Wind Energy Industry Impacts in Oklahoma November 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wind Energy Industry Impacts in Oklahoma November 2015 RESEARCH FOUNDATION REPORT Wind Energy Industry Impacts in Oklahoma November 2015 Prepared by Dr. Shannon L. Ferrell and Joshua Conaway, Oklahoma State University Department of Agricultural Economics Acknowledgments This project represents an unprecedented collection of data about the Oklahoma wind energy industry, and would not have been possible without the assistance of a number of state and county personnel who went far above and beyond their duties in assisting with the collection and analysis of this information. Ms. Kylah McNabb with the Oklahoma State Energy Office was incredibly generous in sharing information she had compiled over the course of 12 years regarding Oklahoma’s wind energy industry and also shared the benefit of her experience as a wind resource researcher and project developer. Her assistance was absolutely vital to compiling the portrait of Oklahoma’s wind energy industry presented in Section 1. Importantly, though, Ms. McNabb’s assistance was foundational to the project team’s understanding of all the issues researched through this project. Compiling the historical ad valorem tax data and building a sound ad valorem forecast model – the core of this report’s Section 2 – would have been impossible without the assistance of Gary Snyder (OSU Center for Local Government Technology Assessor Training Accreditation Program), Wade Patterson (Garfield County Assessor), Doug Brydon (Deputy Director of the Oklahoma Tax Commission’s Ad Valorem Division), and Dr. Notie Lansford (Director of the OSU County Training Program). Each made contributions of advice, experience, insight, data, and personal contacts enabling our project team to collect an exhaustive dataset on wind energy system ad valorem tax revenues over 20 counties and to build the forecast model. Further, the project team extends its sincere gratitude to all county treasurers and assessors who, in addition to their ordinary duties, compiled the tax data forming the foundation of Section 2’s analysis. Several of these county officers also devoted significant time to explaining the practical mechanics of the assessment and taxation of wind energy systems and to helping the team validate its research, and we are especially grateful to them: Bab Coker (Roger Mills County Treasurer), Cassie Springer (Roger Mills County Deputy Treasurer), Julie Louthan (Dewey County Assessor), Kelly Taylor (Deputy Assessor, Beckham County), Lynette Ingraham (Harper County Assessor), Sonya Coleman (Woodward County Treasurer), Janet Roulet (Custer County Treasurer), Rhonda Brantley (Comanche County Treasurer), and Stan Jennings (Caddo County Treasurer). A mapping project of the scope and detail required for the research presented in Section 3 had never been attempted for Oklahoma (and, based on research to date, anywhere else), and the results achieved required hundreds of man-hours in pain-staking, detailed work. Mr. Joshua Conaway, Ms. Paige Harjo, and Mr. Brian Highfill completed what at first seemed an insurmountable task, and did so with exceptional precision and speed. In so doing, they also created a resource that will provide value to Oklahomans for years to come. Additional thanks are also owed to Mr. Conaway who contributed to the economic analysis of land use trade-offs included in Section 3 of this report. Finally, Dr. Shelly Peper Sitton very graciously provided valuable editorial and layout support for this report. Funding The State Chamber of Oklahoma Research Foundation funded this project through a research contract. Author’s Note Data for Figures 2 and 3 appearing on page 9 are current as of June 30, 2015. All other data contained in this report reflect the most current publicly available information as of May 1, 2015. 2 Contents Figures ............................................................................4 Executive Summary .. .5 Section 1: Oklahoma’s Wind Energy Industry .............................................7 1.1 The History of Oklahoma’s Wind Energy Industry .............................7 1.2 Oklahoma’s Wind Energy Industry Today ....................................8 1.3 The Future of Oklahoma Wind Energy .....................................11 Section 2: Wind Energy’s Contributions to Ad Valorem Revenues ............................13 2.1 Oklahoma’s Ad Valorem Tax System ........................................13 2.2 Wind Energy’s Contribution to Oklahoma Ad Valorem Revenues .................14 2.2.1 Historical Payments to Counties .....................................14 2.2.2 Forecast Payments to Counties ......................................16 2.3 The Oklahoma Qualifying Manufacturing Concern Exemption and Exempt Manufacturing Reimbursement Program ....................................20 2.3.1 Forecast Reimbursement Fund Obligations for the Wind Industry . .22 2.3.2 Assessment Methodologies for Oklahoma Counties ......................24 2.4 Conclusions and Recommendations Regarding Ad Valorem Issues ................24 Section 3: Spatial Issues and Land Use in Oklahoma’s Wind Energy Industry ...................24 3.1 Mapping Methodology ..................................................25 3.2 Summary of Spatial and Land Use Findings ..................................25 3.3 Spacing, Compatibility of Land Uses, and Setback Issues ........................27 3.3.1 Wind Energy and Agricultural Land Uses .............................27 3.3.2 Wind Energy and Petroleum Development .............................31 3.3.3 Setback Issues ...................................................33 3.5 Conclusions Regarding Spatial Issues and Land Use ...........................35 Section 4: Wind Energy’s Impacts to Oklahoma Utility Ratepayers ............................35 Section 5: Conclusions ..............................................................35 Appendix: Research Methodology .....................................................37 3 Figures Figure 1: Oklahoma Installed Wind Energy Capacity, 2002 - 2015 ............................8 Figure 2: Oklahoma Wind Energy Projects ..............................................9 Figure 3: Summary of Oklahoma Wind Energy Projects ....................................9 Figure 4: Oklahoma Electrical Power Production by Source, January 2015 .....................10 Figure 5: Oklahoma Wind Power Production ...........................................11 Figure 6: SPP Priority Projects Map ...................................................12 Figure 7: Proposed Route of Plains & Eastern Clean Line HVDC Transmission Project . .13 Figure 8: Historic Ad Valorem Revenues and Property Values for Wind Energy Systems, 2004-2014 .........................................15 Figure 9: Acre Equivalencies for Average Wind Turbine Ad Valorem Revenues .................16 Figure 10: Total Historic and Forecast Ad Valorem Revenues ................................17 Figure 11: Historical and Forecast Ad Valorem Revenues from Wind Energy Systems, by County and Source ...............................18 Figure 12: Location of Existing Oklahoma Wind Energy Projects Relative to Population Loss or Below Non-Metropolitan County Average Population Gains . .18 Figure 13: Total Education Revenues from Wind Energy Systems ............................19 Figure 14: Composition of School Funds Paid over Forecast Model, 2003 – 2043 ................20 Figure 15: OTC Ad Valorem Reimbursements by Industry Sector, 2004-2013 ...................22 Figure 16: Total Historical and Forecast OTC Ad Valorem Reimbursements ....................23 Figure 17: Combined Historical and Forecast Ad Valorem Tax Payments by Source ...............23 Figure 18: Examples of Project Elements ................................................25 Figure 19: Summary of Wind Energy Project Land Use ....................................26 Figure 20: Equivalent Area of All Oklahoma Wind Energy Projects ...........................27 Figure 21: KODE Novus I Project – Wind, Irrigated Agriculture, and Intensive Animal Production ........................................................28 Figure 22: Blackwell Wind Farm Road Configuration ......................................29 Figure 23: Increases in Per-Acre Revenues to Agricultural Land from Wind Energy Systems . .30 Figure 24: Examples of Cattle and Wind Turbines ........................................31 Figure 25: KODE Novus I Project, Wind and Petroleum Development ........................32 Figure 26: Setback Radii to Avoid Collision in Event of Mutual Derrick and Turbine Collapse . .33 Figure 27: Distance of Existing Wind Energy Projects from Nearest Hospital, Airport, and School ...............................................................34 Figure 28: Map of Radii from Hospitals, Airports and Schools to Nearest Wind Turbine . .34 Figure 29: Oklahoma Tax Commission Depreciation Schedule ...............................40 Figure 30: OTC Cost Approach Model Asset Value .......................................41 Figure 31: Ad Valorem Revenue Collections by System Life Year, Cost Approach Model, Prototype Turbine ......................................42 4 Executive Summary ◊ In the past 12 years, Oklahoma has grown from having no utility-scale wind energy capacity to now having nearly 4,000 megawatts of capacity, making it the fourth-largest wind energy state in the United States. With projects currently under construction, Oklahoma is projected to have more than 5,000 megawatts of capacity by the end of 2015. Possessing one of the nation’s largest wind resource potentials and an increasingly robust electrical transmission grid,
Recommended publications
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File
    SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States https://marketpublishers.com/r/AC4983D1366EN.html Date: June 2012 Pages: 700 Price: US$ 450.00 (Single User License) ID: AC4983D1366EN Abstracts The global energy industry has explored many options to meet the growing energy needs of industrialized economies wherein production demands are to be met with supply of power from varied energy resources worldwide. There has been a clearer realization of the finite nature of oil resources and the ever higher pushing demand for energy. The world has yet to stabilize on the complex geopolitical undercurrents which influence the oil and gas production as well as supply strategies globally. Aruvian's R'search’s report – Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States - analyzes the scope of American energy production from varied traditional sources as well as the developing renewable energy sources. In view of understanding energy transactions, the report also studies the revenue returns for investors in various energy channels which manifest themselves in American energy demand and supply dynamics. In depth view has been provided in this report of US oil, electricity, natural gas, nuclear power, coal, wind, and hydroelectric sectors. The various geopolitical interests and intentions governing the exploitation, production, trade and supply of these resources for energy production has also been analyzed by this report in a non-partisan manner. The report starts with a descriptive base analysis of the characteristics of the global energy industry in terms of economic quantity of demand. The drivers of demand and the traditional resources which are used to fulfill this demand are explained along with the emerging mandate of nuclear energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary
    Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2007, there were more than 11,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 4,000 MW projected in both 2007 and 2008. The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) estimates that the U.S. installed capacity will exceed 16,000 MW by the end of 2007. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Seventeen states now have more than 100 MW installed. We anticipate five to six additional states will join the 100-MW club early in 2008, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. WPA continues to work with its national, regional, and state partners to communicate the opportunities and benefits of wind energy to a diverse set of stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Suzlon Signs Binding Agreement with Centerbridge Partners LP for 100% Sale of Senvion SE
    For Immediate Release 22 January 2015 Suzlon signs binding agreement with Centerbridge Partners LP for 100% sale of Senvion SE Equity value of EUR 1 Billion (approx Rs. 7200 Crs) for 100% stake sale in an all cash deal and Earn Out of EUR 50 Million (approx Rs. 360 Crs) Senvion to give licence to Suzlon for off-shore technology for the Indian market Suzlon to give license to Senvion for S111- 2.1 MW technology for USA market Sale Proceeds to be utilised towards debt reduction and business growth in the key markets like India, USA and other Emerging markets Pune, India: Suzlon Group today signed a binding agreement with Centerbridge Partners LP, USA to sell 100% stake in Senvion SE, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Suzlon Group. The deal is valued at EUR 1 billion (approx Rs. 7200 Crs) equity value in an all cash transaction and future earn out of upto an additional EUR 50 million (approx Rs 360crs). The transaction is subject to Regulatory and other customary closing conditions. Senvion to give Suzlon license for off-shore technologies for the Indian market. Suzlon to give Senvion the S111-2.1 MW license for the USA market. The 100% stake sale of Senvion SE is in line with Suzlon‘s strategy to reduce the debt and focus on the home market and high growth market like USA and emerging markets like China, Brazil, South Africa, Turkey and Mexico. The transaction is expected to be closed before the end of the current financial year. Mr Tulsi Tanti, Chairman, Suzlon Group said, “We are pleased to announce this development which is in line with our strategic initiative to strengthen our Balance Sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of International Experience with Policies to Promote Wind Power Industry Development
    A Review of International Experience with Policies to Promote Wind Power Industry Development FINAL REPORT Prepared by: Joanna Lewis, Consultant to the Center for Resource Solutions Ryan Wiser, Consultant to the Center for Resource Solutions Prepared for: Energy Foundation China Sustainable Energy Program March 10, 2005 Table of Contents Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................... 9 2. Strategies for Localization ................................................................................................. 11 2.1. Models for wind turbine manufacturing ........................................................................ 11 2.2. Models for technology acquisition: purchasing versus internal development............... 11 2.3. Incentives for technology transfers................................................................................ 12 2.4. Implications.................................................................................................................... 12 3. Potential Benefits of Localization...................................................................................... 14 3.1. Domestic economic development and employment ...................................................... 14 3.2. International exports.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Generation of AEP Boost. Senvion Turbine Control Upgrade 2.0
    The next generation of AEP boost. Senvion Turbine Control Upgrade 2.0. Five high-performance features increasing on average 1.8% AEP. Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Service is continuously developing a series of performance enhancing hardware and software technologies to help producers achieve even greater gains for their Senvion wind turbines. The new Turbine Control Upgrade 2.0 offers greater performance by increasing the Annual Energy Production (AEP) of the Senvion wind turbines by 1.8% on average*. This is possible due to further optimization of two proven features provided within the previous version of the Turbine Control Upgrade and the addition of three newly developed features. Based on the analysis of operational data, Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Service is able to deliver control algorithm solutions to provide yield gains. The Turbine Control Upgrade 2.0 is a bundle of performance-enhancing software products, derived from our data analysis activities. It has the following optimized and newly added features: n Smart Start n Dynamic Yaw n Adaptive Rotor Speed n Parameter Tuning n Soft Cut-Out The combination of these five high-performance features can increase the AEP of your wind farm by 1.8% on average*. New features and greater performance. The ‘Smart Start’ feature applies a self-learning algorithm which optimizes the Benefits of Senvion Turbine start-up procedure of the wind turbine to increase the energy production in the lower Control Upgrade 2.0: partial load area. The algorithm is lowering the start-up wind speed in small steps n Particularly effective for after each successful start of the turbine.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc
    Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) Database This page intentionally left blank. Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc (West) Database Appendix D APPENDIX D. AVIAN FATALITY STUDIES IN THE WESTERN ECOSYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. (WEST) DATABASE Alite, CA (09-10) Chatfield et al. 2010 Alta Wind I, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta Wind I-V, CA (13-14) Chatfield et al. 2014 Alta Wind II-V, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta VIII, CA (12-13) Chatfield and Bay 2014 Barton I & II, IA (10-11) Derby et al. 2011a Barton Chapel, TX (09-10) WEST 2011 Beech Ridge, WV (12) Tidhar et al. 2013 Beech Ridge, WV (13) Young et al. 2014a Big Blue, MN (13) Fagen Engineering 2014 Big Blue, MN (14) Fagen Engineering 2015 Big Horn, WA (06-07) Kronner et al. 2008 Big Smile, OK (12-13) Derby et al. 2013b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 08) Jeffrey et al. 2009a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 09) Enk et al. 2010 Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 09-10) Enk et al. 2011a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase III; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012a Blue Sky Green Field, WI (08; 09) Gruver et al. 2009 Buffalo Gap I, TX (06) Tierney 2007 Buffalo Gap II, TX (07-08) Tierney 2009 Buffalo Mountain, TN (00-03) Nicholson et al. 2005 Buffalo Mountain, TN (05) Fiedler et al. 2007 Buffalo Ridge, MN (Phase I; 96) Johnson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • “PROSPECTS for OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY” a Report Written For
    “PROSPECTS FOR OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY” A report written for the EU (Altener contract XVII/4.1030/Z/98-395) by The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA). Views or opinions contained within the report are not necessarily those of BWEA, EWEA or the Commission. Permission to reproduce any part of this document must be gained in writing from BWEA. Comments on the paper are welcomed by email to [email protected] 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Of all renewable energy technologies, offshore wind energy has possibly the most favourable combination of the key attributes of resource, energy cost and risk. The European offshore wind resource is extremely large, energy costs are cheaper than those of many other renewable technologies (but more expensive than onshore wind), and the risks are low, as the technology has already entered the demonstration phase. Studies of offshore wind energy have been in progress for around 20 years. As a result the key issues associated with the resource, the offshore environment and the necessary adaptations of wind turbine technology are all well understood. Early studies focused on the use of MW size wind turbines, frequently in large arrays, whereas early demonstration wind farms used modest numbers of specially adapted versions of commercial machines around the 500 kW mark. Although these have operated successfully and some have delivered energy in excess of expectations, they are mostly installed in relatively sheltered waters. The conditions in some of the windier regions, for example the North Sea, will be more hostile. Several studies of European resources have confirmed that most states have accessible offshore wind energy resources equal to at least 20 % of current consumption, and most have considerably more.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Turbines
    thyssenkrupp rothe erde USA Inc. dba ROTEK Incorporated Wind 1400 South Chillicothe Road Aftermarket Aurora, OH 44202 Tel: 330.562.4000 rothe erde slewing bearings Fax: 330.562.4620 rothe erde rings psl rolling bearings Authorized distributor for rothe erde @ slewing bearings for the Wind Aftermarket rothe erde @ slewing bearings for the Wind Aftermarket rothe erde @ slewing bearings for the Wind Aftermarket This is us Upgrades Standard Upgrades Through Operational Excellence thyssenkrupp Specifically the Wind Energy Market has been driving significant continuous improvement measures over the last 10 years. All of our bearing products are manufactured according to the latest state of the art technology: rothe erde • Cleanliness requirements in forged rings • Inspection services and failure analysis • Improved quality in rolling elements thyssenkrupp rothe erde with its global presence is developing and • Improved ultrasonic and other non-destructive delivering specific bearings to the wind industry since the first turbine has testing methods and frequencies been built in the 80's. In North America we have been supplying these • Process improvements products under the Rotek brand name. Rotek, now thyssenkrupp rothe erde • Validation in world’s largest R&D facility for blade bearings USA Inc. continues to be your partner for the wind aftermarket slewing • World’s longest track record for blade bearings within the bearings and will supply slewing bearing products under the globally Service and aligned brand name rothe erde. sentire wind
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Conservation Plan for the Goodnoe Hills Wind Facility Klickitat County, Washington
    EAGLE CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE GOODNOE HILLS WIND FACILITY KLICKITAT COUNTY, WASHINGTON Prepared for: PacifiCorp 825 NW Multnomah Boulevard. Portland, Oregon 97232 Prepared by: Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 415 West 17th Street, Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 December 9, 2019 Confidential Business Information Goodnoe Hills Wind Facility Eagle Conservation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Corporate Policy ......................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................... 6 1.3 Project Coordination with Resource Agencies ............................................................ 7 2 SITE SUITABILITY, PRE- AND POST-CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS ............................ 9 2.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Site Suitability ............................................................................................................11 2.3 Pre-Construction Surveys ..........................................................................................12 2.3.1 Fixed-point Avian Use Surveys ..............................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy and Economic Recovery in Europe How Wind Energy Will Put Communities at the Heart of the Green Recovery
    Wind energy and economic recovery in Europe How wind energy will put communities at the heart of the green recovery Wind energy and economic recovery in Europe How wind energy will put communities at the heart of the green recovery October 2020 windeurope.org Wind energy and economic recovery in Europe: How wind energy will put communities at the heart of the green recovery WindEurope These materials, including any updates to them, are The socio-economic impact evaluation of wind energy on published by and remain subject to the copy right of the European Union has been carried out using the SNA93 the Wood Mackenzie group ("Wood Mackenzie"), its methodology (System of National Accounts adopted in licensors and any other third party as applicable and are 1993 by the United Nations Statistical Commission) and made available to WindEurope (“Client”) and its Affiliates Deloitte’s approaches, which evaluate the effects of the under terms agreed between Wood Mackenzie and Client. renewable energy in the economy. The use of these materials is governed by the terms and conditions of the agreement under which they were Deloitte has provided WindEurope solely with the services provided. The content and conclusions contained are and estimations defined in the proposal signed by confidential and may not be disclosed to any other person WindEurope and Deloitte on March 13th, 2020. Deloitte without Wood Mackenzie's prior written permission. accepts no responsibility or liability towards any third The data and information provided by Wood Mackenzie party that would have access to the present document should not be interpreted as advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 02 Generation Assets 04 About Meridian 16 Performance Summary 22 Segment Performance 33 Sustainability 34 People and Health & Safety 36 Environment 38 Community 39 Governance 44 Financial Statements 106 Statutory Information REPORT FOR YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT FOR YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 OUR PERFORMANCE FINANCIAL FINANCIAL GENERATION HEALTH & SAFETY 28% 13% 19% 50% Reduction in EBITDAF1 Reduction in net Reduction in Improvement in from last year cash flow from generation production lost-time injury IMPACTED BY LOWEST LEVEL OF operating activities OWING TO THE SALE OF THE frequency rate INFLOWS IN 79 yEARS OF RECORDS SINCe 30 JUNe 2011 TEKAPO HYDRO POWER SINCe 30 JUNe 2011 AND THE SALE OF THE TEKAPO STATIONS2 AND CHALLEngIng HYDRO POWER STATIONS2 HYDROLOGY CONDITIONS RETAIL CUSTOMERS EMPLOYEES $5.90 5% 3.4% Per contracted MWh Growth in retail Improvement in customer connections employee engagement IMPROVEMENT IN UNDERLYING3 PROFITABILITY OF OUR RETAIL (installation control SINCe 30 JUNe 2011 SEGMENT SINCe 30 JUNe 2011 points – ICPs) SINCe 30 JUNe 2011 PLANT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT 0.14 % 420MW 60MW Hydro forced Macarthur wind farm Mill Creek wind farm outage factor CONSTRUCTION IN VICTORIA, BEGAN CONSTRUCTION LOWEST IN 20 yEARS OF RECORDS AUSTRALIA, IS PROGRESSIng IN JULY 2012 TO PLAN 1 Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, change in fair value of financial instruments, impairments, gain/(loss) on sale of assets and joint venture equity accounted earnings. 2 Sold to Genesis Energy on 1 June 2011. 3 Removing the variability of electricity purchase prices and replacing with a fixed input price of $85/MWh.
    [Show full text]