DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Energy Company Company SCALE TECHNOLOGY RESPONSIBILITY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Energy Company Company SCALE TECHNOLOGY RESPONSIBILITY Global Energy Global Energy Company Company SCALE TECHNOLOGY RESPONSIBILITY Rosneft is the Russian oil Rosneft is the champion Rosneft is the biggest taxpayer Annual report 2013 industry champion and the of qualitative modernization in the Russian Federation. world’s biggest public oil and innovative change in the Active participation in the Annual report 2013 and gas company by proved Russian oil and gas industry. social life of the regions hydrocarbon reserves Proprietary solutions to of operations. and production. improve oil and synthetic Creating optimal conditions Unique portfolio of upstream liquid fuel production for professional development assets. performance. and high standards of social Leading positions for oshore Establishing R&D centers security and healthcare for development. in a partnership with global the employees. Growing role in the Asia- leaders in technology Unprecedented program Pacific markets. development and application. for land remediation. ROSNEFT Scale Technology Annual report online: www.rosneft.ru Responsibility www.rosneft.com/attach/0/58/80/a_report_2013_eng.pdf OUR RECORD ACHIEVEMENTS 551 RUB BLN RECORD NET INCOME +51% Page 136 4,694 RUB BLN RECORD REVENUES +52% Page 136 85 4 ,873 RUB BLN KBOED RECORD DIVIDENDS RECORD HYDROCARBONS PAID IN 2013 PRODUCTION +80.3%* Page 124 Page 28 90.1 42.1 MLN TONS* BCM** RECORD OIL GAS PRODUCTION, REFINING VOLUMES RUSSIA’s third largesT References to Rosneft Oil Company, Rosneft, or GAS PRODUCER the Company are to either Rosneft Oil Company or Rosneft Oil Company, its subsidiaries and affil- +46% iates, as the context may require. References to * TNK-BP assets accounted for from the date TNK-BP, TNK-BP company are to TNK-BP Group. of acquisition. The information in this Annual Report 2013 is as Page 46 Page 64 ** Pro forma data. (TNK-BP assets accounted of December 31, 2013, unless otherwise stated. for starting January 1, 2013) Rosneft is the leader of Russia’s petroleum industry and the world’s largest publicly traded petroleum company. Rosneft activities include hydrocarbon exploration and production, upstream offshore projects, hydrocarbon refining, and crude oil, gas Annual REPort 2013 and product marketing in Russia and abroad. TABLE OF CONTENTS Message of the Chairman of the Board of Directors ...........4 Building International Business ............................74 Message of the President and the Chairman Science and Innovation ...................................80 of the Management Board .................................6 Occupational safety and Health, Industrial Safety, Efficient Development Strategy .............................8 and Environmental protection .............................88 Occupational and Industrial Safety Rosneft Geography of Operations ..........................10 Environment Protection Emergency Prevention and Response Financial, Operating and Sustainable Energy Efficiency Improvement and Energy Saving Development Highlights ..................................14 Corporate Governance ..................................100 Exploration and production ...............................18 Exploration and Reserves Replacement Employees and Social Responsibility ......................128 Crude oil production Company Team Hard-to-Recover reserves Social Policy and Charity Offshore Projects Development – Rosneft Financial Highlights ..............................136 in the Forefront of the World Energy Sector .................36 Financial Highlights Debt Portfolio and Credit Ratings Improving Efficiency of Contractor/ Effective Investment Governance Supplier Relations .......................................44 Appendix ..............................................142 Refining, Commerce and Logistics .........................46 Crude Oil Refining: Quality, Efficiency, Safety Additional Information .................................. 287 Efficient sales of oil, gas and refined products General Information about Rosneft Glossary Gas Business Development ...............................64 Сontact Information ANNUAL REPORT WITH INTEGRATED REPORTING ELEMENTS Visit our website: www.rosneft.com Rosneft’s Annual Report 2013 contains elements of integrated reporting as defined in the «International Integrated Reporting Standard» published by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). it aims to present Company financial results and achievements in the area of sustainable development, highlighting the existing relationships among the competitive environment, Company strategy, business model, risk management structure and a clear corporate governance structure. Since 2012, Rosneft has been part of the IIRC pilot program intended to clearly define international stan- dards of integrated reporting. MessaGE OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BoaRD OF DIRectoRS Dear shareholders, exploration program in the Arctic. It in- Board of Directors of OJSC Oil Company and financial policies in the areas of cluded, first of all, the entire complex of Rosneft, in pursuance of an assignment cost control, liquidity improvements, The 2013 results are further proof that scientific hydrological and meteorolog- of the Chairman of the Government timely debt repayment and dividend Rosneft remains the unfailing leader ical studies, analysis of ice conditions, of the Russian Federation, adopted distributi ons. Our Company’s successes of Russia’s oil industry, and a reliable exploration and appraisal. Concurrently, a resolution on September 29, 2013 in 2013 underpin the effectiveness of our source of revenues for the national Company management has been highly to acquire the common and preferred strategy, the relevance of our defined budget. Our Company has become successful in securing tax incentives for shares of an OJSC Oil Company Ros- priorities and suggest that one may notably more active in its international offshore and tight oil developments. neft subsidiary, OJSC RN Holding, by count on Rosneft’s sustainable develop- projects, confidently occupying leading sending to the shareholders of OJSC RN ment for the benefit of its shareholders positions on the global oil and gas Special note should be made of the Holding a voluntary proposal to acquire going forward. market. policy pursued by Rosneft management, all of the shares in their ownership. The under the leadership of Company CEO voluntary proposal was accepted by During the reporting period, Rosneft I.I. Sechin, which aims to build a system 7.195 private individuals and 208 legal closed a record number of major acqui- of long-term contracts. In 2013, Rosneft entities including international financial sitions in the areas of oil and gas pro- made record additions to the portfolio funds. As a result, OJSC Oil Company duction, oil refining, and infra structure of these contracts across all indicators – Rosneft has consolidated almost 100% facilities. As the result of these deals, in- this is true as regards the sheer number of the shares of OJSC RN Holding. For cluding 100% integration of the acquired of such contracts, but also supply the veteran shareholders who received TNK-BP assets, Rosneft has become the timings and volumes. Besides, the some TNK-BP shares upon initial offering world’s largest public oil and gas com- majority of long-term contracts provide at the time of privatization, a mechanism pany. Successful consolidation of these for advance payments which allows was offered for them to subsequently new assets has allowed our Company to the Company to conduct its business buy the shares of OJSC Oil Company achieve sizeable synergies. efficiently. Rosneft for the money they receive from the sale of their shares of OJSC Based on the results of the hydrocarbon In 2013, following the acquisition of RN Holding. The aforesaid mechanism reserves audit conducted by DeGolyer TNK-BP assets, Rosneft’s shareholding was also used by several hundreds of & MacNaughton, the Company confir- structure changed. OJSC ROSNEFT- people. The ongoing activities shall lead med its status of the world’s leading EGAZ, wholly owned by the govern- to the consolidation of 100% shares of public oil company in terms of proven ment, remains its major shareholder OJSC RN Holding in the ownership of hydrocarbon reserves and resources. (69.50%). Following the deal, 19.75% OJSC Oil Company Rosneft in 2014. Rosneft’s proven hydrocarbon reserves is held by BP, one of the oil majors, replacement ratio has come close to with another 10.75% being in free float. In 2013 Rosneft confirmed its status 287%* according to the SEC and the In 2013 and current year, Rosneft shares as a socially responsible company by Company’s proven reserves life is 19 were bought by Company CEO and signing a number of bilateral agreements years, including 16 years in oil and 36 Vice-Presidents and many top managers with 10 subjects of the Russian Federa- years in gas. Reserves replacement increased their shareholdings, which is tion aimed at creating favorable econom- was supported by, among other things, in line with the world’s best practices, ic, legal and institutional conditions for efficient exploration activities, which and broadcasts confidence in Rosneft’s the development of social infrastructure received investments of RUB 38 billion continued successful development and of the subjects, implementing social proj- in 2013. As a result of the completed shareholder value growth. ects on their territory, developing invest- program of exploration activity, 6 fields ment activity and meeting the demand in and 70 new deposits were discovered. Setting a high benchmark
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blowout in the Gulf: the BP Oil Spill Disaster and the Future of Energy in America
    UCLA Electronic Green Journal Title Blowout in the Gulf: The BP Oil Spill Disaster and the Future of Energy in America Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1ps043ht Journal Electronic Green Journal, 1(32) Author Ferrara, Enzo Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Review: Blowout in the Gulf: The BP Oil Spill Disaster and the Future of Energy in America By William R. Freudenburg and Robert Gramling Reviewed by Enzo Ferrara L'Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Italy Freudenburg, William R. and Gramling, Robert. Blowout in the Gulf. The BP Oil Spill Disaster and the Future of Energy in America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2011. 240 pp., 5 graphs. ISBN: 9780262015837.US$18.95, cloth. On April 20th 2010, eleven oil workers died as the Deepwater Horizon, a gigantic offshore plant rented by BP to drill deep in the Gulf of Mexico, exploded and, after burning for 36 hours, sank, causing an uncontrolled eruption of oil one mile below the sea level. Oil poured out at a rate of 56,000 barrels per day, until July 15th, causing one of the largest marine disasters in the history – second only to Saddam Hussein’s intentional opening the oil spigots as his forces retreated from Kuwait in 1991 – and frustrating the hopes of the Gulf residents, reassured in vain by BP and the government of a quick solution of the spill. Just like the complexity of its assessment, the magnitude and duration of the Gulf disaster were distinctive, due to its wide-reaching and prolonged impact in the region associated with the extensive use of dispersants.
    [Show full text]
  • Voronezh Tyre Plant Company Profile Company Name (Short): Vshz CJSC CEO: Valeriy Y
    Dear readers, The industrial policy pursued by the regional government is in close alignment with the Devel- opment Strategy of Voronezh region up to 2020. It has been approved after thorough consideration and negotiations with non-governmental organi- zations and professional experts. Thus, the region is in for radical system changes in the regional economy. The regional government is successfully develop- ing innovative system. The main directions of clus- ter development policy have been outlined, which increases the region’s competitive advantages and enhances connections between branches and in- dustries. The regional government has managed to create congenial investment climate in the region. The government is coming up with new ways of supporting Rus- sian and foreign investors, developing the system of subsidies and preferences. Innovative industrial parks and zones are set up. Their infrastructure is financed from the state and regional budgets. Voronezh region is one of top 10 in the investment attractiveness rating and is carrying out over 30 investment projects. All the projects are connected with technical re-equipment of companies and creation of high-technology manufac- turers. The number of Russian and foreign investors is constantly increasing. In the Catalogue of Industrial Companies of Voronezh Region, you will find in- formation on the development of industries in Voronezh region, structural and quality changes in the industrial system. Having read this catalogue, you will learn about the industrial potential of Vo- ronezh region, the companies’ production facilities, history and product range. The regional strategy is based on coordinated efforts, a constructive dialogue between private businesses, the government and non-governmental organiza- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVATEK RS Presentation
    “Harnessing the Energy of the Far North” Mark Gyetvay, Deputy Chairman of the Management Board Alexander Palivoda, Head of Investor Relations Goldman Sachs Global Natural Resources Conference London 11-12 November 2015 Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements in this presentation are not historical facts and are “forward-looking”. Examples of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: – projections or expectations of revenues, income (or loss), earnings (or loss) per share, dividends, capital structure or other financial items or ratios; – statements of our plans, objectives or goals, including those related to products or services; – statements of future economic performance; and – statements of assumptions underlying such statements Words such as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “estimates”, “intends”, “plans”, “outlook” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks exist that the predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not be achieved. You should be aware that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements When relying on forward-looking statements, you should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and events, especially in light of the political, economic, social and legal environment in which we operate. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any of them, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of Khanty Mansiysk
    Издательский проект Publishing project Международный институт проблем The international institute of problems of Международного института проблем The international institute of problems of устойчивого развития sustainable development устойчивого развития sustainable development ¿Í͉ËÚÓ‚‡Ì ÔË Œ„‡ÌËÁ‡ˆËË Œ·˙‰ËÌÂÌÌ˚ı Õ‡ˆËÈ Accredited by the United Nations ÃÂʉÛ̇ӉÌ˚È ËÌÒÚËÚÛÚ ÔÓ·ÎÂÏ ÛÒÚÓÈ˜Ë‚Ó„Ó ‡Á- The international institute of problems of sustain- »Á‰‡ÂÚÒˇ ÔË ËÌÙÓχˆËÓÌÌÓÈ ÔÓ‰‰ÂÊÍ Published with information support of the Ministry of For- ‚ËÚˡ (ûœ”–) ÔÓ‚Ó‰ËÚ ‡·ÓÚ˚ ÔÓ ÙÓÏËÓ‚‡Ì˲ ûƒ –ÓÒÒËË eign Affairs of Russia able development (IIPSD) carries out works on the for- ‚ –ÓÒÒËÈÒÍÓÈ ‘‰‡ˆËË Ì‡Û˜ÌÓ-ÏÂÚÓ‰ÓÎӄ˘ÂÒÍÓÈ √·‚Ì˚È Â‰‡ÍÚÓ Editor in chief mation in the Russian Federation of a scientific-method- ·‡Á˚, ‚ÌÛÚË„ÓÒÛ‰‡ÒÚ‚ÂÌÌÓÈ Ë ÏÂʉÛ̇ӉÌÓÈ ÒË- ÇÍÒËÏ ¿ÎÂÍ҇̉ӂ˘ ‘≈ƒŒ–≈ÕüŒ Maxim FEDORENKO ological base, the state and international system of co- [email protected] [email protected] ÒÚÂÏ ÒÓÚÛ‰Ì˘ÂÒÚ‚‡ ‰Îˇ ‡ÎËÁ‡ˆËË ÔÓ„‡ÏÏ ÛÒ- operation for the realization of programmes of sustain- –‰‡ÍÚÓ Editor ÚÓÈ˜Ë‚Ó„Ó ‡Á‚ËÚˡ. ¬ËÍÚÓ ¿ÎÂÍ҇̉ӂ˘ ÿÀ‹÷≈¬ Victor MALTSEV able development. [email protected] [email protected] Дирекция МИПУР Directorate of IIPSD ‡ÎËÁÛÂÚ ÒÚ‡Ú„˲ ûœ”– ̇ ÛÒÚÓȘ˂Ó Зарубежные представительства журнала Foreign representatives of the magazine, realizes the strategy of IIPSD on sustainable ‡Á‚ËÚË ‚ ÍÓÌÍÂÚÌ˚ı ÔÓÂÍÚ‡ı; ‡Á‡·‡Ú˚‚‡ÂÚ «Внешнеэкономические связи» и Международного ‘External Economic Relations’ and The International Insti development in concrete projects; develops института проблем устойчивого развития tute of sustainable development problems ÏÂı‡ÌËÁÏ˚ Ë ÔË‚ÎÂ͇ÂÚ ÚÂıÌÓÎÓ„ËË, mechanisms and involves the technologies Ó·ÂÒÔ˜˂‡˛˘Ë ÛÒÚÓȘ˂Ó ‡Á‚ËÚË √ÂχÌˡ: „.
    [Show full text]
  • “What Could Possibly Go Wrong?”
    “WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG?” SECRET DEAL ALLOWS COMPANY TIED TO SADDAM’S NUCLEAR BOMBMAKER, IRAN AND U.A.E. TO MANAGE KEY FLORIDA PORT FACILITIES An Occasional Paper of the Center for Security Policy By: Alan Jones and Mary Fanning 23 December 2016 1 Gulftainer’s Port Canaveral cargo container terminal (left), Saddam Hussein awarding a medal to Iraqi nuclear physicist Dr. Jafar Dhia Jafar, considered the “father of Iraq’s nuclear weapons program” (right) In 2015 President Barack Obama’s Administration quietly approved the hand-over of cargo container operations at Florida’s Port Canaveral to Gulftainer, a Middle Eastern ports company owned by the Emir of Sharjah of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Iraqi businessman Hamid Dhia Jafar. Hamid Jafar is the brother and the business partner of Dr. Jafar Dhia Jafar -- the Baghdad-born nuclear physicist who masterminded Saddam Hussein’s nuclear weapons program. UAE-based port operator Gulftainer, a subsidiary of The Crescent Group, was awarded the 35- year no-bid lease at Port Canaveral in 2014 following two years of secret talks in a deal code-named “Project Pelican.” Treasury Secretary Jacob “Jack” Lew declined1 to conduct a Committee on Foreign Investment (CFIUS) National Security Threat Analysis that, under the Foreign Investment & National Security Act of 2007 (FINSA), is required for transactions affecting America’s critical infrastructure and U.S. national security. Port Canaveral is in close proximity to a U.S. Navy nuclear submarine base, two U.S. Air Force Space Command bases, and NASA’s Kennedy Space Center. Gulftainer has port operations in the UAE, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Pakistan, Turkey, Brazil, and Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on IRC – R.O.S.T., the Registrar of the Company and the Acting Ballot Committee of MMC Norilsk Nickel
    Information on IRC – R.O.S.T., the registrar of the Company and the acting Ballot Committee of MMC Norilsk Nickel IRC – R.O.S.T. (former R.O.S.T. Registrar merged with Independent Registrar Company in February 2019) was established in 1996. In 2003–2015, Independent Registrar Company was a member of Computershare Group, a global leader in registrar and transfer agency services. In July 2015, IRC changed its ownership to pass into the control of a group of independent Russian investors. In December 2016, R.O.S.T. Registrar and Independent Registrar Company, both owned by the same group of independent investors, formed IRC – R.O.S.T. Group of Companies. In 2018, Saint Petersburg Central Registrar joined the Group. In February 2019, Independent Registrar Company merged with IRC – R.O.S.T. Ultimate beneficiaries of IRC – R.O.S.T. Group are individuals with a strong background in business management and stock markets. No beneficiary holds a blocking stake in the Group. In accordance with indefinite License No. 045-13976-000001, IRC – R.O.S.T. keeps records of holders of registered securities. Services offered by IRC – R.O.S.T. to its clients include: › Records of shareholders, interestholders, bondholders, holders of mortgage participation certificates, lenders, and joint property owners › Meetings of shareholders, joint owners, lenders, company members, etc. › Electronic voting › Postal and electronic mailing › Corporate consulting › Buyback of securities, including payments for securities repurchased › Proxy solicitation › Call centre services › Depositary and brokerage, including escrow agent services IRC – R.O.S.T. Group invests a lot in development of proprietary high-tech solutions, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Helicopters Experience and Innovation
    RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS EXPERIENCE AND INNOVATION © 2013 Russian Helicopters, JSC All rights reserved RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS AT A GLANCE Russian Helicopters, JSC is the sole manufacturer of “Mil” and “Kamov” civil and military helicopters. The company’s structure incorporates design bureaus, final assembly plants, components and parts manufacturers and service providers. Russian Helicopters consolidated the entire helicopter-building industry of Russia. We offer complete helicopter lifecycle from development to disposal. Russian Helicopters was founded in 2007 as a subsidiary of Oboronprom Corporation © 2013 Russian Helicopters, JSC All rights reserved FULLY INTEGRATED STRUCTURE Oboronprom TOTAL STAFF – 41,000 EMPLOYEES Russian Helicopters (98.5%) Mil Moscow Kazan Helicopters SMPP Helicopter Service Helicopter Plant (80.22%) (59.99%) Company (72.38%) (100.0%) Kamov Rostvertol Reduktor-PM (99.79%) (92.01%) (80.84%) Moscow and region NARP (9,000 employees) Kazan (95.1%) (6,500 employees) Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant (84.82%) Perm Progress Arsenyev (1,800 employees) Aviation Company Rostov-on-Don (93.14%) (7,900 employees) Kumertau Kumertau (4,000 employees) Novosibirsk Aviation PE (500 employees) (100.0%) Arsenyev (6,000 employees) Ulan-Ude (6,000 employees) © 2013 Russian Helicopters, JSC All rights reserved RUSSIAN HELICOPTERS AROUND THE WORLD Civil Total 37,530 Military Total 22,800 9% 91% 78% Civil Military Russian-made helicopters Key regions: account for nearly 14% of the Russia, CIS, India, China, Latin global fleet and are operated America,
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Moscow Exchange Index Review
    Notes on Moscow Exchange index review Moscow Exchange approves the updated list of index components and free float ratios effective from 16 March 2018. X5 Retail Group N.V. (DRs) will be added to Moscow Exchange indices with the expected weight of 1.13 per cent. As these securities were offered initially, they were added without being in the waiting list under consideration. Thus, from 16 March the indices will comprise 46 (component stocks. The MOEX Russia and RTS Index moved to a floating number of component stocks in December 2017. En+ Group plc (DRs) will be in the waiting list to be added to Moscow Exchange indices, as their liquidity rose notably over recent three months. NCSP Group (ords) with low liquidity, ROSSETI (ords) and RosAgro PLC with their weights now below the minimum permissible level (0.2 per cent) will be under consideration to be excluded from the MOEX Russia Index and RTS Index. The Blue Chip Index constituents remain unaltered. X5 Retail Group (DRs), GAZ (ords), Obuvrus LLC (ords) and TNS energo (ords) will be added to the Broad Market Index, while Common of DIXY Group and Uralkali will be removed due to delisting expected. TransContainer (ords), as its free float sank below the minimum threshold of 5 per cent, and Southern Urals Nickel Plant (ords), as its liquidity ratio declined, will be also excluded. LSR Group (ords) will be incuded into SMID Index, while SOLLERS and DIXY Group (ords) will be excluded due to low liquidity ratio. X5 Retail Group (DRs) and Obuvrus LLC (ords) will be added to the Consumer & Retail Index, while DIXY Group (ords) will be removed from the Index.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatham House Corporate Members
    CHATHAM HOUSE CORPORATE MEMBERS Partners AIG Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.a. Asfari Foundation JETRO London Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Leonardo S.p.a BP plc MAVA Foundation Carnegie Corporation of New York Ministry of Defence, UK Chevron Ltd Nippon Foundation Clifford Chance LLP Open Society Foundations Crescent Petroleum Robert Bosch Stiftung Department for International Development, UK Royal Dutch Shell European Commission Statoil ExxonMobil Corporation Stavros Niarchos Foundation Foreign & Commonwealth Office, UK Major Corporate Members AIA Group KPMG LLP Anadarko Kuwait Petroleum Corporation BAE Systems plc LetterOne Bank of America Merrill Lynch Liberty Global BV Barclays Linklaters Bayer Lockheed Martin UK BBC Makuria Investment Management BHP Mitsubishi Corporation Bloomberg Morgan Stanley BNP Paribas MS Amlin British Army Nomura International plc Brown Advisory Norinchukin Bank BT Group plc PricewaterhouseCoopers Caxton Asset Management Rabobank Casey Family Programs Rio Tinto plc Citi Royal Bank of Scotland City of London S&P Global CLP Holdings Limited Santander Control Risks Saudi Center for International and Strategic Partnerships Credit Suisse Saudi Petroleum Overseas Ltd Deloitte Schlumberger Limited Department for International Trade, UK Société Générale Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), The Standard Chartered Bank Diageo Stroz Friedberg Eni S.p.A. Sumitomo Corporation Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Telstra Gardaworld The Economist GlaxoSmithKline Thomson Reuters Goldman Sachs International Toshiba Corporation
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia's Largest Public Companies
    An Overview Of Boards Of Directors At Russia’s Largest Public Companies Andrei Rakitin Milena Barsukova Arina Mazunova Translated from Russian August 2020 Key Results According to information disclosed by 109 of Russia’s largest public companies: “Classic” board compositions of 11, nine, and seven seats prevail The total number of persons on Boards of the companies under study is not as low as it might seem: 89% of all Directors were elected to only one such Board Female Directors account for 12% and are more often elected to the audit, nomination, and remuneration committees than to the strategy committee Among Directors, there are more “humanitarians” than “techies,” while the share of “techies” among chairs is greater than across the whole sample The average age for Directors is 53, 56 for Chairmen, and 58 for Independent Directors Generation X is the most visible on Boards, and Generation Y Directors will likely quickly increase their presence if the impetuous development of digital technologies continues The share of Independent Directors barely reaches 30%, and there is an obvious lack of independence on key committees such as audit Senior Independent Directors were elected at 17% of the companies, while 89% of Chairs are not independent The average total remuneration paid to the Board of Directors is RUR 69 million, with the difference between the maximum and minimum being 18 times Twenty-four percent of the companies disclosed information on individual payments made to their Directors. According to this, the average total remuneration is approximately RUR 9 million per annum for a Director, RUR 17 million for a Chair, and RUR 11 million for an Independent Director The comparison of 2020 findings with results of a similar study published in 2012 paints an interesting dynamic picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7. Cities of the Russian North in the Context of Climate Change
    ? chapter seven Cities of the Russian North in the Context of Climate Change Oleg Anisimov and Vasily Kokorev Introduction In addressing Arctic urban sustainability, one has to deal with the com- plex interplay of multiple factors, such as governance and economic development, demography and migration, environmental changes and land use, changes in the ecosystems and their services, and climate change.1 While climate change can be seen as a factor that exacerbates existing vulnerabilities to other stressors, changes in temperatures, precipitation, snow accumulation, river and lake ice, and hydrological conditions also have direct implications for Northern cities. Climate change leads to a reduction in the demand for heating energy, on one hand, and heightens concerns about the fate of the infrastruc- ture built upon thawing permafrost, on the other. Changes in snowfall are particularly important and have direct implications for the urban economy, because, together with heating costs, expenses for snow removal from streets, airport runways, roofs, and ventilation spaces underneath buildings standing on pile foundations built upon perma- frost constitute the bulk of a city’s maintenance budget during the long cold period of the year. Many cities are located in river valleys and are prone to fl oods that lead to enormous economic losses, inju- ries, and in some cases human deaths. The severity of the northern climate has a direct impact on the regional migration of labor. Climate could thus potentially be viewed as an inexhaustible public resource that creates opportunities for sustainable urban development (Simp- 142 | Oleg Anisimov and Vasily Kokorev son 2009). Long-term trends show that climate as a resource is, in fact, becoming more readily available in the Russian North, notwith- standing the general perception that globally climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing humanity in the twenty-fi rst century.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials) Provided to Shareholders in Preparation for the Annual General Shareholders’ Meeting of Pjsc Gazprom in 2018
    INFORMATION (MATERIALS) PROVIDED TO SHAREHOLDERS IN PREPARATION FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING OF PJSC GAZPROM IN 2018 Saint Petersburg, 2018 2 List of information (materials) provided to shareholders in preparation for the annual General Shareholders’ Meeting of PJSC GAZPROM 1. Announcement of the annual General Shareholders’ Meeting of PJSC GAZPROM. 2. PJSC GAZPROM Annual Report for 2017 and Annual Accounts (Financial Statements) for 2017, including the Auditor’s Report. 3. Report on PJSC GAZPROM related party transactions made in 2017. 4. Opinion of PJSC GAZPROM Audit Commission on reliability of data contained in PJSC GAZPROM Annual Report for 2017, Annual Accounts (Financial Statements) for 2017 and in the Report on PJSC GAZPROM related party transactions made in 2017. 5. Review of PJSC GAZPROM Auditor’s Report by the Audit Committee of PJSC GAZPROM Board of Directors. 6. Profit allocation recommendations of PJSC GAZPROM Board of Directors, in particular, the amount, timing and form of payment of the annual dividends on the Company’s shares and the date, as of which the persons entitled to the dividends are determined. 7. Information on the candidacy for PJSC GAZPROM Auditor. 8. Proposals on the amount of remuneration to members of PJSC GAZPROM Board of Directors. 9. Proposals on the amount of remuneration to members of PJSC GAZPROM Audit Commission. 10. Draft Amendments to the Regulation of General Shareholders’ Meeting of PJSC GAZPROM and the comparative table of amendments thereto vs the current version. 11. Information on candidates to PJSC GAZPROM Board of Directors, in particular, on the availability of their consent to be elected.
    [Show full text]