DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 Abstracts Revised 061013 Sm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MID-AMERICA ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION 31 st Annual Meeting April 17-21, 2013 Omni Amelia Island Resort Amelia Island, FL Podium and Poster Abstracts NOTE: Disclosure information is listed at the end of this document. MAOA FIRST PLENARY SESSION April 18, 2013 1. Long-Term Outcomes of Modified Eden-Lange Tendon Transfer for Symptomatic Trapezius Paralysis from Spinal Accessory Nerve Injury Eric R. Wagner, M.D. Rochester, MN *Basseem T. Elhassan, M.D. Rochester, MN PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of multiple tendon transfers to the scapula to stabilize the scapulothoracic articulation in the treatment of symptomatic trapezius paralysis. METHODS: Thirteen patients, with average age of 25 years, had a history of trapezius paralysis secondary to spinal accessory nerve injury that failed to recover spontaneously or after nerve repair. The indications for surgery included shoulder pain and weakness and limited range of motion of the shoulder, specifically shoulder abduction. All patients underwent triple tendon transfer, including transfer of the levator scapulae with its bony insertion to the lateral aspect of the spine of the scapula, rhomboid minor with its bony insertion to the spine of the scapula just medial to the levator scapulae insertion, and rhomboid major tendinous insertion to the medial spine of the scapula and superomedial aspect of the infraspinatus fossa. All patients had a CT scan and ultrasound done at brace removal and beyond one year. RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 25 months (15-35), all patients had improvement of neck asymmetry, restoration of the scapula position compared to the opposite site, and no evidence of winging. All patients had significant improvement of pain from 12 of 13 patients reporting pain as moderate or severe before the operation to 2 of 13 after the operation (p<0.01). Improvements in range of motion included active shoulder abduction from average 71 o preoperatively to 108 o postoperatively (p<0.02) and shoulder flexion from average 102 o to 140 o (p<0.01). The aggregate shoulder Constant Score from 41, with a relative score of 49% preoperatively to 63, with a relative score of 70% postoperatively (p<0.01). The shoulder subjective value was 44% preoperatively to 67% postoperatively (p<0.01). The DASH score improved from 55 to 21 after the operation (p<0.01). CT scans demonstrated bony healing; beginning as early as eight weeks postoperatively, while ultrasound demonstrated successful muscle contraction in the line of the transfer. All patients were very satisfied with the outcome of surgery and reported their shoulder as better or significantly better than preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple tendon transfers to the scapula to try to restore the function of the trapezius appear to be effective in stabilizing the scapulothoracic articulation and restoring the function of the trapezius, which in turns lead to significant improvement of pain and shoulder function. 2. Comparative Effectiveness of Prophylactic Antibiotic Choice and Surgical Infection in Arthroplasty Brent A. Ponce, M.D. Birmingham, AL *Benjamin Todd Raines, MA, ATC Birmingham, AL Catherine Vick, M.P.H., M.T. (ASCP ) Birmingham, AL Joshua Richman, M.D. Birmingham, AL Mary Hawn, M.D. Birmingham, AL INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic antibiotics (PA) decrease surgical site infections (SSI). Recent studies have failed to show improved SSI rates with adherence to the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) measures. The aim of this study is to identify the comparative effectiveness of the SCIP approved antibiotics for SSI prevention. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using national Veteran’s Administration (VA) data on patients undergoing elective primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty from 2005 to 2009. Data on the type of PA used was merged with VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to identify SSI as well as patient and procedure risk factors. Patients were stratified by documented penicillin (PEN) allergy, and SSI rates were compared among patients receiving vancomycin (VANC) alone versus other SCIP-approved PA using chi-square tests. The overall low event rate precluded reliable adjustment for covariates. RESULTS: A total of 16,568 arthroplasties were included in the cohort. PA use distribution: 81.2% received a 1 st generation cephalosporin (CF1), 8.3% VANC, 5.8% VANC + CF1, and 4.7% clindamycin (CLINDA). A documented PEN allergy accounted for 52.9% of patients receiving VANC, and 95.0% of those receiving CLINDA. The overall 30-day observed SSI rate was 1.5%. Unadjusted SSI rates by PA were: 2.6% with VANC alone, 1.5% with VANC + CF1, 1.4% with CF1, and 1.0% with CLINDA. Unadjusted analysis among patients with documented PEN allergy revealed an SSI frequency of 2.1% with VANC prophylaxis compared to 1.0% for CLINDA (Chi-square p=0.12). For patients without PEN allergy, SSI rate of 3.3% for VANC prophylaxis compared to 1.6% for VANC + CF1 (p=0.04) and 1.4% for CF1 alone (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Factors other than PEN allergy, such as concern for MRSA or practice style, significantly influence the choice of VANC administration. Higher SSI rates observed with VANC as the sole PA suggest that VANC may not be an optimal PA. These data suggest that CLINDA is more effective in patients with PEN allergy and when there is concern for MRSA, VANC should be used in conjunction with a CF1 . 3. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Acetabular Cup Insertion: Patient Specific vs. Standard Surgical Instrumentation♦ *Travis J. Small, D.O. Cleveland, OH Viktor E. Krebs, M.D. Cleveland, OH Robert M. Molloy, M.D. Cleveland, OH Travis H. Smith, D.O. Cleveland, OH Jason Bryan, M.S. Cleveland, OH Alison K. Klika, M.S. Cleveland, OH Amar Mutnal, M.D. Cleveland, OH Wael K. Barsoum, M.D. Cleveland, OH INTRODUCTION: Success of total hip arthroplasty (THA) relies largely upon placement of the acetabular cup. Current imaging and preoperative planning are imprecise and unreliable. Severe pathology and less experienced surgeons can give rise to malpositioned cups leading to dislocation, impingement, and increased wear. The purpose of this study was to determine if a three-dimensional software program for preoperative planning combined with Acetabular Positioning System (APS) instrumentation improves placement of acetabular cups compared to standard imaging and surgical instrumentation (STD) in THA. METHODS: Three fellowship-trained surgeons performed THAs (various approaches) on 36 patients randomized into STD (n=18) or APS (n=18) technique. Preoperative CT scans were obtained on all patients and converted to the 3-D software program. All cases were preoperatively planned; APSs were manufactured for APS surgeries only. For STD cases, the patient’s surgery was completed using traditional techniques and instrumentation. All patients received postoperative CT scans to compare the planned to actual results. APS and STD cases were compared using absolute values and deviation from plan in planes of abduction and anteversion. RESULTS: Mean anteversion for the 18 APS cases was 18.54° ± 7.85°, and mean abduction was 46.4° ± 7.07°. Mean anteversion for the 18 STD cases was 28.44° ± 7.86° and mean abduction was 43.98° ± 9.03°. The differences found between the planned versus actual anteversion were -0.22° ± 6.95° (APS) and -6.89° ± 8.92° (STD). The differences between planned and actual abduction were -1.96° ± 7.28° (APS) and 1.27° ± 9.07° (STD). Difference in the means of anteversion in PSI versus STD was significant (p=0.0176); while differences in means abduction differences were not significant (p=0.246). CONCLUSIONS: The use of APS instruments resulted in significantly greater anteversion accuracy and precision than STD instruments. Abduction accuracy and precision was similar in each group. 4. Factors Associated with Nonunion in 100 Consecutive Type 2 and Type 3 Odontoid Fractures in Elderly Patients Michael T. Merrick, M.D. Grand Rapids MI *Casey L. Smith, M.D. Grand Rapids, MI Debra L. Sietsema, Ph.D., R.N. Grand Rapids, MI Tan Chen, M.S. Grand Rapids, MI Tammy Beckett, R.N. Grand Rapids, MI Clifford B. Jones, M.D. Grand Rapids, MI James R. Stubbart, M.D. Grand Rapids, MI Scott S. Russo, M.D. Grand Rapids, MI SUMMARY: Factors predictive of nonunion in older patients with odontoid fractures include: type 2 odontoid fractures, posteriorly displaced fractures, nonoperative treatment, males, and low-energy mechanisms. INTRODUCTION: Odontoid fractures are the most common cervical spine injury in older adults and have high rates of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine factors that were predictive of nonunion in odontoid fractures. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2011, 100 consecutive patients, age 50 years and over, with type 2 and type 3 odontoid fractures were treated at a single Level I trauma center, were followed in a single private practice, and retrospectively evaluated. Radiographs were reviewed and fusion was determined by flexion/extension x-rays, CT scan, or both. Nineteen mortalities were excluded from the fusion analysis. RESULTS: The overall fusion rate in the 81 patients who were living at their last follow-up was 74.1%. Type 2 odontoid fractures had a fusion rate of 66.1% compared to 92.0% of type 3 odontoid fractures (x 2=0.014). Lower rates of fusion were seen in patients with posteriorly displaced fractures (30/47, 63.8%) than with nondisplaced and anteriorly displaced fractures, (30/34, 88.2%), (x 2=0.047). Patients treated with nonoperative management had a lower rate of fusion (39/59, 66.1%) compared to patients who were treated with surgery (21/22, 95.5%), (x 2=0.007). Males had a lower fusion rate (19 of 32, 59.4%) than females (41 of 49, 83.7%), (x 2=0.015).
Recommended publications
  • Clinical Practice Guideline for Limb Salvage Or Early Amputation

    Clinical Practice Guideline for Limb Salvage Or Early Amputation

    Limb Salvage or Early Amputation Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline Adopted by: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board of Directors December 6, 2019 Endorsed by: Please cite this guideline as: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Limb Salvage or Early Amputation Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/dod/ lsa-cpg-final-draft-12-10-19.pdf Published December 6, 2019 View background material via the LSA CPG eAppendix Disclaimer This clinical practice guideline was developed by a physician volunteer clinical practice guideline development group based on a formal systematic review of the available scientific and clinical information and accepted approaches to treatment and/or diagnosis. This clinical practice guideline is not intended to be a fixed protocol, as some patients may require more or less treatment or different means of diagnosis. Clinical patients may not necessarily be the same as those found in a clinical trial. Patient care and treatment should always be based on a clinician’s independent medical judgment, given the individual patient’s specific clinical circumstances. Disclosure Requirement In accordance with AAOS policy, all individuals whose names appear as authors or contributors to this clinical practice guideline filed a disclosure statement as part of the submission process. All panel members provided full disclosure of potential conflicts of interest prior to voting on the recommendations contained within this clinical practice guideline. Funding Source This clinical practice guideline was funded exclusively through a research grant provided by the United States Department of Defense with no funding from outside commercial sources to support the development of this document.
  • Understanding Icd-10-Cm and Icd-10-Pcs 3Rd Edition Download Free

    Understanding Icd-10-Cm and Icd-10-Pcs 3Rd Edition Download Free

    UNDERSTANDING ICD-10-CM AND ICD-10-PCS 3RD EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Mary Jo Bowie | 9781305446410 | | | | | International Classification of Diseases, (ICD-10-CM/PCS) Transition - Background Palmer B. Manual placenta removal. A: Understanding ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS 3rd edition International Classification of Diseases ICD is a common framework and language to report, compile, use and compare health information. Psychoanalysis Adlerian therapy Analytical therapy Mentalization-based treatment Transference focused psychotherapy. Hysteroscopy Vacuum aspiration. Every code begins with an alpha character, which is indicative of the chapter to which the code is classified. Search Compliance Understanding BC, resilience standards and how to comply Follow these nine steps to first identify relevant business continuity and resilience standards and, second, launch a successful While many coders use ICD lookup software to help them, referring to an ICD code book is invaluable to build an understanding of the classification system. Pregnancy test Leopold's maneuvers Prenatal testing. Endoscopy : Colonoscopy Anoscopy Capsule endoscopy Enteroscopy Proctoscopy Sigmoidoscopy Abdominal ultrasonography Defecography Double-contrast barium enema Endoanal ultrasound Enteroclysis Lower gastrointestinal series Small-bowel follow-through Transrectal ultrasonography Virtual colonoscopy. Psychosurgery Lobotomy Bilateral cingulotomy Multiple subpial transection Hemispherectomy Corpus callosotomy Anterior temporal lobectomy. While codes in sections are structured similarly to the Medical and Surgical section, there are a few exceptions. Send Feedback Do you have Understanding ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS 3rd edition on the new website? Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. D Radiation oncology. Stem cell transplantation Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The primary distinctions are:. Palmer Joseph C.
  • Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery

    Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery

    Open Journal of Orthopedics, 2016, 6, 321-325 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojo ISSN Online: 2164-3016 ISSN Print: 2164-3008 Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery Anna De Leo, Billy Ching Leung*, Henk Giele Department of Plastic Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospital NHS Trust, Oxford, UK How to cite this paper: De Leo, A., Leung, Abstract B.C. and Giele, H. (2016) Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery. Open The use of tendon transfer to restore functions of extremities was initially recognised Journal of Orthopedics, 6, 321-325. in the 19th century, and its advancement was further amplified by the polio epidemic http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojo.2016.610042 towards the turn of that century. Tendon transfer surgery extended to the use for Received: August 18, 2016 traumatic reconstructive surgery during World War I, with key surgical pioneers, in- Accepted: October 16, 2016 cluding Mayer, Sterling Bunnell, Guy Pulvertaft and Joseph Boyes. In 1921, Robert Published: October 19, 2016 Jones first described the transfer of pronator teres (PT) to the wrist extensors for ir- reparable radial nerve paralysis in infantile hemiplegia. Although, a detailed descrip- Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. tion of its indication and surgical outcomes were not published until 1959 and 1970 This work is licensed under the Creative by Stelling and Meyer, and Keats, respectively. Pronator teres is often the tendon of Commons Attribution International choice for reconstructing wrist extensors, and used in a multiple of pathologies, in- License (CC BY 4.0). cluding radial nerve palsy, cerebral palsy, and tetraplegia.
  • ICD~10~PCS Complete Code Set Procedural Coding System Sample

    ICD~10~PCS Complete Code Set Procedural Coding System Sample

    ICD~10~PCS Complete Code Set Procedural Coding System Sample Table.of.Contents Preface....................................................................................00 Mouth and Throat ............................................................................. 00 Introducton...........................................................................00 Gastrointestinal System .................................................................. 00 Hepatobiliary System and Pancreas ........................................... 00 What is ICD-10-PCS? ........................................................................ 00 Endocrine System ............................................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Code Structure ........................................................... 00 Skin and Breast .................................................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Design ........................................................................... 00 Subcutaneous Tissue and Fascia ................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Additional Characteristics ...................................... 00 Muscles ................................................................................................. 00 ICD-10-PCS Applications ................................................................ 00 Tendons ................................................................................................ 00 Understandng.Root.Operatons..........................................00
  • En Bloc Resection of Extra-Peritoneal Soft Tissue Neoplasms Incorporating a Type III Internal Hemipelvectomy: a Novel Approach Sanjay S Reddy1* and Norman D Bloom2

    En Bloc Resection of Extra-Peritoneal Soft Tissue Neoplasms Incorporating a Type III Internal Hemipelvectomy: a Novel Approach Sanjay S Reddy1* and Norman D Bloom2

    Reddy and Bloom World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2012, 10:222 http://www.wjso.com/content/10/1/222 WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY REVIEW Open Access En bloc resection of extra-peritoneal soft tissue neoplasms incorporating a type III internal hemipelvectomy: a novel approach Sanjay S Reddy1* and Norman D Bloom2 Abstract Background: A type III hemipelvectomy has been utilized for the resection of tumors arising from the superior or inferior pubic rami. Methods: In eight patients, we incorporated a type III internal hemipelvectomy to achieve an en bloc R0 resection for tumors extending through the obturator foramen or into the ischiorectal fossa. The pelvic ring was reconstructed utilizing marlex mesh. This allowed for pelvic stability and abdominal wall reconstruction with obliteration of the obturator space to prevent herniations. Results: All eight patients had an R0 resection with an overall survival of 88% and with average follow up of 9.5 years. Functional evaluation utilizing the Enneking classification system, which evaluates motion, pain, stability and strength of the affected extremity, revealed a 62% excellent result and a 37% good result. No significant complications were associated with the operative procedure. Marlex mesh reconstruction provided pelvic stability and eliminated all hernial defects. Conclusion: The superior and inferior pubic rami provide a barrier to a resection for tumors that arise in the extra-peritoneal pelvis extending through the obturator foramen or ischiorectal fossa. Incorporating a type III internal
  • Use of Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Reconstruction of Traumatic Bilateral Hemipelvectomy After Major Pelvic Trauma

    Use of Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Reconstruction of Traumatic Bilateral Hemipelvectomy After Major Pelvic Trauma

    Al‑wageeh et al. surg case rep (2020) 6:247 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792‑020‑01009‑2 CASE REPORT Open Access Use of anterolateral thigh fap for reconstruction of traumatic bilateral hemipelvectomy after major pelvic trauma: a case report Saleh Al‑wageeh1 , Faisal Ahmed2* , Khalil Al‑naggar3 , Mohammad Reza Askarpour4 and Ebrahim Al‑shami5 Abstract Background: Major pelvic trauma (MPT) with traumatic hemipelvectomy (THP) is rare, but it is a catastrophic health problem caused by high‑energy injury leading to separation of the lower extremity from the axial skeleton, which is associated with a high incidence of intra‑abdominal and multi‑systemic injuries. THP is generally performed as a lifesaving protocol to return the patient to an active life. Case report: A 12‑year male patient exposed to major pelvic trauma with bilateral THP survived the trauma and mul‑ tiple lifesaving operations. The anterolateral thigh fap is the method used for wound reconstruction. The follow‑up was ended with colostomy and cystostomy with wheelchair mobilization. To the best of our knowledge, there have been a few bilateral THP reports, and our case is the second one to be successfully treated with an anterolateral thigh fap. Conclusion: MPT with THP is the primary cause of death among trauma patients. Life‑threatening hemorrhage is the usual cause of death, which is a strong indication for THP to save life. Keywords: Amputation, Hemipelvectomy, Myocutaneous fap, Reconstruction, Trauma Introduction A few victims survive these injuries, and the actual Major pelvic trauma (MPT) associated with traumatic incidence is unknown, but it is usually underestimated hemipelvectomy (THP) was described frst by Turnbull in [3].
  • Unit Price Base Price Service Type Procedure

    Unit Price Base Price Service Type Procedure

    University Physicians Group: Prices of Provider Services CPT Unit Base Service Procedure Modifier Code ype Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Price Price T 00100 PR ANESTH,SALIVARY GLAND W/BX 1.00 5.00 Anesthesia 00102 PR ANESTH,CLEFT LIP REPAIR 1.00 6.00 Anesthesia 00103 PR ANESTH,BLEPHAROPLASTY 1.00 5.00 Anesthesia 00104 ANESTH,ELECTROSHOCK/ ECT 1.00 4.00 Anesthesia 00120 ANESTH,EAR SURGERY 1.00 5.00 Anesthesia 00124 ANESTH,EAR EXAM 1.00 4.00 Anesthesia 00126 PR ANESTH,TYMPANOTOMY 1.00 4.00 Anesthesia 00140 PR ANESTH,PROCEDURES ON EYE 1.00 5.00 Anesthesia 00142 ANESTH, LENS SURGERY 1.00 4.00 Anesthesia 00144 PR ANESTH,CORNEAL TRANSPLANT 1.00 6.00 Anesthesia 00145 ANESTH, VITREORETINAL SURG 1.00 6.00 Anesthesia 00147 PR ANESTH,IRIDECTOMY 1.00 4.00 Anesthesia 00148 ANESTH,EYE EXAM 1.00 4.00 Anesthesia 00160 PR ANESTH,NOSE,SINUS SURGERY 1.00 5.00 Anesthesia 00162 PR ANESTH,NOSE,RADICAL SINUS 1.00 7.00 Anesthesia SURGERY 00164 PR ANESTH,BIOPSY OF NOSE 1.00 4.00 Anesthesia 00170 PR ANESTH,PROCEDURE ON MOUTH 1.00 5.00 Anesthesia 00172 PR ANESTH,CLEFT PALATE REPAIR 1.00 6.00 Anesthesia 00174 PR ANESTH,EXCIS RETROPHARYNG 1.00 6.00 Anesthesia 00176 PR ANESTH,PHARYNX SURG 1.00 7.00 Anesthesia 00190 PR ANESTH,FACIAL BONE SURGERY 1.00 5.00 Anesthesia 00192 PR ANESTH,RADICAL FACIAL BONE 1.00 7.00 Anesthesia SURGERY 00210 PR ANESTH,OPEN HEAD SURGERY 1.00 11.00 Anesthesia 00211 PR ANESTH, INTRACRANIAL 1.00 10.00 Anesthesia HEMATOMA EVACUATION 00212 PR ANESTH,SKULL SURG SUBDUR 1.00 5.00 Anesthesia 00214 PR ANESTH,SKULL SURG BURR 1.00 9.00 Anesthesia
  • Code Procedure Cpt Price University Physicians Group

    Code Procedure Cpt Price University Physicians Group

    UNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS GROUP (UPG) PRICES OF PROVIDER SERVICES CODE PROCEDURE MOD CPT PRICE 0001A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 30MCG/0.3ML DIL RECON 1ST DOSE 0001A $40.00 0002A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 30MCG/0.3ML DIL RECON 2ND DOSE 0002A $40.00 0011A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 100 MCG/0.5 ML 1ST DOSE 0011A $40.00 0012A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 100 MCG/0.5 ML 2ND DOSE 0012A $40.00 0021A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 5X1010 VP/0.5 ML 1ST DOSE 0021A $40.00 0022A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 5X1010 VP/0.5 ML 2ND DOSE 0022A $40.00 0031A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 AD26 5X10^10 VP/0.5 ML 1 DOSE 0031A $40.00 0042T CEREBRAL PERFUS ANALYSIS, CT W/CONTRAST 0042T $954.00 0054T BONE SURGERY USING COMPUTER ASSIST, FLURO GUIDED 0054T $640.00 0055T BONE SURGERY USING COMPUTER ASSIST, CT/ MRI GUIDED 0055T $1,188.00 0071T U/S LEIOMYOMATA ABLATE <200 CC 0071T $2,500.00 0075T 0075T PR TCAT PLMT XTRC VRT CRTD STENT RS&I PRQ 1ST VSL 26 26 $2,208.00 0126T CAROTID INT-MEDIA THICKNESS EVAL FOR ATHERSCLER 0126T $55.00 0159T 0159T COMPUTER AIDED BREAST MRI 26 26 $314.00 PR RECTAL TUMOR EXCISION, TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC 0184T MICROSURGICAL, FULL THICK 0184T $2,315.00 0191T PR ANT SEGMENT INSERTION DRAINAGE W/O RESERVOIR INT 0191T $2,396.00 01967 ANESTH, NEURAXIAL LABOR, PLAN VAG DEL 01967 $2,500.00 01996 PR DAILY MGMT,EPIDUR/SUBARACH CONT DRUG ADM 01996 $285.00 PR PERQ SAC AGMNTJ UNI W/WO BALO/MCHNL DEV 1/> 0200T NDL 0200T $5,106.00 PR PERQ SAC AGMNTJ BI W/WO BALO/MCHNL DEV 2/> 0201T NDLS 0201T $9,446.00 PR INJECT PLATELET RICH PLASMA W/IMG 0232T HARVEST/PREPARATOIN 0232T $1,509.00 0234T PR TRANSLUMINAL PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY, RENAL
  • ACFAS 2020 Poster Presentation

    ACFAS 2020 Poster Presentation

    Peroneal Tenodesis and Plantar Fasciotomy for Diabetic Forefoot Ulceration,Case Series Michael D. Liette DPM, Michael J. McGowan DPM, Jordan A. Henning DPM, Bryan J. Hall FACFAS, DPM University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati Ohio Statement ofPurpose Procedure Performing a plantar fasciotomy, rather than a posterior Plantar ulceration is common amongst the neuropathic, An incision is made posterior and superior to the lateral heel cord lengthening, may be preferable to reduce the diabetic population. This is due to persistent hyperglycemia, the malleolus, approximately 4 cm in length, isolating and potential creation of a calcaneal gait in a cavus foot. Care production of advanced glycosylation end products, pursuant exposing the peroneal tendons. The peroneus longus tendon must be taken in performing posterior lengthenings in the tendon stiffness with musculature imbalance, and the ultimate is then identified by plantarflexing the first metatarsal and a cavus foot as pseudoequinus may lead to the incorrect effect of increased plantar pressures. Even with the most wedge of the tendon is removed. The proximal portion is diagnosis of equinus and increase the likelihood of the aggressive offloading and local wound care, recurrence rates then sutured to the peroneus brevis tendon under creation of a calcaneal gait and pursuant heel ulceration. remain elevated up to 60%. Deformity is often driven by physiological tension utilizing poly ethylene terephthalate The evidence supporting peroneus longus to peroneus musculature imbalance, eventually producing a compensatory suture. A small incision is then made within the instep of the brevis tenodesis is limited, with no known studies flexible cavus foot with pursuant contracted plantar fascia and medial longitudinal arch, isolating and transecting the evaluating this procedure in isolation to cure or prevent eventual ulceration.
  • Cross-Sectional Imaging in the Evaluation of Osteogenic Sarcoma: MRI and CT

    Cross-Sectional Imaging in the Evaluation of Osteogenic Sarcoma: MRI and CT

    Cross-sectional Imaging in the Evaluation of Osteogenic Sarcoma: MRI and CT By Leanne L. Seeger, Jeffrey J. Eckardt, and Lawrence W. Bassett EFORE the advent of cross-sectional scan- for treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging and B ning techniques, imaging of malignant bone CT image acquisition should address specific tumors was confined to plain radiography and issues that are important to the surgeon and radionuclide bone scanning. While radiography should be tailored according to tumor location remains the primary imaging modality for differ- and proposed surgical treatment, whether it be ential diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging amputation or resection with limb salvage proce- (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) have dure. had a profound impact on the preoperative stag- The following discussion reflects the scanning ing evaluation of bone tumors and their response principles and techniques we use for evaluating to therapy. patients with OGS both preoperatively and post- In this article we will define the role of MRI operatively. This was derived from both our own and CT in the work-up of the patient with known experience and the experience of others as re- osteogenic sarcoma (OGS), stressing imaging ported in the literature. ‘-’ Regional differences in strategies that optimize information available to the management of patients with malignant bone the clinician and assist in therapy planning. In tumors may alter this procedure. To become order to achieve these optimal factors, communi- familiar with local treatment protocols, commu- cation with the referring physician and review of nicate directly with the surgeon who will ulti- available radiographs and radionuclide bone scans mately be responsible for treatment.
  • ICD-9-CM Procedures (FY10)

    ICD-9-CM Procedures (FY10)

    2 PREFACE This sixth edition of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) is being published by the United States Government in recognition of its responsibility to promulgate this classification throughout the United States for morbidity coding. The International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, published by the World Health Organization (WHO) is the foundation of the ICD-9-CM and continues to be the classification employed in cause-of-death coding in the United States. The ICD-9-CM is completely comparable with the ICD-9. The WHO Collaborating Center for Classification of Diseases in North America serves as liaison between the international obligations for comparable classifications and the national health data needs of the United States. The ICD-9-CM is recommended for use in all clinical settings but is required for reporting diagnoses and diseases to all U.S. Public Health Service and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (formerly the Health Care Financing Administration) programs. Guidance in the use of this classification can be found in the section "Guidance in the Use of ICD-9-CM." ICD-9-CM extensions, interpretations, modifications, addenda, or errata other than those approved by the U.S. Public Health Service and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services are not to be considered official and should not be utilized. Continuous maintenance of the ICD-9- CM is the responsibility of the Federal Government. However, because the ICD-9-CM represents the best in contemporary thinking of clinicians, nosologists, epidemiologists, and statisticians from both public and private sectors, no future modifications will be considered without extensive advice from the appropriate representatives of all major users.
  • Icd-9-Cm (2010)

    Icd-9-Cm (2010)

    ICD-9-CM (2010) PROCEDURE CODE LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION 0001 Therapeutic ultrasound of vessels of head and neck Ther ult head & neck ves 0002 Therapeutic ultrasound of heart Ther ultrasound of heart 0003 Therapeutic ultrasound of peripheral vascular vessels Ther ult peripheral ves 0009 Other therapeutic ultrasound Other therapeutic ultsnd 0010 Implantation of chemotherapeutic agent Implant chemothera agent 0011 Infusion of drotrecogin alfa (activated) Infus drotrecogin alfa 0012 Administration of inhaled nitric oxide Adm inhal nitric oxide 0013 Injection or infusion of nesiritide Inject/infus nesiritide 0014 Injection or infusion of oxazolidinone class of antibiotics Injection oxazolidinone 0015 High-dose infusion interleukin-2 [IL-2] High-dose infusion IL-2 0016 Pressurized treatment of venous bypass graft [conduit] with pharmaceutical substance Pressurized treat graft 0017 Infusion of vasopressor agent Infusion of vasopressor 0018 Infusion of immunosuppressive antibody therapy Infus immunosup antibody 0019 Disruption of blood brain barrier via infusion [BBBD] BBBD via infusion 0021 Intravascular imaging of extracranial cerebral vessels IVUS extracran cereb ves 0022 Intravascular imaging of intrathoracic vessels IVUS intrathoracic ves 0023 Intravascular imaging of peripheral vessels IVUS peripheral vessels 0024 Intravascular imaging of coronary vessels IVUS coronary vessels 0025 Intravascular imaging of renal vessels IVUS renal vessels 0028 Intravascular imaging, other specified vessel(s) Intravascul imaging NEC 0029 Intravascular