DOCSLIB.ORG

Aerospace-Facts-And-Figures-1996

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aerospace-Facts-And-Figures-1996 Compiled by: Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. Director, Research Center David H. Vadas Manager, Economic Data Service David H. Napier Editorial Consultant James J. Haggerty Design Rings-Leighton, Ltd. Published by: Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1250 Eye Street, N.W., #1200 Washington, D.C. 20005-3924 FAX (202) 371-8470 For information about orders, call (202) 371-8561 For information about content, call (202) 371-8563 Copyright © 1996 by Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 International Standard Book No. 0898-4425 Air Transport Association of America Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company General Aviation Manufacturers Association Helicopter Association International International Civil Aviation Organization National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget U.S. Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis; Bureau of the Census; International Trade Administration) U.S. Department of Defense (Air Force; Army; Ballistic Missile Defense Organization; Comptroller; Directorate for Information, Operations, and Reports; Navy) U.S. Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) U.S. Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Airline Statistics) FOREWORD 6 AEROSPACE SUMMARY 8 AIRCRAFT PRODUCTION 26 MISSILE PROGRAMS 48 SPACE PROGRAMS 58 AIR TRANSPORTATION 74 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 100 FOREIGN TRADE 116 EMPLOYMENT 138 FINANCE 154 GLOSSARY 164 INDEX 171 AlA MEMBERS 176 nnovative engineering and quality manufacture are consistently on display in "U.S.-made" aircraft, space vehicles, and other aero­ space products in service around the globe. Exports-once a neg­ Iligible source of income- provide about one-third of all sales for U.S. aerospace manufacturers. Exports are also a significant source of jobs for U.S. aerospace workers-and workers in related industries. Despite years of painful adjustments to chang ed economic conditions, the U.S. ae rospace industry continues to look forward and to push the boundaries of technology and quality. The industry is poised to take full advantage of the growing commercial space market and the resurgence in demand for commercial aircraft. In the world marketplace of the nineties, U.S. aerospace products repre­ sent American industry at its best. he a_erospace ~ear 1995 was something of a paradox, a year of contrnued declrne in industry activity but at the same time a year of auspicious signals heralding improved business Tprospects in the years to come. J Analysis of the indicators prompted an Aerospace Industries Associ~tion (AlA) year-end statement that the long aerospace recessron was bottoming out, that the industry was in the early stages of a new business upturn, and that the activity curve was expected to continue upward. However, the expected business resurgence affects only one of the industry's three main areas of activity: civil aircraft manu­ facture. Government-funded activities in de­ fense and civil space will remain areas of uncertainty and provide only moderate levels of industry workload into the new century. In 1995, sales, earnings, and employ­ ment, the primary yardsticks of industry work­ load, were all substantially below the previous year's level. The aerospace work force was fur­ ther reduced by seven percent, to a level almost 40 percent below the industry employ­ ment peak of 1989. Aerospace exports and trade balance also declined, but the industry's performance in inter­ national trade was considered excellent in view of a generally depressed global market. The principal indicator of activity upturn was the flow of new orders in 1995. Total orders increased by roughly 20 percent over the previous year's level. That brought a slight (one percent) but very welcome increase in the industry's overall backlog, the first upturn in six years. However, the backlog was predominantly orders for civil systems, which constituted more than 60 percent of the total. Looking to the next decade, AlA sees sharply different levels of activity among its three principal workload areas. Defense is the most uncertain and most troublesome area. Defense procurement funding was still on a downward curve in 1995 and it was not expected to bottom out until Fiscal Year (FY) 1997. Funding for modernization of the downsized defense force has fallen victim to the dictates of reducing the national budget deficit, with the result that the main thrust of modernization pro­ curement has been deferred until FY 2000-2001. Since it often takes two to five (or more) years from the place­ ment of an initial order to delivery of an aerospace system, the industry will have to cope with the uncertainties of defense con­ tracting for some years to come. By the best scenario, we can expect to see in place by 2005 an adequately funded defense mod­ ernization program and a stable production effort of moderate scale. The space outlook is also mixed but on the whole optimistic. Administration projections contemplate continuing decline in gov­ ernment funding for civil space activities through 2000, but the out­ look is brighter for commercial space. Driven principally by rapidly expanding activity in satellite communications, commercial space has been growing at a 20 percent-a-year rate in the 1990s. Analysts expect continued growth. AlA believes that commercial space gains over the 1995-2005 decade will at least offset the indicated decline in government funding and that the net result will be a slightly climb­ ing curve. The brightest outlook among the industry's main workload areas is for commercial aircraft manufacture, where a consensus of industry projections indicates a total market of more than $1 trillion over the 20-year span from 1995 to 2015. From the standpoint of jetliner sales (which generally lag two to four years behind orders), AlA envisions the start of an upswing in 1996, followed by gradual annual increases. In the first decade of the new century, the indus­ try's output will reach record levels-levels that could eventually be as high as double the average for the past 20 years. When the industry is able to solidify the still-important defense element of its business and can officially declare the difficult period of industry transition ended, the industry that emerges will be quite different from the defense-oriented industry of the Cold War. The U.S. aerospace industry will be smaller, leaner, and more efficient; financially and technologically sound; driven primarily by commer­ cial rather than defense workload; and still the leader of the aero­ space manufacturing world. All that will happen only if our companies successfully manage the remaining transitional years, maintain their technological capa­ bilities, and continue to improve their collective competitiveness. The effective manner in which they have coped with a decade of transition inspires the belief that they will meet those challenges. Don Fuqua President Aerospace Industries Association n terms of sales, 1995 was one more year of decline for the aerospace industry-the fifth in a row when sales are calculated in inflation­ adjusted constant dollars. However, the industry experienced a large Iincrease in new orders despite continuing decline in military contract awards. Significant orders for commercial jetliners indicated that the re­ cession in the commercial transport sector had ended and that com­ mercial sales would turn up in the near future. Here is a breakdown of the industry's 1995 performance: Sales. Overall industry sales amounted to $1 06.3 billion, which compares with $110.6 billion in the previous year. Even after eight straight years of declin­ ing defense sales, the De­ partment of Defense (DoD) re­ mained the aerospace indus­ try's principal customer with more than 38 percent of total sales. Defense sales amount­ ed to $41.3 billion, down from $43.8 billion in the previous year. Sales to non-U.S. gov­ ernment customers came to $36 billion, down from 1994's $36.4 billion. As usual, aircraft sales predominated in a breakdown of sales by product group. Sales of aircraft, engines, and parts, civil and military combined, totaled $55.1 billion, or 52 percent of total sales; the figure compares with $57.6 billion in 1994. The aircraft sales total was compounded of $31 .1 billion for military aircraft and $24 billion for civil aircraft. The only product group to record an increase in 1995 was space systems, with sales of $27.3 billion or 25.7 percent of the total. Space sales were up slightly from 1994's $26.9 billion. Sales of missile systems, parts, and services continued on the downward trend in evidence since 1990, down to $6.3 billion from $7.6 billion in 1994. Sales of "related products and services" came to $17.7 bi llion, down from $18.4 billion. For 1995, aerospace industry sales amounted to 1 .5 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (down from 1.6 percent) and 3 percent of total sales by all U.S. manufacturing industries (down from 3.3 percent). Earnings. In 1995, the aerospace industry reported net income after taxes of $4.6 billion, down from $5.7 billion recorded in the previ­ ous year. Year-to-year comparability is difficult, however, because of the many factors that have impacted net income such as: company consol­ idations, accounting changes, tax adjustments, and lower rates of in­ vestment in R&D and plant and equipment. As a percentage of sales, the profit amounted to 3.8 percent, com­ pared with the average for all U.S. manufacturing industries of 5.7 per­ cent and with the industry's 1994 aerospace profit-to-sales ratio of 4.7 percent. As a percentage of assets, the 1995 figure was 3.5 percent, down from 4.3 percent in the previous year.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Embraer @ 50 Years of Wonder, Innovation & Success Page 14
    MANAGEMENT EMERGING TRENDS DUTIES AND TAXES OF GROWING AIR IN AERO ENGINE ON IMPORT/ PASSENGER TRAFFIC TECHNOLOGIES PURCHASE OF BA P 10 P 18 P 25 AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2019 `100.00 (INDIA-BASED BUYER ONLY) VOLUME 12 • ISSUE 4 WWW.SPSAIRBUZ.COM ANAIRBUZ EXCLUSIVE MAGAZINE ON CIVIL AVIATION FROM INDIA EMBRAER @ 50 YEARS OF WONDER, INNOVATION & SUCCESS PAGE 14 Embraer Profit Hunter E195-E2 TechLion at PAS 2019 AN SP GUIDE PUBLICATION RNI NUMBER: DELENG/2008/24198 OUT OF SIGHT. INSIGHT. In the air and everywhere. Round-the-clock service representatives, a growing global network, full-flight data, and an app that tracks your orders – solutions have never been more clear. enginewise.com PW_CES_EnginewiseSight_SPs Air Buz.indd 1 3/1/19 11:32 AM Client: Pratt & Whitney Commercial Engines Services Ad Title: Enginewise - OUT OF SIGHT. INSIGHT. Publication: SPs Air Buz - April/May Trim: 210 x 267 mm • Bleed: 220 x 277 mm TABLE OF CONTENTS EMBRAER / 50 YEARS P14 Embraer’s 50 years of MANAGEMENT EMERGING TRENDS DUTIES AND TAXES OF GROWING AIR IN AERO ENGINE ON IMPORT/ PASSENGER TRAFFIC TECHNOLOGIES PURCHASE OF BA WONDER, INNOVATION AND P 10 P 18 P 25 AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2019 `100.00 (INDIA-BASED BUYER ONLY) VOLUME 12 • ISSUE 4 SUCCESS Cover: WWW.SPSAIRBUZ.COM ANAIRBUZ EXCLUSIVE M A G A ZINE ON C IVIL AVIA TION FROM I NDI A What started as an aircraft EMBRAER @ 50 YEARS OF WONDER, INNOVATION & SUCCESS PAGE 14 Embraer Profit Hunter From turboprop to eVTOL, the five manufacturer to cater to the E195-E2 TechLion at PAS 2019 decades of Embraer’s journey have aviation needs of Brazil 50 years been nothing short of a fascinating ago, is the third-largest aircraft transformation manufacturer in the world today.
    [Show full text]
  • General Information Summary
    The purpose of the Dutch Safety Board’s work is to prevent future accidents and incidents or to limit their after-effects. It is no part of the Board’s remit to try to establish the blame, responsibility or liability attaching to any party. Information gathered during the course of an investigation – including statements given to the Board, information that the Board has compiled, results of technical research and analyses and drafted documents (including the published report) – cannot be used as evidence in criminal, disciplinary or civil law proceedings. GENERAL INFORMATION Identification number: 2007044 Classification: Serious incident Date, time1 of occurrence: 18 May 2007, 20.53 hours Location of occurrence: Groningen Airport Eelde (EHGG) Aircraft registration: OO-VLI Aircraft model: Fokker F27 MK50 (Fokker 50) Type of aircraft: Passenger Aircraft Type of flight: Scheduled passenger transport Phase of operation: Landing Damage to aircraft: Minor Cockpit crew: Two Cabin crew: One Passengers: Eleven Injuries: None Other damage: One runway edge light and a runway end light destroyed Light conditions: Daylight (sunset at 21.32 hours) SUMMARY A Fokker 50 made a flight from Amsterdam Schiphol Airport to Groningen Airport Eelde. After executing a visual approach to runway 05, the aircraft landed long (approximately halfway along the runway) and at high speed. The crew was unable to stop the aircraft within the remaining runway length. Subsequently, it ran off the end of the runway and came to a halt in the grass. None of the fourteen persons on board was injured. The aircraft sustained minor damage. This report is mainly based on information from the flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder and interviews with the flight crew members.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Flight Bag (EFB): 2010 Industry Survey
    Electronic Flight Bag (EFB): 2010 Industry Survey Scott Gabree Michelle Yeh Young Jin Jo U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration John A. Volpe National DOT-VNTSC-FAA-10-14 Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, MA 02142 Air Traffic Organization Operations Planning Human Factors Research and Engineering Group September 2010 Washington, DC 20591 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 22161 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Notice The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES September 2010 COVERED Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Communiqué De Presse
    Paris, 6th June 2017 PRESS RELEASE First Flight of Russian Aircraft MC-21 Nexeya supplies avionics integration and simulation tools Russia United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) successfully completed the maiden flight of their new MC-21- 300 commercial aircraft at Irkutsk Aviation Plant airfield. Being a modern aircraft, the MC-21 operates with numerous state of the art computer-controlled systems supporting safety-critical flight functions. While this may have been the first time its complex avionics systems have been tested in flight, they have been successfully integrated and tested on the ground thanks to TechSAT’s Avionics Development System ADS2 platform solution. This ADS2 platform enabled UAC Integration Center to test and validate the full MC-21 avionic suits prior to the first flight. Holistic tests including complex operational scenarios were performed during every phases of the design and development of the program ensuring maximum safety and superior performance of the aircraft. TechSAT (a Nexeya company) is proud to be part of the MC-21 program. «TechSAT solutions were designed and built on schedule; all test rigs were thus completed on time», says Victor SINITSYN, head of section at the UAC Integration Center. «ADS2 is a powerful, flexible, and stable product, to perform all required tests. ADS2 keeps its promises. ADS2 functionality is 100% reliable. TechSAT teams are open and skilled to meet customer needs». Marco Häde, TechSAT director of operations : «The key feature of TechSAT’s solutions for MC-21 simulation systems is the integration of all LRUs involved and the cockpit into a real hardware-in-the-loop setup.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Propeller Slipstream Effect on the Longitudinal Stability and Control
    Modelling the Propeller Slipstream Effect on the Longitudinal Stability and Control Thijs Bouquet Technische Universiteit Delft MODELLINGTHE PROPELLER SLIPSTREAM EFFECT ON THE LONGITUDINAL STABILITY AND CONTROL by Thijs Bouquet in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Friday January 22, 2016 at 1:30 PM. Supervisors: Prof. dr. ir. L. L. M. Veldhuis Dr. ir. R. Vos Thesis committee: Dr. ir. E. van Kampen TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Thesis registration number: 069#16#MT#FPP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis marks the conclusion of my time as a student at the faculty of Aerospace Engineering of Delft Uni- versity of Technology. This was no small feat, which could not have been done without the help of others, I would therefore like to express my gratitude. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors, Dr.ir.Roelof Vos and Prof.dr.ir.Leo Veldhuis, for their guid- ance, support and feedback throughout the past year. Secondly, I would like to thank Dr.ir.Erik-Jan van Kam- pen for being a part of my thesis committee. I would also like to thank my friends and colleagues for their support. A special mention has to be made for the students of ’Kamertje-1’, whose mutual goals created a sense of camaraderie which motivated me greatly. Finally, I would like to thank my family, who were never more than a phone call away to support and en- courage me throughout my entire education.
    [Show full text]
  • DESCRIPTION Fokker 50
    Fokker 50 - Power Plant DESCRIPTION The aircraft is equipped with two Pratt and Whitney PW 125B turboprop engines, which are enclosed, in wing-mounted nacelles. Each engine drives a Dowty Rotol six-bladed reversible- pitch constant-speed propeller. The engine is essentially a twin-spool turbojet combined with a free power-turbine assembly, which drives the reduction gearbox and propeller via a third concentric shaft. Engine layout Air intake The air intake is located below the propeller spinner. The intake has an anti-icing system. Combustion section The combustion section comprises an annular combustion chamber, fourteen fuel nozzles, and two igniters. Fuel control is through combined mechanical and electronic control systems. High pressure spool This spool comprises a centrifugal compressor and a single stage axial turbine. HP-spool rpm (NH) is governed by fuel metering. The spool drives the HP fuel pump and the lubrication oil pumps. Low pressure spool This spool comprises a centrifugal compressor and a single stage axial turbine. The LP spool is ungoverned; it is free to adapt itself to the operating conditions. LP-spool rpm is designated NL. To ease the gas flow paths and to minimize the gyroscopic moment, the LP spool rotates in a direction opposite to the HP spool and power-turbine shaft. Power turbine The two-stage axial power turbine drives the propeller via the reduction gearbox. The propeller shaft line is set above the engine shaft centerline. Propeller rpm is designated NP. The reduction gearbox also drives an integrated drive generator, a hydraulic pump, a propeller-pitch-control oil pump, a propeller overspeed governor, and the NP indicator.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Quick Guide for the IL76
    Ilyushin IL-76 About the airplane: 1 Country of origin: Russia Powerplants: 4 x 117.7kN (26,455 lb) Aviadvigatel Soloviev D30KP turbofans. The IL-76MF is powered by 4 x 156.9kN (35,275 lb) Aviadvigatel PS90ANs. Performance: IL-76T - Max speed 850km/h (460 kts), cruising speed 750 to 800 km/h (405 to 430 kts). Max range with reserves 6700 km (3615 nm), range with 40 ton (88,185 lb) payload 5000 km (2700 nm). IL-76TD - Speeds same. Range with max payload 3650 km (1970 nm), with 20 ton (44,090 lb) payload 7300 km (3940 nm). IL-76MF - Cruising speed range 750 to 780 km/h (405 to 420 kts). Range with 40 ton (88,185 lb) payload 5200 km (2805 nm). Weights: lL-76T - Max takeoff weight: 170,000 kg (374,785 lb). IL-76TD - Max takeoff weight: 190,000 kg (418,875 lb). IL-76MF - Operating empty weight: 101,000 kg (222,665 lb), max payload: 52,000kg (114,640 lb), max takeoff weight: 200,000 kg (440,925 lb). Dimensions: Wing span: 50.50 m (165ft 8 in), length: 46.59 m (152 ft 10 in), height: 14.76m (48 ft 5 in). Wing area: 300.0 m2 (3229.2 ft2). Il-76MF - Same except for length which is approx. 53 m (174 ft). Capacity: Flight crew of five members including two pilots, flight engineer, navigator and radio operator, plus two freight handlers. IL-76MP firefighting conversion can carry 44 ton (97,000lb) of fire retardant in two tanks. Production: Over 900 IL-76s of all models built, most for the Russian military, but over 300 are in service with Aeroflot and other civilian operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Fokker (Bedrijf) 1 Fokker (Bedrijf)
    Fokker (bedrijf) 1 Fokker (bedrijf) Fokker was de naam van een vliegtuigfabriek, vernoemd naar de stichter Anthony Fokker. Fokker raakte al vroeg in zijn jeugd geïnteresseerd in vliegen. Rond 1910 begon hij met de bouw van zijn eerste echte vliegtuig. Dit vliegtuig werd de "Fokker Spin" gedoopt. Hiermee werd Fokker op 21-jarige leeftijd beroemd toen hij op 31 augustus 1911 ter demonstratie rondjes rond de Grote Kerk van Haarlem vloog. Geschiedenis Anthony Fokker Eerste Wereldoorlog Voor het begin van de Eerste Wereldoorlog ging Fokker in Duitsland wonen waar hij een fabriek in Johannisthal bij Berlijn oprichtte. Later verhuisde de fabriek naar Schwerin. Het eerste bekende en succesvolle vliegtuig dat Fokker produceert was de Fokker Eindecker. Dit vliegtuig bezat als eerste de mogelijkheid door de bladen van de propeller heen te schieten zonder deze te beschadigen. Dit was mogelijk door een mede door Fokker uitgevonden mechanisme dat het machinegeweer blokkeerde wanneer er zich een propellerblad voor de loop bevond, het synchronisatiesysteem. Toen de Duitse regering Hugo Junkers en Een Fokker Dr.I Fokker tot samenwerking dwong, kwam Fokker in aanraking met dikke vleugelprofielen. Deze paste hij toe op twee andere zeer succesvolle vliegtuigen, de Fokker Dr.I Dreidecker en de Fokker D.VII. De Fokker Dr.I werd vooral bekend toen Manfred von Richthofen met dit type ging vliegen. Von Richthofen was de hoogst scorende luchtaas uit de Eerste Wereldoorlog met 80 neergehaalde vliegtuigen. Met zijn vuurrode Fokker Dr.I werd hij de nachtmerrie van de geallieerde piloten. Zijn bijnaam de Rode Baron had hij te danken aan de rode kleur van zijn toestel.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Short Courses Catalog
    AEROSPACE S HORT COU R S E S SPRING 2021 – SPRING 2022 Get ready for this year’s projects, refresh your knowledge and skills, earn a certificate and advance your career. Online Courses • Spring 2022 Schedule Free History of Airplane Design Webinars DEAR COLLEAGUES, LET OUR TEAM TRAIN travel costs and receive professional We hope this development uniquely tailored to YOUR TEAM ONLINE. message finds your team’s schedule and needs. you well. While You can learn where you work, take the last year has advantage of flexible delivery, train KU’sAerospaceShortCourse brought changes more people for less, or meet specific Programdeliversdependable and challenges, needs for small groups of employees. professionaltrainingwhere we know your need for KU Aerospace Short Courses stands youare.Trainasmallgroupor relevant, quality ready to meet your training needs, largeteamwithonlineshort professional training remains as whatever they may be. Whether coursesdeliveredrighttoyour necessary as ever. KU Aerospace you plan to attend a public course, organizationbyourexpert Short Courses remains committed want to register for a scheduled instructors.Selectthetopics to providing valuable, relevant course offering or engage your team professional development that meets in online learning right from their yourteamneedsmostandtake your needs. desks, visit our page at LPE.ku.edu/ advantageofflexiblescheduling aero-short-courses-home for a full thatreducestimeawayfrom Aerospace learning and instruction listing of available programs. work. is ongoing through a variety of platforms in 2021. In addition to our Rock Chalk, scheduled public courses this year in Why bring online learning to San Diego and Orlando, you can take your business? advantage of more online Aerospace Short Courses and free webinars than Sharon Graham •Competitivepricing ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Lider Firmy Rodzinnej
    ISSN 2353–6470 MAGAZYN FIRM RODZINNYCH Nr 7 (15), grudzień 2015 LIDER FIRMY RODZINNEJ DARIUSZ JASIŃSKI ALICJA HADRYŚ ‑NOWAK MAGDALENA DAROWSKA Prezes firmy i sędzia siatkówki. Liderki Ocena Projektu Lider? Firmy Rodzinne 2 FIRMAFIRMA RODZINNA RODZINNA TO TO MARKA MARKA2 SPIS TREŚCI FIRMAFIRMAFIRMA RODZINNA RODZINNARODZINNA TO TOTO MARKA MARKAMARKAFIRMA RODZINNA TO MARKA TEMAT NUMERU 4 Arkadiusz Zawada Folwark, delfiny i konie strzygące uszami 6 Wiesława Machalica Zostać przywódcą czy być zarządcą? iłość MMiłośćiłość RELACJE. Magazyn Firm Rodzinnych 8 Aleksandra Jasińska ‑Kloska MMMiłośćiłośćiłość M dwumiesięcznik, nr 7 (15), grudzień 2015 Stając się liderem. Nie tylko dla sukcesorów ISSN 2353–6470 10 Dariusz Jasiński wangarda biznesuWydawca: Prezes firmy i sędzia siatkówki. Lider? wangardawangarda biznesubiznesu Awangarda biznesu AAwangarda biznesu Stowarzyszenie AAAwangarda biznesu 11 Agnieszka Szwejkowska Inicjatywa Firm Rodzinnych ul. Smolna 14 m. 7 Lider i współczesne czasy – co jest możliwe? 00–375 Warszawa 12 Wojciech Popczyk ecepta na zmienną rzeczywistość ReceptaRecepta na zmiennąna zmiennąwww.firmyrodzinne.pl rzeczywistość rzeczywistość Kompetencje przywódcze przedsiębiorcyR rodzinnegoRReceptaeceptaecepta na nana zmienną zmiennązmienną rzeczywistość rzeczywistośćrzeczywistość R Redaktor naczelna: 14 Marietta Lewandowska Maria Adamska Czy liderowanie musi być trudne? Spojrzenie młodego pokolenia 16 Alicja Hadryś ‑Nowak reatywność Kreatywnośćreatywność Kontakt: KKreatywnośćreatywnośćreatywność K K Liderki K [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • To Our Shareholders in an Environment Where Challenges
    To our Shareholders In an environment where challenges abound, I’m proud to report the results and accomplishments of 2003. We’ve achieved these results in conjunction with a large expansion into regional jet aircraft. In spite of the challenges we maintained the integrity of our business model, provided value to our major partners through cost reductions and increased value to our shareholders. In summarizing the year, let me highlight some of our most significant achievements and successes. ¾ Added 36 net new 50-seat regional jet aircraft to the fleet ¾ Negotiated a new long-term agreement with United Airlines that was bankruptcy court approved ¾ Subsequent to year-end, negotiated an understanding with Delta Air Lines for rates and terms going forward ¾ Maintained an aggressive approach to cost reductions and containment in order to create value for our major partners and to remain competitive ¾ Reduced cost per available seat mile 11.4% $0.134 per available seat mile ¾ Negotiated a new purchase agreement with Bombardier Aerospace for additional regional jet aircraft and subsequent to year-end, increased the number of aircraft on firm order ¾ Added Continental Airlines as an additional code-sharing partner ¾ Financed all aircraft deliveries with long-term permanent lease or long-term debt and had no aircraft under interim financing arrangements at year-end I’m also happy to report that we were recently recognized for our outstanding quality wherein the U.S. Department of Transportation Air Travel Consumer Report named SkyWest Airlines as the number 1 carrier for on-time performance for calendar 2003. We added 36 net new 50-seat regional jet aircraft during the year.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSA Working Paper No. 22
    Numbered Soviet Aviation Factories, 1921–1941 Keith Dexter University of Warwick [email protected] PERSA Working Paper No. 22 Political Department of Economics Economy Research in Soviet Archives Version: 15 October 2002 Numbered Soviet Aviation Factories, 1921-1941 Keith Dexter World War 1 accelerated the growth of the Russian aviation industry which, towards the end of 1917 employed 10-12,000 people in 27 factories of which, 14 manufactured aircraft, 7 aeroengines, 3 propellers and skis, 2 electrical engine components and 1 aviation instruments. Sources differ from a minimum total of 21 to a maximum of 29 aviation factories but the figures quoted above seem sensible. All these facilities were privately owned. In addition, seven more plants were being built. However aircraft technology had not kept pace with the rest of Europe; all engines and 70% of airframes were still based on foreign designs. In spite of the civil unrest which erupted in 1917 1,099 aircraft and 374 engines were built. The Revolution and Civil War reduced these numbers in 1918 to 225 and 79 respectively and the upheavals wrought by the continuation of the Civil War ensured that only 668 new aircraft and 264 aeroengines were produced during that time; it is understandable that throughout this troubled period aircaft could not be given high prority. Nationalisation of the aircraft industry began slowly in January 1918 and continued until the end of the year at the earliest. In June 1918 Lenin signed a decree to extend the nationalisation to cover all means of production; a lengthy process and one fraught with many problems.
    [Show full text]