DOCSLIB.ORG

Wisconsin Bowhunter Wildlife Survey 2005 by Jessica Kitchell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wisconsin Bowhunter Wildlife Survey 2005 by Jessica Kitchell Wisconsin Bowhunter Wildlife Survey 2005 By Jessica Kitchell Abstract The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) in conjunction with the Wisconsin Trappers Association (WTA) and the Wisconsin Bowhunters Association (WBA) surveyed members of the WBA to help track mammalian and avian wildlife populations. Methods A survey was included in the 1997-2005 fall issues of The Bowhunter (official publication of the WBA) for bowhunters to remove and record the animals seen during their hunting trips. At the completion of the 2005 archery season, hunters were asked to return the completed survey to the WDNR, by tri-folding the survey with the postage paid side visible, and dropping it in the mailbox. No return postage was necessary. Results Wisconsin bowhunters sent back 97 Bowhunter Wildlife surveys after the completion of the 2005 archery season. This was lower than in 2004 when 102 hunters returned surveys. These 97 bowhunters averaged 20.5 trips into the field during the archery season. The average total hours hunted during the season was 65.6. The average time spent hunting during a single day was 3.2 hours. This is in comparison to the 2004 season where hunters averaged 21.7 trips, 72.5 hours hunted during the season, and 3.4 hours per day. During both years, most trips were taken in the month of October, followed by November, September, December, and January. Not surprisingly, the animal most frequently sighted while hunting was deer (Table 1). Hunters reported sighting an average of 42.9 deer per season and 2.1 deer per trip. This is in comparison to the 2004 season where hunters averaged seeing 47.8 deer per season and 2.2 deer per trip. Although the survey does not ask questions about harvest, it is possible that a change in hunter effort due to harvest success could cause a change in survey response from year to year. The next most frequently sighted animal was wild turkey. Archers averaged seeing 1.2 turkeys per trip; compared to 1.3 per trip in 2004. Ruffed grouse and raccoon followed turkeys as some of the more frequently seen wildlife. The least frequently sighted animals were the American marten, badger, otter, bobcat, skunk, fisher, and porcupine. Hunters were also asked to report animals they saw that were not listed on the survey form. Some of the more unusual reports were sightings of snowshoe hare, falcon, eagle, merlin, flying squirrel, and snow geese. Some of the most frequently reported species were squirrel, pheasant, owl, opossum, and cottontail rabbit. The data collected from this survey will be used by the WDNR in estimating distribution and abundance of Wisconsin's wildlife. Table 1. Total number of animals seen during the 2005 archery season by deer management region (number seen per 1,000 hours hunted). Region Species Central Eastern Northern Southern Western Statewide Forest Farmland Forest Farmland Farmland American Marten -- -- -- -- -- -- Badger -- -- 1(0.8) -- -- 1 (0.2) Black Bear -- 1 (0.6) 33 (25.7) -- -- 34 (5.3) Bobcat -- -- 4 (3.1) -- -- 4 (0.6) Coyote 2 (6.6) 12 (7.6) 14 (10.9) 45 (17.5) 1 (1.8) 74 (11.6) Fisher -- -- 12 (9.4) -- 3 (5.4) 15 (2.4) Fox (Red & Gray) -- 6 (3.9) 4 (3.7) 66 (25.7) 4 (8.4) 821 (12.9) Gray Wolf 7 (23.1) 2 (1.3) 7 (5.5) -- 6 (10.7) 22 (3.5) House Cat -- 31 (19.7) -- 41 (15.9) 6 (10.7) 78 (12.3) Porcupine 5 (16.5) 3 (1.9) 11 (8.6) -- -- 19 (3.0) Raccoon 2 (6.6) 26 (16.5) 8 (6.2) 144 (55.9) 2 (3.6) 182 (28.6) River Otter -- -- 1 (0.8) -- -- 1 (0.2) Ruffed Grouse 11 (36.3) 23 (14.6) 132 (103.0) 12 (4.7) 15 (26.8) 193 (30.3) Skunk -- -- 2 (1.6) 3 (1.2) 4 (7.2) 9 (1.4) White-tailed Deer 146 (0.5)2 1,226 (0.8)2 624 (0.5)2 1,608 (0.6)2 526 (0.9)2 4,1573 (0.7)2 Wild Turkey 189 (624.2) 835 (531.0) 155 (120.9) 1,089 (422.9) 159 (284.3) 2,4304 (381.7) 1 2 sightings from unknown region. 2 Expressed as deer seen per hour. 3 27 sightings from unknown region. 4 3 sightings from unknown region. 79 78 1M 3 1 2 7 4 6 28 9 34 8 35 13 14 29A 29B 11 12 36 10 39 40 Northern Forest 50 17 31 15 20 30 37 38 19 18 41 16 45 25 22 81 52 44 24 32 21 23 42 43 49B 49A 51A 26 82 22A 23A 52A 80C 80A 33 60M 60B Western 46 48 51B 27 57D Farmland 47 59B 59A 58 57 60A Eastern Farmland 57A 62B 63B 57B 62A 80B 63A 64M 57C 61 59C 55 Central 65A 65B Forest 64 56 53 66 61B 61A MCC W 59D 54A 72 67B 67A 59M 54B 68A 72A 54C 69 54B- 70E- 74A CWD CWD 68B 69C 71- Southern Farmland 70B- 70G- CWD 70- CWD CWD CWD 74B 76- 77D CWD 77M 70A- 76A- 77C 73E- CWD 76M- CWD CWD 73D CWD 73A 70C-CWD 75C- 77C- 73B- CWD CWD CWD 73B 75B-CWD 77B- 75D- 77A- 75A- CWD CWD CWD CWD Figure 1. Wisconsin deer management regions..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CANAAN VALLEY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE April 2007
    AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT HUNT PROGRAM PROPOSAL CANAAN VALLEY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE April 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Canaan Valley National Wildlife Refuge Tucker County, West Virginia ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/HUNTING CANAAN VALLEY NWR TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES/TABLES ....................................................................................................... vi LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ vii I. Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 II. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action .........................................................................5 A. Proposed Action.......................................................................................................5 B. Purpose.....................................................................................................................5 C. Need for the Proposed Action..................................................................................6 III. Proposed Action and Its Alternatives ..................................................................................6 A. Summary of the Alternatives ...................................................................................7 B. Alternatives Dismissed from Consideration............................................................7 C. Description of Alternatives......................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • North American Game Birds Or Animals
    North American Game Birds & Game Animals LARGE GAME Bear: Black Bear, Brown Bear, Grizzly Bear, Polar Bear Goat: bezoar goat, ibex, mountain goat, Rocky Mountain goat Bison, Wood Bison Moose, including Shiras Moose Caribou: Barren Ground Caribou, Dolphin Caribou, Union Caribou, Muskox Woodland Caribou Pronghorn Mountain Lion Sheep: Barbary Sheep, Bighorn Deer: Axis Deer, Black-tailed Deer, Sheep, California Bighorn Sheep, Chital, Columbian Black-tailed Deer, Dall’s Sheep, Desert Bighorn Mule Deer, White-tailed Deer Sheep, Lanai Mouflon Sheep, Nelson Bighorn Sheep, Rocky Elk: Rocky Mountain Elk, Tule Elk Mountain Bighorn Sheep, Stone Sheep, Thinhorn Mountain Sheep Gemsbok SMALL GAME Armadillo Marmot, including Alaska marmot, groundhog, hoary marmot, Badger woodchuck Beaver Marten, including American marten and pine marten Bobcat Mink North American Civet Cat/Ring- tailed Cat, Spotted Skunk Mole Coyote Mouse Ferret, feral ferret Muskrat Fisher Nutria Fox: arctic fox, gray fox, red fox, swift Opossum fox Pig: feral swine, javelina, wild boar, Lynx wild hogs, wild pigs Pika Skunk, including Striped Skunk Porcupine and Spotted Skunk Prairie Dog: Black-tailed Prairie Squirrel: Abert’s Squirrel, Black Dogs, Gunnison’s Prairie Dogs, Squirrel, Columbian Ground White-tailed Prairie Dogs Squirrel, Gray Squirrel, Flying Squirrel, Fox Squirrel, Ground Rabbit & Hare: Arctic Hare, Black- Squirrel, Pine Squirrel, Red Squirrel, tailed Jackrabbit, Cottontail Rabbit, Richardson’s Ground Squirrel, Tree Belgian Hare, European
    [Show full text]
  • Native & Naturalized Shoreland Plantings for New Hampshire
    Native Shoreland/Riparian Buffer Plantings for New Hampshire* * This list is referenced in Env-Wq 1400 Shoreland Protection as Appendix D Common Growth Light Soil Associated Birds and Mammals Latin Name Height Rooting Habitat Name(s) Rate Preference Preference (Cover, Nesting or Food) and Food Value Trees American Basswood Rich woods, valleys, Wildlife: Pileated woodpecker, wood duck, Medium-Large Full/Part Shade (American Linden) Tilia americana Moderate Deep Moist gentle slopes other birds; deer, rabbit, squirrel 60-100’ or Full Sun Food: Seeds, twigs Wildlife: Blue jay, chickadees, nuthatches, quail, ruffed grouse, tufted titmouse, wild Fagus Medium-Large Full/Part Shade Rich woods, turkey, wood duck, woodpeckers; bear, American Beech Slow Shallow Dry or Moist grandifolia 60-90’ or Full Sun well-drained lowlands chipmunk, deer, fox, porcupine, snowshoe hare, squirrel Food: Nuts, buds, sap Wildlife: Downy woodpecker, mockingbird, American purple finch, ring-necked pheasant, rose- Ostrya Small Full/Part Shade Hophornbeam Slow Shallow Dry or Moist Rich woods breasted grosbeak, ruffed grouse, wild turkey, virginiana 20-40’ or Full Sun wood quail; deer, rabbit, squirrel (Ironwood) Food: Nuts, buds, seeds Rich woods, forested Wildlife: Quail, ruffed grouse, wood duck; American Hornbeam Carpinus Small/Shrubby Full/Part Shade Dry, Moist, Flood (Blue Slow Moderate wetlands, ravines, beaver, deer, squirrel caroliniana 20-40’ or Full Sun Tolerant Beech/Musclewood) streambanks Food: Seeds, buds Wildlife: Bluebird, brown thrasher, catbird, American
    [Show full text]
  • Demography of Snowshoe Hare Cycles in Canada's Boreal Forest
    © 2020 The Authors. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the Ecological Society of America. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. DEMOGRAPHY OF SNOWSHOE HARE CYCLES IN CANADA’S BOREAL FOREST Madan K. Oli , Charles J. Krebs, Alice J. Kenney, Rudy Boonstra, Stan Boutin, and James E. Hines Study Description For 45 yr in the undisturbed ecosystem of the Kluane boreal forest (Yukon, Canada) we have carried out mark–recapture studies on snowshoe hares in spring and fall to determine the mechanisms behind their classic 9–10- yr pop- ulation cycles. Experimental manipulations of food, predators, and stress have shown that predation is the dominant mechanism behind these cycles, and that predators reduce hare reproduction by chronic stress associated with predator chases. Our attention has now turned to behavioral ecology of predator–preda- tor and predator–hare interactions and the physiology and neurobiology of stress in female hares in a boreal forest affected by rapid climate change. Oli, M. K., C. J. Krebs, A. J. Kenney, R. Boonstra, S. Boutin, and J. E Hines. 2020. Demography of Snowshoe Hare Cycles in Canada’s Boreal Forest. Bull Ecol Soc Am 101(2):e01678. https ://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1678 Article e01678 Photo Gallery April 2020 1 Photo Gallery Photo 1. Coyote (Canis latrans). Coyotes are one of the major predators of snowshoe hares in the Yukon boreal forest.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HEAT IS on Species Feeling the Effects of Climate Change
    THE HEAT IS ON Species feeling the effects of climate change Snowshoe Hare Lepus americanus USFS Region: ABOUT THIS SPECIES Northern United States Snowshoe hares are the primary northern rabbit species, ranging throughout the boreal and Canada forests of Alaska and Canada and into the northern and mountainous regions of the Lower 48. They eat grasses, clover and the twigs and branches of maple, pine, willows Area affected: and other trees and shrubs. The young are born with a full coat of brown fur and are Northern forests capable of hopping and feeding on their own almost immediately. Their main habitat Climatic change: requirement is lots of dense undergrowth for feeding and cover from predators, which Shorter snow season include coyotes, bobcats, foxes, lynx, raptors and owls. They also rely on camouflage for protection from predators. Depending on the season their coats are either brown to Impact: blend in with the bare ground or white for camouflage against the snow. Phenologic mismatch DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT The snowshoe hare is a poster child for “phenological mismatch,” a phenomenon that occurs when the timing of important events in nature is not in sync. For the hare these events are day length and season. The hares change coat color in response to a release of hormones triggered by changes in seasonal daylight, which historically reliably correlated to the onset of snow cover in the fall and snow melt in the spring. Now temperatures are shortening the snowy season on both ends, while the day-length cycle that triggers color change remains the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Carnivore Research in the Northern Cascades of Oregon (Oct 2012–May 2013, Oct 2013–Jun 2014)
    Final Progress Report Forest Carnivore Research in the Northern Cascades of Oregon (Oct 2012–May 2013, Oct 2013–Jun 2014) 2 July 2014 Jamie E. McFadden-Hiller1,2, Oregon Wildlife, 1122 NE 122nd, Suite 1148, Portland, OR 97230, USA Tim L. Hiller1,3, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Wildlife Division, 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE, Salem, OR 97302, USA One of several red foxes detected in the northern Cascades of Oregon. Suggested citation: McFadden-Hiller, J. E., and T. L. Hiller. 2014. Forest carnivore research in the northern Cascades of Oregon, final progress report (Oct 2012–May 2013, Oct 2013–Jun 2014). Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Salem, Oregon, USA. 1 Current address: Mississippi State University, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS 39762-9690, USA 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] Oregon Cascades Forest Carnivore Research, Final Progress Report, Jun 2014 2 Habitat for American marten (Martes americana)4 typically includes late successional coniferous and mixed forests with >30% canopy cover (see Clark et al. 1987, Strickland and Douglas 1987). The Pacific Northwest has experienced intensive logging during the past century and the distribution of martens in this region is largely discontinuous because of fragmented patches of forest cover (Gibilisco 1994). Based on state agency harvest data, the average annual number of martens harvested in the Oregon Cascades (and statewide) has decreased substantially during recent decades, but disentangling the potential factors (e.g., decreasing abundance, decreasing harvest effort) attributed to changes in harvest levels continues to prove difficult (Hiller 2011, Hiller et al.
    [Show full text]
  • JACKRABBITS and OTHER HARES James E
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The aH ndbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for Damage 1-1-1994 JACKRABBITS AND OTHER HARES James E. Knight Extension Wildlife Specialist, Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717 Knight, James E., "JACKRABBITS AND OTHER HARES" (1994). The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage. Paper 54. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook/54 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The aH ndbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. James E. Knight Extension Wildlife Specialist Animal and Range Sciences JACKRABBITS AND Montana State University Bozeman, Montana 59717 OTHER HARES Fig. 1. Blacktail jackrabbit, Lepus californicus (left); whitetail jackrabbits, L. townsendii (middle); showshoe hare, L. americanus (right). Damage Prevention and Frightening Trapping Control Methods Guard dogs. Body-gripping and leghold traps. Repellents Box traps. Exclusion Ammonium soaps, capsaicin, naphtha- Shooting Fencing. lene, thiram, tobacco dust, ziram. Spotlighting and day shooting are Tree trunk guards. Toxicants effective where legal. Cultural Methods Anticoagulants (where registered). Hunting. Manipulation of habitat. Fumigants Other Methods Planting of less desirable crops. None are registered. Predators. PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF WILDLIFE DAMAGE — 1994 Cooperative Extension Division Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Nebraska - Lincoln United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Damage Control D-81 Great Plains Agricultural Council Wildlife Committee a b c Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter W-3 - Furbearers and Small Game, Except Migratory Birds
    09/01/2021 CHAPTER W-3 - FURBEARERS AND SMALL GAME, EXCEPT MIGRATORY BIRDS Index Page ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS #300 Definitions 1 #301 License Fees 1 #302 Hours 2 #303 Manner of Take 2 #304 License Requirements 5 #305 Evidence of Sex/Species 5 ARTICLE II SMALL GAME SEASON DATES, UNITS (AS DESCRIBED IN CHAPTER O OF THESE REGULATIONS), BAG AND POSSESSION LIMITS, LIMITED LICENSES AND PERMITS #306 Cottontail Rabbit, Snowshoe Hare, White-tailed & Black-tailed 6 jackrabbit #307 Abert's Squirrels 6 #308 Fox Squirrel and Pine Squirrels 6 #309 Wyoming (Richardson's) ground squirrel, black-tailed, white-tailed, 6 and Gunnison prairie dogs #310 Common Snapping Turtle 7 #311 Marmot 7 #312 Prairie Rattlesnake 7 #313 Dusky (Blue) Grouse 7 #314 White-tailed Ptarmigan 7 #315 Greater Sage-grouse 8 #316 Gunnison Sage-grouse 8 #317 Mountain Sharp-tailed Grouse 8 #318 Chukar Partridge 9 #319 Pheasant 9 #320 Quail (Northern Bobwhite, Scaled, Gambel's) 9 #321 Greater Prairie-Chicken 9 #322 Wild Turkey 10 #322.5 Ranching for Wildlife - Turkey 17 #323 Mink, pine marten, badger, gray fox, red fox, swift fox, raccoon, 20 ring-tailed cat, striped skunk, western spotted skunk, long-tailed weasel, short-tailed weasel, opossum and muskrat #324 Bobcat 20 #325 Coyote 20 #326 Beaver 20 Basis and Purpose 22 Statement CHAPTER W-3 - FURBEARERS and SMALL GAME, EXCEPT MIGRATORY BIRDS ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS #300 - Definitions A. "Canada Lynx Recovery Area" means the area of the San Juan and Rio Grande National Forests and associated lands above 9,000 feet extending west from a north-south line passing through Del Norte and east from a north-south line passing through Dolores and from the New Mexico state line north to the Gunnison basin (including Taylor Park east to the Collegiate Range).
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Variation of Coyote Diet in Northwestern Wyoming: Implications for Dietary Overlap with Canada Lynx?
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Publications Plant Health Inspection Service 2012 Seasonal Variation of Coyote Diet in Northwestern Wyoming: Implications for Dietary Overlap with Canada Lynx? Jennifer L. B. Dowd Utah State University Eric M. Gese USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Dowd, Jennifer L. B. and Gese, Eric M., "Seasonal Variation of Coyote Diet in Northwestern Wyoming: Implications for Dietary Overlap with Canada Lynx?" (2012). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 1125. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/1125 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Jennifer L. B. Dowd, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 84322 and Eric M. Gese1, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 84322 Seasonal Variation of Coyote Diet in Northwestern Wyoming: Implications for Dietary Overlap with Canada Lynx? Abstract Exploitative competition through resource utilization may occur between coyotes (Canis latrans) and other carnivores. In the southern periphery of Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) range, there is concern that increased snowmobile activity may enable coyotes to increase their movements into deep snow areas during the winter months, thereby potentially creating heightened resource competition with lynx, mainly for the lynx’s main prey, snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Tour Trail Book 12.18.Qxp
    Mammal Tour on the Ridge Trail Enjoy a leisurely 1 mile hike on the Ridge Trail, while learning about our Northwoods mammals! A collaboration of the Cable Natural History Museum and the North End Ski Club, with metal mammals by Mark Blaskey. Can you find all of the metal animal silhouettes along the way? The Mission of the Cable Natural History Museum is: Connecting people to Northwoods nature through educational experiences that inspire wonder, discovery and responsibility. We connect YOU to the Northwoods! For more information, visit www.cablemuseum.org, or www.norwiski.com/northend. Special thanks to Ron Caple for inspiring this project! This program made possible by a grant from the Wisconsin Environmental Education Board and by generous donors like you! Illustrations by Katie Connolly and Diana Randolph Mammal Tour on the Ridge Trail American Badger . .2 Northern Short-tailed Shrew . .3 Red Fox . .4 Fisher . .5 North American Porcupine . .6 Snowshoe Hare . .7 Bobcat . .8 Meadow Vole . .9 North American River Otter . .10 Striped Skunk . .11 American Marten . .12 Coyote . .13 Long-tailed Weasel, Short-tailed Weasel, Least Weasel . .14 American Black Bear . .15 Animal Location Map . .16-17 Northern Raccoon . .18 Muskrat . .19 American Beaver . .20 Northern Flying Squirrel . .21 Eastern Gray Squirrel . .22 Woodland Deer Mouse . .23 White-tailed Deer . .24 Gray Wolf . .25 Eastern Chipmunk . .26 Little Brown Bat . .27 Woodchuck . .28 Glossary . .29 Mammal Tracking Guide . .30-31 1 American Badger Taxidea taxus Mustelidae: Weasel Family The American badger has a flat body with short legs, and a triangular shaped face with a long, pointed nose and small ears on the side of its head.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Snowmobile Trails on Coyote Movements Within Lynx Home Ranges
    Research Article The Effect of Snowmobile Trails on Coyote Movements Within Lynx Home Ranges JAY A. KOLBE,1 Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, Seeley Lake, MT 59868, USA JOHN R. SQUIRES, United States Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Box 8089, Missoula, MT 59807, USA DANIEL H. PLETSCHER, Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA LEONARD F. RUGGIERO, United States Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Box 8089, Missoula, MT 59807, USA ABSTRACT Coyotes (Canis latrans) and Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) are sympatric throughout much of the lynx’s southern range. Researchers and managers have suggested that the presence of compacted snowmobile trails may allow coyotes to access lynx habitat from which they were previously excluded by deep, unconsolidated snow. This could then allow coyotes to more effectively compete with lynx for snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), the lynx’s primary prey. We investigated how coyotes interacted with compacted snowmobile trails by conducting carnivore track surveys and by snow tracking adult coyotes (4 M, 8 F) in areas of western Montana, USA, with both documented lynx presence and recreational snowmobile use. Coyotes remained in lynx habitat having deep snow throughout the winter months. They used compacted snowmobile trails for 7.69% of their travel distance and traveled on them for a median distance of 124 m. Coyotes used compacted forest roads (5.66% of total travel) and uncompacted forest roads (4.62% of total travel) similarly. Coyotes did not travel closer to compacted snowmobile trails than random expectation (coyote x¯ distance from compacted trails ¼ 368 m, random expectation ¼ 339 m) and the distance they traveled from these trails did not vary with daily, monthly, or yearly changes in snow supportiveness or depth.
    [Show full text]
  • A Food Habits Study of the Snowshoe Hare, Lepus Americanus Washingtonii Baird, in Western Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF ALBERT MOZEJKO for the DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Name of student) (Degree) in Zoology presented on (Major) S:afte)/17/ Title: A FOOD HABITS STUDY OF THE SNOWSHOE HARE, Lepus americanus washingtonii BAIRD, IN WESTERN OREGON Abstract approved:Redacted for Privacy Dr. R. M. Storm A food habits study of the snowshoe hare, Lepus_ americanus washingtonii Baird, was conducted in_the western Cascades of Oregon during the period 1962-1965. Recognition of the damage caused by this hare to coniferous forest reproduction in Oregon and Washington was a factor substantiating the study.Major objective of the study was to complete a histological-microtechnique analysis of a fecal pellet collection to determine the annual food habits of this mammal in the area studied. The study area, located on cut-over forest land, was divided arbitrarily into three zones.This was to facilitate selection of pellets for final analysis and to determine if hares used thezones, each different, interchangeably during feeding activities. Fecal pellets were collected from hares live-trapped at monthly intervals.Observations upon numerous trap-released hares verified use of 15 different plant species as food items. Adult hares were individually caged and, in a predetermined manner, test fed plants from the study area.Hares ate some of each of 34 plant species offered and showed decided preferences based on consumption weights and percentages. An herbarium-type reference collection was prepared of 54 plant species from the study area. A permanent microscope slide reference collection representing 40 plant species was prepared.Slides of epidermal tissues from stems and adaxial and abaxial surfaces of leaves were stained with Bismarck brown Y.
    [Show full text]