DOCSLIB.ORG

PE659.058V01-00

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development AGRI_PV(2020)0921_1 MINUTES Meeting of 21 September 2020, 16.45-19.45 and 22 September 2020, 9.00-11.00 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 16.52 on Monday, 21 September 2020, with Norbert Lins (Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda AGRI_OJ(2020)0921_1 Decision: The draft agenda was adopted. 2. Chair’s announcements Interpretation was available in FR, DE, IT, EN, ES, CS, LT, PL and RO. *** Remote voting procedure*** Opening of the remote voting procedure Voting will be opened at 16.55 and will be closed at 19.15 All Members taking part in the vote (either present in committee meeting room or via remote participation) will vote via application iVote 3. Equivalence of field inspections carried out in Ukraine on cereal seed-producing crops and on the equivalence of cereal seed produced in Ukraine AGRI/9/02780 Rapporteur: Veronika Vrecionová (ECR) PV\1216373EN.docx PE659.058v01-00 EN United in diversityEN Adoption of amendments Decision: The presented amendments were rejected Speakers: Jérémy Decerle, Bronis Ropė, Ivan David, Veronika Vrecionová 4. General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 - all sections AGRI/9/03258 2020/1998(BUD) 11072/1/2020 – C9-0314/2020 Rapporteur for the opinion: Petri Sarvamaa (PPE) AD – PE653.892v02-00 AM – PE655.968v01-00 AB – PE657.500v01-00 Responsible: BUDG – Pierre Larrouturou (S&D) PR – PE658.989v01-00 Olivier Chastel (Renew) DT – PE657.417v01-00 Adoption of amendments Decision: 37 adopted amendments; 79 presented 5. An EU legal framework to halt and reverse EU-driven global deforestation AGRI/9/02245 2020/2006(INL) Rapporteur for the opinion: Martin Häusling (Verts/ALE) AD – PE650.488v02-00 AM – PE652.511v01-00 Responsible: ENVI* – Delara Burkhardt (S&D) AM – PE655.680v01-00 Adoption of amendments Decision: 19 adopted amendments; 135 presented 6. A new strategy for European SMEs AGRI/9/03117 2020/2131(INI) Rapporteur for the opinion: Pina Picierno (S&D) AD – PE652.568v02-00 AM – PE653.966v01-00 Responsible: ITRE – Paolo Borchia (ID) PR – PE653.858v01-00 AM – PE657.190v01-00 Adoption of amendments Decision: 45 adopted amendments; 86 presented 7. A European strategy for data AGRI/9/03118 PE659.058v01-00 2/19 PV\1216373EN.docx EN 2020/2217(INI) Rapporteur for the opinion: Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez (PPE) PA – PE652.570v01-00 AM – PE653.991v01-00 Responsible: ITRE* – Miapetra Kumpula-Natri PR – PE657.163v03-00 (S&D) Opinions: INTA EMPL ENVI IMCO* Christel Schaldemose (S&D) TRAN* Roman Haider (ID) PA – PE652.598v01-00 AGRI CULT JURI* LIBE* FEMM Adoption of amendments Decision: 12 adopted amendments; 88 presented *** End of remote voting procedure *** 8. Exchange of views on the Recovery Package and revised MFF Speakers: Norbert Lins, Paolo De Castro, Anne Sander, Martin Hlaváček, Elena Lizzi, Bronis Ropė, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Manuel Bompard, Benoît Lutgen, Clara Aguilera, Ulrike Müller, Balázs Hidvéghi, Pina Picierno, Mara Bizzotto, Claude Gruffat, Simone Schmiedtbauer, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, Elsi Katainen, Isabel Carvalhais, Dino Giarrusso, Michael Niejahr (DG AGRI) 9. Exchange of views with Ruben Tascon, Acting Director for Health and Food Audits and Analysis, DG SANTE Speakers: Norbert Lins, Ruben Tascon (DG SANTE), Herbert Dorfmann, Paolo De Castro, Ulrike Müller, Ivan David, Martin Häusling, Mazaly Aguilar, Luke Ming Flanagan, Daniel Buda, Juozas Olekas, Irène Tolleret, Anne Sander, Gilles Lebreton, Francisco Guerreiro The meeting adjourned at 18.30 and resumed at 9.07 on Tuesday, 22 September 2020, with Norbert Lins (Chair) presiding. * * * 10. Chair’s announcements Interpretation was available in FR, DE, IT, EN, CS and PL. Announcement of the results of the vote. PV\1216373EN.docx 3/19 PE659.058v01-00 EN Opening of the remote voting procedure on the final votes on the report and the opinions as amended All Members taking part in the votes (either present in committee meeting room or via remote participation) will vote via application iVote Voting will be opened at 9.15 and will be closed at 11.30 Speakers: Marc Tarabella *** Remote voting procedure*** 11. Equivalence of field inspections carried out in Ukraine on cereal seed-producing crops and on the equivalence of cereal seed produced in Ukraine AGRI/9/02780 Rapporteur: Veronika Vrecionová (ECR) Adoption of draft report Decision: Adopted.: 31 votes to 12, with 5 abstentions 12. General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 - all sections AGRI/9/03258 2020/1998(BUD) 11072/1/2020 – C9-0314/2020 Rapporteur for the opinion: Petri Sarvamaa (PPE) AD – PE653.892v02-00 AM – PE655.968v01-00 AB – PE657.500v01-00 Responsible: BUDG – Pierre Larrouturou (S&D) PR – PE658.989v01-00 Olivier Chastel (Renew) DT – PE657.417v01-00 Adoption of draft opinion Decision: Adopted.: 43 votes to 5, with 0 abstentions 13. An EU legal framework to halt and reverse EU-driven global deforestation AGRI/9/02245 2020/2006(INL) Rapporteur for the opinion: Martin Häusling (Verts/ALE) AD – PE650.488v02-00 AM – PE652.511v01-00 Responsible: ENVI* – Delara Burkhardt (S&D) AM – PE655.680v01-00 Adoption of draft opinion Decision: Adopted.: 38 votes to 1, with 9 abstentions 14. A new strategy for European SMEs AGRI/9/03117 PE659.058v01-00 4/19 PV\1216373EN.docx EN 2020/2131(INI) Rapporteur for the opinion: Pina Picierno (S&D) AD – PE652.568v02-00 AM – PE653.966v01-00 Responsible: ITRE – Paolo Borchia (ID) PR – PE653.858v01-00 AM – PE657.190v01-00 Adoption of draft opinion Decision: Adopted.: 44 votes to 1, with 2 abstentions 15. A European strategy for data AGRI/9/03118 2020/2217(INI) Rapporteur for the opinion: Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez (PPE) PA – PE652.570v01-00 AM – PE653.991v01-00 Responsible: ITRE* – Miapetra Kumpula-Natri PR – PE657.163v03-00 (S&D) Opinions: INTA EMPL ENVI IMCO* Christel Schaldemose (S&D) TRAN* Roman Haider (ID) PA – PE652.598v01-00 AGRI CULT JURI* LIBE* FEMM Adoption of draft opinion Decision: Adopted.: 37 votes to 5, with 5 abstentions *** End of remote voting procedure *** 16. Any other business None. 17. Next meetings 12 October 2020, 16.45 – 18.45 (Brussels) * * * The meeting closed at 9.14 and was followed by a meeting of Coordinators in closed session. PV\1216373EN.docx 5/19 PE659.058v01-00 EN * * * 22 September 2020, 9.15 – 11.00 (in camera) 18. Coordinators’ meeting The coordinators met in camera. Their decisions were approved by the Committee on 22 September 2020. 1. EXCHANGE OF VIEWS WITH RAPPORTEURS CONCERNING THE CAP LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS - STATE OF PLAY & NEXT STEPS Outcome: SP - the work is progressing to find compromise amendments on the main issues. CMO / FMM - the major compromise amendments are on the table, the discussions are progressing at political level. The Rapporteurs are optimistic about reaching a majority on compromises in due time. The issue will be settled at plenary in case some compromises can’t be reached. Coordinators confirmed the vote in plenary in October II. 2. ATTRIBUTION OF OPINIONS 2.1 2019 discharge to the Commission - COM(2020) 289 final - 2020/2140(DEC) Decision: The opinion is allocated to EPP for 1 point. 3. REQUESTS FOR ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN UPCOMING COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDAS 3.1. ECA SR 13/2020: Biodiversity on farmland: CAP contribution has not halted the decline Decision: The Chair will check the possibility of having a joint presentation with CONT on 15 October; alternatively AGRI will invite the responsible ECA Member for an exchange of views on this Special Report at a future ComAGRI meeting. 4. MISCELLANEOUS DECISIONS 4.1. Recovery Package Decision: Coordinators endorsed the option B.3, with the draft document to be presented in EN and a tight calendar; The rapporteur will circulate the draft document asap; the vote in ComAGRI would be planned for mid- October. In any case Coordinators confirmed that the Transitional measures Regulation is to be voted in AGRI no later than 1 December 2020. PE659.058v01-00 6/19 PV\1216373EN.docx EN 4.2. Commission Proposal on amending Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on organic production COM(2020) 483 final - 2020/0231 (COD) Decision: The Coordinators decided on the urgent procedure for the act concerned, and mandated the Chair to request it to the President of the Parliament. 4.3. Withdrawal by the Commission of the two proposals relating to the cloning of animals Decision: Coordinators decided that AGRI should express its political disagreement to the withdrawal of the proposals in the form of a letter, in coordination with ENVI. 4.4. Proposals for Council decisions on the conclusion of agreements between the EU and, respectively, Norway and Cuba on the apportionment of tariff-rate quotas following Brexit Decision: Coordinators decided that AGRI will give its consent to the conclusion of the agreements between the EU and, respectively, Norway and Cuba, in the form of a letter to INTA’s Chair. 4.5. Interpretation regime during ComAGRI meetings Decision: The Chair expressed concerns as regards the AGRI interpretation needs to the Secretary-General. He invited Coordinators to pass on the message as well at the level of their groups. 4.6. Appointment of a new rapporteur for Brexit Decision: The item is postponed to the next Coordinators’ meeting. 5. PETITIONS 5.1. Petition No 0280/2019 by J.B. (Spanish) on the situation of Valencian orange growers Decision: The draft opinion on the above-mentioned petition has been approved. 6. OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR INFORMATION Decision: No action with respect to any of the documents included in Annex I. 7. FOR INFORMATION 7.1. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Technical Support Instrument - COM(2020)409 – 2020/0103 (COD) BUDG and ECON are the main committees for this Codecision procedure, and will be soon voting the joint report.
Recommended publications
  • Letter to the Commission Regarding Printers Voluntary Agreement

    Letter to the Commission Regarding Printers Voluntary Agreement

    Brussels, Wednesday 26th of May To: Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius, European Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries Mr Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for the Internal Market Mr Frans Timmermans, European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal We urge the European Commission to keep its promises and propose a regulatory measure addressing the durability and repairability of printers as well as the reusability of cartridges as part of the forthcoming Circular Electronics Initiative. And we ask that the Commission rejects the proposed voluntary agreement drafted by manufacturers. The Commission's flagship Circular Economy Action Plan, adopted in March 2020, has set out to address the entire life cycle of products and tackle their premature obsolescence notably by promoting the right to repair for ICT products. In addition to mobile phones, laptops and tablets, the Plan has rightfully identified printers as a particularly wasteful product category, and has included a commitment to tackle them by means of a dedicated regulatory instrument “unless the sector reaches an ambitious voluntary agreement” by September 2020. Nearly one year later, the discussions on the voluntary agreement have not yielded any tangible results. Voluntary approaches clearly do not work. We need strong regulatory action now. We are extremely concerned by this situation. Not only because of the negative impacts of short-lived printers on the environment and on consumers but also because we are witnessing promises made being walked back on. Printers are one of the most iconic examples of premature obsolescence. Our analysis of printers in use today suggests that over 80% of them have been in use for less than 3 years, and only about 4% have been in use for 5 years or longer.
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels

    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels

    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
  • We Need a European Response to Fight Against the Consequences of the COVID-19

    We Need a European Response to Fight Against the Consequences of the COVID-19

    © Photo European Parliament en Publication | 16.03.2020 We need a European response to fight against the consequences of the COVID-19 Open letter to the Eurogroup Dear members of the Eurogroup, The Coronavirus pandemic has created a state of emergency in Europe, which needs a coordinated and ambitious response. According to the latest forecast by the European Commission, the European economy is expected to rapidly fall into recession that may be extremely severe if the policy response is not appropriate. There is no time to waste if we want avoid a repeating the mistakes made in the context global financial and subsequent euro area crises. The EU economy never fully recovered from the previous meltdown and was already in a weak position to meet the current challenges. A certain number of required targeted measures have already been announced by the European Central Bank, the Commission and several Member States to mitigate the economic impact of the outbreak. The ECB decided to increment its substantial monetary policy stimulus already in place. The Commission will implement the flexibilities foreseen in the Stability and Growth Pact and reorient unspent EU funds. Most Member States are in the process of adopting policies providing financial support and tax deferrals to companies. Moreover,the Single Supervisory Mechanism with the support of the European Banking Authority will provide temporary capital and operational relief to the banks. It is also worrying that instead of integrating economic shocks such as an epidemic outbreak in banking stress, such tests are postponed sine die. Having all these considerations in mind and recognising that the already announced measures represent steps in the good direction, the response cannot simply be based on policies adopted by Member States with supportive measures at the EU level, even if these are meaningful.
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
  • Urgent Call for Action: Making Use of the Conference on the Future of Europe for Reforming Or Abolishing the EURATOM Treaty

    Urgent Call for Action: Making Use of the Conference on the Future of Europe for Reforming Or Abolishing the EURATOM Treaty

    Urgent call for action: Making use of the Conference on the Future of Europe for reforming or abolishing the EURATOM Treaty Brussels, 6 October 2020 Dear Mrs. President of the EU Commission von der Leyen, Dear Mr. President of the European Council Michel, In your application speech for your current position held on 16 July 2019, you have passionately advocated a united, fair and equal Europe that is developing strong and ambitious solutions to the climate crisis. We welcome the commitment and energy you are putting into the implementation of the Green Deal. In order to achieve a carbon-neutral European Union until 2050 with a clean, resource efficient and competitive economy, you are focusing on fair and inclusive transitions for everyone. One of the main European Treaties, the EURATOM-Treaty, diametrically opposes your efforts. On 25 March 1957, the treaty for establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) was signed in Rome - at the same time as the treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC). The "Roman Treaties" are the foundation of today's European Union. While the EEC-Treaty has been reformed several times (EEC - EC - TFEU-Treaty), the EURATOM-Treaty has remained unchanged since 1957. Its main aim is the development of a powerful European nuclear industry. Nuclear energy "represents an essential resource for the development and invigoration of industry and will permit the advancement of the cause of peace" - up to this day. This also applies to 14 member states that have never operated nuclear power plants or that have decided to phase out nuclear energy as well as to those that reject the technology constitutionally.
  • WQ3 Mass Arrests of LGBTI Activists in Poland .Pdf

    WQ3 Mass Arrests of LGBTI Activists in Poland .Pdf

    Question for written answer E-004735/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Pierre Karleskind (Renew), Sophia in 't Veld (Renew), Fredrick Federley (Renew), Karen Melchior (Renew), Nicolae Ştefănuță (Renew), Moritz Körner (Renew), Maite Pagazaurtundúa (Renew), Samira Rafaela (Renew), Radka Maxová (Renew), Liesje Schreinemacher (Renew), Abir Al-Sahlani (Renew), Anna Júlia Donáth (Renew), Irène Tolleret (Renew), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Tanja Fajon (S&D), Anne-Sophie Pelletier (GUE/NGL), Isabel Carvalhais (S&D), Monika Vana (Verts/ALE), Cornelia Ernst (GUE/NGL), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Gabriele Bischoff (S&D), Delara Burkhardt (S&D), Miapetra Kumpula-Natri (S&D), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Grace O'Sullivan (Verts/ALE), Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield (Verts/ALE), Eleonora Evi (NI), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Maria Arena (S&D), Francisco Guerreiro (Verts/ALE), Arba Kokalari (PPE), Pascal Durand (Renew), Nathalie Loiseau (Renew), Catherine Chabaud (Renew), Ilana Cicurel (Renew), Evelyne Gebhardt (S&D), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Mauri Pekkarinen (Renew), Billy Kelleher (Renew), Andrus Ansip (Renew), Irena Joveva (Renew), Sandro Gozi (Renew), Asger Christensen (Renew), Martin Hojsík (Renew), María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Stéphane Bijoux (Renew), José Ramón Bauzá Díaz (Renew), Stéphane Séjourné (Renew), Svenja Hahn (Renew), Marianne Vind (S&D), Katalin Cseh (Renew), Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (Renew), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marie-Pierre Vedrenne (Renew), Henna Virkkunen (PPE), Jan- Christoph Oetjen (Renew), Claudia Gamon (Renew), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Birgit Sippel (S&D), Ramona Strugariu (Renew), Isabel Santos (S&D), Valérie Hayer (Renew), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Maria Walsh (PPE), Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D), Linea Søgaard-Lidell (Renew), Mario Furore (NI), Clara Aguilera (S&D), Alice Kuhnke (Verts/ALE), Pär Holmgren (Verts/ALE), Jakop G.
  • Greens/EFA Group - Distribution of Seats in EP Parliamentary Committees

    Greens/EFA Group - Distribution of Seats in EP Parliamentary Committees

    Seats in Committees Update 04.02.2021 Greens/EFA group - Distribution of Seats in EP Parliamentary Committees Parliamentary Committees Seats FULL Members SUBSTITUTE Members Foreign Affairs (AFET) Marketa GREGOROVÁ Alviina ALAMETSÄ Pierrette HERZBERGER- Reinhard BÜTIKOFER FOFANA Viola VON CRAMON Sergey LAGODINSKY 7 Jordi SOLE Katrin LANGENSIEPEN Tineke STRIK Hannah NEUMANN Thomas WAITZ Mounir SATOURI Salima YENBOU Ernest URTASUN Agriculture (AGRI) Claude GRUFFAT Benoit BITEAU 5 Anna DEPARNAY- Francisco GUERREIRO GRUNENBERG Martin HÄUSLING Pär HOLMGREN Bronis ROPĖ Tilly METZ Sarah WIENER Thomas WAITZ Budgets (BUDG) Rasmus ANDRESEN Damien BOESELAGER 4 David CORMAND Henrike HAHN Alexandra GEESE Monika VANA Francisco GUERREIRO Vacant Culture & Education (CULT) Romeo FRANZ Marcel KOLAJA 3 Niklas NIENASS Diana RIBA Salima YENBOU Vacant Development (DEVE) Pierrette HERZBERGER- Alviina ALAMETSÄ FOFANA Benoit BITEAU 3 Erik MARQUARDT Caroline ROOSE Michelle RIVASI Economic & Monetary Affairs Sven GIEGOLD Damien CARÊME (ECON) Claude GRUFFAT Karima DELLI Stasys JAKELIŪNAS Bas EICKHOUT 7 Philippe LAMBERTS Henrike HAHN Kira PETER-HANSEN Ville NIINISTÖ Ernest URTASUN Mikulas PEKSA Piernicola PEDICINI Vacant Committee seats - UPDATE 30.9.20 Employment & Social Affairs Kira PETER-HANSEN Romeo FRANZ 4 (EMPL) Katrin LANGENSIEPEN Terry REINTKE Mounir SATOURI Kim VAN SPARRENTAK Tatjana ŽDANOKA Sara MATTHIEU Environment, Public Health & Margarete AUKEN Michael BLOSS Food safety (ENVI) Bas EICKHOUT Manuela RIPA Pär HOLMGREN Sven GIEGOLD Yannick JADOT Martin HÄUSLING
  • Brussels, 24 February 2021

    Brussels, 24 February 2021

    Brussels, 24 February 2021 Declaration from Members of the European Parliament to urge the Commission and Member States not to block the TRIPS waiver at the WTO and to support global access to COVID-19 vaccines We, Members of the European Parliament, urge the European Commission and the European Council to review their opposition to the TRIPS waiver proposal at the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which serves to enable greater access to affordable COVID-19 health technologies, including vaccines, in particular for developing and middle income countries. This call comes in view of the European Council meeting of 25 February 2021 and the crucial decision to be made by all Member States at the WTO General Council on 1-2 March 2021. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the need to ensure global open access to COVID-19 health technologies and to rapidly scale up their manufacturing and supply has been widely acknowledged. However, despite efforts and statements made by the European Commission and several heads of state in support of treating COVID-19 medical products as global public goods, this has not yet translated into actionable realities. In this context, the EU’s open opposition to the TRIPS waiver risks exacerbating a dangerous North-South divide when it comes to affordable access to COVID-19 diagnostics, personal protective equipment, treatments and vaccines. The WTO decision on a potential waiver offers a crucial and much-needed act of effective solidarity, as it is an important step towards increasing local production in partner countries and, ultimately, suppressing this pandemic on a global scale.
  • Question for Written Answer

    Question for Written Answer

    Question for written answer E-003852/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE), Jutta Paulus (Verts/ALE), Anja Hazekamp (GUE/NGL), Günther Sidl (S&D), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE), Marie Toussaint (Verts/ALE), Pär Holmgren (Verts/ALE), Claude Gruffat (Verts/ALE), Bronis Ropė (Verts/ALE), Caroline Roose (Verts/ALE), Sarah Wiener (Verts/ALE), Benoît Biteau (Verts/ALE), Francisco Guerreiro (Verts/ALE) Subject: Mandate on US trade negotiations and GMO risk assessment In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that the fundamental difference between the approaches adopted by the EU (precautionary principle) and the US (liability of producers) concerning environmental and health risks has a direct and sometimes devastating impact on human wellbeing and environmental integrity. We are therefore concerned about the possible watering down of the precautionary principle if the approval process for genetically engineered organisms imported into the EU is speeded up as part of a trade agreement with the United States. Even today, the risk assessment of GMOs in the EU does not cover all possible effects, especially on a long-term timeframe. A further weakening of the procedure would pose unacceptable risks to the health of EU citizens and our environment. The European Parliament has therefore a right to know: 1. On the basis of which mandate are EU-US trade negotiations being carried out? 2. Is it true that the easier import of genetically engineered organisms forms part of these negotiations? 3. The Commission has stated that the EU and US are engaged in regular dialogues on biotechnology policies with a view to exchanging information and fostering cooperation.
  • Online EGP Council, 2-6 December 2020 Relating to the EGP Statutes

    Online EGP Council, 2-6 December 2020 Relating to the EGP Statutes

    Online EGP Council, 2-6 December 2020 Relating to the EGP Statutes The EGP Committee proposes three votes relating to the EGP Statutes: 1. For adoption: exception to Art 6.3.1 in the EGP Statutes “6.3.1 The Council is the highest decision-making body of the European Green Party. It is convened by the Committee and must meet at least once a year in person. Council meetings may be held in person or by telecommunication means under conditions laid down in the Rule Book.” The EGP Committee proposes to keep the text of article 6.3.1. as is, but asks the Council delegates to legitimize the 32nd EGP Council by adopting the exception not to hold a Council in person in 2020. This, in view of the extraordinary circumstances caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. 2. For adoption: change of legal seat of the European Green Party The EGP office has been in rue Wiertz 31 since the end of 2004. In need for more office space for the enlarged EGP staff, the Committee chose not to prolong the rental contract which ended on 31 July 2020, and instead decided to move the EGP headquarters to rue du Taciturne 34, 1000 Brussels. The actual move happened right after the Corona lockdown was lifted, early May. Therefore, the Committee presents the following change to the EGP Statutes: Nº Nº Current text Proposed change – new text Article The seat of the European Green The seat of the European Green Party is situated at rue du 1. 2.4 Party is situated at rue Wiertz 31, in Taciturne 34, in 1000 Brussels, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
  • Question for Written Answer

    Question for Written Answer

    Question for written answer E-006016/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Marie Toussaint (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), David Cormand (Verts/ALE), Karima Delli (Verts/ALE), Yannick Jadot (Verts/ALE), Damien Carême (Verts/ALE), Mounir Satouri (Verts/ALE), Caroline Roose (Verts/ALE), Benoît Biteau (Verts/ALE), Claude Gruffat (Verts/ALE), Salima Yenbou (Verts/ALE), Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield (Verts/ALE), François Alfonsi (Verts/ALE), Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE) Subject: French compliance with the Natura 2000 directives A judgment of the Court of Justice of 4 March 2010 criticised France, which is governed by the Habitats (1992) and Birds (2009) Directives that form the Natura 2000 network, for incorrect transposition. France had considered that hunting did not constitute activities causing disturbance to Natura 2000 sites. The subsequent amendment to the Environmental Code repealed the contested provision, but the legislation did not follow suit. Indeed, neither the national list of activities subject to the impact assessment procedure (Environmental Code, Article R414-19) nor local lists (Article R414- 20) include hunting, hence any decision concerning the assessment is referred to the prefect. Therefore, there is effectively no assessment. For example, in the Ramières Special Protection Area (classified as a national nature reserve), 13 species of bird that justified the site being designated an SPA are hunted, and there has been no Natura 2000 impact assessment. Some 58 000 citizens signed a petition calling for an end to hunting on this site. Given the decline in biodiversity, can the Commission insist that France complies with the Natura 2000 directives by making hunting subject to an impact assessment? PE661.139v01-00.
  • 30.6.2021 A9-0212/1 Amendment 1 Karima Delli, Ignazio Corrao

    30.6.2021 A9-0212/1 Amendment 1 Karima Delli, Ignazio Corrao

    30.6.2021 A9-0212/1 Amendment 1 Karima Delli, Ignazio Corrao, Damien Carême, Katrin Langensiepen, Benoît Biteau, Eleonora Evi, Rosa D'Amato, Piernicola Pedicini, Anna Cavazzini, Francisco Guerreiro, Saskia Bricmont, Salima Yenbou, Mounir Satouri, Claude Gruffat, Marie Toussaint, Ernest Urtasun, Sven Giegold, Stelios Kouloglou, Elena Kountoura, Martin Schirdewan, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, Tineke Strik, Henrike Hahn, Rasmus Andresen, Yannick Jadot, Kim Van Sparrentak, Bas Eickhout, José Gusmão, Anne-Sophie Pelletier, Martina Michels, Caroline Roose, Manon Aubry, Konstantinos Arvanitis, David Cormand, Monika Vana, Heidi Hautala, Ville Niinistö, Sarah Wiener, Daniel Freund, Tilly Metz, Jutta Paulus, Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield, Diana Riba i Giner, Reinhard Bütikofer, Philippe Lamberts, Grace O'Sullivan, Jordi Solé, Ciarán Cuffe, Martin Häusling, Sergey Lagodinsky, François Alfonsi, Sara Matthieu, Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel, Damian Boeselager, Hannah Neumann, Terry Reintke, Erik Marquardt, Alviina Alametsä, Michèle Rivasi, Thomas Waitz, Stasys Jakeliūnas, Michael Bloss, Niklas Nienaß, Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg, Margrete Auken, Pernando Barrena Arza, Alice Kuhnke, Jakop G. Dalunde, Pär Holmgren, Leila Chaibi, Petros Kokkalis, Ska Keller, Manuela Ripa, Alexandra Geese Report A9-0212/2021 Margarida Marques Review of the macroeconomic legislative framework (2020/2075(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 Motion for a resolution Amendment 45. Highlights the EFB’s opinion that 45. Highlights the EFB’s opinion that some clearly delineated sustainable some clearly delineated sustainable growth-enhancing expenditure would be growth-enhancing expenditure would be excluded from the net primary expenditure excluded from the net primary expenditure growth ceiling; growth ceiling; supports the application of such favourable treatment, under the new fiscal framework, to expenditure compliant with the EU’s green and forthcoming social taxonomy; Or.