DOCSLIB.ORG

Certified By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Certified By Extra-terrestrial Nuclear Power Stations: Transportation and Operation i MASSACHUSETTSIN--E- i by i OF TECHNOLOGY I Susan Christine Kane MAR 2 8 2006 B.S. Engineering Physics and Nuclear Engineering LIBRARIES Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2004 ! ._ Submitted to the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering ARCHIVES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Nuclear Science and Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology August 2005&2ef 005 ©C2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved A/ Cen Signature of Author Department of Nuclear Science and'Engineering 20,2005 \\ \ \\ ANK~~\\IN~~ \\\\\' K~~ \~ \ x August Certifiedby:.. by.... -- -- -, N - - -.. 2A.5 Jeffre A.Hoffman J Professor of --the Practice-- of--- Aeronautics----- -- and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Certified...........by: , ................-Ad.---...............', ------ Andrew C. Kadak Professor of the Practice of Nuclear Science and Engineering Thesis Reader J A -'^ Acceptedby:..............................-. -c- '1".~~ ~Jeffery A. Coderre Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Studies (This page left intentionally blank) Extra-terrestrial Nuclear Power Stations: Transportation and Operation by Susan Christine Kane Submitted to the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering on August 19, 2005 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Nuclear Science and Engineering ABSTRACT Many challenges exist when considering nuclear power to provide electricity for bases on the Moon or Mars, including launch safety, landing safety, deployment, control, and protecting the astronauts from radiation. Examples from the past provide guidance in these areas but surface operations on another body have never been attempted and rarely studied. This thesis discusses the risks and design considerations for launching, transporting, landing. and operating a nuclear fission reactor on the Moon or Mars. A reference mission and reactor were chosen to facilitate analysis in these areas. Launching a reactor involves meeting environmental and federal regulations. This includes an extensive safety analysis of launch to determine if launch accidents pose a serious risk to the public due to fuel release or inadvertent criticality. The reactor must also be able to survive the launch conditions without damage. Transport mainly involves protecting the reactor from damage from meteoroids. The reactor will then land through propulsive means on the Moon or Mars. Landing a reactor will also require a safety analysis to determine the consequences of a landing accident on the Moon or Mars. On the surface, the reactor must be at a location far enough away from the astronauts to limit radiation exposure to the astronauts from the reactor. Interaction from ground control and astronauts will be necessary to initiate startup, shutdown, and to change the power level of the reactor; however, startup and operation of the reactor must be autonomous due to the communications time lag between Earth and the Moon or Mars. These are significant challenges but all are feasible given the technology and experience in nuclear engineering and astronautics that exits today. Thesis Supervisor: Jeffrey Hoffman Title: Professor of the Practice, Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Reader: Andrew Kadak Title: Professor of the Practice. Nuclear Science and Engineering 3 (This page left intentionally blank) Table of Contents I. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................9 1.1 The Case for Nuclear Power ...................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Past Uses of N uclear Power in Space ........................................................................................ 15 2. Reference M ission and Design ........................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Reference M ission ..................................................................................................................... 20 2.2 M IT M ars Surface Reactor ........................................................................................................ 22 3. Nuclear Launch Requirem ents ............................................................................................................ 25 3.1 Environm ental Regulations .............................................. 5.........................................................5 3.1.1 Review of Cassini EIS .......................................................................................................... 26 3.2 Nuclear Launch Safety Approval Procedure ............................................................................. 42 3.2.1 Review of Cassini Final Safety Analysis Report .................................................................. 46 3.2.2 Review of Cassini Final Safety Evaluation Report ............................................................... 62 3.3 Comparison of RTGs to Nuclear Reactors ................................................................................ 65 3.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 68 3.5 Suggested Changed to Reference Design .................................................................................. 69 4. Transportation ..................................................................................................................................... 70 4.1 Transport Between Earth and the Moon or Mars ...................................................................... 70 4.1.1 Design Considerations .......................................................................................................... 71 4.1.2 Suggested Changes to Reference Design .............................................................................. 71 5. Landing on Moon or Mars .................................................................................................................. 72 5.1.1 M ethod .................................................................................................................................. 72 5.1.2 Issues ..................................................................................................................................... 73 5.1.3 Suggested Changes to Reference Design .............................................................................. 76 6. Surface Operations .............................................................................................................................. 78 6.1 Deploym ent ............................................................................................................................... 78 6.2 Impact on Base Design .............................................................................................................. 80 6.3 Startup ........................................................................................................................................ 82 6.3.1 Exam ples of Reactor Startup Procedures .............................................................................. 83 6.3.2 H eat Pipe Startup ................................................................................................................... 86 6.3.3 Proposed Startup Procedure for Reference Design ............................................................... 91 6.4 Control ....................................................................................................................................... 98 6.5 Radiation Protection ................................................................................................................ 100 6.6 Suggested Changes to Reference Design ................................................................................ 107 7. Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... 108 8. References......................................................................................................................................... 111 Appendix A: Power M odels ...................................................................................................................... 116 Appendix B: Pilgrim Preoperational and Startup Procedures...................................................................129 5 List of Figures Figure 1-1: Comparison of Power System Mass on Martian Equator on Clear Day .................................. 12 Figure 1-2: Power System Mass Comparison on Martian Equator during Martian Dust Storm ................ 13 Figure 1-3: Successfully Launched Space Nuclear Power Systems Launched by U.S.A. as of 1996 ........ 16 Figure 1-4: Diagram of the SNAP- I OA............................................................................ 1..........................7 Figure 2-1: Diagram of Architecture 969, the Reference Mission .............................................................. 22 Figure 2-2: Top-down View of the Martian Surface Reactor ..................................................................... 23 Figure 2-3: Cut-away View of the Martian Surface Reactor ...................................................................... 24 Figure 3-1: Diagram of the GPHS-RTG Assembly ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team
    NASA Special Publication 6107 Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team Stephen J. Hoffman, Editor David I. Kaplan, Editor Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas July 1997 NASA Special Publication 6107 Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team Stephen J. Hoffman, Editor Science Applications International Corporation Houston, Texas David I. Kaplan, Editor Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas July 1997 This publication is available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, 800 Elkridge Landing Road, Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934 (301) 621-0390. Foreword Mars has long beckoned to humankind interest in this fellow traveler of the solar from its travels high in the night sky. The system, adding impetus for exploration. ancients assumed this rust-red wanderer was Over the past several years studies the god of war and christened it with the have been conducted on various approaches name we still use today. to exploring Earth’s sister planet Mars. Much Early explorers armed with newly has been learned, and each study brings us invented telescopes discovered that this closer to realizing the goal of sending humans planet exhibited seasonal changes in color, to conduct science on the Red Planet and was subjected to dust storms that encircled explore its mysteries. The approach described the globe, and may have even had channels in this publication represents a culmination of that crisscrossed its surface. these efforts but should not be considered the final solution. It is our intent that this Recent explorers, using robotic document serve as a reference from which we surrogates to extend their reach, have can continuously compare and contrast other discovered that Mars is even more complex new innovative approaches to achieve our and fascinating—a planet peppered with long-term goal.
    [Show full text]
  • NETS 2020 Template
    بÀƵƧǘȁǞƧƊǶ §ȲȌǐȲƊǿ ƊƧDzɈȌɈǘƵwȌȌȁƊȁƮȌȁ ɈȌwƊȲȺɈǘȲȌɐǐǘƊƮɨƊȁƧǞȁǐ خȁɐƧǶƵƊȲɈƵƧǘȁȌǶȌǐǞƵȺƊȁƮ ǞȁȁȌɨƊɈǞȌȁ ǞȺ ȺȯȌȁȺȌȲƵƮ Ʀɯ ɈǘƵ ƊDz ªǞƮǐƵ yƊɈǞȌȁƊǶ ׁׂ׀ׂ y0À² ÀǘǞȺ ƧȌȁǏƵȲƵȁƧƵ خׁׂ׀ׂ ةɈǘ׀׃ƊȁƮ ɩǞǶǶƦƵ ǘƵǶƮ ǏȲȌǿȯȲǞǶ ׂ׆ɈǘٌةmƊƦȌȲƊɈȌȲɯ ɩǞǶǶ ƦƵ ǘƵǶƮ ɨǞȲɈɐƊǶǶɯ ȺȌ ɈǘƊɈ ɈǘƵ ƵȁɈǞȲƵ y0À² خƧȌǿǿɐȁǞɈɯǿƊɯȯƊȲɈǞƧǞȯƊɈƵǞȁɈǘǞȺƵɮƧǞɈǞȁǐǿƵƵɈǞȁǐ ǐȌɨخȌȲȁǶخخׁׂ׀ȁƵɈȺׂششبǘɈɈȯȺ Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space Sponsored by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, April 26th-30th, 2021. Available online at https://nets2021.ornl.gov Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Thanks to the NETS2021 Sponsors! ...................................................................................................................... 2 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Schedule at a Glance ................................................. 3 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Technical Sessions and Panels By Track ............... 6 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Lightning Talk Final Program ................................... 8 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Track 1 Final Program ............................................. 11 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Track 2 Final Program ............................................. 14 Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2021 – Track 3 Final Program ............................................. 18
    [Show full text]
  • Lightweight, High-Temperature Radiator for In-Space Nuclear- Electric Power and Propulsion
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Summer November 2014 Lightweight, High-Temperature Radiator for In-Space Nuclear- Electric Power and Propulsion Briana N. Tomboulian University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Heat Transfer, Combustion Commons, Propulsion and Power Commons, and the Systems Engineering and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Commons Recommended Citation Tomboulian, Briana N., "Lightweight, High-Temperature Radiator for In-Space Nuclear-Electric Power and Propulsion" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 247. https://doi.org/10.7275/5972048.0 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/247 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lightweight, High-Temperature Radiator for In-Space Nuclear-Electric Power and Propulsion A Dissertation Presented by BRIANA N. TOMBOULIAN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2014 Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department © Copyright by Briana N. Tomboulian 2014 All Rights Reserved Lightweight, High-Temperature Radiator
    [Show full text]
  • High Performance Mars Ascent Vehicles, Earth Return Vehicles and “All-Up” Launch Strategy for Low Cost Sample Return
    Concepts and Approaches for Mars Exploration (2012) 4356.pdf HIGH PERFORMANCE MARS ASCENT VEHICLES, EARTH RETURN VEHICLES AND “ALL-UP” LAUNCH STRATEGY FOR LOW COST SAMPLE RETURN. L. G. Lemke1, C. R. Stoker1, B. J. Glass1, J. S. Karcz1, J. V. Bowles1, A. A. Gonzales1, S. Davis2 . 1NASA Ames Research Center, 2SpaceX Company. Introduction: Robotic missions to return carefully straints force a complex architecture to be fractionated selected samples of Mars atmosphere, regolith, and into smaller pieces and implemented over a longer rock have been actively studied and advocated by time than might otherwise be desireable. One conse- NASA for at least the last 15 years and remain a very quence of this mission fractionation is that the DSA high priority objective of both the Science Mission uses a small (≈ 300 kg) Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) Directorate (SMD) and the Human Exploration and with a ΔV of ≈ 4 km/s—just enough to attain low Mars Operations Mission Directorate (HEOMD) programs. orbit. This, in turn requires MOR to place the sample As a practical matter, such missions are intrinsically container in a hermetically sealed Earth Return Vehicle among the most complex robotic planetary missions (ERV) before departure toward Earth. The Mars Or- that can be engineered. The current Decadal Survey biter in the DSA is itself a large and highly capable Architecture (DSA) incorporates virtually every tech- spacecraft requiring a dedicated launch and mission nical capability in the robotic spaceflight repertoire— control. atmospheric Entry Descent and Landing (EDL) at A Johnson Space Center (JSC) study con- Mars, Mars surface mobility, subsurface sample acqui- ducted by the then Office of Exploration [1] examined sition, autonomous sample handling for planetary pro- the cost and risk benefits of MSR alternatives not re- tection, Mars surface rendezvous with rovers, launch quiring MOR.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Mars Mission Architecture Plan to Settle the Red Planet with 1000 People
    Human Mars Mission Architecture Plan to Settle the Red Planet with 1000 People Malaya Kumar Biswal M1, Vishnu S2, Devika S Kumar3, Sairam M4 Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Puducherry, India - 605 014 Abstract Exploration is one of the attentive endeavor to mankind and a strategy for evolution. We have been incessantly reconnoitering our planet and universe from Mesopotamian era to modern era. The progression of rocketry and planetary science in past century engendered a futuristic window to explore Mars which have been a source of inspiration to hundreds of astronomers and scientists. Globally, it invigorated space exploration agencies to make expedition for planetary exploration to Mars and Human Mars Missions. Scientists and engineers have portrayed numerous Human Mars Mission proposals and plans but currently the design reference mission 5.0 of NASA is the only mission under study. Here we propose a mission architecture for permanent Human Mars Settlement with 1000 peoples with multiple launch of sufficient cargoes and scientific instruments. Introduction: This paper focuses on design of Human Mars Mission with reference to the instructions by Mars Society. We proposed mission architecture for carrying 1000 peoples onboard spaceship (Marship). Overall mission architecture outline map and Human Mars Settlement Map is provided next to this page. We divided the whole mission architecture into three phases starting from orbital launch of launch vehicles and Mars colony establishment. We proposed novel habitat for protection during robust dust storms, various method to make the colony economically successful, minerals and their applications, administrative methods, water extraction, plantation, landing patterns, estimation of masses of food to be carried out and customizable system for re-use and recycling.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Assessment of Space Solar Power As a Source of Electricity for Space-Based Activities
    An Economic Assessment of Space Solar Power as a Source of Electricity for Space-Based Activities Molly K. Macauley and James F. Davis October 2001 • Discussion Paper 01–46 Resources for the Future 1616 P Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: 202–328–5000 Fax: 202–939–3460 Internet: http://www.rff.org © 2001 Resources for the Future. All rights reserved. No portion of this paper may be reproduced without permission of the authors. Discussion papers are research materials circulated by their authors for purposes of information and discussion. They have not necessarily undergone formal peer review or editorial treatment. An Economic Assessment of Space Solar Power as a Source of Electricity for Space-Based Activities Molly K. Macauley and James F. Davis Abstract We develop a conceptual model of the economic value of space solar power (SSP) as a source of power to in-space activities, such as spacecraft and space stations. We offer several estimates of the value based on interviews and published data, discuss technological innovations that may compete with or be complementary to SSP, and consider alternative institutional arrangements for government and the private sector to provide SSP. Key Words: innovation, government policy JEL Classification Numbers: O33, O32, L98 ii Contents I. Introduction and Overview ................................................................................................ 1 I. a. What Is SSP? ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Earth Return Vehicle (MERV) Propulsion Options
    Mars Earth Return Vehicle (MERV) Propulsion Options Steven R. Oleson,1 Melissa L. McGuire,2 Laura Burke,3 James Fincannon,4 Joe Warner,5 Glenn Williams,6 and Thomas Parkey7 NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Tony Colozza,8 Jim Fittje,9 Mike Martini,10 and Tom Packard11 Analex Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Joseph Hemminger12 N&R Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 John Gyekenyesi13 ASRC Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 The COMPASS Team was tasked with the design of a Mars Sample Return Vehicle. The current Mars sample return mission is a joint National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and European Space Agency (ESA) mission, with ESA contributing the launch vehicle for the Mars Sample Return Vehicle. The COMPASS Team ran a series of design trades for this Mars sample return vehicle. Four design options were investigated: Chemical Return /solar electric propulsion (SEP) stage outbound, all-SEP, all chemical and chemical with aerobraking. The all-SEP and Chemical with aerobraking were deemed the best choices for comparison. SEP can eliminate both the Earth flyby and the aerobraking maneuver (both considered high risk by the Mars Sample Return Project) required by the chemical propulsion option but also require long low thrust spiral times. However this is offset somewhat by the chemical/aerobrake missions use of an Earth flyby and aerobraking which also take many months. Cost and risk analyses are used to further differentiate the all-SEP and Chemical/Aerobrake options. 1COMPASS Lead, DSB0, 21000 Brookpark Road, and AIAA Senior Member. 2COMPASS Integration Lead, DSB0, 21000 Brookpark Road, non-member. 3Mission Designer, DSB0, 21000 Brookpark Road, and Non-Member.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Reactors for Space Power, Understanding the Atom Series
    4:=:* irni a I_ = 11111 1 1. 0 .A1-11 C=3. 1=3.- i=a DOCUMENT RESUME ED 054 966 SE 012 470 AUTHOR Corliss, William R. TITLE Nuclear Reactors for Space Power, Understanding the Atom Series. INSTITUTION Atomic Energy Commission, Oak Ridge, Tenn. Div. of Technical Information. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 52p.; Revised AVAILABLE FROM USAEC, P. O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 (Free) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Technology; College Science; Instructional Materials; *Nuclear Physics; Physics; Resource Materials; Secondary School Science IDENTIFIERS Atomic Energy Commission ABSTRACT The historical development of rocketry and nuclear technology includes a specific description of Systems forNuclear Auxiliary Power (SNAP) programs. Solar cells and fuelcells are considered as alternative power supplies for space use.Construction and operation of space power plants must includeconsiderations of the transfer of heat energy to electricity andof waste heat dissipation. The shielding of such plants is important,from both efficiency and safety standpoints. The safety of nuclearmaterial handling in space flight is especially crucial. Variousimprovements are proposed concerning present powerplantsLists of relevant reading topics and of motion pictures are included. (TS) LI S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION &WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- DUCED EY,ACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG- INATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN- -511, IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY , REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU- CATION POSITION OR POLICY '4)4f i_NuclearI Reactors for Space Power by William R. Corliss Understanding the Atom Series Booklet ,The Understanding the Atom Series Nuclear energy is playing a vital role in the life of every man, woman, and child in theUnited States today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Nuclear Power in Space Exploration
    Nuclear Power in Space Exploration and the Associated Environmental Safeguards: An Overview by Michael D. Campbell, P.G., P.H. Chair, Uranium Committee Energy Minerals Division, AAPG and Member of the Astrogeology Committee, AAPG and Managing Partner M. D. Campbell and Associates, L.P. Houston and Seattle January, 2009 HGS Dinner Mtg of the Environmental and Engineering Section Investigation Participants A Report of the Uranium Committee of the Energy Minerals Division, AAPG by Michael D. Campbell, P.G., P.H., (Chair) Houston Jeffery D. King, P.G. (Associate) Seattle Henry M. Wise, P.G. (Member) Houston Bruce N. Handley, P.G. (Member) Houston M. David Campbell, P.G. (Associate) Houston Report Outline Introduction …………………………………….. Satellites ………………………………………… Lunar-Solar or Lunar-Nuclear Power ………… Spacecraft Propulsion ………………………….. Planet-Based Power Systems ……... Earth-Based Power Systems ……… Environmental Safeguards in Orbit …………….. Other Environmental Considerations in Space ... International Development The Nuclear Genie is Out of the Bottle …………. Research and Development: ……………………. Small Earth-Based NPSs ………………… Direct-Conversion Systems …………… Problems to be Solved ………………………….. Off-World Mining: ……………………………… The Debate on a Lunar or Mars Base … Mining Asteroids ……………………… The Space Elevator …………………………….. Near-Earth Asteroids and Comets ….................... Earth-Based Spin Off from Space Research …. Conclusions ……………………………………... Acknowledgements ……………………………… References (with links) …………………………… Outline for this Presentation • Spacecraft
    [Show full text]
  • Astroenvironmentalism: the Case for Space Exploration As an Environmental Issue
    UCLA Electronic Green Journal Title Astroenvironmentalism: The Case for Space Exploration As An Environmental Issue Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2d37b8cx Journal Electronic Green Journal, 1(15) Author Miller, Ryder W. Publication Date 2001-12-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Astroenvironmentalism: The Case for Space Exploration As An Environmental Issue Ryder W. Miller San Francisco, USA ..................................... Astroenvironmentalism is a concept that applies the values of environmentalism and preservationism to developments in space exploration, commercialization, and militarization. It can be both an umbrella term to describe a variety of issues about space exploration as well as a component of the ongoing public debate about the environment. The most important struggle is to prevent space from becoming a new battleground-we need to keep nuclear energy out of space. This article discusses the responsibility of keeping space free of environmental hazards and debris. A case is made for astroenvironmentalism to be included in the public consciousness on the environment and the establishment of ethical guidelines to avoid environmental disasters in space. Astroenvironmentalism, an argument to apply the values of environmentalism and preservationism to developments in space exploration, militarization and commercialism, is not a new idea. But recent developments in space exploration suggest this perspective is not widely acknowledged enough by those who envision taking steps to enter space. Environmentalists did not take a stand on these issues over the last few years, which was unfortunate because this was a topical time to argue that space should be an environmental issue. Astroenvironmentalism is an addition to present efforts, but also an umbrella term to describe a variety of related concerns held by many players in the environmental arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Reactor Arms Control L OVERVIEW
    "- Science and Global Security, 1989, Volume I, pp.59-82 Photooopying permitted by license only Reprints available directly from the publisher C>1989 Gordon and Breach Science Publishers S.A. Printed in the United States of America Space Reactor Arms Control l OVERVIEW Joel R. Primack, Nancy E. Abrams, Steven Aftergood, David W. Hafemeister, Daniel O. Hirsch, Robert Mozley, Oleg F. Prilutsky, Stanislav N. Rodionov, and Roald Z. SagdeevO Unshielded nuclear reactors provide the lightest and most survivable long-lived sources of electric power available to support military satellites. Restricting their use now, before a new generation of larger space reactors is tested and deployed by the US and USSR, could help prevent an arms race in space. Space nuclear power systems have been used by the United States and the Soviet Union since the 1960s. The Soviet Union has used orbiting nuclear reactors to power more than 30 radar ocean reconnaissance satellites (RORSATs). 'l\vo RORSATs have accidentally re-entered and released their radioactivity into the environment, and a third, Cosmos 1900, narrowly avoided a similar fate. The United States is developing much more powerful space reactors, of which the SP-I00 is farthest along, primarily to power satellite components of the Strat- egic Defense Initiative (SDl). A working group associated with the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) and the Committee of Soviet Scientists for Peace and Against the Nuclear Threat (CSS) has been studying a proposed ban on orbiting reactors. A proposal by the FAS/CSS group that includes such a ban is attached in the appendix to the Overview.
    [Show full text]