Disease Risk Analysis for Birds at Ramsar Wetlands in Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Disease Risk Analysis for Birds at Ramsar Wetlands in Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Disease Risk Analysis for Birds at Ramsar Wetlands in Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula 11 - 12 March 2020 Disclaimer This Disease Risk Analysis (DRA) Worksheet has been developed by Auckland Zoo on behalf of the IUCN-SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group (CPSG) to provide a structured template for the capture of outputs from wildlife disease risk analyses. CPSG encourages the sharing of completed DRAs using this template to assist other and progress the science of wildlife DRA, no responsibility is accepted for the validity of data, opinions or recommendations contained therein. Anyone who wishes to make their completed DRAs available to others can contact the CPSG office at [email protected] Wiethoelter A, Whiteley P, Gang R and Jakob-Hoff R (2020) Disease Risk Analysis for Birds at Ramsar Wetlands in Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula. IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Cover photo ©: Anke Wiethoelter This report can be downloaded from the CPSG website: www.cpsg.org. 2 PPBBP Ramsar Wetland DRA, 2020 Table of Contents 37TList of Figures37T ............................................................................................................................................... 4 37TList of Tables37T ................................................................................................................................................ 5 37TACKNOWLEDMENTS37T .................................................................................................................................... 7 37TEXECUTIVE SUMMARY37T ................................................................................................................................. 8 37TINTRODUCTION37T ........................................................................................................................................... 9 37TPROBLEM DESCRIPTION37T ............................................................................................................................ 10 37THAZARD IDENTIFICATION37T .......................................................................................................................... 19 37TRISK ASSESSMENTS37T .................................................................................................................................... 39 37TRisk assessment – Botulism37T ................................................................................................................... 39 37TRisk assessment – Pasteurellosis37T ........................................................................................................... 50 37TRisk assessment – Pollutants37T ................................................................................................................. 61 37TRECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS37T ............................................................................................... 74 37TRISK COMMUNICATION37T ............................................................................................................................. 79 37TREFERENCES37T .............................................................................................................................................. 82 37TAPPENDICES37T ............................................................................................................................................... 93 37TAPPENDIX 1. SPECIES LIST37T ...................................................................................................................... 93 37TAPPENDIX 2. HAZARD LIST37T ................................................................................................................... 126 37TAPPENDIX 3. DISEASE SUMMARIES37T ..................................................................................................... 153 37TAPPENDIX 4. WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS37T ............................................................................................ 211 37TAPPENDIX 5. WORKSHOP SCHEDULE37T .................................................................................................. 213 3 PPBBP Ramsar Wetland DRA, 2020 List of Figures Figure 1. Disease risk analysis process steps ................................................................................................ 9 Figure 2. Map of the Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Ramsar site .............. 10 Figure 3. Interactions between waterbirds, wildlife, livestock, domestic animals, and humans. ............. 14 Figure 4. Reported bird deaths from the Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Ramsar site and immediate surrounding areas, 2005-2019. ..................................................................... 14 Figure 5. Hazard transmission pathways and critical control points (CCPs) for botulism. ......................... 34 Figure 6. Hazard transmission pathways and critical control points (CCPs) for pasteurellosis. ................. 36 Figure 7. Hazard transmission pathways and critical control points (CCPs) for pollutants........................ 37 Figure 8. Risk assessment matrix combining release, exposure and consequence assessment. .............. 40 Figure 9. Timelines for management action and research plans for botulism, pasteurellosis and pollutants. ................................................................................................................................................... 74 Figure 10. Angiostrongyliasis transmission cycle ..................................................................................... 200 4 PPBBP Ramsar Wetland DRA, 2020 List of Tables Table 1. Diagnoses in birds at the Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Ramsar site. ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Table 2. Managing agencies for the Port Phillip Bay (Western Shoreline) and Bellarine Peninsula Ramsar wetland site. ............................................................................................................................................... 18 Table 3. Hazard prioritization criteria for wild birds at PPBBP Ramsar site ............................................... 20 Table 4. Risk prioritization matrix for shore and water-based birds. ......................................................... 21 Table 5. Risk prioritization matrix for land-based birds ............................................................................. 22 Table 6. Risk prioritization matrix for predators. ....................................................................................... 23 Table 7. Comparison of hazard prioritisation rationales across the three functional bird groups. ........... 24 Table 8. Highest-ranking hazards identified by each functional bird group. ............................................. 33 Table 9. Critical control points (CCPs) in the hazard transmission pathways of botulism. ........................ 35 Table 10. Critical control points (CCPs) in the hazard transmission pathway of pasteurellosis................. 36 Table 11. Critical control points (CCPs) in the hazard transmission pathways of pollutants. .................... 37 Table 12. Knowledge gaps and measures to reduce uncertainty in this risk assessment for botulism. .... 41 Table 13. Environment, agent and host factors for botulism..................................................................... 42 Table 14. Risk management option evaluation for botulism to wild birds at the PPBBP Ramsar site. ...... 44 Table 15. Risk management action plan for botulism to wild birds at the PPBBP Ramsar site. ................ 46 Table 16. Action plan addressing knowledge gaps for botulism to wild birds at the PPBBP Ramsar site. 48 Table 17. Knowledge gaps and measures to reduce uncertainty in this risk assessment for pasteurellosis. .................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Table 18. Environment, agent and host factors for pasteurellosis. ........................................................... 53 Table 19. Risk management option evaluation for pasteurellosis to wild birds at the PPBBP Ramsar site. .................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Table 20. Management action plan for pasteurellosis to wild birds at the PPBBP Ramsar site. ............... 58 Table 21. Action plan addressing knowledge gaps for pasteurellosis to wild birds at the PPBBP Ramsar site. ............................................................................................................................................................. 59 Table 22. Knowledge gaps and measures to reduce uncertainty in this risk assessment for pollutants ... 63 Table 23. Environment, agent and host factors for pollutants and contaminants. ................................... 64 Table 24. Risk management option evaluation for pollutants to wild birds at the PPBBP Ramsar site..... 66 Table 25. Management action plan for pollutants to wild birds at the PPBBP Ramsar site. ..................... 70 Table 26. Action plan addressing knowledge gaps for pollutants to wild birds at the PPBBP Ramsar site. ...................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • In This Issue Birds SA Aims To: • Promote the Conservation of a SPECIAL BUMPER CHRISTMAS Australian Birds and Their Habitats
    Linking people with birds in South Australia The Birder No 240 November 2016 In this Issue Birds SA aims to: • Promote the conservation of A SPECIAL BUMPER CHRISTMAS Australian birds and their habitats. ISSUE — LOTS OF PHOTOS • Encourage interest in, and develop knowledge of, the birds of South Australia. PLEASE VOLUNTEER — THE BIRDS • Record the results of research into NEED YOUR HELP! all aspects of bird life. • Maintain a public fund called the A NATIONAL PARK IN THE “Birds SA Conservation Fund” for INTERNATIONAL BIRD SANCTUARY the specific purpose of supporting the Association’s environmental objectives. CO N T E N T S N.B. ‘THE BIRDER’ will not be President’s Message 3 published in February 2017. The Birds SA Notes & News 4 next issue of this newsletter will be The Laratinga Birdfair 8 distributed at the March General Kangaroos at Sandy Creek CP. 9 Meeting, on 31 March 2017. Return of the Adelaide Rosella 10 Giving them wings 11 Cover photo Past General Meetings 13 Emu, photographed by Barbara Bansemer in Future General Meetings 15 Brachina Gorge, Flinders Ranges, on 26th Past Excursions 16 October 2016. Future Excursions 23 Bird Records 25 New Members From the Library 28 We welcome 25 new members who have About our Association 30 recently joined the Association. Their names are listed on p29. Photos from Members 31 CENTRE INSERT: SAOA HISTORICAL SERIES No: 58, JOHN SUTTON’S OUTER HARBOR NOTES, PART 8 DIARY The following is a list of Birds SA activities for the next few months. Further details of all these activities can be found later in ‘The Birder’.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Diurnal Raptors and Airports
    Australian diurnal raptors and airports Photo: John Barkla, BirdLife Australia William Steele Australasian Raptor Association BirdLife Australia Australian Aviation Wildlife Hazard Group Forum Brisbane, 25 July 2013 So what is a raptor? Small to very large birds of prey. Diurnal, predatory or scavenging birds. Sharp, hooked bills and large powerful feet with talons. Order Falconiformes: 27 species on Australian list. Family Falconidae – falcons/ kestrels Family Accipitridae – eagles, hawks, kites, osprey Falcons and kestrels Brown Falcon Black Falcon Grey Falcon Nankeen Kestrel Australian Hobby Peregrine Falcon Falcons and Kestrels – conservation status Common Name EPBC Qld WA SA FFG Vic NSW Tas NT Nankeen Kestrel Brown Falcon Australian Hobby Grey Falcon NT RA Listed CR VUL VUL Black Falcon EN Peregrine Falcon RA Hawks and eagles ‐ Osprey Osprey Hawks and eagles – Endemic hawks Red Goshawk female Hawks and eagles – Sparrowhawks/ goshawks Brown Goshawk Photo: Rik Brown Hawks and eagles – Elanus kites Black‐shouldered Kite Letter‐winged Kite ~ 300 g Hover hunters Rodent specialists LWK can be crepuscular Hawks and eagles ‐ eagles Photo: Herald Sun. Hawks and eagles ‐ eagles Large ‐ • Wedge‐tailed Eagle (~ 4 kg) • Little Eagle (< 1 kg) • White‐bellied Sea‐Eagle (< 4 kg) • Gurney’s Eagle Scavengers of carrion, in addition to hunters Fortunately, mostly solitary although some multiple strikes on aircraft Hawks and eagles –large kites Black Kite Whistling Kite Brahminy Kite Frequently scavenge Large at ~ 600 to 800 g BK and WK flock and so high risk to aircraft Photo: Jill Holdsworth Identification Beruldsen, G (1995) Raptor Identification. Privately published by author, Kenmore Hills, Queensland, pp. 18‐19, 26‐27, 36‐37.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Intense Nest Predation in the Decline of Scarlet Robins and Eastern Yellow Robins in Remnant Woodland Near Armidale, New South Wales
    The role of intense nest predation in the decline of Scarlet Robins and Eastern Yellow Robins in remnant woodland near Armidale, New South Wales S. J. S. DEBDSI A study of open-nesting Eastern Yellow Robins Eopsaltria australis and Scarlet Robins Petroica multicolor, on the New England Tablelands of New South Wales in 2000-02, found Iow breeding success typical of eucalypt woodland birds. The role of intense nest predation in the loss of birds from woodland fragments was investigated by means of predator-exclusion cages at robin nests, culling of Pied Currawongs Strepera graculina, and monitoring of fledging and recruitment in the robins. Nest-cages significantly improved nest success (86% vs 20%) and fledging rate (1.6 vs 0.3 fledglings per attempt) for both robin species combined (n = 7 caged, 20 uncaged). For both robin species combined, culling of currawongs produced a twofold difference in nest success (33% vs 14%), a higher fledging rate (0.5 vs 0.3 per attempt), and a five-day difference in mean nest survival (18 vs 13 days) (n = 62 nests), although sample sizes for nests in the cull treatment (n = 18) were small and nest predation continued. Although the robin breeding population had not increased one year after the cull, the pool of Yellow Robin recruits in 2001-03, after enhanced fledging success, produced two emigrants to a patch where Yellow Robins had become extinct. Management to assist the conservation of open-nesting woodland birds should address control of currawongs. Key words: Woodland birds, Habitat fragmentation, Nest predation, Predator exclusion, Predator removal.
    [Show full text]
  • Whistler3 Frontcover
    The Whistler is the occasionally issued journal of the Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc. ISSN 1835-7385 The aims of the Hunter Bird Observers Club (HBOC), which is affiliated with Bird Observation and Conservation Australia, are: To encourage and further the study and conservation of Australian birds and their habitat To encourage bird observing as a leisure-time activity HBOC is administered by a Committee: Executive: Committee Members: President: Paul Baird Craig Anderson Vice-President: Grant Brosie Liz Crawford Secretary: Tom Clarke Ann Lindsey Treasurer: Rowley Smith Robert McDonald Ian Martin Mick Roderick Publication of The Whistler is supported by a Sub-committee: Mike Newman (Joint Editor) Harold Tarrant (Joint Editor) Liz Crawford (Production Manager) Chris Herbert (Cover design) Liz Huxtable Ann Lindsey Jenny Powers Mick Roderick Alan Stuart Authors wishing to submit manuscripts for consideration for publication should consult Instructions for Authors on page 61 and submit to the Editors: Mike Newman [email protected] and/or Harold Tarrant [email protected] Authors wishing to contribute articles of general bird and birdwatching news to the club newsletter, which has 6 issues per year, should submit to the Newsletter Editor: Liz Crawford [email protected] © Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc. PO Box 24 New Lambton NSW 2305 Website: www.hboc.org.au Front cover: Australian Painted Snipe Rostratula australis – Photo: Ann Lindsey Back cover: Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva - Photo: Chris Herbert The Whistler is proudly supported by the Hunter-Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority Editorial The Whistler 3 (2009): i-ii The Whistler – Editorial The Editors are pleased to provide our members hopefully make good reading now, but will and other ornithological enthusiasts with the third certainly provide a useful point of reference for issue of the club’s emerging journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Cholera (Chapter 7)
    Chapter 7 Avian Cholera Synonyms 24–48 hours is more common. Susceptibility to infection and Fowl cholera, avian pasteurellosis, avian hemorrhagic the course of disease — whether or not it is acute or chronic septicemia — is dependent upon many factors including sex, age, ge- netic variation, immune status from previous exposure, con- Cause current infection, nutritional status, and other aspects of the Avian cholera is a contagious disease resulting from in- host; strain virulence and other aspects of the bacterium; and fection by the bacterium Pasteurella multocida. Several sub- dose and route of exposure. Infection in poultry generally species of bacteria have been proposed for P. multocida, and results when P. multocida enters the tissues of birds through at least 16 different P. multocida serotypes or characteristics the mucous membranes of the pharynx or upper air passages. of antigens in bacterial cells that differentiate bacterial vari- The bacterium can also enter through the membranes of the ants from each other have been recognized. The serotypes eye or through cuts and abrasions in the skin. It is assumed are further differentiated by other methods, including DNA that transmission is similar in wild birds. fingerprinting. These evaluations are useful for studying the Environmental contamination from diseased birds is a ecology of avian cholera (Fig. 7.1), because different sero- primary source for infection. High concentrations of types are generally found in poultry and free-ranging migra- P. multocida can be found for several weeks in waters where tory birds. These evaluations also show that different P. waterfowl and other birds die from this disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Invertebrates and Waterbirds of Wetlands and Rivers of the Southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia
    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.61.2000.217-265 Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 61: 217-265 (2000). Aquatic invertebrates and waterbirds of wetlands and rivers of the southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia 3 3 S.A. Halsel, R.J. ShieF, A.W. Storey, D.H.D. Edward , I. Lansburyt, D.J. Cale and M.S. HarveyS 1 Department of Conservation and Land Management, Wildlife Research Centre, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, Western Australia 6946, Australia 2CRC for Freshwater Ecology, Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, PO Box 921, Albury, New South Wales 2640, Australia 3 Department of Zoology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Australia 4 Hope Entomological Collections, Oxford University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford OXl 3PW, United Kingdom 5 Department of Terrestrial Invertebrates, Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia Abstract - Fifty-six sites, representing 53 wetlands, were surveyed in the southern Carnarvon Basin in 1994 and 1995 with the aim of documenting the waterbird and aquatic invertebrate fauna of the region. Most sites were surveyed in both winter and summer, although some contained water only one occasion. Altogether 57 waterbird species were recorded, with 29 292 waterbirds of 25 species on Lake MacLeod in October 1994. River pools were shown to be relatively important for waterbirds, while many freshwater claypans were little used. At least 492 species of aquatic invertebrate were collected. The invertebrate fauna was characterized by the low frequency with which taxa occurred: a third of the species were collected at a single site on only one occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenological Shifts Conserve Thermal Niches in North American Birds and Reshape Expectations for Climate-Driven Range Shifts
    Phenological shifts conserve thermal niches in North American birds and reshape expectations for climate-driven range shifts Jacob B. Socolara,1, Peter N. Epanchinb, Steven R. Beissingerc,d, and Morgan W. Tingleya aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269; bOffice of Global Climate Change, US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC 20523; cDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; and dMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Edited by Hugh P. Possingham, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia, and approved October 10, 2017 (received for review April 14, 2017) Species respond to climate change in two dominant ways: range another opportunity to track temperature by shifting thermally shifts in latitude or elevation and phenological shifts of life-history constrained life-history events (e.g., nesting in birds) to colder times events. Range shifts are widely viewed as the principal mechanism of year (Fig. 1). This might be the case even if the main adaptive for thermal niche tracking, and phenological shifts in birds and significance of phenological shifts involves resource tracking. other consumers are widely understood as the principal mecha- However, species do not have unrestricted flexibility to adjust nism for tracking temporal peaks in biotic resources. However, their phenology to track temperature. Phenological timing of life- phenological and range shifts each present simultaneous oppor- history events is not always behaviorally plastic or evolutionarily tunities for temperature and resource tracking, although the labile (21). Moreover, consumers face demographic consequences possible role for phenological shifts in thermal niche tracking has if reproduction is not adequately timed with peaks in biotic re- been widely overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Birds of Barrow Island
    A Guide to the Birds of Barrow Island Operated by Chevron Australia This document has been printed by a Sustainable Green Printer on stock that is certified carbon in joint venture with neutral and is Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) mix certified, ensuring fibres are sourced from certified and well managed forests. The stock 55% recycled (30% pre consumer, 25% post- Cert no. L2/0011.2010 consumer) and has an ISO 14001 Environmental Certification. ISBN 978-0-9871120-1-9 Gorgon Project Osaka Gas | Tokyo Gas | Chubu Electric Power Chevron’s Policy on Working in Sensitive Areas Protecting the safety and health of people and the environment is a Chevron core value. About the Authors Therefore, we: • Strive to design our facilities and conduct our operations to avoid adverse impacts to human health and to operate in an environmentally sound, reliable and Dr Dorian Moro efficient manner. • Conduct our operations responsibly in all areas, including environments with sensitive Dorian Moro works for Chevron Australia as the Terrestrial Ecologist biological characteristics. in the Australasia Strategic Business Unit. His Bachelor of Science Chevron strives to avoid or reduce significant risks and impacts our projects and (Hons) studies at La Trobe University (Victoria), focused on small operations may pose to sensitive species, habitats and ecosystems. This means that we: mammal communities in coastal areas of Victoria. His PhD (University • Integrate biodiversity into our business decision-making and management through our of Western Australia)
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices, Glossary and Index
    7 Appendices Appendix A: Agency resourcing statement 2010–11 Appendix B: Portfolio Budget Statements reporting 2010–11 Appendix C: Ecologically sustainable development and environmental performance Appendix D: Freedom of information statement Appendix E: Compliance index Christmas Island red crabs. Photo: Parks Australia Appendix A: Agency Resourcing Statement 2010–11 The Agency Resourcing Statement was introduced to Portfolio Budget Statements in 2008–09 to provide information about the various funding sources that the Director of National Parks may draw upon during the year. The Director of National Parks is required to publish the Agency Resourcing Statement in the annual report that reconciles to cash reserves in the financial statements. Actual available Payments Balance appropriation Made Remaining $’000 $’000 $’000 Opening balance/Reserves at bank 38,353 – 38,353 REVENUE FROM GOVERNMENT Ordinary annual services¹ Outcome 1 – – – Total ordinary annual services – – – Other services² Non-operating 2,249 – 2,249 Total other services 2,249 – 2,249 Total annual appropriations 2,249 – 2,249 Payments from related entities3 Amounts from the portfolio department 46,444 46,444 (0) Total 46,444 46,444 (0) Total funds from Government 46,444 46,444 (0) FUNDS FROM OTHER SOURCES Interest 1,575 1,575 – Sale of goods and services 15,486 15,486 – Other 2,328 1,390 938 Total 19,389 18,451 938 Total net resourcing for DNP 106,435 64,895 41,540 All figures are GST exclusive As per the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Section 514S, DSEWPaC is directly appropriated the Director of National Parks (DNP) appropriations, which is then allocated to the DNP by the Secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • House Crow E V
    No. 2/2008 nimal P A e l s a t n A o l i e t 1800 084 881 r a t N Animal Pest Alert F reecall House Crow E V I The House Crow (Corvus splendens) T is also known as the Indian, Grey- A necked, Ceylon or Colombo Crow. It is not native to Australia but has been transported here on numerous occasions on ships. The T N House Crow has signifi cant potential to establish O populations in Australia and become a pest, so it is important to report any found in the wild. NOTN NATIVE PHOTO: PETRI PIETILAINEN E Australian Raven V I T A N Adult Immature PHOTO: DUNCAN ASHER / ALAMY PHOTO: IAN MONTGOMERY Please report all sightings of House Crows – Freecall 1800 084 881 House Crow nimal P A e l s a t n A o l i e t 1800 084 881 r a Figure 1. The distribution of the House Crow including natural t N (blue) and introduced (red) populations. F reecall Description Distribution The House Crow is 42 to 44 cm in length (body and tail). It has The House Crow is well-known throughout much of its black plumage that appears glossy with a metallic greenish natural range. It occurs in central Asia from southern coastal blue-purple sheen on the forehead, crown, throat, back, Iran through Pakistan, India, Tibet, Myanmar and Thailand to wings and tail. In contrast, the nape, neck and lower breast southern China (Figure 1). It also occurs in Sri Lanka and on are paler in colour (grey tones) and not glossed (Figure 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Development Victoria Annual Report RDV Annual Report 2006/07
    2006/07 Regional Development Victoria Annual Report RDV Annual Report 2006/07 Contents Section 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................4 1.1 Chief Executive Foreword ..............................................................................................................5 Section 2.0 Overview of Regional Development Victoria ....................................................................................8 2.1 Profi le of Regional Development Victoria .........................................................................................9 2.2 Structure of Regional Development Victoria ..................................................................................10 2.3 Regional Development Advisory Committee .................................................................................12 Section 3.0 Year In Review ............................................................................................................................14 3.1 Highlights 2006/07 .....................................................................................................................15 3.2 Case Studies 2006/07 ................................................................................................................31 3.3 Regional Infrastructure Development Fund projects in review .........................................................44 3.4 Small Towns Development Fund projects in review .......................................................................51
    [Show full text]