How Bird Communities Change in Relation to Vegetation Change

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Bird Communities Change in Relation to Vegetation Change How bird communities change in relation to vegetation change Project Summary Project 1.2.1.4 Scarlet Robin. Photo: Patrick Kavanagh_CC by 2.0_Flickr Research in Brief Why is the research superb parrot. However, as many threatened species have different This project will examine how needed? nesting behaviour and foraging bird communities change at Millions of hectares of land worldwide patterns, it is not well understood woodland restoration sites are cleared of vegetation and exist in what bird species benefit from tree in south-eastern Australia. a highly degraded condition leading plantings and whether their habitat The project will use long-term to loss of biodiversity. In response, requirements are met. datasets to compare changes billions of dollars are spent annually In Australia, land clearing has resulted in the assemblage of woodland by governments and natural resource in the loss of approximately 85% of birds that occupy tree plantings management organisations to ‘white box–yellow box–Blakely’s red with birds that occupy stands actively restore degraded agricultural gum grassy woodland and derived of remnant vegetation. In landscapes. However, the long-term native grassland’ (box gum grassy particular the research will effectiveness of restoring farming woodlands), and what remains investigate: 1) Does bird landscapes for biodiversity is poorly on private property is often highly species richness in plantings understood for the majority of degraded and impacted by ongoing change over time? 2) Does restored ecosystems worldwide. grazing or other threats. the size and shape of the tree Understanding what species planting influence bird species recolonise restored areas is important Actively restoring landscapes that richness over time? 3) Are there as it is often unclear whether these have been extensive cleared is one changes in the occurrence areas support similar species to that part of the solution to reversing loss of individual bird species over of intact areas, support populations of of biodiversity. Organisations such time? 4) Are temporal changes threatened species or whether they as Landcare groups, Local Land in bird species linked to support very different communities. Services, Catchment Management particular life-history attributes Authorities and Greening Australia Habitat restoration has the potential such as body size, nesting have been actively engaged in tree to help reverse the decline of many behaviour and diet? planting programs for the past threatened woodland species such three decades which has resulted as the brown treecreeper and Jacky Winter. Photo: Damian Michael in substantial increases in native The new information that will weather effects. In conjunction with vegetation cover in some regions. emerge from this research will help the bird surveys detailed vegetation However, little information exists on inform future restoration programs assessment are made to link changes what makes an effective tree planting and property vegetation planning in bird communities with changes in for woodland bird communities, throughout the box gum grassy vegetation. Other variables such as and how do different species’ woodland of south-eastern Australia. planting age, planting size and shape, assemblages change over time planting location and planting species Findings from this project will as tree planting mature and shrub composition will be collected and also be disseminated through species senesce or regenerate. used to evaluate changes in the bird public landholder presentations, community. How will the research formal workshops and other communications, including a book Who is involved? help? that focuses on the response of This research will provide new wildlife to restoration programs. • Holbrook Landcare Network information on how bird communities • Murray Local Land Services change over time as tree plantings What research activities continue to mature and the vegetation are being undertaken? • Riverina Local Land Services structure changes. Previous research Bird surveys are being undertaken in south-eastern Australia has found Where is the research across a broad range of tree plantings that many declining woodland species and stands of remnant vegetation in happening? such as the Diamond Firetail, Southern the South-west Slopes of New South The research is being conducted in Whiteface, Jacky Winter, Scarlet Robin, Wales. Bird surveys commenced the South-west Slopes bioregions of Hooded Robin and Eastern Yellow in 2001 and are conducted during southern New South Wales. Robin will utilise tree plantings within both the winter and spring months several years of them being planted. to account for migratory species. When is the research However, few long-term studies exist Surveys are also conducted by two to inform the future trajectories of happening? different observers on two separate woodland bird communities. days to account for observer bias and The project will run for three years, Do these species disappear until 2021. once tree plantings reach a certain age, or do undesirable species such as the hyper-aggressive noisy minor colonise the tree plantings as they begin to mature? What are the implications of such changes for perpetuating the recovery of threatened birds in agricultural regions? These are some of the questions this research will help answer. Further Information For more information please contact [email protected] Ungrazed planting with phalaris. Photo: Damian Michael This project is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme..
Recommended publications
  • Whistler3 Frontcover
    The Whistler is the occasionally issued journal of the Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc. ISSN 1835-7385 The aims of the Hunter Bird Observers Club (HBOC), which is affiliated with Bird Observation and Conservation Australia, are: To encourage and further the study and conservation of Australian birds and their habitat To encourage bird observing as a leisure-time activity HBOC is administered by a Committee: Executive: Committee Members: President: Paul Baird Craig Anderson Vice-President: Grant Brosie Liz Crawford Secretary: Tom Clarke Ann Lindsey Treasurer: Rowley Smith Robert McDonald Ian Martin Mick Roderick Publication of The Whistler is supported by a Sub-committee: Mike Newman (Joint Editor) Harold Tarrant (Joint Editor) Liz Crawford (Production Manager) Chris Herbert (Cover design) Liz Huxtable Ann Lindsey Jenny Powers Mick Roderick Alan Stuart Authors wishing to submit manuscripts for consideration for publication should consult Instructions for Authors on page 61 and submit to the Editors: Mike Newman [email protected] and/or Harold Tarrant [email protected] Authors wishing to contribute articles of general bird and birdwatching news to the club newsletter, which has 6 issues per year, should submit to the Newsletter Editor: Liz Crawford [email protected] © Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc. PO Box 24 New Lambton NSW 2305 Website: www.hboc.org.au Front cover: Australian Painted Snipe Rostratula australis – Photo: Ann Lindsey Back cover: Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva - Photo: Chris Herbert The Whistler is proudly supported by the Hunter-Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority Editorial The Whistler 3 (2009): i-ii The Whistler – Editorial The Editors are pleased to provide our members hopefully make good reading now, but will and other ornithological enthusiasts with the third certainly provide a useful point of reference for issue of the club’s emerging journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenological Shifts Conserve Thermal Niches in North American Birds and Reshape Expectations for Climate-Driven Range Shifts
    Phenological shifts conserve thermal niches in North American birds and reshape expectations for climate-driven range shifts Jacob B. Socolara,1, Peter N. Epanchinb, Steven R. Beissingerc,d, and Morgan W. Tingleya aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269; bOffice of Global Climate Change, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC 20523; cDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; and dMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Edited by Hugh P. Possingham, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia, and approved October 10, 2017 (received for review April 14, 2017) Species respond to climate change in two dominant ways: range another opportunity to track temperature by shifting thermally shifts in latitude or elevation and phenological shifts of life-history constrained life-history events (e.g., nesting in birds) to colder times events. Range shifts are widely viewed as the principal mechanism of year (Fig. 1). This might be the case even if the main adaptive for thermal niche tracking, and phenological shifts in birds and significance of phenological shifts involves resource tracking. other consumers are widely understood as the principal mecha- However, species do not have unrestricted flexibility to adjust nism for tracking temporal peaks in biotic resources. However, their phenology to track temperature. Phenological timing of life- phenological and range shifts each present simultaneous oppor- history events is not always behaviorally plastic or evolutionarily tunities for temperature and resource tracking, although the labile (21). Moreover, consumers face demographic consequences possible role for phenological shifts in thermal niche tracking has if reproduction is not adequately timed with peaks in biotic re- been widely overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Birding Tour Report
    AUSTRALIA’S TOP END Victoria River to Kakadu 9 – 17 October 2009 Tour Leader: Iain Campbell Having run the Northern Territory trip every year since 2005, and multiple times in some years, I figured it really is about time that I wrote a trip report for this tour. The tour program changed this year as it was just so dry in central Australia, we decided to limit the tour to the Top End where the birding is always spectacular, and skip the Central Australia section where birding is beginning to feel like pulling teeth; so you end up with a shorter but jam-packed tour laden with parrots, pigeons, finches, and honeyeaters. Throw in some amazing scenery, rock art, big crocs, and thriving aboriginal culture you have a fantastic tour. As for the list, we pretty much got everything, as this is the kind of tour where by the nature of the birding, you can leave with very few gaps in the list. 9 October: Around Darwin The Top End trip started around three in the afternoon, and the very first thing we did was shoot out to Fogg Dam. This is a wetlands to behold, as you drive along a causeway with hundreds of Intermediate Egrets, Magpie-Geese, Pied Herons, Green Pygmy-geese, Royal Spoonbills, Rajah Shelducks, and Comb-crested Jacanas all close and very easy to see. While we were watching the waterbirds, we had tens of Whistling Kites and Black Kites circling overhead. When I was a child birder and thought of the Top End, Fogg Dam and it's birds was the image in my mind, so it is always great to see the reaction of others when they see it for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIA Queensland & Top End June 22 – July 4, 2013
    Sunrise Birding LLC AUSTRALIA Queensland & Top End June 22 – July 4, 2013 TRIP REPORT Sunrise Birding LLC, PO Box 274, Cos Cob, CT 06807 USA www.sunrisebirding.com 203.453.6724 Sunrise Birding LLC www.sunrisebirding.com AUSTRALIA Queensland & Top End TRIP REPORT June 22 – July 4, 2013 Leaders: Gina Nichol, Steve Bird & Barry Davies HIGHLIGHTS : BIRDS MAMMALS • Rainbow Pitta • Duck-billed Platypus • Gouldian Finch • Sugar Gliders • Hooded Parrot • Striped Possum • Golden Bowerbird • Dingo • Australian Bustard • Small-eared Rock Wallaby • Papuan Frogmouth • Tawny Frogmouth MOMENTS & EXPERIENCES • Chowchilla • Thousands of Brown Noddies and • Spotted Harrier Sooty Terns at Michaelmas Cay • Chestnut-quilled Rock Pigeon • Tawny Frogmouths too close to • Pied Heron believe • Black-necked Stork • Tens of thousands of ducks and • Black-breasted Buzzard geese at Hasties Swamp • Beach Stone Curlew • The Chowchilla dawn chorus • Northern Rosella • Wompoo Fruit Dove on a nest • Double-eyed Fig Parrot • Golden Bowerbird male preening • Lovely Fairywren above our heads! • White-lined Honeyeater • Spotted Harrier flying along with • Fernwren the bus at close range • Arafura Fantail • Victoria's Riflebird displaying • Barking Owl • Aboriginal Art at Kakadu • Victoria's Riflebird Rarities • Cotton Pygmy Goose at Catana Wetland • Freckled Duck at Hastie’s Swamp • Masked Booby at Michaelmas Cay Day 1, June 22 – Cairns area Paul, Darryl, Gina and Steve arrived on the previous day and this morning before breakfast, we walked from our hotel to the Cairns Esplanade before breakfast. Just outside the hotel were male and female Brown Sunrise Birding LLC, PO Box 274, Cos Cob, CT 06807 USA www.sunrisebirding.com 203.453.6724 Honeyeaters and flocks of Rainbow Lorikeets flying over as we crossed the streets heading toward the waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • Top End Adventure 29Th August – 4Th September 2018
    Tracks Birding - Trip Report Top End: August - September 2018 Northern Territory: Top End Adventure 29th August – 4th September 2018 Do I need to say anything more? Gouldian Finch, bird of the trip. Tour Leader: Laurie Ross All photos in this report were taken by Laurie Ross @ Tracks Birding & Photography Tours www.tracksbirding.com.au 0476 110 084 [email protected] 1 Page Tracks Birding - Trip Report Top End: August - September 2018 INTRODUCTION Darwin and the Top End have to be the most under-rated places to bird on the planet and shouldn’t be overlooked by interstate or international birders. On this seven-day tour you have the opportunity to see over 200 species in a week and explore a huge variety of habitats. From the Mangroves, beaches and monsoon forests around Darwin city, world class wetlands like Fogg Dam and Mamukala, Adelaide River and South Alligator River Floodplains, the Sandstone Escarpments of Kakadu National Park to the Outback grassy plains of Victoria River and Timber Creek. Just some of the bird highlights include local endemics like Chestnut-quilled Rock-pigeon, Banded Fruit-dove, White- lined Honeyeater and the beautiful Hooded Parrot, rarities like Yellow-rumped Mannikin, Chestnut-backed Button-quail, Northern Shrike-tit and Red Goshawk and for the colorful bird fans, Purple-crowned Fairy-wren, Rainbow Pitta and of course the spectacular Gouldian Finch. ITINERARY; 29th August Darwin - Mary River Resort 30th August Mary River Resort - Jabiru (Kakadu National Park) 31st August Jabiru – Yellow Water – Pine Creek 1st September Pine Creek – Edith Falls – Katherine – Victoria River 2nd September Victoria River – Gregory National Park – Timber Creek 3rd September Timber Creek - Katherine 4th September Katherine – Darwin www.tracksbirding.com.au 0476 110 084 [email protected] 2 Page Tracks Birding - Trip Report Top End: August - September 2018 DAY 1 - 29th August 2018 After introductions we hit the road to start birding, first stop was Buffalo Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds and Landscape Change: Benchmarking Study of Birds in Revegetated Sites Near Bacchus Marsh, Victoria
    grow west Birds and Landscape Change: Benchmarking study of birds in revegetated sites near Bacchus Marsh, Victoria. 1 Birds and Landscape Change: bench- marking study of birds in revegetated sites near Bacchus Marsh, Victoria. Richard H. Loyn, Edward G. McNabb, Charles E. Silveira, Marilyn Hewish, Dean Hewish and Jennifer Sheridan. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Sustainability & Environment PO Box 137 Heidelberg VIC 3084 For The Grow West Project Port Phillip and Westernport CMA February 2007 2 Summary Bird surveys were conducted on 78 sites in the heavily cleared landscape near Bacchus Marsh (west of Melbourne, Victoria) to document the bird fauna in the early stages of the Grow West revegetation program. Surveys were conducted in summer 2005/06 and winter 2006. The sites represented eight habitats in the landscape (cleared farmland; landcare revegetation or farm forestry aged 0-2 years; landcare revegetation or farm forestry aged 4- 8 years; revegetation aged 10-50 years; remnant forest patches in farmland; and extensive forest). Forest and woodland birds were most common in the latter three habitats, and their numbers increased with stand age in plantations. Open-country birds were most common in remnant forest patches (which they used for nesting and shelter) and were also common in paddocks (where they dispersed to feed), and less so in revegetation aged 0-2 years (with some exceptions, e.g. Richard’s Pipit Anthus novaeseelandiae). Some bird species retain precarious footholds in the entire landscape, and were found at few sites in low numbers. Some of these species favoured revegetation aged 4-8 years (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Nest, Egg and Parental Care of a Nestling in the New Guinean Lesser Ground-Robin Amalocichla Incerta
    Australian Field Ornithology 2019, 36, 24–30 http://dx.doi.org/10.20938/afo36024030 Nest, egg and parental care of a nestling in the New Guinean Lesser Ground-robin Amalocichla incerta Richard H. Donaghey1, 2*, Donna J. Belder3, Tony Baylis4 and Sue Gould5 1Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111 QLD, Australia 280 Sawards Road, Myalla TAS 7325, Australia 3Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia 4628 Utopia Road, Brooweena QLD 4621, Australia 5269 Burraneer Road, Coomba Park NSW 2428, Australia *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. The Lesser Ground-robin Amalocichla incerta (Petroicidae) is endemic to mid-mountain forests in mainland New Guinea. Spectrograms of four songs are depicted. We describe the elevation and nest-site, height above the ground, structure and materials of three nests discovered in the Yopno Urawa Som Conservation Area, Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea, and compare these observations with two previously described nests. All three of the nests in the present study were 1.0–2.1 m above ground. The colour and dimensions of two eggs are described. At one nest with a feathered nestling estimated to be 13–16 days of age, a pair of adults disposed of faecal sacs and provisioned the nestling at a rate of 7.5 feeds per hour. The nestling period of 22 days was similar to that of two other montane New Guinean robins, but longer than that of most temperate and tropical Australian robins. Introduction Pratt 2016), and 1660–2420 m asl on the Huon Peninsula (Freeman et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations of Nesting in the Papuan Flyrobin and the Olive Flyrobin, and Post-Fledging Care in the Torrent Flycatcher, All Endemic to New Guinea
    Observations of nesting in the Papuan Flyrobin and the Olive Flyrobin, and post-fledging care in the Torrent Flycatcher, all endemic to New Guinea Author Donaghey, Richard Published 2017 Journal Title Australian Field Ornithology Version Version of Record (VoR) DOI https://doi.org/10.20938/afo34111115 Copyright Statement © The Author(s) 2017. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author(s). Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/369836 Link to published version http://www.birdlife.org.au/afo/index.php/afo/article/view/2087 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Australian Field Ornithology 2017, 34, 111–115 http://dx.doi.org/10.20938/afo34111115 Observations of nesting in the Papuan Flyrobin and the Olive Flyrobin, and post-fledging care in the Torrent Flycatcher, all endemic to New Guinea Richard H. Donaghey Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111 QLD, Australia Address for correspondence: 80 Sawards Road, Myalla TAS 7325, Australia Email: [email protected] Abstract. The nesting season, nest materials and dimensions, nest-site, and incubation and anti-predator behaviour of the Papuan Flyrobin Devioeca papuana, and nest and egg of the Olive Flyrobin Kempiella flavovirescens, both species endemic to New Guinea, are described. An observation of cooperative post-fledging care of two juvenile Torrent Flycatchers Monachella muelleriana is presented. Incubation feeding occurred in the Papuan Flyrobin and incubation constancy was 54%. Papuan Flyrobin incubation behaviour, such as nest-attentiveness, frequency of nest visits and duration of on- and off-bouts, and nest failure are discussed and compared with those of the Jacky Winter Microeca fascinans, Lemon-bellied Flycatcher M.
    [Show full text]
  • Erroneous Records of the Brown-Tailed Flycatcher from the Northern Territory by I
    September J MASON, Brown-tailed Flycatcher 81 1977 Erroneous Records of the Brown-tailed Flycatcher from the Northern Territory By I. J. MASON. Officer (197 6), discussing the birds seen around Gove Penin­ sula, quotes two members of the party reporting a bird that they were convinced was a Brown-tailed Flycatcher Microeca brun­ neicauda, and not the Lemon-breasted Flycatcher M . fiavigaster nor the Grey Whistler Pachycephala simplex. They did not how­ ever eliminate the Jacky Winter M. leucophaea which was not observed by Officer and party during their stay but has been recorded in this area as an uncommon bird. I find it difficult to understand how some southern state bird watchers can persist in recording the Brown-tailed Flycatcher from the Northern Territory when both competent local amateur and professional ornithologists have demonstrated th at it does not exist there. It would be helpful if southern ornithologists visiting the Nor­ thern Territory on short trips would adopt a more critlcal attitude when publishing sight records in order not to mislead future ob:;ervers and compilers of handbooks and fi eld gu ides. The problem originated when Campbell (1902: 85) first des­ cribed the Brown-tailed Flycatcher from a damaged specimen which presumably was a Grey Whistler and Le Souef ( 1902: 89) descr ~ bed what he presumed were its nest and egg. Since then records of this spec ~ es from the Northern Territory have found their way into the literature time and time again. Church ( 1925) writing about the birds of the Burketown dis­ trict, North Queensland, noted that a cat had brought in a bird which he thought was a Brown-tailed Flycatcher.
    [Show full text]
  • New Guinea & Australia 2019
    Field Guides Tour Report New Guinea & Australia 2019 Oct 8, 2019 to Oct 26, 2019 Jay VanderGaast For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. Nobody wants to miss seeing cassowary, but it was looking like we might until this one wandered onto the beach at Etty Bay and proceeded to forage unconcernedly down the whole length of the beach, accompanied by an entourage of admirers, our group included. What an amazing encounter! Photo by guide Jay VanderGaast. Australia and Papua New Guinea are a natural fit to pair up on a tour such as this. Aside from being close together, they share a similar avifauna, with a lot of families, and a fair number of species, occurring in both countries. On the other hand, they also each have their own distinct flavor, and plenty of endemics, making them both excellent destinations on their own. Quite obviously, no single tour to either country can even come close to cleaning up on the birds, and this tour certainly makes no attempt to do that. It is more a tour of highlights, and one thing is for certain, there were plenty of those everywhere we went! Things started off on a high note on our first outing in the Cairns region, where in addition to a nice list of expected species, we tallied a trio of Lovely Fairywrens at Cattana Wetlands and a gorgeous Little Kingfisher at Yorkey's Knob, and it just kept on rolling from there. A few days later, by the time we moved on to PNG, we'd enjoyed a close encounter with an imposing Southern Cassowary at Etty Bay, admired the brilliant colors of Wompoo and Rose-crowned Fruit-Doves, had an impromptu photos session with a stunning Spotted Harrier, and been introduced to an assortment of range-restricted specialties of the Atherton Tablelands, from quirky Chowchillas kicking leaves around in the understory, to the display of a shimmering male Victoria's Riflebird, to the construction prowess of a Golden Bowerbird.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Guide for Landholders in the Plains and Box-Ironbark Regions of the Goulburn Broken Catchment GBCMA, Shepparton
    11 Citation Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority, 2003 A Wildlife Guide for Landholders in the plains and box-ironbark regions of the Goulburn Broken Catchment GBCMA, Shepparton Funding for this booklet was provided through the WWFs Threatened Species Network (TSN) Community Grants Scheme, the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) and the Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority The TSN is a community based program of the Commonwealth Governments Natural Heritage Trust and WWF Australia First printed 2003 Copyright of photographs remains with the photographers mentioned in the text Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance, but Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority and the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purpose and therefore disclaim all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise for you relying on any information in this publication Authors Doug Robinson, Trust for Nature & Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE), Kate Stothers, Department of Primary Industries (DPI) and Marion Howell, GBCMA Acknowledgements This booklet was prepared with assistance from: Jerry Alexander, DSE; Kate Bell, Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority (GB CMA); Andrew Bennett, Deakin University; Sue Berwick, DSE; Geoff Brown, DSE; Debbie Colbourne, DSE; Lisa McKenzie, Impress Publicity; Rebecca Nicoll, GB CMA; Bill OConnor, DSE; Stephen Platt, DSE; Helen Repacholi, DPI; Helen Reynolds,
    [Show full text]
  • Disease Risk Analysis for Birds at Ramsar Wetlands in Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula
    Disease Risk Analysis for Birds at Ramsar Wetlands in Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula 11 - 12 March 2020 Disclaimer This Disease Risk Analysis (DRA) Worksheet has been developed by Auckland Zoo on behalf of the IUCN-SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group (CPSG) to provide a structured template for the capture of outputs from wildlife disease risk analyses. CPSG encourages the sharing of completed DRAs using this template to assist other and progress the science of wildlife DRA, no responsibility is accepted for the validity of data, opinions or recommendations contained therein. Anyone who wishes to make their completed DRAs available to others can contact the CPSG office at [email protected] Wiethoelter A, Whiteley P, Gang R and Jakob-Hoff R (2020) Disease Risk Analysis for Birds at Ramsar Wetlands in Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula. IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Cover photo ©: Anke Wiethoelter This report can be downloaded from the CPSG website: www.cpsg.org. 2 PPBBP Ramsar Wetland DRA, 2020 Table of Contents 37TList of Figures37T ............................................................................................................................................... 4 37TList of Tables37T ................................................................................................................................................ 5 37TACKNOWLEDMENTS37T ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]