From Opera to Opra to Ø to the Followers of Ø – a Tracing of the History Leading up to the Norwegian Opra’S Affirmative Oratory to Arms! to Arms!

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Opera to Opra to Ø to the Followers of Ø – a Tracing of the History Leading up to the Norwegian Opra’S Affirmative Oratory to Arms! to Arms! From opera to opra to Ø to the Followers of Ø – A tracing of the history leading up to The Norwegian Opra’s affirmative Oratory To arms! To arms! — By Trond Reinholdtsen, opra director of The Norwegian Opra 81 From opera to opra to Ø to the Followers It is not necessary to repeat to the toilet window – opened the same of Ø – A tracing of the history leading up to The Norwegian Opra’s affirmative Oratory readers of this publication that week (or so). The art form in To arms! To arms! is a commissioned text opera as a relevant and potent question is no longer the outcast where the opra director at Den Norske Opra, Trond Reinholdtsen, writes about the history art form is dead, and has been genre of “opera”, but rather the of this institution and its followers. so for almost a hundred years new and potentially virginally Trond Reinholdtsen is educated as a clas- (since 1925, exactly). Despite fresh “opra”; a genre devoid of sical composer and singer. In his work, he is the effective use of newly built the Schlamm of traditions and mixing references to lecture, documentary, performance and banality with his interest in fancy-schmæncy architecture definitions. While The Norwegian narrative form, mathematical structure and opera houses serving as tourism Opera and Ballet considered communist propaganda. magnets, despite politicians’ having one world premiere during vanity projects and signifiers of its first five years, The Norwegian urban capitalistic dynamism, and Opra announced 15 in its first year despite desperate attempts to fake (admittedly all of them by the coolness and contemporaneity in opra director himself). belated Regitheater-stagings with Rigoletto in jeans, der Holländer The founding principle of The as business man or Papageno as Norwegian Opra was the old television celebrity, and despite Marxist maxim to gain “total still another sorry composer control over the means of produc- sacrificing artistic integrity and tion”. All aspects of the institution accepting impossible working should be treated artistically. conditions in the hope of gaining The aim was, through a radical some remnant of quasi-public downscaling of the opera appara- appreciation, we will not let tus, to reclaim nothing less than ourselves be fooled: Nothing, ARTISTIC FREEDOM AT ITS in terms of true artistic value or PUREST (which is fundamentally authentic creation, is happening lost in the repressive bureaucratic, with opera anymore. overly-academic, sneak-commer- cialized and conservative elitism This we all know. of the contemporary music scene). I was myself the dictatorial opra And it needs no further discus- director, the composer of all sion. So when the The Norwegian works, as well as the librettist, Opra had its inaugural perfor- director, Heldentenor, scenogra- mance of Orpheus in the opera pher, propaganda minister, web director’s living room in Oslo designer, ticketmaster, cleaning gate 7 in Oslo 2009, it was but a assistant, conceptual consultant, coincidence that The Norwegian head of the Worker’s Union, res- Opera and Ballet in Bjørvika – taurant chief etc. No more weak which incidentally can been seen institutional criticism aiming to from of the former institution’s modify the system from the inside 82 83 (which I had done for years)! in some sort of theoretical centrip- A kind of nucleus commune is ness come solely in the form of From now on, I build my own etal post-structuralist blind alley consolidated on the paradisiacal neo-fascism and are driven by institutions! quagmire of doubts, indecisions meadow, but their true orientation the more or less secret desire for and general philosophical frag- and format is The Whole World. violence. Meanwhile, the rest of In 2015, The Norwegian Opra had mentation. They are also perfect. While Ø is the ultimate with- the political sphere are forced into grown to a small crew of dedi- Yes, this is what perfection looks drawal from political, digital and a totally defensive apathy and are cated Opra-Superstars and moved like. Perfection comes in the form everyday banality for the sake not able to do anything other than its location to the forest in Sweden of the Void (Ø is the mathematical of Truth in an absolute refusing trying to save what can be saved to further radicalize its quest for symbol of the “empty set”). It of the Idea of the Public, The of formerly gained goods of the “isolation and concentration” would be irritating to go into a Followers, in an operation of true common, lobbying for unisex signaling a brutal cut with THE further explanation at this point, Hegelian Aufhebung, turns this toilet and otherwise keep as silent SYSTEM, and in the end also so please just accept this as an into its own negative. The authen- as possible and hope for the best. abandoning the concept of ”the axiom for now. tic Opposite is the confirmation It is an impotent struggle for a audience”. Instead, in the cellar of of the original Truth. Or in a more “capitalism with a human face”. the opera house, an infinite series BUT (fortunately): The opra theological language: If Ø is the of opra-films, was begun under films are posted on the so called testament, The Followers of Ø are There has evolved a version the name Ø. It is a mixture of “internet” and a group of viewing the apostles. Their first official of so-called ”accelerationism” dystopian science fiction, verismo, enthusiasts, a gang of idealized appearance will be a two and a bordering on the pathological in communist propaganda, outdated audience members, a true cult of half hour ideological affirmative a dark corner of contemporary existentialism and plump autobi- Precariat-Proletariat of Chosen Oratory in Jakob kirke in Oslo thinking (but the dark corners ography. In other words, a little Ones going under the name called To arms! To arms! Yep, seem to be the new centre like Der Ring des Nibelungen (but of “The Followers of Ø” have ladies and gentlemen, the time anyway). This version, sometimes much longer of course). The oper- gathered together from all over the of ambiguous theatre of minor called “Apocalyptic accelera- atic series counts 16 – no, 17! – world, transcending all identitar- particular struggles, weak pockets tionism”, may represent the true episodes at the moment of writing, ian borders, at a big meadow in of resistance and meditative moral challenge of today. It grew with one – admittedly compli- the forest of Sweden. Toward this considerations is over. The time out of a hallucinatory mixture of cated, but nonetheless continuous unlikely spot, they all gravitate: for the propagandistic medium of the cyberpunk culture of the 80’s, – narrative: Three protagonists, The old, the sick, the converted the forgotten Oratory is here! Oslo the rave and drug Jungle-techno for the sake of simplicity let’s capitalists, the minorities, the International Theatre Festival scene of the 90’s, and a sinister call them Parsifal, Parsifal and incels, the Lumpenproletariat, the has changed its name to Oratory desire for the ultimate unknown Parsifal, grow up in a cellar totally stupid, the sick, the animals, the Festival of the Stunde Null and radical alterity. It was cooked isolated from THE OUTSIDE. monsters, the un-organic things, Internationale! Hurrah! Hurrah! up by the notorious Nick Land They form a kind of enthusiastic all forms of matter – in short: the Hurrah! and his gang of student disciples alchemistic sect, and gradually, a radical universal Everyone. They in his infamously greasy office vision of a totally world changing aim to interpret and translate the The Followers, as the rest of us, in the University of Warwick in Event grows forth. Gradually message of Ø into potent action in have understood that we are all England. When reading about it though, their experiments in the concrete reality of our world: heading towards the Apocalypse. today, it comes forth as pure death political theory and new art forms An affirmative transition from As a civilization we have totally drive translated to philosophy: To seem to somehow lose some of theory to PRAXIS. lost the ability to create or to accelerate capital, growth, digi- the initial “directedness”, and the re-imagine the future. All political talization and cryptology (!) until fear is that they are getting stuck invention, creativity and grand- systematic overflow and possible 84 85 human extinction, until hopefully Vorabend two days before the some form of artificial intelligence Oratory). “The Followers of Ø” takes over the Promethean task of have carefully studied the Ø-cycle continuing progress and history. and reached an already expert To go as far as possible whatever level of understanding. They aim outcome, as general Kurtz in to be the instruments of Ø. Former Nick Land’s favourite movie audience members of Ø have tried Apocalypse Now! or as formulated to interpret the world. The task in the title of his only published now is to change it. But praxis book The Thirst for Annihilation. means failure. Praxis always involves misunderstandings of In 2020, when the perspective of theory. Praxis means repetition catastrophic climate change and (“failing better” and all that). other environmental and social Praxis means continuation. Praxis disasters feels acute, Land’s sui- has to cast off depression and fear. cidal strategy on behalf of human- And most important: Praxis means ity looms in the unconsciousness commitment. Where follows: of our collective politics. Land Praxis needs energy. Ergo: Praxis offers the desire of submitting to needs lemonade. The Oratory is the dynamic of capital and the a lemonade motor in the fight to machine while at the same time upholding the energy. The energy enjoying the hopelessness and to say (and do) “Yes”.
Recommended publications
  • Download (8Mb)
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/110900 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications THE BRITISH LIBRARY BRITISH THESIS SERVICE COPYRIGHT Reproduction of this thesis, other than as permitted under the United Kingdom Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under specific agreement with the copyright holder, is prohibited. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. REPRODUCTION QUALITY NOTICE Th e quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the original thesis. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the highest quality of reproduction, some pages which contain small or poor printing may not reproduce well. Previously copyrighted material (journal articles, published texts etc.) is not reproduced. THIS THESIS HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FLATLINE CONSTRUCTS: GOTHIC MATERIALISM AND CYBERNETIC THEORY-FICTION Mark Fisher Presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Warwick July 1999 Numerous Originals in Colour Abstract FLATLINE CONSTRUCTS: GOTHIC MATERIALISM AND CYBERNETIC THEORY- FICTION Cyberpunk fiction has been called “the supreme literary expression, if not of postmodernism then of late capitalism itself.” (Jameson) This thesis aims to analyse and question this claim by rethinking cyberpunk Action, postmodernism and late capitalism in terms of three - interlocking - themes: cybernetics, the Gothic and fiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Future for Accelerationism?
    Is there a Future for Accelerationism? Abstract Accelerationism emerged from the insatiable market of ideas, a market that it attempts to intensify and ultimately repurpose in its own image. It is, however, an idea with consequences. The logic of accelerationism is not simply to exacerbate an inherent crisis of capitalism, either in order to provide a remedy in a more speedy fashion or consign it to its doom as a merciful gesture – putting it out of its misery, as it were. The process of acceleration underpinning the theory, of speeding up or intensification, is instead an active component of a re-imagined (post-)capitalism. This re-imagining is hyperstitional – a performative fiction invoked to overturn many seldom-questioned assumptions held across the academic spectrum. In attempting to foment the approach it both craves and envisages renders accelerationism almost unrecognisable as a serious contribution to academic debates on organisations and their management, even from critical perspectives. This article is not an attempt to accelerate nor to exemplify accelerationism, but instead contributes to the debate by identifying, examining and connecting core features of the conceptual framework underpinning the different approaches to accelerationism. It will focus in particular on Deleuze and Guattari’s contribution to this framework (desiring production; deterritorialisation; Body Without Organs, etc.) and examine their version of assemblage (agencement) as a way of conceptualising both the transformation of the machinery of capitalism
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1080/21693293.2019.1609199 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Michelsen, N., & de Orellana, P. G. (2019). Discourses of Resilience in the US Alt Right. Resilience, International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 7(3), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2019.1609199 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Fascism/Art/Theory an Introduction to What Hurts Us
    Anti-fascism/Art/Theory An Introduction to What Hurts Us Angela Dimitrakaki and Harry Weeks Three Narratives We will begin by stating the obvious. For reasons explained by many but averted by none, the consolidation of global capitalism executed by neoliberalism has generated such levels of polarisation and discontent as to have apparently raised fascism from the dead, given it – besides electoral purchase – an internet connection and a clickbait farm guaranteeing followers in the millions. That’s how one narrative goes. According to another narrative, it is not spectral, or even zombie, fascism that has entered the political room of the Global North while sweeping very large territories of the Global South, but a new configuration of authoritarianism and social hatred: Enzo Traverso, author of The New Faces of Fascism (2019), speaks of ‘post-fascism’, arguing that many of the authoritarian parties and rulers of the radical right do not claim a connection with fascism: On the one hand, the new far right is no longer fascist; on the other hand, we cannot define it without comparing it with fascism. The new right is a hybrid thing that might return to fascism, or it could turn into a new form of conservative, authoritarian, populist democracy. The concept of post-fascism tries to capture this.1 But at the same time, Traverso admits, ‘the new right is nationalist, racist, and xenophobic’, to which, we would add, that it also tends to be attached to strongman-type, ‘charismatic’ leadership.2 These are pretty solid attributes of fascism, especially when they congeal into a violent discourse identifying as a core cause ‘external’ and ‘internal’ enemies that must be 1 Nicolas Allen and Martín Cortés, ‘Fascisms Old and New: An Interview with Enzo Traverso’, Jacobin, 4 February 2019, https://jacobinmag.com/2019/02/enzo-traverso-post-fascism-ideology-conservatism, accessed 10 January 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Spirit in the Crypt Negarestani Vs Land
    Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 1, 2019 REVIEW ARTICLE SPIRIT IN THE CRYPT NEGARESTANI VS LAND Vincent Le ABSTRACT: Iranian philosopher Reza Negarestani’s first 2008 book Cyclonopedia was written under the influence of Nick Land’s nihilistic and antihumanist philosophy which seeks to critique anthropomorphism by confronting us with our coming extinction beyond which our concepts of reason cannot reach. Since Cyclonopedia’s publication, however, Negarestani has left behind Landian nihilism to develop in his 2018 book Intelligence and Spirit a neorationalist philosophy of mind whose primary influences are Sellars, Brandom, and Hegel. At 579 clearly written yet dense pages, it is difficult even for a review article to encapsulate the book in its entirety. The first half of this article instead aims to provide a sense of the book’s overall project by focusing on how Negarestani outlines and develops his neorationalist philosophy through a critique of Land’s antihumanism. Never one to remain silent whilst others seek to resurrect Hegel from the dead, since December 2018, Land has been releasing a draft on his blog Urban Futures 2.1 of his new monograph Crypto- Current: Bitcoin and Philosophy, which proffers the most up to date articulation of his main antihumanist tenets. Having organized Intelligence and Spirit around Negarestani’s objections to Land, this article’s second half turns to Crypto-Current to see how Land is able to provide convincing responses to each of Negarestani’s objections, showing some to be based on strawman characterizations, others to stem from misunderstandings of Land’s position, and still others to lack traction at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Friendship on Fascism, Consensus & the Politics of Philosophy
    FRIENDSHIP ON FASCISM, CONSENSUS & THE POLITICS OF PHILOSOPHY 0. When the political right declares the political left to be the “true fascists” in the midst of our contemporary culture wars, they are perhaps recognising their own aptitude for producing an internal consensus in contrast to the left’s inability to agree & its readiness to eject everything which does not wholly coincide with itself. This is, of course, to suggest that fascists can’t agree. The truth is that they must. Here, already, the fi rst of our paradoxes emerges. This essay will attempt to grapple with many. 1. What defi nes the popular conception of fascism today is itself largely in contention. Generally speaking, fascism seems to be defi ned by an indeterminate intolerance & the forced suppression of any opposition. Whilst this is indeed a central tendency at the heart of any fascism, the nature of the suppression at hand – which underpins all such accusations, knocked back & forth across the political divide – is often vague & underdefi ned. At the very least, we can say that perceptions of power are central. The left’s ability to set the cultural agenda, arguably underappreciated within its own ranks, is seen as tyrannical by a right which nonetheless has a fi rmer grip on state power than it often likes to admit. Nonetheless, the ground from which both accusations of fascism are thrown is worth taking note of. Holding these two perspectives together – with no comment made on the validity of the arguments which constitute them – we begin to see a picture of two opposing forces which give shape to our contemporary status quo; of two opposing sides which constitute the internal borders of that which is, warring over how far they can shift the Overton Window which frames our present moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche and Modern German Thought
    Nietzsche and Modern German Thought Edited by Keith Ansell-Pearson London and New York First published 1991 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2002. Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge a division of Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc. 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1991 Keith Ansell-Pearson for selection and editorial matter. Individual chapters © 1990 the respective contributors. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted, or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Catagloguing in Publication Data Nietzsche and modern German thought. 1. German philosophy. Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844–1900 I. Ansell-Pearson. Keith 193 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Nietzsche and modern German thought/[edited by] Keith Ansell-Pearson p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Nietzsche. Friedrich Wilhelm. 1844–1900—Contributions in modern German philosophy. 2. Philosophy, German—19th century. 3. Philosophy, German—20th century. I. Ansell-Pearson, Keith. B3317.N485 1991 193–dc20 90–48665 CIP ISBN 0-415-04442-1 (Print Edition) ISBN 0-203-00397-7 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-21078-6 (Glassbook Format) Contents Notes on contributors v Introduction 1 Keith Ansell-Pearson 1 Nietzsche,
    [Show full text]
  • On the Necessity of Art's Exit from Contemporary
    URBANOMIC 2014–2015 3 Since 2006 Urbanomic have played a crucial role in fostering new movements in contemporary thought and introducing them to a wider audience—including Speculative Realism, Object-Oriented Philosophy, Non-Philosophy, and Accelerationism. Since the publication of the rst volume of our acclaimed Collapse series, a rm commitment to cross-disciplinary thinking outside the academy has propelled Urbanomic beyond a traditional theory/philosophy readership, attracting a dedicated following.* We continue to publish Contact: works that assemble new audiences and forge Louise McDermott +44 (0)203 691 2791 new alliances in thought. [email protected] Urbanomic Media Ltd As well as Collapse, our catalogue includes the The Old Lemonade Factory Windsor Quarry groundbreaking series of publications produced Falmouth collaboratively since 2010 with Sequence Press TR11 3EX UK in New York; MONO, a new series of works by www.urbanomic.com emerging contemporary thinkers; and the new Distributor (UK, EU): Central Books, London. REDACTIONS series documenting and extending www.centralbooks.com the ‘research-in-progress’ ethos of Urbanomic’s + 44 (0)845 458 9911 US: Contact Katherine Pickard (Sequence Press) events programme. [email protected] 212.995.1774 Urbanomic is a trading name of Urbanomic Media Ltd, a limited company incorporated * Special thanks to our readers for the in England and Wales with registration number 8928468. Registered office: The Old Lemonade Factory, Windsor Quarry, Falmouth, TR11 3EX, UK. photographs featured in this catalogue. HIGHLIGHTS HIGHLIGHTS Exploring the political heresy of accelerationism, Object-Oriented Philosophy—beyond the hype: from Marx to the contemporary scene. Realist revolution or metaphysical regression? #Accelerate Object-Oriented The Accelerationist Reader Philosophy Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tragic Sublime: Libidinal Pessimism and the Problem
    THE TRAGIC SUBLIME: LIBIDINAL PESSIMISM AND THE PROBLEM OF EXISTENCE By Sean G. Elbourne A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The Faculty of Arts The University of New South Wales 2005 Originality Statement I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged. (Signed)…………………………………………………………….. iii ABSTRACT In this thesis I explore the attempt by Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich Nietzsche and Georges Bataille to confront the problem of the meaning and value of existence. I consider each of these philosophers as involved in the development of a stream of post-Kantian thought that, following Nick Land, I call libidinal pessimism. Libidinal pessimism is both the metaphysical principle of the primacy of willing as the fundamental reality, and the moral principle that the greatest value to our existence is to be found in liberating willing from the small-scale concern of the good of individual beings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speculative Turn Continental Materialism and Realism
    The Speculative Turn Continental Materialism and Realism Edited by Levi Bryant, Nick Srnicek and Graham Harman Open Access Statement – Please Read This book is Open Access. This work is not simply an electronic book; it is the open access version of a work that exists in a number of forms, the traditional printed form being one of them. Copyright Notice This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal aca- demic scholarship without express permission of the author and the publisher of this volume. Furthermore, for any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. For more information see the details of the creative commons licence at this website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ This means that you can: • read and store this document free of charge • distribute it for personal use free of charge • print sections of the work for personal use • read or perform parts of the work in a context where no financial transactions take place However, you cannot: • gain financially from the work in anyway • sell the work or seek monies in relation to the distribution of the work • use the work in any commercial activity of any kind • profit a third party indirectly via use or distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis, Spirit and the End of Europe Benjamin Noys
    Abstract: ‘Europe endless’ is the endlessly deferred promise of Europe C R as a site of rationality and freedom. In the face of the collapse of this I promise it seems most current orientations are trying to ‘end Europe’, S Europe Endless: I either in actuality or at the level of the idea or concept. Here I want to S reconstruct the discourse of the crisis of Europe and the conjoined discourse of the spirit of Europe. This begins with Nietzsche as the & philosopher of Europe as the crisis of nihilism in which Europe must Crisis, Spirit C be traversed to find a new ‘spirit’. This crisis of spirit is projected as a R global crisis to produce a meta-imperial traversal of crisis for the sake of I Europe. Then the analysis moves to Husserl and the phenomenological T I and the End of reading of European ‘spirit’, which treats Europe as a ‘life world’ Q encompassing all others. Here Europe ‘endless’ is expansive and yet U delimited. Finally, I consider the contemporary ‘global’ discourse of E accelerationism, another Nietzschean current that embraces the solvent / Europe forces of technology and abstraction. The ‘spirit’ of Europe is formed Volume 6 / within the forgetting of Europe and, as a result, the turning of the global Issue 1 into Europe. These discourses of ‘spirit’ at once try to end and maintain ‘Europe Endless’. Instead, perhaps posing issues and problems of the actualisation of rationality and freedom might start to grasp the potentialities of ‘Europe endless’ beyond this constantly deferred end. Benjamin Noys Keywords: Europe; Crisis; Nietzsche; Husserl; Accelerationism It seems ironic that at the moment the unifying concern of Europe is how to put an end to Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (12Mb)
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/4333 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism Deepak Narang Sawhney Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph. D. University of Warwick Department of Philosophy May 1996 Contents Acknowledgements Declaration Summary Key to Abbreviations and Thesis Outline i Introduction 1 I Consuming the Future 13 H Body without Organs 50 III The Stratification of the World-Economy 79 IV Geopolitics: Antisysternic Movements of Resistance 116 V Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 152 Concluding Remarks: 174 'Class Consciousness'and 'The American Rhizome' Tables 192 Bibliography 195 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledgeDr. Nick Land for his invaluable support throughout this project, and to my family for their love and patience. Declaration The following is a list of chaptersfrom Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism that are published in abridged form: Chapter HI: 'The Stratification of the World-Economy', in Must Me Burn Sade?,Deepak N Sawhney (ed) (NJ: Humanities Press, 1997) Chapter IV: 'Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance', in Gilles Deleuze and Minoritarian Becomings,
    [Show full text]