DOCSLIB.ORG

Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 Draft Delivery Plan (2020-2025)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 Draft Delivery Plan (2020-2025) GREATER MANCHESTER TRANSPORT STRATEGY 2040 DRAFT DELIVERY PLAN (2020-2025) 4th January 2019 Contents Introduction by the Greater Manchester Mayor ................................................................................... 4 Background – Challenges and Opportunities .......................................................................................... 6 Supporting Sustainable Economic Growth.......................................................................................... 8 Protecting our Environment .............................................................................................................. 12 Improving Quality of Life ................................................................................................................... 14 Developing an Innovative City-region ............................................................................................... 16 Greater Manchester’s Plan for Homes, Jobs and the Environment...................................................... 18 Our Vision for 2040 ............................................................................................................................... 20 Purpose of this Delivery Plan ................................................................................................................ 23 Delivery ................................................................................................................................................. 24 Our Customer Focus .......................................................................................................................... 24 Developing future transport interventions ....................................................................................... 25 Our focus for the next five years ....................................................................................................... 25 Supporting the GMSF ........................................................................................................................ 25 Structure of the Delivery sections ..................................................................................................... 26 Public Transport: Bus ........................................................................................................................ 30 Public Transport: Metrolink and Bus Rapid Transit .......................................................................... 34 Public Transport: Rail ........................................................................................................................ 39 Streets for All: Local Highways .......................................................................................................... 45 Streets for All: Walking and Cycling .................................................................................................. 50 Streets for All: Motorways and Trunk Roads .................................................................................... 53 Streets for All: Freight and logistics .................................................................................................. 56 Streets for All: Asset Management ................................................................................................... 58 Integration: Clean Air and Carbon ..................................................................................................... 60 Integration: Future Mobility and Innovation .................................................................................... 64 Integration: Fares and Ticketing ........................................................................................................ 66 Integration: Behaviour change .......................................................................................................... 68 Integration: Safety and security ........................................................................................................ 70 Integration: Town Centres and Interchanges ................................................................................... 71 Cost, Funding and Delivery.................................................................................................................... 73 Current funding ................................................................................................................................. 73 Future Scheme Prioritisation and Delivery ....................................................................................... 76 Future Capital Funding ...................................................................................................................... 76 Further Transport Devolution ........................................................................................................... 77 Measuring Success ................................................................................................................................ 80 Next steps .............................................................................................................................................. 82 GREATER MANCHESTER TRANSPORT STRATEGY 2040 | 2 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................. 83 APPENDIX: List of interventions ............................................................................................................ 87 In the next five years, we are committed to delivering… ................................................................. 87 In the next five years, we aim to complete business cases for early delivery of… ........................... 98 In the next five years, we will develop options for… ...................................................................... 106 Beyond this five year Delivery Plan, we will investigate… .............................................................. 115 GREATER MANCHESTER TRANSPORT STRATEGY 2040 | 3 INTRODUCTION BY THE GREATER MANCHESTER MAYOR Introduction by the Greater Manchester Mayor Transport is the lifeblood of every town and city. It’s how people get to work, get to school, meet their friends and ultimately live engaged, productive and fulfilled lives. It’s also closely linked to some of the top issues facing our city-region, including congestion, air quality, our health and the attractiveness of our streets and town centres. That is why I have made transport one of my top priorities. It is absolutely vital we get this right so we can achieve our economic, social and environmental objectives. I am committed to pushing for continuous improvements to our transport networks so it can help make Greater Manchester one of the best places in the world to grow up, get on and grow old. The reality is that our current transport system needs further investment and reform – including more devolution – so it can fully support Greater Manchester’s huge potential. Congestion continues to threaten the flow of commuters, goods and services. Poor air quality, primarily as a result of polluting vehicles and worsened by traffic congestion, damages the health of people across our city-region. And key public transport modes, particularly rail and bus, are under-performing, and together with Metrolink are not properly integrated into one unified network. This is largely as result of historic under-investment by successive Governments, combined with an inadequate regulatory and legislative system which has fragmented transport decision-making, leaving the city-region without the ability to bring transport modes together into one integrated system. GREATER MANCHESTER TRANSPORT STRATEGY 2040 | 4 INTRODUCTION BY THE GREATER MANCHESTER MAYOR Greater Manchester’s initial devolution settlement has partly reversed this trend, which is to be welcomed. And in terms of new transport infrastructure, the past decade has been one of unprecedented local investment – for example our ever popular and growing Metrolink network, the ground-breaking Leigh-Salford-Manchester guided busway, the development of new interchanges, major new highways schemes such as the A6 Manchester Airport Relief Road, and the UK’s most ambitious Cycling and Walking investment programme. However, there’s much more to do if we are to fulfil our agreed 2040 Transport Strategy and provide all our residents and businesses with the clean, integrated and reliable transport system they need. The Government promised us a Northern Powerhouse, and the case is now irrefutable that greater investment and devolution in the North, including in Greater Manchester, should be a national priority. Our agreed 2040 Transport Strategy sets out what we are aiming for – world-class connections that support long-term, sustainable economic growth and access to opportunity for all. Building on our past successes this Delivery Plan sets out the shorter term measures and schemes our city-region so desperately needs. As is the Greater Manchester way, it has been developed in close co-operation with TfGM, GMCA and the local authorities to ensure our transport investments support and are supported by the new housing and commercial development sites in our draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework. It also outlines some of the key measures that we will need to develop and implement if we are to clean our air. By dealing with the key challenges on our transport network – poor air quality, congestion and improving public transport, cycling and walking – this joined-up plan sets a clear
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manchester Metrolink Tram System
    Feature New Promise of LRT Systems Manchester Metrolink Tram System William Tyson Introduction to Greater city that could be used by local rail into the city centre either in tunnel or on Manchester services—taking them into the central the street. area—to complete closure and I carried out an appraisal of these options The City of Manchester (pop. 500,000) is replacement of the services by buses. Two and showed that closure of the lines had at the heart of the Greater Manchester options were to convert some heavy rail a negative benefit-to-cost ratio, and that— conurbation comprised of 10 lines to light rail (tram) and extend them at the very least—they should be kept municipalities that is home to 2.5 million people. The municipalities appoint a Passenger Transport Authority (PTA) for the Figure 1 Metrolink Future Network whole area to set policies and the Greater 1 Victoria Manchester Passenger Transport Executive 2 Shudehill 3 Market Street Rochdale Town Centre 4 Mosley Street (GMPTE) to implement them. Buses Newbold Manchester 5 Piccadilly Gardens Drake Street Piccadilly Kingsway Business Park 6 Rochdale provide most public transport. They are 7 St Peter's Square Railway Milnrow Station deregulated and can compete with each 8 G-Max (for Castlefield) Newhey London 9 Cornbrook other and with other modes. There is a 0 Pomona Bury - Exchange Quay local rail network serving Manchester, and = Salford Quays Buckley Wells ~ Anchorage ! Harbour City linking it with the surrounding areas and @ Broadway Shaw and Crompton # Langworthy also other regions of the country. Street $ Tradfford Bar trams vanished from Greater Manchester % Old Trafford Radcliffe ^ Wharfside* & Manchester United* in 1951, but returned in a very different * Imperial War Museum for the North* ( Lowry Centre form in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Append. 2 for 2040 Transport Delivery Plan
    Rochdale Summary GMTS2040 Implementation Plan 15.10.20 1. Introduction This Implementation Plan sets out how we will work towards our priorities including economic growth, improving the environment and social inclusion by building on Rochdale’s planned and current transport projects, many of which are set out in the Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 5-Year Delivery Plan (2020-2025). While the 5-year Delivery Plan tends to consider large, medium and long-term transport schemes, this Implementation Plan is mainly focussed on local, neighbourhood level priorities and interventions to 2025. A summary of strategic schemes within the 5-Year Delivery Plan are included on Map 1. Rochdale Council in its Corporate Plan 2019-2022 “Prosperous People and Places” outlines a vision of “Making our Borough a great place to grow up, get on and live well”. It places an emphasis on prosperity for people who are healthy, safe, happy and available to participate fully in life, in places that grow and change to provide strong local economies providing opportunities and enhance quality of life. Indicators of success in achieving this are: Accessible quality highways and transport options including cycling and walking; Air and land, free from pollution and infrastructure that protects against climate change by using natural and renewable resources; More people are physically active including the over 50’s; People have access to good or outstanding places of learning; Reduced crime and anti-social behaviour. To strive for this prosperity the Council
    [Show full text]
  • Minor Eye Conditions Service (MECS) Tameside and Glossop Pharmacies That Are Currently Providing Mecs
    Minor Eye Conditions Service (MECS) Tameside and Glossop Pharmacies that are currently providing MECs Name Address Telephone 169 Mossley Road, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL6 Adams Pharmacy 6NE 0161 339 8889 Stalybridge Resource Centre, 2 Waterloo Road, Stalybridge. Adams Pharmacy SK15 2AU 0161 303 8599 Alipharma Ltd Thornley House Med Ctr) 11 Thornley Street, Hyde SK14 1JY 0161 351 1386 Asda Cavendish Street, Ashton Under Lyne, OL6 7DP 0161 342 6610 Asda Water Street, Hyde, Cheshire, SK14 1BD 0161 882 5700 22 Stockport Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL7 Ashton Pharmacy 0LB 0161 330 4389 Ashton Primary Care Centre Pharmacy 193 Old Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL6 7SR 0161 820 8281 Audenshaw Pharmacy 3 Chapel Street, Audenshaw, Manchester, M34 5DE 0161 320 9123 Boots 116-118 Station Road, Hadfield, Glossop SK13 1AJ 01457 853635 Hattersley Health Centre, Hattersley Road East, Hattersley, Boots Hyde SK14 3EH 0161 368 8498 Boots 72 Market Street, Droylsden, Manchester M43 6DE 0161 370 1626 Boots 30 Concorde Way, Dukinfield, Cheshire SK16 4DB 0161 330 3586 Boots 173 Mossley Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 6NE 0161 330 1303 Boots 1-3 Bow Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 6BU 0161 330 1746 Boots UK Ltd 15-17 Staveleigh Way, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 7JL 0161 308 2326 Boots UK Ltd 19 High Street West, Glossop, Derbyshire SK13 8AL 01457 852011 Boots UK Ltd 1A Market Place, Hyde, Cheshire SK14 2LX 0161 368 2249 Boots UK Ltd 33 Queens Walk, Droylsden, Manchester M43 7AD 0161 370 1402 Crown Point North, Retail Park, Ashton Road, Denton M34
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Upgrade Plan – London North Eastern and East Midlands (LNE&EM)
    Railway Upgrade Plan – London North Eastern and East Midlands (LNE&EM) 2017/18 London North Eastern and East Midlands Glossary CaSL – Cancelled and Significantly Late. This measures how many trains are cancelled or are more than 29 minutes late at their terminating station. MAA – Moving Annual Average. PPM – Public Performance Measure. This is the percentage of trains that arrive at their terminating station within five minutes (for commuter services) or ten minutes (for long distance services) of when they were due. Reduction in railway work complaints measure – We believe that the number of complaints that we receive from the public about our work could be reduced if we improve how we inform people about work due to take place, and ensure all our staff behave considerately towards those living and working close to the railway. Each route is therefore aiming to reduce the number of complaints it receives in the coming year. Right Time Arrival – This measures the percentage of trains arriving at their terminating station early or within 59 seconds of schedule. 16 London North Eastern and East Midlands London North Eastern and East Midlands 17 London North Eastern and East Midlands (LNE&EM) Introduction from the route managing director – Rob McIntosh On LNE&EM, our purpose can be summarised with a simple phrase – we care about our people, we are proud about our work and we are passionate about railways. Each day, we serve around 20 per cent of the UK’s travelling public, with hundreds of commuter and leisure services connecting major cities and conurbations, supporting regional economies up and down the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Rail Campaigner Number 48 – March 2020
    Yorkshire Rail Campaigner Number 48 – March 2020 Yorkshire President: Alan Whitehouse: Vice-Presidents: Mike Crowhurst, Alan Williams & Chris Hyomes Trans-Pennine Upgrade Under Threat! By Mark Parry With the proposed trans-Pennine high speed line being supported, we feared the upgrade of the existing line had been quietly forgotten. Transpennine Express new rolling stock at Manchester Piccadilly–Photo by Robert Pritchard The following is a joint press release from our branch and HADRAG: The Halifax & District Rail Action Group; SHRUG: Stalybridge to Huddersfield Rail Users Group; UCVRSTG: Upper Calder Valley Renaissance Sustainable Transport Group. CAMPAIGNERS in West Yorkshire are extremely concerned about lack of progress by the Government and Network Rail on infrastructure proposals that should deliver improvements for travellers in the next few years, including the TransPennine Route Upgrade (TRU). Three rail user groups and the Yorkshire Branch of Railfuture have written to Andrew Haines, Chief Executive of Network Rail, who was recently been quoted as casting doubt on TRU. In a magazine interview (RAIL 897, 29 Jan’2020) Haines had said the scope of TRU could depend on the high-speed rail proposal “Northern Powerhouse Rail” (NPR). The campaigners say NPR is decades away and will not benefit stations on regional routes that desperately need investment now. Continued overleaf… Railfuture, Yorkshire & North West Joint Branch Meeting This meeting has been postponed because of concerns about the Coronavirus. We will contact members later about alterative arrangements. 1 | Railfuture: Yorkshire Rail Campaigner 4 8 – M a r c h 2020 The campaigners have also written to Secretary of State for Transport Grant Shapps MP, and to the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, calling for urgent, overdue projects to go ahead without further delay.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing, Credit and Brexit
    Housing, Credit and Brexit Ben Ansell∗ Abstract Dozens of articles have been drafted attempting to explain the narrow vic- tory for the Leave campaign in Britain’s EU referendum in June 2016. Yet, hitherto, and despite a general interest in ‘Left Behind’ commentary, few writ- ers have drawn attention to the connection between the Brexit vote and the distribution of British housing costs. This memo examines the connection be- tween house prices and both aggregate voting during the EU referendum and individual vote intention beforehand. I find a very strong connection at the local authority, ward, and individual level between house prices and support for the Remain campaign, one that even holds up within regions and local authorities. Preliminary analysis suggests that housing values reflect long-run social differences that are just as manifest in attitudes to immigration as Brexit. Local ‘ecologies of unease’ (Reeves and Gimpel, 2012) appear a crucial force behind Brexit. This is a short memo on housing, credit and Brexit to be presented at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, April 2017. ∗Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions, Nuffield College, University of Oxford. [email protected]. My acknowledgements and thanks go to Jane Gingrich for the provision of local economic and housing data. 1 1 Introduction If there is one saving grace of Brexit for the British higher education system it is a boom of Brexit studies that began pouring forth as the dust settled on June 24th 2016. Most scholars have coalesced around an understanding of Brexit that to some extent mirrors that implicit in Theresa May’s quasi hard Brexit strategy - Brexit was caused by both economic and cultural forces, with opposition to the European Union based on concerns about immigration and of declining cultural and social status rather than economic deprivation or actual migration levels per se (Kaufmann, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • PTA Doc Annex 11
    Annex 11 Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority (GMPTA) GMPTA Policy Plan A11.2 The Strategic Development Plan, 1999, A11.1 The Public Transport Policy Plan is a statement is a companion document to the LTP. It sets out the of the Authority’s policies for the period 1999-2004. Authority’s broad investment proposals over a ten year It recognises the crucial strategic role of GMPTA in period, and is entirely consistent with the LTP strategy. developing the Greater Manchester public transport network in accordance with LTP objectives. Policies Role in delivering the Greater are set out according to seven key themes: Manchester transport strategy Passengers First – A11.3 The Authority has a county-wide responsibility adopting a clear customer-orientation in the for the promotion of public transport and as such will services that are co-ordinated, specified or take forward the public transport initiatives contained provided by the Authority in the LTP. This will be achieved by: Integrating the networks – bringing forward measures proposed under working with operators and other partners the Quality Partnership Agreement to which through the Integration Project to ensure that GMPTA is a joint signatory, along with the the different service networks such as bus, rail District Councils, the Highways Agency, and Metrolink complement each other, are easy public transport operators, Railtrack and to use and are integrated with cycling and Manchester Airport walking overseeing the implementation of the Building Partnerships – Metrolink ‘single
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Capitalised Expenditure
    Analysis of Capitalised Expenditure Main contractor Total Capital spend per accounts 373,677,000 Analysed as: Construction projects 163,740,848 Non-construction assets 207,109,092 Spend < £100,000 2,827,060 373,677,000 Project Type Start Completion New Build Fit-out Construction Projects Refurbishment Date Date Bus Stations and related Schemes Bolton Moor Lane Bus Station Toilets x Mitie Property Services May 2007 July 2007 Shudehill Interchange x Costain plc Nov 2003 Nov 2005 Middleton Bus Station x Wrenco (Contractors) Ltd May 2007 Oct 2007 Oldham West St Bus Station x Thomas Barnes & Sons Plc Aug 2005 Aug 2006 Bolton Interchange x Lowbury Construction Ltd Jan 2005 Mar 2006 Bolton Interchange - Overbridge x C Spencer Ltd (Barrow-upon-Humber) Mar 2005 Sept 2005 Bury Interchange: Toilets x Allenbuild Ltd Jan 2011 May 2011 Rochdale Hydro Electric Power x Spaans Babcock Nov 2010 Aug 2011 Metrolink Metrolink: Track Renewal - Altrincham / Bury Lines Carillion Metrolink: System Renewals Stagecoach Metrolink Metrolink: Withins Lane Bridge-Renewals Carillion Metrolink: Besses O'th Barn-Waterproofing Carillion Metrolink: Navigation Rd Park & Ride facility Balfour Beatty Metrolink: Altrincham Overhead Line Replacement Stagecoach Metrolink Metrolink: Stop Improvements & Platform Upgrades Galliford Try Metrolink: City Centre Track Renewals Stagecoach Metrolink Metrolink: Piccadilly Gardens Stop Improvements Balfour Beatty Metrolink: Mosley St/St Peter's Sq Stops Improvements Balfour Beatty Metrolink: Piccadilly Undercroft Stop Improvements Stagecoach
    [Show full text]
  • HADRAG Response to National Infrastructure Commission Request for Evidence on Rail in the North and Midlands, May 2020
    HADRAG: The Halifax & District Rail Action Group The Electric Railway Charter www.HADRAG.com on the Calder Valley Line www.electriccharter.wordpress.com Response written by J Stephen Waring, Chair, HADRAG and joint coordinator, Electric Railway Charter, HADRAG response to National Infrastructure Commission request for evidence on rail in the North and Midlands, May 2020 Contents A General comments and specific objectives …page 2 A1 Introducing ourselves and our concerns. …page 2 A2 Re-purposing rail post-Covid19 and to tackle the climate crisis – and the need to prioritise urgent modernisation of classic routes over planning long term high-speed proposals…page 3 A3 Key infrastructure objectives …page 4 A3.1 Electrification – need for go-ahead for “Northern Sparks” rolling programme prioritising the Calder Valley Line …page 4 A3.2 Capacity improvements close to and benefiting the Calder Valley Line (CVL) and its users …page 6 (a) TransPennine route upgrade – capacity improvements to enable wider regional connectivity and service frequency …page 6 (b) Capacity improvements at key junctions and stations – Manchester’s Castlefield corridor; Leeds, York …page 6 (c) Capacity improvements close to the Calder Valley Line – passing loops, additional platforms e.g. at Halifax …page 8 A4 Further objective enabling enhanced or additional services over existing under-used routes where infrastructure already exists …page 8 A5 Northern Powerhouse Rail and a Leeds-Manchester high-speed route – how could this benefit Calder Valley Line and other local rail-served communities? …page 9 A6 Integration and fares …page 10 A7 Conclusion – to fast-track the classic rail projects …page 10 B HADRAG and Electric Railway Charter responses to NIC’s 11 specific questions …page 11-14 HADRAG: The Halifax & District Rail Action Group: Page 1 A General comments and specific objectives A1 Introducing ourselves and our concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • NRT Index Stations
    Network Rail Timetable OFFICIAL# May 2021 Station Index Station Table(s) A Abbey Wood T052, T200, T201 Aber T130 Abercynon T130 Aberdare T130 Aberdeen T026, T051, T065, T229, T240 Aberdour T242 Aberdovey T076 Abererch T076 Abergavenny T131 Abergele & Pensarn T081 Aberystwyth T076 Accrington T041, T097 Achanalt T239 Achnasheen T239 Achnashellach T239 Acklington T048 Acle T015 Acocks Green T071 Acton Bridge T091 Acton Central T059 Acton Main Line T117 Adderley Park T068 Addiewell T224 Addlestone T149 Adisham T212 Adlington (cheshire) T084 Adlington (lancashire) T082 Adwick T029, T031 Aigburth T103 Ainsdale T103 Aintree T105 Airbles T225 Airdrie T226 Albany Park T200 Albrighton T074 Alderley Edge T082, T084 Aldermaston T116 Aldershot T149, T155 Aldrington T188 Alexandra Palace T024 Alexandra Parade T226 Alexandria T226 Alfreton T034, T049, T053 Allens West T044 Alloa T230 Alness T239 Alnmouth For Alnwick T026, T048, T051 Alresford (essex) T011 Alsager T050, T067 Althorne T006 Page 1 of 53 Network Rail Timetable OFFICIAL# May 2021 Station Index Station Table(s) Althorpe T029 A Altnabreac T239 Alton T155 Altrincham T088 Alvechurch T069 Ambergate T056 Amberley T186 Amersham T114 Ammanford T129 Ancaster T019 Anderston T225, T226 Andover T160 Anerley T177, T178 Angmering T186, T188 Annan T216 Anniesland T226, T232 Ansdell & Fairhaven T097 Apperley Bridge T036, T037 Appleby T042 Appledore (kent) T192 Appleford T116 Appley Bridge T082 Apsley T066 Arbroath T026, T051, T229 Ardgay T239 Ardlui T227 Ardrossan Harbour T221 Ardrossan South Beach T221
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester Sub-Regional Assessment Appendix B – Supporting Information “Living Document” June 2008 Association of Greater Manchester Authorities SFRA – Sub-Regional Assessment Revision Schedule Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester June 2008 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August 2007 DRAFT Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 02 December DRAFT FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales 2007 Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 03 June 2008 FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Anita Longworth Alan Houghton Principal Planner Head of Planning North West Scott Wilson St James's Buildings, Oxford Street, Manchester, This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's M1 6EF, appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson United Kingdom accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, Tel: +44 (0)161 236 8655 or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • MOSSLEY STALYBRIDGE Broadbottom Hollingworth
    Tameside.qxp_Tameside 08/07/2019 12:00 Page 1 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ST MA A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lydgate 0 D GI RY'S R S S D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A BB RIV K T O E L 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 8 9 SY C R C KES L A O 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 E 8 8 . N Y LAN IT L E E C 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 L 3 3 RN M . HO K R MANCHESTE Hollins 404T000 D R ROAD The Rough 404000 P A A E O Dacres O N HOLM R FIRTH ROAD R A T L E E R D D ANE L N L I KIL O BAN LD O N K O S LAN A A E H R Waterside D - L I E E Slate - Z V T L E D I I L A R R A E Pit Moss F O W R W D U S Y E N E L R D C S A E S D Dove Stone R O Reservoir L M A N E D Q OA R R U E I T C S K E H R C Saddleworth O IN N SPR G A V A A M Moor D M L D I E L A L Quick V O D I R E R Roaches E W I Lower Hollins Plantation E V V I G E R D D E K S C D I N T T U A Q C C L I I R NE R R O A L L Greave T O E T E TAK Dove Stone E M S IN S S I I Quick Edge R Moss D D O A LOWER HEY LA.
    [Show full text]