DOCSLIB.ORG

Statement of Evidence and Report to Planning Panel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statement of Evidence and Report to Planning Panel Statement of Evidence and Report to Planning Panel Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C258 City of Melbourne Heritage Review July 2018 Prepared by Prepared for City of Melbourne Statement of Qualifications and Experience, and Declaration Authorship of this report This statement of evidence has been prepared by Ms Anita Brady, Associate Director of Lovell Chen Pty Ltd, Architects and Heritage Consultants, Level 5, 176 Wellington Parade, East Melbourne, assisted by Ms Libby Blamey, Senior Associate also of Lovell Chen. The views expressed in the statement are those of Ms Anita Brady. Qualifications and Experience I hold a Masters of Arts (Public History) from Monash University, and a Bachelor of Arts (Hons) from the University of Melbourne. I have been involved in cultural heritage practice and management for over 20 years in both the public and private sectors. This experience includes heritage appraisals of properties and assessments of impacts on heritage places, and strategic planning and policy development for heritage places. While employed at Heritage Victoria for four years, I was the principal author of the Victorian Heritage Strategy (May 2000), and Secretary to the Heritage Council’s Policy and Protocols Committee. I have also published on cultural heritage matters. I have been employed by Lovell Chen (formerly Allom Lovell & Associates) since June 2001, and was made Associate Director in July 2005. I am responsible for leading multi-disciplinary teams with expertise in architecture, history and planning. During this time, I have undertaken numerous heritage assessments of properties, authored reports on heritage matters for planning panels, prepared expert witness statements, and given evidence before planning appeals tribunals. I have also managed a number of municipal heritage studies, gaps studies and reviews for local Government authorities, including for the municipalities of Boroondara, Yarra, Yarra Ranges, Greater Bendigo, Port Phillip and Melbourne. I have additionally been involved in the preparation of conservation management plans, analyses and reports, for places as diverse as the Records Office, Melbourne; Capital Performing Arts Centre, Bendigo; Beehive Building, Bendigo; No 3 Treasury Place, Melbourne; Beaurepaire Centre, Melbourne University; No 2 Goods Shed, Melbourne Docklands; Swing Bridge, Sale; Catani Gardens, St Kilda; Port of Fremantle; Cascades Convict Female Factory, Hobart; and Point Nepean Quarantine Station. I have contributed to master plans for Victoria Park, Abbotsford, and Commonwealth land at Point Nepean; and undertaken heritage appraisals of residential buildings, industrial sites and institutional complexes across Melbourne. I have managed a national heritage assessment and review of Australia Post properties; was responsible for preparation of the Yarra Planning Scheme Clause 43.01-2 Incorporated Plan, Planning Permit Exemptions July 2014. Instructions My instructions were included in correspondence from Brigid Ryan, Legal Counsel for the City of Melbourne, dated 26 June 2018. Lovell Chen involvement leading up to instructions Section 2.0 of this statement provides a detailed overview of my involvement and that of Lovell Chen in the heritage work which is subject to Amendment C258. I was responsible for managing the project at Lovell Chen, including participating in the policies review and writing; the property gradings review and conversion; preparation of the statements of significance; and the (external and internal) community and stakeholder consultation and engagement. I was also responsible for reviewing all written outputs; and was the author of the two methodology reports referred to in this statement of evidence. Note that the Clause 22.04 and Clause 22.05 heritage policies which are subject to this Amendment, are revised and updated from the May 2016 version of the policies, which is the date of the latest policies into which I and Lovell Chen had input. LOVELL CHEN i Summary of my opinion The precinct statements of significance, including the assessed levels of significance of the precincts; the changes made to the statements following receipt of submissions; and the changes recommended in this statement to the ‘panel version’ of the statements, continue to be supported. The revised local heritage policies at Clause 22.04 and Clause 22.05 also continue to be supported, subject to the matters identified here which require further clarification and consideration. The review of the property gradings and conversion to the new gradings system, including the methodology which underpins the review, is additionally supported, including the approach which involved review of some 4,800 properties of ‘C’ and ‘D’ grading. Declaration I adopt this statement and no matters of significance which I regard as relevant have to my knowledge been withheld from the Panel. Anita Brady ii LOVELL CHEN Contents 1.0 Introduction 3 1.1 Community and stakeholder engagement 3 1.2 Heritage Strategy 2013 3 1.3 Discussion paper July 2014 4 1.4 Content of this statement 4 2.0 Chronological overview of project stages 5 3.0 Precinct statements of significance 6 3.1 Introduction 6 3.2 Methodology 7 3.2.1 Precinct citation content 7 3.2.2 Precinct significance 8 3.3 Response to submissions on statements of significance 8 3.3.1 Statements of significance February 2018 8 3.3.2 Additional submissions 10 4.0 Heritage policies review 10 4.1 Introduction 10 4.2 Methodology 11 4.2.1 Visibility of additions and higher rear parts of new buildings 11 4.3 New gradings definitions 21 4.3.1 Significant places 22 4.3.2 Contributory places 22 4.3.3 Non-contributory places 22 4.4 Commentary on the revised and updated policies 22 4.4.1 Definitions 22 5.0 Gradings review 24 5.1 Introduction 24 5.1.1 Scope of gradings review 25 5.1.2 July 2014 discussion paper 25 5.2 Methodology 27 5.2.1 Sampling exercise and outcomes 27 5.2.2 Approach to gradings review 27 5.2.3 Streetscapes 29 5.2.4 Desktop work 29 5.2.5 Excel spreadsheet 30 5.2.6 Internal review 31 5.2.7 Statistics 31 5.3 Response to submissions on gradings review 32 LOVELL CHEN 1 5.3.1 Report to the Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee meeting (20 February 2018) 36 6.0 Concluding comments 36 2 LOVELL CHEN 1.0 Introduction This statement of evidence has been prepared for the City of Melbourne and addresses Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C258, with specific reference to the following components of the Amendment as undertaken by Lovell Chen (the scope of these components is elaborated below): • Preparation of statements of significance for precincts outside the CCZ • Review and preparation of revised local heritage policies at Clause 22.04 and Clause 22.05 • Review of property gradings and conversion to new gradings system Some of the content in this statement includes, and in part reproduces, elements of the two Methodology Reports which document and outline the approach to the work undertaken, specifically: • City of Melbourne Heritage Review: Local Heritage Policies and Precinct Statements of Significance Methodology Report, Lovell Chen, September 2015 updated May 2016 (Attachment 1 to this statement and generally referred to below as the ‘Heritage Review Methodology Report’); note that this report includes (as appendices) the current and revised local heritage policies and the new precinct statements of significance (as of May 2016); Appendix E of the report is not included in Attachment 1 (this is referred to below under ‘Community and stakeholder engagement’) • City of Melbourne Heritage Gradings Review Methodology Report, Lovell Chen, October 2015 (Attachment 2 to this statement and generally referred to below as the ‘Gradings Review Methodology Report’) Note also that some clarifications or corrections to the Amendment documentation are identified in this statement. 1.1 Community and stakeholder engagement Community and targeted stakeholder consultation and engagement was undertaken in relation to the project components. Capire Consulting Group facilitated the majority of the consultation, which was undertaken in a variety of formats. Capire’s report, ‘Summary of engagement findings’, October 2015, was included in the Heritage Review Methodology Report as Appendix E.1 Community consultation and engagement was held in the period March and April 2015. It included six community workshops held in relation to the heritage precincts in Kensington, Parkville, North and West Melbourne, South Yarra, East Melbourne and Jolimont, and Carlton. These workshops were preceded by short walks in the precincts, lead by Anita Brady. The consultation also included two workshops with ‘internal’ (Council) stakeholders, being City of Melbourne officers and Heritage Advisors, including a review of the draft revised local heritage policies. An external community workshop which focused on the heritage policies was also held.2 In addition the draft heritage policies, and policy issues, were canvassed with external stakeholders including representatives from the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, the National Trust and the Melbourne Heritage Action Group. 1.2 Heritage Strategy 2013 The City of Melbourne Heritage Strategy 20133 set out a plan to continue the identification and protection of the municipality’s heritage over the next 15 years; and set in train a program of heritage reviews. The Strategy acknowledged some shortcomings with the City’s older heritage studies, including the lack of statements of significance for the most significant places, and gaps
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
    St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne – Aikenhead Wing Proposed demolition Referral report and Heritage Impact Statement 27 & 31 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy July 2021 Prepared by Prepared for St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Quality Assurance Register The following quality assurance register documents the development and issue of this report prepared by Lovell Chen Pty Ltd in accordance with our quality management system. Project no. Issue no. Description Issue date Approval 8256.03 1 Draft for review 24 June 2021 PL/MK 8256.03 2 Final Referral Report and HIS 1 July 2021 PL Referencing Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced as endnotes or footnotes and/or in figure captions. Reasonable effort has been made to identify and acknowledge material from the relevant copyright owners. Moral Rights Lovell Chen Pty Ltd asserts its Moral right in this work, unless otherwise acknowledged, in accordance with the (Commonwealth) Copyright (Moral Rights) Amendment Act 2000. Lovell Chen’s moral rights include the attribution of authorship, the right not to have the work falsely attributed and the right to integrity of authorship. Limitation Lovell Chen grants the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) an irrevocable royalty- free right to reproduce or use the material from this report, except where such use infringes the copyright and/or Moral rights of Lovell Chen or third parties. This report is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Lovell Chen Pty Ltd and its Client. Lovell Chen Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Expert Heritage Evidence
    PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365 Heritage Overlay HO1205 Subject Site: “Chart House”, No. 372 - 378 Little Bourke Street Melbourne Expert Heritage Evidence Prepared for Berjaya Developments Pty Ltd By Robyn Riddett Director Anthemion Consultancies POB18183 Collins Street East Melbourne 8003 Tel. +61 3 9495 6389 Email: [email protected] December 2019 “Chart House” No. 372 - 378 Little Bourke Street, Melbourne 1.0 Introduction 1. I have been instructed by Best Hooper, on behalf of Berjaya Developments Pty Ltd, to prepare expert heritage evidence which addresses the heritage aspects of the proposal to grade the site as “Contibutory”, as a consequence of the Guildford and Hardware Laneways Heritage Study prepared by Lovell Chen in May 2017, as a consequence of Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365. 2. The previous Property Schedule included in the Guildford & Hardware Laneways Precinct Citation graded the building as Contributory. In effect it graded the east wall abutting Niagara Lane but not the façade addressing Little Bourke Street which Lovell Chen had indicated was not of any significance. Subsequently the Amendment C271 Panel recommended that “Chart House” be included within HO1205 with a Non-contributory grading. When HO1205 came into effect on 12 August 2019, No. 372 – 378 Little Bourke Street was included within HO1205 but with a Contributory, rather than with a Non- contributory grading and on an interim basis as a consequence of Amendment C355melb. This change in grading appears to have been influenced by correspondence from Melbourne Heritage Action which put forward new information about “Chart House”. It is now proposed, as a consequence of Amendment C365melb, to include No.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture Creating Connections Recognised in 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards Shortlist
    Architecture creating connections recognised in 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards shortlist The best of Victoria’s architecture, showcasing the immense value architects add when embedded end to end in a project, has been revealed with the release today of the 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards shortlist. The awards program, run by the Victorian Chapter of the Australian Institute of Architects, features a shortlist recognising architecture in the public realm, residential sector, regional areas, embedded sustainability and much more. Spread across 14 categories, 108 entries have made the shortlist which encompasses 76 individual projects. Victorian Chapter President Amy Muir says the shortlisted projects define the significant role that quality built outcomes have in creating sustainable, resilient buildings that can endure for generations. The selected projects go beyond the parameters of the brief to deliver compelling results. ‘This year’s shortlisted projects are exemplars of the outcomes that can be achieved when architects are engaged in the entire process, resulting in a strong collaboration between client, consultants and contracted builders,’ said Ms Muir. ‘These projects are leading examples of how architects elevate quality through carefully considered outcomes in the building process. The selected projects create a lasting legacy that enable architecture to be accessed more broadly throughout the community. ‘During these strange times we are thrilled to celebrate architecture that continues to challenge the status quo. In
    [Show full text]
  • MLBGEN Master Map 5 November 2012
    Melbourne city map Accessible toilet ARDEN ST BBQ STORY ST Bike path offroad/onroad Police Cinema GRAINGER QUEENSBERRY ST HARCOURT ST MUSEUM DRYBURGH ST ROYAL Parking WOMEN’S City Circle Tram route with HOSPITAL BAILLIE ST FLEMINGTON RD stops MELBOURNEROYAL Places of interest HOSPITAL ABBOTSFORDPROVOST ST ST ARDEN SIDING RAILWAY VILLIERS ST MUSEUMIAN POTTER OF ART Educational facility Melbourne Visitor GRATTAN ST Places of worship MUNSTER TCE STAWELL ST LAURENS ST Shuttle bus stop Hospital Playground OF MELBOURNEUNIVERSITY Tram route with platform WRECKYNARTS HOUSE ST Marina VICTORIA ST stops MARKETMEAT Post Office LOTHIAN ST *UseROYAL these PDE colours only in ELM ST ELGIN ST Taxi rank Tram stop zone CINEMA MILLER ST BLACKWOOD ST Docklands-specic7 maps/brochures. NOVA Train station COURTNEY ST < Walking time: 3 to 5 minutes Theatre To Sydney ANDERSON ST NORTH MELBOURNE via Train route TOWN HALL Sydney Rd Toilet RAILWAY PL & LIBRARY 6 MELBOURNE GOODS RAILWAY BERKELEY ST FARADAY ST 11/12 CURZON ST BEDFORD ST Road under construction/ PELHAM ST BARRY ST QUEENSBERRY ST ELIZABETH ST > future development site ERROL ST CARDIGAN ST LA MAMA THEATRE N MUSEO ITALIANO o JOHNSON ST SPENCER ST r CULTURAL CENTRE M t To LYGON ST LEVESON ST Visitor information centre e h BERKELEY ST Melb. Uni., lbo Melb. Cemetery DRYBURGH ST u STBARRY and Dental EADES PL EADES To Melbourne VICTORIA ST NORTH MELBOURNE RAILWAY Bike share − closest rn IRELAND ST e Hosp. GRATTAN ST ADDERLEY STlocation to Melbourne Zoo ABBOTSFORD ST BARKLY ST BRUNSWICK ST Visitor Centre/Booth
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management
    VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS Conservation Management Plan Prepared for Places Victoria & City of Melbourne June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi PROJECT TEAM xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Melbourne Docklands 1 1.3 Master planning & development 2 1.4 Heritage status 2 1.5 Location 2 1.6 Methodology 2 1.7 Report content 4 1.7.1 Management and development 4 1.7.2 Background and contextual history 4 1.7.3 Physical survey and analysis 4 1.7.4 Heritage significance 4 1.7.5 Conservation policy and strategy 5 1.8 Sources 5 1.9 Historic images and documents 5 2.0 MANAGEMENT 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Management responsibilities 7 2.2.1 Management history 7 2.2.2 Current management arrangements 7 2.3 Heritage controls 10 2.3.1 Victorian Heritage Register 10 2.3.2 Victorian Heritage Inventory 10 2.3.3 Melbourne Planning Scheme 12 2.3.4 National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 12 2.4 Heritage approvals & statutory obligations 12 2.4.1 Where permits are required 12 2.4.2 Permit exemptions and minor works 12 2.4.3 Heritage Victoria permit process and requirements 13 2.4.4 Heritage impacts 14 2.4.5 Project planning and timing 14 2.4.6 Appeals 15 LOVELL CHEN i 3.0 HISTORY 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Pre-contact history 17 3.3 Early European occupation 17 3.4 Early Melbourne shipping and port activity 18 3.5 Railways development and expansion 20 3.6 Victoria Dock 21 3.6.1 Planning the dock 21 3.6.2 Constructing the dock 22 3.6.3 West Melbourne Dock opens
    [Show full text]
  • City of Port Phillip Heritage Review
    City of Port Phillip Heritage Review Place name: B.A.L.M. Paints Factory Citation No: Administration Building 8 (former) Other names: - Address: 2 Salmon Street, Port Heritage Precinct: None Melbourne Heritage Overlay: HO282 Category: Factory Graded as: Significant Style: Interwar Modernist Victorian Heritage Register: No Constructed: 1937 Designer: Unknown Amendment: C29, C161 Comment: Revised citation Significance What is significant? The former B.A.L.M. Paints factory administration building, to the extent of the building as constructed in 1937 at 2 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne, is significant. This is in the European Modernist manner having a plain stuccoed and brick façade with fluted Art Deco parapet treatment and projecting hood to the windows emphasising the horizontality of the composition. There is a tower towards the west end with a flag pole mounted on a tiered base in the Streamlined Moderne mode and porthole motif constituting the key stylistic elements. The brickwork between the windows is extended vertically through the cement window hood in ornamental terminations. Non-original alterations and additions to the building are not significant. How is it significant? The former B.A.L.M. Paints factory administration building at 2 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne is of local historic, architectural and aesthetic significance to the City of Port Phillip. City of Port Phillip Heritage Review Citation No: 8 Why is it significant? It is historically important (Criterion A) as evidence of the importance of the locality as part of Melbourne's inner industrial hub during the inter-war period, also recalling the presence of other paint manufacturers at Port Melbourne including Glazebrooks, also in Williamstown Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Evidence and Report to Planning Panel
    Statement of Evidence and Report to Planning Panel Greater Bendigo Planning Scheme Amendment C235 106 Williamson Street, Bendigo Statement of Evidence Prepared by Peter Lovell Instructed by Rigby Cooke Lawyers March 2021 Prepared by Prepared for Spring Design and Development Pty Ltd Statement of Qualifications and Experience, and Declaration Authorship This statement has been prepared by Mr Peter Haynes Lovell, Director of Lovell Chen Pty Ltd, Architects and Heritage Consultants, Level 5, 176 Wellington Parade, East Melbourne, assisted by Ms Charlotte Jenkins, Heritage Consultant and Ms Libby Richardson, Heritage Consultant. The views expressed in the statement are those of Mr Peter Lovell. Qualifications and Experience I have a Bachelor of Building degree from Melbourne University and have been director of the above practice, which I established with Richard Allom in 1981. Over the past 40 years I have worked in the field of building conservation and have been involved in, and responsible for, a wide range of conservation related projects. These projects include the preparation of conservation/heritage studies for the Borough of Queenscliffe, the former City of South Melbourne, the former City of Fitzroy and the former City of Port Melbourne. In addition, I have acted as heritage advisor to the Borough of Queenscliffe and the former City of South Melbourne. In the area of conservation management planning I have been responsible for the preparation of a wide range of conservation analyses and plans including those for the Melbourne Town Hall and Administration Building, the State Library and Museum, the Supreme Court of Victoria, Werribee Park, the Regent Theatre, the Bendigo Post Office, Flinders Street Station, the Old Melbourne Observatory and the Mt Buffalo Chalet.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Report to Council Planning Scheme Amendment C365 Chart
    Committee report to Council Agenda item 3.1 Special Council Planning Scheme Amendment C365 Chart House Heritage 25 March 2020 Committee Future Melbourne (Planning (Heritage) Portfolio) Presenter Councillor Leppert Purpose 1. The purpose of this report is to seek Council adoption of Amendment C365 to include Chart House within the Heritage Overlay with the grading of non-contributory, as recommended by the Panel. Consideration at Committee 2. Following consideration by the Future Melbourne Committee on 3 March 2020, the Committee made a recommendation to Council as presented below. Recommendation 3. That Council: 3.1 Adopts Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365 as exhibited with the changes recommended by the Panel. 3.2 Submits the adopted Amendment to the Minister for Planning for approval. 3.3 Authorises the Acting General Manager Strategy, Planning and Climate Change to make any further minor editorial changes to the amendment documents prior to submitting to the Minister for Planning for approval. Council Report Attachment: 1. Future Melbourne Committee, Agenda item 6.3, 3 March 2020 Page 1 of 241 Report to the Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee Agenda item 6.3 Planning Scheme Amendment C365 Chart House Heritage 3 March 2020 Presenter: Kate Dundas, Acting Director City Strategy Purpose and background 1. The purpose of this report is to recommend that the Future Melbourne Committee (FMC), having considered the Planning Panel’s report, seeks Council adoption of Amendment C365 to include Chart House within the Heritage Overlay with the grading of non-contributory, as recommended by the Panel. 2. Amendment C365 proposes to include Chart House (372-382 Little Bourke Street) within the Heritage Overlay on a permanent basis and identify it as contributory to the Guildford and Hardware Lane Precinct (HO1205).
    [Show full text]
  • Another Two Diagonal Avenues Intersect the Site, Radiating from the Central Section of the Gardens on Carlton Street, to the Two Southern Entry Points
    ROYAL EXHIBITION BUILDING AND CARLTON GARDENS Another two diagonal avenues intersect the site, radiating from the central section of the gardens on Carlton Street, to the two southern entry points. The avenue on the east side is planted with Plane trees (Platanus x acerifolia). Near the Works Depot, in the avenue’s most northern extent, the trees are planted at wide spacings. This may have been a realisation of John Guilfoyle’s 1916 proposal to remove every second plane tree from the South Garden Plane Tree Avenue. It is unclear when the removal was to take place. The plane tree avenue referred to may have been that in the North Garden and not the one in the South Garden. In the southern section the trees are closely spaced, forming a denser over canopy and providing a stronger sense of enclosure. The avenue on the opposite diagonal on the west side of the gardens is planted with Grey Poplars (Populus x canescens) also reaching senescence. A replanting on the south-west side of this avenue with poplars occurred in 2006. The avenue’s integrity is strongest near Carlton Street where the trees are regularly spaced and provide good canopy coverage. 4.4.5 North Garden Boundary Trees The layout of the North Garden in the 1890s was primarily based on extensive avenue plantings crossing the site, with little in the way of other ornamentation. Individual specimen trees were mainly planted around the perimeter of the site, forming loose boundary plantations. The spaces between the avenue plantations remained relatively free of in-fill plantings, with expanses of turf being the primary surface treatment in these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Finals Volume I—1897-1938
    aMs Er te e rEMi eAGU ind the PBALL L Es beh FOOT Tori RIAN THE s TO of the VIC Volume II 1 939-1978 Companion volume to Grand Finals Volume I—1897-1938 Introduction by Geoff Slattery visit slatterymedia.com The Slattery Media Group 1 Albert Street, Richmond Victoria, Australia, 3121 visit slatterymedia.com Copyright © The Slattery Media Group, 2012 Images copyright © Newspix / News Ltd First published by the The Slattery Media Group, 2012 ®™ The AFL logo and competing team logos, emblems and names used are all trade marks of and used under licence from the owner, the Australian Football League, by whom all copyright and other rights of reproduction are reserved. Australian Football League, AFL House, 140 Harbour Esplanade, Docklands, Victoria, Australia, 3008. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Inquiries should be made to the publisher. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Grand finals : the stories behind the premier teams of the Victorian Football League. Volume II, 1939-1978 / edited by Geoff Slattery. ISBN: 9781921778612 (hbk.) Subjects Victorian Football League--History. Australian football--Victoria--History. Australian football--Competitions. Other Authors/Contributors: Slattery, Geoff Dewey Number: 796.33609945 Group Publisher: Geoff Slattery Sub-editors: Bernard Slattery, Charlie Happell Statistics: Cameron Sinclair Creative Director: Guy Shield
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Precincts Statements of Significance February 2020
    Melbourne Planning Scheme Incorporated Document Heritage Precincts Statements of Significance February 2020 This document is an incorporated document in the Melbourne Planning Scheme pursuant to Section 6(2) (j) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 INCORPORATED DOCUMENT – SCHEDULE TO CLAUSE 72.04 Page | 1 Contents Precincts within the Capital City Zone .................................................................................................................. 5 1.0 Bank Place ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Statement of Significance .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Key Attributes ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2.0 Bourke Hill precinct..................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 What is Significance .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 How is it Significant ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Why is it Significant ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kearneyziebell Tarrant Ashmore
    Huddle 9. EMMA 7. JACK 10. KAITLYN 25. ROBBIE KEARNEY ZIEBELL ASHMORE TARRANT LEARN. GROW. BELONG. The Huddle is an award By 2021, The Huddle’s goal winning not-for-profit is to create opportunities organisation, established by the North Melbourne Football Club, Scanlon Foundation 100,000 and Australian Multicultural young people to learn, Foundation to help improve grow and belong. education and employment outcomes for young people. The Huddle respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the lands and waterways of the Wurundjeri, Wathaurong, Palawa and Muwinina Peoples. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging; and extend this respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, for they hold the memories and hopes of this land. To learn more about the culturally rich and diverse Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Countries and Clans, visit your local Land Council or Trust. Huddle CONTENTS Student Profile 2 How Do Wind Turbines Work? 10 Long Distance Roos 3 Powershop: Word Find 11 Spot The Difference 4 Footy Crossword 12 Welcome To AFL 6 Join The Dots 13 Kanga Bingo 7 Create Your Own Guernsey 14 Word Jumble 8 Tell Us About Your Team 15 The Stats That Matter 9 Answers 16 THE HUDDLE North Melbourne Football Club 204-206 Arden Street, North Melbourne VIC 3051 @HUDDLENMFC | HUDDLE STUDENT PROFILE Name: School: Year Level: Date of Birth __ /__ /____ Draw yourself here or paste a photo I live in: I live with: My family originally comes from: At home I speak: In the community I speak: With friends I speak: My favourite hobbies are: My favourite place is: My favourite place to hangout is: My favourite food is: 50.
    [Show full text]