The Neolithic and Early Bronze Age: Resource Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Neolithic and Early Bronze Age: Resource Assessment 87 Chapter 7 The Neolithic and Early Bronze Age: Resource Assessment by Richard Bradley (County contributions by Kim Biddulph, Steve Ford, Julie Gardiner, Gill Hey and Ruth Waller; palaeoenvironmental contribution by Mike Allen) Introduction Durrington Walls, just as it is important to think about an early Bronze Age that does not depend on the rich The nature of the evidence burials found on the Dorset and Wiltshire chalk. Not only does the Solent-Thames corridor avoid these It is often claimed that linear projects such as pipelines famous groups of monuments, it covers an area in or major roads provide a novel perspective on the past. which certain kinds of structure seem to be rare or They cannot represent a ‘random sample’ of archaeolog- absent. Causewayed enclosures are unusual outside ical observations because each element does not have the Thames Valley and southern Cotswolds; long the same chance of being selected. Instead, their course barrows of classic form are not represented across the is essentially arbitrary and bears no obvious relationship entire study area; henges are uncommon or take to the geography of any particular period. For that unusual forms, and rich early Bronze Age cemeteries reason the results of monitoring these developments are are the exception rather than the norm. That may not often surprising, and it is those surprises that provide a be an impediment to research, for it can be argued stimulus for rethinking archaeological orthodoxies. that, within the wider context of British prehistory, Regions prove to have been settled where few sites had developments in the heart of earlier prehistoric Wessex been known before; rich burials are found outside the were altogether exceptional. A framework of more small concentrations on which the literature had been general application may depend on fieldwork in other based; new kinds of monument are revealed and familiar regions, in particular the major river valleys and the forms occur in unfamiliar settings. It is not the most North Sea coast. obvious way of conducting research, but sometimes the A few basic points need to be made at the outset. results of this work offer a perspective out of which new Some of these observations apply to the entire prehis- approaches to the past can develop. toric sequence; others are specific to the period between The same should be true of the Regional Research 4000 and 1500 BC that provides the subject of this Assessments, of which this publication is an example. chapter. They are concerned with regions of the country which have been selected on the basis of modern administra- tive arrangements. They lack any real geographical Inherited landscapes and Neolithic and early unity, and the relationships between their component Bronze Age land use parts may well have changed over time. On the other It is no longer satisfactory to suppose that the earlier hand, like the road schemes that have done so much to prehistoric landscape was covered by a continuous widen the scope of prehistoric archaeology, the canopy of trees (Allen and Gardiner 2009). By the process of bringing together what is known about beginning of the Neolithic period some areas had been these areas of land can be remarkably productive. A modified by burning – both deliberate and accidental – distribution of key sites and other selected sites is and others by natural events, especially storms (Brown shown in Figure 7.1. 1997). The vegetation cover will also have been As it happens, the area selected for the Solent- affected by the activities of wild animals, by the ecolog- Thames Research Assessment has many of these ical preferences of different kinds of woodland, and advantages. Like the building of pipelines, it makes during the Neolithic period by such practices as archaeologists think harder about some areas that have coppicing and pollarding. There was greater variation not played a major part in writings about prehistory – than is generally supposed, and recent research in the Isle of Wight, for example, or the Buckinghamshire Cranborne Chase and on the Yorkshire Wolds suggests Chilterns. Quite by chance, it also avoids a region that certain areas of chalk downland may never have whose monuments have been over-emphasised in been covered by primary forest in the way that is accounts of prehistoric Britain. It is an important commonly supposed (French et al. 2007; Allen and challenge to write about the Neolithic period without Scaife 2007). That is especially important because both discussing Hambledon Hill, Stonehenge, Avebury and these regions contain an unusual concentration of 88 Solent-Thames Research Framework for the Historic Environment Figure 7.1 Neolithic and Early Bronze Age sites mentioned in the text Chapter 7 The Neolithic and Early Bronze Age: Resource Assessment 89 Neolithic monuments. By contrast, there is little to Some of the changes to the natural environment that suggest the existence of comparable environments in took place during or after this period have severely the study area (Robinson 1992a and b; Hey et al. 2011 biased the archaeological record. In the valleys of major b; Field 2004; 2008). rivers like that of the Thames, occupation sites and some The pattern of prehistoric activity cannot be of the smaller monuments have been buried beneath reconstructed on the basis of modern land use. There later deposits of alluvium (Robinson 1992b; Evans are areas that provide evidence of continuous occupa- 1992a; Parker and Robinson 2003). Others were tion, for example the Thames gravels (Barclay et al. preserved because they occupied the hollows left by 1996), while there are others that show signs of intensive former channels and escaped destruction by the plough. activity in certain phases and little evidence of occupa- On the chalk there is another source of bias, for not only tion in others. The character of the local soils has has much of the original topsoil been lost by erosion, this changed significantly. The clay-with-flints which caps process had led to the accumulation of deep deposits of the chalk was intensively used in the Mesolithic and hill wash on the valley floors. Recent work in Sussex and Neolithic periods but was less densely settled during Kent has shown that these had buried some of the later phases. Similarly, the heathland soils of the New elusive living sites of the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Forest and perhaps the Hampshire Greensand saw a (Allen and Scaife 2007). Similar evidence has been peak of activity during the Bronze Age, but since then identified on the Chilterns and it is probable that the they seem to have been regarded as marginal land (Field same process happened in other parts of the study area 2008). (Evans 1972; Evans and Valentine 1974). The increase in the number of palaeo-environmental Archaeologists still assign a special status to the datasets has improved the resolution at which we can archaeology of the chalk. That needs careful considera- look at landscapes and land-use, whether for individual tion. It is true that it is an area with an unusual density of sites or across whole regions (Allen 1997a and b; Allen field monuments, but this is only partly due to develop- and Gardiner 2009). We can now start to re-address ments during the prehistoric period. To a large extent the some key questions surrounding the presence and use prominence of chalkland monuments is the result of later of ‘farmed’ produce, and whether this indicates a wholly land use. These structures escaped some of the destruc- farming economy. The Neolithic may partly be defined tive activities that affected their lowland counterparts. by the presence of farming activities, but Neolithic For example, it is often supposed that early Bronze Age communities may have had a risk-averse strategy which burial mounds were sited in prominent positions, yet involved hunting and gathering as well as farming their overall distribution is most obviously related to (Jones 2000; Moffett et al. 1989; Robinson 2000). In important valleys, as it is on the Isle of Wight (Allen and addition, the use of domesticated resources does not Scaife 2007). The earthworks on the hills have escaped require a sedentary lifestyle. The issue as to whether the the damage experienced by barrows on the lower ground, economy of these communities becomes largely, or and yet it is often the case that a distribution of standing wholly, based around a domesticated food supply mounds gives way to one of ring ditches. They are discov- requires further study. ered by different methods and sometimes they are treated While there may be some relationship between the as different kinds of monuments. extent of open ground and the choice of certain regions The survival of so many earthworks on the high for monument building, it is not correct to use the downland introduces yet another bias, for it is often frequency of earthwork structures to estimate the supposed that they were located along ‘ridgeways’: long intensity of occupation in any part of the study area. The distance paths extending between major groups of construction of such monuments certainly required a monuments. The antiquity of these routes is very significant labour force, but its members could have doubtful. Their course is not reflected by later prehis- been drawn from a wider region. Elsewhere in England, toric field systems and land boundaries, suggesting that some monument complexes are associated with such features as the Berkshire Ridgeway or the Icknield evidence of nearby settlement, but there are others Way did not exist until long after the period discussed where it is absent (Bradley 2006). In the same way, it is here (Harrison 2003). Instead it seems as if the main incorrect to suppose that areas that lack large concentra- communications were along the valleys and around the tions of field monuments were less intensively occupied.
Recommended publications
  • Community Led Plan 2019 – 2024
    The Community Plan and Action Plan for Millom Without Parish Community Led Plan 2019 – 2024 1 1. About Our Parish Millom Without Parish Council is situated in the Copeland constituency of South West Cumbria. The Parish footprint is both in the Lake District National Park or within what is regarded as the setting of the Lake District National Park. This picturesque area is predominately pastoral farmland, open fell and marshland. Within its boundary are the villages of The Green, The Hill, Lady Hall and Thwaites. On the North West side, shadowed by Black Combe, is the Whicham Valley and to the South the Duddon Estuary. On its borders are the villages of Silecroft, Kirksanton, Haverigg, Broughton in Furness, Foxfield, Kirkby in Furness, Ireleth, Askam and the town of Millom. On the horizon are the Lake District Fells which include Coniston, Langdale and Scafell Ranges and is the gateway to Ulpha, Duddon and Lickle Valleys. Wordsworth wrote extensively of the Duddon, a river he knew and loved from his early years. The Parish has approximately 900 Residents. The main industry in this and surrounding areas is tourism and its relevant services. Farming is also predominant and in Millom there are a number of small industrial units. The Parish is also home to Ghyll Scaur Quarry. 2. Our Heritage Millom Without is rich in sites of both historic and environmental interest. Historic features include an important and spectacular bronze age stone circle at Swinside, the Duddon Iron furnace, and Duddon Bridge. The landscape of Millom Without includes the Duddon estuary and the views up to the Western and Central Lake District Fells.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Tell a Cromlech from a Quoit ©
    How to tell a cromlech from a quoit © As you might have guessed from the title, this article looks at different types of Neolithic or early Bronze Age megaliths and burial mounds, with particular reference to some well-known examples in the UK. It’s also a quick overview of some of the terms used when describing certain types of megaliths, standing stones and tombs. The definitions below serve to illustrate that there is little general agreement over what we could classify as burial mounds. Burial mounds, cairns, tumuli and barrows can all refer to man- made hills of earth or stone, are located globally and may include all types of standing stones. A barrow is a mound of earth that covers a burial. Sometimes, burials were dug into the original ground surface, but some are found placed in the mound itself. The term, barrow, can be used for British burial mounds of any period. However, round barrows can be dated to either the Early Bronze Age or the Saxon period before the conversion to Christianity, whereas long barrows are usually Neolithic in origin. So, what is a megalith? A megalith is a large stone structure or a group of standing stones - the term, megalith means great stone, from two Greek words, megas (meaning: great) and lithos (meaning: stone). However, the general meaning of megaliths includes any structure composed of large stones, which include tombs and circular standing structures. Such structures have been found in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, North and South America and may have had religious significance. Megaliths tend to be put into two general categories, ie dolmens or menhirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on a New Horizons Research Project. MAGNETOMETER
    Report on a New Horizons Research Project. MAGNETOMETER SURVEYS OF PREHISTORIC STONE CIRCLES IN BRITAIN, 1986. by A. Jensine Andresen and Mark Bonchek of Princeton University. Copyright: A. Jensine Andresen, Mark Bonchek and the New Horizons Research Foundation. November 1986. CONTENTS. Introductory Note. Magnetic Surveying Project Report on Geomantic Resea England, June 16 - July 22, 1986. Selected Notes. Bibliography. 1. Introductory Note. This report deals with a piece of research falling within the group of enquiries comprised under the term "geomancy". which has come into use during the past twenty years or so to connote what could perhaps be called the as yet somewhat speculative study of various presumed subtle or occult properties of terrestrial landscapes and the earth beneath them. In earlier times the word "geomancy" was used rather differently in relation to divination or prophecy carried out by means of some aspect of the earth, but nowadays it refers to the study of what might be loosely called "earth mysteries". These include the ancient Chinese lore and practical art of Fengshui -- the correct placing of buildings with respect to the local conformation of hills and dales, the orientation of medieval churches, the setting of buildings and monuments along straight lines (i.e. the so-called ley lines or leys). These topics all aroused interest in the early decades of the present century. Similarly,since about 1900 interest in megalithic monuments throughout western Europe has steadily increased. This can be traced to a variety of causes, which include increased study and popularisation of anthropology, folklore and primitive religion (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • ROCK ART BIBLIOGRAPHY (Current at July 2008) This Detailed Listing Contains Over a Thousand Publications on Rock Art
    ROCK ART BIBLIOGRAPHY (current at July 2008) This detailed listing contains over a thousand publications on rock art. It relates primarily to rock art in the counties of Durham and Northumberland but also includes many publications on rock art in other parts of Britain and Ireland, as well as on the recording, management, and conservation of carved panels, plus a number of theoretical studies. The bibliography was compiled by Northumberland and Durham Rock Art Pilot Project volunteer, Keith Elliott, with additional contributions from Kate Sharpe and Aron Mazel. Abramson, P. 1996 ‘Excavations along the Caythorpe Gas Pipeline, North Humberside’. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 68, 1-88 Abramson, P. 2002 'A re-examination of a Viking Age burial at Beacon Hill, Aspatria'. Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society 100: 79-88. Adams, M. & P. Carne, 1997 ‘The Ingram and Upper Breamish Valley Landscape Project: interim report 1997’. Archaeological Reports of the Universities of Durham and Newcastle upon Tyne 21, 33- 36 Ainsworth, S. & Barnatt, J., 1998, ‘A scarp-enclosure at Gardom’s Edge, Baslow, Derbyshire’. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal 118, 5-23 Aird, R. A., 1911 ‘Exhibits’. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle upon Tyne 3rd series 5(9), 102 Aitchison, W., 1950 ‘Note on Three Sculptured Rocks in North Northumberland’. History of the Berwickshire Naturalists’ Club 32(1), 50 Alcock, L 1977 ‘The Auld Wives’ Lifts’. Antiquity 51, 117-23 Aldhouse-Green, M., 2004 ‘Crowning Glories. The Language of Hair in Later Prehistoric Europe’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 70, 299-325 Allott, C. & Allot, K., 2006 ‘Rock Art Indoors’.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge and Megalithic Europe
    Alan Mattlage, February 1st. 1997 Stonehenge and Megalithic Europe Since the 17th century, antiquarians and archeologists have puzzled over Stonehenge and similar megalithic monuments. Our understanding of these monuments and their builders has, however, only recently gone beyond very preliminary speculation. With the advent of radiocarbon dating and the application of a variety of sciences, a rough picture of the monument builders is slowly taking shape. The remains of deep sea fish in Mesolithic trash heaps indicate that northern Europeans had developed a sophisticated seafaring society by 4500 BC. The subsequent, simultaneous construction of megalithic monuments in Denmark-Sweden, Brittany, Portugal, and the British Isles indicates the geographic distribution of the society's origins, but eventually, monument construction occurred all across northwestern Europe. The monument builders' way of life grew out of the mesolithic economy. Food was gathered from the forest, hunted, or collected from the sea. By 4000 they began clearing patches of forest to create an alluring environment for wild game as well as for planting crops. This marks the start of the Neolithic period. Their material success produced the first great phase of megalithic construction (c. 4200 to 3200). The earliest monuments were chambered tombs, built by stacking enormous stones in a table-like structures, called "dolmens," which were then covered with earth. We call the resulting tumuli a "round barrow." Local variations of this monument-type can be identified. Elaborate "passage graves" were built in eastern Ireland. Elaborate "passage graves" were built in eastern Ireland. These were large earthen mounds covering a corridor of stones leading to a corbeled chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Be a Cl Allan Gr<
    How to be a Cl Sharon Taylor (Bingley) discovers the dark side of fell-running at Auld Lang Syne Allan Gr< (Photo David Brett) eland S0 n 2003 ^ ° /& > Road Show APPEARING AT THE FOLLOWIN G VENUES FEBRUARY MAY AUGUST 15. CARNETHY (SCOT) 3. STUC A CHROIN (SCOT) B 2. BORROWDALE 23. ILKLEY MOOR 5. WRAY CATON 10. SEDBERGH HILLS MARCH 10. BEN LOMOND (SCOT) 16. BRECON BEACONS 8. DENTDALE (ROAD) 11. BUTTERMERE - SAILBECK (WALES) B 9. BLACK COMBE 17. MOEL EILIO (WALES) B 24. GRASMERE SPORTS 15. CARNFORTH 10K (ROAD) 18. FAIRFIELD SEPTEMBER 16. TRIMPELL 20 (ROAD) 24. HUTTON ROOF 6. BEN NEVIS 22. CONISTON 14 (ROAD) 26. HELVELLYN 7. LANCASTER HALF 31. DUDDON MARATHON (ROAD) 14. MOUNTAIN TRIAL 5. PENDLE JUNE 20. THREE SHIRES 19. ANNIVERSARY WALTZ E 7. PENYGHENT B E 21. DALEHEAD 20. THREE BRIDGES 8. MORECAMBE 10K (ROAD) 10K (ROAD) 10. COLEDALE 27. THIEVELEY PIKE 27. THREE PEAKS 15. GRASMERE GALLOP 18. TEBAY 5. IAN HODGSON RELAY 21. EILDON (SCOT) 11. LANGDALE E 28. DOCKRAY 18. BRITISH RELAYS 29. SETTLE HILLS CHURCH STRETTON 24/25/26. KARRIMOR M M 4/5 SAUNDERS M.M. B = BRITISH CHAMPIONSHIP 6. SKIDDAW B E 2. DERWENTWATER 10 (ROAD) E = ENGLISH CHAMPIONSHIP 12. WASDALE 19. INGLEBOROUGH 8. DUNNERDALE 20. KENTMERE 15. TOUR OF PENDLE 27. WAGON & HORSES 10 (ROAD) 14. CALDERDALE WAY RELAY 31. RYDAL ROUND RING THE NUMBER BELOW TO HAVE YOUR GOODS D ELIV EREb^ Q TO ANY OF THE ABOVE EVENTS PETE BLAND SPORTS/WALSH SPORTS ARE PROUD TO ANNOUNCE THEY ARE SPONSORS OF THE BRITISH FELL & HILL RUNNING CHAMPIONSHIPS FOR 2003/2004 No 1 Stockist, Walsh Fellrunning Shoes, 10% discount to FRA members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rollright Stones; the Stonehenge of Oxfordshire; with Some Account Of
    RoMp With soras account of the Anciesat Dwidi, and Sagas rendered into English fflortif U HmwprattH Eibrarg 01? B ^ Pic THE CELTIC LIBRARY PRESENTED BY CLARK SUTHERLAND NORTHUP CLASS OF 1893 ©I,,m,m. J^-^^MM'%fC and Scenes in this Neighbourhood are Photographed OQd Published by J<enrY W. Jaunt &. Co., OXFOI^D. ^^^^r. All Genuine Pictures ^ju} bear our Trade Mark. OCR** JA^lQ 196013 3 MMf i2 7?-AP 2 JAN * •^OOl 3 1, 96, A S'""'*^ Z^' . l^c. AMES, 34 Mi 21s. A G. POCE THE R j3^^ N 2 8 GFORD, Xllustra^ 'hillings. THERJ >UNTRY, Ind lood. EADING, Shillings. Do\ ingdon, ^^^-^-iS^d-n xpence. With a Guide to the Ncighlioiu-noou. Niiiepence. Gorirjg, Streatley aod the Neighbourl^ood, With Maps and Illustrations. 8vo. cloth, T-v\-o f hillings. pirt0&(tUn ^omev on ^Xax} xncvnxn^, ThifJ Edition, Illustrated, Sixpence. Words and Music only, 2d. Tne Stonehengre of Oxfordshire, (The RoUright Stones,) With Plan and Illustrations. GODSTOW, BINSEY, WYTHAM &c., and the Story of Fair Rosamund, With Map and Illustrations. Paper. Sixpence. Cloth, One Shilling. New Illustrated Books. One Shilling each. Blenheim and Woodstock. Witney and round it. Chipping- Campden. Beaulieu Abbey. Charlbury ar corneii university Library -the -Water. DA 143.098T22 Rollrlaht stones q 4094^027 948 466 with the OXY-HYDRCGEN LANTERN AND CINEMATOGRAPH, Suitable for all Classes, Over 1200 LECTURES AND ENTERTAINMENTS U'|Ml,i\'J. il %il,!iStlj£l_4 HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY GIVEN BY Mr HENRY W. TAUNT, FRG.S., 3cc. Mr. TAUNT'S Lecture on the THAMES ran at the London Polytechnic over 200 Nights.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Sites, Contested Rites/Rights: Contemporary Pagan Engagements with the Past BLAIN, J
    Sacred sites, contested rites/rights: contemporary pagan engagements with the past BLAIN, J. and WALLIS, R. J. Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/58/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version BLAIN, J. and WALLIS, R. J. (2004). Sacred sites, contested rites/rights: contemporary pagan engagements with the past. Journal of material culture, 9 (3), 237-261. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Sacred Sites, Contested Rites/Rights: Contemporary Pagan Engagements with the Past Dr Jenny Blain Dr Robert J Wallis Keywords: Sacred Sites, Paganism, Heritage, New Indigenes, Contested spaces Published 2004 Journal of Material Culture as Blain, J. and R.J. Wallis 2004 Sacred Sites, Contested Rites/Rights: Contemporary Pagan Engagements with the Past. Journal of Material Culture 9.3: 237-261. Abstract Our Sacred Sites, Contested Rites/Rights project ( www.sacredsites.org.uk ) examines physical, spiritual and interpretative engagements of today’s Pagans with sacred sites, theorises ‘sacredness’, and explores the implications of pagan engagements with sites for heritage management and archaeology more generally, in terms of ‘preservation ethic’ vis a vis active engagement. In this paper, we explore ways in which ‘sacred sites’ --- both the term and the sites --- are negotiated by different
    [Show full text]
  • The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles
    www.RodnoVery.ru www.RodnoVery.ru The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles www.RodnoVery.ru Callanish Stone Circle Reproduced by kind permission of Fay Godwin www.RodnoVery.ru The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles Their Nature and Legacy RONALD HUTTON BLACKWELL Oxford UK & Cambridge USA www.RodnoVery.ru Copyright © R. B. Hutton, 1991, 1993 First published 1991 First published in paperback 1993 Reprinted 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 Blackwell Publishers Ltd 108 Cowley Road Oxford 0X4 1JF, UK Blackwell Publishers Inc. 350 Main Street Maiden, Massachusetts 02148, USA All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Except in the United States of America, this book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Hutton, Ronald The pagan religions of the ancient British Isles: their nature and legacy / Ronald Hutton p. cm. ISBN 0-631-18946-7 (pbk) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Portals by Sergey Smelyakov [email protected]
    The Stone Portals by Sergey Smelyakov [email protected] This issue starts hosting of English edition of the e-book The Stone Portals (http://www.astrotheos.com/EPage_Portal_HOME.htm). The first Chapter presents the classification and general description of the stone artefacts which are considered the stone portals: stone – for their substance, and portals – for their occult destination. Their main classes are the pyramids, cromlechs, and stone mounds, as well as lesser forms – stone labyrinths et al. Then, chapter by chapter, we analyze the classes of these artefacts from the viewpoint of their occult and analytical properties, which, as it turned out, in different regions of the world manifest the similar properties in astronomical alignments, metrological and geometrical features, calendaric application, and occult destination. The second Chapter deals with the first, most extensive class of the Stone Portals – the Labyrinth- Temples presented by edifices of various types: Pyramids, mounds, etc. This study is preceded by an overview of astronomic and calendaric concepts that are used in the subsequent analysis. The religious and occult properties are analyzed relative to the main classes of the Labyrinth-Temples disposed in Mesoamerica and Eurasia, but from analytical point of view the main attention is devoted to Mesoamerican pyramids and European Passage Mounds. Thus a series of important properties are revealed re to their geometry, geodesy, astronomy, and metrology which show that their builders possessed extensive knowledge in all these areas. At this, it is shown that although these artefacts differ in their appearance, they have much in common in their design detail, religious and occult destination, and analytic properties, and on the world-wide scale.
    [Show full text]
  • STONE CIRCLE ENTRANCES Orkney To……
    ORKNEY TO SOMERSET THE ENTRANCES OF STONE CIRCLES AND HENGES IN BRITAIN/IRELAND 21 STONE CIRCLES,31 ENTRANCES A Research Booklet 1 Photograph from Records In Stone,editor C.L.N Ruggles,2002,CUP.Chapter 7 "without Sharp North"Alexander Thom and the great Stone Circles of Cumbria,by Mr Aubrey Burl.Photo is of Castlerigg North entrance by Mr Aubrey Burl. 2 INDEX PART ONE,TWO - FIRST TEN SITES PART THREE - ELEVEN MORE SITES RESULTS PART FOUR - OTHER SITES,CONCLUSIONS PART FIVE - NEWGRANGE REFS COPYRIGHT INFO All Photographs by M.Butler,except where indicated otherwise.If otherwise any Photographs used are complient with the Creative Commons License or RESEARCH terms. As are some of the quotations used.All references are indicated. The rest of the quoted material,permissions were sought or obtained. A lot of info,Photographs used in this Booklet comes from the Magnificant WIKIPEDIA ENCYCLOPEDIA, GEOGRAPH and the book 3 RECORDS IN STONE Without these sources,this Booklet could not have been built .So in part is a Homage to these Sources. Thanks to PDF24. Copyright m.butler 2017.This is a published Research Booklet,that is pub,ished under the Creative Commons License. Written and published in/from Gnomon Towers,Lancs. INTRODUCTION As an Amateur Archeoastronomer,who started to study my nearest Stone Circle,some years ago,[the remenants on Cheetham Close,Turton,Lancs], I found i needed specific information about Entrance way bearings for around 30 stone circles,the most well known ones in Britain.As i appear to have uncovered evidence of an entrance at the Turton Circle and needed to compare this entrance with similar Monuments.Cheetham Close stone circle remenants,are not photographic,the circle stones are either lying flat,or just the bottom 0.5 m stumps remain,after vandalism in the 1800s.In Summer nothing is visible,the marsh grass covers the circle stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Henges and Circles
    Prehistoric Henges and Circles On 1st April 2015 the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England changed its common name from English Heritage to Historic England. We are now re-branding all our documents. Although this document refers to English Heritage, it is still the Commission's current advice and guidance and will in due course be re-branded as Historic England. Please see our website for up to date contact information, and further advice. We welcome feedback to help improve this document, which will be periodically revised. Please email comments to [email protected] We are the government's expert advisory service for England's historic environment. We give constructive advice to local authorities, owners and the public. We champion historic places helping people to understand, value and care for them, now and for the future. HistoricEngland.org.uk/advice Introductions to Heritage Assets Prehistoric Henges and Circles May 2011 INTRODUCTION In the 3rd and early 2nd millennia BC a remarkable reflecting considerable variation in their size, shape series of circular monuments was built across Britain, and layout. comprising varying combinations of earthwork banks Standing stones, whether single or paired, may be and ditches, timber posts and standing stones. Although better discussed with stone alignments, but they can be archaeologists have traditionally classified these considered here because they are broadly of the same monuments into different categories of henges, stone period, demonstrate the same upright principle, and circles and timber circles, the types cannot always be some are directly associated with stone circles. clearly differentiated and may occur as components of the same site; it seems to be their shared circular form Distributions of stone circles and henges are largely that is most significant.
    [Show full text]