The Role of Population Structureand Size in Determining Bat Pathogen
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The role of population structure and size in determining bat patho- gen richness Tim C. D. Lucas A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of: Doctor of Philosophy of University College London 2016 Primary supervisor: Prof. Kate E. Jones Secondary supervisor: Dr Hilde M. Wilkinson-Herbots ii I, Tim C. D. Lucas, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. iii Abstract Pathogens acquired from animals make up the majority of emerging human diseases, are often highly virulent and can have large effects on public health and economic development. Identifying species with high pathogen species richness enables efficient sampling and mon- itoring of potentially dangerous pathogens. I examine the role of host population structure and size in maintaining pathogen species richness in an important reservoir host for zoonotic viruses, bats (Order, Chiroptera). Firstly I test whether population structure is associated with high viral richness across bat species with a comparative, phylogenetic analysis. I find evidence that bat species with more structured populations have more virus species. As this type of study cannot distinguish between specific mechanisms, I then formulate epi- demiological models to test whether more structured host populations may allow invading pathogens to avoid competition. However, these models show that increasing population structure decreases the rate of pathogen invasion. As both global host population structure and local group size appear to be important for disease invasion, I use the same modelling framework to compare the importance of host density, group size and number of groups. I find that host group size has a stronger effect than density or number of groups. There are few bat population size estimates to empirically test the importance of host population size on pathogen richness. Therefore, to assist future research, I develop a method for estimating bat population sizes from acoustic surveys. Overall in this thesis, I show that the structure and size of host bat populations can affect their ability to maintain many pathogen species and I provide a method to measure population sizes of bats. These findings increase our understanding of the ecological process of pathogen community construction and can help optimise surveillance for zoonotic pathogens. iv Acknowledgements Firstly and most importantly I would like to thank my wife, Katrina, for helping me beyond measure throughout my PhD. Secondly, although he has contributed very little towards my thesis, I would also like to thank my son, Dylan, for making my life tiring and brilliant for the last two years. I would also like to thank my parents for the endless support they have given me both during and before my studies. I would like to give special thanks to my supervisors, Kate Jones and Hilde Wilkinson-Herbots. Their guidance has been invaluable. Their patience, as my drafts progressed from terrible to less-terrible, has been admirable. Thank you for all your help. A number of other collaborators and researchers have contrib- uted to, or commented on, various chapters and analyses. My thanks goes to David Redding, Marcus Rowcliffe, Robin Freeman, Chris Carbone, Andrew Cun- ningham, James Wood and Francois Balloux. I have been fortunate enough to get to know a large number of fellow stu- dents during my time at UCL. I would like to thank my CoMPLEX cohort for making the masters year hilarious. In particular thank you Liz for being a great collaborator and for ensuring there was at least one other ecologist in CoMPLEX. I would also like to thank all those at CBER for making the office such a social place to work: Dave Curnick, for constantly reminding me how poor at squash I am; Henry Ferguson-Gow, for the many music recommendations and discussions; as well as Allie Fairbrass, Ellie Dyer, Laura Nunes, Roee Moar, Prabu Sivasub- ramaniam, Gee Ferreira, Stuart Nattrass and everyone else. It would have been very dull without you. v Contents Contents ........................................ v List of Figures .................................... ix List of Tables ..................................... xi Chapter 1 Introduction ............................. 1 1.1 Pathogen richness and the impacts of zoonotic diseases . 2 1.2 Influence of population size and structure on pathogen richness . 4 1.2.1 Single-pathogen models ..................... 4 1.2.2 Multi-pathogen models ..................... 5 1.3 Bats as reservoirs of zoonotic diseases ................. 6 1.4 Thesis overview .............................. 7 Chapter 2 A comparative test of the role of population structure in determining pathogen richness ................. 10 2.1 Abstract ................................... 11 2.2 Introduction ................................ 12 2.3 Methods ................................... 14 2.3.1 Data Collection .......................... 14 2.3.2 Statistical analysis ......................... 17 2.4 Results .................................... 19 2.4.1 Number of Subspecies ...................... 19 2.4.2 Gene Flow ............................. 21 2.4.3 Phylogenetic Analysis ...................... 23 2.5 Discussion ................................. 25 2.5.1 Broader implications ....................... 27 2.5.2 Study limitations ......................... 28 2.5.3 Conclusions ............................ 29 C vi Chapter 3 Understanding how population structure affects patho- gen richness in a mechanistic model of bat populations . 30 3.1 Abstract ................................... 31 3.2 Introduction ................................ 32 3.3 Methods ................................... 35 3.3.1 Two pathogen SIR model .................... 35 3.3.2 Parameter selection ........................ 39 3.3.3 Experimental setup ........................ 40 3.3.4 Population structure ....................... 41 3.3.5 Statistical analysis ......................... 42 3.4 Results .................................... 42 3.4.1 Dispersal .............................. 42 3.4.2 Network topology ........................ 43 3.4.3 Transmission ........................... 44 3.5 Discussion ................................. 44 3.5.1 Model assumptions ........................ 46 3.5.2 Conclusions ............................ 47 Chapter 4 A mechanistic model to compare the importance of inter- related population measures: host population size, dens- ity and colony size ......................... 48 4.1 Abstract ................................... 49 4.2 Introduction ................................ 50 4.3 Methods ................................... 53 4.3.1 Population factors ........................ 56 4.3.2 Statistical analysis ......................... 58 4.4 Results .................................... 58 4.4.1 Host density or population size . 59 4.4.2 Colony size or number of groups . 59 4.5 Discussion ................................. 59 4.5.1 Global change ........................... 61 4.5.2 Comparative studies ....................... 61 4.5.3 Assumptions and limitation ................... 62 4.5.4 Conclusions ............................ 63 Chapter 5 A generalised random encounter model for estimating animal density with remote sensor data ........... 64 C vii 5.1 Abstract ................................... 65 5.2 Introduction ................................ 65 5.3 Methods ................................... 68 5.3.1 Analytical Model ......................... 68 5.3.2 Simulation Model ......................... 73 5.4 Results .................................... 74 5.4.1 Analytical model ......................... 74 5.4.2 Simulation model ......................... 75 5.5 Discussion ................................. 77 5.5.1 Analytical model ......................... 77 5.5.2 Accuracy, Precision and Recommendations for Best Practice 79 5.5.3 Limitations ............................. 80 5.5.4 Implications for ecology and conservation . 81 Chapter 6 Discussion .............................. 83 6.1 Overview .................................. 84 6.2 Comparison to the literature ....................... 85 6.3 Other mechanisms controlling pathogen richness . 85 6.4 Predictive modelling ........................... 87 6.5 Bat social structure ............................. 88 6.6 Conclusions ................................. 90 Bibliography ..................................... 91 Appendices ...................................... 117 A Appendix: A comparative test of the role of population structure in determining pathogen richness ..................... 117 B Appendix: Understanding how population structure affects patho- gen richness in a mechanistic model of bat populations ....... 134 C Appendix: A mechanistic model to compare the importance of interrelated population measures: host population size, density and colony size ................................. 139 D Appendix: A generalised random encounter model for estimat- ing animal density with remote sensor data .............. 141 D.1 Table of symbols ..............................142 C viii D.2 Supplementary methods . 143 D.2.1 Introduction ............................143 D.2.2 Gas model .............................143 D.2.3 Model SE1 .............................145 D.2.4 Models NE1–3 . 145 D.2.5 Models SE2–4 . 148 D.2.6 Model NW1 ............................150 D.2.7 Models NW2–4 . 151 D.2.8 Model REM ............................154 D.2.9 Models NW5–7 . 155 D.2.10 Model SW1–3 . 157 D.2.11 Model