Department of the Navy Fiscal Year 2016 Annual Financial Report MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION and ANALYSIS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of the Navy Fiscal Year 2016 Annual Financial Report MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION and ANALYSIS AMERICA’S AWAY TEAM TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Secretary of the Navy 2 Message from the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management & Comptroller) 3 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 5 Department of the Navy Audit Opinions 47 Department of the Navy Principal Statements 59 Department of the Navy Required Supplementary Stewardship Information 95 Department of the Navy Required Supplementary Information 101 Department of the Navy Other Information 109 Navy Working Capital Fund Audit Opinions 113 Navy Working Capital Fund Principal Statements 123 Navy Working Capital Fund Required Supplementary Information 147 Navy Working Capital Fund Other Information 149 Appendix 151 SECRETARY OF THE NAVY NOVEMBER 2016 The Department of the Navy fervently continues its mission to maintain, train, and equip combat-ready naval forces capable of winning wars, deterring aggression, and maintaining freedom of the seas. United States Sailors and Marines are "America’s Away Team," deploying around the world in times of peace and war to be at the right place all the time, ready and able to respond when called upon. This presence includes deploying forces, building global partnerships, and conducting routine deployments. Four fundamental principles have guided me as Secretary of the Navy in sustaining this global presence: People, Platforms, Power, and Partnerships. People – Sustaining the World’s Most Formidable Expeditionary Fighting Force: Our Sailors, Marines, and civilians all contribute to executing the mission of the DON. We must ensure we’re able to recruit and retain the best and most capable people. To do this, we have expanded meritorious advancements, improved the Career Intermission Program, increased maternity leave, and are opening all billets to every member of the Navy and Marine Corps. The opportunities we provide to the warfighter are investments in sustainment of the world’s most formidable expeditionary fighting force. Platforms – Growing Our Fleet Despite Shrinking Budgets: Platforms enable our people to perform their mission. Having the right number of ships, submarines, and aircraft is critical. Since 2009 we have reversed the decline in United States Sailors shipbuilding. We will have a 300 ship fleet by the end of the decade, despite budget constraints, while continuing to invest in next generation innovations. and Marines are Power – Alternative Energy Fueling the Fight: The Navy has a history of energy innovation, advancing from sail, to coal, to oil, and to nuclear power. "America’s Away This year we launched the Great Green Fleet 2016, steaming on a blend of conventional and alternative fuels. Additionally, during this fiscal year, the Team," deploying DON completed procurement of one gigawatt of alternative energy for shore bases. The use of alternative energies at sea and ashore improves security around the world and advances stability for our fighting forces. in times of peace Partnerships – Building Partnerships to Advance our Shared Values: Partnerships with the American people, our allies, foreign partners, and industry and war to be at allow us to carry out our mission. Joint exercises improve interoperability with foreign navies, building understanding and trust. Improved procurement of the right place all long-lead items such as ships provides stability to our nation’s industrial base. Most critically, we partner with the American people to provide for the future the time. of naval security. Despite ever-tightening fiscal constraints, the DON continues to provide the nation with a strong global presence. As stewards of resources entrusted to us by Congress on behalf of the American people, we are aggressively pursuing the Congressional mandate to improve the reliability of our financial data and achieve audit readiness. The DON’s Fiscal Year 2016 Annual Financial Report, "America’s Away Team," conveys this commitment to, and our partnership with, the American People. Detailed discussion of identified weaknesses and ongoing remediation efforts are disclosed in the DON Statement of Assurance and within the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section. 2 ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT & COMPTROLLER NOVEMBER 2016 I am pleased to present the Department of the Navy’s (DON) 2016 Annual Financial Report, America’s Away Team, reflecting the hard work performed by Sailors, Marines, and civil servants in executing the Department’s mission. Deploying in times of peace and in times of ensuring they are where it matters, when it matters, our people are the most critical component to success as an organization. Despite shrinking budgets, the DON financial community is working to ensure that resources are efficiently executed to support the needs of the Department today. We are focused on planning for the fiscal future to enable the DON to achieve its objectives: to protect the homeland, build global security, project power and win decisively when called upon. This requires making hard choices to focus investments while continuing to innovate. In an environment of budget constraints and instability, we must protect procurement of long lead items such as ships and aircraft while simultaneously maintaining a high operating tempo. We remain committed to ensuring budget requests balance mission readiness, sustaining the world’s most formidable expeditionary fighting force. We are focused on Financial improvement and audit readiness continue to be important elements of DON financial operations. After years of preparation, the Navy shifted from planning for the preparing for audit to being under audit in FY 2015 marking a significant milestone on our path to a full financial statement audit. I have observed fiscal future to enable the rapidly increasing pace of learning as Navy meets the demands of audit, including creation of an effective audit response network and aggressive the DON to achieve remediation of findings, eliminating root causes, not simply resolving the symptoms. While complex long-standing issues are being resolved through its objectives. diligence and hard work, much work remains. As we drive toward full financial statement audit, the DON’s civilian and military leadership demonstrate their enduring commitment to be accountable to Congress and the American people for sound stewardship of the funds entrusted to them and along with it, greater accountability, transparency, and efficiency. Leadership Messages 3 4 Department of the Navy Fiscal Year 2016 Annual Financial Report MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS America’s Away Team Management’s Discussion and Analysis Management’s 5 (U S Navy photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Nathan Burke/Released) AMERICA’S AWAY TEAM OVERVIEW The Department of Defense (DoD) includes three military departments (Department of the Army, Department of the Navy, and Department of the Air Force); however, there are four separate service branches (Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force). Since 1834, the Navy and Marine Corps have been housed together under the Department of the Navy (DON). The Department of the Navy was established on April 30, 1798. The DON has three principal components: the Navy Department, consisting of executive offices mostly in Washington, DC; the operating forces, including the Marine Corps, the reserve components, and, in time of war, the U.S. Coast Guard (in peace, a component of the Department of Homeland Security); and the shore establishment. The Department of the Navy consists of two uniformed Services: the United States Navy and the United States Marine Corps. The United States Navy was founded on October 13, 1775. The Navy’s core responsibilities are to deter aggression and, if deterrence fails, win the nation’s wars. The Navy employs the global reach and persistent presence of forward-stationed and rotational forces to secure the nation from direct attack, assure Joint operational access, and retain global freedom of action. Along with global partners, the Navy protects the maritime freedom that is the basis for global prosperity and fosters and sustains cooperative relationships with an expanding set of allies and international partners to enhance global security. The United States Marine Corps (USMC) was founded by an act of the Continental Congress on November 10, 1775. As the nation’s Expeditionary Force in Readiness, the Marine Corps provides power projected from the sea, utilizing the mobility of the Navy to rapidly deliver combined-arms task forces in coastal regions or emergent global crises. The Marine Corps has evolved into a balanced air-ground task force with significant logistical capabilities to forward deployed and forward engaged areas shaping, training, deterring, and responding to all manner of crises and contingencies. The Department of the Navy Annual Financial Report (AFR) includes two separate sets of financial statements, the DON General Fund (GF) and the Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF). The DON GF accounts for appropriations and funds as general, working capital (revolving), trust, special, and deposit funds. The DON uses these funds (excluding deposit funds) to execute its mission. The National Defense Sealift Fund is the only 6 Department of the Navy Fiscal Year 2016 Annual Financial Report AMERICA’S AWAY TEAM revolving fund within DON GF and receives an annual appropriation. The DON GF is comprised of those federal account symbols beginning with agency number 17 within the United States Treasury’s Federal Account Symbols and Titles (FAST) Book. The NWCF is a revolving fund that provides
Recommended publications
  • 2014 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
    AIRCRAFT CARRIER DDG 1000 AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) THE U.S. NAvy’s next-GENERATION MULTI-MISSION DESTROYER Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN Tarawa Class LHA Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 USS Peleliu LHA-5 John F. Kennedy CVN-79 Enterprise CVN-80 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S. Truman CVN-75 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C. Stennis CVN-74 USS George H.W. Bush CVN-77 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 SUBMARINE Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) America Class LHA America LHA-6 SURFACE COMBATANT Los Angeles Class SSN Tripoli LHA-7 USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Pittsburgh SSN-720 USS Albany SSN-753 USS Santa Fe SSN-763 Guided Missile Cruiser USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Chicago SSN-721 USS Topeka SSN-754 USS Boise SSN-764 USS Dallas SSN-700 USS Key West SSN-722 USS Scranton SSN-756 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS La Jolla SSN-701 USS Oklahoma City SSN-723 USS Alexandria SSN-757 USS Charlotte SSN-766 Ticonderoga Class CG USS City of Corpus Christi SSN-705 USS Louisville SSN-724 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Albuquerque SSN-706 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Hartford SSN-768 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Princeton CG-59 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Lake Erie CG-70 USS San Francisco SSN-711 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Toledo SSN-769 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Normandy CG-60 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Cape St.
    [Show full text]
  • Navies and Soft Power Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force NEWPORT PAPERS
    NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS 42 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE WAR NAVAL Navies and Soft Power Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force NEWPORT PAPERS NEWPORT 42 Bruce A. Elleman and S. C. M. Paine, Editors U.S. GOVERNMENT Cover OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE The April 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil-rig fire—fighting the blaze and searching for survivors. U.S. Coast Guard photograph, available at “USGS Multimedia Gallery,” USGS: Science for a Changing World, gallery.usgs.gov/. Use of ISBN Prefix This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its au thenticity. ISBN 978-1-935352-33-4 (e-book ISBN 978-1-935352-34-1) is for this U.S. Government Printing Office Official Edition only. The Superinten- dent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. Legal Status and Use of Seals and Logos The logo of the U.S. Naval War College (NWC), Newport, Rhode Island, authenticates Navies and Soft Power: Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force, edited by Bruce A. Elleman and S. C. M. Paine, as an official publica tion of the College. It is prohibited to use NWC’s logo on any republication of this book without the express, written permission of the Editor, Naval War College Press, or the editor’s designee. For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-00001 ISBN 978-1-935352-33-4; e-book ISBN 978-1-935352-34-1 Navies and Soft Power Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force Bruce A.
    [Show full text]
  • NAVAL ENERGY FORUM Creating Spartan Energy Warriors: Our Competitive Advantage
    PROMOTING NATIONAL SECURITY SINCE 1919 NAVAL ENERGY FORUM Creating Spartan Energy Warriors: Our Competitive Advantage FORUM HIGHLIGHTS: u Keynote Addresses by Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Jonathan Greenert, Admiral John C. Harvey, and other Distinguished Guests u Presentations on importance of culture change, successes/challenges for our fleet and shore infrastructure, investments in alternative fuels, information systems, energy efficient acquisition, and game changing solutions u Special remarks by Mr. Jim Hornfischer, New York Times bestselling author OCTOBER 13-14, 2011 RONALD REAGAN BUILDING & ITC u WASHINGTON, DC WWW.GREENFLEET.DODLIVE.MIL/ENERGY WWW.NDIA.ORG/MEETINGS/2600 A WELCOME MESSAGE Welcome to the 2011 Naval Energy Forum. wars, deterring aggression, and maintaining freedom of the seas. That Since I announced the Navy’s energy goals is why avoiding these fuel price spikes and elevations is essential to the at this forum two years ago, we have Navy’s core mission, and why developing alternative fuels is a priority. We made remarkable progress in our efforts have already seen a return on our investments in more efficient energy to achieve greater energy security for the use. Last year, we launched the first hybrid ship in the Navy, the USS Navy and the nation. I am committed to Makin Island. In its maiden voyage, the Makin Island saved almost $2 positioning our Naval forces for tomorrow’s million in fuel costs. Over the lifetime of the ship, we can save $250 challenges, and changing the way the million at last year’s fuel prices. Department of the Navy uses, produces, and acquires energy is one of our greatest We also continue to make progress in our efforts to test and certify all challenges because it is also one of our of our aircraft and ships on drop-in biofuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • Global Health Engagement Features Joint Doctrine by Gerald V
    Issue 80, 1st Quarter 2016 JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Global Health ISSUE EIGHTY, 1 Engagement ST Inside U.S. Cyber Command QUARTER 2016 American Wolf Packs Joint Force Quarterly Founded in 1993 • Vol. 80, 1st Quarter 2016 http://ndupress.ndu.edu Gen Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., USMC, Publisher MajGen Frederick M. Padilla, USMC, President, NDU Editor in Chief Col William T. Eliason, USAF (Ret.), Ph.D. Executive Editor Jeffrey D. Smotherman, Ph.D. Production Editor John J. Church, D.M.A. Internet Publications Editor Joanna E. Seich Copyeditor Erin L. Sindle Book Review Editor Frank G. Hoffman, Ph.D. Art Director Marco Marchegiani, U.S. Government Printing Office Advisory Committee COL Michael S. Bell, USA (Ret.), Ph.D./College of International Security Affairs; LTG Robert B. Brown, USA/U.S. Army Command and General Staff College; Brig Gen Christopher A. Coffelt, USAF/Air War College; Col Keil Gentry, USMC/Marine Corps War College; BGen Thomas A. Gorry, USMC/Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy; Col Steven J. Grass, USMC/Marine Corps Command and Staff College; Brig Gen Darren E. Hartford, USAF/National War College; Col Brian E. Hastings, USAF/Air Command and Staff College; RADM P. Gardner Howe III/U.S. Naval War College; LTG William C. Mayville, Jr., USA/The Joint Staff; MG William E. Rapp, USA/U.S. Army War College; LtGen Thomas D. Waldhauser, USMC/The Joint Staff; RDML Brad Williamson/Joint Forces Staff College Editorial Board Richard K. Betts/Columbia University; Stephen D. Chiabotti/School of Advanced Air and Space Studies; Eliot A.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Back the Seas Transforming the U.S
    TAKING BACK THE SEAS TRANSFORMING THE U.S. SURFACE FLEET FOR DECISION-CENTRIC WARFARE BRYAN CLARK TIMOTHY A. WALTON TAKING BACK THE SEAS TRANSFORMING THE U.S. SURFACE FLEET FOR DECISION-CENTRIC WARFARE BRYAN CLARK TIMOTHY A. WALTON 2019 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2019 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Bryan Clark is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. At CSBA he has led studies in naval warfare, electromagnetic warfare, precision strike, and air defense. In response to the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act, he led one of three Navy fleet architec- ture studies that assessed the Navy’s future needs and the implications of new technologies for fleet design. Prior to joining CSBA, he was Special Assistant to the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and Director of his Commander’s Action Group, where he led development of Navy strategy and implemented new initiatives in electromagnetic spectrum operations, undersea warfare, expe- ditionary operations, and personnel and readiness management. Mr. Clark was an enlisted and officer submariner, serving in afloat and ashore submarine operational and training assignments including tours as Chief Engineer and Operations Officer at the Navy’s nuclear power training unit.
    [Show full text]
  • USS Preble Returns Home from Deployment
    Another example of a mission ready ship because of a U.S. Navy Port Engineer USS Preble Returns Home from Deployment Story Number: NNS180428-08Release Date: 4/28/2018 3:16:00 PM By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Morgan K. Nall, Theodore Roosevelt Strike Group PEARL HARBOR (NNS) -- The guided-missile destroyer USS Preble (DDG 88) returns to its homeport, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, April 27, after more than six months on a deployment to the U.S. 5th and 7th Fleet areas of operation. While deployed, Preble conducted security, stability and freedom of navigation operations throughout the Arabian Sea, Indo-Pacific region, and surrounding waters. The ship was underway for more than 173 days and conducted approximately 1,000 flight hours with the ship's embarked Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 37, Det. 5 Easyriders. "I am extremely proud of the hard work and dedication Preble's Sailors have exhibited this deployment," said Cmdr. Allen Maxwell Jr., commanding officer of Preble. "We started this deployment ready to take on any mission that came our way, and we have done just that. This crew showed an incredible amount of resiliency and proved that we are dedicated to achieving mission success and greatness in everything we do." Preble began training and operating with the Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group (TRSCSG) in April 2017 to improve mission readiness and cohesion as a strike group. Preble departed JBPHH Oct. 16. Preble kicked off its deployment participating in a three carrier strike force exercise, which included the TRCSG, the USS Nimitz (CVN 68) and USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) carrier strike groups and the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force and Republic of Korea navies, sailing in close formation with more than a dozen other ships.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NORTHWESTERN HAWAIIAN ISLANDS an Annotated Bibliography Compiled by Edwin H
    THE NORTHWESTERN HAWAIIAN ISLANDS An Annotated Bibliography Compiled by Edwin H. Bryan, Jr. This bibliography was compiled by Edwin H. Bryan, Jr. while employed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hawaiian Islands and Pacific Islands National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Rm.5302, P.O. Box 50167, Honolulu, Hawaii 96850. Use of the data is pennitted so long as appropriate credits are gJven to the author and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Additional copies are available from the above address by remittance of reproduction costs. THE NORTHWESTERN HAWAIIAN ISLANDS Introduction Summary of Information 1 .•••..•••.••...•.•.•••• The Hawaiian Chain 2•........••..•.....•... Kaula Island 3•...•..............•.•• Nihoa Island 4••.•.•...•.....•..••.•. Necker Island 5..••••••••••.•••••••••• French Frigate Shoals 6•...••.••••••.••••..••. Gardner Pinnacles 7.•..••••••••.•.••...... Laysan Island a....................... Lisianski Island 9••..•........•......... Pearl and Hennes Reef 10 •..••.•.•.....•...•.••• Midway Is 1and 11 • . • . • . • . Ku re I s 1a nd 12 ..................•.... Plants, Birds, Stati·stics, and Record of Maps and Charts of the Area 13 ....•....•........••... Annotated Bibliographic References 14 ..........•............ Anonymous Articles 15 ....................... Index INTRODUCTION 1. The Hawaiian Chain We see only the peaks of the mighty range of volcanic mountains which fonn the Hawaiian Islands. They stretch from east-southeast to west-north­ west for a distance of 1660 nautical miles (1900 statute; 3057.74 kilomet- ers) or more, from the southeast side of Hawaii to beyond Midway and Kure. Each time a survey ship makes soundings along this strip it adds new sub­ merged peaks to the chain. We may divide the islands of the Hawaiian chain into three areas: (1) the eight main islands at the southeastern end; (2) the small rocky islets in the middle; and (3) the low sand and coral islands of the northwestern end.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleet Week Ships 2014
    FLEET WEEK SHIPS 2014 FLEET WEEK SHIPS 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents USS CHOSIN (CG 65)......................................................................................................................................3 HMCS CALGARY (FFH 335) .............................................................................................................................4 HMCS YELLOWKNIFE......................................................................................................................................5 HMCS BRANDON (MM 710) ...........................................................................................................................6 MV CAPE HORN ............................................................................................................................................7 USS AMERICA (CV‐66) ............................................................................................................................. 8 & 9 USS KIDD (DDG‐100) ....................................................................................................................................10 USCG ACTIVE (WMEC‐618)...........................................................................................................................11 FLEET WEEK SHIPS 2014 USS CHOSIN • In March 2003 Chosin was assigned to Cruiser‐Destroyer Group One.[3] [4] • In April 2008, Chosin failed her Board of Inspection and Survey (InSurv) examination and was judged "unfit for sustained combat operations."[5][6] • In Spring
    [Show full text]
  • USS Zumwalt APRIL 8, 2019 Navy’S Future Meets Historic Pearl Harbor
    USS Zumwalt APRIL 8, 2019 Navy’s Future Meets Historic Pearl Harbor INSIDE: NAVFAC Hawaii honors a Hero JBPHH, NEX honors Vietnam Vets Sub Officers celebrate 119 years ... more Contents 2 U.S. PACFLT sea, shore SOY announced 3-4 USS Zumwalt arrives in JBPHH 5 History Matters / PPV housing survey 6 COMSUBPAC celebrates 119th submarine offi cer birthday 9-10 COMMANDER NAVY REGION HAWAII REAR ADM. BRIAN P. FORT NAVFAC Hawaii honors a Hero Honoring Lt. j.g. Toner IV JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM COMMANDER CAPT. JEFF BERNARD DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, NAVY REGION HAWAII AGNES TAUYAN USS Preble host Malaysian Royalty/ Diverse Views 7 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, NAVY REGION HAWAII USS Santa Fe wins NEY award 8 LYDIA ROBERTSON JBPHH, NEX honors Vietnam War vets 11-12 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM Hickam school opens center 13 CHUCK ANTHONY Community calendar 14 EDITOR ANNA MARIE GENERAL PHOTO OF THE WEEK MANAGING EDITOR MC1 CORWIN COLBERT HO’OKELE STAFF: JIM NEUMAN ERIN HUGGINS MC2 CHARLES OKI STAFF SGT. JASMONET JACKSON HELEN ZUKERAN DAVID UNDERWOOD Ho‘okele is a free unoffi cial publication. All editorial content is prepared, edited, provided and approved by the staff of the Commander, Navy Region Hawaii Public Aff airs Offi ce: 850 Ticonderoga, Suite 110, JBPHH, Hawaii, 96860-4884. Telephone: (808) 473-2888; fax (808) 473-2876; e-mail address: [email protected] World Wide Web address: https://www.cnic.navy.mil/Hawaii/. This is an authorized publication primarily for members of the uniformed military services and their families in Hawaii.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Power in the Precision-Missile Age
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Navy Research U.S. Department of Defense 5-2014 SEA POWER IN THE PRECISION-MISSILE AGE Walter E. (Ted) Carter Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usnavyresearch Part of the Military History Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. Navy Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SEA POWER IN THE PRECISION-MISSILE AGE Walter E. Carter, Jr. U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings May 2014, volume 140, issue 5, pages 30-34 ISSN: 0041-798X Abstract: The article discusses how the use of long-range precision strike (LRPS) systems and other technological innovations have the potential to change the way sea wars are conducted. The increasing use of remotely piloted and autonomous air, surface, and sub-surface platforms can also impact sea wars. Advanced information and communications technologies also have an impact on warfare. Contents 1. Key Trends 2. Implications for High-End Warfare at Sea 3. The Return of Command at Sea 4. New Approach to Logistics 5. Relevant Forces for the Future In the hands of adversaries, long-range strike systems could drastically alter the conduct of war at sea The constant evolution of military technology has driven continuous change in the character of warfare, to the benefit of the militaries that adapt the most successfully. More than 70 years have passed since a major maritime conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Callsign List
    MILITARY CALLSIGN LIST as of 30 June 2020 Compiled by Ron ([email protected]) ABBREVIATIONS AAF- Army Airfield Det- Detachment ABNCP- Airborne Command Post FW- Fighter Wing AFB- Air Force Base FS- Fighter Squadron AHP- Army Heliport FTS- Fighter Training Squadron AMW- Air Movement Wing JIATF- Joint Interagency Task Force ANG- Air National Guard JRB- Joint Reserve Base ANGB- Air National Guard Base NAOC- National Airborne Operations Center AS- Airlift Squadron NAS- Naval Air Station AW- Airlift Wing NASA- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Bn- Battalion SAM- Special Air Movement BW- Bomb Wing SOF-Supervisor of Flying CAP- Civil Air Patrol SOS- Special Operations Squadron CGAS- US Coast Guard Air Station TSC- Tactical Support Center Co- Company USAV- US Army Vessel CP- Command Post USCG- United States Coast Guard BACKGROUND This list is the work of many people. I started in 1998 with a basic list that I pulled off of the web. That list had been compiled by Hugh Stegman, a highly respected radio hobbyist and columnist for Monitoring Times. A special "Thank You" to Larry Van Horn for the section on NASA callsigns. In the intervening years I have added callsigns that I myself have heard and verified as well as those from various “seasoned”, respected milcomer’s and HF utility communications hobbyists here in the US as well as Europe. One should take most military calls with a grain of salt. They are often used by more than one unit. Also, the US military is closing bases left and right, moving and combining units, transferring tasks to the reserves, and the like.
    [Show full text]