DOCSLIB.ORG

Case Studies from Temperate Climates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case Studies from Temperate Climates - Ecological Agriculture I - Earth Care, People Care, Fair Shares Rural and Urban Permaculture in the Context of Danish Society By: Marie-Ève Lépine Jessica Scott Eileen Leung Benno Hansen Supervisor: Dr John Roy Porter This project has been submitted in partial fulfilment of the SOCRATES European Common Curriculum 1 “What Permaculturalists are doing is the most important activity that any group is doing on the planet. We don’t know what details of a truly sustainable planet are going to be like, but we need options, we need people experimenting in all kinds of ways and Permaculturalists are one of the critical gangs that are doing that.” David Suzuki, 2002 –Hope Dance USA 2 Acknowledgements First of all we would like to thank the farmers and community gardeners who gave us their time through farm visits, interviews and even WWOOFing stays! Their generosity and patience has greatly contributed to our project. We wish you every success in your pursuit of sustainability. Thank you Karsten, Kirsten, Trina, Susanne, Carl, Allan, Marijke, Tony, Inga, Bent, Jørgen, and Knud Anker. Second, we would like to thank all the wonderful people who helped us out while we were hitchhiking around Denmark. Thirdly Jess, Benno and Eileen would like to thank Marie-Ève for all her beautiful drawings which have no doubt made the concepts of Permaculture much more tangible and our project much more interesting! Marie-Ève Lépine Jessica Scott Eileen Leung Benno Hansen Picture from the cover page “The great oval of the design represents the egg of life; that quantity of life which cannot be created or destroyed, but from within which all things that live are expressed. Within the egg is coiled the rainbow snake, the Earth-shaper of Australian and American peoples.” Mollison, 1988 3 Abstract Motivated by the need to develop new, more environmentally friendly and sustainable farming systems, the Permaculture (“Permanent Agriculture”) movement began in the 1970’s as an alternative farming strategy. Over time, the concept gathered momentum around the globe and has now grown to incorporate many aspects of “Permanent Culture,” not just food production. Permaculture, as it is today, has three main goals: “Earth-care, People-care and Fair-Shares.” The prime objective of this project was to analyse the Permaculture system, in a holistic and inclusive manner. To reach this goal, the project assessed the various aspects of Permaculture - discussing its origins with the theories and principles; moving onto on-site functional and design analyses; a qualitative review of Permaculture and its relevance to Urban and Peri-Urban agriculture (UPA); and then a broad discussion of Permaculture in the context of global food production history and philosophies. The final assessment considered the sustainability, feasibility and applicability of Permaculture in Denmark, through extensive reviews of Permaculture and Agriculture literature; on-site analysis and personal interviews. It was concluded that the Permaculture system is inherently “information and design intensive.” Adoption of the Permaculture ethos, in both rural and urban environments can lead to benefits in energy efficiency, closed nutrient cycling, ecological balance, reduced work and disturbance, and community development. These can all be sustained and enhanced in the long-term, and may be a real means of food production achieving true sustainability goals. However, Permaculture in Danish rural and urban environs is currently not well developed. The future success and extension of Permaculture, in Denmark, will not be limited by deficiencies in the Permaculture system itself, but rather by external factors, such as lack of political support, low community interest and other polemics of Denmark. 4 Table of Content INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................8 CHAPTER 1. REVIEW OF LITERATURE: THEORIES BEHIND THE PERMACULTURE CONCEPT ............................................................................11 1.1 The need for a New Agriculture - Righting the Wrongs............................................................. 11 1.1.1 Environmental Degradation and the Green Revolution............................................................... 11 1.1.2 Economic Challenges in Agriculture........................................................................................... 12 1.2 Definition of Agro-production Systems ........................................................................................ 13 1.2.1 Definition of Conventional Agriculture............................................................................................ 13 1.2.2 Definitions and Goals of Organic Agriculture ................................................................................. 14 1.2.3 Definitions and Goals of Permaculture........................................................................................ 14 1.3 The History of Permaculture......................................................................................................... 16 1.3.2 The Extension of Permaculture........................................................................................................ 16 1.4 The Permaculture Design Principles ............................................................................................ 17 1.4.1 Permaculture and Food Production.............................................................................................. 17 1.4.2 Zone Analysis.............................................................................................................................. 18 1.4.3 Energy Management (Sector Analysis) ....................................................................................... 19 1.4.4 Nutrient and Waste Management ................................................................................................ 20 1.4.5 Permanence in Agriculture .......................................................................................................... 20 1.4.6 Optimising Ecological Relationships........................................................................................... 21 1.5 The Permaculture System: Differences with Organic and Conventional......................................... 23 1.5.1 Earth-care, People-care and Fair-shares........................................................................................... 23 1.5.2 Permaculture and Community.......................................................................................................... 23 1.5.3 Permaculture, Organics and Certification........................................................................................ 23 1.6 Sustainable Agriculture and Permaculture.................................................................................. 25 1.6.1 Definition of Sustainability.......................................................................................................... 25 1.6.2 Permaculture as Sustainable Agriculture..................................................................................... 25 1.6.3 Why Can’t We Just Adopt Organic Farming?............................................................................. 26 1.7 The Success and Viability of Permaculture in Temperate Climates ................................................. 28 1.7.1 Isn’t Permaculture Best Suited to “Year-round” Growing Seasons? ............................................... 28 1.7.2 Case Studies from Temperate Climates....................................................................................... 28 1.8 Chapter Summary.......................................................................................................................... 30 CHAPTER 2. ECOLOGICAL DESIGN OF SMALL FARM SYSTEMS IN RURAL DENMARK...........................................................................................................31 2.1 General Overview ................................................................................................................................... 31 2.2 Methodology........................................................................................................................................... 32 2.2.1 Farm Visits and Data Collection...................................................................................................... 32 2.2.2 System Analyses and “Permaculture Criteria”................................................................................. 32 2.3. The Farm Systems ................................................................................................................................. 34 2.3.1. Bjørnbakhus..................................................................................................................................... 34 2.3.2. Søndermarksgård ............................................................................................................................. 39 2.3.3. Hegnstrup......................................................................................................................................... 48 2.3.4. Gule Reer ......................................................................................................................................... 55 5 2.4. Classification of Farms With Relation to Each Other........................................................................ 61 CHAPTER 3. PERMACULTURE IN URBAN AND PERI-URBAN AGRICULTURE .............................................................................................................................64
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sample Costs for Beef Cattle, Cow-Calf Production
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AGRICULTURAL ISSUES CENTER UC DAVIS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS SAMPLE COSTS FOR BEEF CATTLE COW – CALF PRODUCTION 300 Head NORTHERN SACRAMENTO VALLEY 2017 Larry C. Forero UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, Shasta County. Roger Ingram UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, Placer and Nevada Counties. Glenn A. Nader UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, Sutter/Yuba/Butte Counties. Donald Stewart Staff Research Associate, UC Agricultural Issues Center and Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis Daniel A. Sumner Director, UC Agricultural Issues Center, Costs and Returns Program, Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis Beef Cattle Cow-Calf Operation Costs & Returns Study Sacramento Valley-2017 UCCE, UC-AIC, UCDAVIS-ARE 1 UC AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AGRICULTURAL ISSUES CENTER UC DAVIS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS SAMPLE COSTS FOR BEEF CATTLE COW-CALF PRODUCTION 300 Head Northern Sacramento Valley – 2017 STUDY CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 ASSUMPTIONS 3 Production Operations 3 Table A. Operations Calendar 4 Revenue 5 Table B. Monthly Cattle Inventory 6 Cash Overhead 6 Non-Cash Overhead 7 REFERENCES 9 Table 1. COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF COW-CALF PRODUCTION 10 Table 2. MONTHLY COSTS FOR BEEF COW-CALF PRODUCTION 11 Table 3. RANGING ANALYSIS FOR BEEF COW-CALF PRODUCTION 12 Table 4. EQUIPMENT, INVESTMENT AND BUSINESS OVERHEAD 13 INTRODUCTION The cattle industry in California has undergone dramatic changes in the last few decades. Ranchers have experienced increasing costs of production with a lack of corresponding increase in revenue. Issues such as international competition, and opportunities, new regulatory requirements, changing feed costs, changing consumer demand, economies of scale, and competing land uses all affect the economics of ranching.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan Content
    2020 Business plan Content Preface .................................................................................. 3 Business strategy ................................................................... 4 Framework for Aarhus Vand ................................................... 8 Cooperation with Aarhus Municipality ................................... 10 Annual wheel 2020 .............................................................. 12 The Board ............................................................................ 13 Purpose, vision and core story ............................................. 15 Strategic partnerships strengthen us ................................... 16 Integrating the UN’s global goals for sustainability ................ 20 Aarhus ReWater – a trailblazer in resource utilisation ............ 22 Implementing a digital transformation ................................... 24 New ways of working with water .......................................... 27 Creating a strong corporate culture together ........................ 28 Organisation ........................................................................ 30 Sharpened focus on financing .............................................. 32 Financial forecast for 2020 ................................................... 33 Investment and tariffs ........................................................... 34 Lars Schrøder, CEO Aarhus Vand 2 PREFACE Welcome to Aarhus Vand’s business plan Welcome to Aarhus Vand’s business plan. The 2020, we will therefore experiment
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Thesis
    Master’s Thesis - master Innovation Science Aquaponics Development in the Netherlands The Role of the Emerging Aquaponics Technology and the Transition towards Sustainable Agriculture Mascha Wiegand 6307345 Tulpenweg 17 63579 Freigericht Germany [email protected] +49 1607561911 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ellen H.M. Moors Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development [email protected] +31 30 253 7812 Second Reader: Dr. Koen Beumer Summary A sustainability transition in the agri-food regime is urgently required to interrupt the strong reciprocal effect between current food production standards and climate change (Willett et al., 2019). One sustainable innovation in the agri-food sector is aquaponics. Aquaponics is the combination of hydroponics and recirculating aquaculture in one controlled environment (Somerville, Cohen, Pantanella, Stankus & Lovatelli, 2014). At first sight, the water and nutrient-saving character of aquaponics, amongst other features (Somerville et al., 2014), sound promising for a transition towards sustainable agriculture. Therefore, the following research question emerged: How can the emerging aquaponics technology contribute to the sustainability transition in the Dutch agri- food sector based on Dutch aquaponics developments in the period 2008-2018? To answer this overarching research question, three sub-questions were developed. An integrated framework combining the multilevel perspective (MLP) and the technological innovation system (TIS) was used to understand the dynamics between overall structural trends, the current Dutch agri-food sector and the emerging aquaponics innovation. The innovation was also set into a broader European context. The research was of exploratory nature and used a qualitative content analysis to process 23 interviews, scientific articles, practitioner websites, publication, patent and Google Trend statistics, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Permaculture Design Plan Alderleaf Farm
    PERMACULTURE DESIGN PLAN FOR ALDERLEAF FARM Alderleaf Farm 18715 299th Ave SE Monroe, WA 98272 Prepared by: Alderleaf Wilderness College www.WildernessCollege.com 360-793-8709 [email protected] January 19, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 What is Permaculture? 1 Vision for Alderleaf Farm 1 Site Description 2 History of the Alderleaf Property 3 Natural Features 4 SITE ELEMENTS: (Current Features, Future Plans, & Care) 5 Zone 0 5 Residences 5 Barn 6 Indoor Classroom & Office 6 Zone 1 7 Central Gardens & Chickens 7 Plaza Area 7 Greenhouses 8 Courtyard 8 Zone 2 9 Food Forest 9 Pasture 9 Rabbitry 10 Root Cellar 10 Zone 3 11 Farm Pond 11 Meadow & Native Food Forest 12 Small Amphibian Pond 13 Parking Area & Hedgerow 13 Well house 14 Zone 4 14 Forest Pond 14 Trail System & Tenting Sites 15 Outdoor Classroom 16 Flint-knapping Area 16 Zone 5 16 Primitive Camp 16 McCoy Creek 17 IMPLEMENTATION 17 CONCLUSION 18 RESOURCES 18 APPENDICES 19 List of Sensitive Natural Resources at Alderleaf 19 Invasive Species at Alderleaf 19 Master List of Species Found at Alderleaf 20 Maps 24 Frequently Asked Questions and Property Rules 26 Forest Stewardship Plan 29 Potential Future Micro-Businesses / Cottage Industries 29 Blank Pages for Input and Ideas 29 Introduction The permaculture plan for Alderleaf Farm is a guiding document that describes the vision of sustainability at Alderleaf. It describes the history, current features, future plans, care, implementation, and other key information that helps us understand and work together towards this vision of sustainable living. The plan provides clarity about each of the site elements, how they fit together, and what future plans exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Agricultural Science and Technology
    Career & Technical Education Curriculum Alignment with Common Core ELA & Math Standards Principles of Agricultural Science and Technology AGRICULTURAL CAREER CLUSTER CAREER MAJORS/CAREER PATHWAYS Animal Science Systems Agriscience Exploration (7th-8thGrade) - (no credit toward career major) Recommended Courses Principles of Agricultural Science & Technology Agriscience Animal Science Animal Technology Equine Science Adv. Animal Science Small Animal Tech Veterinary Science Elective Courses Ag. Math Food Science & Technology Food Processing, Dist. & Mkt. Aquaculture Ag. Sales and Marketing Ag. Construction Skills Ag. Power & Machinery Operation Agri-Biology Adv. Ag. Economics and Agribusiness Ag. Business/Farm Mgmt Ag. Employability Skills Leadership Dynamics Business Management Marketing Management * Other Career and Technical Education Courses Other Career and Technical Education courses directly related to the student’s Career Major/Career Pathway. “Bolded” courses are the “primary recommended courses” for this career major/career pathway. At least 3 of the 4 courses should come from this group of courses. To complete a career major, students must earn four career-related credits within the career major. Three of the four credits should come from the recommended courses for that major. NOTE: Agribiology is an interdisciplinary course, which meets the graduation requirements for Life Science. Agriscience Interdisciplinary course also meets the graduation requirements for Life Science. Agriculture Math is an interdisciplinary course, which may be offered for Math Credit. KENTUCKY CAREER PATHWAY/PROGRAM OF STUDY TEMPLATE COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY: CLUSTER: Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources HIGH SCHOOL (S): PATHWAY: Animal Science Systems PROGRAM: Agricultural Education REQUIRED COURSES CREDENTIAL SOCIAL CERTIFICATE GRADE ENGLISH MATH SCIENCE RECOMMENDED ELECTIVE COURSES STUDIES OTHER ELECTIVE COURSES DIPLOMA CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION COURSES DEGREE 9 Principles of English 1 Alegbra 1 Earth Science Survey of SS Health/PE Ag.
    [Show full text]
  • Cargill Premix & Nutrition: Transforming Talent Management
    Cargill Premix & Nutrition: Transforming Talent Management Michael Gunderson Associate Professor and Associate Director of Research Center for Food and Agricultural Business, Purdue University Wes Davis Graduate Assistant Center for Food and Agricultural Business, Purdue University This case was prepared by Michael Gunderson, associate professor and associate director of research, and Wes Davis, graduate assistant, Center for Food and Agricultural Business, Purdue University. The authors would like to thank Cargill Premix & Nutrition, particularly Heather Imel, vice president of human capital, Cargill Premix & Nutrition North America. The case is a basis for class discussion and represents the views of the authors, not Purdue University. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form without written permission from Purdue University. 2 | Cargill Premix & Nutrition: Transforming Talent Management © 2017 Purdue Univerisity In early 2016 Charles Shininger, managing director for Cargill Premix & Nutrition North America, takes part in a leadership meeting with other business unit managers and platform leaders at Cargill’s global headquarters in Minneapolis. Having just completed a successful quarter, he looks forward to reviewing the global enterprise’s performance and discussing business plans for the year. As the meeting begins, the global executive team of nine corporate officers discusses overall performance. Cargill has experienced declining annual operating earnings since 2011 (Exhibit 1). Some business units have performed well; however, changing customer preferences, political and regulatory uncertainty, macroeconomic challenges, and reinvented customer business models have eroded overall enterprise earnings and led the global executive team to consider what changes are necessary to reclaim performance. Exhibit 1: Over the last six years, operating earnings have been suppressed compared to FY 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3
    EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3 02 Editorial by the Danish Minister for European Aff airs 4 03 Why a Committee of the Regions? 6 Building bridges between the local, the regional and 04 the global - Danish Members at work 9 05 Danish Delegation to the Committee of the Regions 12 06 The decentralised Danish authority model 17 EU policy is also domestic policy 07 - Chairmen of Local Government Denmark and Danish Regions 20 08 EU-funded projects in Denmark 22 09 The 5th European Summit of Regions and Cities 26 10 Calendar of events 28 11 Contacts 30 EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions Editorial by the President of 01 the Committee of the Regions Meeting the challenges together We have already had a taste of Danish culture via NOMA, recognised as the best restaurant in the world for two years running by the UK’s Restaurants magazine for putting Nordic cuisine back on the map. Though merely whetting our appetites, this taster has confi rmed Denmark’s infl uential contribution to our continent’s cultural wealth. Happily, Denmark’s contribution to the European Union is far more extensive and will, undoubtedly, be in the spotlight throughout the fi rst half of 2012! A modern state, where European and international sea routes converge, Denmark has frequently drawn on its talents and fl ourishing economy to make its own, distinctive mark. It is in tune with the priorities for 2020: competitiveness, social inclusion and the need for ecologically sustainable change.
    [Show full text]
  • Cargill Non-GMO Solutions
    Cargill Non-GMO Solutions Cargill helps customers grow and protect their brands, and reduce time-to-market Non-GMO* is one of the Food category growth rates fastest growing claims in % growth of $ sales over prior year the U.S. food industry.1 12% 11% 11% A recent Cargill study showed that GMO is top 10% of mind when consumers are asked what they avoid when purchasing food. For over 15 years Cargill has helped customers navigate supply-chain challenges, source non-GMO ingredients, and grow their 2% non-GMO business. 1% 1% 1% 2012 2013 2014 2015 From dedicated producer programs to the industry’s broadest ingredient Total (+1% CAGR) portfolio, Cargill is the right Non-GMO Organic Natural (+11% CAGR) partner to help food and beverage manufacturers grow and protect Source: White Wave at 2016 CAGNY Conference their brands by delivering non-GMO products to consumers. 1 Source: Mintel, March 2016 Cargill.com/food-beverage Cargill markets the industry’s broadest portfolio of non-GMO ingredients. From sweeteners, starches and texturizers to oils, cocoa and chocolate, Cargill delivers the scale that food manufacturers need to get to market quickly and meet growing consumer demand. We offer a growing number of Non-GMO Project Verified ingredients so customers can feature America’s most recognizable non-GMO claim on their labels. Well-established producer programs for corn, soybeans and high oleic canola means unsurpassed supply chain assurance for our customers. Limited supply of non-GMO corn, soybeans and high oleic canola creates challenges for food and beverage companies seeking to scale production and meet growing consumer demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Aarhus
    European Union European Regional Development Fund MP4 Case study report Place-keeping in Aarhus Municipality, Denmark: Improving green space management by engaging citizens Andrej Christian Lindholst Forest and Landscape University of Copenhagen, Denmark May 2010 Aarhus, Denmark 2 MP4 WP1.3 Transnational Assessment of Practice Content Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Context ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Green spaces............................................................................................................................................ 3 Green space planning and management................................................................................................... 3 Green space maintenance ........................................................................................................................ 4 A ‘red’ circle ............................................................................................................................................. 5 The Project .................................................................................................................................................. 5 The park development plan .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Science LEVEL: Forms 4 & 5 TOPIC: AQUAPONICS
    SUBJECT: Agricultural Science LEVEL: Forms 4 & 5 TOPIC: AQUAPONICS CSEC Agricultural Science Syllabus SECTION A: Introduction to Agriculture 1. Agricultural Science and Agriculture Specific objectives: 1.3 Describe conventional and non-conventional crops and livestock farming systems (aquaponics, hydroponics, grow box, trough culture, urban and peri-urban farming) AQUAPONICS This a system that combines both aquaculture (rearing on fish inland) and hydroponics (growing of plants in water). Aquaponics = Aquaculture + Hydroponics A farmer can get two products from an aquaponics system: - Primary or main products are crops/ plants - Secondary product is the fish Parts of an Aquaponics System The main parts (components) of an aquaponics system are: 1. Rearing Tank – where the fishes grow 2. Growing Bed – where the plants are located 3. Water Pump and tubing – Pump is located at the lowest point of the system and used to push water back to the upper level. 4. Aeration system (air pump, air stone, filter, tubing) – to provide oxygen 5. Solid Removal/ sedimentation tank – to remove solid particles which the plant cannot absorb and may block the tubing etc. 6. Bio-filter – the location at which the nitrification bacteria can grow and convert ammonia to nitrates. 7. Sump – lowest point in the system to catch water. The pump can be placed here. Lifeforms in an Aquaponics system • Fishes • Plants • Bacteria These three living entities each rely on the other to live. Fishes Fishes are used in an aquaponics system to provide nutrients for the plants. These nutrients come from their fecal matter and urine (which contains ammonia) and other waste from their bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Handout for Introduction to Forest Gardening
    COURSE HANDOUT FOR INTRODUCTION TO FOREST GARDENING Complied by Jess Clynewood and Rich Wright Held at Coed Hills Rural Art Space 2010 ETHICS AND PRINCIPLES OF PERMACULTURE Care for the Earth v Care for the people v Fair shares PRINCIPLES Make the least change for the greatest effect v Mistakes are tools for learning v The only limits to the yield of a system are imagination and understanding Observation – Protracted and thoughtful observation rather than prolonged and thoughtless action. Observation is a key tool to re-learn. We need to know what is going on already so that we don’t make changes we will later regret. Use and value diversity - Diversity allows us to build a strong web of beneficial connections. Monocultures are incredibly fragile and prone to pests and diseases – diverse systems are far more robust and are intrinsically more resilient. Relative Location and Beneficial Connections – View design components not in isolation but as part of a holistic system. Place elements to maximise their potential to create beneficial connections with other elements. Multi-functional Design – Try and gain as many yields or outputs from each element in your design as possible. Meet every need in multiple ways, as many elements supporting each important function creates stability and resilience. Perennial systems – minimum effort for maximum gain Create no waste - The concept of waste is essentially a reflection of poor design. Every output from one system could become the input to another system. We need to think cyclically rather than in linear systems. Unmet needs = work, unused output = pollution. Stacking – Make use of vertical as well as horizontal space, filling as many niches as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Øresund Kattegat Skagerrak Cooperation Projects in Interreg IV A
    ConneCting Øresund Kattegat SkagerraK Cooperation projeCts in interreg iV a 1 CONTeNT INTRODUCTION 3 PROgRamme aRea 4 PROgRamme PRIORITIes 5 NUmbeR Of PROjeCTs aPPROveD 6 PROjeCT aReas 6 fINaNCIal OveRvIew 7 maRITIme IssUes 8 HealTH CaRe IssUes 10 INfRasTRUCTURe, TRaNsPORT aND PlaNNINg 12 bUsINess DevelOPmeNT aND eNTRePReNeURsHIP 14 TOURIsm aND bRaNDINg 16 safeTy IssUes 18 skIlls aND labOUR maRkeT 20 PROjeCT lIsT 22 CONTaCT INfORmaTION 34 2 INTRODUCTION a short story about the programme With this brochure we want to give you some highlights We have furthermore gathered a list of all our 59 approved from the Interreg IV A Oresund–Kattegat–Skagerrak pro- full-scale projects to date. From this list you can see that gramme, a programme involving Sweden, Denmark and the projects cover a variety of topics, involve many actors Norway. The aim with this programme is to encourage and and plan to develop a range of solutions and models to ben- support cross-border co-operation in the southwestern efit the Oresund–Kattegat–Skagerrak area. part of Scandinavia. The programme area shares many of The brochure is developed by the joint technical secre- the same problems and challenges. By working together tariat. The brochure covers a period from March 2008 to and exchanging knowledge and experiences a sustainable June 2010. and balanced future will be secured for the whole region. It is our hope that the brochure shows the diversity in Funding from the European Regional Development Fund the project portfolio as well as the possibilities of cross- is one of the important means to enhance this development border cooperation within the framework of an EU-pro- and to encourage partners to work across the border.
    [Show full text]