DOCSLIB.ORG

July 5, 2016, Municipal Planning Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
July 5, 2016, Municipal Planning Commission MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA July 5, 2016 9:30 AM Page 1.0 CALL TO ORDER 2.0 APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2.1 Additional Agenda Items 3.0 CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES 3 - 8 3.1 Minutes of the Municipal Planning Commission meeting of June 21, 2016. 4.0 BUSINESS FROM THE MINUTES 5.0 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 9 - 15 5.1 Pt NE 32-36-24-4 (Division 1) – application for a front yard setback relaxation for a proposed dwelling (mobile home). 16 - 23 5.2 Pt NE 31-37-23-4 (Division 1) – application to locate a second dwelling (manufactured home). 24 - 31 5.3 Pt NW 18-34-1-5 (Division 4) – application to locate a second dwelling (manufactured home). 32 - 39 5.4 Lot 1, Block 1, Plan 062-7004, SE 6-35-28-4 (Division 4) – application to locate a second dwelling (manufactured home). 40 - 44 5.5 Pt NW 36-37-1-5 (Division 3) – application for a side yard setback relaxation for an existing dwelling. 45 - 52 5.6 Unit 38, Plan 022-1116, NE 25-35-3-5 (Division 5) – application for a gross floor area relaxation and a front yard setback relaxation for the location of a cottage (Gleniffer Lake Resort). 53 - 61 5.7 Lot 1, Block 1, Plan 942-0187, SW 25-36-2-5 (Division 5) – application to operate an artistic blacksmithing business as a Home Business Major. 62 - 70 5.8 Pt SW 13-36-25-4 (Division 1) – application to locate a communication tower (Whispering Pines Resort). 71 - 78 5.9 Pt SW 16-39-27-4 (Division 6) – application to locate a communication tower. 6.0 SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS Page 1 of 87 Municipal Planning Commission Meeting Agenda, July 5, 2016 Page 79 - 87 6.1 Lot 15, Block 10, Plan 122-5165, SE 29-37-27-4 (Division 2) – application to subdivide a 0.65-hectare (1.61-acre) parcel for the development of an extended stay hotel (Gasoline Alley West). 7.0 ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 87 MINUTES OF THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 21, 2016 Red Deer County Council Chambers, Red Deer County Centre Present: Chairman Councillor P.J.R. Massier, Mayor J.J. Wood, Councillors J.M. Bota, C.R. Huelsman, R.R. Lorenz and C. Moore. Absent: Councillor D.B. Church. Staff Present: County Manager C. Herzberg, Assistant County Manager R. Henderson, Planning and Development Services Director D. Dittrick, Corporate Services Director H. Gray-Surkan, Planning and Development Services Administration T. Miller, J. Hardes and T. March and Legislative Services Administration N. Lougheed and L. Thompson. 1.0 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Councillor P.J.R. Massier called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. 2.0 AGENDA MPC-16-089 Moved by Councillor C.R. Huelsman to approve the agenda as submitted. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 3.0 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES MPC-16-090 Moved by Councillor C. Moore to approve the minutes of the June 7, 2016, meeting as submitted. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5.0 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 5.1 Katherine Meadows – Pt NE 26-36-25-4 (Division 1) 2.99 Acres – Agricultural District “Ag” Requesting approval of a front yard setback relaxation for the construction of an accessory building. The property is located approximately 1 mile north of Pine Lake, north of Hwy 42 on Rge Rd 251A. MPC-16-091 Moved by Mayor J.J. Wood to approve the application for a 20.98-metre (68’) front yard setback relaxation for a proposed accessory building on the NW part of NE 26-35-25-4, subject to the following conditions being met to the satisfaction of the Development Officer: 1. The proposed development shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the approved plans and construction drawings including the site layout and building elevations as submitted by the Applicants. 2. Where the development permit is issued for the construction of a building, the exterior of the building, including painting, shall be completed within one year of the date of issue. Minutes of the Municipal Planning Commission meeting of June... Page 3 of 87 Minutes of the Municipal Planning Commission, June 21, 2016 Page 2 3. The subject development shall not alter the existing drainage where water drains onto neighbouring properties. It will be the developer’s responsibility to provide corrective drainage structures, including retaining walls, to divert water from neighbouring properties. 4. The Applicant is to provide any revised construction drawings clearly indicating any changes to the approved drawing set, if applicable. 5. The Development shall be attractive in appearance, shall complement existing buildings located on adjacent parcels, and shall be constructed of materials that comply with the Safety Code Act. 6. The decision being advertised in a local paper and no appeal against said decision being successful. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5.2 Joshua Bullock – Pt NE 8-35-25-4 (Division 1) 5 Acres – Agricultural District “Ag” Requesting approval of front yard setback relaxations for an existing accessory building and dwelling. The property is located approximately 9 miles southwest of Pine Lake, south of Hwy 590 on Twp Rd 352. MPC-16-092 Moved by Mayor J.J. Wood to approve a 12.18-meter (40’) front yard setback relaxation for an existing dwelling and a 20.27-meter (66.5’) front yard setback relaxation for an existing accessory building on Pt NE 8-35-25-4, subject to the decision being advertised in a local paper and no appeal against said decision being successful. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5.3 Dennis and Betty Blais – Lot U20, Plan 052-4444, NE 25-35-3-5 (Division 5) 0.07 Acres – Condominium Resort Residential District “R-7” Requesting approval of a side yard setback relaxation for an existing mobile home and a rear yard setback relaxation for an existing deck. The property is located in the northwest section of the Gleniffer Lake Resort on Rge Rd 30, south of Hwy 54. MPC-16-093 Moved by Councillor R.R. Lorenz to approve a 0.41-metre (1.35’) side yard setback relaxation for an existing mobile home and a 1.1-metre (3.6’) rear yard setback relaxation for an existing deck on Lot U20, Plan 052-4444, NE 25-35-3-5, subject to the decision being advertised in a local paper and no appeal against said decision being successful. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5.4 Aubrey and Bonnie Bickford – NE 32-37-26-4 (Division 2) 156.7 Acres – Agricultural District “Ag” Requesting approval to construct a second dwelling. The property is located approximately 1.5 miles east of the City of Red Deer, east of Rge Rd 265 on Hwy 595. Minutes of the Municipal Planning Commission meeting of June... Page 4 of 87 Minutes of the Municipal Planning Commission, June 21, 2016 Page 3 MPC-16-094 Moved by Councillor J.M. Bota to approve the application to construct a second dwelling on NE 32-37-26-4, subject to the following conditions being met to the satisfaction of the Development Officer: 1. A development permit shall not be issued and construction of the development shall not proceed beyond grade level until all conditions, except those conditions of a continuing nature, have been met or fulfilled. 2. The proposed development shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the attached conceptual plans and with the detailed plans, which are to be prepared pursuant to the conceptual plans and comply with the County’s Design Guidelines & General Construction Specifications. 3. Confirmation that an application and site plan have been submitted to Red Deer County for Rural/Civic Addressing for the new dwelling. 4. Once the permit is issued, the applicant is to provide any revised drawings clearly indicating any changes to the approved drawing set, if applicable. 5. The subject development shall not alter the existing drainage where water drains onto neighbouring properties. It will be the developer’s responsibility to provide corrective drainage structures, including retaining walls, to divert water from neighbouring properties. 6. The Development shall be attractive in appearance, shall complement existing buildings located on adjacent parcels, and shall be constructed of materials that comply with the Safety Code Act. 7. The approved use shall not create a nuisance nor adversely affect the amenities of the district. 8. Failure to comply with the aforementioned conditions will result in Development Permit revocation and the issuance of a stop order pursuant to the Municipal Government Act. 9. The decision being advertised in a local paper and no appeal against said decision being successful. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5.5 Harvey Lind – SW 7-35-27-4 (Division 4) 160 Acres – Agricultural District “Ag” Requesting approval to locate a second dwelling (manufactured home). The property is located approximately 4.5 miles east of the Town of Innisfail, west of Hwy 791 on Rge Rd 280. MPC-16-095 Moved by Councillor C.R. Huelsman to approve the application to locate a second dwelling (manufactured home) on SW 7-35-27-4, subject to the following conditions being met to the satisfaction of the Development Officer: 1. A development permit shall not be issued and construction of the development shall not proceed beyond grade level until all conditions, except those conditions of a continuing nature, have been met or fulfilled. 2. The proposed development shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the attached conceptual plans and with the detailed plans, which are to be prepared pursuant to the conceptual plans and comply with the County’s Design Guidelines & General Construction Specifications. 3. Confirmation that an application and site plan have been submitted to Red Deer County for Rural/Civic Addressing for the new dwelling.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Little Red Deer Subwatershed Red Deer River State of the Watershed Report 4.4 Little Red Deer River Subwatershed
    Little Red Deer Subwatershed Red Deer River State of the Watershed Report 4.4 Little Red Deer River Subwatershed 4.4.1 Watershed Characteristics The Little Red Deer River subwatershed encompasses about 397,166 ha and is located in the Counties of Mountain View and Red Deer and the Municipal Districts of Bighorn No. 8 and Rocky View No. 44 (Figure 112). The Little Red Deer River subwatershed is located south of Gleniffer Lake Reservoir and east of the upper reaches of the Red Deer River. The subwatershed lies in the Subalpine, Upper and Lower Foothills, Foothills Parkland, Dry Mixedwood and Central Parkland Subregions (Figure 113). Soils vary widely, reflecting the great diversity in parent materials and ecological conditions. The vegetation consist of lodgepole pine (P. contorta), Engelmann spruce (P. engelmannii), subalpine fir (A. lasiocarpa) and whitebark pine (P. albicaulis). High elevation grasslands also occur in the Subalpine Subregion. The Upper Foothills Subregion occurs on strongly rolling topography along the eastern edge of the Rocky Mountains. Upland forests are nearly all coniferous and dominated by white spruce (P. glauca), black spruce (P. mariana), lodgepole pine (P. contorta) and subalpine fir (A. lasiocarpa). The Lower Foothills Subregion is dominated by mixed forests of white spruce (P. glauca), black spruce (P. mariana), lodgepole pine (P. contorta), balsam fir (A. balsamea), aspen (Populus spp.), balsam poplar (P. balsamifera) and paper birch (B. papyrifera). The Foothills Parkland is dominated by aspen (Populus spp.), balsam poplar (P. balsamifera) and Bebb willow (S. bebbiana), with a lush understory dominated by a variety of herbaceous plants. Forests in the Dry Mixedwood Subregion are dominated by aspen (Populus spp.), balsam poplar (P.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Storage Opportunities in the South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta
    Water Storage Opportunities in the South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta Submitted to: Submitted by: SSRB Water Storage Opportunities AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Steering Committee a Division of AMEC Americas Limited Lethbridge, Alberta Lethbridge, Alberta 2014 amec.com WATER STORAGE OPPORTUNITIES IN THE SOUTH SASKATCHEWAN RIVER BASIN IN ALBERTA Submitted to: SSRB Water Storage Opportunities Steering Committee Lethbridge, Alberta Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure Lethbridge, Alberta July 2014 CW2154 SSRB Water Storage Opportunities Steering Committee Water Storage Opportunities in the South Saskatchewan River Basin Lethbridge, Alberta July 2014 Executive Summary Water supply in the South Saskatchewan River Basin (SSRB) in Alberta is naturally subject to highly variable flows. Capture and controlled release of surface water runoff is critical in the management of the available water supply. In addition to supply constraints, expanding population, accelerating economic growth and climate change impacts add additional challenges to managing our limited water supply. The South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta Water Supply Study (AMEC, 2009) identified re-management of existing reservoirs and the development of additional water storage sites as potential solutions to reduce the risk of water shortages for junior license holders and the aquatic environment. Modelling done as part of that study indicated that surplus water may be available and storage development may reduce deficits. This study is a follow up on the major conclusions of the South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta Water Supply Study (AMEC, 2009). It addresses the provincial Water for Life goal of “reliable, quality water supplies for a sustainable economy” while respecting interprovincial and international apportionment agreements and other legislative requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Currents Finds a Brand New Home
    Volume 16, No. 2 Spring, 2010 Trout Unlimited Canada’s Currents finds a brand new home Alberta’s Raven River: an example of conservation in action by Phil Rowley he Raven River, a tributary of the threats facing the Raven. The Edmonton The Raven River project was broken Red Deer River, is located in Cen- chapter backed by the Lloyd Shea Fisheries down into four key components. T tral Alberta just west of Red Deer. Enhancement fund looked for additional • Assessment of fish habitat and riparian 1983 saw the completion of the Dickson funding and project partners to begin work (river bank) conditions Dam forming Gleniffer Lake which the on the Raven. • Gaining a measure of the existing brown Raven River now spills into. Flowing over The Lloyd Shea Fisheries Enhancement trout population 102 KM in an easterly direction from the Fund was created in memory of Lloyd Shea, • Assess the relative abundance, diversity slopes of the Rocky Mountains the Raven an ardent fly fisher, hunter, advocate for and distribution of all fish species in the River carries agriculture, forestry and the conservation and founding member of the River oil and gas industry on her shoulders. The Edmonton chapter. In honour of Lloyd’s Photo by Ryan Popowich. Raven is held close to the hearts of local fly memory and legacy Dave Johnston from • Identify critical spawning areas used by fishers as one of Alberta’s premier brown the Fishin’ Hole proposed that the Edmon- brown trout trout fisheries. As with any river system ton chapter establish the fund with their Assessment of existing fish habitat and exposed to human activity the Raven faces assistance, driven by a primary mandate river bank conditions was done both on a number of threats to its health including to conduct studies on brown trout streams foot and through the unique use of a low sedimentation, cattle damage and an over- in central Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in the South SK River Basin
    Water Quality in the South SK River Basin I AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SOUTH SASKATCHEWAN RIVER BASIN I.1 The Saskatchewan River Basin The South Saskatchewan River joins the North Saskatchewan River to form one of the largest river systems in western Canada, the Saskatchewan River System, which flows from the headwater regions along the Rocky Mountains of south-west Alberta and across the prairie provinces of Canada (Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba). The Prairie physiographic region is characterized by rich soils, thick glacial drift and extensive aquifer systems, and a consistent topography of broad rolling hills and low gradients which create isolated surface wetlands. In contrast, the headwater region of the Saskatchewan River (the Western Cordillera physiographic region) is dominated by thin mineral soils and steep topography, with highly connected surface drainage systems and intermittent groundwater contributions to surface water systems. As a result, the Saskatchewan River transforms gradually in its course across the provinces: from its oxygen-rich, fast flowing and highly turbid tributaries in Alberta to a meandering, nutrient-rich and biologically diverse prairie river in Saskatchewan. There are approximately 3 million people who live and work in the Saskatchewan River Basin and countless industries which operate in the basin as well, including pulp and paper mills, forestry, oil and gas extraction, mining (coal, potash, gravel, etc.), and agriculture. As the fourth longest river system in North America, the South Saskatchewan River Basin covers an incredibly large area, draining a surface of approximately 405 860 km² (Partners FOR the Saskatchewan River Basin, 2009). Most of the water that flows in the Saskatchewan River originates in the Rocky Mountains of the Western Cordillera, although some recharge occurs in the prairie regions of Alberta and Saskatchewan through year-round groundwater contributions, spring snow melt in March or April, and summer rainfall in May and early July (J.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Groundwater Flow Model of the Sylvan Lake Sub-Basin in the Edmonton–Calgary Corridor, Central Alberta
    AER/AGS Report 96 Numerical Groundwater Flow Model of the Sylvan Lake Sub- Basin in the Edmonton– Calgary Corridor, Central Alberta AER/AGS Report 96 Numerical Groundwater Flow Model of the Sylvan Lake Sub-Basin in the Edmonton–Calgary Corridor, Central Alberta J.E. Liggett and A. Singh Alberta Energy Regulator Alberta Geological Survey November 2018 ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, 2018 ISBN 978-1-4601-3973-8 The Alberta Energy Regulator / Alberta Geological Survey (AER/AGS), its employees and contractors make no warranty, guarantee or representation, express or implied, or assume any legal liability regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness or reliability of this publication. Any references to proprietary software and/or any use of proprietary data formats do not constitute endorsement by AER/AGS of any manufacturer’s product. If you use information from this publication in other publications or presentations, please acknowledge the AER/AGS. We recommend the following reference format: Liggett, J.E. and Singh, A. (2018): Numerical groundwater flow model of the Sylvan Lake sub-basin in the Edmonton–Calgary Corridor, central Alberta; Alberta Energy Regulator / Alberta Geological Survey, AER/AGS Report 96, 41 p. Published November 2018 by: Alberta Energy Regulator Alberta Geological Survey 4th Floor, Twin Atria Building 4999 – 98th Avenue Edmonton, AB T6B 2X3 Canada Tel: 780.638.4491 Fax: 780.422.1459 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ags.aer.ca/ AER/AGS Report 96 (November 2018) • iii Contents Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Walleye Index Netting at Gleniffer Lake, Alberta, 2012
    Fall Walleye Index Netting at Gleniffer Lake, Alberta, 2012 Fisheries Management Red Deer Area February 28, 2013 Fall Walleye Index Netting at Gleniffer Lake, Alberta, 2012 Fisheries Biologist(s): Jason Cooper, Kelly Dick – Fisheries Management, Red Deer Disclaimer This is a summary report prepared for public distribution by Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Fisheries Management Branch. This report has been peer reviewed, but may be subject to revision pending further data analysis. Abstract A total of 289 fish representing five species were caught during the Fall Walleye Index Netting (FWIN) survey. Walleye were the second most abundant species in the FWIN nets accounting for 37% of the catch. Individual net catches were variable ranging from 0 to 20 Walleye. The catch-per-unit effort (CPUE) for Walleye was 6.2 fish·100m-2·24hrs-1 (95% C.I. 4.0–8.6), which is considerably less than the Alberta mean of 18.6 fish·100m- 2·24hrs-1. Walleye total lengths (TL) (n=107) ranged from 118 to 695 mm and fish over 500 mm TL represented 11% of the catch. The majority of fish were in the 290 to 400 mm TL size category. There were 5 age-classes present (ages 0, 3, 5, 6 and 12) and 27% of the Walleye sampled were mature. Mean age-at-maturity was difficult to determine due to age-class gaps and low sample sizes, but females and males first matured by ages 6 and 5, respectively. Walleye reached a mean TL of 500 mm by age 6 and the growth curve suggests that the asymptotic average maximum body size (Linf) was 926.8 mm TL.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Quantity and Groundwater Resources
    DRAFT Background Technical Report: Surface Water Quantity and Groundwater Resources Prepared for the Red Deer River Integrated Watershed Management Plan SEPTEMBER, 2013 Prepared by: O2 Planning + Design Inc. (O2) in association with Integrated Sustainability Consultants Ltd. and LimnoLogic Solutions Ltd. Prepared for: The Red Deer River Watershed Alliance, in association with Alan Dolan and Associates RDRWA-Background Technical Report: Surface Water Quantity and Groundwater Resources September, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Watershed management requires an effective process to integrate science, policy, and stakeholder and public participation in a flexible manner. The Red Deer River Watershed Alliance and its project manager and facilitator, Alan Dolan, commissioned O2 Planning + Design Inc. (O2) to prepare background technical reports to support the development of an Integrated Watershed Management Plan (IWMP). This report focuses on providing draft outcomes, indicators, and targets for the Red Deer River Watershed for: (i) surface water quantity and (ii) groundwater resources (including groundwater quantity and groundwater quality). Extensive literature review, data assembly, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping were applied to summarize information and help formulate appropriate indicators and targets. In addition, a multidisciplinary technical review process was undertaken to incorporate advice and feedback from provincial subject matter experts in government, industry, and consulting. Recommended outcomes, indicators, and targets for each of the topics are summarized below. The report also outlines, for each topic, priorities for improved monitoring and data acquisition, research needs, and key Beneficial Management Practices (BMPs) recommended for implementation. Surface Water Quantity Surface water resources in the watershed vary considerably in response to seasonal influences, as well as drought and deluge cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic State of Alberta Lakes Based on Average Total Phosphorus
    Created Feb 2013 TROPHIC STATE OF ALBERTA LAKES Based On Average (May-October) Total Phosphorus Concentrations Total Phosphorus (µg/L) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 * Adamson Lake Alix Lake * Amisk Lake * Angling Lake Oligotrophic * ‡ Antler Lake Arm Lake (Low Productivity) * Astotin Lake (<10 µg/L) * ‡ Athabasca (Lake) - Off Delta Baptiste Lake - North Basin Baptiste Lake - South Basin * ‡ Bare Creek Res. Mesotrophic * ‡ Barrier Lake ‡ Battle Lake (Moderate Productivity) * † Battle River Res. (Forestburg) (10 - 35 µg/L) Beartrap Lake Beauvais Lake Beaver Lake * Bellevue Lake Eutrophic * † Big Lake - East Basin * † Big Lake - West Basin (High Productivity) * Blackfalds Lake (35 - 100 µg/L) * † Blackmud Lake * ‡ Blood Indian Res. Bluet (South Garnier Lake) ‡ Bonnie Lake Hypereutrophic † Borden Lake * ‡ Bourque Lake (Very High Productivity) ‡ Buck Lake (>100 µg/L) Buffalo Lake - Main Basin Buffalo Lake - Secondary Bay * † Buffalo Lake (By Boyle) † Burntstick Lake Calling Lake * † Capt Eyre Lake † Cardinal Lake * ‡ Carolside Res. - Berry Creek Res. † Chain Lakes Res. - North Basin † Chain Lakes Res.- South Basin Chestermere Lake * † Chickakoo Lake * † Chickenhill Lake * Chin Coulee Res. * Clairmont Lake Clear (Barns) Lake Clear Lake ‡ Coal Lake * ‡ Cold Lake - English Bay ‡ Cold Lake - West Side ‡ Cooking Lake † Cow Lake * Crawling Valley Res. Crimson Lake Crowsnest Lake * † Cutbank Lake Dillberry Lake * Driedmeat Lake ‡ Eagle Lake ‡ Elbow Lake Elkwater Lake Ethel Lake * Fawcett Lake * † Fickle Lake * † Figure Eight Lake * Fishing Lake * Flyingshot Lake * Fork Lake * ‡ Fox Lake Res. Frog Lake † Garner Lake Garnier Lake (North) * George Lake * † Ghost Res. - Inside Bay * † Ghost Res. - Inside Breakwater ‡ Ghost Res. - Near Cochrane * Gleniffer Lake (Dickson Res.) * † Glenmore Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Implementation of the Approved Water Management Plan for the South Saskatchewan River Basin
    Review of the Implementation of the Approved Water Management Plan for the South Saskatchewan River Basin APPENDICES: Appendix A – Project Scoping Document Appendix B – Parking Lot Appendix C – 10-Year Review Data Analysis Package Appendix D – Notable Initiatives Appendix E – BAC Summaries Appendix F – BAC Members Appendix A – Project Scoping Document SSRB WMP 10 Year Review Project SSRB WMP 10 Year Review Draft Outline v6 8 May 2017 Purpose It has been 10 years since the approval of the South Saskatchewan River Basin Water Management Plan (WMP, Plan). As with all plans, it is prudent that its effectiveness be periodically reviewed. The purpose of this Review is to assess the implementation of the Plan in the Bow River Basin since its inception in 2006 using available data and information. Assess progress against WMP recommendations and intended outcomes based on best available data, including baseline comparison (prior to the implementation of the Plan). Identify information gaps and opportunities. Summarize what the Plan has accomplished since it was implemented in achieving its anticipated outcomes, and what further can be done. This is not a required or approvals related review. This is a WPAC conducted review foreseen, in fact called for, in the original Plan. This is a transparent effort that is within the WPAC responsibilities intended to inform and improve water management in the basin. The Review does not intend to recommend opening up the SSRB WMP nor the Water Act to revision. Rather, it intends to identify where further attention or effort is required to achieve the intended outcomes of the Plan, within the current regulatory framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring for Invasive Mussels in Alberta’S Irrigation Infrastructure: 2017 Report
    Monitoring for Invasive Mussels in Alberta’s Irrigation Infrastructure: 2017 Report Alberta Agriculture and Forestry Water Quality Section Outlet of Sauder Reservoir January 2018 Introduction and Summary The Government of Alberta (GOA) is committed to protecting the province against aquatic invasive species (AIS), due to their negative ecological and economic effects. Invasive zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and quagga mussels (Dreissena bugensis) are of prominent concern, as these dreissenid mussels attach to any solid submerged surface and rapidly multiply due to their high reproductive rates. They are also very difficult to contain and eradicate once established. Additionally, they are spreading closer to Alberta’s borders. Alberta’s irrigation industry contributes $3.6 billion to the provincial gross domestic product (GDP). Specifically, it contributes about 20% of the provincial agri-food sector GDP on 4.7% of the province’s cultivated land base (Paterson Earth & Water Consulting 2015). Alberta’s irrigation industry includes thirteen irrigation districts that supply water to more than 570,000 ha of farmland through infrastructure valued at $3.6 billion. This infrastructure includes 57 irrigation reservoirs along with 3,491 km of canals and 4,102 km of pipelines (ARD 2014; AF 2017). The irrigation conveyance system provides water to irrigators, municipalities, industries, and wetlands, while the reservoirs support recreational activities such as boating and fishing and provide habitat to fish and waterfowl. Invasive mussels are a concern to the irrigation industry as infestations will have a significant negative effect on water infrastructure and conveyance works due to their ability to completely clog pipelines and damage raw-water treatment systems and intakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Carefree Brochure.Indd
    A Friendly Community CLUBHOUSE 10,000 ft2 Clubhouse with kitchen facilities Centrally located with panoramic view MARINE & RV AMENITIES 2 heated pools (full size Carefree Resort and kids) Private boat launch and sheltered marina for 200 boats (operated by is a well established Washroom, shower and sauna facilities Gleniff er Lake Boating Society (year round water availability) Recreational Resort RV and Boat storage compound (fenced & locked) Enjoyable games areas: Condominium on the - Pool table, video games shores of Gleniff er Lake - Sound system & large screen TV NEARBY ACTIVITIES which resulted from Laundry facilities located in Clubhouse and Variety of challenging golf courses the creation of Dickson satellite washhouse Forestry Reserves for biking, ATV’s, snowmobiling Dam. Just 20 km west of Convenience store: (these vehicles cannot be operated on Resort property) - Groceries, coff ee, snacks, propane, etc. Innisfail, Carefree is easily accessible in the heart of Modern water treatment plant EDMONTON (2HRS) West Central Alberta. Only 1.5 hours from Calgary RED DEER and 2 hours from Edmonton. HWY.54 SOCIAL & COMMUNITY EVENTS DICKSON DAM Pancake breakfast, BBQ’s, theme night dinners 31 KM INNISFAIL Weekend dances for kids and adults LITTLE RED DEER RD. Organized activities for our youth COTTONWOOD RD. CAREFREE Game nights RESORT BOWDEN Exercise classes SEC.587 Craft sales CALGARY (1.5HRS) ACIVITIES Boating, waterskiing and swimming Fishing; in the lake, trout pond or nearby rivers Bocce ball, baseball, volleyball, basketball, Phone (403) 227-2100 Fax (403) 227-2107 horseshoes, playgrounds 2540 Twp. Rd. 353 Lakeside tree lined walking/cycling trails Red Deer County, Alberta T4G 0K6 www.carefreeresort.com Condominium (shared) ownership of all common area land, buildings and facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine River Valley Concept Plan and Study 1 Introduction
    MEDICINE RIVER VALLEY CONCEPT PLAN AND STUdy April 2008 prepared by T h e U rban Lab, Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary Project Team: The EVDS Urban Lab University of Calgary Dr. Bev Sandalack Francisco Alaniz Uribe Braden Abrams Reid Blair Marsden Fraser Blyth Matt Knapik Red Deer County Harry Harker Linda Henrickson Denise Bedford We would like to acknowledge the participants in the workshops and open houses whose comments and feedback helped to inform this plan. Thank you for your contributions. C O N T ENT S 1 Introduction Background Legislative & P lanning Framework Approach & Methodology 2 T ownscape Analysis Study Area Visual Inventory Environmental Characteristics Historic and Cultural Resources Settlement/Community P rofiles Land U se Infrastructure Assets, Issues, and O pportunities 3 Area Concept P lan Land U se Concept Nodes & Connections O pen Space System T ourism 4 Guidelines for New Development References and Appendices vi Medicine River Valley Concept Plan and Study 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BackgrOUND Rural lands along the Medicine River are under growing pressure for conversion from traditional large parcel agriculture to small parcel specialty agriculture and hobby farm uses, and there is increasing demand for country residential development opportunities in this region. Red Deer County, which have jurisdiction on these lands, recognizes the need to develop a coordinated approach to preservation and encouragement of agricultural uses and related businesses, respecting evolving markets and trends, the conservation of natural capital, the development of compatible recreational and tourism uses, and, if proven appropriate, the associated development of well-sited rural residential neighbourhoods.
    [Show full text]