Methods for Collecting Macroinvertebrate Samples For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Methods for Collecting Macroinvertebrate Samples For Page Intentionally Left Blank Methods for Collecting Macroinvertebrate Samples As Required For TMDL Alternative Studies and/or Watershed-based Plans Effective Date: September 30, 2015 Page 2 of 122 Document Revision History Date of Revision Page(s) Revised Revision Explanation September 2015 All Methods for Collecting Macroinvertebrate Samples As Required For TMDL Alternative Studies and/or Watershed- based Plans; original document; extracted in part from “Methods for Conducting Resource Extraction Individual Permit Intensive Surveys in Non-OSRW Streams of the Eastern Kentucky Coalfields, June 2014, Revision 2” Suggested Citation: Kentucky Division of Water (KDOW). 2015. Methods for Collecting Macroinvertebrate Samples As Required For TMDL Alternative Studies and/or Watershed-based Plans. Department for Environmental Protection. Division of Water, Frankfort, Kentucky. Methods for Collecting Macroinvertebrate Samples As Required For TMDL Alternative Studies and/or Watershed-based Plans Effective Date: September 30, 2015 Page 3 of 122 Table of Contents 1. Scope and Applicability .................................................................................................. 6 2. Definitions....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Personnel Qualifications ................................................................................................. 7 4. Equipment and Supplies ................................................................................................. 7 4.A. Equipment for Macroinvertebrate Collection ............................................................. 7 4.B. Equipment for Macroinvertebrate Sample Analysis ................................................... 8 5. Study Plan ....................................................................................................................... 8 6. Water Chemistry and In-Situ Physicochemical Collection and Processing Methods .... 8 7. Habitat Assessment Methods .......................................................................................... 8 7.A. Habitat Assessment Periods ........................................................................................ 9 7.B. High- vs. Low-Gradient Streams ................................................................................ 9 7.C. High-Gradient Habitat Assessment Procedures .......................................................... 9 7.C.1. Parameters for High-Gradient Habitat Assessment ............................................... 11 7.C.2. High-Gradient Habitat Narrative Scoring Ratings ................................................. 13 7.D. Low-Gradient Habitat Assessment Procedures......................................................... 15 7.D.1. Parameters for Low-Gradient Habitat Assessment ................................................ 16 7.D.2. Low-Gradient Habitat Narrative Scoring Ratings ................................................. 19 7.E. Photodocumentation .................................................................................................. 20 8. Macroinvertebrate Field Collection Methods ............................................................... 20 8.A. High-Gradient Streams ............................................................................................. 20 8.A.1. High-Gradient Stream Type ................................................................................... 20 8.A.2. High-Gradient Sampling Periods ........................................................................... 20 8.A.3. High-Gradient Sampling Reach ............................................................................. 21 8.A.4. High-Gradient Sampling Methods ......................................................................... 21 8.A.4.A. Wadeable High-Gradient Procedures ................................................................. 21 8.A.4.B. Headwater High-Gradient Procedures................................................................ 25 8.B. Low-Gradient Streams .............................................................................................. 27 8.B.1. Low-Gradient Stream Type .................................................................................... 27 8.B.2. Low-Gradient Sampling Periods ............................................................................ 27 8.B.3. Low-Gradient Sampling Reach .............................................................................. 28 8.B.4. Low-Gradient Sampling Method (20 Jab) ............................................................. 28 8.C. Sample Labeling ........................................................................................................ 30 8.D. Quality Assurance and Quality Control for Sampling Procedures ........................... 31 9. Macroinvertebrate Laboratory Methods ....................................................................... 31 9.A. Logging Samples....................................................................................................... 31 9.B. Sample Preservation .................................................................................................. 32 9.C. Sample Processing..................................................................................................... 32 9.C.1. Full Pick Method .................................................................................................... 32 9.C.2. 300 + 20% Pick Sub-Sampling Method ................................................................. 33 9.C.3. High-Gradient Multi-Habitat Sample Scan ............................................................ 33 9.D. Taxonomy ................................................................................................................. 34 9.E. Data and Records Management ................................................................................. 34 9.F. Quality Assurance and Quality Control for Laboratory Procedures ......................... 34 Methods for Collecting Macroinvertebrate Samples As Required For TMDL Alternative Studies and/or Watershed-based Plans Effective Date: September 30, 2015 Page 4 of 122 10. Macroinvertebrate Data Analysis-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment Index (MBI) ... 35 11. Data Reporting ............................................................................................................ 38 12. References ................................................................................................................... 39 12.A. General References ................................................................................................. 39 12.B. Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic References ............................................................. 41 List of Figures Figure 1. Bioregions of Kentucky ..................................................................................... 14 Figure 2. Narrative habitat scoring ratings for the Bluegrass, Pennyroyal and Mountain Bioregions ......................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 3. Bioregions of Kentucky ..................................................................................... 19 Figure 4. Narrative habitat scoring ratings for the Mississippi Valley Interior River Bioregion ........................................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 5. Summary of sampling methods for wadeable high-gradient streams ............... 24 Figure 6. Summary of sampling methods for headwater high-gradient streams .............. 27 Figure 7. Summary of the proportional 20 jab method for low-gradient streams ............ 28 List of Appendices A. Qualifications for an Environmental Biologist Consultant ........... 52 B. High-Gradient Habitat Assessment Sheet .................................................................... 55 C. Low-Gradient Habitat Assessment Sheet ..................................................................... 59 D. High- and Low-Gradient Multi-habitat Checklists ...................................................... 63 E. Master Macroinvertebrate Species List ........................................................................ 69 F. Macroinvertebrate Bench Sheet .................................................................................. 121 G. Examples of Data Summary Species Lists ................................................................ 126 Methods for Collecting Macroinvertebrate Samples As Required For TMDL Alternative Studies and/or Watershed-based Plans Effective Date: September 30, 2015 Page 5 of 122 1. Scope and Applicability This manual has been developed by the Kentucky Division of Water (KDOW) as guidance for any biologist or environmental professional involved in the uniform and accurate collection, field processing, field handling, and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) of habitat and macroinvertebrate data for TMDL alternative studies and watershed-based plans. The methods defined herein must be followed in order for the data to be used in water quality assessments by KDOW. Any data submitted to KDOW for review will undergo QA/QC and those identified as not following the methods set forth in this document will be flagged and reviewed for data usability. 2. Definitions Aufwuchs – The plants and animals adhering to parts of rooted aquatic plants and other open surfaces.
Recommended publications
  • Spezialpraktikum Aquatische Und Semiaquatische Heteroptera SS 2005
    Spezialpraktikum Aquatische und Semiaquatische Heteroptera SS 2005 Hinweise zum Bestimmungsschlüssel Das Skriptum ist für den Privatgebrauch bestimmt. Alle Angaben wurden nach bestem Wissen überprüft, Fehler sind aber nicht auszuschließen. Für Anmerkungen und Korrekturen bin ich sehr dankbar. Alle Abbildungen wurden der Literatur entnommen (siehe Literaturverzeichnis) und sind nicht Maßstabsgetreu, d.h. die Größenverhältnisse sind nicht korrekt wiedergegeben. Die Gesamtverbreitungsangaben wurden aus Aukema & Rieger (1995) entnommen und sind daher nicht aktuell. Sie geben aber einen guten Eindruck von der ungefähren Verbreitung der Arten. Die verwendeten zoogeographischen Angaben sind vorläufig und rein deskriptiv zu verstehen. Die Angabe der Bundesländervorkommen in Österreich erfolgt ohne Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit (Rabitsch unveröff., Stand 2005) Wolfgang Rabitsch Wien, Juni 2005 Version 1.1 (Juli 2005) Bestimmungsschlüssel der GERROMORPHA Österreichs Bestimmungsschlüssel der GERROMORPHA Österreichs (verändert nach Andersen 1993, 1995, 1996, Savage 1989, u.a.) Familien (Abb. 1) 1 Kopf mindestens doppelt so lang wie breit, Augen deutlich vom Vorderrand des Prothorax entfernt Hydrometridae - Kopf weniger als doppelt so lang wie breit, Augen berühren fast den Vorderrand des Prothorax 2 2 Coxae inserieren in der Körpermitte, Antennen 4-gliedrig, meist apter Mesoveliidae - Coxae inserieren lateral am Thorax 3 3 Antennen scheinbar 5-gliedrig, Segment 3-5 dünner als Segment 1-2, Ocellen vorhanden Hebridae - Antennen 4-gliedrig, alle Segmente
    [Show full text]
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report
    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report110
    ~ ~ WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A Survey of Rare and Endangered Mayflies of Selected RESEARCH Rivers of Wisconsin by Richard A. Lillie REPORT110 Bureau of Research, Monona December 1995 ~ Abstract The mayfly fauna of 25 rivers and streams in Wisconsin were surveyed during 1991-93 to document the temporal and spatial occurrence patterns of two state endangered mayflies, Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex. Both species are candidates under review for addition to the federal List of Endang­ ered and Threatened Wildlife. Based on previous records of occur­ rence in Wisconsin, sampling was conducted during the period May-July using a combination of sampling methods, including dredges, air-lift pumps, kick-nets, and hand-picking of substrates. No specimens of Anepeorus simplex were collected. Three specimens (nymphs or larvae) of Acanthametropus pecatonica were found in the Black River, one nymph was collected from the lower Wisconsin River, and a partial exuviae was collected from the Chippewa River. Homoeoneuria ammophila was recorded from Wisconsin waters for the first time from the Black River and Sugar River. New site distribution records for the following Wiscon­ sin special concern species include: Macdunnoa persimplex, Metretopus borealis, Paracloeodes minutus, Parameletus chelifer, Pentagenia vittigera, Cercobrachys sp., and Pseudiron centra/is. Collection of many of the aforementioned species from large rivers appears to be dependent upon sampling sand-bottomed substrates at frequent intervals, as several species were relatively abundant during only very short time spans. Most species were associated with sand substrates in water < 2 m deep. Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex should continue to be listed as endangered for state purposes and receive a biological rarity ranking of critically imperiled (S1 ranking), and both species should be considered as candidates proposed for listing as endangered or threatened as defined by the Endangered Species Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Aquatic Insects in the Dicle (Tigris) River Basin, Turkey, with New Records
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2017) 41: 102-112 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1512-56 Spatial and temporal distribution of aquatic insects in the Dicle (Tigris) River Basin, Turkey, with new records Fatma ÇETİNKAYA, Aysel BEKLEYEN* Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey Received: 21.12.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 01.06.2016 Final Version: 25.01.2017 Abstract: We investigated insects of the Dicle (Tigris) River Basin in terms of their composition and spatiotemporal distribution. Larvae, pupae, pupal exuviae, and nymphs of insects were obtained from samples collected by a plankton net monthly during a 1-year period in 2008 and 2009 at seven different sites of the Dicle (Tigris) River Basin. A total of 35 taxa from the orders Trichoptera (1 taxon), Ephemeroptera (3 taxa), and Diptera (31 taxa) were identified. Chironomidae (Diptera) was the most diverse group and was represented by three major subfamilies, namely Tanypodinae (2 taxa), Orthocladiinae (19 taxa), and Chironominae (7 taxa). Among these species, Nanocladius (Nanocladius) spiniplenus Saether, 1977 is a new record for Turkey as well as for western Asia. In addition, the Psychomyia larvae found for the first time in the Dicle (Tigris) River Basin (Turkey) were described. Both taxa have been illustrated to warrant validation. Taxa number varied spatially from 6 to 14 and temporally from 2 to 12 during the sampling period. Along the river, Cricotopus bicinctus and Orthocladius (S.) holsatus were the most common taxa. Key words: Diptera, Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, Insecta, Dicle (Tigris) River 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus Punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams Erin D
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2017 Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams Erin D. Peterson South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Peterson, Erin D., "Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1677. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/1677 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVERTEBRATE PREY SELECTIVITY OF CHANNEL CATFISH (ICTALURUS PUNCTATUS) IN WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA PRAIRIE STREAMS BY ERIN D. PETERSON A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree for the Master of Science Major in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University 2017 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks provided funding for this project. Oak Lake Field Station and the Department of Natural Resource Management at South Dakota State University provided lab space. My sincerest thanks to my advisor, Dr. Nels H. Troelstrup, Jr., for all of the guidance and support he has provided over the past three years and for taking a chance on me.
    [Show full text]
  • Nearctic Chironomidae
    Agriculture I*l Canada A catalog of Nearctic Chironomidae A catalog of Catalogue des Nearctic Chironomidae Chironomidae delardgion ndarctique D.R. Oliver and M.E. Dillon D.R. Oliver et M.E. Dillon Biosystematics Research Centre Centre de recherches biosyst6matiques Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0C6 K1A 0C6 and et P.S. Cranston P.S. Cranston Commonwealth Scientific and Organisation de la recherche Industrial Research scientifique et industrielle du Organization, Entomology Commonwealth, Entomologie Canberra ACT 2601 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Australie Research Branch Direction g6n6rale de la recherche Agriculture Canada Agriculture Canada Publication 185718 Publication 185718 1 990 1 990 @Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1990 oMinistre des Approvisionnement et Services Canada 1990 Available in Canada through En vente au Canada par I'entremise de nos Authorized Bookstore Agents agents libraires agr66s et autres and other bmkstores libraires. or by mail from ou par la poste au Canadian Govemnent Publishing Centre Centre d'6dition du gouvemement du Supply and Servies Canada Canada Oltawa, Canada K1A 0S9 Approvisionnements et Seryies Canada Ottawa (Canada) K1A 0S9 Cat No. A43-I85'7ll99O N" de cat A43-785117990 ISBN 0-660-55839-4 ISBN 0-660-55839-4 Price subject to change without notic€ Prix sujet i changemenl sans pr6avis Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Donn6ee de catalogage avant publication (Canada) Oliver, D.R. Oliver, D.R. A mtalog of Nearctic Chironomidae A atalog of Nearctic Chironomidae (Publication ; 1857/8) (Publiation ; 18578) Text in English and French- Texle en anglais et en frangais. Includes bibliographiel referenes. Comprend des r6f6rences bibliogr. Issued by Research Branch, Agriculture Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • TB142: Mayflies of Maine: an Annotated Faunal List
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 4-1-1991 TB142: Mayflies of aine:M An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian K. Elizabeth Gibbs Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Burian, S.K., and K.E. Gibbs. 1991. Mayflies of Maine: An annotated faunal list. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 142. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 0734-9556 Mayflies of Maine: An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian and K. Elizabeth Gibbs Technical Bulletin 142 April 1991 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Mayflies of Maine: An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian Assistant Professor Department of Biology, Southern Connecticut State University New Haven, CT 06515 and K. Elizabeth Gibbs Associate Professor Department of Entomology University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Financial support for this project was provided by the State of Maine Departments of Environmental Protection, and Inland Fisheries and Wildlife; a University of Maine New England, Atlantic Provinces, and Quebec Fellow­ ship to S. K. Burian; and the Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. Dr. William L. Peters and Jan Peters, Florida A & M University, pro­ vided support and advice throughout the project and we especially appreci­ ated the opportunity for S.K. Burian to work in their laboratory and stay in their home in Tallahassee, Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding
    Full-time PhD studies of Ecology and Environmental Protection Piotr Gadawski Species diversity and origin of non-biting midges (Chironomidae) from a geologically young lake PhD Thesis and its old spring system Performed in Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology in Institute of Ecology and Environmental Protection Różnorodność gatunkowa i pochodzenie fauny Supervisor: ochotkowatych (Chironomidae) z geologicznie Prof. dr hab. Michał Grabowski młodego jeziora i starego systemu źródlisk Auxiliary supervisor: Dr. Matteo Montagna, Assoc. Prof. Łódź, 2020 Łódź, 2020 Table of contents Acknowledgements ..........................................................................................................3 Summary ...........................................................................................................................4 General introduction .........................................................................................................6 Skadar Lake ...................................................................................................................7 Chironomidae ..............................................................................................................10 Species concept and integrative taxonomy .................................................................12 DNA barcoding ...........................................................................................................14 Chapter I. First insight into the diversity and ecology of non-biting midges (Diptera: Chironomidae)
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Poteat, Monica Deshay
    ABSTRACT POTEAT, MONICA DESHAY. Comparative Trace Metal Physiology in Aquatic Insects. (Under the direction of Dr. David B. Buchwalter). Despite their dominance in freshwater systems and use in biomonitoring and bioassessment programs worldwide, little is known about the ion/metal physiology of aquatic insects. Even less is known about the variability of trace metal physiologies across aquatic insect species. Here, we measured dissolved metal bioaccumulation dynamics using radiotracers in order to 1) gain an understanding of the uptake and interactions of Ca, Cd and Zn at the apical surface of aquatic insects and 2) comparatively analyze metal bioaccumulation dynamics in closely-related aquatic insect species. Dissolved metal uptake and efflux rate constants were calculated for 19 species. We utilized species from families Hydropsychidae (order Trichoptera) and Ephemerellidae (order Ephemeroptera) because they are particularly species-rich and because they are differentially sensitive to metals in the field – Hydropsychidae are relatively tolerant and Ephemerellidae are relatively sensitive. In uptake experiments with Hydropsyche sparna (Hydropsychidae), we found evidence of two shared transport systems for Cd and Zn – a low capacity-high affinity transporter below 0.8 µM, and a second high capacity-low affinity transporter operating at higher concentrations. Cd outcompeted Zn at concentrations above 0.6 µM, suggesting a higher affinity of Cd for a shared transporter at those concentrations. While Cd and Zn uptake strongly co-varied across 12 species (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001), neither Cd nor Zn uptake significantly co-varied with Ca uptake in these species. Further, Ca only modestly inhibited Cd and Zn uptake, while neither Cd nor Zn inhibited Ca uptake at concentrations up to concentrations of 89 nM Cd and 1.53 µM Zn.
    [Show full text]
  • IV Trobada D'estudiosos De La Serralada Litoral Central I VIII Del
    Sèrie Territori i Parcs Naturals 7 IV Trobada d’Estudiosos de la Serralada Litoral Central i VIII del Montnegre i el Corredor Col·lecció Eines Sèrie Territori i Parcs Naturals El 20 i 21 de novembre de 2019 va tenir lloc a Vallgorguina la IV Trobada d’Estudiosos de la Serralada Litoral Central i VIII del Montnegre i el Corredor, amb l’objectiu de donar a conèixer els estudis i recerques duts a terme els últims quatre anys en diferents àmbits de les ciències socials i naturals del territori. En total es van presentar 47 comunicacions que van abordar temes rellevants i innovadors, però també estudis de base o projectes de gestió aplicada per a la conservació d’espècies o per al control d’espècies exòtiques, entre d’altres. Aquests treballs, que amb aquesta publicació tenim l’oportunitat de llegir amb detall, suposen una contribució inestimable per millorar el coneixement de la realitat d’aquests tres parcs, dels seus valors naturals, paisatgístics i culturals, i són de gran utilitat per al personal encarregat de gestionar-los i per a qualsevol persona interessada en la seva conservació. Col·lecció Eines Sèrie Territori i Parcs Naturals 7 IV Trobada d’Estudiosos de la Serralada Litoral Central i VIII del Montnegre i el Corredor Vallgorguina, 20 i 21 de novembre de 2019 Col·lecció Eines Primera edició: desembre de 2020 © dels textos: els seus autors © de l’edició: Diputació de Barcelona Coordinació: Gerència de Serveis d’Espais Naturals de la Diputació de Barcelona Producció: Gabinet de Premsa i Comunicació de la Diputació de Barcelona Composició:
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Fauna of the Middle Portion of the Sauk River, Stearns County, Minnesota, 2010
    Evaluation of the Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Fauna of the Middle Portion of the Sauk River, Stearns County, Minnesota, 2010 . Submitted to: Sauk River Watershed District 524 Fourth Street South Sauk Centre, Minnesota 56378 Submitted by: Lake Superior Research Institute University of Wisconsin-Superior 801 North 28 th Street Superior, Wisconsin 54880 Principal Investigator: Kurt L. Schmude, Ph.D. Senior Scientist April 28, 2011 INTRODUCTION The Sauk River Watershed District (District) entered into a Joint Powers Agreement under which the District would provide physical assessments, chemical monitoring, and aquatic macroinvertebrate assessment of aquatic habitats for the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The project is known as the Upper Sauk River Water Quality Assessment Project. The District worked in cooperation with the Lake Superior Research Institute (LSRI) at the University of Wisconsin-Superior in 2008 and 2009 to provide professional training to its staff in the collection of samples of aquatic macroinvertebrates, and to use these organisms to evaluate the water quality of the upper portion of the Sauk River (Schmude 2010). In the fall of 2010, the Sauk River Watershed District conducted a similar assessment for the middle reach of the Sauk River. The current report provides an evaluation of the water quality of the middle portion of the Sauk River for 2010 based on the aquatic macroinvertebrates. METHODS District personnel sampled six sites along the middle portion of the Sauk River in Stearns County on October 13, 2010. More sites would have been sampled, but high water in this section of the river prevented access to additional sites. The sites listed below are arranged in order from the most upstream site to the most downstream site.
    [Show full text]