A Prize for Membrane Magic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Prize for Membrane Magic View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Leading Edge BenchMarks A Prize for Membrane Magic Suzanne R. Pfeffer1,* 1Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5307, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.014 The 2013 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine has been awarded to James Rothman, Randy Schekman, and Thomas Su¨ dhof ‘‘for their discoveries of machinery regulating vesicle traffic, a major transport system in our cells’’. I present a personal view of the membrane trafficking field, highlighting the contributions of these three Nobel laureates in a historical context. Our story begins in 1974, when I was a UC transport and localization in the cell.’’ transport from the endoplasmic reticulum Berkeley undergraduate. Jim Rothman But how proteins were transported from (ER) to the Golgi (Baker et al., 1988) and in was studying the properties of phospho- their site of synthesis to the cell surface 1990, published a careful double-mutant lipids in membrane bilayers with Eugene was not yet known. electron microscopy study that ordered Kennedy at Harvard, and Randy Schek- In 1976, Schekman began his lab as all the SEC gene products. Because man, who had just completed a PhD at an Assistant Professor at the University vesicles accumulated as intermediates Stanford University for work with Arthur of California at Berkeley, and chose to upon loss of the function of certain SEC Kornberg on DNA replication, joined the study protein secretion in baker’s yeast. gene products, this study was the first lab of Jonathan Singer at UC San Diego I first met Schekman then, as a biochem- to demonstrate the role of discrete to study protein mobility in cell mem- istry major, working in a lab on the same transport vesicles as true intermediates branes. Singer and Garth Nicholson had floor. Lee Hartwell, then at the University in the process by which proteins move just published a fluid mosaic model for of Washington, had just reported his use through the secretory pathway in yeast. the organization of lipids in bilayers. It is of yeast genetics to identify the genes Schekman and his colleagues spent hard to imagine that the simple structure responsible for driving the cell-division the next several years cloning the genes of cellular membranes was still being cycle, which yielded Hartwell a Nobel encoding SEC proteins and examining debated at that time. During the same Prize in Medicine or Physiology in 2001 their functions in driving vesicle transport year, George Palade, with Albert Claude with Paul Nurse and Tim Hunt. Today, from the ER to the Golgi complex. His and Christian de Duve, was awarded the yeast is a very popular experimental work led to the discovery of the COP-II Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine system, but in 1976, it was not at all clear coat that drives this process (Figure 1C) for his groundbreaking electron micro- that yeast would contain a secretory (Barlowe et al., 1994). The fundamental scopy studies of protein secretion from pathway or whether secretion in yeast importance of this discovery is best the exocrine pancreas. It was Palade would in any way, reflect pathways used appreciated when one considers that who established the concept that proteins by human cells. Schekman and a grad- more than one-third of the human synthesized on membrane-bound ribo- uate student, Peter Novick, took a very genome encodes proteins that must somes are transported, vectorially, into bold step and established a set of traverse the secretory pathway, and the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum conditional mutant yeast strains that COP-II-coated vesicles carry them from (ER) before transport to the Golgi com- were temperature sensitive for cell-sur- the ER to the Golgi. Nothing was known plex and secretory storage granules for face growth (Novick and Schekman about the molecular basis for this process subsequent export from cells. In 1974, 1979). These strains were termed, sec before Schekman’s pioneering work. And the concept of the secretory pathway mutants for secretion mutants. the Schekman lab environment was so being used to create the limiting mem- Subsequent work by Schekman and encouraging of ‘‘collaborations’’ that a brane of cells was still only a supposition. colleagues identified 23 complementation number of lab member pairs got married And although Palade surmised that the groups and electron microscopy con- during this period. abundant, small vesicles that surrounded firmed that cells bearing sec mutations Two years after Schekman arrived at the Golgi complex in his electron micro- accumulated vesicles or other organelles UC Berkeley, James Rothman started graphs participated in transport between when grown at the nonpermissive tem- his lab at Stanford University. Also membrane compartments, this was not perature (Figure 1A) (Novick et al., 1980). inspired by Arthur Kornberg and his yet fully established (Palade, 1975). Later, inspired by his earlier training with colleagues in the Department of Gu¨ nter Blobel solved the first step of Arthur Kornberg and the success of Biochemistry, Rothman took a biochem- the Palade pathway, and he received the James Rothman and colleagues in recon- ical approach and set up a cell-free Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology in stituting membrane traffic events (see system to study ER-to-Golgi transport 1999 ‘‘for the discovery that proteins below), Schekman and coworkers estab- using mammalian cell components (Fries have intrinsic signals that govern their lished a cell-free system to study protein and Rothman 1980). Subsequent work Cell 155, December 5, 2013 ª2013 Elsevier Inc. 1203 Figure 1. Milestones from the Path to the Prize (A) Accumulation of secretory vesicles in mutant cells at the permissive (top) or nonpermissive temperature (bottom) (from Novick et al., 1980). (B) Purified COP-I vesicles that mediate intra-Golgi transport and transport from the Golgi to the ER (Malhotra, V., et al. [1989]. Cell 58, 329–336). (C) Purified COP-II vesicles that carry proteins from the ER to the Golgi (Barlowe et al., 1994). (D) A synapse from embryonic cultured hippocampal neurons showing normal synaptic vesicle morphology (Janz, R., et al. [1999]. Neuron 24, 1003–1016). A fraction of vesicles are docked at the active zone, poised for rapid release in a highly calcium dependent manner. revealed that the reconstituted reaction he was seeking. We now know that fractions and test their activity, it is likely represented transfer of a glycoprotein so-called COP-II-coated vesicles, discov- that none of the fractions will be active from one Golgi stack to another. Three ered by Schekman, are responsible for because the other nine essential compo- papers spearheaded by Bill Balch and this process, in all eukaryotes, large and nents are no longer there. Every assay Bill Dunphy in the Rothman laboratory in small. And Vivek Malhotra and Rothman needed to be carried out using biochem- the mid-1980s reported a more stream- were the first to show that COP-I vesicles ical complementation—and lucky for lined assay and showed that the donor mediate protein transport within the Golgi Rothman, only one component was and acceptor membranes for the reaction stack (Figure 1B). These independent sensitive to NEM. This meant that assays represented distinct stacks of Golgi discoveries in the Schekman and Roth- of different fractions could be carried out membranes (cf. Balch et al., 1984). I man laboratories would not have been in the presence of a small amount of worked in Rothman’s lab as a postdoc in possible without the help of the electron NEM-treated cytosol to reveal the desired 1984 and 1985 when this work had just microscopist, Lelio Orci. activity. been published; I followed the subse- A very important breakthrough came The next breakthrough came when quent developments closely as a new when Rothman and coworkers purified Rothman and colleagues cloned the faculty member in a nearby lab. the first enzyme that was needed for gene encoding the NSF protein and found Many cell biologists were very skeptical the in vitro transport reaction they had it was homologous to the SEC18 gene of the in vitro findings that Rothman reconstituted (Block et al., 1988). They product discovered by Schekman and reported in the mid-1980s. The work identified a protein that had an N-ethyl- coworkers to be essential for membrane represented the first reconstitution of a maleimide (NEM)-sensitive, active site transport in yeast (Wilson et al., 1989) membrane trafficking step in the test thiol group that was needed for the and had been cloned and sequenced tube, and up to this time, microscopists in vitro transport reaction. The protein earlier by Scott Emr, a former Schekman rather than biochemists had dominated was named, NSF for NEM-sensitive fac- postdoc. This discovery demonstrated the field. Complicating matters was the tor. While today this sounds straightfor- that the process that Rothman had recon- fact that Rothman is a forceful visionary ward, imagine that you have an assay for stituted reflected a physiological and who was so eager to move the field for- a process that requires addition of crude highly conserved process. Now, two ward that a few mistakes were made cytosolic proteins, and ten proteins are entirely independent lines of investigation along the way. For example, at one point, provided by this crude cytosol. If you could proceed synergistically to reveal Rothman believed that clathrin-coated want to purify those proteins, you might the molecular events mediating these vesicles carry proteins from the ER to use chromatography to separate cytosol fundamental cellular processes. Doug the Golgi. A few missteps did not deter according to charge or size.
Recommended publications
  • RANDY SCHEKMAN Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA
    GENES AND PROTEINS THAT CONTROL THE SECRETORY PATHWAY Nobel Lecture, 7 December 2013 by RANDY SCHEKMAN Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA. Introduction George Palade shared the 1974 Nobel Prize with Albert Claude and Christian de Duve for their pioneering work in the characterization of organelles interrelated by the process of secretion in mammalian cells and tissues. These three scholars established the modern field of cell biology and the tools of cell fractionation and thin section transmission electron microscopy. It was Palade’s genius in particular that revealed the organization of the secretory pathway. He discovered the ribosome and showed that it was poised on the surface of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) where it engaged in the vectorial translocation of newly synthesized secretory polypeptides (1). And in a most elegant and technically challenging investigation, his group employed radioactive amino acids in a pulse-chase regimen to show by autoradiograpic exposure of thin sections on a photographic emulsion that secretory proteins progress in sequence from the ER through the Golgi apparatus into secretory granules, which then discharge their cargo by membrane fusion at the cell surface (1). He documented the role of vesicles as carriers of cargo between compartments and he formulated the hypothesis that membranes template their own production rather than form by a process of de novo biogenesis (1). As a university student I was ignorant of the important developments in cell biology; however, I learned of Palade’s work during my first year of graduate school in the Stanford biochemistry department.
    [Show full text]
  • Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance Of
    Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance of United States Nobel Prize Winners in Science: Irrefutable Data and Exemplary Family Narratives—Backup Data and Information Andrew A. Beveridge, Queens and Graduate Center CUNY and Social Explorer, Inc. Lynn Caporale, Strategic Scientific Advisor and Author The following slides were presented at the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This project and paper is an outgrowth of that session, and will combine qualitative data on Nobel Prize Winners family histories along with analyses of the pattern of Nobel Winners. The first set of slides show some of the patterns so far found, and will be augmented for the formal paper. The second set of slides shows some examples of the Nobel families. The authors a developing a systematic data base of Nobel Winners (mainly US), their careers and their family histories. This turned out to be much more challenging than expected, since many winners do not emphasize their family origins in their own biographies or autobiographies or other commentary. Dr. Caporale has reached out to some laureates or their families to elicit that information. We plan to systematically compare the laureates to the population in the US at large, including immigrants and non‐immigrants at various periods. Outline of Presentation • A preliminary examination of the 609 Nobel Prize Winners, 291 of whom were at an American Institution when they received the Nobel in physics, chemistry or physiology and medicine • Will look at patterns of
    [Show full text]
  • Five Great Ideas of Biology
    GREATGREAT IDEASIDEAS OFOF BIOLOGYBIOLOGY Paul Nurse KITP Public Lecture, Feb 24, 2010 THETHE CELLCELL The basic unit of life ROBERTROBERT HOOKEHOOKE’’SS MICROSCOPEMICROSCOPE Cork Image: Past Present STEMSTEM IMAGES:IMAGES: PASTPAST ANDAND PRESENTPRESENT Nehemiah Grew (1682) ANTONIANTONI VANVAN LEEUWENHOEKLEEUWENHOEK MICROORGANISMSMICROORGANISMS VANVAN LEEUWENHOEK?LEEUWENHOEK? THEODORTHEODOR SCHWANNSCHWANN “We have seen that all organisms are composed of essentially like parts, namely, of cells.” (1839) RUDOLFRUDOLF VIRCHOWVIRCHOW “Every animal appears as a sum of vital units, each of which bears in itself the complete characteristics of life.” (1858) CELLCELL Rockefeller Nobel Prize Winners in Cell Biology George E. Palade (1974) Christian de Duve (1974) Albert Claude (1974) Günter Blobel (1999) MAMMALIANMAMMALIAN EMBRYOEMBRYO SPERMSPERM ANDAND EGGEGG THETHE CELLCELL The basic unit of life Underpins all reproduction and development Stem cells THETHE GENEGENE Basis of heredity GREGORGREGOR MENDELMENDEL MENDELMENDEL’’SS GARDENGARDEN PEASPEAS PEASPEAS 1919TH CENTURYCENTURY CHROMOSOMESCHROMOSOMES EDOUARDEDOUARD VANVAN BENEDENBENEDEN’’SS NEMATODENEMATODE CHROMOSOMESCHROMOSOMES PNEUMOCOCCUSPNEUMOCOCCUS Avery, MacLeod and McCarty, Rockefeller University (1944) DNADNA MOLECULEMOLECULE CENTRALCENTRAL DOGMADOGMA THETHE GENEGENE Basis of heredity Genotype to phenotype Implications for what we are EVOLUTIONEVOLUTION BYBY NATURALNATURAL SELECTIONSELECTION Life evolves Mechanism of natural selection ERASMUSERASMUS ANDAND CHARLESCHARLES DARWINDARWIN
    [Show full text]
  • George Palade 1912-2008
    George Palade, 1912-2008 Biography George Palade was born in November, 1912 in Jassy, Romania to an academic family. He graduated from the School of Medicine of the The Founding of Cell Biology University of Bucharest in 1940. His doctorial thesis, however, was on the microscopic anatomy of the cetacean delphinus Delphi. He The discipline of Cell Biology arose at Rockefeller University in the late practiced medicine in the second world war, and for a brief time af- 1940s and the 1950s, based on two complimentary techniques: cell frac- terwards before coming to the USA in 1946, where he met Albert tionation, pioneered by Albert Claude, George Palade, and Christian de Claude. Excited by the potential of the electron microscope, he Duve, and biological electron microscopy, pioneered by Keith Porter, joined the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, where he did Albert Claude, and George Palade. For the first time, it became possible his seminal work. He left Rockefeller in 1973 to chair the new De- to identify the components of the cell both structurally and biochemi- partment of Cell Biology at Yale, and then in 1990 he moved to the cally, and therefore begin understanding the functioning of cells on a University of California, San Diego as Dean for Scientific Affairs at molecular level. These individuals participated in establishing the Jour- the School of Medicine. He retired in 2001, at age 88. His first wife, nal of Cell Biology, (originally the Journal of Biochemical and Biophysi- Irina Malaxa, died in 1969, and in 1970 he married Marilyn Farquhar, cal Cytology), which later led, in 1960, to the organization of the Ameri- another prominent cell biologist, and his scientific collaborator.
    [Show full text]
  • Randy W. Schekman, Phd
    Randy W. Schekman, PhD Current Position Professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley Investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Editor-in-Chief, eLIFE Journal Education BA, molecular biology, University of California, Los Angeles PhD, biochemistry, Stanford University Awards Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2013 (shared with James E. Rothman and Thomas C. Südhof ) Albert Lasker Award for Basic Medical Research Eli Lilly Research Award in Microbiology and Immunology Lewis S. Rosenstiel Award in Basic Biomedical Science, Brandeis University Gairdner Foundation International Award Louisa Gross Horwitz Prize, Columbia University 2008 Dickson Prize in Medicine, University of Pittsburgh E.B. Wilson Medal, American Society for Cell Biology Memberships US National Academy of Sciences American Academy of Arts and Sciences American Society of Cell Biology American Association for the Advancement of Science American Philosophical Society Biography Traffic inside a cell is as complicated as rush hour near any metropolitan area. But drivers know how to follow the signs and roadways to reach their destinations. How do different cellular proteins "read" molecular signposts to find their way inside or outside of a cell? For the past three decades, Randy Schekman has been characterizing the traffic drivers that shuttle cellular proteins as they move in membrane-bound sacs, or vesicles, within a cell. His detailed elucidation of cellular travel patterns has provided fundamental knowledge about cells and has enhanced understanding of diseases that arise when bottlenecks impede some of the protein flow. His work earned him one of the most prestigious prizes in science, the 2002 Albert Lasker Award for Basic Medical Research, which he shared with James Rothman.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Ps Nobel Prizes for Site BEE 11.18.16 Revised 11.30.17.Pdf
    Nobel Laureates at the College of Physicians and Surgeons For years, College of Physicians and Surgeons alumni, faculty, and researchers have led groundbreaking clinical and basic scientific studies that have transformed our understanding of human biology and advanced the practice of medicine. On many occasions, this work has been honored with the Nobel Prize. The scope of research led by P&S Nobel laureates is tremendous. Although most of our prizewinners were honored for work in physiology or medicine, a few also received the prize for chemistry. Their research has fundamentally shaped the course of numerous fields, including cardiology, neuroscience, genetics, pharmaceutical development, and more. Our Nobel laureates include: André Cournand and Dickinson Richards (P&S’23), whose work at P&S on cardiac catheterization—a method of inserting a tiny tube into the heart—provided the basis for open-heart surgery and interventional cardiology Baruch Blumberg (P&S’51), who discovered the hepatitis B virus and helped develop a test and a vaccine for the virus Joshua Lederberg, a Columbia College and P&S graduate student who showed that bacteria can exchange genes when they reproduce, creating a way to model and study genetics in higher organisms Harold Varmus (P&S’66), who demonstrated how genes in normal human and animal cells can mutate to cause cancer, leading to a new generation of research on the genetic origins of cancer Eric Kandel, current University Professor, who showed how memories are stored in nerve cells, greatly enhancing
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Design in Physics and Biology: from the Origin of the Universe to the Origin of Life
    52 stephen c. meyer Pages 53–111 of Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe. The Proceedings of the Wethersfield Institute. Michael Behe, STEPHEN C. MEYER William A. Dembski, and Stephen C. Meyer (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2001. 2000 Homeland Foundation.) EVIDENCE FOR DESIGN IN PHYSICS AND BIOLOGY: FROM THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE TO THE ORIGIN OF LIFE 1. Introduction In the preceding essay, mathematician and probability theo- rist William Dembski notes that human beings often detect the prior activity of rational agents in the effects they leave behind.¹ Archaeologists assume, for example, that rational agents pro- duced the inscriptions on the Rosetta Stone; insurance fraud investigators detect certain ‘‘cheating patterns’’ that suggest intentional manipulation of circumstances rather than ‘‘natu- ral’’ disasters; and cryptographers distinguish between random signals and those that carry encoded messages. More importantly, Dembski’s work establishes the criteria by which we can recognize the effects of rational agents and distinguish them from the effects of natural causes. In brief, he shows that systems or sequences that are both ‘‘highly com- plex’’ (or very improbable) and ‘‘specified’’ are always produced by intelligent agents rather than by chance and/or physical- chemical laws. Complex sequences exhibit an irregular and improbable arrangement that defies expression by a simple formula or algorithm. A specification, on the other hand, is a match or correspondence between an event or object and an independently given pattern or set of functional requirements. As an illustration of the concepts of complexity and speci- fication, consider the following three sets of symbols: 53 54 stephen c.
    [Show full text]
  • Innate Immunity and Dendritic Cells in Kidney Disease and the Nobel Prize
    EDITORIALS www.jasn.org Innate Immunity and Dendritic nately, Janeway died in 2003 and was no longer eligible to receive the prize. Cells in Kidney Disease and the The discoveries of Hoffmann and Janeway alerted immu- nologists all over the world to the possibility of a new signal- Nobel Prize ing pathway, and in 1998, Bruce Beutler and colleagues at the † Howard Hughes Medical Institute in Dallas first identified Hans-Joachim Anders* and Christian Kurts TLR4 as recognizing bacterial endotoxin.5 Beutler’s approach *Medizinische Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universita¨t Mu¨ nchen-LMU, Campus Innenstadt, Munich, Germany; and †Institutes of Molecu- was as clever as simple. He took advantage of two well-known lar Medicine and Experimental Immunology (IMMEI), University lipopolysaccharide-resistant mouse strains to map the newly Clinic of Bonn, Bonn, Germany discovered loci of the Toll genes. In doing so, he realized that J Am Soc Nephrol 22: ●●●–●●●, 2011. endotoxin resistance was linked to loss-of-function muta- doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011100975 tions in the Tlr4 gene. Two more circumstances encouraged researchers from many disciplines to rush into this new area of science, pro- On December 10, 2011, the Nobel Prize for Physiology or ducing more than 18,000 related publications within the last Medicine will honor the work of Jules Hoffmann, Bruce 15 years: first, Tlr4 mutant mice as well as suitable immuno- Beutler, and Ralph Steinman for their landmark discoveries stimulatory compounds, now discovered as agonists for dis- in the field of immunology. This recognition brings wide at- tinct TLRs, became available at relatively low costs to every- tention to a paradigm shift in understanding how multicel- one, and second, Shizou Akira, in Osaka, produced null mice lular organisms sense and interpret their external and inter- for most TLRs and many other related genes, and did not nal environments in maintaining homeostasis or initiating hesitate to share them with collaborators and competitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Service History July 2012 AGM - September 2018 AGM
    Service History July 2012 AGM - September 2018 AGM The information in this Service History is true and complete to the best of The Society’s knowledge. If you are aware of any errors please let the Governance and Risk Manager know by email: [email protected] Service History Index DATES PAGE # 5 July 2012 – 24 July 2013 Page 1 24 July 2013 – 1 July 2014 Page 14 1 July 2014 – 7 July 2015 Page 28 7 July 2015 – 31 July 2016 Page 42 31 July 2016 – 12 July 2017 Page 60 12 July 2017 – 16 September 2018 Page 82 Service History: July 2012 AGM – Sept 2018 AGM Introduction Up until 2006 the service history of The Society’s members was captured in Grey Books. It was also documented between 1990-2013 in The Society’s old database iMIS, which will be migrated to the CRM member directory adopted in 2016. This document collates missing service history data from July 2012 to September 2018. Grey Books were relaunched as ‘Grey Records’ in 2019 beginning with the period from the September AGM 2018 up until July AGM 2019. There will now be a Grey Record published every year reflecting the previous year’s service history. The Grey Record will now showcase service history from Member Forum to Member Forum (typically held in the Winter). 5 July 2012 – 24 July 2013 Honorary Officers (and Trustees) POSITION NAME President Jonathan Ashmore Deputy President Richard Vaughan-Jones Honorary Treasurer Rod Dimaline Education & Outreach Committee Chair Blair Grubb Meetings Committee Chair David Wyllie Policy Committee Chair Mary Morrell Membership & Grants Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Balcomk41251.Pdf (558.9Kb)
    Copyright by Karen Suzanne Balcom 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Karen Suzanne Balcom Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine Committee: E. Glynn Harmon, Supervisor Julie Hallmark Billie Grace Herring James D. Legler Brooke E. Sheldon Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine by Karen Suzanne Balcom, B.A., M.L.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2005 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my first teachers: my father, George Sheldon Balcom, who passed away before this task was begun, and to my mother, Marian Dyer Balcom, who passed away before it was completed. I also dedicate it to my dissertation committee members: Drs. Billie Grace Herring, Brooke Sheldon, Julie Hallmark and to my supervisor, Dr. Glynn Harmon. They were all teachers, mentors, and friends who lifted me up when I was down. Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my committee: Julie Hallmark, Billie Grace Herring, Jim Legler, M.D., Brooke E. Sheldon, and Glynn Harmon for their encouragement, patience and support during the nine years that this investigation was a work in progress. I could not have had a better committee. They are my enduring friends and I hope I prove worthy of the faith they have always showed in me. I am grateful to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • April 28 Sir Paul Nurse
    MONDAY, APRIL 26th 8 pm We look forward to welcoming to Kenton SIR PAUL NURSE RATHER THAN GIVE A TALK, WE ARE VERY FORTUNATE IN THAT SIR PAUL IS HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ON HIS EXTENSIVE CAREER AND HOBBIES PLEASE HAVE YOUR QUESTIONS READY OR SEND THEM IN BEFORE THE MEETING Paul Nurse is a geneticist and cell biologist who has worked on how the eukaryotic cell cycle is controlled. His major work has been on the cyclin dependent protein kinases and how they regulate cell reproduction. He is Director of the Francis Crick Institute in London, and has served as President of the Royal Society, Chief Executive of Cancer Research UK and President of Rockefeller University. He shared the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine and has received the Albert Lasker Award, the Gairdner Award, the Louis Jeantet Prize and the Royal Society's Royal and Copley Medals. He was knighted by The Queen in 1999, received the Legion d'honneur in 2003 from France, and the Order of the Rising Sun in 2018 from Japan. He served for 15 years on the Council of Science and Technology, advising the Prime Minister and Cabinet, and is presently a Chief Scientific Advisor for the European Union. As well as his many medical accomplishments, amazingly Paul also has time to fly planes and engage in varied hobbies Paul flies gliders and vintage aeroplanes and has been a qualified bush pilot. He also likes the theatre, hill-walking, going to museums and art galleries, and running very slowly. All our Zoom sessions are available on the Kenton https://us02web.zoom.us/j/3531782577? YouTube channel: pwd=N0tlSWxxUGZmOEUrM1ZzclJFN1pzdz09 Kenton Shul In The Park Goes Live.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine@Yale U
    @ MedicineAdvancing Biomedical Science, Education and Health Care YaleVolume 4, Issue 3 July/August 2008 Leading scientist is appointed new chair of Cell Biology Membrane traffi c expert and chair of the School of Medicine’s to Yale’s recently protein-coding genes in the human Department of Cell Biology. Roth- opened West Cam- genome, providing fresh insights into will head a department man will come to Yale from Columbia pus in West Haven, disease and new molecular targets for that has shaped the fi eld University’s College of Physicians and Conn., where he will therapy. Under Rothman’s leadership Surgeons, where he is now a professor launch a Center for the Department of Cell Biology will James E. Rothman, F>:, one of the in the Department of Physiology and High-Throughput be signifi cantly expanded, and will be world’s foremost experts on mem- Biophysics, the Clyde and Helen Wu Cell Biology. At the co-located at the West Campus along brane traffi cking, the means by which Professor of Chemical Biology and new center, multi- with its present location at the main proteins and other materials are director of the Columbia Genome +BNFT3PUINBO disciplinary teams campus of the School of Medicine. transported within and between cells, Center. of scientists will develop tools and For his decades of seminal re- has been named the Fergus F. Wal- In addition to directing Cell techniques to rapidly decipher the cel- search on the transport of molecules lace Professor of Biomedical Sciences Biology, Rothman is the fi rst recruit lular functions of the
    [Show full text]