DOCSLIB.ORG

Irrigation Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Irrigation Project IRRIGATION PROJECT Location The Project includes 21 subprojects in 9 counties – Dubrovnik-Neretva, Zadar, Istria, Međimurje, Virovitica-Podravina, Osijek-Baranja, Vukovar- Srijem, Brod-Posavina and Požega-Slavonia. Investment details Total Investment estimate: 192 million EUR (50 million EUR of possible EBRD investment) Project description The Project is an integral part of implementation of the national (state) strategic plan for irrigation of agricultural surfaces aimed primarily at creating conditions for optimal use of natural resources, i.e. soil and water through rational planning, construction and utilization of irrigation systems. The implementation of the national strategic plan started in 2005, with the preparation of county irrigation plans and development of technical documentation for national irrigation pilot projects and individual irrigation systems. The Project includes construction of 21 irrigation subprojects on approximately 25 000 ha, which would increase the total area under organized irrigation from the present about 15,000 ha to about 40,000 ha. The subprojects' end users are registered agricultural producers, i.e. legal persons (companies), family farms and associations. Construction Scope of Title/Name of the Location of value of the the Available technical documents for Available permits for Subproject of the the Subproject Subproject the Subproject the Subproject Irrigation Project Subproject (million (ha) EUR) Irrigation Study and Conceptual National Irrigation Pilot Design approx. Project Lower Neretva - 31.50 Preliminary Design 2900 Subsystem Opuzen Environmental Impact Assessment Study Irrigation Study and Conceptual Dubrovnik- National Irrigation Pilot Design Neretva Project Lower Neretva - approx. Preliminary Design County 7.10 Subsystem Koševo - 812 Environmental Impact Assessment Vrbovci Study Prefeasibility Study Preliminary Design approx. Irrigation System Glog 3.80 Environmental Impact Assessment 390 Study Irrigation System approx. Conceptual Design 5.50 Bokanjac-Rašinovac Zadar 475 Irrigation System County approx. 13.70 Vransko polje 2200 Preliminary Design Irrigation System approx. Environmental Impact Assessment 8.90 Poreština - I. Phase 605 Study Istrian Prefeasibility Study County Preliminary Design Irrigation System approx. 10.50 Environmental Impact Assessment Bujiština - I. Phase 550 Study Irrigation System Međimurje approx. 15.10 Prelog-Donji Kraljevec County 2500 Preliminary Design Main Design Irrigation System approx. Location Permit Virovitica- 8.20 Working Design Kapinci-Vaška 1260 Construction Permit Podravina Environmental Management Plan County Feasibility Study Irrigation System approx. Preliminary Design 4.10 Novi Gradac-Detkovac 810 Prefeasibility Study Preliminary Design of the Canal Main Design of the Canal Location Permit Irrigation System Baranja – Preliminary Design of the System for the Canal Lateral Canal Zmajevac - approx. Feasibility Study 12.30 Construction Permit Kneževi Vinogradi + 6036 Environmental Management Plan for the Canal Irrigation System Osijek- Need Assessment Study for Baranja Environmental Impact Assessment County Study Irrigation System of the approx. Preliminary Design Institute of Agriculture 0.80 210 Prefeasibility Study Osijek Irrigation System approx. Conceptual Design 13.70 Karašica - I. Phase 4050 Preliminary Design Irrigation System of the Main Design Location Permit Secondary School of approx. 52 1.00 Working Design Construction Permit Forestry Vinkovci Vukovar- Environmental Management Plan Feasibility Study Srijem County approx. Preliminary Design Irrigation System Sopot 3.10 737 Prefeasibility Study approx. Preliminary Design Irrigation System Kajiševac 1.60 320 Prefeasibility Study Brod- Conceptual Design Irrigation System approx. Posavina 2.70 Environmental Management Plan Location Permit Orubica - I. Phase 327 County Feasibility Study National Irrigation Pilot Vukovar- Conceptual Design Location Permit Project Biđ-Bosut Field – Srijem and Preliminary Design Provisional Supply Irrigation Canal Brod- - 40.00 Main Designs and Working Designs Construction Permit from Section II. to Section Posavina of the Section II. to Section VI. Construction Permit VI. Counties Feasibility Study for Sections I. and II. Preliminary Design Main Design Location Permit Irrigation System Kaptol approx. 70 0.40 Working Design Construction Permit Environmental Management Plan Požega- Feasibility Study Slavonia Irrigation System Preliminary Design County approx. Ramanovci-Bektež - I. 0.55 Main Design Location Permit 368 Phase Prefeasibility Study Irrigation System Orljava- approx. Conceptual Design 7.10 Londža 1929 Current Phase of the Project The Project is in different phases of implementation, depending on individual subprojects. Most subprojects are in phases of preparation of different technical documentation. Available Project Documentation Technical documentation developed for individual subprojects is available (conceptual designs, preliminary designs, main designs, working designs, feasibility studies, environmental impact assessment studies, etc. ). Location and construction permits are obtained for individual subprojects. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vegetation FORESTS
    CROATIA Climate and vegetation Geographic position of Croatia- Central European-mediterranean country Basic information about Croatia The land area 56594 km2 The teriritorial waters 31.067 km2 Lenght of coast 1777 km Number of islands, islets and reefs 1185 The highest point above the sea level 1831 m Number of countys 21 Number of cities and municiplalities 127 - 429 Population 4.290.612 Population on km2 78,1 Number of inhabited islands 48 Language Croatian Script Latin Political system Parliamentary democracy GDP per capita in 2012 10203 Breaking up Croatia into Counties Natural-geographic areas of Croatia Panonian-peripanonian region(includes 55% of the territory and 66% of the population) Mediterranean or Croatian coastal region(includes 31% of the territory and 31% of the population) Mountainous or Dinaric region (includes 14% of the territory and 3% of the population) Climate Climactic characteristics of Croatia are a result of its location in the mid-latitude, the influence of the Mediterranean and Atlantic seas as well as the shape and relief (mountains along the coast and Panonian plain). - moderate continental climate - Mediterranean climate - mountainous climate Vegetation FORESTS (climazonal vegetation) Mediterannean region covers approximately 40% of Croatia’s surface, here we find 17 forest communities; Eurosiberian-North American region covers about 60% of Croatia’s surface, where there are 45 forest communities. NON-FOREST VEGETATION Created by human activity – lawns, meadows, pastures, underbrush Spatial distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Land Use Analyses
    The relevance of farming and farmland for maintaining the landscape and biodiversity of the Sava floodplains Final report of Task C of the Life 3 rd countries project Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplains Wageningen International December 2009 WageningenInternational The relevance of farming and farmland for maintaining the landscape and biodiversity of the Sava floodplains Final report of Task C of the Life 3 rd Countries Program Protection of Biodiversity of the Sava River Basin Floodplain (LIFE06 TCY INT 246 ) The following report is based on the reports of the Land Use Working Group The editors of the three country reports are: Croatia- Ivana Ilijas, Jasna Jeremic, Andreja Ribaric State Institute for Nature Protection of Croatia Serbia- Alen Kis, Laslo Galambos, Dejan Bakovic, Klara Szabados and Milos Vukelic; Institute for Nature Conservation Serbia Bosnia and Herzegovia- Tihomir Predic- Agricultural Institute Banja Luka ABSTRACT Author(s) Zingstra, Henk ( final edit), Alen Kis, Andreja Ribaric, Dejan Bakovic, Ivana Ilijas, Jasna Jeremic, Laslo Galambos, Klara Szabados, Milos Vukelic, Tihomir Predic ; The relevance of farmland and farming for the protection of the landscape and biodiversity of the Sava Floodplains, Final Report of Task C of the EU-LIFE06 TCY INT 246 Project. Photos: Institute for Nature Conservation of Croatia, Agricultural Institute Banja Luka. Keywords: Land use, agriculture, agri environment, flood protection, nature conservation. © 2009 Wageningen International P.O. Box 88; 6700 AB Wageningen; The Netherlands No part of this publication may be reproduced or published in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system without the written permission of Wageningen International.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia. 'Virovitica on Cadastral Maps'
    CO-295 VIROVITICA ON CADASTRAL MAPS KICINBACI S. State geodetic administration, VIROVITICA, CROATIA Virovitica is a town in northern Croatia with a population of 15,000. The town is situated in the valley of the Drava river, in the southern part of the Pannonian Basin. The year 1234, when Virovitica was made a free trade town, is regarded the town’s founding year. The regular form of Virovitica indicates that the town was founded on a crossroads of two important traffic routes. The first route runs from the West to the East parallel with the Drava river, which is a tributary to the Danube; the second route runs from the North to the South. Being situated near the Hungarian border Virovitica also has a Hungarian name – Veröcé, which means “a small door”, a name that reminds of that there is a passage there from the Drava river valley to the Sava river valley through the Bilogora mountainous range. Some of the wealthy landowners had made the maps of their own estates even before any systematic survey was done, but these maps are not dealt with in this paper. The subject matter here is the systematic surveys and maps that are the result of the surveys. My wish was to analyse our cartographic heritage and link it with modern technologies. THE 19th CENTURY The Virovitica Town Museum keeps some of the cadastral records from the time of Emperor Joseph II, when the survey of the 18th century locality of Virovitica was carried out. This preserved data does not contain any graphic supplements.
    [Show full text]
  • Sava River Position Paper Prepared by Euronatur Supported by Croatian Society for Bird and Nature Protection (HDZPP) and Birdlife Slovenia (DOPPS)
    Sava River Position Paper Prepared by EuroNatur Supported by Croatian Society for Bird and Nature Protection (HDZPP) and BirdLife Slovenia (DOPPS) Introduction EuroNatur has been dedicated to nature conservation and the sustainable use of natural resources in the Sava River Basin for the last 25 years. In our role as an official observer of the Sava Commission EuroNatur has been following the processes of the Commission and the ongoing development of the Sava River Basin Management Plan with attention. Hereby we would like to comment on some questions related to further infrastructural development and regulation of the Sava River, which are urgent and alarming from our point of view. Moreover, we are offering recommendations and suggestions regarding these issues. Comments on the focus of the Sava Commission (ISRBC) The International Sava River Basin Commission (ISRBC) has been established for the purpose of realization of the following goals: I. Establishment of an international regime of navigation on the Sava River II. Establishment of sustainable water management III. Undertaking of measures to prevent or limit hazards Although the second goal includes the availability of “water in sufficient quantity and of appropriate quality for the preservation, protection and improvement of aquatic eco-systems (including flora and fauna and eco-systems of natural ponds and wetlands)” no working group was implemented that is adequately dealing with such issues as the monitoring and protection of the Sava River and connected aquatic ecosystems. Most publications that were elaborated by the ISRBC so far miss a clear reference to biodiversity and nature conservation topics, but deal with navigation and water management issues.
    [Show full text]
  • DIKTAS Country Report
    Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System Country Report (Regional Aspect) - Croatia http://diktas.iwlearn.org Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System Contents HYDROGEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW 1. Introduction 1.1. Project task and role of WG1 1.2. General on karst – term, distribution. Importance 1.3. Histrical review of karst researches 2. Physiography and climate 2.1. Geographic position and boundaries 2.2. Vegetation and land cover 2.3. Rainfall regime 2.4. Air temperature 2.5. Other climate elements 3. Hydrology 3.1. Hydrographic network 3.2. Stream-flow regime 3.3. Controlling streamflow – dams and reservoirs 4. Geological pattern 4.1. Paleogeography of Dinaric region 4.2. Dinaric Carbonate Platform (External Dinarides) - litostratigraphic units 4.3. Tectonic 5. Geomorphology and karstification 5.1. Karstification process 5.2. Karstic features 5.2.1. Surface karstic features 5.2.2. Potholes and caves 6. Aquifer systems 6.1. Aquifers classification and distribution 7. Groundwater basins 7.1. Regional groundwater direction 7.2. Grounwater bodies ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC OVERVIEW 1. Administrative boundaries 2. Population and demography 3. Tourism 4. Land use 5. Sources of income 6. Agriculture 7. Roads 8. Industries 9. Mining sites 10. Solid waste disposal 11. Wastewater treatment Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System 12. Dams and Hydropower Plants 13. Protected areas 14. Karstic caves 15. Groundwater dependent ecosystems 16. Water use 17. Surface water quality LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND POLICY 1. Introduction 2. Updated report on legal, institutional and policy framework in Croatia 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for Regional Poverty Differences in Croatia: Exploring the Role of Disparities in Average Income and Inequality
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Accounting for regional poverty differences in Croatia: Exploring the role of disparities in average income and inequality Rubil, Ivica The Institute of Economics, Zagreb 16 January 2013 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43827/ MPRA Paper No. 43827, posted 16 Jan 2013 11:16 UTC ACCOUNTING FOR REGIONAL POVERTY DIFFERENCES IN CROATIA: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF DISPARITIES IN AVERAGE INCOME AND INEQUALITY Ivica Rubil The Institute of Economics, Zagreb January 2013 Abstract The prevalence of poverty in a given population is determined by both the level of average income and the shape of income distribution. Accordingly, the difference in poverty between two populations can be attributed to disparities in their average incomes and in the levels of income inequality. In this paper, we decompose the differences in relative poverty between each of the twenty-one Croatian counties and Croatia as a whole into the contributions of the mean income and income inequality, using the Household Budget Survey data for 2010. The decomposition framework that we utilize here is one usually applied for decompositions of intertemporal poverty changes, and is based on the concept of Shapley value from cooperative game theory. Poverty is measured by three conventional measures – the headcount ratio, the poverty gap, and the squared poverty gap – and robustness of the results to switching from one measure to another is discussed. The results of decompositions show that in most cases both the mean income and inequality differences contribute to poverty variation across the counties, relative to poverty in Croatia as a whole. When poverty is measured by the headcount ratio, the income contribution dominates the inequality contribution, while when we switch to the other two measures, which give more weight to poorer among the poor, the inequality contribution starts to dominate.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithisation of Sava-Drava-Danube Interfluve at the End of the 6600–6000 BC Period of Rapid Climate Change> a New Solutio
    Documenta Praehistorica XLIII (2016) Neolithisation of Sava-Drava-Danube interfluve at the end of the 6600–6000 BC period of Rapid Climate Change> a new solution to an old problem Katarina Botic´ Institute of Archaeology, Zagreb, CR [email protected] ABSTRACT – The idea of the Neolithisation of the Sava-Drava-Danube interfluve has undergone very little change since S. Dimitrijevi≤'s time. Despite their many shortcomings, new archaeological exca- vations and radiocarbon dates of Early Neolithic sites have provided us with new insight into the process of Neolihisation of this region. Using the recently published work by B. Weninger and L. Clare (Clare, Weninger 2010; Weninger et al. 2009; Weninger et al. 2014) as a starting point, the available radiocarbon and archaeological data are used to build up a time frame comparable to the wider region of Southeast Europe and climate conditions for specific period. The results fit the model of Neolithisation well (Weninger et al. 2014.9, Fig. 4), filling in the geographical gaps. IZVLE∞EK – Premise o neolitizaciji v medre≠ju Save, Drave in Donave se od ≠asa S. Dimitrijevi≤a niso veliko spremenile. Nova arheolo∏ka izkopavanja in radiokarbonski datumi zgodnjega neolitika so, kljub mnogim pomanjkljivostim, prinesli nove vpoglede v proces neolitizacije na tem obmo≠ju. Za os- novo pri interpretaciji smo uporabili nedavno objavljena dela B. Weningerja in L. Clarea (Clare, We- ninger 2010; Weninger et al. 2009; Weninger et al. 2014), dosegljive radiokarbonske datume in arheo- lo∏ke podatke pa smo uporabili za izdelavo ≠asovnega okvirja, ki je primerljiv s ∏ir∏im obmo≠jem ju- govzhodne Evrope in s klimatskimi pogoji za posamezna obdobja.
    [Show full text]
  • Obstacles to Cross-Border Cooperation – Case of Croatia and Hungary
    European Journal of Geography Volume 9, Number 2: 116-133, June 2018 ©Association of European Geographers OBSTACLES TO CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION – CASE OF CROATIA AND HUNGARY Sanja TIŠMA Institute for Development and International Relations, IRMO, Zagreb, Croatia [email protected] Krešimir JURLIN Institute for Development and International Relations, IRMO, Zagreb, Croatia [email protected] Helena ČERMAK Institute for Development and International Relations, IRMO, Zagreb, Croatia [email protected] Abstract The focus of this paper is to identify most significant obstacles that hinder bilateral trade between Hungary and Croatia and propose solutions for improvements by using the gravity models, precisely the Newtonian model of gravitation. The results of the research show that in spite of interest for cross-border cooperation being expressed by the stakeholders from both sides of the border, Somogy County and Virovitica-Podravina County belong to less developed, deprived rural areas of Hungary and Croatia. The key weaknesses for cross-border cooperation include lack of transport connections and language barrier, while strengths reflect in entrepreneurial spirit and opportunity to apply and implement joint entrepreneurial projects financed by the European Union (EU) funds. Keywords: Cross-border cooperation, Croatia and Hungary, gravity models, entrepreneurship, transport infrastructure, EU funds 1. INTRODUCTION When considering bilateral trade, often the crucial question is what trade intensity shall be considered as appropriate or "normal". It has been known since the work of Tinbergen (1962) and Poyhonen (1963) that the size of bilateral trade flows between any two countries can be approximated by a law called the gravity equation which originates from the Newtonian theory of gravitation.
    [Show full text]
  • AMAZON of EUROPE BIKE TRAIL Output 3.1 Socio-Economic Analysis of Tourism Potentials
    AMAZON OF EUROPE BIKE TRAIL Output 3.1 Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) DTP2-002-2.2 AOE BIKE TRAIL Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Project AoE Bike Trail, DTP2-002-2.2 Work package: WP3: Product development Output Output 3.1 Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials Authors Anja Krajnik, Urška Dolinar, Tatjana Marn Institution Iskriva, Institute for Development of Local Potentials Date April 2019 Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Acknowledgment We would like to thank all participants who actively contributed with their inputs and comments during preparation of the Socio-economic analysis of tourism potentials of the Amazon of Europe area: Municipality of Velika Polana (Damijan Jaklin, Nina Lebar) WWF Austria (Stefanie Edelmüller, Arno Mohl) Trail Angels (Günter Mussnig, Rudi Trinko) Tourism Association Bad Radkersburg (Belinda Schagerl-Poandl, Christian Contola) Tourism Board Međimurje (Petra Murković, Iva Vurušić Mađarić, Rudi Grula) Public instituton for nature protection of Virovitca-Podravina County (Tatjana Arnold Sabo, Sabina Hranic, Antun Damjan) Public Institution County Development Agency of Osijek-Baranja County (Adela Sadiković, Ivana Kišćinal) Koprivnica Križevci County (Vladimir Šadek, Emilija Cvelber, Snježana Babok Grgić) WWF Adria (Ivana Korn Varga, Ana Kuzmanić, Lana Jurić) West-Pannon RDA Ltd. (Ádám Bolyós, Máté Deák, Tibor Polgár, Bejczy Delinke) Balaton-felvidéki Natonal Park Directorate (Csaba
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Inland Fishing in Member Countries of the European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission (EIFAC)
    Commercial inland fishing in member countries of the European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission (EIFAC): Operational environments, property rights regimes and socio-economic indicators Country Profiles May 2010 Mitchell, M., Vanberg, J. & Sipponen, M. EIFAC Ad Hoc Working Party on Socio-Economic Aspects of Inland Fisheries The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. All rights reserved. FAO encourages the reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy. © FAO 2012 All papers have been reproduced as submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    work in progress for public discussion Public Disclosure Authorized Water Resources Management in South Eastern Public Disclosure Authorized Europe Volume II Country Water Notes and Public Disclosure Authorized Water Fact Sheets Environmentally and Socially Public Disclosure Authorized Sustainable Development Department Europe and Central Asia Region 2003 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433, USA Manufactured in the United States of America First Printing April 2003 This publication is in two volumes: (a) Volume 1—Water Resources Management in South Eastern Europe: Issues and Directions; and (b) the present Volume 2— Country Water Notes and Water Fact Sheets. The Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development (ECSSD) Department is distributing this report to disseminate findings of work-in-progress and to encourage debate, feedback and exchange of ideas on important issues in the South Eastern Europe region. The report carries the names of the authors and should be used and cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations and conclusions are the authors’ own and should not be attributed to the World Bank, its Board of Directors, its management, or any member countries. For submission of comments and suggestions, and additional information, including copies of this report, please contact Ms. Rita Cestti at: 1818 H Street N.W. Washington, DC 20433, USA Email: [email protected] Tel: (1-202) 473-3473 Fax: (1-202) 614-0698 Printed on Recycled Paper Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Session 4 SRB Assessment
    Status of transboundary waters in South Eastern Europe Characterization Report on the Sava River Basin Dejan Komatina, Ph.D. Civ. Eng., Secretary, ISRBC General description of the basin • The Sava River Basin as a Danube sub-basin – Basin area: 95 720 km 2 (the second largest, after the Tisza basin) – Average flow (at the mouth): 1722 m 3/s (the largest tributary) – River length: 940 km (586 km of which were navigable before the war) Country Share of the Share of the basin (%) territory (%) Albania 0.1 0.5 Bosnia & Herzegovina 40 76 Croatia 26 45 Montenegro 7.5 52 Serbia 15.4 17 Slovenia 11 53 Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 2 Overview (location) of the SRB Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 3 Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 4 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 5 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 6 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 7 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 8 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 9 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 10 Land cover/land use in the SRB Land class % Artificial surfaces 2,23 Agricultural areas 42,36 Forests and semi natural areas 54,71 Wetland 0,08 Inland water 0,63 Int.
    [Show full text]