DOCSLIB.ORG

Australian Ramsar Site Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Australian Ramsar Site Guidelines AUSTRALIAN RAMSAR SITE NOMINATION GUIDELINES Module 4 of the National Guidelines for Ramsar Wetlands— Implementing the Ramsar Convention in Australia WAT251.0912 Published by While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population the contents of this publication are factually correct, the and Communities Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy GPO Box 787 or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable CANBERRA ACT 2601 for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Endorsement Endorsed by the Standing Council on Environment and Citation Water, 2012. Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population Copyright © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 and Communities (2012). Australian Ramsar Site Nomination Guidelines. Module 4 of the National Guidelines for Ramsar Information contained in this publication may be copied or Wetlands—Implementing the Ramsar Convention in Australia. reproduced for study, research, information or educational Australian Government Department of Sustainability, purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgment of the Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra. source. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: ISBN: 978-1-921733-66-6 Assistant Secretary The publication can be accessed at http://www.environment. Aquatic Systems Policy Branch gov.au/water/topics/wetlands/ramsar-convention/australian- Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population guidelines.html and Communities GPO Box 787 Photo credits CANBERRA ACT 2601 Eighty-mile Beach, Pg 3, Sarah Stuart-Smith Blue Lake, Kosciuszko National Park, Pg 6, John Baker Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are Pulu Keeling National Park, Pg 7, Robert Thorn those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Crocodile at Yellow Waters Lagoon, Kakadu National Park, the Australian Government or the Minister for Sustainability, Pg 11, Michelle McAulay Environment, Water, Population and Communities. Marlgu Billabong, Parry Lagoons, Ord River Floodplain, Pg 14, Jim Mollison Hosnies Springs (Christmas Island), Pg 22, Max Orchard Acknowledgments The framework was developed by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities with the assistance of the Wetlands and Waterbirds Taskforce. Wetlands and Waterbirds Taskforce John Foster—chair (Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities), Lisa Evans (Australian Capital Territory Department of Territory and Municipal Services), Alison Curtin (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Brydie Hill (Northern Territory Department of Natural Resources, Environment and the Arts), Mike Ronan (Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection), Paul Wainwright (South Australian Department for Environment and Natural Resources), Stewart Blackhall (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment), Janet Holmes (Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment), Michael Coote (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), and Colin O’Donnell (New Zealand Department of Conservation). 1 Table of contents Governance 15 Management Planning 16 Executive summary 3 Consultation on the plan 16 1 Introduction 4 Management system 16 1.1. Purpose 4 7.5. Summary of consultative outcomes 16 1.2. The Ramsar Convention 4 8 Jurisdiction review and submission of proposed 1.3. The Ramsar Convention in Australia 4 nomination 17 1.4. Wetland definition 5 9 Australian Government review of the proposed 1.5. Ramsar listing—benefits 5 nomination 17 1.6. Ramsar listing—obligations and responsibilities 10 Ramsar site designation 17 in the Australian context 6 10.1. Gazettal of the Ramsar site 17 Australian Government 6 10.2. Site included as part of the Australian Wetlands State Governments 7 Database 17 Site Managers/Landowners 7 11 Updating information and ongoing reporting requirements 17 2 Nomination requirements 8 11.1. Ramsar Information Sheet 17 2.1. Who can nominate a Ramsar site? 8 11.2. Change in ecological character 18 2.2. Who can designate a Ramsar site? 8 11.3. Site reporting 18 2.3. Documentation requirements 8 12 References 18 3 The nomination process 8 Glossary 19 4 Identify candidate Ramsar sites 10 Checklist for Candidate Ramsar Sites 23 4.1. Site identification and initial assessment against Ramsar criteria 10 5 Intent to nominate and landowner(s) support 11 5.1. Obtain in-principle support from landowner 11 Acronyms and Abbreviations 5.2. Seek support from relevant state governments CoP The Conference of the Contracting Parties to the of the intent to nominate 11 Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) 5.3. Notify the Australian Government of the intent to nominate 11 DSEWPaC Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities 6 Broader consultation 12 ECD Ecological Character Description 6.1. Traditional Owner consent 12 EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity 6.2. Objections/grievances 12 Conservation Act 1999 7 Develop supporting documents 12 NGO Non government organisation 7.1. Preparing the Ramsar information sheet 12 RIS Ramsar Information Sheet Listing criteria 12 VCA Voluntary Conservation Agreement 7.2. Ramsar site boundary description and map 13 Determine the boundaries of the site 13 Cluster of wetlands 13 Verify the land tenure 13 Document the process 14 Describe the boundary of the site 14 Map the Boundary 15 7.3. Ecological character description 15 7.4. Management plan or management system 15 2 Executive summary The development of a Ramsar site nomination should be the result of a collaborative process between site managers/ The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance landowners and the Australian and state or territory Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar (Iran), 2 February 1971, governments. Consultation with the landowner(s) and key the Ramsar Convention) encourages the designation of sites stakeholders is an important consideration in both the preparation containing representative, rare or unique wetlands, or wetlands of a Ramsar nomination and the negotiation of ongoing that are important for conserving biological diversity to the List management arrangements for the site. of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar List). These To add a wetland to the Ramsar List there needs to be clear sites are commonly known as Ramsar sites. evidence that the site is internationally important by providing The Ramsar Convention is seen by the international community adequate justification that the site meets at least one of as the primary means for conserving wetlands of international the Ramsar criteria for identifying Wetlands of International significance. Designation as a Ramsar site confers upon it the Importance. The nomination will need to be supported by the prestige of international recognition, it also raises the profile of following documentation: Ramsar Information Sheet; boundary the site; enhances opportunities for management assistance description and map(s); an ecological character description; and improves long-term management of the wetland; and a management plan or system; and a summary of consultative increases legislative protection through the Environment outcomes for the nomination. The documentation requirements Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Ramsar site cover the information required for nomination, baseline managers are responsible for, amongst other things, managing information on ecological character and management planning Ramsar sites to maintain the ecological character of the site. for the site. It should be noted that the nomination process can be lengthy and may require considerable resources to complete. Ramsar site nominations can be initiated by the Australian, state and territory governments, non government organisations A Ramsar site nomination is considered by the Australian (NGOs), community entities, trusts, Traditional Owners, Government on its merits, to ensure that: the site meets the individuals, private landowners or a company. Proposed Ramsar criteria for international importance; appropriate nominations on state or private land require support from the consultation with key stakeholders has taken place; suitable relevant state government. Nominations for sites wholly within management arrangements are in place for the site, including Commonwealth land require Australian Government support. appropriate watering arrangements (where required); ongoing In practice, most Ramsar site nominations are proposed and stakeholder engagement arrangements are in place for the developed by the state or territory governments, which have site; and whether the site will assist Australia to meet the priorities for new Ramsar sites and processes for reviewing requirements of the Ramsar Convention’s Strategic Plan. and supporting Ramsar nominations. Nominations may also The Australian Government processes for reviewing Ramsar site be made based on priorities agreed by the Australian, state nominations are independent of state or territory government and territory governments. processes and timeframes for developing and proposing site The guidelines are intended to facilitate more effective, efficient, nominations. The final
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendices, Glossary and Index
    7 Appendices Appendix A: Agency resourcing statement 2010–11 Appendix B: Portfolio Budget Statements reporting 2010–11 Appendix C: Ecologically sustainable development and environmental performance Appendix D: Freedom of information statement Appendix E: Compliance index Christmas Island red crabs. Photo: Parks Australia Appendix A: Agency Resourcing Statement 2010–11 The Agency Resourcing Statement was introduced to Portfolio Budget Statements in 2008–09 to provide information about the various funding sources that the Director of National Parks may draw upon during the year. The Director of National Parks is required to publish the Agency Resourcing Statement in the annual report that reconciles to cash reserves in the financial statements. Actual available Payments Balance appropriation Made Remaining $’000 $’000 $’000 Opening balance/Reserves at bank 38,353 – 38,353 REVENUE FROM GOVERNMENT Ordinary annual services¹ Outcome 1 – – – Total ordinary annual services – – – Other services² Non-operating 2,249 – 2,249 Total other services 2,249 – 2,249 Total annual appropriations 2,249 – 2,249 Payments from related entities3 Amounts from the portfolio department 46,444 46,444 (0) Total 46,444 46,444 (0) Total funds from Government 46,444 46,444 (0) FUNDS FROM OTHER SOURCES Interest 1,575 1,575 – Sale of goods and services 15,486 15,486 – Other 2,328 1,390 938 Total 19,389 18,451 938 Total net resourcing for DNP 106,435 64,895 41,540 All figures are GST exclusive As per the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Section 514S, DSEWPaC is directly appropriated the Director of National Parks (DNP) appropriations, which is then allocated to the DNP by the Secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Estuarine Wetlands
    ESTUARINE WETLANDS • An estuary occurs where a river meets the sea. • Wetlands connected with this environment are known as estuarine wetlands. • The water has a mix of the saltwater tides coming in from the ocean and the freshwater from the river. • They include tidal marshes, salt marshes, mangrove swamps, river deltas and mudflats. • They are very important for birds, fish, crabs, mammals, insects. • They provide important nursery grounds, breeding habitat and a productive food supply. • They provide nursery habitat for many species of fish that are critical to Australia’s commercial and recreational fishing industries. • They provide summer habitat for migratory wading birds as they travel between the northern and southern hemispheres. Estuarine wetlands in Australia Did you know? Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory: Jabiru build large, two-metre wide • Kakadu has four large river systems, the platform nests high in trees. The East, West and South Alligator rivers nests are made up of sticks, branches and the Wildman river. Most of Kakadu’s and lined with rushes, water-plants wetlands are a freshwater system, but there and mud. are many estuarine wetlands around the mouths of these rivers and other seasonal creeks. Moreton Bay, Queensland: • Kakadu is famous for the large numbers of birds present in its wetlands in the dry • Moreton Bay has significant mangrove season. habitat. • Many wetlands in Kakadu have a large • The estuary supports fish, birds and other population of saltwater crocodiles. wildlife for feeding and breeding. • Seagrasses in Moreton Bay provide food and habitat for dugong, turtles, fish and crustaceans. www.environment.gov.au/wetlands Plants and animals • Saltwater crocodiles live in estuarine and • Dugongs, which are also known as sea freshwater wetlands of northern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Eighty Mile Beach
    Fact Sheet: Eighty Mile Beach Region North Coast Summary Imagine an isolated beach of endless white sand, seashells and turquoise waters, stretching so far it would take more than a week to walk its length. Aptly named, Eighty Mile Beach is indeed long, stretching 220 kilometres and renowned as Australia's longest uninterrupted beach. With its midpoint halfway between Broome and Port Hedland, Eighty Mile Beach is like no other beach in Australia – where the desert (Great Sandy Desert) meets the sea (Indian Ocean). It differentiates itself from other beaches with its low windswept dunes, an almost continuous curving coastline, and large tidal ranges that expose some 60,000 hectares of sand and mudflats, widening the intertidal zone at low tide to almost four kilometres in some sections. Generated on 27/09/2021 https://marinewaters.fish.wa.gov.au/resource/fact-sheet-eighty-mile-beach/ Page 1 of 7 Figure 1. The wide expanse of the intertidal zone as the tide returns on Eighty mile beach (Image: Tahryn Thompson) The seascape is even more remarkable due to an extraordinary diversity of marine life, which includes up to 400,000 migratory shorebirds, rich benthic (mud) fauna, breeding turtles and the world’s largest stocks of wild pearl shell. The shorebirds and marine life of this wetland are recognised internationally under the Ramsar Convention. Eighty Mile Beach is sea country for the Karajarri people to the north, the Nyangumarta people over most of its length and the Ngarla people in the vicinity of Cape Keraudren. Mythological and ceremonial sites, Aboriginal art, shell middens and fish traps are found throughout the area and each group retains social, spiritual and cultural bonds with their traditional land and sea country.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation of Disaster Risk Reduction Ecosystem Services of Australia's
    Valuation of disaster risk reduction ecosystem services of Australia’s coastal wetlands: review and recommendations REPORT PREPARED BY IDEEA GROUP 14 July 2020 Prepared for Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE) Reference ID: 3600004198 Date 14 July 2020 Institute for the Development of Environmental-Economic Accounting (IDEEA Group) ABN 22 608 437 056 [email protected] www.ideeagroup.com Authors John Finisdore, Dr. Nathan Waltham, Carl Obst, Ben Chipperfield, Reiss Mcleod, and Mark Eigenraam Dr. Roel Plant of UTS provided valuable insights when reviewing this report. Suggested citation IDEEA Group (2020) Valuation of disaster risk reduction ecosystem services of Australia’s coastal wetlands: review and recommendations. Prepared for the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE). Canberra, Australia. Disclaimer This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services described in the contract or agreement between IDEEA Group and the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE). This document is supplied in good faith and reflects the knowledge, expertise and experience of the advisors involved. The document and findings are subject to assumptions and limitations referred to within the document. Any findings, conclusions or recommendations only apply to the contract or agreement and no greater reliance should be assumed or drawn by the DAWE. IDEEA Group accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining from action because of reliance on this document. Furthermore, the document has been prepared solely for use by DAWE. IDEEA Group accepts no responsibility for its use by other parties. Page 2 Contents 1 Executive summary ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic, Social and Icon Value of the Great Barrier Reef Acknowledgement
    At what price? The economic, social and icon value of the Great Barrier Reef Acknowledgement Deloitte Access Economics acknowledges and thanks the Great Barrier Reef Foundation for commissioning the report with support from the National Australia Bank and the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. In particular, we would like to thank the report’s Steering Committee for their guidance: Andrew Fyffe Prof. Ove Hoegh-Guldberg Finance Officer Director of the Global Change Institute Great Barrier Reef Foundation and Professor of Marine Science The University of Queensland Anna Marsden Managing Director Prof. Robert Costanza Great Barrier Reef Foundation Professor and Chair in Public Policy Australian National University James Bentley Manager Natural Value, Corporate Responsibility Dr Russell Reichelt National Australia Bank Limited Chairman and Chief Executive Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Keith Tuffley Director Stephen Fitzgerald Great Barrier Reef Foundation Director Great Barrier Reef Foundation Dr Margaret Gooch Manager, Social and Economic Sciences Stephen Roberts Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Director Great Barrier Reef Foundation Thank you to Associate Professor Henrietta Marrie from the Office of Indigenous Engagement at CQUniversity Cairns for her significant contribution and assistance in articulating the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander value of the Great Barrier Reef. Thank you to Ipsos Public Affairs Australia for their assistance in conducting the primary research for this study. We would also like
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Northern Australia
    THE NATURE OF NORTHERN AUSTRALIA Natural values, ecological processes and future prospects 1 (Inside cover) Lotus Flowers, Blue Lagoon, Lakefield National Park, Cape York Peninsula. Photo by Kerry Trapnell 2 Northern Quoll. Photo by Lochman Transparencies 3 Sammy Walker, elder of Tirralintji, Kimberley. Photo by Sarah Legge 2 3 4 Recreational fisherman with 4 barramundi, Gulf Country. Photo by Larissa Cordner 5 Tourists in Zebidee Springs, Kimberley. Photo by Barry Traill 5 6 Dr Tommy George, Laura, 6 7 Cape York Peninsula. Photo by Kerry Trapnell 7 Cattle mustering, Mornington Station, Kimberley. Photo by Alex Dudley ii THE NATURE OF NORTHERN AUSTRALIA Natural values, ecological processes and future prospects AUTHORS John Woinarski, Brendan Mackey, Henry Nix & Barry Traill PROJECT COORDINATED BY Larelle McMillan & Barry Traill iii Published by ANU E Press Design by Oblong + Sons Pty Ltd The Australian National University 07 3254 2586 Canberra ACT 0200, Australia www.oblong.net.au Email: [email protected] Web: http://epress.anu.edu.au Printed by Printpoint using an environmentally Online version available at: http://epress. friendly waterless printing process, anu.edu.au/nature_na_citation.html eliminating greenhouse gas emissions and saving precious water supplies. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry This book has been printed on ecoStar 300gsm and 9Lives 80 Silk 115gsm The nature of Northern Australia: paper using soy-based inks. it’s natural values, ecological processes and future prospects. EcoStar is an environmentally responsible 100% recycled paper made from 100% ISBN 9781921313301 (pbk.) post-consumer waste that is FSC (Forest ISBN 9781921313318 (online) Stewardship Council) CoC (Chain of Custody) certified and bleached chlorine free (PCF).
    [Show full text]
  • West Canning Basin Allocation Statement
    West Canning Basin Allocation statement The West Canning Basin in the To manage water use the Pilbara region of Western Australia Department of Water and is an important water resource Environmental Regulation set for regional development and allocation limits and licensing rules supports both irrigated agriculture for the West Canning Basin in the and mining. Located around 100 Pilbara groundwater allocation plan kilometres east of Port Hedland, (DoW, 2013) and then revised the limits the West Canning Basin covers in 2014 based on new hydrogeology approximately 3500 square and monitoring information. This kilometres and includes the allocation statement replaces section Broome and Wallal aquifers in the 5.3 of this plan and includes a change Canning-Kimberley groundwater to the Wallal unconfined and confined area, and the Wallal aquifer in the aquifers. Pilbara groundwater area. Locality Map Port Hedland Eighty Mile Beach roadhouse Pardoo n Highway Pardoo roadhouse Great Norther station Legend West Canning Basin Pilbara groundwater allocation plan area Groundwater areas Canningimele Pilbara Aquifers 0 10 20 30 40 Broome Kilometres Figure 1: Location and aquifers of the West Canning Basin Current water availability Water demand for irrigated agriculture and mining While there is currently no more water available for has increased significantly in the West Canning licensing from the Wallal aquifer, water is available Basin. Over the last two years, DWER has assessed from the 10 GL/year allocation for the Broome aquifer and licensed water entitlements from the Wallal in the West Canning–Pardoo subarea, though quality aquifer that now total almost 51 GL/year. and yield may vary from site to site (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT
    supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction
    [Show full text]
  • Kakadu National Park Management Plan 2007–2014 Akadu Is Aboriginal Kland
    Kakadu Board of Management Kakadu National Park MANAGEMENT PLAN 2007–2014 PLAN MANAGEMENT KAKADU NATIONAL PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN 2007–2014 Design Direction Design 3888 Photos Comb-crested Jacana: Michael Nelson Magpie Goose: Greg Miles Orchid: Michael Nelson Termite mound: Michael Nelson Darter: Michael Nelson Lotus flower: Michael Nelson Fire management: Michael Nelson Tourists at Ubirr art site: Michael Nelson Paperbark trees: Michael Nelson Tourists at Ubirr lookout: Peter Wellings West Alligator Head main beach: Greg Miles 4WD at Gunlom Falls: Michael Nelson Artwork Guided walk: Emily Scheibe Ranger at rock art site: Kristina Williams Fire management: Rhiannon Compton Ranger in boat: Justin Giumelli Pandanus and tree: William Suitor Chapter Pages Photos: Ian Oswald-Jacobs Artwork Lotus flowers and birdlife (page 1): Kodi Nadji Water lily leaves on wetland (page 15): Gail Rotumah Crocodile and landscape (page 17): Curtis Yarrbar Park use – featuring Frilled lizard (page 152): Christine Marie Alangate Designed by Design Direction Printed by CanPrint on Monza Satin (100 per cent recycled stock, from plantation timber) Kakadu National Park MANAGEMENT PLAN 2007–2014 © director of national Parks 2007 iSBn: 978 06 42 55 33 94 this work is copyright. apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process, re-used or redistributed without prior written permission from the director of national Parks. any permitted reproduction must acknowledge the source of any such material reproduced and include a copy of the original copyright notice. requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and copyright should be addressed to: the assistant Secretary Parks australia north gPo Box 1260 darwin nt 0801 director of national Parks australian business number: 13051 694 963 this management Plan provides the general public and Park users/visitors with information about how the Park will be managed for the next seven years.
    [Show full text]
  • SIS) – 2017 Version
    Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites (SIS) – 2017 version Available for download from http://www.eaaflyway.net/about/the-flyway/flyway-site-network/ Categories approved by Second Meeting of the Partners of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership in Beijing, China 13-14 November 2007 - Report (Minutes) Agenda Item 3.13 Notes for compilers: 1. The management body intending to nominate a site for inclusion in the East Asian - Australasian Flyway Site Network is requested to complete a Site Information Sheet. The Site Information Sheet will provide the basic information of the site and detail how the site meets the criteria for inclusion in the Flyway Site Network. When there is a new nomination or an SIS update, the following sections with an asterisk (*), from Questions 1-14 and Question 30, must be filled or updated at least so that it can justify the international importance of the habitat for migratory waterbirds. 2. The Site Information Sheet is based on the Ramsar Information Sheet. If the site proposed for the Flyway Site Network is an existing Ramsar site then the documentation process can be simplified. 3. Once completed, the Site Information Sheet (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Flyway Partnership Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the Information Sheet and, where possible, digital versions (e.g. shapefile) of all maps. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Leichhardt: a German Explorer’S Letters Home from Australia
    Ludwig Leichhardt: A German Explorer’s Letters Home from Australia Heike Hartmann Seventeen letters sent by Ludwig Leichhardt from 1842–48 vividly depict his stay in Australia. In this exhibition curated by historian Heike Hartmann, we are introducing a brand new English translation of the letters and a timeline tool with which to view those, this virtual exhibition documents Leichhardt’s adventurous stay in Australia and opens up new perspectives for the environmental history of the land, Europeans’ engagement with its indigenous population, and international scientific networks at the time. Click here to read the letters. Exhibition texts by Heike Hartmann (2015) under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 International license. This refers only to the text and does not include any image rights. For copyright information on the above images, please click here. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/exhibitions/leichhardt/copyright-information How to cite: Hartmann, Heike. “Ludwig Leichhardt: A German Explorer’s Letters Home from Australia.” Commentaries translated by Brenda Black. Environment & Society Portal, Virtual Exhibitions 2015, no. 1. Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society. doi.org/10.5282/rcc/6348 . ISSN 2198-7696 Environment & Society Portal, Virtual Exhibitions Source URL: http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/6348 PDF created on: 27 January 2021 12:38:07 About Ludwig Leichhardt’s life is inextricably bound with the European exploration of Australia. His first expedition (1844–1845) found a viable route between the east and north coasts of the colony and established Leichhardt’s reputation as the “Prince of Explorers.” In 1848 he set out on an expedition to cross the continent from east to west; the entire expedition party disappeared and was never found.
    [Show full text]
  • Ord River and Parry Lagoons Nature Reserves 2010 Draft Management Plan
    Ord River and Parry Lagoons Nature Reserves 2010 Draft Management Plan R N V E M E O N G T E O H F T W A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T ORD RIVER AND PARRY LAGOONS NATURE RESERVES Management Plan 2010 Department of Environment and Conservation Conservation Commission of Western Australia ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This management plan was prepared by Department planning officer Sarah Greenwood with assistance from Paul McCluskey and Laurina Bullen. Assistance was provided by Daryl Moncrieff, Troy Sinclair, Scott Goodson, Allan Thomson and David Grosse. The planning team would like to thank the many other Departmental staff that contributed to and commented on sections of this plan. Special thanks to Jennifer Hale, ecologist and author of the Ecological Character Description for the Ord River Floodplain Ramsar site. Front cover images: Main image: Boardwalk at Marlgu Billabong. Photo by DEC. Other images: Frog; Telegraph Hill interpretive sign. Photos by DEC. ii INVITATION TO COMMENT This draft management plan gives you the opportunity to provide information, express your opinion, suggest alternatives and have your say on how Ord River and Parry Lagoons nature reserves and proposed additions will be managed over the next 10 years. What to consider In making your submission, it is important to understand that legislation and policy impose certain obligations on the Department of Environment and Conservation to manage lands and waters vested with the Conservation Commission of Western Australia and that there may be little room to manage some issues outside of these constraints and responsibilities.
    [Show full text]