DOCSLIB.ORG

Camberwell Conservation Study 1991 1944-45 and Miss B.E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Camberwell Conservation Study 1991 1944-45 and Miss B.E l Stickland In 1962 R Davis was the occupier of and Osaka (1970). In 1969 Boyd was awarded the this property and in January 1973 Arumugam Gold Medal of the Australian Institute of Eajendran, a civil engineer, and his wife, Maria, Architecture and thS following year became 1 became the owners/. president of the RAIA . Glen Iris builder and artist, John Murphy, was born Boyd's better known works include McCaughey in Melbourne in 1917 and became a builder Court at Melbourne University (a seven-storey flat immediately after the Second World War forming! block) and the Fletcher house at Brighton, both of 14 partnership with Frank Green for several years' . which he won citations for . Publications by Boyd Murphy was introduced to Robyn Boyd through include Victorian Modern 1947, Australia's Home Arthur Boyd, a close friend of Murphy's4. Other 1952, The Australian Ugliness 1960, The Walls houses built by Murphy include the other Boyd Around Us 1961, Kenzo Tange 1962, and The Puzzle house at Walsh Street, South Ya!'"a and Browne's of Architecture 196515. residence, Toorak Road, Malvern . Robyn Boyd married Dorothea Madder in 1941 and Robyn Boyd was born in 1919, the son of Penleigh had three children one of which, Penleigh, is an Boyd, a well-known painter and member of one of architect. He died in 197116 Australia's most distinguished families of artists6 Educated at Malvern Church of England Grammar Description School he served his articles with prominent The plans for the new painted brick-veneer house architects, A. & K. Henderson and Partners while were as simple as the house itself, ruled lines on studying architecture at Melbourne Technic~l blueprint. Hugging the only available ground College and the Atelier at Melbourne University . outside of the 30' easement and the creek channel, On return from service in World War II he passed the plan was necessarily long and thin with the R V.I.A. examinations and was admitted as an split-level dining/living flanked by a servery Associate in 1946. kitchen and compact bathroom, as the centre of the Boyd formed a partnership with Kevin Pethebridge first section to be built. Sensibly for sun orientation, and Frank Bell during 194547 and became a tutor bedroom was at the south end and, on the north, at Melbourne University8 In 1946 he became the was a verandah. As with the Mcintyre Orion Stneet inaugural director of The AgeSmall Homes Service house, the floor was to be partly brick paving over which was run by the RV.LA. in conjunction with concrete and most of the exposed ceiling straw-like TheAge9 Solomit, both contributing to the show of natural Leaving the Small Homes Service in 1953, Boyd materials in the dedicatedly no- nonsense joined architects Roy Grounds and Frederick architecture. Adding to these natural materials was Romberg in a partnership that continued until the display of polished copper which hovered as a 1962, when Roy Grounds left the partnership''. hood over the fireplace. During this time he designed many innovative The next addition (1951) placed another bedroom buildings throughout Australia, including the on the south end and at the north, replacing the Richardson house, Blackfriars Close, Toorak, the verandah, was a study/living area and master Foy house, Beaumaris and the Wilson house, Kew. bedroom connected via a glazed entrance hall. This Melbourne then was virtually the capital of presumably separated adults from children. Modem architecture in Australia, and Grounds, In 1958 Boyd applied to build a simple carport near Romberg and Boyd were the undoubted focuslI the front boundary. In 1965-67 Boyd was the Visiting Professor of The periodical Smudges described the house two Architecture at the Massachusetts Institute of years after completion as their House of the Year: I 2 Technology, U.S.A . He was the designer of the Australian displays at World Expo Montreal (1967) I BA 1958.22858; NTA EN. 5801 2 ibid.; D1962 3 NTA F.N. 580I 4 ibid. 5 ibid. 6 NTA F.N. 580I 7 ibid.; WWA 1968.p.iI3 8 NTA F.N. 5801 9 The Age, 12.11.l969,p.6 LO ibid.; WWA 1968.p.113 11 NTA F.N. 5801 12 ibid. 13 TheAge, 12.11.1969; The Age, 19. LO. 1970,p.2 14 TheAge,12.11.1%9 15 WWA 1968.p.113 16 lbid., HeraId16.10.1971. p.I CamberwelJ Conservation Study 1991 Areas ofthe small houseflow into each other. Differing External Integrity activities are separated but only rarely by a solid Generally original, given the above stages. partition. The resultant space is dynamic, its architectonic qualities limited by the designer's will. So Streelscape Contribution it is with the house. Areas merge, sometimes easily, sometimes dramatically. The effect is heightened by Unrelated to the streetscape. variation of colour, rexture (internal lining is, in part, Oregon, vertically)... Significance Architecturally, considered by Boyd's The description also notes cork tiles over the contemporaries as the prototype post-war Modem sla~ concrete in the living room (formerly confined house which took up new ideas ~bout spatial flow, to kitchens) , exposed face brick in some sections both inside and outside the building, reveling In and the unusual sloping east window wall which the minimalism required by the war's materials extended out nearly to the gutter line. Another conservation programme and the challenges p.osed article compared the plan as roughly the same as a by the near impossible site: of State and national railway train and showed pictures of the importance. suspended plywood ceiling beneath the gej't1y gabled Malthoid and white-gravel clad roofline . Historically, the first house designed f~r: and by, Australia's best known architectural critic, writer In 1975 a two storey wing was added to the south and post-war designer, Robin Boyd: of State and end but has little effect on the original house. national importance. The landscape to the east (on the easement) is mature and supportive of if not related to the house concept. House, 716 Riversdale Road, Camberwell Comparative Examples The following Camberwell sites may be compared with this site. 106,WHITEHORSE ROAn L«.W-l 1,MOt-.'TANASTREET, 1940 1.297, TOORAK ROAD, 194(1 91, ,\1AUD STREET,1940c 133,MAUD STREET, 1940(" 56, RIVERSIDEAVElvUE. 1940c 15,WALBUNDRYAVEl\:llE, 1940c 417·,WHITEHORSEROAD, 1940,. 113, YARRBAT AVEhl1E, 1940.. 123,MONT ALBERTROAD, 1941-2 2, BEATRICE STREET, 1941 6, BULLEfl','ROAD, 1941 171.DONCA.STERROAD, 1941 4, MAYSLA STREET, 1941 46,THE BOULEVARD, 1941 1, KELBA STREET,1941c 666, RIVERSDALE ROAD, 1946-7 StudyGrading: C 119, DONC.A.STER ROAD. 1948 1. KALONCA ROAD, 1948c Construction Date: 1937 166,ItVHITEHORSE ROAD, 1951-2 First Owner: Smith, Henry M law clerk 2, TAURUS STREET, 195Ic Builder: Bowen, M N 32 URSASTREET, 1951c 6, CARRIGALSTREET, 1952 43,KIREEPROAD, 1952 History 1,,\1ADD£NSTREET, 1952 2. G\RRIGAL STREET, 1954 M.N. Bowen, a builder, applied for a permit to 15,CARRICAL STREET, 1954 build a residence on this property in 1937'. Bowen 119,VVINMALEE ROAD, 1954 had been commissioned by Harry Melville Smith, a 14.ORION STREET, 1954c 3.2, BAL1-\ti1..' ROAD, 1955( law clerk, to construct a six roomed, brick an? 45A,.NARRAK ROAD, 19S5c timber dwelling at an estimated cost of £1,150 . Harry Smith resided here until the late 1940s In which time a section of the land became the Riversdale Tennis Courts (called the Kaydon 1 Smudges vol. 8, no, 53,1949 , 2 also in service areas with Semtext tiles in other rooms- no brick 3 Architecture &. The Arts 8,1954 p,28f 4 BA 1937,8547 5 ibid. Camberwell ConservationStudy 1991 Tennis Courts in 195<{ In 1950 Donald M. Berry 26, REID STREET, I938 660. Rn'ER5DALE ROAD, 1938 occupied the property . 66, THE BOULH:·...I<.D, 1938 130. H·HITEHORSE ROAD, 1938 Description H. CASC\0E 5TREET.l~39 24. CHRISrm".·ELSTREET-1939 A two storey Moderne style house clad with I, ,\-fOLL\'TAIX ,\'IEVVROAD, 1939 clinker brickwork and surrounded by landscape of .1,3, YUILLE STREET, 1939 43. CASC·WE STREET, 1939.-:' the period. Hipped-roof in form, the stair-hall provides contrasting parapelled element to the composition External Integrity with another, at a lower level, provided by an open Generally original. terrace over a front room, Window joinery is steel, with some timber, while balustrading is Streetscape Contribution ornamental wrought-iron, typical of the era. The fence is original. Typical of the large houses along Riversdale Road and part of the Camberwell Estate on the south. Comparative Examples Significance The following Camberwell sites may be compared with this site. Architecturallv, a good and intact example of the Modeme style, prominently sited on the perimeter 9, BOST01\' ROi\D, 1930 of and contributory to a contemporary estate: of 396, CAA1'BERltVELLROA.D, 1930 regional interest. 460, CA2"fBERVVELLROAD,1930 16, AlUS"h'ELL HILL 1930 Historically, evocative of the 3, BRENBE.A.L STREET, 1930, professional/managing classes associated with 177, DO?\,'CASTERROAD, 1930( 816-821, RlVERSDALE ROAD, 1930, Camberwell: of local importance. 4$-!, V'.i\RF1CdL RO.'iD, lil30, 359, I-VHlTEHORSE RO.'\D, 1930,· 397-399, V'v'HlTEHORSE ROi\D, Lil30t" House, 497, vVHJTEHORSE ROAD, 1930( 718 Riversdale Road, Camberwell 35, BAD\/"(!\' ROAD, 1931.2 1292 TOORAKROA,D, 1931-2 11.CH.'\TFlELD .A.VE1\'UE, 1932·3 1i, CHRISTOhH STREET, 1932 3, F!!\'SBURY RDA,D, 1932 7, ,HURlEL STREET, 1932( 4, m\:SBURYl·,,:>1.Y, 1933 125, HICHFfELD ROAD, 1933 1, J\1APU CRESCEXT, 1933 14, STODDART STREET, 1933 7. A1A.!\'GA.";STREET, 1933( 11, FA1R.J.HOl<T AVE0.'UE, 1934-5 87-87.1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House at 4 Cobby Street, Campbell
    Register of Significant Twentieth Century Architecture RSTCA No: R103 Name of Place: House at 4 Cobby Street Campbell Address/Location: 4 Cobby Street, CAMPBELL ACT Block 5 Section 40 of Listing Status: Other Heritage Listings: Date of Listing: Level of Significance: Citation Revision No: Category: Citation Revision Date: Style: Date of Design: Designer: Construction Period: Client/Owner/Lessee: Date of Additions: Builder: Statement of Significance The residence at 4 Cobby Street, Campbell, is an example of significant architecture and an educational resource. The house is a good example of the Post-War International Style. The design incorporated some of the principal design features which are peculiar to the style including cubiform overall shape and large sheets of glass. The residence also displays elements of the Post-War Melbourne Regional Style including widely projecting eaves and long unbroken roof line. The architecture of this building may contribute to the education of designers in their understanding of post-war architectural styles. Sir Otto Frankel was recognised internationally as Australia's pre-eminent Geneticist and was a member of the executive of the CSIRO. A significant part of his work after his retirement, which was considered to be his most productive time, was undertaken in the residence. The design of this as his own residence highlights the significance of this house for its association with him. Description The three bedroom residence was designed by Roy Grounds, with Theo Bischoff as the project architect, in 1969-70 for Sir Otto and Lady Frankel and construction was completed in 1970-71 1. The building is a late example of a combination of two styles: the Post-War Melbourne Regional Style (1940-60) with its widely projecting eaves (at the rear only) and long, unbroken roof line and; the Post War International Style (1940-60) with its cubiform overall shape and large sheets of glass 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists' Houses in Canberra 1950–1970
    EXPERIMENTS IN MODERN LIVING SCIENTISTS’ HOUSES IN CANBERRA 1950–1970 EXPERIMENTS IN MODERN LIVING SCIENTISTS’ HOUSES IN CANBERRA 1950–1970 MILTON CAMERON Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Cameron, Milton. Title: Experiments in modern living : scientists’ houses in Canberra, 1950 - 1970 / Milton Cameron. ISBN: 9781921862694 (pbk.) 9781921862700 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Scientists--Homes and haunts--Australian Capital Territority--Canberra. Architecture, Modern Architecture--Australian Capital Territority--Canberra. Canberra (A.C.T.)--Buildings, structures, etc Dewey Number: 720.99471 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by Sarah Evans. Front cover photograph of Fenner House by Ben Wrigley, 2012. Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press; revised August 2012 Contents Acknowledgments . vii Illustrations . xi Abbreviations . xv Introduction: Domestic Voyeurism . 1 1. Age of the Masters: Establishing a scientific and intellectual community in Canberra, 1946–1968 . 7 2 . Paradigm Shift: Boyd and the Fenner House . 43 3 . Promoting the New Paradigm: Seidler and the Zwar House . 77 4 . Form Follows Formula: Grounds, Boyd and the Philip House . 101 5 . Where Science Meets Art: Bischoff and the Gascoigne House . 131 6 . The Origins of Form: Grounds, Bischoff and the Frankel House . 161 Afterword: Before and After Science .
    [Show full text]
  • City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
    City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin Architectural and Historical Intensive Survey Report of Residential Properties Phase 2 By Rowan Davidson, Associate AIA & Jennifer L. Lehrke, AIA, NCARB Legacy Architecture, Inc. 605 Erie Avenue, Suite 101 Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081 Project Director Joseph R. DeRose, Survey & Registration Historian Wisconsin Historical Society Division of Historic Preservation – Public History 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Sponsoring Agency Wisconsin Historical Society Division of Historic Preservation – Public History 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 2019-2020 Acknowledgments This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to Office of the Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240. The activity that is the subject of this intensive survey report has been financed entirely with Federal Funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and administered by the Wisconsin Historical Society. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Grounds, Boyd and the Philip House
    4. Form Follows Formula: Grounds, Boyd and the Philip House Figure 4.1 Philip House, view from north-east Photograph: Ben Wrigley, 2011 John Philip was brought to Canberra as part of Frankel’s ambitious postwar recruitment program, and was appointed head of a new agricultural physics group at the CSIRO. Regarded as Australia’s leading environmental physicist, he was elected a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science in 1967. His wife, Frances (‘Fay’), was an accomplished artist who was related to the Boyds via the Mills and à Becketts, and had attended the Murrumbeena State School in Victoria with Mary and Arthur Boyd. Many of Frances’s portraits of Australia’s leading scientists and academics—including Sir Mark Oliphant, Doug Waterhouse, John Jaeger, William Rogers, Patrick Moran and Manning Clark—are held in the collections of the Australian Academy of Science and The Australian National University. The Philip House, at 42 Vasey Crescent, Campbell, is one of three adjacent houses by Grounds, Romberg and Boyd that are known collectively as the Vasey Crescent Group. The other two houses in the group are the Blakers House and the Griffing House. Grounds and Boyd were both involved with these houses. All three were designed by Grounds, who arranged initial briefings, recorded 101 Experiments in Modern Living the clients’ requirements and prepared sketches from late 1959 through to early 1960. Boyd met with the clients in January 1960, and took control of the houses from May of that year as Grounds prepared for a three-month overseas trip.1 The Philip House is important for two reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Styles/Types
    Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • RMIT Design ARCHIVES JOURNAL Vol 3 Nº 1 2013 RMIT Design ARCHIVES JOURNAL Vol 3 Nº 1 2013 Frederick Romberg: an Architectural Survey
    RMIT DesIgn ARCHIVES JOURnAL Vol 3 Nº 1 2013 RMIT DesIgn ARCHIVES JOURnAL Vol 3 Nº 1 2013 Frederick Romberg: an architectural survey Since its beginning the RMIT Design Archives has actively sought Guest Editor Journal Editor methods of engaging contemporary design practitioners in contributing Michael Spooner Harriet Edquist to its innovative approaches to collecting and research. The Romberg Collection, deposited in 2008, documents the practice Editorial Assistance Design of eminent Melbourne architect Frederick Romberg. It has been over Kaye Ashton Letterbox.net.au ten years since the first and last exposition on Romberg’s output was held at RMIT Gallery. That exhibition and subsequent publication, contact Frederick Romberg: The Architecture of Migration 1936–1975, continue [email protected] to serve as the most complete public record of his work to date.1 www.rmit.edu.au/designarchives Frederick Romberg: an architectural survey is a collaborative inter- issn 1838-9406 disciplinary project that has approached the Romberg Collection with Published by rmit Design Archives, rmit University the intention of examining not only his architectural output, but the Text © rmit Design Archives, rmit University and individual authors. many ways in which the collection might be seen to work and have implications for contemporary discourse on design. It has sought from This Journal is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, the nuances of a collection - the frayed edges, the insistent folds no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted – an active archive. by any means without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Section, Dec 1968 (No
    UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE CROSS-SECTION Issue No. 194 December 1, 1968 If The RAIA has bestowed its 1968 Gold Medal on architect Roy Grounds, for distinguished service in the Advancement of Architecture, thus crowning a career of notable achievement — and not before time! If Tasmanian architect Geoff Butterworth was awarded the St. Regis-A.C.I.-Scholarship for research into "Communications between Building Materials Suppliers and Architects". IF Melbourne's square, as everybody knows. Melbourne's square — as everybody knows — is caus- ing a lot of bellyaching and other birth-pangs among the locals. With at least one staunch ally on the City Council, the RAIA Vic. Chap. has mounted a model campaign to see that this opportunity for good Civic Planning is not allowed to lapse into the apathy of potted perennials. Hopes are high for an architectural competition: however, opinions vary about whether it should be international, Australia-wide, or restricted to Victoria. The problem is not so much how to design a square, as what to do with 11/2 acres of waste land between the side of a boom style town hall and the back of a gothic revival cathedral in the centre of a busy city. High on the list of idiot suggestions are 1) put a concrete replica of Batman's Boat (presumably in the middle of a sea of cement), and 2) an enormous floral clock (fitted with seats at a dollar a ride). C-S eagerly awaits the suggestion that it should be filled with buildings. We'll keep you posted.
    [Show full text]
  • National Gallery of Victoria (Former)
    Nationally Significant 20th-Century Architecture Revised 22/04/2011 National Gallery of Victoria (former) Address 180 St Kilda Road, Southbank 3006 Practice Grounds, Roy Designed 1959 Completed 1968 Address History & In 1959 Grounds, Romberg and Boyd were appointed architects to Description design a new NGV on a site in St Kilda Road. Later amid great 180 controversy Roy Grounds became the sole architect. His master plan placed the Gallery and two other smaller buildings at the southern end of the site, with the northern end reserved for the St Kilda Road future construction of a theatre and concert hall complex. The large palazzo-like gallery building is rectangular in form with Southbank three internal courtyards providing light and external views to surrounding galleries. The bluestone clad, reinforced concrete Victor 3006 building is relieved only by a large entrance archway and a bronze Victorian coat of arms by Norma Redpath on the front facade. The oriental influenced floating roof, with upturned eaves, is separated from the walls by a continuous band of high clerestorey windows, and a moat surrounds the entire building. The water theme is continued at the entry where a flow of water runs down a glass screen, now known as the water wall. The brief required the inclusion of a reception hall for State functions and this is four storeys in height and features an abstract ceiling of multi-coloured glass by the artist Leonard French. Two principal double height floors, at ground and second floor levels, contain the main gallery spaces, with intermediary floors containing many of the service RAIA Nº areas.
    [Show full text]
  • R047 Forrest Townhouses RSTCA
    Register of Significant Twentieth Century Architecture RSTCA No: R047 Name of Place: Forrest Townhouses Other/Former Names: Address/Location: 2 Arthur Circle and 3 Tasmania Circle FORREST 2603 Block 4 Section 11of Forrest Listing Status: Registered Other Heritage Listings: Date of Listing: Level of Significance: Citation Revision No: Category: Citation Revision Date: November 2004 Style: Date of Design: Designer: Construction Period: Client/Owner/Lessee: Date of Additions: Builder: Statement of Significance The Forrest Townhouses are an example of significant architecture and an educational resource. They are an excellent example of the Post-War Melbourne Regional style (1940-60) and are notable for displaying the design skill of the architect Sir Roy Grounds. The design incorporates many of the features that are specific to the style; widely projecting eaves, long unbroken roof line, narrow edge to roof and glass wall with regularly spaced timber mullions. The buildings also display elements of the Post-War International style, (1940-60), including cubiform overall shape and large sheets of glass The following design features are of additional significance; the steel roofing; overhang for shade; plain smooth wall surfaces; exposed rafters; the face concrete blockwork and courtyards; the double height living space overlooked from the gallery and open planning with the interiors opening out into the landscape; the limed ash joinery and paneling; the straw ceiling and exposed framing; the original detailing and type of finishes using natural materials. The townhouses were awarded the RAIA ACT Chapter Twenty Five Year Award in 1996. The complex is important for its strong association with the talented architect Sir Roy Grounds who is considered a key practitioner in the Post-War Melbourne Regional style in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER AIA Register of Significant Architecture February2021.Xls AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE of ARCHITECTS REGISTER of SIGNIFICANT BUILDINGS in NSW MASTER
    AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS REGISTER OF SIGNIFICANT BUILDINGS IN NSW MASTER O A & K HENDERSON / LOUIS A & K HENDERSON OF MELBOURNE, 1935 1940 1991, 1993, T&G Building 555 Dean Street Albury Albury City 4703473Card HENDERSON rear by LOUIS HARRISON 1994, 2006, 2008 H Graeme Gunn Graeme Gunn 1968-69 Baronda (Yencken House) Nelson Lake Road, Nelson Lagoon Mimosa Rocks Bega Valley 4703519 No Card National Park H Roy Grounds Roy Grounds 1964 1980 Penders Haighes Road Mimosa Rocks Bega Valley 4703518 Digital National Park Listing Card CH [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1937 Star of the Sea Catholic 19 Bega Street Tathra Bega Valley 4702325 Card Church G [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1860 1862 Extended 2004 Tathra Wharf & Building Wharf Road Tathra Bega Valley 4702326 Card not located H [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Residence Bega Road Wolumla Bega Valley 4702327 Card SC NSW Government Architect NSW Government Architect undated Public School and Residence Bega Road Wolumla Bega Valley 4702328 Card TH [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1911 Bellingen Council Chambers Hyde Street Bellingen Bellingen 4701129 Card P [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1910 Federal Hotel 77 Hyde Street Bellingen Bellingen 4701131 Card I G. E. MOORE G. E. MOORE 1912 Former Masonic Hall 121 Hyde Street Bellingen Bellingen 4701268 Card H [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1905 Residence 4 Coronation Street Bellingen Bellingen
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic 3: Suburban and Country Houses Listing Selection Guide Summary
    Domestic 3: Suburban and Country Houses Listing Selection Guide Summary Historic England’s twenty listing selection guides help to define which historic buildings are likely to meet the relevant tests for national designation and be included on the National Heritage List for England. Listing has been in place since 1947 and operates under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. If a building is felt to meet the necessary standards, it is added to the List. This decision is taken by the Government’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). These selection guides were originally produced by English Heritage in 2011: slightly revised versions are now being published by its successor body, Historic England. The DCMS‘ Principles of Selection for Listing Buildings set out the over-arching criteria of special architectural or historic interest required for listing and the guides provide more detail of relevant considerations for determining such interest for particular building types. See https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/principles-of- selection-for-listing-buildings. Each guide falls into two halves. The first defines the types of structures included in it, before going on to give a brisk overview of their characteristics and how these developed through time, with notice of the main architects and representative examples of buildings. The second half of the guide sets out the particular tests in terms of its architectural or historic interest a building has to meet if it is to be listed. A select bibliography gives suggestions for further reading. This guide, one of four on different types of Domestic Buildings, covers suburban and country houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Oktoberfest Munich - a Full Guide
    Destination Munich and Bavaria ~ 1 ~ A few words of introduction… Hi, and thanks for deciding to buy this copy of Destination Munich and Bavaria. I think it’s one of the best guides available to this region, but hey, I wrote it, so I would say that . I want you to make up your mind and if you’re not totally satisfied, remember, you can just ask for a refund. This book has about a dozen sections worth mentioning, so here goes: 1. The city maps are at the back of the book, but they’ll probably be the part you Wiener Platz (Vienna Square) in Munich. want to look at first. There are two public transportation maps and six full-age city maps starting from Page 276 2. The Table of Contents starts on Page 3. This lists every story in the eBook and you can click on the titles to go directly to any given story. 3. The Backstory section starts on Page 14. You probably know a little about Munich and Bavaria already. Do lederhosen, giant beer mugs and BWM ring any bells? This section is where you can learn a whole lot more about the history, traditions and people that have made the region both famous and infamous. 4. The Attractions section starts on Page 61. Munich boasts a plethora of museums, monuments, palaces and other highly see-able sights. The best ones, over 60 of them, are reviewed here. The attractions are grouped by area, there are sections on: the Spotlight: Munich and Bavaria Lederhosen, laptops and fairy-tale castles.
    [Show full text]