Zhukov's Greatest Defeat?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zhukov's Greatest Defeat? Russian civilians look at the destroyed remains of their home following the Battle of Rzhev. Zhukov’s Greatest Defeat? By John M. Barr t 7:50 a.m. on 25 November Volga River, Rzhev was the focus of The fi ghting began in October 1941, 1942, approximately 10,000 intense military operations from as the Germans pushed on with their A guns and mortars unleashed October 1941 through January fi nal assault on Moscow. There was no a massive opening barrage heralding 1943. The bitter nature of fi ghting pause in military operations around the onset of Operation Mars against on this front was captured by A. Rzhev, as a salient was formed in the the German Rzhev salient. For the Tvardovsky who started his poem, German lines by the Soviet winter next 26 days, seven Soviet armies “I was killed near Rzhev” with: offensive of 1941-42. On 7 January comprised of seven tank corps and 37 1942, after the initial success of Russian rifl e divisions hurled themselves at the I was killed near Rzhev attacks on Army Group Center, Stalin German Ninth Army. In the end, little In a nameless bog ordered the Kalinin Front to attack the ground was taken in exchange appar- In Fifth company, juncture between Army Group North ently for massive Soviet casualties. On the Left fl ank and Army Group Center with an eye In a cruel air raid towards capturing Rzhev and pushing Earlier Fighting in on to cut the Minsk-Moscow highway, the Rzhev Salient I didn’t hear explosions severing Nazi rail communications. And did not see the fl ash Meeting an initial success, Lt. Gen. A relatively small city of 60,000 Down to an abyss from a cliff Yeremenko’s forces seized the large people on the northern end of the No start, no end German supply depot at Toropets, 32 WORLD at WAR 47 | APr – MAY 2016 capturing 450,000 shells, millions of south in the summer of 1942, Stalin did in his diary on 16 August 1942, “tense rounds of small arms ammunition, not let matters rest at the Rzhev salient. situation in Rzhev.” Gen. Halder’s nota- several food dumps, nearly 1,000 As the Germans broke through on their tions were in direct response to Gen. trucks, and six tanks. This early way to Stalingrad and the Caucasus Model’s communication that same day, success tore a nine-mile gap in the Mountains, Stalin ordered a series informing the high command that the German lines. Rzhev, however, did of attacks on the Rzhev salient and Ninth Army was nearly fi nished and not fall and as the Soviets regrouped near Leningrad to tie down German that if he did not receive three more to launch a fresh assault on the city. reserves. In August 1942, four Soviet divisions he would not be responsible The newly appointed commander of Armies, under the direction of Zhukov for the results. The divisions were sup- the Ninth Army, Panzer Gen. Model, and Konev, launched a fresh series plied and the crises passed. However, a launched a counter attack that helped of attacks in the Rzhev region. While precedent had been set, using attacks to encircle the Soviet 20th Army. By there were no decisive breakthroughs, on the Rzhev salient as a way to divert the middle of February, 6,000 men the Soviets did push the Germans back German attention from the south. were left in the 20th army when it at least 20 miles in some locations. began to attempt its breakout. More importantly, from a Soviet Operation Mars Preparations The net result of the fi rst Russian point of view, the Germans had to winter offensive in the Rzhev region move 25 divisions to this front to Given the repeated Soviet was a large salient in the Russian line contain Russian efforts, including at offensives in the Rzhev area from late that gave the Germans their closest least nine divisions from the south. The 1941 through the summer of 1942, it is positions to Moscow. While Hitler’s bitter fi ghting in these battles led Chief perhaps no surprise the area fi gured as offensive power was directed to the of the OKW Col. Gen. Halder, to note a signifi cant objective in Russian plans WORLD at WAR 47 | APr – MAY 2016 33 for counter attacks in late 1942. In Meanwhile, the 41st Army would addition, the fact Rzhev was a salient open operations with an attack by appealed to the Soviets as a potential the 6th Siberian Infantry Corps. This target in which to trap German troops corps was tasked with opening the much as the subsequent Kursk salient German defenses for exploitation was to lure in the Germans in July 1943. by the 1st and 2nd Mechanized Corps. In September 1942, while street The 22nd Army would attack with two fi ghting raged in Stalingrad, Stavka divisions, whose job it was to clear a (Soviet High Command) approved path for the 3rd Mechanized Corps. two operations. The more famous The Soviets also planned for the Operation Uranus, aimed at 30th and 39th Armies to attack the encircling the German Sixth Army salient from the north. This attack at Stalingrad, and Operation Mars, would not only trap the German which had the aim of encircling the forces, but also prevent their redeploy- German Ninth Army at Rzhev. ment to aid in the defense of the For Operation Mars, the Russians salient’s fl anks. All three attacks were allocated about 2,300 tanks, 10,000 slated to start on the same day. artillery pieces, and two fronts com- The original assault for Operation prised of seven armies. The basic plan Mars was scheduled for 12 October of attack was to launch simultaneous 1942. However, torrential rains in the assaults on each side of the salient and middle of the month reduced roads pinch it off in the middle. In the mean- to mud and forced a postponement time, German troops on the salient’s of the offensive. In the meantime, northern edge would be attacked with the Germans picked up hints of the the aim of tying down the troops up impending Soviet attack. In September, there and preventing their escape from German intelligence noted an increase any pocket that would be formed. in Russian rail traffi c near the Rzhev The 20th Army, under the command salient and by mid-October Berlin of Gen. Konev of the Western Front, began to suspect a Soviet offensive would strike from the east with the might be aimed at the Ninth Army 30th Army on its right fl ank. In the after the ground dried. Facing the west, the 41st and 22nd Armies, under 20th Army’s assault on the eastern Gen. Purkaev’s Kalinin Front, would face of the salient were three German launch the main attack. The 20th infantry divisions with a similar Army planned to attack the fi rst day three divisions on the western face. with four infantry divisions, which The Germans also deployed strong would open up the German defenses armored reserves comprised of two and allow the 6th Tank Corps and the panzer divisions and two motorized 2nd Guards Cavalry Corps to exploit divisions, including the powerful through and meet up with the Kalinin Grossdeutschland division, inside the Front. The 30th Army would launch salient. Model could call for immediate the offensive with three infantry divisions and two tank brigades. continued on page 36 » Russian civilians symbolically hand over new KV-1 tanks to the Soviet army, after donating to have the tanks built. 34 WORLD at WAR 47 | APr – MAY 2016 WORLD at WAR 47 | APR – MAY 2016 35 » continued from page 34 relief upon the army’s reserve of a panzer division located at the salient’s base and three additional panzer divi- sions in Army Group Center’s reserve. At the end of October 1942, Zhukov fl ew to Moscow to discuss both Mars and Uranus with Stalin. At that time, the fi nal assault for Uranus was set for 16 November, and Mars for 25 November. On 6 November 1942, the Germans issued a new intelligence estimate based upon their alleged super spy, code-named Max. According to Max, attacks were due near Vorenezh, Grozny, south of Leningrad, but no mention appears to have been made of Stalingrad. After meeting with Stalin, Zhukov spent the middle of November near Stalingrad inspecting Soviet preparations for Uranus. Soviet T-34 tanks, mainstay of the Soviet armored force throughout the war. 36 WORLD at WAR 47 | APr – MAY 2016 Soviet anti-tank crews preparing to engage German armor. Defeat on the Salient’s Operation Mars. Further south, the resupply continued to be hampered Eastern Front German defenders infl icted a similar by stubborn German defense, and the drubbing on the three infantry divi- Russians were unable to effectively The Russian artillery barrage that sions on the 20th Army’s right fl ank. In exploit this modest success. heralded the opening of Operation 20th Army’s center, however, the 247th Mars on the eastern face of the salient Division achieved results positive lasted 90 minutes. Unfortunately, enough to allow Konev to order the 6th heavy snow and fog limited the Tank Corps into battle the next day. barrage’s effectiveness. The snow also Poor weather and wretched roads hindered Soviet efforts to use their air hampered Soviet efforts to reinforce force for direct support and to interdict the 20th army’s limited success. the movement of German reinforce- Furthermore, the Germans clung tena- ments.
Recommended publications
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016
    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Base Report V1.1 MLT FINAL
    Supply Base Report: MLT Ltd www.sustainablebiomasspartnership.org Focusing on sustainable sourcing solutions Completed in accordance with the Supply Base Report Template Version 1.1 For further information on the SBP Framework and to view the full set of documentation see www.sustainablebiomasspartnership.org Document history Version 1.0: published 26 March 2015 Version 1.1 published 22 February 2016 © Copyright The Sustainable Biomass Partnership Limited 2016 Supply Base Report: MLT Page ii Focusing on sustainable sourcing solutions Contents 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Description of the Supply Base ...................................................................................................... 2 2.1 General description ................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Actions taken to promote certification amongst feedstock supplier ...................................................... 10 2.3 Final harvest sampling programme ....................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Flow diagram of feedstock inputs showing feedstock type [optional] .................................................... 10 2.5 Quantification of the Supply Base ......................................................................................................... 10 3 Requirement for
    [Show full text]
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 Moscow, May 2006 CONTENT Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 Summary...........................................................................................................................................5 Article 2 ..........................................................................................................................................14 Measures taken to improve the conditions in detention facilities .............................................14 Measures to improve the situation in penal institutions and protection of prisoners’ human rights ..........................................................................................................................................15 Measures taken to improve the situation in temporary isolation wards of the Russian Ministry for Internal Affairs and other custodial places ..........................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent torture and cruel and depredating treatment in work of police and other law-enforcement institutions ............................................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent cruel treatment in the armed forces ................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronicle of Novgorod 1016-1471
    - THE CHRONICLE OF NOVGOROD 1016-1471 TRANSLATED FROM THE RUSSIAN BY ROBERT ,MICHELL AND NEVILL FORBES, Ph.D. Reader in Russian in the University of Oxford WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY C. RAYMOND BEAZLEY, D.Litt. Professor of Modern History in the University of Birmingham AND AN ACCOUNT OF THE TEXT BY A. A. SHAKHMATOV Professor in the University of St. Petersburg CAMDEN’THIRD SERIES I VOL. xxv LONDON OFFICES OF THE SOCIETY 6 63 7 SOUTH SQUARE GRAY’S INN, W.C. 1914 _. -- . .-’ ._ . .e. ._ ‘- -v‘. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE General Introduction (and Notes to Introduction) . vii-xxxvi Account of the Text . xxx%-xli Lists of Titles, Technical terms, etc. xlii-xliii The Chronicle . I-zzo Appendix . 221 tJlxon the Bibliography . 223-4 . 225-37 GENERAL INTRODUCTION I. THE REPUBLIC OF NOVGOROD (‘ LORD NOVGOROD THE GREAT," Gospodin Velikii Novgorod, as it once called itself, is the starting-point of Russian history. It is also without a rival among the Russian city-states of the Middle Ages. Kiev and Moscow are greater in political importance, especially in the earliest and latest mediaeval times-before the Second Crusade and after the fall of Constantinople-but no Russian town of any age has the same individuality and self-sufficiency, the same sturdy republican independence, activity, and success. Who can stand against God and the Great Novgorod ?-Kto protiv Boga i Velikago Novgoroda .J-was the famous proverbial expression of this self-sufficiency and success. From the beginning of the Crusading Age to the fall of the Byzantine Empire Novgorod is unique among Russian cities, not only for its population, its commerce, and its citizen army (assuring it almost complete freedom from external domination even in the Mongol Age), but also as controlling an empire, or sphere of influence, extending over the far North from Lapland to the Urals and the Ob.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepcon CB Public Summary Report V1.0 MLT FINAL
    NEPCon Evaluation of MLT Ltd Compliance with the SBP Framework: Public Summary Report www.sustainablebiomasspartnership.org Focusing on sustainable sourcing solutions Completed in accordance with the CB Public Summary Template Version 1.0 For further information on the SBP Framework and to view the full set of documentation see www.sustainablebiomasspartnership.org Document history Version 1.0: published 26 March 2015 © Copyright The Sustainable Biomass Partnership Limited 2015 NEPCon Evaluation of MLT: Public Summary Report Page ii Focusing on sustainable sourcing solutions Contents 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Scope of the evaluation and SBP certificate ................................................................................. 2 3 Specific objective ............................................................................................................................. 4 4 SBP Standards utilised .................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 SBP StanDarDs utiliseD ........................................................................................................................... 5 4.2 SBP-endorsed Regional Risk Assessment ............................................................................................. 5 5 Description of Biomass Producer, Supply Base and Forest Management ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Printing "Welcome"
    Rzhev ’42 – Designer Notes Table of Contents I. Design Notes A. Introduction B. German Order of Battle C. Soviet Order of Battle D. Weather E. Making the Scenarios II. The Scenarios A. Scenario List B. Scenario Overviews III. Operation Mars Revisited – by David Glantz Endnotes IV. German Military Abbreviations and Terms V. Bibliography A. Operational Books B. Order of Battle, and Organizational Books C. Unit Histories D. Map Books E. Archival Records Design Notes A. Introduction After reading David Glantz’s book "Zhukov’s Greatest Defeat", I became intrigued with this unknown, but major operation. According to Col Glantz, the Soviet forces used for Operation Mars, were substantially larger then the more well known Operation Uranus, the counterattack at Stalingrad. Two Soviet fronts, Kalinin and Western, seven Armies, consisting of 667,000 men and over 1900 tanks, attacked on 25 November 1942 with the goal of destroying the German 9th Army, pinching off the Rzhev salient, and eliminating the threat this salient posed to Moscow. By attacking in four directions, the Soviets planned on tying down what little mobile reserves the Germans had, and not allowing them to be deployed elsewhere. The battle was fought during blizzard-like snowstorms which, along with the poor terrain in the area, contributed mightily to the Soviet defeat. The Germans fought back hard, with a stubborn defense, their strong points holding out behind the Soviet lines, further complicating moving the second echelon offensive troops forward. Beside the two panzer divisions in reserve of 9.AOK (9th Army), the Germans were able to send three more panzer divisions, from Heersgruppe (Army Group) reserve, to halt the offensive and counterattack.
    [Show full text]
  • I from KAMCHATKA to GEORGIA the BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT
    FROM KAMCHATKA TO GEORGIA THE BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT AND EARLY SOVIET SPATIAL PRACTICE by Robert F. Crane B.A., Georgia State University, 2001 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 2005 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DEITRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Robert F. Crane It was defended on March 27, 2013 and approved by Atillio Favorini, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts Kathleen George, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts Vladimir Padunov, PhD, Professor, Slavic Languages and Literature Dissertation Advisor: Bruce McConachie, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts ii Copyright © by Robert Crane 2013 iii FROM KAMCHATKA TO GEORGIA THE BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT AND EARLY SOVIET SPATIAL PRACTICE Robert Crane, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 The Blue Blouse movement (1923-1933) organized thousands of workers into do-it-yourself variety theatre troupes performing “living newspapers” that consisted of topical sketches, songs, and dances at workers’ clubs across the Soviet Union. At its peak the group claimed more than 7,000 troupes and 100,000 members. At the same time that the movement was active, the Soviet state and its citizens were engaged in the massive project of building a new society reflecting the aims of the Revolution. As Vladimir Paperny has argued, part of this new society was a new spatial organization, one that stressed the horizontal over the
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Projects Effectiveness
    ISSN 0798 1015 HOME Revista ESPACIOS ÍNDICES / Index A LOS AUTORES / To the AUTORS ! ! ! Vol. 40 (Number 11) Year 2019. Page 17 Participatory projects effectiveness La eficacia de los proyectos participativos TSURKAN Marina 1 Received: 29/11/2018 • Approved: 27/02/2019 • Published 08/04/2019 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Results 4. Conclusions Acknowledgements Bibliographic references ABSTRACT: RESUMEN: The relevance of the article is caused by the insufficient La relevancia de este artículo es debida a la falta de estudios development of the evaluation system for participatory publicados sobre la evaluación de eficacia de los proyectos projects effectiveness. The objective of this paper is to participativos dentro de Rusia. El objetivo del presente formulate the basic principles of the evaluation methods for estudio es desarrollar los principios de la metodología effectiveness of participatory projects financing and evaluatoria para el financiamiento y la gerencia de los management. The article distinguishes between the notions proyectos participativos. El artículo diferencia eficacia de of effectiveness and efficiency, reveals 12 funding models for eficiencia, muestra 12 modelos de financiamiento, usados participatory projects at the territory of the Russian para los proyectos participativos en la Federación Rusa. El Federation. The author proposes and partially tests autor ha propuesto y parcialmente evaluado la metodología corresponding methods, as exemplified by the most common correspondiente, ilustrada por RA2MA2С el modelo más model RA2MA2С, under which local authorities support frecuente usado para implementar el programa de apoyo program is implemented. The identified issues are the lack of para iniciativas locales. Los problemas principales son la falta publicly available information for most of methods de los datos en público para la mayoría de los factores implementation factors and the achievement of the importantes en la implementación de la metodología y el effectiveness in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Tver State Medical Academy,Russia
    Welcome to Tver State Medical Academy Bazhenov D.V. Vice Chancellor for international students Welcome to our medical academy, an institution replete with tradition, values, enthusiasm, quality and international prestige. Our educational model is student-oriented. Opportunities to learn for yourself and to participate in a research project are highly recommended. Throughout your medical training you will witness many very rich opportunities to exchange opinions and ideas with classmates from different countries, thus increasing your awareness of cultural diversity and placing you on the correct tract to treat patients of different cultures. In our renowned Program of Medicine in the Community, opportunities to increase your clinical skills abound. Your participation in supporting the underserved population will be enormously appreciated and of immense benefit to you. You will be one of the foreign students who develop, practice and master bilingual skills while also developing skills related to humanism, professionalism and altruism. The Tver State Medical Academy works arduously to assure that at the end of your training you will be a physician with a special profile: a knowledgeable, dutiful, clinician, communicator, researcher, and long-term learner for the benefit of your community. he City Tver Central Federal District Tver Region Tver region is the largest of the 11 regions of the central Russia. Its territory is 84100 square kms and it includes 36 administrative districts, 23 towns & 8941 small villages. Population of Tver region is 1.6 million people. The City of Tver ( formerly called Kalinin from 1931 to 1990 ) was founded in 1246, it was the capital of a powerful medieval state and later the typical provincial town of the Russian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Date Location Activity Chain of Command 2S
    24 161. INFANTERIE-DIVISION - UNIT HISTORY DATE LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN OF COMMAND 1939/11/01 Allenstein, Goldap, Wehrkreis I Formation, training Subordinate to: Wehrkr.Kdo. I, 1939/11/01-1940/04/29 (source: Potsdam catalog) C.O.: Gen.Maj. Hermann Wilck, 1939/12/01-1941/09/17 J940/01/26 Zinten, Landsberg, Kaiserslautern Transfer, training Subordinate to: AK 23, 1940/05/04-1940/06/03 1940/05/25 Luxembourg, Holland, Invasion, offensive engagements AK 31, 1940/06/05-1940/07/05 Verdun, Metz, France 1940/07/05 Elk, Olecko, Suwalki, Wehrkreis I Transfer, training AK 26, 1940/07/06-1941/04/10 AK 6, 1941/04/11- 1941/04/19 1941/06/22 Grodno, Lida, Volozhin, Borisov, Invasion of Russia, offensive AK 8, 1941/04/20- 1941/06/26 Orsha, Soviet Union operations AK 5, 1941/06/27- 1941/07/06 AK 8, 1941/07/06- 1941/07/15 AOK 9, 1941/07/16 -1941/08/03 1941/08/20 Smolensk, Yartsevo, Nikitinka, Offensive engagements AK 8, 1941/08/04-1941/09/18 Rzhev C.O.: Gen.Lt. Heinrich Recke, 1941/09/17-1943/08/15 Subordinate to: AK 5, 1941/09/19-1941/10/01 AOK 9, 1941/10/02-1941/10/07 AK 6, 1941/10/07-1941/10/13 AK 27, 1941/10/14-1941/10/23 1941/11/01 Kalinin Defensive operations AK 41, 1941/10/24-1941/11/20 AK 27, 1941/11/21-1941/12/15 1941/12/23 Rzhev, Voiga River Withdrawal, formation of Gruppe Recke, AK 6, 1941/12/16-1942/01/18 counterattack 1942/01/31 Rzhev, Zubtsov Disbandment of Gruppe Recke, AK 27, 1942/02/01-1942/03/08 position defense as 161.ID 1942/03/10 Volga River, Rzhev Re-formation of Gruppe Recke, AOK 9, 1942/03/09-1942/05/09 defense of the corps sector
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 341 5th International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education (ICADCE 2019) Archaic Aerophones and Idiophones in Modern Russian Culture Vladimir Lisovoi Angelina Alpatova Department of Music Theory and History Department of Music Theory Russian State Specialized Academy of Arts Russian State Gnessin Academy of Music Moscow, Russia Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Abstract—Such archaic aerophones and idiophones as shape in Eurasia and trumpet with direct shape in America. horns and vargan (jew's harp) play important role in both The sounds of twisted horn shofar that was used in Ancient traditional and modern Russian culture. The scientific interest Israel (XV – XIV centuries BC) can be listened now in to this problem is characterized by the archaeomusicology, synagogues in different countries. ethnomusicology, musical anthropology and sociology. The article is dedicated to research in a comparative way the Neolithic culture is represented by ceramic horn aspects of the traditions with their different styles according to Taotszyao with the bull horn' shape from Linyanhe (III the geographical regions. Tver and Vadimir horns', Altai and millennium BC, Shandong Province, China) (see "Fig. 1"). Sibir vargans' playing is usually used in festivals, concerts, In the Bronze Age the horns were made of bronze (XII – VI scientific studies and domestic musical practice. A special centuries BC, Scandinavian bronze lurs; one of them is in research area is the reconstruction of ancient instruments with Hermitage, St.-Petersburg) (see "Fig. 2"). The horns which new manufacturing technologies and materials. were depicted on the Bonampak frescoes (I millennium BC – I millennium AD, Mexico) resemble about direct tubes (see Keywords—Russian folk music; aerophone; idiophone; horn; "Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Russia (Incl
    Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Russia (incl. Ukraine, Belarus & Bessarabia) By Henry L. deZeng IV Kharkov-Rogan I Photo credit: U.S. National Archives, Photographic and Cartographic Division.; taken 14 Sept. 1941. Kharkov-Rogan I was built in 1930 for use as a military flight school. It had 8 medium and large aircraft hangars and 1 very large repair hangar, approx. 40 permanent barrack buildings, 3 workshops, admin buildings and storage structures, an oval athletic track and other facilities all grouped along the W boundary and SW corner of the landing area. There were about 10 additional structures along the S boundary that may have been for aircraft servicing and stores. Additionally, there were 22 blast bays for twin-engine and single-engine aircraft spaced along the W and S boundaries of the landing area. A separate supply dump with its own rail spur was approx. 1 km S of the airfield. Nearly all of these buildings had been destroyed or badly damaged by 1944, the majority of them blown up by the retreating Germans. Edition: February 2020 Airfields Russia (incl. Ukraine, Belarus & Bessarabia) Introduction Conventions 1. For the purpose of this reference work, “Russia” generally means the territory belonging to the country in September 1939, the month of the German attack on Poland and the generally accepted beginning of World War II, including that part of eastern Poland (i.e., Belarus, Belorussia, Weissruthenien) and western Ukraine annexed by the Soviet Union on 29 September 1939 following the USSR’s invasion of Poland on 17 September 1939. Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina were seized by the USSR between 26 June and 3 July 1940.
    [Show full text]