DOCSLIB.ORG

Nietzsche and Modern German Thought

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nietzsche and Modern German Thought Nietzsche and Modern German Thought Edited by Keith Ansell-Pearson London and New York First published 1991 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2002. Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge a division of Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc. 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1991 Keith Ansell-Pearson for selection and editorial matter. Individual chapters © 1990 the respective contributors. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted, or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Catagloguing in Publication Data Nietzsche and modern German thought. 1. German philosophy. Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844–1900 I. Ansell-Pearson. Keith 193 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Nietzsche and modern German thought/[edited by] Keith Ansell-Pearson p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Nietzsche. Friedrich Wilhelm. 1844–1900—Contributions in modern German philosophy. 2. Philosophy, German—19th century. 3. Philosophy, German—20th century. I. Ansell-Pearson, Keith. B3317.N485 1991 193–dc20 90–48665 CIP ISBN 0-415-04442-1 (Print Edition) ISBN 0-203-00397-7 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-21078-6 (Glassbook Format) Contents Notes on contributors v Introduction 1 Keith Ansell-Pearson 1 Nietzsche, Christianity, and the legitimacy of tradition 10 John Walker 2 Kant, Lange, and Nietzsche: critique of knowledge 30 George J.Stack 3 Schein in Nietzsche’s philosophy 59 Robert Rethy 4 Hermeneutics and Nietzsche’s early thought 88 Nicholas Davey 5 Nietzsche, the self, and Schopenhauer 119 Christopher Janaway 6 Marx and Nietzsche: the individual in history 143 Ian Forbes 7 Nietzsche and the problem of the will in modernity 165 Keith Ansell-Pearson 8 Autonomy and solitude 192 J.M.Bernstein 9 Affirmation and eternal return in the Free-Spirit Trilogy 216 Howard Caygill 10 Art as insurrection: the question of aesthetics in Kant, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche 240 Nick Land iv Nietzsche and Modern German Thought 11 Reading the future of genealogy: Kant, Nietzsche, Plato 257 Michael Newman 12 Nietzsche, Heidegger, and the metaphysics of modernity 282 Robert B.Pippin Index 311 Contributors Keith Ansell-Pearson is lecturer in political theory at Queen Mary & Westfield College, University of London, having previously taught philosophy at the University of Malawi. He has published essays on Nietzsche, Kant, Marxism, Foucault, and African thought. His study of Rousseau and Nietzsche will be published later this year by Cambridge University Press, and he is currently preparing a new edition of Nietzsche’s ‘On the Genealogy of Morals’ for the Cambridge University Press series Texts in the History of Political Thought. Jay Bernstein is reader in philosophy at the University of Essex. He was educated at Trinity College, Connecticut, and Edinburgh University. He is the author of The Philosophy of the Novel: Lukács, Marxism, and the Dialectics of Form (Harvester: Minnesota University Press, 1984), Art, Metaphysics, and Modernity: Aesthetic Alienation from Kant to Derrida and Adorno (Polity). He has also edited a selection of Adorno’s essays on mass culture published by Routledge. At present he is engaged on a study of Rousseau’s critique on liberalism. Howard Caygill lectures in the School of Economic & Social Studies at the University of East Anglia. He was educated at the universities of Bristol and Sussex and has held research posts in Sociology and Philosophy at Balliol College and Wolfson College, Oxford. He is the author of Art of Judgement (Blackwell, 1989). Nicholas Davey studied the history of ideas and philosophy at the universities of York, Sussex, and Tübingen, and has undertaken research in Berlin and Weimar. Since 1976 he has lectured in philosophy at the City University, London, Manchester University, and South Glamorgan Institute of Higher Education, Cardiff. He has published essays on Baumgarten’s aesthetics, Hume, Heidegger’s aesthetics, Gadamer, Habermas, and Nietzsche’s contribution to aesthetics and hermeneutics. Ian Forbes has been a lecturer in politics at Southampton University since 1983. His prize-winning Ph.D. thesis, Marx and the New Individual, is published by Unwin Hyman. He has co-edited a book on human nature, and published essays on Nietzsche, feminist thought, rights, and socialism. For three years he was director of the Socialist vi Nietzsche and Modern German Thought Philosophy Group, and edited the influential pamphlet Market Socialism: Whose Choice?. Christopher Janaway graduated from Oxford in philosophy and German and went on to do a D.Phil, on Schopenhauer. Since 1981 he has been lecturer in philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London. He is the author of Self and World in Schopenhauer’s Philosophy (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1989). Nick Land studied philosophy at the universities of Sussex and Essex and is currently lecturer in philosophy at the University of Warwick, where he specializes in mass materialism. He has published essays on Blanchot, Kant, and de Sade, and is currently completing a book on Bataille. Michael Newman is an art critic and is currently writing a Ph.D. at Essex University on Nietzsche and Walter Benjamin. He lectures in art history and theory at various art schools and universities. His publications include ‘Revising Modernism, Representing Post-modernism’ in Postmodernism, ed. Lisa Appignanesi, London, Free Association Books (1989), and essays and catalogue books on modern and contemporary art. Robert B.Pippin is professor of philosophy at the University of California, San Diego. He was educated at Trinity College, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of Kant’s Theory of Form (Yale University Press, 1982), Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness (Cambridge University Press, 1989), and numerous articles on the history of the modern philosophical tradition. His most recent book is Modernity as a Philosophical Problem: On the Dissatisfactions of European High Culture (Basil Blackwell). Robert Rethy is currently associate professor of philosophy at Xavier University. He was educated at Trinity College, and Pennsylvania State University. During 1989– 90 he was visiting professor at the University of Essex. He is the author of numerous articles and reviews on Heraclitus, Descartes, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and modern German philosophy. George J.Stack is professor of philosophy at the State University of New York, Brockport College. Amongst his books are On Kierkegaard: Philosophical Fragments (Humanities Press, 1976), Kierkegaard’s Existential Ethics (University of Alabama Press, 1976), Sartre’s Philosophy of Social Existence (Warren H.Green Inc., 1978), and Lange and Nietzsche (Walter de Gruyter, 1983). He is currently completing a study of Nietzsche and Emerson. John Walker was educated at Queen’s College, Cambridge, and has studied at the University of Tübingen. He has been a research fellow at Wolfson College, Oxford, and at the University of Liverpool. Since 1988 he has been fellow and director of studies in German at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He is currently completing a book on Hegel. Introduction Keith Ansell-Pearson Almost every important German thinker, even if he has not remained a Kantian, has at least started out from Kant and from the need clearly to define his position with respect to Kant’s ideas. Lucien Goldmann, Immanuel Kant Recent years have seen an astonishing array of studies on Nietzsche’s philosophy reflecting the emergence of a serious and scholarly interest in Nietzsche’s writings amongst Anglo-American philosophers, sociologists, and political theorists. This volume sets out to make a contribution to the current revaluation of Nietzsche’s philosophy. All of the essays have been specially written at the request of the editor and have not appeared before. The aim is to examine in a critical and illuminating way Nietzsche’s relation to Kant and the post-Kantian tradition of modern German thought. The volume taken as a whole is designed to cast light on the chief areas of Nietzsche’s relation to the Kantian heritage that encompasses the domains of knowledge, ethics, and art as articulated in Kant’s three major critiques of pure reason, of practical reason, and of judgement. Some grandiose claims have been made on behalf of Nietzsche’s writings in recent years—that he brings about the end of the western philosophical tradition, that he overcomes metaphysics, that he inaugurates a post-philosophical style of thinking, that he is the first postmodernist, and so on. But the claim that Nietzsche breaks with the philosophical tradition neglects the fact that his innermost thinking is born out of a ‘confrontation’ (the German is Auseinandersetzung, denoting a settlement, an exchange) with the modern philosophical tradition. By emphasizing the importance of situating Nietzsche’s ideas in the context of the modern philosophical tradition it is not the intention of the volume to undermine the radical nature of his thought; rather, it has to be the case that the originality 2 Nietzsche and Modern German Thought and radicalness of any thinker can only be fully appreciated when his or her ideas are situated in the context of the tradition that the particular thinker was seeking to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download (8Mb)
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/110900 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications THE BRITISH LIBRARY BRITISH THESIS SERVICE COPYRIGHT Reproduction of this thesis, other than as permitted under the United Kingdom Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under specific agreement with the copyright holder, is prohibited. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. REPRODUCTION QUALITY NOTICE Th e quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the original thesis. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the highest quality of reproduction, some pages which contain small or poor printing may not reproduce well. Previously copyrighted material (journal articles, published texts etc.) is not reproduced. THIS THESIS HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FLATLINE CONSTRUCTS: GOTHIC MATERIALISM AND CYBERNETIC THEORY-FICTION Mark Fisher Presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Warwick July 1999 Numerous Originals in Colour Abstract FLATLINE CONSTRUCTS: GOTHIC MATERIALISM AND CYBERNETIC THEORY- FICTION Cyberpunk fiction has been called “the supreme literary expression, if not of postmodernism then of late capitalism itself.” (Jameson) This thesis aims to analyse and question this claim by rethinking cyberpunk Action, postmodernism and late capitalism in terms of three - interlocking - themes: cybernetics, the Gothic and fiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Future for Accelerationism?
    Is there a Future for Accelerationism? Abstract Accelerationism emerged from the insatiable market of ideas, a market that it attempts to intensify and ultimately repurpose in its own image. It is, however, an idea with consequences. The logic of accelerationism is not simply to exacerbate an inherent crisis of capitalism, either in order to provide a remedy in a more speedy fashion or consign it to its doom as a merciful gesture – putting it out of its misery, as it were. The process of acceleration underpinning the theory, of speeding up or intensification, is instead an active component of a re-imagined (post-)capitalism. This re-imagining is hyperstitional – a performative fiction invoked to overturn many seldom-questioned assumptions held across the academic spectrum. In attempting to foment the approach it both craves and envisages renders accelerationism almost unrecognisable as a serious contribution to academic debates on organisations and their management, even from critical perspectives. This article is not an attempt to accelerate nor to exemplify accelerationism, but instead contributes to the debate by identifying, examining and connecting core features of the conceptual framework underpinning the different approaches to accelerationism. It will focus in particular on Deleuze and Guattari’s contribution to this framework (desiring production; deterritorialisation; Body Without Organs, etc.) and examine their version of assemblage (agencement) as a way of conceptualising both the transformation of the machinery of capitalism
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1080/21693293.2019.1609199 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Michelsen, N., & de Orellana, P. G. (2019). Discourses of Resilience in the US Alt Right. Resilience, International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 7(3), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2019.1609199 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Fascism/Art/Theory an Introduction to What Hurts Us
    Anti-fascism/Art/Theory An Introduction to What Hurts Us Angela Dimitrakaki and Harry Weeks Three Narratives We will begin by stating the obvious. For reasons explained by many but averted by none, the consolidation of global capitalism executed by neoliberalism has generated such levels of polarisation and discontent as to have apparently raised fascism from the dead, given it – besides electoral purchase – an internet connection and a clickbait farm guaranteeing followers in the millions. That’s how one narrative goes. According to another narrative, it is not spectral, or even zombie, fascism that has entered the political room of the Global North while sweeping very large territories of the Global South, but a new configuration of authoritarianism and social hatred: Enzo Traverso, author of The New Faces of Fascism (2019), speaks of ‘post-fascism’, arguing that many of the authoritarian parties and rulers of the radical right do not claim a connection with fascism: On the one hand, the new far right is no longer fascist; on the other hand, we cannot define it without comparing it with fascism. The new right is a hybrid thing that might return to fascism, or it could turn into a new form of conservative, authoritarian, populist democracy. The concept of post-fascism tries to capture this.1 But at the same time, Traverso admits, ‘the new right is nationalist, racist, and xenophobic’, to which, we would add, that it also tends to be attached to strongman-type, ‘charismatic’ leadership.2 These are pretty solid attributes of fascism, especially when they congeal into a violent discourse identifying as a core cause ‘external’ and ‘internal’ enemies that must be 1 Nicolas Allen and Martín Cortés, ‘Fascisms Old and New: An Interview with Enzo Traverso’, Jacobin, 4 February 2019, https://jacobinmag.com/2019/02/enzo-traverso-post-fascism-ideology-conservatism, accessed 10 January 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Spirit in the Crypt Negarestani Vs Land
    Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 1, 2019 REVIEW ARTICLE SPIRIT IN THE CRYPT NEGARESTANI VS LAND Vincent Le ABSTRACT: Iranian philosopher Reza Negarestani’s first 2008 book Cyclonopedia was written under the influence of Nick Land’s nihilistic and antihumanist philosophy which seeks to critique anthropomorphism by confronting us with our coming extinction beyond which our concepts of reason cannot reach. Since Cyclonopedia’s publication, however, Negarestani has left behind Landian nihilism to develop in his 2018 book Intelligence and Spirit a neorationalist philosophy of mind whose primary influences are Sellars, Brandom, and Hegel. At 579 clearly written yet dense pages, it is difficult even for a review article to encapsulate the book in its entirety. The first half of this article instead aims to provide a sense of the book’s overall project by focusing on how Negarestani outlines and develops his neorationalist philosophy through a critique of Land’s antihumanism. Never one to remain silent whilst others seek to resurrect Hegel from the dead, since December 2018, Land has been releasing a draft on his blog Urban Futures 2.1 of his new monograph Crypto- Current: Bitcoin and Philosophy, which proffers the most up to date articulation of his main antihumanist tenets. Having organized Intelligence and Spirit around Negarestani’s objections to Land, this article’s second half turns to Crypto-Current to see how Land is able to provide convincing responses to each of Negarestani’s objections, showing some to be based on strawman characterizations, others to stem from misunderstandings of Land’s position, and still others to lack traction at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Friendship on Fascism, Consensus & the Politics of Philosophy
    FRIENDSHIP ON FASCISM, CONSENSUS & THE POLITICS OF PHILOSOPHY 0. When the political right declares the political left to be the “true fascists” in the midst of our contemporary culture wars, they are perhaps recognising their own aptitude for producing an internal consensus in contrast to the left’s inability to agree & its readiness to eject everything which does not wholly coincide with itself. This is, of course, to suggest that fascists can’t agree. The truth is that they must. Here, already, the fi rst of our paradoxes emerges. This essay will attempt to grapple with many. 1. What defi nes the popular conception of fascism today is itself largely in contention. Generally speaking, fascism seems to be defi ned by an indeterminate intolerance & the forced suppression of any opposition. Whilst this is indeed a central tendency at the heart of any fascism, the nature of the suppression at hand – which underpins all such accusations, knocked back & forth across the political divide – is often vague & underdefi ned. At the very least, we can say that perceptions of power are central. The left’s ability to set the cultural agenda, arguably underappreciated within its own ranks, is seen as tyrannical by a right which nonetheless has a fi rmer grip on state power than it often likes to admit. Nonetheless, the ground from which both accusations of fascism are thrown is worth taking note of. Holding these two perspectives together – with no comment made on the validity of the arguments which constitute them – we begin to see a picture of two opposing forces which give shape to our contemporary status quo; of two opposing sides which constitute the internal borders of that which is, warring over how far they can shift the Overton Window which frames our present moment.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Necessity of Art's Exit from Contemporary
    URBANOMIC 2014–2015 3 Since 2006 Urbanomic have played a crucial role in fostering new movements in contemporary thought and introducing them to a wider audience—including Speculative Realism, Object-Oriented Philosophy, Non-Philosophy, and Accelerationism. Since the publication of the rst volume of our acclaimed Collapse series, a rm commitment to cross-disciplinary thinking outside the academy has propelled Urbanomic beyond a traditional theory/philosophy readership, attracting a dedicated following.* We continue to publish Contact: works that assemble new audiences and forge Louise McDermott +44 (0)203 691 2791 new alliances in thought. [email protected] Urbanomic Media Ltd As well as Collapse, our catalogue includes the The Old Lemonade Factory Windsor Quarry groundbreaking series of publications produced Falmouth collaboratively since 2010 with Sequence Press TR11 3EX UK in New York; MONO, a new series of works by www.urbanomic.com emerging contemporary thinkers; and the new Distributor (UK, EU): Central Books, London. REDACTIONS series documenting and extending www.centralbooks.com the ‘research-in-progress’ ethos of Urbanomic’s + 44 (0)845 458 9911 US: Contact Katherine Pickard (Sequence Press) events programme. [email protected] 212.995.1774 Urbanomic is a trading name of Urbanomic Media Ltd, a limited company incorporated * Special thanks to our readers for the in England and Wales with registration number 8928468. Registered office: The Old Lemonade Factory, Windsor Quarry, Falmouth, TR11 3EX, UK. photographs featured in this catalogue. HIGHLIGHTS HIGHLIGHTS Exploring the political heresy of accelerationism, Object-Oriented Philosophy—beyond the hype: from Marx to the contemporary scene. Realist revolution or metaphysical regression? #Accelerate Object-Oriented The Accelerationist Reader Philosophy Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tragic Sublime: Libidinal Pessimism and the Problem
    THE TRAGIC SUBLIME: LIBIDINAL PESSIMISM AND THE PROBLEM OF EXISTENCE By Sean G. Elbourne A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The Faculty of Arts The University of New South Wales 2005 Originality Statement I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged. (Signed)…………………………………………………………….. iii ABSTRACT In this thesis I explore the attempt by Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich Nietzsche and Georges Bataille to confront the problem of the meaning and value of existence. I consider each of these philosophers as involved in the development of a stream of post-Kantian thought that, following Nick Land, I call libidinal pessimism. Libidinal pessimism is both the metaphysical principle of the primacy of willing as the fundamental reality, and the moral principle that the greatest value to our existence is to be found in liberating willing from the small-scale concern of the good of individual beings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speculative Turn Continental Materialism and Realism
    The Speculative Turn Continental Materialism and Realism Edited by Levi Bryant, Nick Srnicek and Graham Harman Open Access Statement – Please Read This book is Open Access. This work is not simply an electronic book; it is the open access version of a work that exists in a number of forms, the traditional printed form being one of them. Copyright Notice This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal aca- demic scholarship without express permission of the author and the publisher of this volume. Furthermore, for any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. For more information see the details of the creative commons licence at this website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ This means that you can: • read and store this document free of charge • distribute it for personal use free of charge • print sections of the work for personal use • read or perform parts of the work in a context where no financial transactions take place However, you cannot: • gain financially from the work in anyway • sell the work or seek monies in relation to the distribution of the work • use the work in any commercial activity of any kind • profit a third party indirectly via use or distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis, Spirit and the End of Europe Benjamin Noys
    Abstract: ‘Europe endless’ is the endlessly deferred promise of Europe C R as a site of rationality and freedom. In the face of the collapse of this I promise it seems most current orientations are trying to ‘end Europe’, S Europe Endless: I either in actuality or at the level of the idea or concept. Here I want to S reconstruct the discourse of the crisis of Europe and the conjoined discourse of the spirit of Europe. This begins with Nietzsche as the & philosopher of Europe as the crisis of nihilism in which Europe must Crisis, Spirit C be traversed to find a new ‘spirit’. This crisis of spirit is projected as a R global crisis to produce a meta-imperial traversal of crisis for the sake of I Europe. Then the analysis moves to Husserl and the phenomenological T I and the End of reading of European ‘spirit’, which treats Europe as a ‘life world’ Q encompassing all others. Here Europe ‘endless’ is expansive and yet U delimited. Finally, I consider the contemporary ‘global’ discourse of E accelerationism, another Nietzschean current that embraces the solvent / Europe forces of technology and abstraction. The ‘spirit’ of Europe is formed Volume 6 / within the forgetting of Europe and, as a result, the turning of the global Issue 1 into Europe. These discourses of ‘spirit’ at once try to end and maintain ‘Europe Endless’. Instead, perhaps posing issues and problems of the actualisation of rationality and freedom might start to grasp the potentialities of ‘Europe endless’ beyond this constantly deferred end. Benjamin Noys Keywords: Europe; Crisis; Nietzsche; Husserl; Accelerationism It seems ironic that at the moment the unifying concern of Europe is how to put an end to Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (12Mb)
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/4333 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism Deepak Narang Sawhney Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph. D. University of Warwick Department of Philosophy May 1996 Contents Acknowledgements Declaration Summary Key to Abbreviations and Thesis Outline i Introduction 1 I Consuming the Future 13 H Body without Organs 50 III The Stratification of the World-Economy 79 IV Geopolitics: Antisysternic Movements of Resistance 116 V Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 152 Concluding Remarks: 174 'Class Consciousness'and 'The American Rhizome' Tables 192 Bibliography 195 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledgeDr. Nick Land for his invaluable support throughout this project, and to my family for their love and patience. Declaration The following is a list of chaptersfrom Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism that are published in abridged form: Chapter HI: 'The Stratification of the World-Economy', in Must Me Burn Sade?,Deepak N Sawhney (ed) (NJ: Humanities Press, 1997) Chapter IV: 'Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance', in Gilles Deleuze and Minoritarian Becomings,
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Pacific Association for the Continental Tradition, Vol
    Journal of the Pacific Association for the Continental Tradition, Vol. 2, 2019 http://hilo.hawaii.edu/jpact ______________________________________________________________________________ After We Drank Up the Sea: Nihilism, Crying, and Laughing Sam Mickey University of San Francisco, California, USA KEYWORDS ABSTRACT Anthropocene, In Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, Nietzsche’s madman proclaims that God is Georges Bataille, dead and we are the murderers. Then he asks a series of questions about extinction, how such an event was possible, including the question, “How were we Friedrich able to drink up the sea?” That question reflects Nietzsche’s insight that Nietzsche, ocean the loss of the true world (God) is also the loss of the apparent world acidification, (nature). This loss marks a transition to the Anthropocene—a geological incontinence epoch in which human impacts extend throughout Earth systems, including Earth’s entire hydrologic system. Petrochemicals are found in the deepest parts of Earth’s oceans while gyres of debris form floating islands on the surface. Drawing primarily on Nietzsche and Bataille, this article 1) diagnoses nihilistic tendencies at work in the worldwide destruction of marine ecosystems (e.g., pollution, ocean acidification, drying seas, and mass extinction), and 2) poses a solution in two practices of oceanic becoming: crying and laughing. Saline tears and oceanic waves of laughter open up possibilities for affirming coexistence in and as the uncertain seas of the Anthropocene. 2 S. MICKEY Learn gradually to discard the supposed individual! Discover the fallacies of the ego! Recognize egoism as fallacy! The opposite is not to be understood as altruism! This would be love of other supposed individuals! No! Get beyond “myself” and “yourself”! Experience cosmically! —Friedrich Nietzsche1 This is my philosophy slogan: thinking should know how to laugh, and cry.
    [Show full text]