DOCSLIB.ORG

For Four Decades, Lovell Chen Has Not Only Shaped Melbourne's Collective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For Four Decades, Lovell Chen Has Not Only Shaped Melbourne's Collective Profile Lovell Chen Words by Peter Raisbeck Regent Theatre Melbourne-based architecture practice Lovell Chen of Lovell Chen, be it in masterplanning, the preparation Melbourne auditorium is home to one of the most extensive archives of conservation management plans or intricate ceiling bulkhead and truss detail. of architectural, heritage and conservation conservation work. Nor are the firm’s interests merely Image: Lovell Chen. knowledge in Australia. Even so, it would be wrong bound to Melbourne’s nineteenth-century fabric. Lovell Chen’s to characterize the firm’s work over the past four Lovell Chen is acutely aware of the circumstances intervention at the Trades decades in these terms alone. Lovell Chen has been of Australia’s other cities and regional centres, the Hall council chamber playing the long game, eschewing the limelight country’s modernist heritage as well as its histories in Carlton, Melbourne of design heroics in favour of rigorous research and of Indigenous and colonial landscapes. As would is “subtle, surgical and even joyful.” Photographs: design and collaborative processes. While many be expected of a firm of this intellectual depth, Lovell Peter Glenane (prior architects appear to espouse alternative practice Chen is wary that adaptive re-use has become a to restoration), Eve Wilson models, Lovell Chen has actually realized one. Under fashionable label, acknowledging that not all buildings (after restoration). For four decades, Lovell Chen the seemingly polite guise of heritage architecture, deserve adaptive re-use, nor is everything valuable; this firm has, over time, developed a compelling sometimes, what is removed is as important as what and radical practice model: the result of a complex is kept for the future. has not only shaped Melbourne’s interaction between ever-evolving expertise in design, All of this is brought together in design masterplanning, heritage, conservation, construction outcomes that surprise through their grace. and sustainability. It is a remarkable story. This is not the work of cookie cutters, nor of stylists collective memory, but acted The firm began as Allom Lovell and Associates who deploy a sly language regardless of the program, in 1981. Peter Lovell had graduated from the University nor the results of a larger-than-life formalism of irony. of Melbourne with a Bachelor of Building degree The practice’s approach is characterized by a process and an interest in best-practice building conservation. of research, design iteration and a search for detailed as a custodian of its fabric. Kai Chen joined in 1991, having meticulously crafted constructional solutions, depending on the project a number of residential commissions in his own context. This is a group of architects who still know practice, Robinson Chen. That body of work avoided how to detail. And in its work around the easy clichés of the modern bourgeois house in The firm’s conservation skills are evident favour of exploring space, colour and light. The firm in the work to Trades Hall in Carlton, a significant became Lovell Chen in 2005. site in the histories of trade unions in Victoria and Australia, the firm has Since then, the firm has grown to include the Australian Labor Party. The council chamber, five more principals: Kate Gray, Adam Mornement, built in 1891, had been destroyed by fire in 1960 and Anne-Marie Treweeke, Milica Tumbas and Katherine refurbished in what might be described as a kind been visionary in White. Together, the seven principals attest to the of utilitarian moderne style of that time: a flat white firm’s singular diversity, combined expertise and ceiling, brownish timber panels and some green no-nonsense principles of governance. As a result, modern textures. Lovell Chen has reversed the 1960s the firm is able to deploy its embedded knowledge work and highlighted the hall’s original configuration. breaking down the to resolve strategic issues, hard-nosed negotiations The result includes a new three-sided balcony and and intractable trade-offs. It is almost as if Lovell Chen arcaded side galleries. It is a subtle, surgical and even has knowingly designed itself to confront the wicked joyful intervention. old–new binary to problems and ethical quagmires inherent to The practice’s design skill is evident in its contemporary practice. work at the Bendigo Soldiers Memorial Institute. But there is more to it than this. Lovell Chen This project involved conservation work to a 1921 create “a poetry has not only been instrumental in shaping Melbourne’s Renaissance revival-style building and the addition collective memory as a city, it has also been its of a new pavilion. The new addition employs various custodian. There are few heritage buildings in the exterior devices: Corten steel as a single material, PROJECT REGENT THEATRE, MELBOURNE NOTE ENTRY # 4115-HERITAGE Awards. city that have not at some point had the involvement tapered massing and laser-cut decorative openings TITLE AUDITORIUM CEILING BULKHEAD & TRUSS DETAIL © COPYRIGHT This drawing is copyright and remains the based in ethical practice.” property of Lovell Chen. SCALE N/A 94 Architecture Australia Mar / Apr 2021 95 Profile At the Boyd and Renowden Chapels at the Springvale Botanical Cemetery in Melbourne, clarity was Lovell Chen’s primary aim. Photograph: Trevor Mein. A steel and glass structure has been added to provide shelter at the front of the chapels; its minimal design allows the 1930s portico to retain its visual impact. Photograph: Trevor Mein. At the Bendigo Soldiers Memorial Institute, Lovell Chen was involved in restoration, reconstruction and adaptation works as well as the addition of a pavilion, which has achieved Passive House certification. Photograph: Trevor Mein. Bendigo Soldiers Memorial Institute Passive House key Airtight membrane Passive House envelope Insulated envelope ORIGINAL FOOTPRINT Bendigo Soldiers Memorial Institute (ground floor gallery) 0 1 2 5 10 m Passive House envelope floor plan 1:400 Bendigo Soldiers Memorial Institute Passive House envelope section 1:400 0 12 5 (m) 96 Architecture Australia Mar / Apr 2021 97 Profile and trabeated rhythms expressed by the placement At the University of Melbourne’s Ormond College, The Wade Institute of the steel sheets. The siting of the new pavilion Lovell Chen has designed a series of projects in of Entrepreneurship, in the grounds of Ormond also allows the immediate landscape of the institute a context that includes buildings by Roy Grounds College at the University to be better apprehended. and Frederick Romberg. The largest of these projects of Melbourne, combines Even more remarkably, this new addition is the Wade Institute of Entrepreneurship, a teaching unconventional teaching spaces with a rooftop has been constructed according to Passive House building that explores the intersecting typologies tennis court. Photograph: principles. The tired old stereotype is that heritage of garden pavilion and cloister. The result is a brilliant John Gollings. architects are not early adopters, but Lovell Chen has riposte to the stuffiness of Grounds’s and Romberg’s Mesh columns are used been working with Passive House since 2014. This mid-century mannerisms. both inside and outside interest began as an effort to have increased agency Research is integral to the practice’s modus the Passive House building, in conservation contexts in the face of the whims operandi. The research infrastructure of the office providing a coherent design response to the of service engineers and has thus extended the Passive is outstanding, its library is second-to-none among complex architectural House principles into typologies beyond housing. architecture libraries – containing far more than context of the site. For Lovell Chen, the process of embedding just architecture books – and the firm is generous Photograph: John Gollings. new into old is not about merely making the formalist in sharing the library’s embodied knowledge with distinction between old and new. For less adept scholars, heritage experts, planners and policymakers. architects, this binary enables an easy reversibility – Moreover, unlike many other firms, Lovell Chen when mistakes are revealed later – and assuages actively encourages its staff to be involved in research the consciences of those architects who avoid initiatives, conferences and training programs, and it difficult choices. In contrast, Lovell Chen enfolds new has a research and development budget that it utilizes architectures, functions, fabrics and materials into for these activities. If only more architects employed existing structures in ways that are both visible and a similar research model. In this office, research is not invisible. This departure from the old-new binary confers pursued as a veil for self-interested pragmatism or an enormous responsibility on the architect not egotistic design. With similar humility, this practice has to blunder, whether through ignorance of the existing generously mentored many young architects over time. fabric or missteps in project implementation. Expert Lovell Chen searches for project knowledge information-gathering and decision-making is critical. grounded in detail and, once found, it articulates In going beyond the easy sophistries of the the truths that emerge from this context. This process old-new mantra, Lovell Chen has made subtle yet begins with an ethics that never abandons the significant contributions to the theory of adaptive memories of a city, a place or a landscape. Within re-use practice. Several further projects in the practice the firm there is a culture of modesty that belies portfolio indicate the results of these contributions. its achievements. The result is a poetry based in ethical At Melbourne’s Regent Theatre, a massive 3.7-metre practice rather than self-centred promotion or hunger extension to the front of the dress circle is held in place for the next social-media metric. This is a firm working by a new truss supported by piers hidden inside the to help its clients endure the tumult of future times existing walls.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
    St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne – Aikenhead Wing Proposed demolition Referral report and Heritage Impact Statement 27 & 31 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy July 2021 Prepared by Prepared for St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Quality Assurance Register The following quality assurance register documents the development and issue of this report prepared by Lovell Chen Pty Ltd in accordance with our quality management system. Project no. Issue no. Description Issue date Approval 8256.03 1 Draft for review 24 June 2021 PL/MK 8256.03 2 Final Referral Report and HIS 1 July 2021 PL Referencing Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced as endnotes or footnotes and/or in figure captions. Reasonable effort has been made to identify and acknowledge material from the relevant copyright owners. Moral Rights Lovell Chen Pty Ltd asserts its Moral right in this work, unless otherwise acknowledged, in accordance with the (Commonwealth) Copyright (Moral Rights) Amendment Act 2000. Lovell Chen’s moral rights include the attribution of authorship, the right not to have the work falsely attributed and the right to integrity of authorship. Limitation Lovell Chen grants the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) an irrevocable royalty- free right to reproduce or use the material from this report, except where such use infringes the copyright and/or Moral rights of Lovell Chen or third parties. This report is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Lovell Chen Pty Ltd and its Client. Lovell Chen Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Expert Heritage Evidence
    PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365 Heritage Overlay HO1205 Subject Site: “Chart House”, No. 372 - 378 Little Bourke Street Melbourne Expert Heritage Evidence Prepared for Berjaya Developments Pty Ltd By Robyn Riddett Director Anthemion Consultancies POB18183 Collins Street East Melbourne 8003 Tel. +61 3 9495 6389 Email: [email protected] December 2019 “Chart House” No. 372 - 378 Little Bourke Street, Melbourne 1.0 Introduction 1. I have been instructed by Best Hooper, on behalf of Berjaya Developments Pty Ltd, to prepare expert heritage evidence which addresses the heritage aspects of the proposal to grade the site as “Contibutory”, as a consequence of the Guildford and Hardware Laneways Heritage Study prepared by Lovell Chen in May 2017, as a consequence of Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365. 2. The previous Property Schedule included in the Guildford & Hardware Laneways Precinct Citation graded the building as Contributory. In effect it graded the east wall abutting Niagara Lane but not the façade addressing Little Bourke Street which Lovell Chen had indicated was not of any significance. Subsequently the Amendment C271 Panel recommended that “Chart House” be included within HO1205 with a Non-contributory grading. When HO1205 came into effect on 12 August 2019, No. 372 – 378 Little Bourke Street was included within HO1205 but with a Contributory, rather than with a Non- contributory grading and on an interim basis as a consequence of Amendment C355melb. This change in grading appears to have been influenced by correspondence from Melbourne Heritage Action which put forward new information about “Chart House”. It is now proposed, as a consequence of Amendment C365melb, to include No.
    [Show full text]
  • House at 4 Cobby Street, Campbell
    Register of Significant Twentieth Century Architecture RSTCA No: R103 Name of Place: House at 4 Cobby Street Campbell Address/Location: 4 Cobby Street, CAMPBELL ACT Block 5 Section 40 of Listing Status: Other Heritage Listings: Date of Listing: Level of Significance: Citation Revision No: Category: Citation Revision Date: Style: Date of Design: Designer: Construction Period: Client/Owner/Lessee: Date of Additions: Builder: Statement of Significance The residence at 4 Cobby Street, Campbell, is an example of significant architecture and an educational resource. The house is a good example of the Post-War International Style. The design incorporated some of the principal design features which are peculiar to the style including cubiform overall shape and large sheets of glass. The residence also displays elements of the Post-War Melbourne Regional Style including widely projecting eaves and long unbroken roof line. The architecture of this building may contribute to the education of designers in their understanding of post-war architectural styles. Sir Otto Frankel was recognised internationally as Australia's pre-eminent Geneticist and was a member of the executive of the CSIRO. A significant part of his work after his retirement, which was considered to be his most productive time, was undertaken in the residence. The design of this as his own residence highlights the significance of this house for its association with him. Description The three bedroom residence was designed by Roy Grounds, with Theo Bischoff as the project architect, in 1969-70 for Sir Otto and Lady Frankel and construction was completed in 1970-71 1. The building is a late example of a combination of two styles: the Post-War Melbourne Regional Style (1940-60) with its widely projecting eaves (at the rear only) and long, unbroken roof line and; the Post War International Style (1940-60) with its cubiform overall shape and large sheets of glass 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture Creating Connections Recognised in 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards Shortlist
    Architecture creating connections recognised in 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards shortlist The best of Victoria’s architecture, showcasing the immense value architects add when embedded end to end in a project, has been revealed with the release today of the 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards shortlist. The awards program, run by the Victorian Chapter of the Australian Institute of Architects, features a shortlist recognising architecture in the public realm, residential sector, regional areas, embedded sustainability and much more. Spread across 14 categories, 108 entries have made the shortlist which encompasses 76 individual projects. Victorian Chapter President Amy Muir says the shortlisted projects define the significant role that quality built outcomes have in creating sustainable, resilient buildings that can endure for generations. The selected projects go beyond the parameters of the brief to deliver compelling results. ‘This year’s shortlisted projects are exemplars of the outcomes that can be achieved when architects are engaged in the entire process, resulting in a strong collaboration between client, consultants and contracted builders,’ said Ms Muir. ‘These projects are leading examples of how architects elevate quality through carefully considered outcomes in the building process. The selected projects create a lasting legacy that enable architecture to be accessed more broadly throughout the community. ‘During these strange times we are thrilled to celebrate architecture that continues to challenge the status quo. In
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management
    VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS Conservation Management Plan Prepared for Places Victoria & City of Melbourne June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi PROJECT TEAM xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Melbourne Docklands 1 1.3 Master planning & development 2 1.4 Heritage status 2 1.5 Location 2 1.6 Methodology 2 1.7 Report content 4 1.7.1 Management and development 4 1.7.2 Background and contextual history 4 1.7.3 Physical survey and analysis 4 1.7.4 Heritage significance 4 1.7.5 Conservation policy and strategy 5 1.8 Sources 5 1.9 Historic images and documents 5 2.0 MANAGEMENT 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Management responsibilities 7 2.2.1 Management history 7 2.2.2 Current management arrangements 7 2.3 Heritage controls 10 2.3.1 Victorian Heritage Register 10 2.3.2 Victorian Heritage Inventory 10 2.3.3 Melbourne Planning Scheme 12 2.3.4 National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 12 2.4 Heritage approvals & statutory obligations 12 2.4.1 Where permits are required 12 2.4.2 Permit exemptions and minor works 12 2.4.3 Heritage Victoria permit process and requirements 13 2.4.4 Heritage impacts 14 2.4.5 Project planning and timing 14 2.4.6 Appeals 15 LOVELL CHEN i 3.0 HISTORY 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Pre-contact history 17 3.3 Early European occupation 17 3.4 Early Melbourne shipping and port activity 18 3.5 Railways development and expansion 20 3.6 Victoria Dock 21 3.6.1 Planning the dock 21 3.6.2 Constructing the dock 22 3.6.3 West Melbourne Dock opens
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists' Houses in Canberra 1950–1970
    EXPERIMENTS IN MODERN LIVING SCIENTISTS’ HOUSES IN CANBERRA 1950–1970 EXPERIMENTS IN MODERN LIVING SCIENTISTS’ HOUSES IN CANBERRA 1950–1970 MILTON CAMERON Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Cameron, Milton. Title: Experiments in modern living : scientists’ houses in Canberra, 1950 - 1970 / Milton Cameron. ISBN: 9781921862694 (pbk.) 9781921862700 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Scientists--Homes and haunts--Australian Capital Territority--Canberra. Architecture, Modern Architecture--Australian Capital Territority--Canberra. Canberra (A.C.T.)--Buildings, structures, etc Dewey Number: 720.99471 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by Sarah Evans. Front cover photograph of Fenner House by Ben Wrigley, 2012. Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press; revised August 2012 Contents Acknowledgments . vii Illustrations . xi Abbreviations . xv Introduction: Domestic Voyeurism . 1 1. Age of the Masters: Establishing a scientific and intellectual community in Canberra, 1946–1968 . 7 2 . Paradigm Shift: Boyd and the Fenner House . 43 3 . Promoting the New Paradigm: Seidler and the Zwar House . 77 4 . Form Follows Formula: Grounds, Boyd and the Philip House . 101 5 . Where Science Meets Art: Bischoff and the Gascoigne House . 131 6 . The Origins of Form: Grounds, Bischoff and the Frankel House . 161 Afterword: Before and After Science .
    [Show full text]
  • City of Port Phillip Heritage Review
    City of Port Phillip Heritage Review Place name: B.A.L.M. Paints Factory Citation No: Administration Building 8 (former) Other names: - Address: 2 Salmon Street, Port Heritage Precinct: None Melbourne Heritage Overlay: HO282 Category: Factory Graded as: Significant Style: Interwar Modernist Victorian Heritage Register: No Constructed: 1937 Designer: Unknown Amendment: C29, C161 Comment: Revised citation Significance What is significant? The former B.A.L.M. Paints factory administration building, to the extent of the building as constructed in 1937 at 2 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne, is significant. This is in the European Modernist manner having a plain stuccoed and brick façade with fluted Art Deco parapet treatment and projecting hood to the windows emphasising the horizontality of the composition. There is a tower towards the west end with a flag pole mounted on a tiered base in the Streamlined Moderne mode and porthole motif constituting the key stylistic elements. The brickwork between the windows is extended vertically through the cement window hood in ornamental terminations. Non-original alterations and additions to the building are not significant. How is it significant? The former B.A.L.M. Paints factory administration building at 2 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne is of local historic, architectural and aesthetic significance to the City of Port Phillip. City of Port Phillip Heritage Review Citation No: 8 Why is it significant? It is historically important (Criterion A) as evidence of the importance of the locality as part of Melbourne's inner industrial hub during the inter-war period, also recalling the presence of other paint manufacturers at Port Melbourne including Glazebrooks, also in Williamstown Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Grounds, Boyd and the Philip House
    4. Form Follows Formula: Grounds, Boyd and the Philip House Figure 4.1 Philip House, view from north-east Photograph: Ben Wrigley, 2011 John Philip was brought to Canberra as part of Frankel’s ambitious postwar recruitment program, and was appointed head of a new agricultural physics group at the CSIRO. Regarded as Australia’s leading environmental physicist, he was elected a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science in 1967. His wife, Frances (‘Fay’), was an accomplished artist who was related to the Boyds via the Mills and à Becketts, and had attended the Murrumbeena State School in Victoria with Mary and Arthur Boyd. Many of Frances’s portraits of Australia’s leading scientists and academics—including Sir Mark Oliphant, Doug Waterhouse, John Jaeger, William Rogers, Patrick Moran and Manning Clark—are held in the collections of the Australian Academy of Science and The Australian National University. The Philip House, at 42 Vasey Crescent, Campbell, is one of three adjacent houses by Grounds, Romberg and Boyd that are known collectively as the Vasey Crescent Group. The other two houses in the group are the Blakers House and the Griffing House. Grounds and Boyd were both involved with these houses. All three were designed by Grounds, who arranged initial briefings, recorded 101 Experiments in Modern Living the clients’ requirements and prepared sketches from late 1959 through to early 1960. Boyd met with the clients in January 1960, and took control of the houses from May of that year as Grounds prepared for a three-month overseas trip.1 The Philip House is important for two reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • RMIT Design ARCHIVES JOURNAL Vol 3 Nº 1 2013 RMIT Design ARCHIVES JOURNAL Vol 3 Nº 1 2013 Frederick Romberg: an Architectural Survey
    RMIT DesIgn ARCHIVES JOURnAL Vol 3 Nº 1 2013 RMIT DesIgn ARCHIVES JOURnAL Vol 3 Nº 1 2013 Frederick Romberg: an architectural survey Since its beginning the RMIT Design Archives has actively sought Guest Editor Journal Editor methods of engaging contemporary design practitioners in contributing Michael Spooner Harriet Edquist to its innovative approaches to collecting and research. The Romberg Collection, deposited in 2008, documents the practice Editorial Assistance Design of eminent Melbourne architect Frederick Romberg. It has been over Kaye Ashton Letterbox.net.au ten years since the first and last exposition on Romberg’s output was held at RMIT Gallery. That exhibition and subsequent publication, contact Frederick Romberg: The Architecture of Migration 1936–1975, continue [email protected] to serve as the most complete public record of his work to date.1 www.rmit.edu.au/designarchives Frederick Romberg: an architectural survey is a collaborative inter- issn 1838-9406 disciplinary project that has approached the Romberg Collection with Published by rmit Design Archives, rmit University the intention of examining not only his architectural output, but the Text © rmit Design Archives, rmit University and individual authors. many ways in which the collection might be seen to work and have implications for contemporary discourse on design. It has sought from This Journal is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, the nuances of a collection - the frayed edges, the insistent folds no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted – an active archive. by any means without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Evidence and Report to Planning Panel
    Statement of Evidence and Report to Planning Panel Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Amendment C235 106 Williamson Street, Bendigo Statement of Evidence Prepared by Peter Lovell Instructed by Rigby Cooke Lawyers March 2021 Prepared by Prepared for Spring Design and Development Pty Ltd Statement of Qualifications and Experience, and Declaration Authorship This statement has been prepared by Mr Peter Haynes Lovell, Director of Lovell Chen Pty Ltd, Architects and Heritage Consultants, Level 5, 176 Wellington Parade, East Melbourne, assisted by Ms Charlotte Jenkins, Heritage Consultant and Ms Libby Richardson, Heritage Consultant. The views expressed in the statement are those of Mr Peter Lovell. Qualifications and Experience I have a Bachelor of Building degree from Melbourne University and have been director of the above practice, which I established with Richard Allom in 1981. Over the past 40 years I have worked in the field of building conservation and have been involved in, and responsible for, a wide range of conservation related projects. These projects include the preparation of conservation/heritage studies for the Borough of Queenscliffe, the former City of South Melbourne, the former City of Fitzroy and the former City of Port Melbourne. In addition, I have acted as heritage advisor to the Borough of Queenscliffe and the former City of South Melbourne. In the area of conservation management planning I have been responsible for the preparation of a wide range of conservation analyses and plans including those for the Melbourne Town Hall and Administration Building, the State Library and Museum, the Supreme Court of Victoria, Werribee Park, the Regent Theatre, the Bendigo Post Office, Flinders Street Station, the Old Melbourne Observatory and the Mt Buffalo Chalet.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Section, Dec 1968 (No
    UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE CROSS-SECTION Issue No. 194 December 1, 1968 If The RAIA has bestowed its 1968 Gold Medal on architect Roy Grounds, for distinguished service in the Advancement of Architecture, thus crowning a career of notable achievement — and not before time! If Tasmanian architect Geoff Butterworth was awarded the St. Regis-A.C.I.-Scholarship for research into "Communications between Building Materials Suppliers and Architects". IF Melbourne's square, as everybody knows. Melbourne's square — as everybody knows — is caus- ing a lot of bellyaching and other birth-pangs among the locals. With at least one staunch ally on the City Council, the RAIA Vic. Chap. has mounted a model campaign to see that this opportunity for good Civic Planning is not allowed to lapse into the apathy of potted perennials. Hopes are high for an architectural competition: however, opinions vary about whether it should be international, Australia-wide, or restricted to Victoria. The problem is not so much how to design a square, as what to do with 11/2 acres of waste land between the side of a boom style town hall and the back of a gothic revival cathedral in the centre of a busy city. High on the list of idiot suggestions are 1) put a concrete replica of Batman's Boat (presumably in the middle of a sea of cement), and 2) an enormous floral clock (fitted with seats at a dollar a ride). C-S eagerly awaits the suggestion that it should be filled with buildings. We'll keep you posted.
    [Show full text]
  • National Gallery of Victoria (Former)
    Nationally Significant 20th-Century Architecture Revised 22/04/2011 National Gallery of Victoria (former) Address 180 St Kilda Road, Southbank 3006 Practice Grounds, Roy Designed 1959 Completed 1968 Address History & In 1959 Grounds, Romberg and Boyd were appointed architects to Description design a new NGV on a site in St Kilda Road. Later amid great 180 controversy Roy Grounds became the sole architect. His master plan placed the Gallery and two other smaller buildings at the southern end of the site, with the northern end reserved for the St Kilda Road future construction of a theatre and concert hall complex. The large palazzo-like gallery building is rectangular in form with Southbank three internal courtyards providing light and external views to surrounding galleries. The bluestone clad, reinforced concrete Victor 3006 building is relieved only by a large entrance archway and a bronze Victorian coat of arms by Norma Redpath on the front facade. The oriental influenced floating roof, with upturned eaves, is separated from the walls by a continuous band of high clerestorey windows, and a moat surrounds the entire building. The water theme is continued at the entry where a flow of water runs down a glass screen, now known as the water wall. The brief required the inclusion of a reception hall for State functions and this is four storeys in height and features an abstract ceiling of multi-coloured glass by the artist Leonard French. Two principal double height floors, at ground and second floor levels, contain the main gallery spaces, with intermediary floors containing many of the service RAIA Nº areas.
    [Show full text]