowa’s hills and river valleys, savannas are now Limestone Kiln Klink family bought Motor Mill and rare, due to land use change for farming and building. At the beginning of the trail next to the road, just past surrounding buildings in 1903. the Cooperage, is where a lime kiln was once located. Clayton County Conservation Limestone Quarry acquired the site in 1983 and has The kiln would have been used during the late 1860’s Once at the top of the hill, you will notice a large since restored this area to prairie when Motor Mill was being constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Abstract Oak Openings
    Oak Openings CommunityOak Openings,Abstract Page 1 Historical Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Photo by Michael A. Kost Absent or likely absent Overview: Oak openings is a fire-dependent, savanna climatic tension zone. In the 1800s, oak openings were type dominated by oaks, having between 10 and located in the south-central Lower Peninsula of Michigan 60% canopy, with or without a shrub layer. The on sandy glacial outwash and coarse-textured moraines predominantly graminoid ground layer is composed (Wing 1937, Comer et al. 1995, NatureServe 2004). Oak of species associated with both prairie and forest openings occurred within the range of bur oak plains communities. Oak openings are found on dry-mesic and oak barrens, with oak openings dominating more on loams and occur typically on level to rolling topography dry-mesic to mesic soils, bur oak plains occupying more of outwash and coarse-textured end moraines. Oak mesic, flat sites in the southwestern part of the Lower openings have been nearly extirpated from Michigan; Peninsula, and oak barrens thriving on droughty sites. only two small examples have been documented. These similar oak savanna types often graded into each other. Oak openings were historically documented in Global and State Rank: G1/S1 the following counties: Allegan, Barry, Berrien, Branch, Calhoun, Cass, Clinton, Eaton, Genesee, Hillsdale, Range: Oak savanna1 and prairie communities reached Ingham, Ionia, Jackson, Kalamazoo, Kent, Lapeer, their maximum coverage in Michigan approximately Lenawee, Livingston, Macomb, Montcalm, Monroe, 4,000-6,000 years ago, when post-glacial climatic Newaygo, Oakland, Ottawa, Shiawassee, St. Joseph, Van conditions were comparatively warm and dry.
    [Show full text]
  • Minneopa State Park Is That Ground Wheat and Other Grains from 1864 to STATE PARK a FULL SET of STATE PARK RULES and the Third Oldest State Park in Minnesota
    © 2020, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ABOUT THE PARK SO EVERYONE CAN MINNEOPA ENJOY THE PARK... Established in 1905, Minneopa State Park is that ground wheat and other grains from 1864 to STATE PARK A FULL SET OF STATE PARK RULES AND the third oldest state park in Minnesota. It is best 1890. REGULATIONS IS AVAILABLE ONLINE. known for the double waterfall that 54497 GADWALL RD. PARK OPEN MANKATO, MN 56001 thunders during high water. The upper falls 8 a.m.–10 p.m. daily. BLUE EARTH COUNTY • 507-386-3910 [email protected] drops 7 to 10 feet and the lower falls tumbles another 40. This feature is the result of water CAMPGROUND QUIET HOURS cutting into layers of sandstone over time. 10 p.m.–8 a.m. Take the Mill Road to look for the bison, VISITOR TIPS VEHICLE PERMITS reintroduced in 2015. These animals will Required; purchase at park office or self-pay station. • Respect trail closures. naturally manage the prairie ecosystem, • Minneopa has two sections. just as they did over a hundred fifty years ago. PETS WELCOME The office and waterfall are off Near this area, you may view another Keep on 6-foot leash; leave no trace; only service animals allowed in park buildings. County Highway 69. Camping, reminder of the park’s rich history: Seppmann Don’t miss the double waterfall stone windmill, and bison are Mill. Enjoy a walk to the sandstone windmill FIREWOOD off Highway 68. Use only from approved vendors. • Minneopa Creek is not TRAIL HIGHLIGHTS recommended for swimming.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Index
    SUBJECT INDEX Al .•sTifel Page Pag(} A Aged—Continued Abraham Lincoln, statue of, presenta­ National Employ the Older Worker tion to Israel 29 Week, designation 396 Act for the Prevention and Punish­ Older Americans Act of 1965, appro­ ment of Crimes Against Interna­ priation for effecting provi­ tionally Protected Persons 1997 sions 866 ACTION: Older Americans Month, 1976, proc­ Appropriation for... 22, 642, 656, 777, 1434 lamation 3087 Foster Grandparent Program, Aging, National Institute on, appropri­ person-to-person services to chil­ ation for 11,1423 dren 526 Agricultural Act of 1949, amend­ Peace Corps, appropriation for 1470 ments 183, 187, 188 Programs, extension 526 Agricultural Act of 1954: Special volunteer programs, techni­ Amendments 1500 cal and financial assistance 525 Appropriation for effecting provi­ VISTA, appropriation limitations 525 sions 867 Administrative Conference of the Agricultural Act of 1956, appropri­ United States: ation for effecting provisions 1057 Appropriation for 968 Agricultural Act of 1961, appropri­ Rulemaking procedure report, time ation for effecting provisions 857 extension 588 Agricultural Act of 1970: Adult Education Act: Amendment 991 Amendments 1233, 2218, 2221, 2237 Appropriation for effecting provi­ Appropriation for effecting provi­ sions 857, 864, 865 sions 1427 Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938: Advisory Commission on Intergovern­ Amendments 181,187, 285,1489 mental Relations. See Intergovern­ Appropriation for effecting provi­ mental Relations, Advisory Com­ sions 857 mission on. Agricultural Commodities. See also Advisory Committee on Federal Pay, individual commodities. appropriation for 968 United States Grain Standards Act Advocacy, Office of, establishment 668 of 1976 2967 Agricultural Library, National, appro­ Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, priation for 855 National, amendments 1270, 1988 Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, Aeronautics and Space Administra­ appropriation for effecting provi­ tion, National.
    [Show full text]
  • The Campground Host Volunteer Program
    CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM THE CAMPGROUND HOST VOLUNTEER PROGRAM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1 CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION Introduction This packet is designed to give you the information necessary to apply for a campground host position. Applications will be accepted all year but must be received at least 30 days in advance of the time you wish to serve as a host. Please send completed applications to the park manager for the park or forest campground in which you are interested. Addresses are listed at the back of this brochure. General questions and inquiries may be directed to: Campground Host Coordinator DNR-Parks and Recreation 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4039 651-259-5607 [email protected] Principal Duties and Responsibilities During the period from May to October, the volunteer serves as a "live in" host at a state park or state forest campground for at least a four-week period. The primary responsibility is to assist campers by answering questions and explaining campground rules in a cheerful and helpful manner. Campground Host volunteers should be familiar with state park and forest campground rules and should become familiar with local points of interest and the location where local services can be obtained. Volunteers perform light maintenance work around the campground such as litter pickup, sweeping, stocking supplies in toilet buildings and making emergency minor repairs when possible. Campground Host volunteers may be requested to assist in the naturalist program by posting and distributing schedules, publicizing programs or helping with programs. Volunteers will set an example by being model campers, practicing good housekeeping at all times in and around the host site, and by observing all rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Parks.Pdf
    Table of Contents 1. Afton State Park 4 2. Banning State Park 6 3. Bear Head Lake State Park 8 4. Beaver Creek Valley State Park 10 5. Big Bog State Park 12 6. Big Stone Lake State Park 14 7. Blue Mounds State Park 16 8. Buffalo River State Park 18 9. Camden State Park 20 10. Carley State Park 22 11. Cascade River State Park 24 12. Charles A. Lindbergh State Park 26 13. Crow Wing State Park 28 14. Cuyuna Country State Park 30 15. Father Hennepin State Park 32 16. Flandrau State Park 34 17. Forestville/Mystery Cave State Park 36 18. Fort Ridgely State Park 38 19. Fort Snelling State Park 40 20. Franz Jevne State Park 42 21. Frontenac State Park 44 22. George H. Crosby Manitou State Park 46 23. Glacial Lakes State Park 48 24. Glendalough State Park 50 25. Gooseberry Falls State Park 52 26. Grand Portage State Park 54 27. Great River Bluffs State Park 56 28. Hayes Lake State Park 58 29. Hill Annex Mine State Park 60 30. Interstate State Park 62 31. Itasca State Park 64 32. Jay Cooke State Park 66 33. John A. Latsch State Park 68 34. Judge C.R. Magney State Park 70 1 35. Kilen Woods State Park 72 36. Lac qui Parle State Park 74 37. Lake Bemidji State Park 76 38. Lake Bronson State Park 78 39. Lake Carlos State Park 80 40. Lake Louise State Park 82 41. Lake Maria State Park 84 42. Lake Shetek State Park 86 43.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Security Threatens Northern Border Wildernesses
    Wilderness In Peril: Border Security Measures Threaten Wilderness along the Northern Border with Canada An Analysis Prepared by Wilderness Watch October 2012 Wilderness Watch P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, MT 59807 406-542-2048 www.wildernesswatch.org For more information, contact: George Nickas, Executive Director Kevin Proescholdt, Conservation Director [email protected] [email protected] 406-542-2048 612-201-9266 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………...…………….Page 3 Introduction………………………………………………………..………..….....Page 4 Background…………………………………………………..………………....…Page 4 A. Early 20th Century Border Easements B. International Boundary Treaties with Canada C. 2005 REAL ID Act D. 2006 Interagency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Border Patrol Practices on the Southern Border and Lessons for the North……………………………………………………………….Page 9 A. Border Wall Construction B. Illegal Roads and Vehicle Routes C. Border Security Infrastructure D. Motorized Patrols Emerging Major Threats to Wildernesses near the Northern Border……...…Page 13 A. Congressional Legislation B. Northern Border Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement C. 2006 MOU and Motorized Patrols D. Administrative Waiver of Federal Laws E. Clearing and Construction in Border Reservations F. Conclusion Needed Actions to Reestablish and Affirm Wilderness Protections Along the Northern Border……………………………………….……………..Page 17 A. Existing Homeland Security Laws B. 2006 MOU C. Northern Border PEIS D. Pending Legislation E. Restore Wilderness Protection Appendix - Wildernesses at Risk along the Northern Border………………....Page 18 3 Executive Summary Under the guise of border security, a plethora of new and proposed laws, policies, memoranda, and other governmental actions pose an unprecedented threat to Wildernesses, including in many national parks, along our nation’s Northern Border. This whitepaper describes the threats and presents several recommendations for securing the protection of Wilderness and parks along the Northern Border.
    [Show full text]