The Netherlands (Updated 2015)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Netherlands (Updated 2015) The Netherlands (Updated 2015) 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. Country overview Located at the delta of the rivers Rhine, IJssel and Meuse, the Netherlands is a densely populated country on low lands, with 16.8 million inhabitants living on a surface of 41 500 square kilometres, out of which 20% is located below and 50% less than one metre above sea level. While the north around Groningen is less populated, the overall population density is high (403.9 inhabitants per square kilometre), notably in the western parts of the country, around the Randstad area with the cities of The Hague, Rotterdam, Amsterdam and Utrecht. Despite the overall decrease in population growth (0.3% in 2012 versus 1.5% in 1990), the number of households and single-person homes is increasing, which results in higher infrastructure and housing needs. As a major trading hub, the Netherlands plays a significant role in the international commodity trade from and to Europe, as it hosts Europe’s largest port in Rotterdam. The Netherlands is the largest importer and exporter of oil and oil products in the world and a leading exporter of agricultural products (cattle, crop and greenhouse horticulture).The country has invested in infrastructure, including road, rail, aviation and maritime transportation, connecting the Netherlands to its European neighbours, and global trade. 1.1.1. Governmental System The Netherlands shares borders with Belgium and Germany, and has maritime borders with the United Kingdom. The capital is Amsterdam, while the seat of government is located in The Hague. The Kingdom of the Netherlands is divided into 12 provinces in North-West Europe; three overseas special municipalities in the Caribbean (islands of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, also known as the BES islands) and 408 municipalities. It is a parliamentary democracy organised as a unitary state. The Netherlands is a constitutional monarchy since 1815 and a parliamentary democracy since 1848. On 30 April 2013, King Willem-Alexander was confirmed as head of state. Following the 2012 general elections, Prime Minister Mark Rutte, head of government since October 2010 and leader of the liberal People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), was reconfirmed for a second term in a coalition government together with the Labour Party (PvdA) under the leadership of Lodewijk Asscher. In November 2012, the second Rutte Cabinet was formed. The Netherlands has a tradition of coalition governments in a multi-party system; no single party has held a majority in Parliament since the 19th century. Policies on social and economic matters are made in close consultation with the trade unions and employers organisations, represented through the Social-Economic Council (SER). 1 1.1.2. Geography and Climate The Netherlands lies between latitudes 50° and 54° N, and longitudes 3° and 8° E. The country is divided into two main sections by three large rivers: the Rhine (Rijn), the Waal and the Meuse (Maas). The south-western part of the Netherlands is a river delta and two tributaries of the Scheldt (Westerschelde and Oosterschelde). The predominant wind direction in the Netherlands is southwest, resulting in a moderate maritime climate with cool summers and mild winters. Ice days (maximum temperature below 0°C) usually occur between December and February, while freezing days (minimum temperature below 0°C) occur much more often, usually appearing between mid-November and late March. Warm days (maximum temperature above 20°C) are typically recorded between April and September, while summer days (maximum temperature above 25°C) are usually measured from May until August. Tropical days (maximum temperature above 30°C) occur rarely, in the Netherlands, and are generally only found in the months of June and August. Precipitation throughout the year is relatively equally shared by each month. 1.1.3. Population Population growth, density, and urban population as a percentage of the total population are shown in table 1, below. TABLE 1. POPULATION INFORMATION Average annual growth rate (%) Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2010 2013 2000 to 2013 Population (millions)1) 13.0 14.1 14.9 15.9 16.3 16.6 16.8 0.42 Population density (inhabitants/km2)2) 384.0 415.0 439.0 468.0 483.0 491 498 0.48 Urban Population as % of total 3) 62 65 69 77 83 87 89 1.12 Area (1000 km2) 4) 33.9 33.8 33.7 33.7 -0.05 Source: Statistics Netherlands and World Bank (World Development Indicators). 1) http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=70072NED&D1=0- 88&D2=0.2.11.24.68.94.466&D3=9-10.15.19-20&HDR=T&STB=G1.G2&VW=T 2) http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=37296ned&D1=68&D2=0.10.20.30.40.50.55.60.63- 64&HDR=G1&STB=T&VW=T 3) http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/reports/tableview.aspx# 4) http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=70072NED&D1=0.270- 271&D2=0&D3=0.5.10.15.18-20&HDR=T&STB=G1.G2&VW=T 1.1.4. Economic Data The Dutch economy withstood the global financial and economic crisis. During a double recession in 2008-12. domestic demand slowed down and unemployment increased (5.3% in 2012).1 In 2012. the total gross domestic product (GDP) amounted to EUR 599.34 billion in current market prices.2 At times of low domestic demand and slow-down in world trade amid the global financial turmoil. an open economy. like the Netherlands. is impacted more than other countries. Thanks to a strong fiscal consolidation course and high trade activities as well as Dutch foreign direct investment. economic recovery is slowly on its way. leading to a current account surplus of 10% of GDP in 2012. 2 TABLE2. GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP) Average annual growth rate (%) 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2005 2013 2000 to 2013 GDP (millions of current US$) 37.530 191.908 313.038 413.397 672.357 836.390 853390 5.7 GDP (millions of constant 2000 US$) 245623 328981 410120 560858 595006 642196) 637865 1.0 GDP per capita (PPP* current US$/capita) .. .. 18.740 31.582 36.986 44.743 46.162 3.0 GDP per capita (current US$/capita) 2.876 13.562 20.937 25.958 41.199 50.338 50.793 5.3 * PPP: Purchasing Power Parity Source: World Bank (World Development Indicators). http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/reports/tableview.aspx# 1.2. Energy Information The Netherlands has an advanced economy with a modern energy system and well developed energy markets. The country’s strategic location makes it an important transit and trade hub for natural gas. coal. oil and electricity. The Netherlands has significant natural gas production and a large oil-refining and chemical industry. The Dutch energy sector is strong. drives exports. innovation and economic growth. In 2010. the Dutch energy sector reached almost EUR 55 billion or 10.9% of Dutch GDP. generated around EUR 15 billion worth in exports and a net value-added of EUR 26.74 billion. There were around 1 270 firms and 47 000 people (full time equivalents) working in the energy industry. Revenues from the gas sector accounted for EUR 13 billion and around 70 000 jobs. The country is both a major exporter and importer of energy. and so the competitiveness of Dutch industry also depends on affordable and secure energy supplies. The openness of the Dutch market place and the high share of trade have made the country resistant. but also exposed to the developments in global energy markets. While in 1989 the Netherlands was among the most competitive economies (next to Japan and Switzerland). in 2013 the country ranks 14th. indicating the acceleration of globalisation and increasing competitiveness pressure. The energy policy of the Netherlands (a founding member state of the European Union). is also framed by EU requirements on issues such as the electricity and gas markets. energy efficiency. renewable energy. state aid. the environment and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. As the country is a major trade and transit hub for oil. gas. electricity and coal. close co-operation with its neighbouring countries (Benelux. the Pentalateral Energy Forum and North Sea Region) has been a priority and expanded from the electricity and gas markets to new energy policy challenges. including the transition to a low-carbon economy. the increase in the use of renewable energies. carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the North Sea. and to security of oil and gas supply. Total primary energy supply (TPES) in the Netherlands was 78.6 million tonnes of oilequivalent (Mtoe) in 2012. The supply of energy peaked at 83.4 Mtoe in 2010 and has since declined for two consecutive years. Despite this contraction. TPES 3 was higher in 2012 compared to ten years earlier. increasing by 3.8% since 2002. The Netherland’s energy mix is dominated by fossil fuels which represent more than 90% of TPES. Natural gas supplied 41.7% of energy in 2012. followed by oil at 39.4% and coal at 10.4%. With less than 6% of total supply. renewable energy is made up of biofuels and waste (4.7% of TPES). wind (0.5%) and solar (0.1%). Nuclear accounts for 1.3% of TPES. and the use of geothermal is still at the development stage. The importance of hydropower is marginal and provides a mere 0.01% of total energy. Over the past decade. there has been a slight shift in the energy mix towards more use of renewables. Thus. the penetration of fossil fuels has fallen from 94% of TPES in 2002 to 91.5% in 2012.
Recommended publications
  • Report on the First Three Quarters of 2014
    REPORT ON THE FIRST THREE QUARTERS OF 2014 • Operating result of €2.9 billion as forecast • Net fi nancial debt down by €2.3 billion • Outlook for 2014 confi rmed • RWE plants pre-qualify for UK capacity market AT A GLANCE RWE Group – key figures1 Jan – Sep Jan – Sep + /− Jan – Dec 2014 2013 % 2013 Electricity production billion kWh 151.2 160.7 − 5.9 218.2 External electricity sales volume billion kWh 191.7 200.0 − 4.2 270.9 External gas sales volume billion kWh 184.6 228.7 − 19.3 320.7 External revenue € million 35,288 38,698 − 8.8 52,425 EBITDA € million 4,700 6,048 − 22.3 7,904 Operating result € million 2,908 4,190 − 30.6 5,369 Income from continuing operations before tax € million 1,470 1,251 17.5 − 2,016 Net income € million 994 609 63.2 − 2,757 Recurrent net income € million 763 1,915 − 60.2 2,314 Earnings per share € 1.62 0.99 63.6 − 4.49 Recurrent net income per share € 1.24 3.12 − 60.3 3.76 Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations € million 4,759 4,503 5.7 4,803 Capital expenditure € million 2,284 2,526 − 9.6 3,978 Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets € million 2,197 2,458 − 10.6 3,848 Financial assets € million 87 68 27.9 130 Free cash flow € million 2,562 2,045 25.3 960 30 Sep 2014 31 Dec 2013 Net debt € million 30,709 30,727 − 0.1 Workforce2 60,439 64,896 − 6.9 1 See commentary on reporting on page 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech Ankie Broekers-Knol, President of the First Chamber of the States General of the Kingdom of the Netherlands
    Speech Ankie Broekers-Knol, President of the First Chamber of the States General of the Kingdom of the Netherlands XVIIth Meeting of the Association of European Senates Theme of the Meeting, Bern: The importance of the Senate in parliamentary decision-making In the parliamentary system of the Netherlands, the Senate performs the role of “chambre de réflexion”. The Senate scrutinizes all legislation that has been passed by the House of Representatives. It is the only institution that reviews the final text, including amendments, and checks whether it is in line with national and international law. In addition, the Senate of the Netherlands scrutinizes bills for legality, practicality, and enforceability. The Senate of the Netherlands does not have the right to amend bills, like some other European senates do. But it does have a full veto right, which is rare, if not unique among our European senates. We do not know the system of the navette. We can have a veto on bills that are before the Senate. However, we rarely use this veto. It would mean that the bill – and the years of effort that were put into it – would be off the table entirely. The whole legislative process would have to start from scratch. The real influence of the Senate of the Netherlands is much more subtle than its veto right suggests. Our main added value lies in the questions senators ask the cabinet regarding the congruity of the bill with other laws and the implementation of the bill. The answers to these questions by the Senate are often used by the judiciary to interpret a bill’s meaning once it has been enacted into law.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Responsibility. Report 2013 XXXXX U1 Our Responsibility
    Our Responsibility. Report 2013 XXXXX U1 Our Responsibility. Report 2013 KAPITEL HEAD EARNING TRUST. Our Responsibility. Report 2013 CONTENT Interview with Peter Terium 1 About this Report 66 Report Profile 66 Our Greatest Challenges 3 Independent Assurance Report 68 Corporate Challenges 3 Index According to GRI Environmental Challenges 6 (Global Reporting Initiative) 71 Social Challenges 13 GRI Level Check Statement 73 Governance Challenges 16 UN Global Compact Progress Report 2013 74 CR Strategy and Management 20 Group Portrait 20 Key Figures at a Glance 76 Value Chain: activities and challenges 23 Our Regions 26 Contact and Imprint 79 Corporate Responsibility Strategy 33 Materiality Analysis 2013 35 Our Company 80 CR Management 37 Additional Management Systems 38 Stakeholder Dialogue 41 CR Programme 43 Our CR Areas for Action 46 Climate Protection 46 Energy Efficiency 48 Biodiversity/Environmental Protection 50 Community Engagement 52 Customer Trust 54 Employees 56 Supply Chain 58 Occupational Safety and Healthcare Management 60 Security of Supply 62 Innovation 64 Our Responsibility. Report 2013 Interview with Peter Terium 1 INTERVIEW WITH PETER TERIUM CEO of RWE AG Mr Terium, the restructuring of the European energy RWE wants to be a partner for the energy transition. system is moving forward. Like any major process of But do our citizens want RWE to be a partner? change, there will be winners and losers. Which side We have a lot of supporters. More than 23 mil- will RWE be on at the end of the journey? lion people put their trust in RWE’s expertise It would not be good if the energy transition every day: our customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Tests for UK Non Nuclear Power Plants
    Office for Nuclear Regulation An agency of HSE Stress tests for UK Non Nuclear Power Plants Progress Report 5 December 2011 Progress Report on Stress tests for UK Non Nuclear Power Plants Office for Nuclear Regulation An agency of HSE © Crown copyright 2011 First published December 2011 ONR Report ONR‐UKST‐REP‐11‐001 Revision 0 You may reuse this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view the licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open‐ government‐licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email [email protected]. Some images and illustrations may not be owned by the Crown so cannot be reproduced without permission of the copyright owner. Enquiries should be sent to [email protected]. Unless otherwise stated, all corporate names, logos, and Registered® and Trademark™ products mentioned in this Web site belong to one or more of the respective Companies or their respective licensors. They may not be used or reproduced in any manner without the prior written agreement of the owner(s). For published documents, the electronic copy on the ONR website remains the most current publicly available version and copying or printing renders this document uncontrolled. This document is issued by the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), an agency of HSE. For further information about ONR, or to report inconsistencies or inaccuracies in this publication please visit www.hse.gov.uk/nuclear. Progress Report on Stress tests for UK Non Nuclear Power Plants Office for Nuclear Regulation An agency of HSE Executive Summary Following the events at Fukushima, Japan on 11 March 2011, the nuclear industry in the UK responded quickly to review UK plants against seismic and flooding hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Liberties: 1 Aggregate Score: 99 Freedom Rating: 1.0 Overview
    Netherlands Page 1 of 6 Published on Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org) Home > Netherlands Netherlands Country: Netherlands Year: 2018 Freedom Status: Free Political Rights: 1 Civil Liberties: 1 Aggregate Score: 99 Freedom Rating: 1.0 Overview: The Netherlands is a parliamentary democracy with a strong record of safeguarding political rights and civil liberties. Nevertheless, wariness of immigration and Muslim minorities has grown in recent years, and harsh policies toward irregular migrants and asylum seekers have been a source of controversy. Political Rights and Civil Liberties: POLITICAL RIGHTS: 40 / 40 A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 12 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The Netherlands is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The role of the monarch is largely ceremonial. The prime minister is the head of government and is appointed by the monarch after elections. The incumbent prime minister, Mark Rutte, won a third term following parliamentary elections held in March 2017. He formed a coalition government consisting of his own center-right People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) https://freedomhouse.org/print/50094 9/24/2018 Netherlands Page 2 of 6 alongside the Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA), Democrats 66 (D66), and the Christian Union. It took a record 225 days for the coalition to form, reflecting the fragmentation in Dutch politics. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The Netherlands has a bicameral parliament that consists of the 75-seat First Chamber, which is elected indirectly to four-year terms in a proportional vote by the 12 provincial council members; and the 150-seat Second Chamber, which is elected to terms of four years by proportional representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Safety
    connecting global wealth creators ASIANASIANNUCLEAR NUCLEAR ENERGY ENERGY Powering Global Nuclear Commerce Vol. 2 Issue 3 Sept - Oct 2011 Learning Lessons In Nuclear Safety Dr. Eric Loewen, President, ANS ONE CONFERENCE NUCLEAR POWER THAT PROSPECT CONNECTS YOU TO THE Date: 17th-18th November, 2011 ENTIRE Venue: Kempinski Hotel Beijing LuŌhansa Center,Beijing China NUCLEAR MARKET Unrivalled Speaker represenƟng 8 fast-growing: This conference CHINA NaƟonal Nuclear Safety AdministraƟon is designed for China Nuclear Energy AssociaƟon (CNEA) industry China NaƟonal Nuclear CorporaƟon (CNNC) China Guangdong Nuclear Power Group (CGNPC) players State Nuclear Power Technology CorporaƟon (SNPTC) aiming to map out INDIA dynamic Atomic Energy Commission strategies to Department of Atomic Energy win Nuclear Power CorporaƟon of India Ltd (NPCIL) market share in a rapidly SOUTH KOREA Korea Electric Power CorporaƟon (KEPCO) changing Korea Atomic Energy Research InsƟtute (KAERI) industry Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) VIETNAM Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission (VAEC) Electricity of Vietnam (EVN) Register THAILAND Today! Electricity GeneraƟng Authority of Thailand (EGAT) Contact Michael LIU Via MONGOLIA T: +86 21 6840 7631 Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) F: +86 21 6840 7633 E: [email protected] USA W: www.cdmc.org.cn/npp Department of Energy (DOE) RUSSIA Rosatom 决策者会议策划集团-- 深具实力和影响力的独立品牌会议主办机构 - CDMC Events CDMC is China’s biggest large-scale B2B event company.We out-perform our competitors on the quality of the conferences we produce and the rapport we develop and maintain with our clients. +86 21 6840 7631 +86 21 6840 7633 www.cdmc.org.cn [email protected] UCLE N AR N S A O C I C R I E E ANS T M Y A • • I N N D O IA SECTI PRESENTS Friday, 30 September, 2011, Bombay Exhibition Centre, Goregaon (E), Mumbai, India.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist a Dissertation Submitted In
    The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair Professor Jason Wittenberg Professor Jacob Citrin Professor Katerina Linos Spring 2015 The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe Copyright 2015 by Kimberly Ann Twist Abstract The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair As long as far-right parties { known chiefly for their vehement opposition to immigration { have competed in contemporary Western Europe, scholars and observers have been concerned about these parties' implications for liberal democracy. Many originally believed that far- right parties would fade away due to a lack of voter support and their isolation by mainstream parties. Since 1994, however, far-right parties have been included in 17 governing coalitions across Western Europe. What explains the switch from exclusion to inclusion in Europe, and what drives mainstream-right parties' decisions to include or exclude the far right from coalitions today? My argument is centered on the cost of far-right exclusion, in terms of both office and policy goals for the mainstream right. I argue, first, that the major mainstream parties of Western Europe initially maintained the exclusion of the far right because it was relatively costless: They could govern and achieve policy goals without the far right.
    [Show full text]
  • Timmermans, A
    University of Groningen The Netherlands Otjes, Simon; Louwerse, T.; Timmermans, A. Published in: Opposition parties in European legislature IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2018 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Otjes, S., Louwerse, T., & Timmermans, A. (2018). The Netherlands: The reinvention of consensus democracy. In E. De Giorgi, & G. Ilonszki (Eds.), Opposition parties in European legislature: Conflict or consensus? (pp. 53-71). (Routledge Studies on Political Parties and Party Systems). Routledge. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
    [Show full text]
  • ALL the QUEEN's AGENTS & CORPORATIONS the Queen's
    ALL THE QUEEN’S AGENTS & CORPORATIONS The Queen’s Prerogative English law prohibits questioning the Monarchy about their personal holdings and business. This is true of most of Europe’s royalty, whether enthroned or not. The wealth of the Monarchies is held outside of the countries that made the wealth. The British Crown’s offshore banks hold the greatest personal wealth in the world estimated at $35 trillion. Perhaps the British Crown still owns and controls its Commonwealth Nations, including the American “colonies.” Monarchies are not supposed to be warlord bankers who create conflict and chaos to turn a profit or destabilize an economy for personal gain. But they have been for some time now, and history is a string of immoral wars caused by monarchies, the Vatican and other religions. Untold millions have died while kings and popes lived on to grab the wealth through well-established institutions that were created to control the people of the Earth. The Commonwealth of Nations, headed by Queen Elizabeth II, is made up of 53 nations, spanning the globe, accounting for one-fifth of the land mass of the Earth, and a very high percentage of its strategic resources and population. The Queen is a Knight of Malta and has vowed allegiance to the Pope through the largest insider trading club on the planet. The British Crown Agents are, in fact, also agents of the Vatican’s Knights of Malta. The Queen is a Knight of Malta The Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM) took control of the power and wealth of the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon from within the Roman system.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding a Place Within the Health Care System? a Comparative History of Palliative Care Services and National Policies in England and the Netherlands
    Finding a Place within the Health Care System? A Comparative History of Palliative Care Services and National Policies in England and the Netherlands A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health 2017 Aalbertha A H E van Reuler School of Medical Sciences List of Contents List of Contents............................................................................................... 1 List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................... 4 Declaration ..................................................................................................... 8 Copyright Statement ....................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 12 1.2 Connections to the Literature ........................................................................ 17 1.3 Aims and Scope of the Study ........................................................................ 29 1.4 Research Approach ...................................................................................... 31 1.5 Plan of the Thesis ........................................................................................ 44 Chapter 2 Palliative Care Services and Policies in England
    [Show full text]
  • References of Kraftwerksschule E.V. 1999 – 2018
    REFERENCES OF KRAFTWERKSSCHULE E.V. 1999 – 2018 THIS BROCHURE IS GOING TO BE EDITORIALLY REVISED AND UPDATED KRAFTWERKSSCHULE E.V. – training for the future INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES 02 REFERENCES – THEORETICAL TRAINING Theoretical Training Period Country Client Task 2018 Saudi Arabia TÜV Rheinland 1 report Saudi Arabia “Competency development for SEC” Competency Development for SEC (Saudi Electricity Company) 2018 India Gesellschaft für 1 training course internationale “Flexpert – Flexible operation of coal fired poewr plants” Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) for trainers from different Indian power plants 2018 India Gesellschaft für 1 report internationale “Required training for flexible operation of coal fired power plants” Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) 2018 Egypt Siemens AG 1 training course Energy Solutions “Water steam cycle” for operators of Burullus power plant 2018 Egypt Siemens AG 1 training course Energy Solutions “Steam turbine” for operators of Burullus power plant 2018 Egypt Siemens AG 1 training course Energy Solutions “HPO and laboratory training” for maintenance managers of Burullus power plant 2018 United Siemens AG 1 training course Kingdom Energy Solutions “CCPP fundamental operator training” for operators of Kings Lynn power plant 2018 Russia Siemens AG 1 training course Energy Solutions “Gas turbine, electrical and instrumentation & control” for operators of Grosny power plant 2018 Sudan Siemens AG 1 training course Energy Solutions “Gas turbine, electrical and instrumentation & control” for operators of Garri power plant 2018 Turkey
    [Show full text]
  • OSPAR Database on Offshore Wind-Farms, 2014 Update
    OSPAR database on offshore wind-farms 2014 UPDATE (revised in 2015) Biodiversity Series 2015 OSPAR Convention Convention OSPAR The Convention for the Protection of the La Convention pour la protection du milieu Marine Environment of the North-East marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la opened for signature at the Ministerial signature à la réunion ministérielle des Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention The Convention entered into force on 25 est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. March 1998. The Contracting Parties are Les Parties contractantes sont l'Allemagne, Belgium, Denmark, the European Union, la Belgique, le Danemark, l’Espagne, la Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne Kingdom. et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède, la Suisse et l’Union européenne. 2 of 17 OSPAR Commission, 2015 OSPAR Database on Offshore Wind-farms – 2014 Update (revised in 2015) The use of any renewable energy source makes a significant contribution towards climate protection and towards placing our energy supply on a sustainable ecological footing, thereby helping to conserve the natural balance. Nevertheless, the utilisation of renewable sources of energy can also have an adverse impact on the environment and our natural resources. Since 2001, OSPAR and its Biodiversity Committee (BDC) have been noting that the offshore wind energy sector has been rapidly expanding in the OSPAR maritime area.
    [Show full text]